Enzinger B, Pfitzinger PL, Ebner B, Ivanova T, Volz Y, Apfelbeck M, Kazmierczak P, Stief C, Chaloupka M. [Common errors, pitfalls, and management of complications of prostate biopsy : The most common diagnostic and procedural challenges of transrectal fusion prostate biopsy in the initial diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer].
UROLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023;
62:479-486. [PMID:
37052650 DOI:
10.1007/s00120-023-02063-y]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Transrectal (TR) prostate biopsy is the gold standard in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). It requires a precise and safe technique for sample acquisition.
OBJECTIVE
Several approaches will be discussed to avoid overdiagnosis, false-negative results, and complications of the procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We analyzed national and European guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, as well as prospective and retrospective studies to describe current trends in indication and performance of biopsies.
RESULTS
Incorporation of risk calculators and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into daily routine reduces biopsy rates and results in a more precise diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC). Combination of random- and MRI-fusion guided biopsy-but also extending the radius of sampling by 10 mm beyond the MRI lesion and a transperineal (TP) sampling approach - lead to a higher tumor-detection rate. Bleeding is the most common complication after prostate biopsy and is usually self-limiting. Postbiopsy infection rates can be reduced through TP biopsy.
CONCLUSION
TR MRI-fusion guided biopsy is a widely acknowledged tool in primary diagnostics of csPC. Higher detection rates and safety can be achieved through a TP sampling approach.
Collapse