Precision diabetes: a realistic outlook on a promising approach

Integration of Infant Metabolite, Genetic, and Islet Autoimmunity Signatures to Predict Type 1 Diabetes by Age 6 Years

CONTEXT

Biomarkers that can accurately predict risk of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in genetically predisposed children can facilitate interventions to delay or prevent the disease.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to determine if a combination of genetic, immunologic, and metabolic features, measured at infancy, can be used to predict the likelihood that a child will develop T1D by age 6 years.

METHODS

Newborns with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing were enrolled in the prospective birth cohort of The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY). TEDDY ascertained children in Finland, Germany, Sweden, and the United States. TEDDY children were either from the general population or from families with T1D with an HLA genotype associated with T1D specific to TEDDY eligibility criteria. From the TEDDY cohort there were 702 children will all data sources measured at ages 3, 6, and 9 months, 11.4% of whom progressed to T1D by age 6 years. The main outcome measure was a diagnosis of T1D as diagnosed by American Diabetes Association criteria.

RESULTS

Machine learning-based feature selection yielded classifiers based on disparate demographic, immunologic, genetic, and metabolite features. The accuracy of the model using all available data evaluated by the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve is 0.84. Reducing to only 3- and 9-month measurements did not reduce the area under the curve significantly. Metabolomics had the largest value when evaluating the accuracy at a low false-positive rate.

CONCLUSION

The metabolite features identified as important for progression to T1D by age 6 years point to altered sugar metabolism in infancy. Integrating this information with classic risk factors improves prediction of the progression to T1D in early childhood.

Prediction of the development of islet autoantibodies through integration of environmental, genetic, and metabolic markers

BACKGROUND

The Environmental Determinants of the Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) study has prospectively followed, from birth, children at increased genetic risk of type 1 diabetes. TEDDY has collected heterogenous data longitudinally to gain insights into the environmental and biological mechanisms driving the progression to persistent islet autoantibodies.

METHODS

We developed a machine learning model to predict imminent transition to the development of persistent islet autoantibodies based on time-varying metabolomics data integrated with time-invariant risk factors (eg, gestational age). The machine learning was initiated with 221 potential features (85 genetic, 5 environmental, 131 metabolomic) and an ensemble-based feature evaluation was utilized to identify a small set of predictive features that can be interrogated to better understand the pathogenesis leading up to persistent islet autoimmunity.

RESULTS

The final integrative machine learning model included 42 disparate features, returning a cross-validated receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74 and an AUC of ~0.65 on an independent validation dataset. The model identified a principal set of 20 time-invariant markers, including 18 genetic markers (16 single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs] and two HLA-DR genotypes) and two demographic markers (gestational age and exposure to a prebiotic formula). Integration with the metabolome identified 22 supplemental metabolites and lipids, including adipic acid and ceramide d42:0, that predicted development of islet autoantibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority (86%) of metabolites that predicted development of islet autoantibodies belonged to three pathways: lipid oxidation, phospholipase A2 signaling, and pentose phosphate, suggesting that these metabolic processes may play a role in triggering islet autoimmunity.

Diabetes affects endothelial cell function and alters fibrin clot formation in a microvascular flow model: A pilot study

Diabetes is a proinflammatory and prothrombotic condition that increases the risk of vascular complications. The aim of this study was to develop a diabetic microvascular flow model that allows to study the complex interactions between endothelial cells, blood cells and plasma proteins and their effects on clot formation. Primary human cardiac microvascular endothelial cells from donors without diabetes or donors with diabetes (type 1 or type 2) were grown in a microfluidic chip, perfused with non-diabetic or diabetic whole blood, and clot formation was assessed by measuring fibrin deposition in real time by confocal microscopy. Clot formation in non-diabetic whole blood was significantly increased in the presence of endothelial cells from donors with type 2 diabetes compared with cells from donors without diabetes. There was no significant difference in clot formation between non-diabetic and diabetic whole blood. We present for the first time a diabetic microvascular flow model as a new tool to study clot formation as a result of the complex interactions between endothelial cells, blood cells and plasma proteins in a diabetes setting. We show that endothelial cells affect clot formation in whole blood, attributing an important role to the endothelium in the development of atherothrombotic complications.

Innovations in personalised diabetes care and risk management

Type 2 diabetes is associated with an increased risk of developing macro and microvascular complications. Nevertheless, there is substantial heterogeneity between people with type 2 diabetes in their risk of developing such complications. Personalised medicine for people with type 2 diabetes may aid in efficient and tailored diabetes care for those at increased risk of developing such complications. Recently, progress has been made in the development of personalised diabetes care in several areas. Particularly for the risk prediction of cardiovascular disease, retinopathy and nephropathy, innovative methods have been developed for prediction and tailored monitoring or treatment to prevent such complications. For other complications or subpopulations of people with type 2 diabetes, such as the frail elderly, efforts are currently ongoing to develop such methods. In this review, we discuss the recent developments in innovations of personalised diabetes care for different complications and subpopulations of people with type 2 diabetes, their performance and modes of application in clinical practice.

Precision Medicine in Type 2 Diabetes: Clinical Markers of Insulin Resistance Are Associated With Altered Short- and Long-term Glycemic Response to DPP-4 Inhibitor Therapy

OBJECTIVE

A precision approach to type 2 diabetes therapy would aim to target treatment according to patient characteristics. We examined if measures of insulin resistance and secretion were associated with glycemic response to dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor therapy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We evaluated whether markers of insulin resistance and insulin secretion were associated with 6-month glycemic response in a prospective study of noninsulin-treated participants starting DPP-4 inhibitor therapy (Predicting Response to Incretin Based Agents [PRIBA] study; n = 254), with replication for routinely available markers in U.K. electronic health care records (Clinical Practice Research Datalink [CPRD]; n = 23,001). In CPRD, we evaluated associations between baseline markers and 3-year durability of response. To test the specificity of findings, we repeated analyses for glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (PRIBA, n = 339; CPRD, n = 4,464).

RESULTS

In PRIBA, markers of higher insulin resistance (higher fasting C-peptide [P = 0.03], HOMA2 insulin resistance [P = 0.01], and triglycerides [P < 0.01]) were associated with reduced 6-month HbA_1c response to DPP-4 inhibitors. In CPRD, higher triglycerides and BMI were associated with reduced HbA_1c response (both P < 0.01). A subgroup defined by obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m²) and high triglycerides (≥2.3 mmol/L) had reduced 6-month response in both data sets (PRIBA HbA_1c reduction 5.3 [95% CI 1.8, 8.6] mmol/mol [0.5%] [obese and high triglycerides] vs. 11.3 [8.4, 14.1] mmol/mol [1.0%] [nonobese and normal triglycerides]; P = 0.01). In CPRD, the obese, high- triglycerides subgroup also had less durable response (hazard ratio 1.28 [1.16, 1.41]; P < 0.001). There was no association between markers of insulin resistance and response to GLP-1 receptor agonists.

CONCLUSIONS

Markers of higher insulin resistance are consistently associated with reduced glycemic response to DPP-4 inhibitors. This finding provides a starting point for the application of a precision diabetes approach to DPP-4 inhibitor therapy.