[Periprosthetic infections of the hip joint : Clinical approach]

Copper-enriched hydroxyapatite coatings obtained by high-velocity suspension flame spraying. Effect of various gas parameters on biocompatibility

Hydroxyapatite (HAp)-coated bone implants are frequently used for orthopaedic or dental implants since they offer high biocompatibility and osteoconductivity. Yet, problems such as infections, e.g. periprosthetic joint infections, occur when implanting foreign material into the body. In this study, HAp coatings were produced via high-velocity suspension flame spraying (HVSFS). This method allows for the production of thin coatings. We investigated the effects of different gas parameters on the coating properties and on the biocompatibility, which was tested on the human osteosarcoma cell line MG63. Furthermore, Copper (Cu) was added to achieve antibacterial properties which were evaluated against standard microorganisms using the airborne assay. Three gas parameter groups (low, medium, and high) with different Cu additions (0 wt.%, 1 wt.% and 1.5 wt.%) were evaluated. Our findings show that porosity as well as hardness can be controlled through gas parameters. Furthermore, we showed that it is possible to add Cu through external injection. The Cu content in the coating as well as the release varies with different gas parameters. Both antibacterial efficacy as well as biocompatibility are affected by the Cu content. We could significantly reduce the amount of colony-forming units (CFU) in all coatings for E. coli, CFU for S. aureus was reduced by adding 1.5 wt.% of Cu to the coating. The biocompatibility testing showed a cytotoxicity threshold at a Cu-release of 14.3 mg/L in 120 hours. Based on our findings, we suggest medium gas parameters for HVSFS and the addition of 1 wt.% Cu to the coating. With these parameters, a reasonable antibacterial effect can be achieved while maintaining sufficient biocompatibility.

Bacterial pathogens and in-hospital mortality in revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection of the hip and knee: analysis of 346 patients

INTRODUCTION

The management of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) of the lower limb is challenging, and evidence-based recommendations are lacking. The present clinical investigation characterized the pathogens diagnosed in patients who underwent revision surgery for  PJI of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

The present study follows the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). The institutional databases of the RWTH University Medical Centre of Aachen, Germany, were accessed. The OPS (operation and procedure codes) 5-823 and 5-821 and the ICD (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems) codes T84.5, T84.7 or T84.8 were used. All patients with PJI of a previous THA and TKA who underwent revision surgery were retrieved and included for analysis.

RESULTS

Data from 346 patients were collected (181 THAs and 165 TKAs). 44% (152 of 346 patients) were women. Overall, the mean age at operation was 67.8 years, and the mean BMI was 29.2 kg/m2. The mean hospitalization length was 23.5 days. 38% (132 of 346) of patients presented a recurrent infection.

CONCLUSION

PJI remain a frequent cause for revisions after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Preoperative synovial fluid aspiration was positive in 37%, intraoperative microbiology was positive in 85%, and bacteraemia was present in 17% of patients. Septic shock was the major cause of in-hospital mortality. The most common cultured pathogens were Staph. epidermidis, Staph. aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Methicillin-resistant Staph aureus (MRSA). An improved understanding of PJI pathogens is important to plan treatment strategies and guide the choice of empirical antibiotic regimens in patients presenting with septic THAs and TKAs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Predicting the Exception-CRP and Primary Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

While primary hip arthroplasty is the most common operative procedure in orthopedic surgery, a periprosthetic joint infection is its most severe complication. Early detection and prediction are crucial. In this study, we aimed to determine the value of postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) and develop a formula to predict this rare, but devastating complication.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 708 patients with primary hip arthroplasty. CRP, white blood cell count (WBC), and several patient characteristics were assessed for 20 days following the operative procedure.

RESULTS

Eight patients suffered an early acute periprosthetic infection. The maximum CRP predicted an infection with a sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 56.9%, respectively, while a binary logistic regression reached values of 75% and 80%. A multinominal logistic regression, however, was able to predict an early infection with a sensitivity and specificity of 87.5% and 78.9%. With a one-phase decay, 71.6% of the postoperative CRP-variance could be predicted.

CONCLUSION

To predict early acute periprosthetic joint infection after primary hip arthroplasty, a multinominal logistic regression is the most promising approach. Including five parameters, an early infection can be predicted on day 5 after the operative procedure with 87.5% sensitivity, while it can be excluded with 78.9% specificity.

[Native joint infections]

Joint infections are a great challenge for the treating physicians. Infection of a native joint can result in the rapid destruction of the joint if treatment is inadequate or delayed and is associated with severe life-threatening diseases, such as sepsis. This article presents a detailed overview of the treatment of joint infections of native joints with a focus on the diagnostic approach and treatment decisions. Infections in native joints are caused either endogenously by hematogenic spreading or are caused by exogenous factors. A relevant proportion of joint infections in native joints occur in connection with iatrogenic measures, such as operations, synovial punctures and joint infiltrations. Fundamentally, acute infections represent an orthopedic surgical emergency, which is associated with the necessity for immediate operative measures. The best possible success can only be achieved by an interaction between early diagnosis, an adequate surgical approach and a tailor-made anti-infectious treatment. This is also the case with periprosthetic infections, which will be dealt with in detail in a second article.

Prospective Analysis of a Sterile, Semi-automated Tissue Biopsy Homogenization Method in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infections

BACKGROUND/AIM

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a serious complication of total joint arthroplasty. To effectively treat PJI, it is essential to identify the microorganism causing it and be able to combine correct surgical and anti-infective treatments. This cannot always be achieved with the currently employed diagnostic methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate a semi-automated tissue biopsy bead milling method (Ultra-TurrAX, Axonlab AG; Reichenbach, Germany) based on the hypothesis that the results are more sensitive for microbe detection and less prone to contamination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 35 consecutive patients undergoing 38 hip or knee arthroplasty revisions in this study. In addition to manually processed biopsies, we processed tissue specimens harvested intraoperatively using a semi-automated method. The sensitivity and specificity of both methods were calculated using MSIS criteria and sonication results as gold standards.

RESULTS

For total hip arthroplasty samples were evaluated separately based on MSIS criteria as the reference standard, Ultra-TurrAX processing yielded 81% (62-100%) sensitivity and 100% specificity. Using sonication as the gold standard, a sensitivity of 80% (60-100%) and specificity of 80% (45-100%) were calculated. In total knee arthroplasty, Ultra-TurrAX processing yielded 27% (1-54%) sensitivity and 57% (20-94%) specificity when using MSIS criteria as the gold standard. Using sonication as the gold standard, a sensitivity of 60% (17-100%) and specificity of 77% (54-100%) were calculated.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to analyze bead mill processing in total hip and knee arthroplasty revisions in a consecutive patient series. The method's sensitivity was comparable to and its specificity superior to regular sample processing results reported in the literature with respect to hip arthroplasties and to both hip and knee arthroplasties collectively. With respect to total knee arthroplasties, the method fared worse in our collective, most likely due to the small number of patients in the sample. Integrating the method into the clinical workflow allowed for speedier and more efficient sample handling and processing. The theoretical advantage of a lower risk of contamination because of fewer manual processing steps is, in our opinion, valid.

[Orthopaedic implant-associated infections: Update of antimicrobial therapy]

In infections related to prosthetic joints and internal fixation devices, microorganisms adhere as biofim on the surface of the implant. Biofilms are not only resistant to phagocytosis, but also to most antimicrobial agents. Therefore, spontaneous cure does never occur, and antibiotics have to be given for several months. According to traditional concepts, removal of all foreign material was considered as prerequisite for cure. Yet, during the last decades, it has been shown that staphylococcal biofilms can be eliminated by rifampin combination therapy, and Gram-negative biofilms by fluoroquinolones. However, reliable biofilm elimination is only possible, if the duration of infection does not exceed 3-4 weeks. Correct total duration of the antimicrobial therapy has never been tested in a controlled trial. Currently, treatment duration is 3 (hip prosthesis) and 6 (knee prosthesis) months in patients undergoing débridement with implant retention, one-stage exchange, and two-stage exchange with a short interval of 2-3 weeks. According to a recent observational trial, a treatment duration of 2 and 3 months, respectively, is equivalent to the longer duration in patients undergoing débridement and implant retention. The optimal surgical therapy should be chosen according to a rational algorithm. It is crucial choosing the optimal surgical intervention from the beginning, because the final functional success depends on the cure by the first attempt.

[Synovial biomarkers for differential diagnosis of painful arthroplasty]

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remain true clinical challenges. PJI diminishes therapeutic success, causes dissatisfaction for the patient and medical staff, and often requires extensive surgical revision(s). At the present time, an extensive multimodal algorithmic approach is used to avoid time- and cost-consuming diagnostic aberrations. However, especially in the case of the frequent and clinically most relevant "low-grade" PJI, the current diagnostic "gold standard" has reached its limits.

EVALUATION

Synovial biomarkers are thought to close this diagnostic gap, hopefully enabling the safe differentiation among aseptic, (chronic) septic, implant allergy-related and the arthrofibrotic genesis of symptomatic arthroplasty. Therefore, joint aspiration for obtaining synovial fluid is preferred over surgical synovial tissue biopsy because of the faster results, greater practicability, greater patient safety, and lower costs. In addition to the parameters synovial IL-6, CRP, and leukocyte esterase, novel biomarkers such as antimicrobial peptides and other proinflammatory cytokines are currently highlighted because of their very high to excellent diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Independent multicenter validation studies are required to show whether a set of different innovative synovial fluid biomarkers rather than a few single parameters is favorable for a safe "one-stop shop" differential diagnosis of PJI.