[Extracorporeal irradiation : Reimplantation of bone segments in the treatment of malignant bone tumours]

[Treatment concepts for complications after resection and defect reconstruction of pelvic tumours]

BACKGROUND

Partial pelvic resection, internal hemipelvectomy or sacrectomy as a result of bone sarcoma is still challenging. No matter what kind of reconstruction is used, there is still a much higher rate of complications in pelvic surgery compared to sarcoma surgery of the long bones.

OBJECTIVES

We describe the most common complications in pelvic sarcoma surgery and specific complications related to the reconstruction method. Handling strategies for these complications are specified.

METHODS

We performed a literature search and report our own experiences in the troubleshooting of pelvic surgery-related complications to gain an up-to-date overview of the state-of-the-art in management strategies.

RESULTS

Prospective randomized trials or meta-analyses on this topic are lacking. The literature search depicted that, besides local recurrence, deep infection after reconstruction is the most serious complication. An early revision with radical debridement has to be performed in order to save the reconstruction. In the case of a deep infection, the removal of all implants with a total loss of the reconstruction is often unavoidable. Therefore, an individualized risk-benefit analysis prior to surgery with respect to the type of reconstruction, or no reconstruction at all (hip transposition), together with the patient is advisable.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications-especially infections-after hemipelvectomy or sacrectomy are common. In the case of infection, in some cases, an early revision is the only chance to prevent a reconstruction from explantation.

[Specific intraoperative and secondary complications of biological reconstructions following extralesional tumour resections of malignant bone tumours]

BACKGROUND

The treatment of primary malignant bone tumours is interdisciplinary and individually adapted to the patient. Nowadays, limb salvage surgery is usually possible, and the subsequent reconstruction is carried out either by implantation of modular tumour megaprostheses or by biological reconstruction procedures. Special surgical and secondary complications have to be considered.

OBJECTIVES

Indication and explanation of various biological reconstruction procedures and presentation of specific peri- and postoperative complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An adapted literature review and the contribution of our own therapy experiences and case studies for the presentation of biological reconstructions and their complication management was performed.

RESULTS

In biological reconstructions, autografts, allografts or a combination of autografts and allografts are used. Stabilization is achieved with screw and plate osteosyntheses. The most common secondary complications are pseudarthrosis, interponate fracture, graft necrosis and secondary malpositions.

CONCLUSION

In selected cases, particularly at the upper extremities and in dia- or metaphyseal tumour sites, biological reconstruction after extralesional tumor resection is the surgical therapy of choice. The rate of long-term revision interventions is significantly lower compared to modular tumour megaprostheses. Biological reconstructions and the treatment of specific complications have to be performed in specialized centres for musculoskeletal surgical oncology/tumor orthopedics.