Association between mRNA expression of CD74 and IL10 and risk of ICU-acquired infections: a multicenter cohort study

Use of Immune Profiling Panel to assess the immune response of septic patients for prediction of worsening as a composite endpoint

Sepsis induces intense, dynamic and heterogeneous host response modulations. Despite improvement of patient management, the risk of mortality and healthcare-associated infections remains high. Treatments to counterbalance immune response are under evaluation, but effective biomarkers are still lacking to perform patient stratification. The design of the present study was defined to alleviate the limitations of existing literature: we selected patients who survived the initial hyperinflammatory response and are still hospitalized at day 5-7 after ICU admission. Using the Immune Profiling Panel (IPP), a fully automated RT-qPCR multiplex prototype, we optimized a machine learning model combining the IPP gene expression levels for the identification of patients at high risk of worsening, a composite endpoint defined as death or secondary infection, within one week after sampling. This was done on 332 sepsis patients selected from two retrospective studies. The IPP model identified a high-risk group comprising 30% of patients, with a significant increased proportion of worsening events at day 28 compared to the low-risk group (49% vs. 28%, respectively). These preliminary results underline the potential clinical application of IPP for sepsis patient stratification in a personalized medicine perspective, that will be confirmed in a larger prospective multicenter study.

Advances in the Study of Immunosuppressive Mechanisms in Sepsis

Sepsis is a life-threatening disease caused by a systemic infection that triggers a dysregulated immune response. Sepsis is an important cause of death in intensive care units (ICUs), poses a major threat to human health, and is a common cause of death in ICUs worldwide. The pathogenesis of sepsis is intricate and involves a complex interplay of pro- and anti-inflammatory mechanisms that can lead to excessive inflammation, immunosuppression, and potentially long-term immune disorders. Recent evidence highlights the importance of immunosuppression in sepsis. Immunosuppression is recognized as a predisposing factor for increased susceptibility to secondary infections and mortality in patients. Immunosuppression due to sepsis increases a patient's chance of re-infection and increases organ load. In addition, antibiotics, fluid resuscitation, and organ support therapy have limited impact on the prognosis of septic patients. Therapeutic approaches by suppressing excessive inflammation have not achieved the desired results in clinical trials. Research into immunosuppression has brought new hope for the treatment of sepsis, and a number of therapeutic approaches have demonstrated the potential of immunostimulatory therapies. In this article, we will focus on the mechanisms of immunosuppression and markers of immune monitoring in sepsis and describe various targets for immunostimulatory therapy in sepsis.

Identification of a sub-group of critically ill patients with high risk of intensive care unit-acquired infections and poor clinical course using a transcriptomic score

BACKGROUND

The development of stratification tools based on the assessment of circulating mRNA of genes involved in the immune response is constrained by the heterogeneity of septic patients. The aim of this study is to develop a transcriptomic score based on a pragmatic combination of immune-related genes detected with a prototype multiplex PCR tool.

METHODS

As training cohort, we used the gene expression dataset obtained from 176 critically ill patients enrolled in the REALISM study (NCT02638779) with various etiologies and still hospitalized in intensive care unit (ICU) at day 5-7. Based on the performances of each gene taken independently to identify patients developing ICU-acquired infections (ICU-AI) after day 5-7, we built an unweighted score assuming the independence of each gene. We then determined the performances of this score to identify a subgroup of patients at high risk to develop ICU-AI, and both longer ICU length of stay and mortality of this high-risk group were assessed. Finally, we validated the effectiveness of this score in a retrospective cohort of 257 septic patients.

RESULTS

This transcriptomic score (TScore) enabled the identification of a high-risk group of patients (49%) with an increased rate of ICU-AI when compared to the low-risk group (49% vs. 4%, respectively), with longer ICU length of stay (13 days [95% CI 8-30] vs. 7 days [95% CI 6-9], p < 0.001) and higher ICU mortality (15% vs. 2%). High-risk patients exhibited biological features of immune suppression with low monocytic HLA-DR levels, higher immature neutrophils rates and higher IL10 concentrations. Using the TScore, we identified 160 high-risk patients (62%) in the validation cohort, with 30% of ICU-AI (vs. 18% in the low-risk group, p = 0.06), and significantly higher mortality and longer ICU length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

The transcriptomic score provides a useful and reliable companion diagnostic tool to further develop immune modulating drugs in sepsis in the context of personalized medicine.

Immune Profiling Panel Gene Set Identifies Critically Ill Patients With Low Monocyte Human Leukocyte Antigen-DR Expression: Preliminary Results From the REAnimation Low Immune Status Marker (REALISM) Study

OBJECTIVES

There is a crucial unmet need for biomarker-guided diagnostic and prognostic enrichment in clinical trials evaluating immune modulating therapies in critically ill patients. Low monocyte expression of human leukocyte antigen-DR (mHLA-DR), considered as a reference surrogate to identify immunosuppressed patients, has been proposed for patient stratification in immunostimulation approaches. However, its widespread use in clinic has been somewhat hampered by technical constraints inherent to flow cytometry technology. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the ability of a prototype multiplex polymerase chain reaction tool (immune profiling panel [IPP]) to identify immunosuppressed ICU patients characterized by a low mHLA-DR expression.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Adult ICU in a University Hospital, Lyon, France.

PATIENTS

Critically ill patients with various etiologies enrolled in the REAnimation Low Immune Status Marker study (NCT02638779).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

mHLA-DR and IPP data were obtained from 1,731 blood samples collected from critically ill patients with various etiologies and healthy volunteers. A partial least square regression model combining the expression levels of IPP markers was trained and used for the identification of samples from patients presenting with evidence of immunosuppression, defined here as mHLADR less than 8,000 antibodies bound per cell (AB/C). The IPP gene set had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% CI 0.83-0.89) for the identification of immunosuppressed patients. In addition, when applied to the 123 patients still in the ICU at days 5-7 after admission, IPP similarly enriched the number of patients with ICU-acquired infections in the immunosuppressed group (26%), in comparison with low mHLA-DR (22%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports on the potential of the IPP gene set to identify ICU patients presenting with mHLA-DR less than 8,000 AB/C. Upon further optimization and validation, this molecular tool may help in the stratification of patients that could benefit from immunostimulation in the context of personalized medicine.

Prospective multicentre study of host response signatures in neonatal sepsis in Sub Saharan Africa

Few biomarkers for sepsis diagnosis are commonly used in neonatal sepsis. While the role of host response is increasingly recognized in sepsis pathogenesis and prognosis, there is a need for evaluating new biomarkers targeting host response in regions where sepsis burden is high and medico-economic resources are scarce. The objective of the study is to evaluate diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of biomarkers of neonatal sepsis in Sub Saharan Africa. This prospective multicentre study included newborn infants delivered in the Abomey-Calavi region in South Benin and their follow-up from birth to 3 months of age. Accuracy of transcriptional (CD74, CX3CR1), proteic (PCT, IL-6, IL-10, IP-10) biomarkers and clinical characteristics to diagnose and prognose neonatal sepsis were measured. At delivery, cord blood from all consecutive newborns were sampled and analysed, and infants were followed for a 12 weeks' period. Five hundred and eighty-one newborns were enrolled. One hundred and seventy-two newborns developed neonatal sepsis (29.6%) and death occurred in forty-nine infants (8.4%). Although PCT, IL-6 and IP-10 levels were independently associated with sepsis diagnosis, diagnostic accuracy of clinical variables combinations was similar to combinations with biomarkers and superior to biomarkers alone. Nonetheless, CD74, being the only biomarkers independently associated with mortality, showed elevated prognosis accuracy (AUC > 0.9) either alone or in combination with other biomarkers (eg. CD74/IP-10) or clinical criterion (eg. Apgar 1, birth weight). These results suggest that cord blood PCT had a low accuracy for diagnosing early onset neonatal sepsis in Sub Saharan African neonates, while association of clinical criterion showed to be more accurate than any biomarkers taken independently. At birth, CD74, either associated with IP-10 or clinical criterion, had the best accuracy in prognosing sepsis mortality.Trial registration Clinicaltrial.gov registration number: NCT03780712. Registered 19 December 2018. Retrospectively registered.

Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: mechanisms, diagnosis and current treatment options

Sepsis is a common complication of combat injuries and trauma, and is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. It is also one of the significant causes of death and increased health care costs in modern intensive care units. The use of antibiotics, fluid resuscitation, and organ support therapy have limited prognostic impact in patients with sepsis. Although its pathophysiology remains elusive, immunosuppression is now recognized as one of the major causes of septic death. Sepsis-induced immunosuppression is resulted from disruption of immune homeostasis. It is characterized by the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines, abnormal death of immune effector cells, hyperproliferation of immune suppressor cells, and expression of immune checkpoints. By targeting immunosuppression, especially with immune checkpoint inhibitors, preclinical studies have demonstrated the reversal of immunocyte dysfunctions and established host resistance. Here, we comprehensively discuss recent findings on the mechanisms, regulation and biomarkers of sepsis-induced immunosuppression and highlight their implications for developing effective strategies to treat patients with septic shock.

Mortality Prediction in Sepsis With an Immune-Related Transcriptomics Signature: A Multi-Cohort Analysis

Background

Novel biomarkers are needed to progress toward individualized patient care in sepsis. The immune profiling panel (IPP) prototype has been designed as a fully-automated multiplex tool measuring expression levels of 26 genes in sepsis patients to explore immune functions, determine sepsis endotypes and guide personalized clinical management. The performance of the IPP gene set to predict 30-day mortality has not been extensively characterized in heterogeneous cohorts of sepsis patients.

Methods

Publicly available microarray data of sepsis patients with widely variable demographics, clinical characteristics and ethnical background were co-normalized, and the performance of the IPP gene set to predict 30-day mortality was assessed using a combination of machine learning algorithms.

Results

We collected data from 1,801 arrays sampled on sepsis patients and 598 sampled on controls in 17 studies. When gene expression was assayed at day 1 following admission (1,437 arrays sampled on sepsis patients, of whom 1,161 were alive and 276 (19.2%) were dead at day 30), the IPP gene set showed good performance to predict 30-day mortality, with an area under the receiving operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.710 (CI 0.652-0.768). Importantly, there was no statistically significant improvement in predictive performance when training the same models with all genes common to the 17 microarray studies (n = 7,122 genes), with an AUROC = 0.755 (CI 0.697-0.813, p = 0.286). In patients with gene expression data sampled at day 3 following admission or later, the IPP gene set had higher performance, with an AUROC = 0.804 (CI 0.643-0.964), while the total gene pool had an AUROC = 0.787 (CI 0.610-0.965, p = 0.811).

Conclusion

Using pooled publicly-available gene expression data from multiple cohorts, we showed that the IPP gene set, an immune-related transcriptomics signature conveys relevant information to predict 30-day mortality when sampled at day 1 following admission. Our data also suggests that higher predictive performance could be obtained when assaying gene expression at later time points during the course of sepsis. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings using the IPP gene set on its dedicated measurement platform.

Immune Profiling Demonstrates a Common Immune Signature of Delayed Acquired Immunodeficiency in Patients With Various Etiologies of Severe Injury

OBJECTIVES

The host response plays a central role in the pathophysiology of sepsis and severe injuries. So far, no study has comprehensively described the overtime changes of the injury-induced immune profile in a large cohort of critically ill patients with different etiologies.

DESIGN

Prospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Adult ICU in a University Hospital in Lyon, France.

PATIENTS

Three hundred fifty-three septic, trauma, and surgical patients and 175 healthy volunteers were included in the REAnimation Low Immune Status Marker study.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Extensive immune profiling was performed by assessing cellular phenotypes and functions, protein, and messenger RNA levels at days 1-2, 3-4, and 5-7 after inclusion using a panel of 30 standardized immune markers. Using this immunomonitoring panel, no specificity in the immune profile was observed among septic, trauma, and surgical patients. This common injury-induced immune response was characterized by an initial adaptive (i.e., physiologic) response engaging all constituents of the immune system (pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine releases, and innate and adaptive immune responses) but not associated with increased risk of secondary infections. In contrary, the persistence in a subgroup of patients of profound immune alterations at the end of the first week after admission was associated with increased risk of secondary infections independently of exposure to invasive devices. The combined monitoring of markers of pro-/anti-inflammatory, innate, and adaptive immune responses allowed a better enrichment of patients with risk of secondary infections in the selected population.

CONCLUSIONS

Using REAnimation Low Immune Status Marker immunomonitoring panel, we detected delayed injury-acquired immunodeficiency in a subgroup of severely injured patients independently of primary disease. Critically ill patients' immune status could be captured through the combined monitoring of a common panel of complementary markers of pro-/anti-inflammatory, innate, and adaptive immune responses. Such immune monitoring needs to be incorporated in larger study cohorts with more extensive immune surveillance to develop specific hypothesis allowing for identification of biological systems affecting altered immune function related to late infection in the setting of acute systemic injury.

New Insights in the Pathophysiology of Hospital- and Ventilator-Acquired Pneumonia: A Complex Interplay between Dysbiosis and Critical-Illness-Related Immunosuppression

Both hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) have long been considered as diseases resulting from the invasion by pathogens of a previously sterile lung environment. Based on this historical understanding of their pathophysiology, our approaches for the prevention and treatment have significantly improved the outcomes of patients, but treatment failures remain frequent. Recent studies have suggested that the all-antimicrobial therapy-based treatment of pneumonia has reached a glass ceiling. The demonstration that the constant interactions between the respiratory microbiome and mucosal immunity are required to tune homeostasis in a state of symbiosis has changed our comprehension of pneumonia. We proposed that HAP and VAP should be considered as a state of dysbiosis, defined as the emergence of a dominant pathogen thriving at the same time from the catastrophic collapse of the fragile ecosystem of the lower respiratory tract and from the development of critical-illness-related immunosuppression. This multidimensional approach to the pathophysiology of HAP and VAP holds the potential to achieve future successes in research and critical care. Microbiome and mucosal immunity can indeed be manipulated and used as adjunctive therapies or targets to prevent or treat pneumonia.

Immunomonitoring of Monocyte and Neutrophil Function in Critically Ill Patients: From Sepsis and/or Trauma to COVID-19

Immune cells and mediators play a crucial role in the critical care setting but are understudied. This review explores the concept of sepsis and/or injury-induced immunosuppression and immuno-inflammatory response in COVID-19 and reiterates the need for more accurate functional immunomonitoring of monocyte and neutrophil function in these critically ill patients. in addition, the feasibility of circulating and cell-surface immune biomarkers as predictors of infection and/or outcome in critically ill patients is explored. It is clear that, for critically ill, one size does not fit all and that immune phenotyping of critically ill patients may allow the development of a more personalized approach with tailored immunotherapy for the specific patient. In addition, at this point in time, caution is advised regarding the quality of evidence of some COVID-19 studies in the literature.

Herpes DNAemia and TTV Viraemia in Intensive Care Unit Critically Ill Patients: A Single-Centre Prospective Longitudinal Study

Introduction

We analysed blood DNAemia of TTV and four herpesviruses (CMV, EBV, HHV6, and HSV-1) in the REAnimation Low Immune Status Marker (REALISM) cohort of critically ill patients who had presented with either sepsis, burns, severe trauma, or major surgery. The aim was to identify common features related to virus and injury-associated pathologies and specific features linking one or several viruses to a particular pathological context.

Methods

Overall and individual viral DNAemia were measured over a month using quantitative PCR assays from the 377 patients in the REALISM cohort. These patients were characterised by clinical outcomes [severity scores, mortality, Intensive Care Unit (ICU)-acquired infection (IAI)] and 48 parameters defining their host response after injury (cell populations, immune functional assays, and biomarkers). Association between viraemic event and clinical outcomes or immune markers was assessed using χ²-test or exact Fisher’s test for qualitative variables and Wilcoxon test for continuous variables.

Results

The cumulative incidence of viral DNAemia increased from below 4% at ICU admission to 35% for each herpesvirus during the first month. EBV, HSV1, HHV6, and CMV were detected in 18%, 12%, 10%, and 9% of patients, respectively. The incidence of high TTV viraemia (>10,000 copies/ml) increased from 11% to 15% during the same period. Herpesvirus viraemia was associated with severity at admission; CMV and HHV6 viraemia correlated with mortality during the first week and over the month. The presence of individual herpesvirus during the first month was significantly associated (p < 0.001) with the occurrence of IAI, whilst herpesvirus DNAemia coupled with high TTV viraemia during the very first week was associated with IAI. Herpesvirus viraemia was associated with a lasting exacerbated host immune response, with concurrent profound immune suppression and hyper inflammation, and delayed return to immune homeostasis. The percentage of patients presenting with herpesvirus DNAemia was significantly higher in sepsis than in all other groups. Primary infection in the hospital and high IL10 levels might favour EBV and CMV reactivation.

Conclusion

In this cohort of ICU patients, phenotypic differences were observed between TTV and herpesviruses DNAemia. The higher prevalence of herpesvirus DNAemia in sepsis hints at further studies that may enable a better in vivo understanding of host determinants of herpesvirus viral reactivation. Furthermore, our data suggest that EBV and TTV may be useful as additional markers to predict clinical deterioration in ICU patients.

Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression

Sepsis is expected to have a substantial impact on public health and cost as its prevalence increases. Factors contributing to increased prevalence include a progressively aging population, advances in the use of immunomodulatory agents to treat a rising number of diseases, and immune-suppressing therapies in organ transplant recipients and cancer patients. It is now recognized that sepsis is associated with profound and sustained immunosuppression, which has been implicated as a predisposing factor in the increased susceptibility of patients to secondary infections and mortality. In this review, we discuss mechanisms of sepsis-induced immunosuppression and biomarkers that identify a state of impaired immunity. We also highlight immune-enhancing strategies that have been evaluated in patients with sepsis, as well as therapeutics under current investigation. Finally, we describe future challenges and the need for a new treatment paradigm, integrating predictive enrichment with patient factors that may guide the future selection of tailored immunotherapy. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Physiology, Volume 84 is February 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Single-cell RNA sequencing of blood antigen-presenting cells in severe COVID-19 reveals multi-process defects in antiviral immunity

COVID-19 can lead to life-threatening respiratory failure, with increased inflammatory mediators and viral load. Here, we perform single-cell RNA-sequencing to establish a high-resolution map of blood antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in 15 patients with moderate or severe COVID-19 pneumonia, at day 1 and day 4 post admission to intensive care unit or pulmonology department, as well as in 4 healthy donors. We generated a unique dataset of 81,643 APCs, including monocytes and rare dendritic cell (DC) subsets. We uncovered multi-process defects in antiviral immune defence in specific APCs from patients with severe disease: (1) increased pro-apoptotic pathways in plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs, key effectors of antiviral immunity), (2) a decrease of the innate sensors TLR9 and DHX36 in pDCs and CLEC9a⁺ DCs, respectively, (3) downregulation of antiviral interferon-stimulated genes in monocyte subsets and (4) a decrease of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II-related genes and MHC class II transactivator activity in cDC1c⁺ DCs, suggesting viral inhibition of antigen presentation. These novel mechanisms may explain patient aggravation and suggest strategies to restore the defective immune defence.

Immune Profiling Panel: A Proof-of-Concept Study of a New Multiplex Molecular Tool to Assess the Immune Status of Critically Ill Patients

BACKGROUND

Critical illness such as sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome defined as a dysregulated host response to infection and is characterized by patients exhibiting impaired immune response. In the field of diagnosis, a gap still remains in identifying the immune profile of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

A new multiplex immune profiling panel (IPP) prototype was assessed for its ability to semiquantify messenger RNA immune-related markers directly from blood, using the FilmArray System, in less than an hour. Samples from 30 healthy volunteers were used for the technical assessment of the IPP tool. Then the tool was clinically assessed using samples from 10 healthy volunteers and 20 septic shock patients stratified using human leukocyte antigen-DR expression on monocytes (mHLA-DR).

RESULTS

The IPP prototype consists of 16 biomarkers that target the immune response. The majority of the assays had a linear expression with different RNA inputs and a coefficient of determination (R2) > 0.8. Results from the IPP pouch were comparable to standard quantitative polymerase chain reaction and the assays were within the limits of agreement in Bland-Altman analysis. Quantification cycle values of the target genes were normalized against reference genes and confirmed to account for the different cell count and technical variability. The clinical assessment of the IPP markers demonstrated various gene modulations that could distinctly differentiate 3 profiles: healthy volunteers, intermediate mHLA-DR septic shock patients, and low mHLA-DR septic shock patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of IPP showed great potential for the development of a fully automated, rapid, and easy-to-use immune profiling tool. The IPP tool may be used in the future to stratify critically ill patients in the ICU according to their immune status. Such stratification will enable personalized management of patients and guide treatments to avoid secondary infections and lower mortality.

Sepsis and Cancer: An Interplay of Friends and Foes

Sepsis and cancer share a number of pathophysiological features, and both result from the inability of the host's immune system to cope with the initial insult (tissue invasion by pathogens and malignant cell transformation, respectively). The common coexistence of both disorders and the profound related alterations in immune homeostasis raise the question of their mutual impact on each other's course. This translational review aims to discuss the interactions between cancer and sepsis supported by clinical data and the translation to experimental models. The dramatic improvement in cancer has come at a cost of increased risks of life-threatening infectious complications. Investigating the long-term outcomes of sepsis survivors has revealed an unexpected susceptibility to cancer long after discharge from the ICU. Nonetheless, it is noteworthy that an acute septic episode may harbor antitumoral properties under particular circumstances. Relevant double-hit animal models have provided clues to whether and how bacterial sepsis may impact malignant tumor growth. In sequential sepsis-then-cancer models, postseptic mice exhibited accelerated tumor growth. When using reverse cancer-then-sepsis models, bacterial sepsis applied to mice with cancer conversely resulted in inhibition or even regression of tumor growth. Experimental models thus highlight dual effects of sepsis on tumor growth, mostly depending on the sequence of insults, and allow deciphering the immune mechanisms and their relation with microorganisms.

Deciphering heterogeneity of septic shock patients using immune functional assays: a proof of concept study

The complexity of sepsis pathophysiology hinders patient management and therapeutic decisions. In this proof-of-concept study we characterised the underlying host immune response alterations using a standardised immune functional assay (IFA) in order to stratify a sepsis population. In septic shock patients, ex vivo LPS and SEB stimulations modulated, respectively, 5.3% (1/19) and 57.1% (12/21) of the pathways modulated in healthy volunteers (HV), highlighting deeper alterations induced by LPS than by SEB. SEB-based clustering, identified 3 severity-based groups of septic patients significantly different regarding mHLA-DR expression and TNFα level post-LPS, as well as 28-day mortality, and nosocomial infections. Combining the results from two independent cohorts gathering 20 HV and 60 patients, 1 cluster grouped all HV with 12% of patients. The second cluster grouped 42% of patients and contained all non-survivors. The third cluster grouped 46% of patients, including 78% of those with nosocomial infections. The molecular features of these clusters indicated a distinctive contribution of previously described genes defining a “healthy-immune response” and a “sepsis-related host response”. The third cluster was characterised by potential immune recovery that underlines the possible added value of SEB-based IFA to capture the sepsis immune response and contribute to personalised management.

SEPSIS project: a protocol for studying biomarkers of neonatal sepsis and immune responses of infants in a malaria-endemic region

INTRODUCTION

Neonatal sepsis outreaches all causes of neonatal mortality worldwide and remains a major societal burden in low and middle income countries. In addition to limited resources, endemic morbidities, such as malaria and prematurity, predispose neonates and infants to invasive infection by altering neonatal immune response to pathogens. Nevertheless, thoughtful epidemiological, diagnostic and immunological evaluation of neonatal sepsis and the impact of gestational malaria have never been performed.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A prospective longitudinal multicentre follow-up of 580 infants from birth to 3 months of age in urban and suburban Benin will be performed. At delivery, and every other week, all children will be examined and clinically evaluated for occurrence of sepsis. At delivery, cord blood systematic analysis of selected plasma and transcriptomic biomarkers (procalcitonin, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, IP10, CD74 and CX3CR1) associated with sepsis pathophysiology will be evaluated in all live births as well as during the follow-up, and when sepsis will be suspected. In addition, whole blood response to selected innate stimuli and extensive peripheral blood mononuclear cells phenotypic characterisation will be performed. Reference intervals specific to sub-Saharan neonates will be determined from this cohort and biomarkers performances for neonatal sepsis diagnosis and prognosis tested.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been obtained from the Comité d'Ethique de la Recherche - Institut des Sciences Biomédicales Appliquées (CER-ISBA 85 - 5 April 2016, extended on 3 February 2017). Results will be disseminated through international presentations at scientific meetings and publications in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03780712.

Staging and Personalized Intervention for Infection and Sepsis

Background: Sepsis is defined as a dysregulated host response to infection, resulting in life-threatening organ dysfunction. It is now understood that this dysregulation not only constitutes excessive inflammation, but also sustained immune suppression. Immune-modulatory therapies thus have great potential for novel sepsis therapies. Here, we provide a review of biomarkers and functional assays designed to immunologically stage patients with sepsis as well as therapies designed to alter the innate and adaptive immune systems of patients with sepsis beneficially. Methods: A search of PubMed/MEDLINE and clinicaltrials.gov was performed between October 1, 2019 and December 22, 2019 using search terms such as "sepsis immunotherapy," "sepsis biomarkers," "sepsis clinical trials," and variations thereof. Results: Despite more than 30 years of research, there is still no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared biomarker that has proven to be effective in either identifying patients with sepsis who are at an increased risk of adverse outcomes or responsive to specific interventions. Similarly, past clinical trials investigating new treatment strategies have rarely stratified patients with sepsis. Overall, the results of these trials have been disappointing. Novel efforts to properly gauge an individual patient's immune response and choose an appropriate immunomodulatory agent based on the results are underway. Conclusion: Our evolving understanding of the different mechanisms perturbing immune homeostasis during sepsis strongly suggests that future successes will depend on finding the right therapy for the right patient and administering it at the right time. For such a personalized medicine approach, novel biomarkers and functional assays to properly stage the patient with sepsis will be crucial. The growing repertoire of immunomodulatory agents at our disposal, as well as re-appraisal of agents that have already been tested in unstratified cohorts of patients with sepsis, may finally translate into successful treatment strategies for sepsis.

Dynamic LTR retrotransposon transcriptome landscape in septic shock patients

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Numerous studies have explored the complex and dynamic transcriptome modulations observed in sepsis patients, but a large fraction of the transcriptome remains unexplored. This fraction could provide information to better understand sepsis pathophysiology. Multiple levels of interaction between human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and the immune response have led us to hypothesize that sepsis is associated with HERV transcription and that HERVs may contribute to a signature among septic patients allowing stratification and personalized management.

METHODS

We used a high-density microarray and RT-qPCR to evaluate the HERV and Mammalian Apparent Long Terminal Repeat retrotransposons (MaLR) transcriptome in a pilot study that included 20 selected septic shock patients, stratified on mHLA-DR expression, with samples collected on day 1 and day 3 after inclusion. We validated the results in an unselected, independent cohort that included 100 septic shock patients on day 3 after inclusion. We compared septic shock patients, according to their immune status, to describe the transcriptional HERV/MaLR and conventional gene expression. For differential expression analyses, moderated t tests were performed and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to analyze RT-qPCR results.

RESULTS

We showed that 6.9% of the HERV/MaLR repertoire was transcribed in the whole blood, and septic shock was associated with an early modulation of a few thousand of these loci, in comparison to healthy volunteers. We provided evidence that a subset of HERV/MaLR and conventional genes were differentially expressed in septic shock patients, according to their immune status, using monocyte HLA-DR (mHLA-DR) expression as a proxy. A group of 193 differentially expressed HERV/MaLR probesets, tested in an independent septic shock cohort, identified two groups of patients with different immune status and severity features.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that a large, unexplored part of our genome, which codes for HERV/MaLR, may be linked to the host immune response. The identified set of HERV/MaLR probesets should be evaluated on a large scale to assess the relevance of these loci in the stratification of septic shock patients. This may help to address the heterogeneity of these patients.

A new simplified and accurate sa-SOFA score

PURPOSE

Several remarks have been raised regarding the variables and cut-points used in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. This study revisited the SOFA score and created a new simplified and accurate sa-SOFA score.

METHODS

The study grouped four prospective cohorts (2005-2016) of patients with Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome. It collected 28-day mortality, sociodemographic characteristics, and the SOFA score with all variable values at Day 1. A logistic regression analysis was used to select the most relevant variables and a minimum p value approach with a 10-fold cross-validation were used to find the optimal partition of selected variables. The minimum number of cut-points (2, 3, or 4) was also tested by comparing the distributions of areas under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves.

RESULTS

Among the 1436 participants, 416 died within 28 days (28.9%). The sa-SOFA kept one variable per dimension and two cut-points per variable. The AUROC curves that investigated the abilities of the sa-SOFA and SOFA scores to predict 28-day mortality were 0.739 [0.712-0.768] and 0.687 [0.656-0.717], respectively (p-value of DeLong test <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Keeping the conventional SOFA dimension variables, the new sa-SOFA proved to be simpler and more accurate in predicting 28-day mortality.

Immune checkpoint inhibition in sepsis: a Phase 1b randomized study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of nivolumab

PURPOSE

Sepsis-associated immunosuppression increases hospital-acquired infection and viral reactivation risk. A key underlying mechanism is programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)-mediated T-cell function impairment. This is one of the first clinical safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) assessments of the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab and its effect on immune biomarkers in sepsis.

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, Phase 1b study in 31 adults at 10 US hospital ICUs with sepsis diagnosed ≥ 24 h before study treatment, ≥ 1 organ dysfunction, and absolute lymphocyte count ≤ 1.1 × 10³ cells/μL. Participants received one nivolumab dose [480 mg (n = 15) or 960 mg (n = 16)]; follow-up was 90 days. Primary endpoints were safety and PK parameters.

RESULTS

Twelve deaths occurred [n = 6 per study arm; 40% (480 mg) and 37.5% (960 mg)]. Serious AEs occurred in eight participants [n = 1, 6.7% (480 mg); n = 7, 43.8% (960 mg)]. AEs considered by the investigator to be possibly drug-related and immune-mediated occurred in five participants [n = 2, 13.3% (480 mg); n = 3, 18.8% (960 mg)]. Mean ± SD terminal half-life was 14.7 ± 5.3 (480 mg) and 15.8 ± 7.9 (960 mg) days. All participants maintained > 90% receptor occupancy (RO) 28 days post-infusion. Median (Q1, Q3) mHLA-DR levels increased to 11,531 (6528, 19,495) and 11,449 (6225, 16,698) mAbs/cell in the 480- and 960-mg arms by day 14, respectively. Pro-inflammatory cytokine levels did not increase.

CONCLUSIONS

In this sepsis population, nivolumab administration did not result in unexpected safety findings or indicate any 'cytokine storm'. The PK profile maintained RO > 90% for ≥ 28 days. Further efficacy and safety studies are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER (CLINICALTRIALS.GOV): NCT02960854.

Low Interleukin-7 Receptor Messenger RNA Expression Is Independently Associated With Day 28 Mortality in Septic Shock Patients

OBJECTIVES

Septic shock is the primary cause of death in ICUs. A better comprehension of its pathophysiology, in particular, the immune alteration mechanisms, opened new therapeutic perspectives such as the recombinant interleukin-7. The use of biomarkers could improve the identification of eligible patients for this therapy. The soluble form of the interleukin-7 appears as a promising candidate in this regard since an association between its high plasmatic level and mortality in critically ill patients has been demonstrated. Because there are no data available on the transcriptional regulation of the interleukin-7 receptor in such patients, this study aimed to explore the expression level of different interleukin-7 receptor transcripts after septic shock and evaluate their association with mortality.

DESIGN

Retrospective discovery cohort (30 patients) and validation cohort (177 patients).

SETTING

Two French ICUs (discovery study) and six French ICUs (validation study).

PATIENTS

Adult septic shock patients.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The quantification of several interleukin-7 receptor transcripts using specific reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction designs allowed for global evaluation of interleukin-7 receptor gene expression in whole blood. In the discovery cohort, all interleukin-7 receptor transcripts studied were expressed at lower levels in septic shock patients than in healthy volunteers. Interleukin-7 receptor gene expression at day 3 after septic shock diagnosis was associated with day 28 mortality. Patients at a lower risk of death showed higher expression levels. These results were confirmed in the independent validation cohort. Interestingly, using a threshold obtained on the discovery cohort, we observed in the validation cohort a high negative predictive value for day 28 mortality for the transcript encoding the membrane form of interleukin-7 receptor (0.86; 95% CI, 0.79-0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Interleukin-7 receptor transcripts appear as biomarkers of impaired adaptive immune response in septic shock patients and as a promising tool for patient stratification in clinical trials evaluating immunoadjuvant therapies.

Early herpes and TTV DNAemia in septic shock patients: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Septic shock patients exhibit an increased incidence of viral reactivation. Precise timing of such reactivation-as an early marker of immune suppression, or as a consequence of the later-is not known precisely. Here, using a fully designed nucleic acid extraction automated procedure together with tailored commercial PCR kits, we focused on the description of early reactivation within the first week of ICU admission of several herpes viruses and Torque Teno virus (TTV) in 98 septic shock patients.

RESULTS

Most of septic shock patients had at least one viremia event during the first week (88%). TTV and herpesviruses were detected in 56% and 53% of septic shock patient, respectively. The two most frequent herpesviruses detected within the first week were EBV (35%) and HSV1 (26%). Different kinetic were observed among herpesviruses, faster for EBV and HSV1 than for CMV and HHV6. Although no association was found between herpes viremia and secondary infections, patients with herpesviridae-related viremia were more severe, e.g., higher SOFA scores and plasma lactate levels. While reactivating only 1 virus was not associated with mortality, patients with multiple viremia events had higher ICU mortality. Surprisingly, EBV + TTV early reactivation seemed associated with a lower D28 mortality. No clear association was observed between viremia and immune biomarkers.

CONCLUSION

Applying a semi-automated process of viral DNAemia determination to this cohort of 98 patients with septic shock, we observed that the number of patients with positive viremia increased during the first week in the ICU. Of note, there was no improvement in predicting the outcome when using viremia status. Nevertheless, this pilot study, introducing standardized procedures from extraction to detection, provides the basis for future standardized diagnostic criteria. A prospective longitudinal clinical study using these procedures will enable determination of whether such viremia is due to a lack of a latent virus control by the immune system or a true clinical viral infection.

TCR activation mimics CD127lowPD-1high phenotype and functional alterations of T lymphocytes from septic shock patients

Background

Sepsis is the leading cause of mortality for critically ill patients worldwide. Patients develop T lymphocyte dysfunctions leading to T-cell exhaustion associated with increased risk of death. As interleukin-7 (IL-7) is currently tested in clinical trials to reverse these dysfunctions, it is important to evaluate the expression of its specific CD127 receptor on the T-cell surface of patients with septic shock. Moreover, the CD127^lowPD-1^high phenotype has been proposed as a T-cell exhaustion marker in chronic viral infections but has never been evaluated in sepsis. The objective of this study was first to evaluate CD127 and CD127^lowPD-1^high phenotype in septic shock in parallel with functional T-cell alterations. Second, we aimed to reproduce septic shock–induced T-cell alterations in an ex vivo model.

Methods

CD127 expression was followed at the protein and mRNA levels in patients with septic shock and healthy volunteers. CD127^lowPD-1^high phenotype was also evaluated in parallel with T-cell functional alterations after ex vivo activation. To reproduce T-cell alterations observed in patients, purified T cells from healthy volunteers were activated ex vivo and their phenotype and function were evaluated.

Results

In patients, neither CD127 expression nor its corresponding mRNA transcript level was modified compared with normal values. However, the percentage of CD127^lowPD-1^high T cells was increased while T cells also presented functional alterations. CD127^lowPD-1^high T cells co-expressed HLA-DR, an activation marker, suggesting a role for T-cell activation in the development of this phenotype. Indeed, T-cell receptor (TCR) activation of normal T lymphocytes ex vivo reproduced the increase of CD127^lowPD-1^high T cells and functional alterations following a second stimulation, as observed in patients. Finally, in this model, as observed in patients, IL-7 could improve T-cell proliferation.

Conclusions

The proportion of CD127^lowPD-1^high T cells in patients was increased compared with healthy volunteers, although no global CD127 regulation was observed. Our results suggest that TCR activation participates in the occurrence of this T-cell population and in the development of T-cell alterations in septic shock. Furthermore, we provide an ex vivo model for the investigation of the pathophysiology of sepsis-induced T-cell immunosuppression and the testing of innovative immunostimulant treatments.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2305-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Immune therapy in sepsis: Are we ready to try again?

Immune therapy to ease the burden of sepsis has thus far failed to consistently improve patient outcomes. Advances in cancer immune therapy and awareness that prolonged immune-suppression in sepsis can leave patients vulnerable to secondary infection and death have driven resurgence in the field of sepsis immune-therapy investigation. As we develop and evaluate these novel therapies, we must learn from past experiences where single-mediator targeted immune therapies were blindly delivered to heterogeneous patient cohorts with complex and evolving immune responses. Advances in genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and point-of-care technology, coupled with a better understanding of sepsis pathogenesis, have meant that personalised immune-therapy is on the horizon. Here, we review the complex immune pathogenesis in sepsis and the contemporary immune therapies that are being investigated to manipulate this response. An outline of the immune biomarkers that may be used to support this approach is also provided.

MicroRNAs 143 and 150 in whole blood enable detection of T-cell immunoparalysis in sepsis

Background

Currently, no suitable clinical marker for detection of septic immunosuppression is available. We aimed at identifying microRNAs that could serve as biomarkers of T-cell mediated immunoparalysis in sepsis.

Methods

RNA was isolated from purified T-cells or from whole blood cells obtained from septic patients and healthy volunteers. Differentially regulated miRNAs were identified by miRNA Microarray (n = 7). Validation was performed via qPCR (n = 31).

Results

T-cells of septic patients revealed characteristics of immunosuppression: Pro-inflammatory miR-150 and miR-342 were downregulated, whereas anti-inflammatory miR-15a, miR-16, miR-93, miR-143, miR-223 and miR-424 were upregulated. Assessment of T-cell effector status showed significantly reduced mRNA-levels of IL2, IL7R and ICOS, and increased levels of IL4, IL10 and TGF-β. The individual extent of immunosuppression differed markedly. MicroRNA-143, − 150 and − 223 independently indicated T-cell immunoparalysis and significantly correlated with patient’s IL7R-/ICOS-expression and SOFA-scores. In whole blood, composed of innate and adaptive immune cells, both traits of immunosuppression and hyperinflammation were detected. Importantly, miR-143 and miR-150 – both predominantly expressed in T-cells – retained strong power of discrimination also in whole blood samples.

Conclusions

These findings suggest miR-143 and miR-150 as promising markers for detection of T-cell immunosuppression in whole blood and may help to develop new approaches for miRNA-based diagnostic in sepsis.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s10020-018-0056-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Advances in the understanding and treatment of sepsis-induced immunosuppression

Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction that is caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Sepsis can induce acute kidney injury and multiple organ failures and represents the most common cause of death in the intensive care unit. Sepsis initiates a complex immune response that varies over time, with the concomitant occurrence of both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. As a result, most patients with sepsis rapidly display signs of profound immunosuppression, which is associated with deleterious consequences. Scientific advances have highlighted the role of metabolic failure, epigenetic reprogramming, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, immature suppressive neutrophils and immune alterations in primary lymphoid organs (the thymus and bone marrow) in sepsis. An improved understanding of the mechanisms underlying this immunosuppression as well as of the similarities between sepsis-induced immunosuppression and immune defects in cancer or immunosenescence has led to novel therapeutic strategies aimed at stimulating immune function in patients with sepsis. Trials assessing the therapeutic benefit of IL-7, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and antibodies against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PDL1) for the treatment of sepsis are in progress. The reappraisal of sepsis pathophysiology has also resulted in a novel approach to the design of clinical trials evaluating sepsis treatments, based on an evaluation of the immune status and biomarker-based stratification of patients.

Résumés de la table ronde du 37ème Congrès De La SFB, 8 Juin 2017

The main topic of the 2017 SFB congress was « burn and infections ». It took place on Thursday, 8th June. Twenty presentations were given, and this article illustrates each of them. The authors are listed above and the title of each paragraph is the title of their presentation.