The long road home: are outcomes different for patients with sepsis?

Heme oxygenase-1 as a predictor of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Sepsis patients suffer from severe inflammation and poor prognosis. Oxidative stress and local inflammation that results from sepsis can trigger organ injury, including acute kidney injury (AKI). Previous studies have shown that heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) is overexpressed in proximal tubular cells under oxidative stress and has significant cytoprotective and anti-inflammatory effects. Heme-induced inflammation in sepsis is antagonized by increased tissue expression of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), which impacts on AKI development. The investigators observed intrarenal HO-1 expression and corresponding potential increases in plasma and urinary HO-1 protein concentrations in four different AKI models. Since serum levels of HO-1 reflect HO-1 expression, we aimed to investigate whether serum HO-1 could predict the development of AKI in sepsis patient.

METHODS

A total of 83 sepsis patients were enrolled in this study including septic patients with AKI and sepsis patients without AKI. According to the definition of septic shock and the global kidney diagnostic criteria described in the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO), patients were allocated to the sepsis and septic shock groups with and without AKI, respectively. The serum levels of HO-1 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences between septic patients with AKI and sepsis patients without AKI in terms of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, hospitalization time, and laboratory indicators including serum HO-1, creatine kinase MB (CK-MB), troponin I (TnI), urea, myoglobin (MYO), serum creatinine (Scr), procalcitonin, and activated partial thromboplastin time. Serum levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), urea, MYO, Scr, procalcitonin, activated partial thromboplastin time, and prothrombin time exhibited significant differences among the four groups. The concentration of serum HO-1 was higher in sepsis-induced AKI compared with sepsis patients without AKI. Serum HO-1 levels were increased in patients with sepsis shock-induced AKI. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for serum HO-1 combined with Scr was 0.885 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.761-1.000].

CONCLUSIONS

Serum HO-1 is positively correlated with sepsis-induced AKI. These findings suggest that measurement of serum HO-1 may play a diagnostic and prediction role in sepsis-induced AKI.

Understanding and Enhancing Sepsis Survivorship. Priorities for Research and Practice

An estimated 14.1 million patients survive sepsis each year. Many survivors experience poor long-term outcomes, including new or worsened neuropsychological impairment; physical disability; and vulnerability to further health deterioration, including recurrent infection, cardiovascular events, and acute renal failure. However, clinical trials and guidelines have focused on shorter-term survival, so there are few data on promoting longer-term recovery. To address this unmet need, the International Sepsis Forum convened a colloquium in February 2018 titled "Understanding and Enhancing Sepsis Survivorship." The goals were to identify gaps and limitations of current research and shorter- and longer-term priorities for understanding and enhancing sepsis survivorship. Twenty-six experts from eight countries participated. The top short-term priorities identified by nominal group technique culminating in formal voting were to better leverage existing databases for research, develop and disseminate educational resources on postsepsis morbidity, and partner with sepsis survivors to define and achieve research priorities. The top longer-term priorities were to study mechanisms of long-term morbidity through large cohort studies with deep phenotyping, build a harmonized global sepsis registry to facilitate enrollment in cohorts and trials, and complete detailed longitudinal follow-up to characterize the diversity of recovery experiences. This perspective reviews colloquium discussions, the identified priorities, and current initiatives to address them.