1
|
Apelseth TO, Raza S, Callum J, Ipe T, Blackwood B, Akhtar A, Hess JR, Marks DC, Brown B, Delaney M, Wendel S, Stanworth SJ. A review and analysis of outcomes in randomized clinical trials of plasma transfusion in patients with bleeding or for the prevention of bleeding: The BEST collaborative study. Transfusion 2024. [PMID: 38623793 DOI: 10.1111/trf.17835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous systematic reviews have revealed an inconsistency of outcome definitions as a major barrier in providing evidence-based guidance for the use of plasma transfusion to prevent or treat bleeding. We reviewed and analyzed outcomes in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to provide a methodology for describing and classifying outcomes. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS RCTs involving transfusion of plasma published after 2000 were identified from a prior review (Yang 2012) and combined with an updated systematic literature search of multiple databases (July 1, 2011 to January 17, 2023). Inclusion of publications, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments were performed in duplicate. (PROSPERO registration number is: CRD42020158581). RESULTS In total, 5579 citations were identified in the new systematic search and 22 were included. Six additional trials were identified from the previous review, resulting in a total of 28 trials: 23 therapeutic and five prophylactic studies. An increasing number of studies in the setting of major bleeding such as in cardiovascular surgery and trauma were identified. Eighty-seven outcomes were reported with a mean of 11 (min-max. 4-32) per study. There was substantial variation in outcomes used with a preponderance of surrogate measures for clinical effect such as laboratory parameters and blood usage. CONCLUSION There is an expanding literature on plasma transfusion to inform guidelines. However, considerable heterogeneity of reported outcomes constrains comparisons. A core outcome set should be developed for plasma transfusion studies. Standardization of outcomes will motivate better study design, facilitate comparison, and improve clinical relevance for future trials of plasma transfusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torunn O Apelseth
- Department of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Norwegian Armed Forces Joint Medical Services, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sheharyar Raza
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jeannie Callum
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre and Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Tina Ipe
- Our Blood Institute, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | | | - John R Hess
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Denese C Marks
- Research and Development, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bethany Brown
- American Red Cross, Medical and Scientific Office, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | - Simon J Stanworth
- NHSBT, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust; Blood Transfusion Research Unit (BTRU), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aitken LM, Emerson LM, Kydonaki K, Blackwood B, Creagh-Brown B, Lone NI, McKenzie CA, Reade MC, Weir CJ, Wise MP, Walsh TS. Alpha 2 agonists for sedation to produce better outcomes from critical illness (A2B trial): protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e081637. [PMID: 38580355 PMCID: PMC11002363 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION An association between deep sedation and adverse short-term outcomes has been demonstrated although this evidence has been inconsistent. The A2B (alpha-2 agonists for sedation in critical care) sedation trial is designed to determine whether the alpha-2 agonists clonidine and dexmedetomidine, compared with usual care, are clinically and cost-effective. The A2B intervention is a complex intervention conducted in 39 intensive care units (ICUs) in the UK. Multicentre organisational factors, variable cultures, perceptions and practices and the involvement of multiple members of the healthcare team add to the complexity of the A2B trial. From our pretrial contextual exploration it was apparent that routine practices such as type and frequency of pain, agitation and delirium assessment, as well as the common sedative agents used, varied widely across the UK. Anticipated challenges in implementing A2B focused on the impact of usual practice, perceptions of risk, ICU culture, structure and the presence of equipoise. Given this complexity, a process evaluation has been embedded in the A2B trial to uncover factors that could impact successful delivery and explore their impact on intervention delivery and interpretation of outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a mixed-methods process evaluation guided by the A2B intervention logic model. It includes two phases of data collection conducted during and at the end of trial. Data will be collected using a combination of questionnaires, stakeholder interviews and routinely collected trial data. A framework approach will be used to analyse qualitative data with synthesis of data within and across the phases. The nature of the relationship between delivery of the A2B intervention and the trial primary and secondary outcomes will be explored. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION All elements of the A2B trial, including the process evaluation, are approved by Scotland A Research Ethics Committee (Ref. 18/SS/0085). Dissemination will be via publications, presentations and media engagement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03653832.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leanne M Aitken
- School of Health & Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Lydia M Emerson
- School of Health & Psychological Sciences, City University of London, London, UK
| | - Kalliopi Kydonaki
- Department of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | - Nazir I Lone
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University of Edinburgh Division of Clinical and Surgical Sciences, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Cathrine A McKenzie
- Department of Pharmacy and Critical Care, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Michael C Reade
- The University of Queensland - Saint Lucia Campus, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Christopher J Weir
- Division of Clinical and Surgical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Matt P Wise
- Department of Adult Critical Care, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Timothy S Walsh
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University of Edinburgh Division of Clinical and Surgical Sciences, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
O’Neill B, Green N, Blackwood B, McAuley D, Moran F, MacCormac N, Johnston P, McNamee JJ, Shevlin C, Bradley J. Recovery following discharge from intensive care: What do patients think is helpful and what services are missing? PLoS One 2024; 19:e0297012. [PMID: 38498470 PMCID: PMC10947670 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recovery following critical illness is complex due to the many challenges patients face which influence their long-term outcomes. We explored patients' views about facilitators of recovery after critical illness which could be used to inform the components and timing of specific rehabilitation interventions. AIMS To explore the views of patients after discharge from an intensive care unit (ICU) about their recovery and factors that facilitated recovery, and to determine additional services that patients felt were missing during their recovery. METHODS Qualitative study involving individual face-to-face semi-structured interviews at six months (n = 11) and twelve months (n = 10). Written, informed consent was obtained. [Ethics approval 17/NI/0115]. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and analysed using template analysis. FINDINGS Template analysis revealed four core themes: (1) Physical activity and function; (2) Recovery of cognitive and emotional function; (3) Facilitators to recovery; and (4) Gaps in healthcare services. CONCLUSION Patient reported facilitators to recovery include support and guidance from others and self-motivation and goal setting, equipment for mobility and use of technology. Barriers include a lack of follow up services, exercise rehabilitation, peer support and personal feedback. Patients perceived that access to specific healthcare services was fragmented and where services were unavailable this contributed to slower or poorer quality of recovery. ICU patient recover could be facilitated by a comprehensive rehabilitation intervention that includes patient-directed strategies and health care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenda O’Neill
- Centre for Health and Rehabilitation Technologies, INHR, Ulster University, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Natasha Green
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Wellcome-Wolfson Institute of Experimental Medicine, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Wellcome-Wolfson Institute of Experimental Medicine, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Danny McAuley
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Wellcome-Wolfson Institute of Experimental Medicine, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Fidelma Moran
- Centre for Health and Rehabilitation Technologies, INHR, Ulster University, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Niamh MacCormac
- Centre for Health and Rehabilitation Technologies, INHR, Ulster University, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Claire Shevlin
- Craigavon Area Hospital, SHSCT, Craigavon, United Kingdom
| | - Judy Bradley
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Wellcome-Wolfson Institute of Experimental Medicine, Belfast, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mumin MA, McKenzie CA, Page VJ, Hadfield D, Aitken LM, Hanks F, Cunningham E, Blackwood B, Van Dellen E, Slooter AJC, Grocott MPW, McAuley DF, Spronk PE. Whole blood thiamine, intravenous thiamine supplementation and delirium occurrence in the intensive care unit: retrospective cohort analyses. Int J Clin Pharm 2024:10.1007/s11096-023-01690-x. [PMID: 38332207 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-023-01690-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thiamine di-phosphate is an essential cofactor in glucose metabolism, glutamate transformation and acetylcholinesterase activity, pathways associated with delirium occurrence. We hypothesised that a deficiency in whole blood thiamine and intravenous thiamine supplementation could impact delirium occurrence. AIM To establish whether a deficiency in whole blood thiamine and/or intravenous thiamine supplementation within 72 h of intensive care admission is associated with delirium occurrence. METHOD The first dataset was secondary analysis of a previous study in an intensive care unit in the Netherlands, reported in 2017. The second dataset contained consecutive intensive care admissions 2 years before (period 1: October 2014 to October 2016) and after (period 2: April 2017 to April 2019) routine thiamine supplementation was introduced within 72 h of admission. Delirium was defined as a positive Confusion Assessment Method-Intensive Care Unit score(s) in 24 h. RESULTS Analysis of the first dataset (n = 57) using logistic regression showed no relationship between delirium and sepsis or whole blood thiamine, but a significant association with age (p = 0.014). In the second dataset (n = 3074), 15.1% received IV thiamine in period 1 and 62.6% during period 2. Hierarchical regression analysis reported reduction in delirium occurrence in the second period; this did not reach statistical significance, OR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.652-1.002); p = 0.052. CONCLUSION No relationship was detected between whole blood thiamine and delirium occurrence on admission, at 24 and 48 h. It remains unclear whether routine intravenous thiamine supplementation during intensive care admission impacts delirium occurrence. Further prospective randomised clinical trials are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad A Mumin
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK.
- National Institute of Health and Social Care Research, Biomedical Research Centre, Perioperative and Critical Care Theme, University of Southampton School of Medicine, Southampton, UK.
| | - Cathrine A McKenzie
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK
- National Institute of Health and Social Care Research, Biomedical Research Centre, Perioperative and Critical Care Theme, University of Southampton School of Medicine, Southampton, UK
- Pharmacy and Critical Care, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK
| | - Valerie J Page
- Intensive Care, West Hertfordshire NHS Foundation Trust, Watford General Hospital, Vicarage Road, Watford, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - Daniel Hadfield
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK
- King's Critical Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Leanne M Aitken
- School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, UK
| | - Fraser Hanks
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK
- Pharmacy, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, UK
| | - Emma Cunningham
- Centre for Public Health, Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Centre for Public Health, Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Edwin Van Dellen
- Departments of Psychiatry and Intensive Care, UMC Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, UZ Brussel and Vrrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Arjen J C Slooter
- Departments of Psychiatry and Intensive Care, UMC Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, UZ Brussel and Vrrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michael P W Grocott
- National Institute of Health and Social Care Research, Biomedical Research Centre, Perioperative and Critical Care Theme, University of Southampton School of Medicine, Southampton, UK
- Pharmacy and Critical Care, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK
| | - Daniel F McAuley
- Centre for Public Health, Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Peter E Spronk
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelre Ziekenhuizen Apeldoorn, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
- Expertise Center for Intensive Care Rehabilitation (ExpIRA), Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McGuigan PJ, Bowcock EM, Barrett NA, Blackwood B, Boyle AJ, Cadamy AJ, Camporota L, Conlon J, Cove ME, Gillies MA, McDowell C, McNamee JJ, O'Kane CM, Puxty A, Sim M, Parsons-Simmonds R, Szakmany T, Young N, Orde S, McAuley DF. The Effect of Lower Tidal Volume Ventilation Facilitated by Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal Compared With Conventional Lung Protective Ventilation on Cardiac Function. Crit Care Explor 2024; 6:e1028. [PMID: 38213419 PMCID: PMC10783412 DOI: 10.1097/cce.0000000000001028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Lower tidal volume ventilation (targeting 3 mL/kg predicted body weight, PBW) facilitated by extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) has been investigated as a potential therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) in the pRotective vEntilation with veno-venouS lung assisT in respiratory failure (REST) trial. We investigated the effect of this strategy on cardiac function, and in particular the right ventricle. DESIGN Substudy of the REST trial. SETTING Nine U.K. ICUs. PATIENTS Patients with AHRF (Pao2/Fio2 < 150 mm Hg [20 kPa]). INTERVENTION Transthoracic echocardiography and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) measurements were collected at baseline and postrandomization in patients randomized to ECCO2R or usual care. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome measures were a difference in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) on postrandomization echocardiogram and difference in NT-proBNP postrandomization. RESULTS There were 21 patients included in the echocardiography cohort (ECCO2R, n = 13; usual care, n = 8). Patient characteristics were similar in both groups at baseline. Median (interquartile range) tidal volumes were lower in the ECCO2R group compared with the usual care group postrandomization; 3.6 (3.1-4.2) mL/kg PBW versus 5.2 (4.9-5.7) mL/kg PBW, respectively (p = 0.01). There was no difference in the primary outcome measure of mean (sd) TAPSE in the ECCO2R and usual care groups postrandomization; 21.3 (5.4) mm versus 20.1 (3.2) mm, respectively (p = 0.60). There were 75 patients included in the NT-proBNP cohort (ECCO2R, n = 36; usual care, n = 39). Patient characteristics were similar in both groups at baseline. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) tidal volumes were lower in the ECCO2R group than the usual care group postrandomization; 3.8 (3.3-4.2) mL/kg PBW versus 6.7 (5.8-8.1) mL/kg PBW, respectively (p < 0.0001). There was no difference in median (IQR) NT-proBNP postrandomization; 1121 (241-5370) pg/mL versus 1393 (723-4332) pg/mL in the ECCO2R and usual care groups, respectively (p = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS In patients with AHRF, a reduction in tidal volume facilitated by ECCO2R, did not modify cardiac function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J McGuigan
- Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Emma M Bowcock
- Nepean Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nicholas A Barrett
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew J Boyle
- Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew J Cadamy
- Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Luigi Camporota
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - John Conlon
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Clíona McDowell
- Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | | | - Cecilia M O'Kane
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Alex Puxty
- Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Malcolm Sim
- Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | | | - Tamas Szakmany
- Royal Gwent Hospital, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, United Kingdom
- Department of Anaesthesia Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Neil Young
- Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Orde
- Nepean Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Daniel F McAuley
- Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Walsh TS, Aitken LM, McKenzie CA, Boyd J, Macdonald A, Giddings A, Hope D, Norrie J, Weir C, Parker RA, Lone NI, Emerson L, Kydonaki K, Creagh-Brown B, Morris S, McAuley DF, Dark P, Wise MP, Gordon AC, Perkins G, Reade M, Blackwood B, MacLullich A, Glen R, Page VJ. Alpha 2 agonists for sedation to produce better outcomes from critical illness (A2B Trial): protocol for a multicentre phase 3 pragmatic clinical and cost-effectiveness randomised trial in the UK. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e078645. [PMID: 38072483 PMCID: PMC10729141 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Almost all patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) in intensive care units (ICUs) require analgesia and sedation. The most widely used sedative drug is propofol, but there is uncertainty whether alpha2-agonists are superior. The alpha 2 agonists for sedation to produce better outcomes from critical illness (A2B) trial aims to determine whether clonidine or dexmedetomidine (or both) are clinically and cost-effective in MV ICU patients compared with usual care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Adult ICU patients within 48 hours of starting MV, expected to require at least 24 hours further MV, are randomised in an open-label three arm trial to receive propofol (usual care) or clonidine or dexmedetomidine as primary sedative, plus analgesia according to local practice. Exclusions include patients with primary brain injury; postcardiac arrest; other neurological conditions; or bradycardia. Unless clinically contraindicated, sedation is titrated using weight-based dosing guidance to achieve a Richmond-Agitation-Sedation score of -2 or greater as early as considered safe by clinicians. The primary outcome is time to successful extubation. Secondary ICU outcomes include delirium and coma incidence/duration, sedation quality, predefined adverse events, mortality and ICU length of stay. Post-ICU outcomes include mortality, anxiety and depression, post-traumatic stress, cognitive function and health-related quality of life at 6-month follow-up. A process evaluation and health economic evaluation are embedded in the trial.The analytic framework uses a hierarchical approach to maximise efficiency and control type I error. Stage 1 tests whether each alpha2-agonist is superior to propofol. If either/both interventions are superior, stages 2 and 3 testing explores which alpha2-agonist is more effective. To detect a mean difference of 2 days in MV duration, we aim to recruit 1437 patients (479 per group) in 40-50 UK ICUs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Scotland A REC approved the trial (18/SS/0085). We use a surrogate decision-maker or deferred consent model consistent with UK law. Dissemination will be via publications, presentations and updated guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03653832.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Simon Walsh
- The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Julia Boyd
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Alix Macdonald
- The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Annabel Giddings
- The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - John Norrie
- Usher Institute, Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh No. 9, Bioquarter, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Christopher Weir
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Nazir I Lone
- The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Benedict Creagh-Brown
- Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Stephen Morris
- Primary Care Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Paul Dark
- Intensive Care Unit, University of Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK
| | - Matt P Wise
- Department of Adult Critical Care, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Anthony C Gordon
- Section of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Gavin Perkins
- Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Birmingham, UK
| | - Michael Reade
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | | | - Valerie J Page
- Intensive Care, West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jordan J, Tume L, Clarke M, McAuley D, McDowell C, McIlmurray L, Morris K, Peters M, Walsh T, Blackwood B. Delivery of a novel intervention to facilitate liberation from mechanical ventilation in paediatric intensive care: A process evaluation. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0293063. [PMID: 38011103 PMCID: PMC10681213 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prolonged mechanical ventilation increases the risk of mortality and morbidity. Optimising sedation and early testing for possible liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) has been shown to reduce time on the ventilator. Alongside a multicentre trial of sedation and ventilation weaning, we conducted a mixed method process evaluation to understand how the intervention content and delivery was linked to trial outcomes. METHODS 10,495 children admitted to 18 paediatric intensive care units (ICUs) in the United Kingdom participated in a stepped-wedge, cluster randomised controlled trial, with 1955 clinical staff trained to deliver the intervention. The intervention comprised assessment and optimisation of sedation levels, and bedside screening of respiratory parameters to indicate readiness for a spontaneous breathing trial prior to liberation from ventilation. 193 clinical staff were interviewed towards the end of the trial. Interview data were thematically analysed, and quantitative adherence data were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS The intervention led to a reduced duration of IMV (adjusted median difference- 7.1 hours, 95% CI -9.6 to -5.3, p = 0.01). Overall intervention adherence was 75% (range 59-85%). Ease and flexibility of the intervention promoted it use; designated responsibilities, explicit pathways of decision-making and a shared language for communication fostered proactivity and consistency towards extubation. Delivery of the intervention was hindered by established hospital and unit organisational and patient care routines, clinician preference and absence of clinical leadership. CONCLUSIONS The SANDWICH trial showed a significant, although small, reduction in duration of IMV. Findings suggest that greater direction in decision-making pathways, robust embedment of new practice in unit routine, and capitalising on the skills of Advanced Nurse Practitioners and physiotherapists would have contributed to greater intervention effect. TRIAL REGISTRATION isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN16998143.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Jordan
- School of Health, Wellbeing and Social Care, Open University, Milton Keynes, England
| | - Lyvonne Tume
- Faculty of Heath, Social Care & Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, England
- PICU, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Trust, Liverpool, England
| | - Mike Clarke
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Danny McAuley
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Cliona McDowell
- Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Hospitals, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Lisa McIlmurray
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Kevin Morris
- Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, England
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England
| | - Mark Peters
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University College London, London, England
- Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, England
| | - Timothy Walsh
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Silversides JA, McMullan R, Emerson LM, Bradbury I, Bannard-Smith J, Szakmany T, Trinder J, Rostron AJ, Johnston P, Ferguson AJ, Boyle AJ, Blackwood B, Marshall JC, McAuley DF. Correction: Feasibility of conservative fluid administration and deresuscitation compared with usual care in critical illness: the Role of Active Deresuscitation Correction: After Resuscitation-2 (RADAR-2) randomised clinical trial. Intensive Care Med 2023; 49:1440. [PMID: 37642672 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-023-07174-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan A Silversides
- Department of Critical Care, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University of Belfast, Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK.
| | - Ross McMullan
- Department of Critical Care, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Lydia M Emerson
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Ian Bradbury
- Independent Consulting Statistician, Aviemore, UK
| | - Jonathan Bannard-Smith
- Department of Critical Care, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Tamas Szakmany
- Critical Care Directorate, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, UK
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - John Trinder
- Intensive Care Unit, South-Eastern Health and Social Care Trust, Dundonald, UK
| | - Anthony J Rostron
- Integrated Critical Care Unit, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Paul Johnston
- Intensive Care Unit, Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Antrim, UK
| | - Andrew J Ferguson
- Department of Critical Care, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Andrew J Boyle
- Department of Critical Care, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University of Belfast, Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK
- Intensive Care Unit, Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Antrim, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University of Belfast, Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK
| | - John C Marshall
- Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Daniel F McAuley
- Department of Critical Care, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University of Belfast, Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Eadie R, McKenzie CA, Hadfield D, Kalk NJ, Bolesta S, Dempster M, McAuley DF, Blackwood B. Opioid, sedative, preadmission medication and iatrogenic withdrawal risk in UK adult critically ill patients: a point prevalence study. Int J Clin Pharm 2023; 45:1167-1175. [PMID: 37454025 PMCID: PMC10600273 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-023-01614-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome, after exposure medication known to cause withdrawal is recognised, yet under described in adult intensive care. AIM To investigate, opioid, sedation, and preadmission medication practice in critically ill adults with focus on aspects associated with iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome. METHOD One-day point prevalence study in UK intensive care units (ICUs). We collected ICU admission medication and/or substances with withdrawal potential, sedation policy, opioid and sedative use, dose, and duration. RESULTS Thirty-seven from 39 participating ICUs contributed data from 386 patients. The prevalence rate for parenteral opioid and sedative medication was 56.1% (212 patients). Twenty-three ICUs (59%) had no sedation/analgesia policy, and no ICUs screened for iatrogenic withdrawal. Patient admission medications with withdrawal-potential included antidepressants or antipsychotics (43, 20.3%) and nicotine (41, 19.3%). Of 212 patients, 202 (95.3%) received opioids, 163 (76.9%) sedatives and 153 (72.2%) both. Two hundred and two (95.3%) patients received opioids: 167 (82.7%) by continuous infusions and 90 (44.6%) patients for longer than 96-h. One hundred and sixty-three (76.9%) patients received sedatives: 157 (77.7%) by continuous infusions and 74 (45.4%) patients for longer than 96-h. CONCLUSION Opioid sedative and admission medication with iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome potential prevalence rates were high, and a high proportion of ICUs had no sedative/analgesic policies. Nearly half of patients received continuous opioids and sedatives for longer than 96-h placing them at high risk of iatrogenic withdrawal. No participating unit reported using a validated tool for iatrogenic withdrawal assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekah Eadie
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine and Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queens University Belfast, University Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK
- South-Eastern Health and Social Care Board, Trust Headquarters, Ulster Hospital, Upper Newtonards Road, Dundonald, BT16 1RH, UK
| | - Cathrine A McKenzie
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, School of Medicine, Perioperative and Critical Care Theme and NIHR Applied Research Collaborative (ARC), University of Southampton, Wessex, Southampton, S016 6YD, UK.
- Pharmacy and Critical Care, University Hospital, Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, S016 6YD, UK.
- Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care and Department of Addiction, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Cancer and Pharmacy, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
| | - Daniel Hadfield
- Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care and Department of Addiction, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Cancer and Pharmacy, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, UK
- Department of Critical Care, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nicola J Kalk
- Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care and Department of Addiction, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Cancer and Pharmacy, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, UK
- Bethlam Royal Hospital, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Monks Orchard Road, Beckenham, BR3 3BX, UK
| | - Scott Bolesta
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Nesbitt School of Pharmacy, Wilkes University, 84 West South Street, Wilkes-Barre, PA, 18766, USA
| | - Martin Dempster
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine and Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queens University Belfast, University Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Daniel F McAuley
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine and Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queens University Belfast, University Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine and Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queens University Belfast, University Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kelly N, Blackwood B, Credland N, Stayt L, Causey C, Winning L, McAuley DF, Lundy FT, El Karim I. Oral health care in adult intensive care units: A national point prevalence study. Nurs Crit Care 2023; 28:773-780. [PMID: 37125669 DOI: 10.1111/nicc.12919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The importance of good oral hygiene for patients in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) is well recognized, however, the most effective way to achieve good oral care in the ICU is unclear. AIM This study aimed to provide a national picture of oral care practices in adult ICUs in the United Kingdom (UK) to identify areas for improvement. STUDY DESIGN A national one-day point prevalence study was undertaken in adult ICUs in the UK in the period from 30th September to 14th October 2021. Data were collected on all patients in the ICU on the date of data collection. Using a validated electronic data collection form, anonymised data were collected on methods and frequency of oral care provided, and the use of oral care protocols within the ICU. Data were analysed using descriptive analysis. RESULTS Data from 195 patients in 15 ICUs in England, Wales and Northern Ireland were collected. Written oral care protocols were available for use in the care of 65% (n = 127) of patients. 73% (n = 142) of patients received oral care within the 24-h period. Oral care methods included toothbrushing 41% (n = 79), foam sticks 3% (n = 5), moisturizing the oral cavity 10% (n = 19) and mouth rinse with chlorhexidine 3% (n = 5) and other oral care methods not specified 12% (n = 23). 44% (n = 85) of patients had an oral assessment within the 24-h period and variable assessment methods were used. CONCLUSION There is large variability in oral care provision and methods for intubated ICU patients and a lack of consensus was revealed in the study. Oral assessment is conducted less frequently using multiple tools. Optimal oral care standards and further research into oral care provision is pivotal to address this important patient-relevant practice. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Oral care is a fundamental part of care for ICU patients, however, there is a large degree of variability, and oral care is often not based upon oral assessment. The use of an oral care protocol and oral assessments would help to improve patient care, ease of use for staff and provide a tailored oral care plan for patients, improving efficiency and preventing wasted resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niamh Kelly
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Nicki Credland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Louise Stayt
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | - Christine Causey
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Lewis Winning
- Division of Restorative Dentistry & Periodontology, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Daniel F McAuley
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Fionnuala T Lundy
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Ikhlas El Karim
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Causey C, El Karim I, Blackwood B, McAuley DF, Lundy FT. Quantitative oral health assessments in mechanically ventilated patients: A scoping review. Nurs Crit Care 2023; 28:756-772. [PMID: 35771584 DOI: 10.1111/nicc.12789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral health is a key contributor to a person's overall health. Previous studies indicate that oral health deteriorates throughout ventilation and may contribute to the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Oral health at the time of initial ventilation may impact on this deterioration. AIMS To determine the quantitative clinical assessment methods used to measure oral health and what is currently known regarding the oral health of patients at the time of initial ventilation. STUDY DESIGN A systematic literature search using electronic bibliographic databases MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library was undertaken for this scoping review. Studies were included if patients were >18 years old and mechanically ventilated for <48 h at the time of the first oral assessment. RESULTS In total, 12 studies were included. The review demonstrates a limited understanding of clinical oral health at the time of initial ventilation. Significant variation in both assessment methods and reporting of oral health makes comparison of results difficult resulting in a poor overall understanding of oral health at the time of intubation. CONCLUSION Standardized assessment and reporting methods may improve clinical application of findings and help direct future research. We suggest developing a core outcome set to ensure consistent use of assessment tools as well as standardized reporting of results. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE It is essential that a good understanding of oral health at the time of initial ventilation is gained so that patients receive more targeted oral hygiene intervention in ICU, potentially leading to improved patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Causey
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | - Ikhlas El Karim
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | - Daniel F McAuley
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | - Fionnuala T Lundy
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Musalia M, Laha S, Cazalilla-Chica J, Allan J, Roach L, Twamley J, Nanda S, Verlander M, Williams A, Kempe I, Patel II, Campbell-West F, Blackwood B, McAuley DF. A user evaluation of speech/phrase recognition software in critically ill patients: a DECIDE-AI feasibility study. Crit Care 2023; 27:277. [PMID: 37430313 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04420-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Evaluating effectiveness of speech/phrase recognition software in critically ill patients with speech impairments. DESIGN Prospective study. SETTING Tertiary hospital critical care unit in the northwest of England. PARTICIPANTS 14 patients with tracheostomies, 3 female and 11 male. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Evaluation of dynamic time warping (DTW) and deep neural networks (DNN) methods in a speech/phrase recognition application. Using speech/phrase recognition app for voice impaired (SRAVI), patients attempted mouthing various supported phrases with recordings evaluated by both DNN and DTW processing methods. Then, a trio of potential recognition phrases was displayed on the screen, ranked from first to third in order of likelihood. RESULTS A total of 616 patient recordings were taken with 516 phrase identifiable recordings. The overall results revealed a total recognition accuracy across all three ranks of 86% using the DNN method. The rank 1 recognition accuracy of the DNN method was 75%. The DTW method had a total recognition accuracy of 74%, with a rank 1 accuracy of 48%. CONCLUSION This feasibility evaluation of a novel speech/phrase recognition app using SRAVI demonstrated a good correlation between spoken phrases and app recognition. This suggests that speech/phrase recognition technology could be a therapeutic option to bridge the gap in communication in critically ill patients. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS TOPIC Communication can be attempted using visual charts, eye gaze boards, alphabet boards, speech/phrase reading, gestures and speaking valves in critically ill patients with speech impairments. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS Deep neural networks and dynamic time warping methods can be used to analyse lip movements and identify intended phrases. HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE AND POLICY Our study shows that speech/phrase recognition software has a role to play in bridging the communication gap in speech impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Musalia
- Critical Care Unit, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - S Laha
- Critical Care Unit, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.
- Faculty of Health and Care, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
| | - J Cazalilla-Chica
- Critical Care Unit, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - J Allan
- Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - L Roach
- Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - J Twamley
- Critical Care Unit, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - S Nanda
- Critical Care Unit, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - M Verlander
- Critical Care Unit, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - A Williams
- Critical Care Unit, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - I Kempe
- Critical Care Unit, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - I I Patel
- Critical Care Unit, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | | | - B Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - D F McAuley
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Grasselli G, Calfee CS, Camporota L, Poole D, Amato MBP, Antonelli M, Arabi YM, Baroncelli F, Beitler JR, Bellani G, Bellingan G, Blackwood B, Bos LDJ, Brochard L, Brodie D, Burns KEA, Combes A, D'Arrigo S, De Backer D, Demoule A, Einav S, Fan E, Ferguson ND, Frat JP, Gattinoni L, Guérin C, Herridge MS, Hodgson C, Hough CL, Jaber S, Juffermans NP, Karagiannidis C, Kesecioglu J, Kwizera A, Laffey JG, Mancebo J, Matthay MA, McAuley DF, Mercat A, Meyer NJ, Moss M, Munshi L, Myatra SN, Ng Gong M, Papazian L, Patel BK, Pellegrini M, Perner A, Pesenti A, Piquilloud L, Qiu H, Ranieri MV, Riviello E, Slutsky AS, Stapleton RD, Summers C, Thompson TB, Valente Barbas CS, Villar J, Ware LB, Weiss B, Zampieri FG, Azoulay E, Cecconi M. ESICM guidelines on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, phenotyping and respiratory support strategies. Intensive Care Med 2023; 49:727-759. [PMID: 37326646 PMCID: PMC10354163 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-023-07050-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 97.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The aim of these guidelines is to update the 2017 clinical practice guideline (CPG) of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). The scope of this CPG is limited to adult patients and to non-pharmacological respiratory support strategies across different aspects of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), including ARDS due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). These guidelines were formulated by an international panel of clinical experts, one methodologist and patients' representatives on behalf of the ESICM. The review was conducted in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement recommendations. We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence and grade recommendations and the quality of reporting of each study based on the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) network guidelines. The CPG addressed 21 questions and formulates 21 recommendations on the following domains: (1) definition; (2) phenotyping, and respiratory support strategies including (3) high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNO); (4) non-invasive ventilation (NIV); (5) tidal volume setting; (6) positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuvers (RM); (7) prone positioning; (8) neuromuscular blockade, and (9) extracorporeal life support (ECLS). In addition, the CPG includes expert opinion on clinical practice and identifies the areas of future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Grasselli
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - Carolyn S Calfee
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Luigi Camporota
- Department of Adult Critical Care, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Daniele Poole
- Operative Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, S. Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Antonelli
- Department of Anesthesiology Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Yaseen M Arabi
- Intensive Care Department, Ministry of the National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Francesca Baroncelli
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Jeremy R Beitler
- Center for Acute Respiratory Failure and Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Giacomo Bellani
- Centre for Medical Sciences - CISMed, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Geoff Bellingan
- Intensive Care Medicine, University College London, NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Lieuwe D J Bos
- Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laurent Brochard
- Keenan Research Center, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Daniel Brodie
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Karen E A Burns
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, Unity Health Toronto - Saint Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Alain Combes
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, F-75013, Paris, France
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, APHP Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, F-75013, Paris, France
| | - Sonia D'Arrigo
- Department of Anesthesiology Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniel De Backer
- Department of Intensive Care, CHIREC Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alexandre Demoule
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Paris, France
- AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, site Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Médecine Intensive - Réanimation (Département R3S), Paris, France
| | - Sharon Einav
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center and Hebrew University Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Eddy Fan
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Niall D Ferguson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Respirology and Critical Care, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Departments of Medicine and Physiology, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jean-Pierre Frat
- CHU De Poitiers, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Poitiers, France
- INSERM, CIC-1402, IS-ALIVE, Université de Poitiers, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie, Poitiers, France
| | - Luciano Gattinoni
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Claude Guérin
- University of Lyon, Lyon, France
- Institut Mondor de Recherches Biomédicales, INSERM 955 CNRS 7200, Créteil, France
| | - Margaret S Herridge
- Critical Care and Respiratory Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto General Research Institute, Institute of Medical Sciences, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Carol Hodgson
- The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Center, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Catherine L Hough
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Samir Jaber
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Department (DAR-B), Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, University of Montpellier, Research Unit: PhyMedExp, INSERM U-1046, CNRS, 34295, Montpellier, France
| | - Nicole P Juffermans
- Laboratory of Translational Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian Karagiannidis
- Department of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Cologne-Merheim Hospital, ARDS and ECMO Centre, Kliniken Der Stadt Köln gGmbH, Witten/Herdecke University Hospital, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jozef Kesecioglu
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arthur Kwizera
- Makerere University College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Kampala, Uganda
| | - John G Laffey
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Galway University Hospitals, Saolta University Hospitals Groups, Galway, Ireland
| | - Jordi Mancebo
- Intensive Care Department, Hospital Universitari de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael A Matthay
- Departments of Medicine and Anesthesia, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniel F McAuley
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
- Regional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Alain Mercat
- Département de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU d'Angers, Université d'Angers, Angers, France
| | - Nuala J Meyer
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Marc Moss
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Laveena Munshi
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sheila N Myatra
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Michelle Ng Gong
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laurent Papazian
- Bastia General Hospital Intensive Care Unit, Bastia, France
- Aix-Marseille University, Faculté de Médecine, Marseille, France
| | - Bhakti K Patel
- Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mariangela Pellegrini
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anders Perner
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Antonio Pesenti
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Lise Piquilloud
- Adult Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Haibo Qiu
- Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Marco V Ranieri
- Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, IRCCS Policlinico di Sant'Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Elisabeth Riviello
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Arthur S Slutsky
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Renee D Stapleton
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Charlotte Summers
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge Medical School, Cambridge, UK
| | - Taylor B Thompson
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carmen S Valente Barbas
- University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jesús Villar
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Research Unit, Hospital Universitario Dr. Negrin, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Lorraine B Ware
- Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Björn Weiss
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM CVK), Charitè - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fernando G Zampieri
- Academic Research Organization, Albert Einstein Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Elie Azoulay
- Médecine Intensive et Réanimation, APHP, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Maurizio Cecconi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hayes K, Harding S, Buckley K, Blackwood B, Latour JM. Exploring the Experiences of Family Members When a Patient Is Admitted to the ICU with a Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4197. [PMID: 37445232 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The needs of family members of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) with a severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) remain unmet. To date, no review has been performed to explore the experiences of relatives of adults who have been admitted to the ICU for treatment of a TBI. The aim of this scoping review is to explore and map the evidence of the experiences of family members when an adult relative is admitted to an ICU with a severe TBI. This review follows a combination of guidelines from Arksey and O'Malley and the Joanna Briggs Institute. Five electronic databases, Medline, Emcare, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycInfo were searched in February 2023, as were a number of grey literature sources. The population, concepts, and context framework were used to define the inclusion and exclusion criteria. From 4077 records, nine studies were retained, which represented seven discrete studies. The experiences of family members were thematically analyzed. The narrative synthesis of findings revealed three themes: communication with the clinical team, uncertainty, and involvement in care. These results offer richness and depth of understanding to clinicians regarding the experiences of families during this traumatic time. This review provides direction for targeted interventions aimed at supporting family members while in the ICU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kati Hayes
- Research and Development Department, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Sam Harding
- Research and Development Department, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Kirsten Buckley
- Learning and Research Centre, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- The Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queens University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK
| | - Jos M Latour
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth 6845, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Alnajada A, Blackwood B, Messer B, Pavlov I, Shyamsundar M. International Survey of High-Flow Nasal Therapy Use for Respiratory Failure in Adult Patients. J Clin Med 2023; 12:3911. [PMID: 37373606 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12123911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: High-flow nasal therapy (HFNT) has shown several benefits in addressing respiratory failure. However, the quality of evidence and the guidance for safe practice are lacking. This survey aimed to understand HFNT practice and the needs of the clinical community to support safe practice. (2) Method: A survey questionnaire was developed and distributed to relevant healthcare professionals through national networks in the UK, USA and Canada; responses were collected between October 2020 and April 2021. (3) Results: In the UK and Canada, HFNT was used in 95% of hospitals, with the highest use being in the emergency department. HNFT was widely used outside of a critical care setting. HFNT was mostly used to treat acute type 1 respiratory failure (98%), followed by acute type 2 respiratory failure and chronic respiratory failure. Guideline development was felt to be important (96%) and urgent (81%). Auditing of practice was lacking in 71% of hospitals. In the USA, HFNT was broadly similar to UK and Canadian practice. (4) Conclusions: The survey results reveal several key points: (a) HFNT is used in clinical conditions with limited evidence; (b) there is a lack of auditing; (c) it is used in wards that may not have the appropriate skill mix; and (d) there is a lack of guidance for HFNT use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asem Alnajada
- Wellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK
- Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz College for Emergency Medical Services, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK
| | - Ben Messer
- The North East Assisted Ventilation Service, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle NE14LP, UK
| | - Ivan Pavlov
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hôpital de Verdun, Montréal, QC H4G 2A3, Canada
| | - Murali Shyamsundar
- Wellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK
- Regional Intensive Care, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Verghis R, Blackwood B, McDowell C, Toner P, Hadfield D, Gordon AC, Clarke M, McAuley D. Heterogeneity of surrogate outcome measures used in critical care studies: A systematic review. Clin Trials 2023; 20:307-318. [PMID: 36946422 PMCID: PMC10617004 DOI: 10.1177/17407745231151842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The choice of outcome measure is a critical decision in the design of any clinical trial, but many Phase III clinical trials in critical care fail to detect a difference between the interventions being compared. This may be because the surrogate outcomes used to show beneficial effects in early phase trials (which informed the design of the subsequent Phase III trials) are not valid guides to the differences between the interventions for the main outcomes of the Phase III trials. We undertook a systematic review (1) to generate a list of outcome measures used in critical care trials, (2) to determine the variability in the outcome reporting in the respiratory subgroup and (3) to create a smaller list of potential early phase endpoints in the respiratory subgroup. METHODS Data related to outcomes were extracted from studies published in the six top-ranked critical care journals between 2010 and 2020. Outcomes were classified into subcategories and categories. A subset of early phase endpoints relevant to the respiratory subgroup was selected for further investigation. The variability of the outcomes and the variability in reporting was investigated. RESULTS A total of 6905 references were retrieved and a total of 294 separate outcomes were identified from 58 studies. The outcomes were then classified into 11 categories and 66 subcategories. A subset of 22 outcomes relevant for the respiratory group were identified as potential early phase outcomes. The summary statistics, time points and definitions show the outcomes are analysed and reported in different ways. CONCLUSION The outcome measures were defined, analysed and reported in a variety of ways. This creates difficulties for synthesising data in systematic reviews and planning definitive trials. This review once again highlights an urgent need for standardisation and validation of surrogate outcomes reported in critical care trials. Future work should aim to validate and develop a core outcome set for surrogate outcomes in critical care trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rejina Verghis
- The Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- The Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | - Philip Toner
- The Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Daniel Hadfield
- Critical Care Unit, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Anthony C Gordon
- Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Mike Clarke
- Centre of Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Daniel McAuley
- The Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
McGuigan PJ, Giallongo E, Blackwood B, Doidge J, Harrison DA, Nichol AD, Rowan KM, Shankar-Hari M, Skrifvars MB, Thomas K, McAuley DF. Publisher Correction: The effect of blood pressure on mortality following out‑of‑hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective cohort study of the United Kingdom Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre database. Crit Care 2023; 27:169. [PMID: 37143141 PMCID: PMC10161573 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04458-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J McGuigan
- Regional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK.
- Wellcome‑Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.
| | - Elisa Giallongo
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome‑Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | - James Doidge
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London, UK
| | - David A Harrison
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London, UK
| | - Alistair D Nichol
- University College Dublin Clinical Research Centre, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kathryn M Rowan
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London, UK
| | - Manu Shankar-Hari
- Centre for Inflammation Research, Institute of Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Markus B Skrifvars
- Department of Emergency Care and Services, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Karen Thomas
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London, UK
| | - Danny F McAuley
- Regional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
- Wellcome‑Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Johnston B, Hill RA, Blackwood B, Lip GYH, Welters ID. Development of Core Outcome Sets for trials on the management of Atrial fi Brill Ation in Critically Unwell patient S (COS-ABACUS): a protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e067257. [PMID: 37120150 PMCID: PMC10186458 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in critically unwell patients. New-onset AF (NOAF) affects 5%-11% of all admissions and up to 46% admitted with septic shock. NOAF is associated with increased morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. Existing trials into the prevention and management of NOAF suffer from significant heterogeneity making comparisons and inferences limited. Core outcome sets (COS) aim to standardise outcome reporting, reduce inconsistency between trials and reduce outcome reporting bias. We aim to develop an internationally agreed COS for trials of interventions on the management of NOAF during critical illness. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Stakeholders including intensive care physicians, cardiologists and patients will be recruited from national and international critical care organisations. COS development will occur in five stages: (1) Outcomes included in trials, recent systematic reviews and surveys of clinician practice and patient focus groups will be extracted. (2) Extracted outcomes will inform a two-stage e-Delphi process and consensus meeting using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. (3) Outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) will be identified from the literature and a consensus meeting held to agree OMI for core outcomes. (4) Nominal group technique will be used in a final consensus meeting to the COS. (5) The findings of our COS will be published in peer-reviewed journals and implemented in future guidelines and intervention trials. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by the University of Liverpool ethics committee (Ref: 11 256, 21 June 2022), with a formal consent waiver and assumed consent. We will disseminate the finalised COS via national and international critical care organisations and publication in peer-reviewed journals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Johnston
- Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ruaraidh A Hill
- Liverpool Reviews & Implementation Group, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Queen's University Belfast Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Belfast, UK
| | - Gregory Y H Lip
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ingeborg D Welters
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Verghis RM, McDowell C, Blackwood B, Lee B, McAuley DF, Clarke M. Re-analysis of ventilator-free days (VFD) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) studies. Trials 2023; 24:183. [PMID: 36907882 PMCID: PMC10008713 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07190-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over recent decades, improvements in healthcare have reduced mortality and morbidity rates in many conditions. This has resulted, in part, from the identification of effective interventions in randomised trials, and in conducting such trials, a composite outcome measure (COM) with multiple components will increase event rates, which allows study completion with a smaller sample size. In critical care research, the COM "ventilator-free days" (VFD) combines mortality and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) into a single continuous measure, which can be analysed in a variety of ways. This study investigates the usefulness of Poisson and two-part Poisson models compared to t-distribution for the analysis of VFD. METHODS Data from four studies (ALbuterol for the Treatment of ALI (ALTA), Early vs. Delayed Enteral Nutrition (EDEN), Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibition with simvastatin in Acute Lung Injury (ALI) to reduce pulmonary dysfunction (HARP-2), Statins for Acutely Injured Lungs from Sepsis (SAILS)) were used for analysis, with the VFD results summarised using mean, standard deviation (SD), median, interquartile range (25th and 75th percentiles) and minimum and maximum values. The statistical analyses that are compared used the t-test, Poisson, zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) and two-part Logit-Poisson hurdle models. The analyses were exploratory in nature, and the significance level for differences in the estimates was set to 0.05. RESULTS In HARP-2, which compared simvastatin and placebo, the mean (SD) VFD for all patients was 12.0 (10.2), but this mean value did not represent the data distribution as it falls in a zone between two peaks, with the lowest frequency of occurrence. The mean (SD) VFD after excluding patients who died before day 28 and patients who did not achieve unassisted breathing were 15.9 (8.7) and 18.2 (6.6), respectively. The mean difference (95% CI) between the two groups was 1.1 (95% CI: 0.7 to 2.8; p = 0.20) based on an independent t-test. However, when the two-part hurdle model was used, the simvastatin arm had a significantly higher number of non-zero values compared to the placebo group, which indicated that more patients were alive and free of mechanical ventilation in the simvastatin group. Similarly, in ALTA, this model found that significantly more patients were alive and free of MV in the control group. In EDEN and SAILS, there was no significant difference between the control and intervention groups. CONCLUSION Our analyses show that the t-test and Poisson model are not appropriate for bi-modal data (such as VFD) where there is a large number of zero events. The two-part hurdle model was the most promising approach. There is a need for future research to investigate other analysis techniques, such as two-part quantile regression and to determine the impact on sample size requirements for comparative effectiveness trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rejina Mariam Verghis
- The Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, UK. .,GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK.
| | | | - Bronagh Blackwood
- The Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | - Bohee Lee
- Centre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Daniel F McAuley
- The Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.,Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Mike Clarke
- Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Belfast, UK.,Centre of Public Health, Institute of Clinical Science, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
McGuigan PJ, Edwards J, Blackwood B, Dark P, Doidge JC, Harrison DA, Kitchen G, Lawson I, Nichol AD, Rowan KM, Shankar-Hari M, McAuley DF, McGuigan PJ. The association between time of in hospital cardiac arrest and mortality; a retrospective analysis of two UK databases. Resuscitation 2023; 186:109750. [PMID: 36842674 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The incidence of in hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) varies throughout the day. This study aimed to report the variation in incidence of IHCA, presenting rhythm and outcome based on the hour in which IHCA occurred. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of the National Cardiac Arrest Audit (NCAA) including patients who suffered an IHCA from 1st April 2011 to 31st December 2019. We then linked the NCAA and intensive care Case Mix Programme databases to explore the effect of time of IHCA on hospital survival in the subgroup of patients admitted to intensive care following IHCA. RESULTS We identified 115,690 eligible patients in the NCAA database. Pulseless electrical activity was the commonest presenting rhythm (54.8%). 66,885 patients died in the immediate post resuscitation period. Overall, hospital survival in the NCAA cohort was 21.3%. We identified 13,858 patients with linked ICU admissions in the Case Mix Programme database; 37.0% survived to hospital discharge. The incidence of IHCA peaked at 06.00. Rates of return of spontaneous circulation, survival to hospital discharge and good neurological outcome were lowest between 05.00 and 07.00. Among those admitted to ICU, no clear diurnal variation in hospital survival was seen in the unadjusted or adjusted analysis. This pattern was consistent across all presenting rhythms. CONCLUSIONS We observed higher rates of IHCA, and poorer outcomes at night. However, in those admitted to ICU, this variation was absent. This suggests patient factors and processes of care issues contribute to the variation in IHCA seen throughout the day.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J McGuigan
- Regional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK; Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, UK.
| | - Julia Edwards
- Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, UK
| | - Paul Dark
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - James C Doidge
- Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London, UK
| | - David A Harrison
- Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London, UK
| | - Gareth Kitchen
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Izabella Lawson
- Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London, UK
| | - Alistair D Nichol
- University College Dublin Clinical Research Centre, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kathryn M Rowan
- Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London, UK
| | - Manu Shankar-Hari
- Centre for Inflammation Research, Institute of Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, UK; Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, UK
| | - Danny F McAuley
- Regional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK; Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, UK
| | - Peter J McGuigan
- Regional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK; Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
McGuigan PJ, Giallongo E, Blackwood B, Doidge J, Harrison DA, Nichol AD, Rowan KM, Shankar-Hari M, Skrifvars MB, Thomas K, McAuley DF. The effect of blood pressure on mortality following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective cohort study of the United Kingdom Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre database. Crit Care 2023; 27:4. [PMID: 36604745 PMCID: PMC9817239 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-04289-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypotension following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) may cause secondary brain injury and increase mortality rates. Current guidelines recommend avoiding hypotension. However, the optimal blood pressure following OHCA is unknown. We hypothesised that exposure to hypotension and hypertension in the first 24 h in ICU would be associated with mortality following OHCA. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of OHCA patients included in the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Case Mix Programme from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2019. Restricted cubic splines were created following adjustment for important prognostic variables. We report the adjusted odds ratio for associations between lowest and highest mean arterial pressure (MAP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) in the first 24 h of ICU care and hospital mortality. RESULTS A total of 32,349 patients were included in the analysis. Hospital mortality was 56.2%. The median lowest and highest MAP and SBP were similar in survivors and non-survivors. Both hypotension and hypertension were associated with increased mortality. Patients who had a lowest recorded MAP in the range 60-63 mmHg had the lowest associated mortality. Patients who had a highest recorded MAP in the range 95-104 mmHg had the lowest associated mortality. The association between SBP and mortality followed a similar pattern to MAP. CONCLUSIONS We found an association between hypotension and hypertension in the first 24 h in ICU and mortality following OHCA. The inability to distinguish between the median blood pressure of survivors and non-survivors indicates the need for research into individualised blood pressure targets for survivors following OHCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J McGuigan
- Regional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK.
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.
| | - Elisa Giallongo
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | - James Doidge
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London, UK
| | - David A Harrison
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London, UK
| | - Alistair D Nichol
- University College Dublin Clinical Research Centre, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kathryn M Rowan
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London, UK
| | - Manu Shankar-Hari
- Centre for Inflammation Research, Institute of Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Markus B Skrifvars
- Department of Emergency Care and Services, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Karen Thomas
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London, UK
| | - Danny F McAuley
- Regional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abu-Sultaneh S, Iyer NP, Fernández A, Gaies M, González-Dambrauskas S, Hotz JC, Kneyber MCJ, López-Fernández YM, Rotta AT, Werho DK, Baranwal AK, Blackwood B, Craven HJ, Curley MAQ, Essouri S, Fioretto JR, Hartmann SMM, Jouvet P, Korang SK, Rafferty GF, Ramnarayan P, Rose L, Tume LN, Whipple EC, Wong JJM, Emeriaud G, Mastropietro CW, Napolitano N, Newth CJL, Khemani RG. Executive Summary: International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pediatric Ventilator Liberation, A Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network Document. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2023; 207:17-28. [PMID: 36583619 PMCID: PMC9952867 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202204-0795so] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Pediatric-specific ventilator liberation guidelines are lacking despite the many studies exploring elements of extubation readiness testing. The lack of clinical practice guidelines has led to significant and unnecessary variation in methods used to assess pediatric patients' readiness for extubation. Methods: Twenty-six international experts comprised a multiprofessional panel to establish pediatrics-specific ventilator liberation clinical practice guidelines, focusing on acutely hospitalized children receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours. Eleven key questions were identified and first prioritized using the Modified Convergence of Opinion on Recommendations and Evidence. A systematic review was conducted for questions that did not meet an a priori threshold of ⩾80% agreement, with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodologies applied to develop the guidelines. The panel evaluated the evidence and drafted and voted on the recommendations. Measurements and Main Results: Three questions related to systematic screening using an extubation readiness testing bundle and a spontaneous breathing trial as part of the bundle met Modified Convergence of Opinion on Recommendations criteria of ⩾80% agreement. For the remaining eight questions, five systematic reviews yielded 12 recommendations related to the methods and duration of spontaneous breathing trials, measures of respiratory muscle strength, assessment of risk of postextubation upper airway obstruction and its prevention, use of postextubation noninvasive respiratory support, and sedation. Most recommendations were conditional and based on low to very low certainty of evidence. Conclusions: This clinical practice guideline provides a conceptual framework with evidence-based recommendations for best practices related to pediatric ventilator liberation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer Abu-Sultaneh
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Narayan Prabhu Iyer
- Fetal and Neonatal Institute, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Analía Fernández
- Pediatric Critical Care Unit, Acute Care General Hospital “Carlos G. Durand,” Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Michael Gaies
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center Heart Institute, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Sebastián González-Dambrauskas
- Red Colaborativa Pediátrica de Latinoamérica (LARed Network), Facultad de Medicina, Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos de Niños del Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Justin Christian Hotz
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Martin C. J. Kneyber
- Division of Paediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, Beatrix Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Yolanda M. López-Fernández
- Department of Pediatrics, Biocruces-Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Alexandre T. Rotta
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - David K. Werho
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Cardiothoracic Intensive Care, Rady Children’s Hospital, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Arun Kumar Baranwal
- Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah J. Craven
- Ruth Lilly Medical Library, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Martha A. Q. Curley
- Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Research Institute, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sandrine Essouri
- Department of Pediatrics, Sainte-Justine Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jose Roberto Fioretto
- Pediatric Critical Care Division, Department of Pediatrics, Botucatu Medical School, Sao Paulo State University, Botucatu, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Silvia M. M. Hartmann
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children’s Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Philippe Jouvet
- Department of Pediatrics, Sainte-Justine Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Steven Kwasi Korang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Capital Region of Denmark, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gerrard F. Rafferty
- Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, and
| | - Padmanabhan Ramnarayan
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Rose
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King’s College London, London United Kingdom
| | - Lyvonne N. Tume
- Edge Hill University Health Research Institute, Ormskirk, England
| | - Elizabeth C. Whipple
- Ruth Lilly Medical Library, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - Guillaume Emeriaud
- Department of Pediatrics, Sainte-Justine Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Christopher W. Mastropietro
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - Christopher J. L. Newth
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Robinder G. Khemani
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Millar JE, Boyle AJ, Drake TM, Adams CE, Glass AW, Blackwood B, McNamee JJ, McAuley DF. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a systematic review, Bayesian meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Eur Respir Rev 2022; 31:31/166/220030. [DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0030-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose:To assess the safety and efficacy of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R)versusstandard care in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF).Methods:MEDLINE, Embase and clinical trial registries were searched from 1994 to 31 December 2021. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Pairs of reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included ventilator-free days, length of stay, safety and adverse events and physiological changes. As a primary analysis, we performed a meta-analysis of mortality until day 30 using a Bayesian random effects model. We then performed a trial sequential analysis of RCTs.Results:21 studies met inclusion criteria: three RCTs, enrolling 531 patients, and 18 observational studies. In a pooled analysis of RCTs, the posterior probability of increased mortality with the use of ECCO2R was 73% (relative risk 1.19, 95% credible interval 0.70–2.29). There was substantial heterogeneity in the reporting of safety and adverse events. However, the incidence of extra and intracranial haemorrhage was higher (relative risk 3.00, 95% credible interval 0.41–20.51) among those randomised to ECCO2R. Current trials have accumulated 80.8% of the diversity-adjusted required information size and the lack of effect reaches futility for a 10% absolute risk reduction in mortality.Conclusions:The use of ECCO2R in patients with AHRF is not associated with improvements in clinical outcomes. Furthermore, it is likely that further trials of ECCO2R aiming to achieve an absolute risk reduction in mortality of ≥10% are futile.
Collapse
|
24
|
Abu-Sultaneh S, Iyer NP, Fernández A, Gaies M, González-Dambrauskas S, Hotz JC, Kneyber MCJ, López-Fernández YM, Rotta AT, Werho DK, Baranwal AK, Blackwood B, Craven HJ, Curley MAQ, Essouri S, Fioretto JR, Hartmann SMM, Jouvet P, Korang SK, Rafferty GF, Ramnarayan P, Rose L, Tume LN, Whipple EC, Wong JJM, Emeriaud G, Mastropietro CW, Napolitano N, Newth CJL, Khemani RG. Operational Definitions Related to Pediatric Ventilator Liberation. Chest 2022; 163:1130-1143. [PMID: 36563873 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Common, operational definitions are crucial to assess interventions and outcomes related to pediatric mechanical ventilation. These definitions can reduce unnecessary variability among research and quality improvement efforts, to ensure findings are generalizable, and can be pooled to establish best practices. RESEARCH QUESTION Can we establish operational definitions for key elements related to pediatric ventilator liberation using a combination of detailed literature review and consensus-based approaches? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS A panel of 26 international experts in pediatric ventilator liberation, two methodologists, and two librarians conducted systematic reviews on eight topic areas related to pediatric ventilator liberation. Through a series of virtual meetings, we established draft definitions that were voted upon using an anonymous web-based process. Definitions were revised by incorporating extracted data gathered during the systematic review and discussed in another consensus meeting. A second round of voting was conducted to confirm the final definitions. RESULTS In eight topic areas identified by the experts, 16 preliminary definitions were established. Based on initial discussion and the first round of voting, modifications were suggested for 11 of the 16 definitions. There was significant variability in how these items were defined in the literature reviewed. The final round of voting achieved ≥ 80% agreement for all 16 definitions in the following areas: what constitutes respiratory support (invasive mechanical ventilation and noninvasive respiratory support), liberation and failed attempts to liberate from invasive mechanical ventilation, liberation from respiratory support, duration of noninvasive respiratory support, total duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, spontaneous breathing trials, extubation readiness testing, 28 ventilator-free days, and planned vs rescue use of post-extubation noninvasive respiratory support. INTERPRETATION We propose that these consensus-based definitions for elements of pediatric ventilator liberation, informed by evidence, be used for future quality improvement initiatives and research studies to improve generalizability and facilitate comparison.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer Abu-Sultaneh
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
| | - Narayan Prabhu Iyer
- Fetal and Neonatal Institute, Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Analía Fernández
- Pediatric Critical Care Unit, Hospital General de Agudos "C. Durand" Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Michael Gaies
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Heart Institute, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Sebastián González-Dambrauskas
- Red Colaborativa Pediátrica de Latinoamérica (LARed Network) and Departamento de Pediatría Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos de Niños del Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Justin Christian Hotz
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Martin C J Kneyber
- Department of Paediatrics, Division of Paediatric Critical Care Medicine, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Yolanda M López-Fernández
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Critical Care Division, Cruces University Hospital, Biocruces-Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Alexandre T Rotta
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - David K Werho
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Cardiothoracic Intensive Care, UC San Diego, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA
| | - Arun Kumar Baranwal
- Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah J Craven
- Ruth Lilly Medical Library, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Martha A Q Curley
- Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA; Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sandrine Essouri
- Department of Pediatrics, Sainte-Justine Hospital, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jose Roberto Fioretto
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Critical Care Division, Botucatu Medical School-UNESP-São Paulo State University, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
| | - Silvia M M Hartmann
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital and University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Philippe Jouvet
- Department of Pediatrics, Sainte-Justine Hospital, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Steven Kwasi Korang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region of Denmark, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gerrard F Rafferty
- Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, England
| | - Padmanabhan Ramnarayan
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, England
| | - Louise Rose
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, England
| | - Lyvonne N Tume
- Edge Hill University Health Research Institute, Ormskirk, England
| | - Elizabeth C Whipple
- Ruth Lilly Medical Library, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | - Guillaume Emeriaud
- Department of Pediatrics, Sainte-Justine Hospital, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Christopher W Mastropietro
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | - Christopher J L Newth
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Robinder G Khemani
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Flim M, Rustøen T, Blackwood B, Spronk P. Thirst in adult patients in the intensive care unit: protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e063006. [PMID: 36446463 PMCID: PMC9710361 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Thirst is one of the most bothersome symptoms experienced by intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Effective diagnosis and management of thirst in the ICU is essential, particularly as patients are less sedated than previously and more aware of this problem. Currently, no overview of publications on thirst identification and management in ICU patients exists. The scoping review will address the broad question 'What is known about thirst as a symptom in adult critically ill patients?' It aims to provide an overview of the causes and risk factors, diagnosis and measurement, the symptom dimensions and its interaction with other symptoms, and thirst management. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology framework to guide the process and will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Methods include: defining the review questions, eligibility criteria, concepts of interest and context; and outlining the search strategy, study selection process, data extraction and analysis. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL will be searched from inception to April 2022. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is not required, as the scoping review will synthesise information from available publications. The scoping review will be submitted for publication to a scientific journal, presented at relevant conferences and disseminated as part of future workshops with ICU support groups and the critical care professional community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marleen Flim
- Intensive Care, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
- Expertise centre for Intensive Care Rehabilitation Apeldoorn (ExpIRA), Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Tone Rustøen
- Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research and Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo universitetssykehus Ulleval, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Peter Spronk
- Intensive Care, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
- Expertise centre for Intensive Care Rehabilitation Apeldoorn (ExpIRA), Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rubulotta F, Brett S, Boulanger C, Blackwood B, Deschepper M, Labeau SO, Blot S. Prevalence of skin pressure injury in critical care patients in the UK: results of a single-day point prevalence evaluation in adult critically ill patients. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e057010. [PMID: 36418122 PMCID: PMC9685232 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (PIs) are a source of morbidity and mortality, and many are potentially preventable. DESIGN This study prospectively evaluated the prevalence and the associated factors of PIs in adult critical care patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) in the UK. SETTING This service evaluation was part of a larger, international, single-day point prevalence study of PIs in adult ICU patients. Training was provided to healthcare givers using an electronic platform to ensure standardised recognition and staging of PIs across all sites. PARTICIPANTS The characteristics of the ICUs were recorded before the survey; deidentified patient data were collected using a case report form and uploaded onto a secure online platform. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Factors associated with ICU-acquired PIs in the UK were analysed descriptively and using mixed multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Data from 1312 adult patients admitted to 94 UK ICUs were collected. The proportion of individuals with at least one PI was 16% (211 out of 1312 patients), of whom 8.8% (n=115/1312) acquired one or more PIs in the ICU and 7.3% (n=96/1312) prior to ICU admission. The total number of PIs was 311, of which 148 (47.6%) were acquired in the ICU. The location of majority of these PIs was the sacral area, followed by the heels. Braden score and prior length of ICU stay were associated with PI development. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence and the stage of severity of PIs were generally low in adult critically ill patients admitted to participating UK ICUs during the study period. However, PIs are a problem in an important minority of patients. Lower Braden score and longer length of ICU stay were associated with the development of injuries; most ICUs assess risk using tools which do not account for this. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03270345.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Rubulotta
- Intensive Care Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Anaesthetics and Intensive Care, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Brett
- Anaesthetics and Intensive Care, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | | | - Stijn Blot
- Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Beecher C, Toomey E, Maeso B, Whiting C, Stewart DC, Worrall A, Elliott J, Smith M, Tierney T, Blackwood B, Maguire T, Kampman M, Ling B, Gill C, Healy P, Houghton C, Booth A, Garritty C, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Burke NN, Keenan C, Devane D. Priority III: top 10 rapid review methodology research priorities identified using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership. J Clin Epidemiol 2022; 151:151-160. [PMID: 36038041 PMCID: PMC9487890 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A rapid review is a form of evidence synthesis considered a resource-efficient alternative to the conventional systematic review. Despite a dramatic rise in the number of rapid reviews commissioned and conducted in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, published evidence on the optimal methods of planning, doing, and sharing the results of these reviews is lacking. The Priority III study aimed to identify the top 10 unanswered questions on rapid review methodology to be addressed by future research. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING A modified James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership approach was adopted. This approach used two online surveys and a virtual prioritization workshop with patients and the public, reviewers, researchers, clinicians, policymakers, and funders to identify and prioritize unanswered questions. RESULTS Patients and the public, researchers, reviewers, clinicians, policymakers, and funders identified and prioritized the top 10 unanswered research questions about rapid review methodology. Priorities were identified throughout the entire review process, from stakeholder involvement and formulating the question, to the methods of a systematic review that are appropriate to use, through to the dissemination of results. CONCLUSION The results of the Priority III study will inform the future research agenda on rapid review methodology. We hope this will enhance the quality of evidence produced by rapid reviews, which will ultimately inform decision-making in the context of healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Beecher
- Evidence Synthesis Ireland and Cochrane Ireland, Galway, Ireland,School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland,HRB-Trials Methodology Research Network, Galway, Ireland,Corresponding author. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Aras Moyola, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland. Tel.: +353 91 493854
| | - Elaine Toomey
- School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Beccy Maeso
- James Lind Alliance, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Whiting
- James Lind Alliance, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Andrew Worrall
- Public co-author, Evidence Synthesis Ireland, Galway, Ireland,Public co-author, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Jim Elliott
- Public co-author, Evidence Synthesis Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Maureen Smith
- Public co-author, Cochrane Consumer Network Executive, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Theresa Tierney
- Patient Partner, HRB Primary Care Clinical Trials Network Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Patricia Healy
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | | | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health And Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | - James Thomas
- EPPI-Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea C. Tricco
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, 209 Victoria St, M5B 1T8 Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Epidemiology Division and Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St Room 500, M5T 3M7 Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Queen's Collaboration for Health Care Quality JBI Centre of Excellence, School of Nursing, Queen's University, 99 University Ave, K7L 3N6 Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nikita N. Burke
- Evidence Synthesis Ireland and Cochrane Ireland, Galway, Ireland,School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Ciara Keenan
- Campbell UK & Ireland, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Declan Devane
- Evidence Synthesis Ireland and Cochrane Ireland, Galway, Ireland,School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland,HRB-Trials Methodology Research Network, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ramnarayan P, Blackwood B, Khemani RG. What's new in paediatric ventilator liberation? Intensive Care Med 2022; 48:1635-1637. [PMID: 36048243 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06865-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Padmanabhan Ramnarayan
- Anaesthesia, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Room 508, Imperial College Medical School Building, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PB, UK.
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Robinder G Khemani
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Pediatrics, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Schults JA, Charles K, Harnischfeger J, Erikson S, Burren J, Waak M, Blackwood B, Tume LN, Long D. Ventilator weaning and extubation practices in critically ill children: An Australian and New Zealand survey of practice. Aust Crit Care 2022:S1036-7314(22)00090-X. [PMID: 36038459 DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to (i) describe current weaning and extubation practices in children (protocols to identify weaning candidates, spontaneous breathing trials, and other aspects of care such as sedation weaning) and (ii) understand responsibilities for ventilation weaning decisions across Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). METHODS A cross-sectional survey of ANZ intensive care units who routinely intubate and ventilate children (<18 years) was conducted. We worked with the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Paediatric Study Group to identify units and potential respondents (senior nurse representative per unit) and to administer questionnaires. Survey questions (n = 35) examined current protocols, practices, unit staffing, and decision-making responsibilities for ventilation weaning and extubation. Open-ended questions examined respondents' experiences of weaning and extubation. RESULTS A senior nursing respondent from 18/22 intensive care units (82%) completed the survey. Across units, most used sedation assessment tools (88%), and less often, sedation weaning tools (55%). Spontaneous awakening protocols were not used; one unit (5%) reported the use of a spontaneous breathing protocol. Two respondents reported that ventilation weaning protocols (11%) were in use, with 44% of units reporting the use of extubation protocols. Weaning and extubation practices were largely perceived as medically driven, with qualitative data demonstrating a desire from most respondents for greater shared decision-making. CONCLUSION In ANZ, ventilation weaning and extubation practices are largely medically driven with variation in the use of protocols to support mechanical ventilation weaning and extubation in children. Our findings highlight the importance of future research to determine the impact of greater collaboration of the multidisciplinary team on weaning practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A Schults
- Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia; Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Karina Charles
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jane Harnischfeger
- Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Simon Erikson
- Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Juerg Burren
- University Children's Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michaela Waak
- Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Centre for Children's Health Research, the University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Lyvonne N Tume
- School of Health & Society, University of Salford, Manchester, UK; Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Debbie Long
- Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Nursing, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abu-Sultaneh S, Iyer NP, Fernández A, Gaies M, González-Dambrauskas S, Hotz JC, Kneyber MCJ, López-Fernández YM, Rotta AT, Werho DK, Baranwal AK, Blackwood B, Craven HJ, Curley MAQ, Essouri S, Fioretto JR, Hartmann SM, Jouvet P, Korang SK, Rafferty GF, Ramnarayan P, Rose L, Tume LN, Whipple EC, Wong JJM, Emeriaud G, Mastropietro CW, Napolitano N, Newth CJL, Khemani RG. Executive Summary: International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pediatric Ventilator Liberation, A PALISI Network Document. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2022. [PMID: 35969419 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202204-0795oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Pediatric specific ventilator liberation guidelines are lacking despite the many studies exploring elements of extubation readiness testing. The lack of clinical practice guidelines has led to significant and unnecessary variation in methods used to assess pediatric patients' readiness for extubation. METHODS Twenty-six international experts comprised a multi-professional panel to establish pediatric specific ventilator liberation clinical practice guidelines, focusing on acutely hospitalized children receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours. Eleven key questions were identified and first prioritized using the Modified Convergence of Opinion on Recommendations and Evidence. Systematic review was conducted for questions which did not meet an a-priori threshold of ≥80% agreement, with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodologies applied to develop the guidelines. The panel evaluated the evidence, drafted, and voted on the recommendations. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Three questions related to systematic screening, using an extubation readiness testing bundle and use of a spontaneous breathing trial as part of the bundle met Modified Convergence of Opinion on Recommendations criteria of ≥80% agreement. For the remaining 8 questions, 5 systematic reviews yielded 12 recommendations related to the methods and duration of spontaneous breathing trials; measures of respiratory muscle strength; assessment of risk of post-extubation upper airway obstruction and its prevention; use of post-extubation non-invasive respiratory support; and sedation. Most recommendations were conditional and based on low to very low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSION This clinical practice guideline provides a conceptual framework with evidence-based recommendations for best practices related to pediatric ventilator liberation. This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer Abu-Sultaneh
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.,Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States;
| | - Narayan Prabhu Iyer
- University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Los Angeles, California, United States.,Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Fetal and Neonatal Institute, Division of Neonatology, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Analía Fernández
- Hospital General de Agudos "C. Durand" Ciudad Autónoma de, Pediatric Critical Care Unit, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Michael Gaies
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Department of pediatrics, Division of pediatric cardiology , Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.,Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Heart Institute, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| | - Sebastián González-Dambrauskas
- Red Colaborativa Pediátrica de Latinoamérica (LARed Network), Montevideo, Uruguay.,Universidad de la República Facultad de Medicina, Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos de Niños del Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell (UCIN-CHPR), Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Justin Christian Hotz
- Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Martin C J Kneyber
- University Medical Centre Groningen Beatrix Childrens Hospital, Department of Paediatrics, Division of Paediatric Critical Care Medicine, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Yolanda M López-Fernández
- Hospital Universitario Cruces, Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Intensive Care, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.,Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Alexandre T Rotta
- Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - David K Werho
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, San Diego, California, United States.,Rady Children's Hospital, Cardiothoracic Intensive Care, San Diego, California, United States
| | - Arun Kumar Baranwal
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Department of Pediatrics, Chandigarh, India
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Queen's University Belfast, Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Belfast, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Hannah J Craven
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Ruth Lilly Medical Library, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
| | - Martha A Q Curley
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Family and Community Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.,The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Research Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Sandrine Essouri
- Université de Montréal, Department of Pediatrics, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Saint Justine Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jose Roberto Fioretto
- UNESP - Sao Paulo State University, Botucatu Medical School, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Sao Paulo, Botucatu-SP, Brazil
| | - Silvia Mm Hartmann
- University of Washington, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.,Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - Philippe Jouvet
- Université de Montréal, Department of Pediatrics, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Saint Justine Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Steven Kwasi Korang
- Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Los Angeles, California, United States.,Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region of Denmark, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gerrard F Rafferty
- King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences (CHAPS), London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Padmanabhan Ramnarayan
- Imperial College London, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Louise Rose
- King's College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Lyvonne N Tume
- Edge Hill University Health Research Institute, Ormskirk, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Elizabeth C Whipple
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Ruth Lilly Medical Library, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
| | - Judith Ju Ming Wong
- KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Children's Intensive Care Unit, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Guillaume Emeriaud
- Université de Montréal, Department of Pediatrics, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Saint Justine Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Christopher W Mastropietro
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.,Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
| | - Natalie Napolitano
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Christopher J L Newth
- University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States.,Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Robinder G Khemani
- University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States.,Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Los Angeles, California, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
McIlmurray L, Blackwood B, Dempster M, Kee F, Gillan C, Hagan R, Lohfeld L, Shyamsundar M. Electronic nudge tool technology used in the critical care and peri-anaesthetic setting: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e057026. [PMID: 35820751 PMCID: PMC9277380 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Electronic clinical decision support (eCDS) tools are used to assist clinical decision making. Using computer-generated algorithms with evidence-based rule sets, they alert clinicians to events that require attention. eCDS tools generating alerts using nudge principles present clinicians with evidence-based clinical treatment options to guide clinician behaviour without restricting freedom of choice. Although eCDS tools have shown beneficial outcomes, challenges exist with regard to their acceptability most likely related to implementation. Furthermore, the pace of progress in this field has allowed little time to effectively evaluate the experience of the intended user. This scoping review aims to examine the development and implementation strategies, and the impact on the end user of eCDS tools that generate alerts using nudge principles, specifically in the critical care and peri-anaesthetic setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This review will follow the Arksey and O'Malley framework. A search will be conducted of literature published in the last 15 years in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science and SAGE databases. Citation screening and data extraction will be performed by two independent reviewers. Extracted data will include context, e-nudge tool type and design features, development, implementation strategies and associated impact on end users. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This scoping review will synthesise published literature therefore ethical approval is not required. Review findings will be published in topic relevant peer-reviewed journals and associated conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa McIlmurray
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Martin Dempster
- Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life (CIHRQoL) - School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Frank Kee
- UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health (NI), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Charles Gillan
- School of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Rachael Hagan
- School of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Lynne Lohfeld
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Murali Shyamsundar
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Tume LN, Blackwood B, McAuley DF, Morris K, Peters MJ, Jordan J, Walsh TS, McIlmurray L. Using the TIDieR checklist to describe the intervention of the Sedation and Weaning in Children (SANDWICH) trial. Nurs Crit Care 2022; 28:396-403. [PMID: 35733409 DOI: 10.1111/nicc.12810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Published reports of complex interventions in randomized controlled trials often lack sufficient detail to allow trial replication and adoption into practice. AIM The aim of this paper is to describe our experience of using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist in reporting a recent trial of sedation and ventilation weaning in critically ill children (the Sedation and Weaning in Children [SANDWICH] trial). METHODS The TIDieR 12-point checklist has been used to detail and describe the specific SANDWICH trial intervention and methods of implementation. RESULTS/DISCUSSION Overall, we found the checklist a useful tool to direct and ensure consistency of reporting of our complex intervention used in a multi-centre clinical trial. We experienced some minor limitations in classifying training materials and delivery mode into one item because of the overlapping nature of this component. CONCLUSION Using the TIDieR checklist to report complex interventions tested in trials provides a structured, systematic way of describing necessary detail. This allows clinicians to understand the theory behind the intervention, how it should be delivered, and the resources required. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE The SANDWICH intervention had a significant beneficial effect on reducing time on ventilation for children. The detailed description of the team-based intervention will aid replication, implementation and monitoring of fidelity in other paediatric intensive care units.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyvonne N Tume
- School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Manchester, UK.,Paedaitric Intensive Care Unit, Alder Hey Children's NHS FT, Liverpool, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | - Daniel F McAuley
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | - Kevin Morris
- PICU, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, England, UK.,PICU, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, UK
| | - Mark J Peters
- Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, UK.,Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University College London, London, England, UK
| | - Joanne Jordan
- PICU, Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies, School of Health, Wellbeing and Social Care, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
| | - Timothy Simon Walsh
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lisa McIlmurray
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.,Children's Health Ireland at Temple Street Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Blackwood B, Morris KP, Jordan J, McIlmurray L, Agus A, Boyle R, Clarke M, Easter C, Feltbower RG, Hemming K, Macrae D, McDowell C, Murray M, Parslow R, Peters MJ, Phair G, Tume LN, Walsh TS, McAuley DF. Co-ordinated multidisciplinary intervention to reduce time to successful extubation for children on mechanical ventilation: the SANDWICH cluster stepped-wedge RCT. Health Technol Assess 2022; 26:1-114. [PMID: 35289741 DOI: 10.3310/tcfx3817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Daily assessment of patient readiness for liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation can reduce the duration of ventilation. However, there is uncertainty about the effectiveness of this in a paediatric population. OBJECTIVES To determine the effect of a ventilation liberation intervention in critically ill children who are anticipated to have a prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation (primary objective) and in all children (secondary objective). DESIGN A pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster randomised trial with economic and process evaluations. SETTING Paediatric intensive care units in the UK. PARTICIPANTS Invasively mechanically ventilated children (aged < 16 years). INTERVENTIONS The intervention incorporated co-ordinated multidisciplinary care, patient-relevant sedation plans linked to sedation assessment, assessment of ventilation parameters with a higher than usual trigger for undertaking an extubation readiness test and a spontaneous breathing trial on low levels of respiratory support to test extubation readiness. The comparator was usual care. Hospital sites were randomised sequentially to transition from control to intervention and were non-blinded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation until the first successful extubation. The secondary outcome measures were successful extubation, unplanned extubation and reintubation, post-extubation use of non-invasive ventilation, tracheostomy, post-extubation stridor, adverse events, length of intensive care and hospital stay, mortality and cost per respiratory complication avoided at 28 days. RESULTS The trial included 10,495 patient admissions from 18 paediatric intensive care units from 5 February 2018 to 14 October 2019. In children with anticipated prolonged ventilation (n = 8843 admissions: control, n = 4155; intervention, n = 4688), the intervention resulted in a significantly shorter time to successful extubation [cluster and time-adjusted median difference -6.1 hours (interquartile range -8.2 to -5.3 hours); adjusted hazard ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.20; p = 0.02] and a higher incidence of successful extubation (adjusted relative risk 1.01, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.02; p = 0.03) and unplanned extubation (adjusted relative risk 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 2.51; p = 0.03), but not reintubation (adjusted relative risk 1.10, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.36; p = 0.38). In the intervention period, the use of post-extubation non-invasive ventilation was significantly higher (adjusted relative risk 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.49; p = 0.04), with no evidence of a difference in intensive care length of stay or other harms, but hospital length of stay was longer (adjusted hazard ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.81 to 0.97; p = 0.01). Findings for all children were broadly similar. The control period was associated with lower, but not statistically significantly lower, total costs (cost difference, mean £929.05, 95% confidence interval -£516.54 to £2374.64) and significantly fewer respiratory complications avoided (mean difference -0.10, 95% confidence interval -0.16 to -0.03). LIMITATIONS The unblinded intervention assignment may have resulted in performance or detection bias. It was not possible to determine which components were primarily responsible for the observed effect. Treatment effect in a more homogeneous group remains to be determined. CONCLUSIONS The intervention resulted in a statistically significant small reduction in time to first successful extubation; thus, the clinical importance of the effect size is uncertain. FUTURE WORK Future work should explore intervention sustainability and effects of the intervention in other paediatric populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered as ISRCTN16998143. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 18. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Kevin P Morris
- Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Joanne Jordan
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Lisa McIlmurray
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Ashley Agus
- Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Roisin Boyle
- Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Mike Clarke
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Christina Easter
- Institute of Applied Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Richard G Feltbower
- School of Medicine, Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Karla Hemming
- Institute of Applied Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Duncan Macrae
- Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Clíona McDowell
- Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Margaret Murray
- Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Roger Parslow
- School of Medicine, Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Mark J Peters
- Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - Glenn Phair
- Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Lyvonne N Tume
- School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - Timothy S Walsh
- Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Daniel F McAuley
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Silversides JA, McMullan R, Emerson LM, Bradbury I, Bannard-Smith J, Szakmany T, Trinder J, Rostron AJ, Johnston P, Ferguson AJ, Boyle AJ, Blackwood B, Marshall JC, McAuley DF. Feasibility of conservative fluid administration and deresuscitation compared with usual care in critical illness: the Role of Active Deresuscitation After Resuscitation-2 (RADAR-2) randomised clinical trial. Intensive Care Med 2022; 48:190-200. [PMID: 34913089 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-021-06596-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Fluid overload is common in critical illness and is associated with mortality. This study investigated the feasibility of a randomised trial comparing conservative fluid administration and deresuscitation (active removal of accumulated fluid using diuretics or ultrafiltration) with usual care in critical illness. METHODS Open-label, parallel-group, allocation-concealed randomised clinical feasibility trial. Mechanically ventilated adult patients expected to require critical care beyond the next calendar day were enrolled between 24 and 48 h following admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Patients were randomised to either a 2-stage fluid strategy comprising conservative fluid administration and, if fluid overload was present, active deresuscitation, or usual care. The primary endpoint was fluid balance in the 24 h up to the start of study day 3. Secondary endpoints included cumulative fluid balance, mortality, and duration of mechanical ventilation. RESULTS One hundred and eighty patients were randomised. After withdrawal of 1 patient, 89 patients assigned to the intervention were compared with 90 patients assigned to the usual care group. The mean plus standard deviation (SD) 24-h fluid balance up to study day 3 was lower in the intervention group (- 840 ± 1746 mL) than the usual care group (+ 130 ± 1401 mL; P < 0.01). Cumulative fluid balance was lower in the intervention group at days 3 and 5. Overall, clinical outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups, although the point estimate for 30-day mortality favoured the usual care group [intervention arm: 19 of 90 (21.6%) versus usual care: 14 of 89 (15.6%), P = 0.32]. Baseline imbalances between groups and lack of statistical power limit interpretation of clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS A strategy of conservative fluid administration and active deresuscitation is feasible, reduces fluid balance compared with usual care, and may cause benefit or harm. In view of wide variations in contemporary clinical practice, large, adequately powered trials investigating the clinical effectiveness of conservative fluid strategies in critically ill patients are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan A Silversides
- Department of Critical Care, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University of Belfast, Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK.
| | - Ross McMullan
- Department of Critical Care, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Lydia M Emerson
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Ian Bradbury
- Independent Consulting Statistician, Aviemore, UK
| | - Jonathan Bannard-Smith
- Department of Critical Care, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Tamas Szakmany
- Critical Care Directorate, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, UK
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - John Trinder
- Intensive Care Unit, South-Eastern Health and Social Care Trust, Dundonald, UK
| | - Anthony J Rostron
- Integrated Critical Care Unit, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Paul Johnston
- Intensive Care Unit, Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Antrim, UK
| | - Andrew J Ferguson
- Department of Critical Care, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Andrew J Boyle
- Department of Critical Care, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University of Belfast, Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK
- Intensive Care Unit, Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Antrim, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University of Belfast, Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK
| | - John C Marshall
- Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Daniel F McAuley
- Department of Critical Care, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University of Belfast, Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Charles K, Harnischfeger J, Erikson S, Burren J, Waak M, Blackwood B, Tume L, Long D, Anne Schults J. Bi-national survey of ventilation weaning and extubation practices in children. Aust Crit Care 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.08.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
36
|
Blackwood B, McAuley DF, Peters MJ. Sedation and Ventilator Liberation Protocol vs Usual Care and Duration of Invasive Ventilation in Pediatric Intensive Care Units-Reply. JAMA 2021; 326:2329. [PMID: 34905035 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.17731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Daniel F McAuley
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Mark J Peters
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, England
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Johnston BW, Chean CS, Duarte R, Hill R, Blackwood B, McAuley DF, Welters ID. Management of new onset atrial fibrillation in critically unwell adult patients: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br J Anaesth 2021; 128:759-771. [PMID: 34916053 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND New onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is the most common arrhythmia affecting critically unwell patients. NOAF can lead to worsening haemodynamic compromise, heart failure, thromboembolic events, and increased mortality. The aim of this systematic review and narrative synthesis is to evaluate the non-pharmacological and pharmacological management strategies for NOAF in critically unwell patients. METHODS Of 1782 studies, 30 were eligible for inclusion, including 4 RCTs and 26 observational studies. Efficacy of direct current cardioversion, amiodarone, β-antagonists, calcium channel blockers, digoxin, magnesium, and less commonly used agents such as ibutilide are reported. RESULTS Cardioversion rates of 48% were reported for direct current cardioversion; however, re-initiation of NOAF was as high as 23.4%. Amiodarone was the most commonly reported intervention with cardioversion rates ranging from 18% to 95.8% followed by β-antagonists with cardioversion rates from 40% to 92.3%. Amiodarone was more effective than diltiazem (odds ratio [OR]=1.91, P=0.32) at cardioversion. Short-acting β-antagonists esmolol and landiolol were more effective compared with diltiazem at cardioversion (OR=3.55, P=0.04) and HR control (OR=3.2, P<0.001). CONCLUSION There was significant variation between studies with regard to the definition of successful cardioversion and heart rate control, making comparisons between studies and interventions difficult. Future RCTs comparing individual anti-arrhythmic agents, in particular magnesium, amiodarone, and β-antagonists, and the role of anticoagulation in critically unwell patients are required. There is also an urgent need for a core outcome dataset for studies of new onset atrial fibrillation to allow comparisons between different anti-arrhythmic strategies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019121739.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian W Johnston
- Institute for Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| | - Chung S Chean
- Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust, Northampton, UK
| | - Rui Duarte
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ruaraidh Hill
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Danny F McAuley
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Ingeborg D Welters
- Institute for Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Beecher C, Toomey E, Maeso B, Whiting C, Stewart DC, Worrall A, Elliott J, Smith M, Tierney T, Blackwood B, Maguire T, Kampman M, Ling B, Gravel C, Gill C, Healy P, Houghton C, Booth A, Garritty C, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Burke NN, Keenan C, Westmore M, Devane D. What are the most important unanswered research questions on rapid review methodology? A James Lind Alliance research methodology Priority Setting Partnership: the Priority III study protocol. HRB Open Res 2021; 4:80. [PMID: 34693206 PMCID: PMC8506222 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13321.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The value of rapid reviews in informing health care decisions is more evident since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. While systematic reviews can be completed rapidly, rapid reviews are usually a type of evidence synthesis in which components of the systematic review process may be simplified or omitted to produce information more efficiently within constraints of time, expertise, funding or any combination thereof. There is an absence of high-quality evidence underpinning some decisions about how we plan, do and share rapid reviews. We will conduct a modified James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership to determine the top 10 unanswered research questions about how we plan, do and share rapid reviews in collaboration with patients, public, reviewers, researchers, clinicians, policymakers and funders. Methods: An international steering group consisting of key stakeholder perspectives (patients, the public, reviewers, researchers, clinicians, policymakers and funders) will facilitate broad reach, recruitment and participation across stakeholder groups. An initial online survey will identify stakeholders' perceptions of research uncertainties about how we plan, do and share rapid reviews. Responses will be categorised to generate a long list of questions. The list will be checked against systematic reviews published within the past three years to identify if the question is unanswered. A second online stakeholder survey will rank the long list in order of priority. Finally, a virtual consensus workshop of key stakeholders will agree on the top 10 unanswered questions. Discussion: Research prioritisation is an important means for minimising research waste and ensuring that research resources are targeted towards answering the most important questions. Identifying the top 10 rapid review methodology research priorities will help target research to improve how we plan, do and share rapid reviews and ultimately enhance the use of high-quality synthesised evidence to inform health care policy and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Beecher
- Evidence Synthesis Ireland and Cochrane Ireland, Galway, Ireland.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Elaine Toomey
- School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Beccy Maeso
- James Lind Alliance, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Derek C Stewart
- Honorary Professor, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Andrew Worrall
- Public co-author, Evidence Synthesis Ireland, Galway, Ireland.,Public co-author, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Jim Elliott
- Public co-author, Evidence Synthesis Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Maureen Smith
- Public co-author, Cochrane Consumer Network Executive, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Theresa Tierney
- Patient Partner, HRB Primary Care Clinical Trials Network Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute of Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | | | | | - Christopher Gravel
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Patricia Healy
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Catherine Houghton
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health And Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - James Thomas
- EPPI-Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Andrea C Tricco
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Epidemiology Division and Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Queen's Collaboration for Health Care Quality JBI Centre of Excellence, School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nikita N Burke
- Evidence Synthesis Ireland and Cochrane Ireland, Galway, Ireland.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Ciara Keenan
- Campbell UK & Ireland, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | - Declan Devane
- Evidence Synthesis Ireland and Cochrane Ireland, Galway, Ireland.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.,Health Research Board- Trials Methodology Research Network, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Beecher C, Toomey E, Maeso B, Whiting C, Stewart DC, Worrall A, Elliott J, Smith M, Tierney T, Blackwood B, Maguire T, Kampman M, Ling B, Gravel C, Gill C, Healy P, Houghton C, Booth A, Garritty C, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Burke NN, Keenan C, Westmore M, Devane D. What are the most important unanswered research questions on rapid review methodology? A James Lind Alliance research methodology Priority Setting Partnership: the Priority III study protocol. HRB Open Res 2021; 4:80. [PMID: 34693206 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13321.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The value of rapid reviews in informing health care decisions is more evident since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. While systematic reviews can be completed rapidly, rapid reviews are usually a type of evidence synthesis in which components of the systematic review process may be simplified or omitted to produce information more efficiently within constraints of time, expertise, funding or any combination thereof. There is an absence of high-quality evidence underpinning some decisions about how we plan, do and share rapid reviews. We will conduct a modified James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership to determine the top 10 unanswered research questions about how we plan, do and share rapid reviews in collaboration with patients, public, reviewers, researchers, clinicians, policymakers and funders. Methods: An international steering group consisting of key stakeholder perspectives (patients, the public, reviewers, researchers, clinicians, policymakers and funders) will facilitate broad reach, recruitment and participation across stakeholder groups. An initial online survey will identify stakeholders' perceptions of research uncertainties about how we plan, do and share rapid reviews. Responses will be categorised to generate a long list of questions. The list will be checked against systematic reviews published within the past three years to identify if the question is unanswered. A second online stakeholder survey will rank the long list in order of priority. Finally, a virtual consensus workshop of key stakeholders will agree on the top 10 unanswered questions. Discussion: Research prioritisation is an important means for minimising research waste and ensuring that research resources are targeted towards answering the most important questions. Identifying the top 10 rapid review methodology research priorities will help target research to improve how we plan, do and share rapid reviews and ultimately enhance the use of high-quality synthesised evidence to inform health care policy and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Beecher
- Evidence Synthesis Ireland and Cochrane Ireland, Galway, Ireland.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Elaine Toomey
- School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Beccy Maeso
- James Lind Alliance, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Derek C Stewart
- Honorary Professor, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Andrew Worrall
- Public co-author, Evidence Synthesis Ireland, Galway, Ireland.,Public co-author, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Jim Elliott
- Public co-author, Evidence Synthesis Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Maureen Smith
- Public co-author, Cochrane Consumer Network Executive, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Theresa Tierney
- Patient Partner, HRB Primary Care Clinical Trials Network Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute of Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | | | | | - Christopher Gravel
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Patricia Healy
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Catherine Houghton
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health And Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - James Thomas
- EPPI-Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Andrea C Tricco
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Epidemiology Division and Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Queen's Collaboration for Health Care Quality JBI Centre of Excellence, School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nikita N Burke
- Evidence Synthesis Ireland and Cochrane Ireland, Galway, Ireland.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Ciara Keenan
- Campbell UK & Ireland, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | - Declan Devane
- Evidence Synthesis Ireland and Cochrane Ireland, Galway, Ireland.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.,Health Research Board- Trials Methodology Research Network, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Winning L, Lundy FT, Blackwood B, McAuley DF, El Karim I. Oral health care for the critically ill: a narrative review. Crit Care 2021; 25:353. [PMID: 34598718 PMCID: PMC8485109 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03765-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background The link between oral bacteria and respiratory infections is well documented. Dental plaque has the potential to be colonized by respiratory pathogens and this, together with microaspiration of oral bacteria, can lead to pneumonia particularly in the elderly and critically ill. The provision of adequate oral care is therefore essential for the maintenance of good oral health and the prevention of respiratory complications. Main body Numerous oral
care practices are utilised for intubated patients, with a clear lack of consensus on the best approach for oral care. This narrative review aims to explore the oral-lung connection and discuss in detail current oral care practices to identify shortcomings and offer suggestions for future research. The importance of adequate oral care has been recognised in guideline interventions for the prevention of pneumonia, but practices differ and controversy exists particularly regarding the use of chlorhexidine. The oral health assessment is also an important but often overlooked element of oral care that needs to be considered. Oral care plans should ideally be implemented on the basis of an individual oral health assessment. An oral health assessment prior to provision of oral care should identify patient needs and facilitate targeted oral care interventions. Conclusion Oral health is an important consideration in the management of the critically ill. Studies have suggested benefit in the reduction of respiratory complication such as Ventilator Associated Pneumonia associated with effective oral health care practices. However, at present there is no consensus as to the best way of providing optimal oral health care in the critically ill. Further research is needed to standardise oral health assessment and care practices to enable development of evidenced based personalised oral care for the critically ill.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lewis Winning
- Dublin Dental University Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Fionnuala T Lundy
- Centre for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, The Wellcome-Wolfson Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Centre for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, The Wellcome-Wolfson Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Daniel F McAuley
- Centre for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, The Wellcome-Wolfson Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Ikhlas El Karim
- Centre for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, The Wellcome-Wolfson Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
O'Neill B, Linden M, Ramsay P, Darweish Medniuk A, Outtrim J, King J, Blackwood B. Development of the support needs after ICU (SNAC) questionnaire. Nurs Crit Care 2021; 27:410-418. [PMID: 34387920 PMCID: PMC9290803 DOI: 10.1111/nicc.12695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Aims To develop a questionnaire to identify Intensive Care survivor needs at key transitions during the recovery process, and assess its validity and reliability in a group of ICU survivors. Methods Development of the Support Needs After ICU (SNAC) questionnaire was based on a systematic scoping review, and analysis of patient interviews (n = 22). Face and content validity were assessed by service users (n = 12) and an expert panel of healthcare professionals (n = 6). A pilot survey among 200 ICU survivors assessed recruitment at one of five different stages after ICU discharge [(1) in hospital, (2) < 6 weeks, (3) 7 weeks to 6 months, (4) 7 to 12 months, or (5) 12 to 24 months post‐hospital discharge]; to assess reliability of the SNAC questionnaire; and to conduct exploratory data analysis. Reliability was determined using Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency; intraclass correlation coefficients for test–retest reliability. We explored correlations with sociodemographic variables using Pearson's correlation coefficient; differences between questionnaire scores and patient demographics using one‐way ANOVA. Results The SNAC questionnaire consisted of 32 items that assessed five categories of support needs (informational, emotional, instrumental [e.g. practical physical help, provision of equipment or training], appraisal [e.g. clinician feedback on recovery] and spiritual needs). ICU survivors were recruited from Northern Ireland, England and Scotland. From a total of 375 questionnaires distributed, 202 (54%) were returned. The questionnaire had high internal consistency (0.97) and high test–retest reliability (r = 0.8) with subcategories ranging from 0.3 to 0.9. Conclusions The SNAC questionnaire appears to be a comprehensive, valid, and reliable questionnaire. Further research will enable more robust examination of its properties e.g. factor analysis, and establish its utility in identifying whether patients' support needs evolve over time. Relevance to clinical practice The SNAC questionnaire has the potential to be used to identify ICU survivors' needs and inform post‐hospital support services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenda O'Neill
- Centre for Health and Rehabilitation Technologies, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Mark Linden
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Pam Ramsay
- School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | | | - Joanne Outtrim
- Division of Anaesthesia, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Judy King
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Blackwood B, Tume LN, Morris KP, Clarke M, McDowell C, Hemming K, Peters MJ, McIlmurray L, Jordan J, Agus A, Murray M, Parslow R, Walsh TS, Macrae D, Easter C, Feltbower RG, McAuley DF. Effect of a Sedation and Ventilator Liberation Protocol vs Usual Care on Duration of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Pediatric Intensive Care Units: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2021; 326:401-410. [PMID: 34342620 PMCID: PMC8335576 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.10296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE There is limited evidence on the optimal strategy for liberating infants and children from invasive mechanical ventilation in the pediatric intensive care unit. OBJECTIVE To determine if a sedation and ventilator liberation protocol intervention reduces the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation in infants and children anticipated to require prolonged mechanical ventilation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A pragmatic multicenter, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted that included 17 hospital sites (18 pediatric intensive care units) in the UK sequentially randomized from usual care to the protocol intervention. From February 2018 to October 2019, 8843 critically ill infants and children anticipated to require prolonged mechanical ventilation were recruited. The last date of follow-up was November 11, 2019. INTERVENTIONS Pediatric intensive care units provided usual care (n = 4155 infants and children) or a sedation and ventilator liberation protocol intervention (n = 4688 infants and children) that consisted of assessment of sedation level, daily screening for readiness to undertake a spontaneous breathing trial, a spontaneous breathing trial to test ventilator liberation potential, and daily rounds to review sedation and readiness screening and set patient-relevant targets. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation from initiation of ventilation until the first successful extubation. The primary estimate of the treatment effect was a hazard ratio (with a 95% CI) adjusted for calendar time and cluster (hospital site) for infants and children anticipated to require prolonged mechanical ventilation. RESULTS There were a total of 8843 infants and children (median age, 8 months [interquartile range, 1 to 46 months]; 42% were female) who completed the trial. There was a significantly shorter median time to successful extubation for the protocol intervention compared with usual care (64.8 hours vs 66.2 hours, respectively; adjusted median difference, -6.1 hours [interquartile range, -8.2 to -5.3 hours]; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.20], P = .02). The serious adverse event of hypoxia occurred in 9 (0.2%) infants and children for the protocol intervention vs 11 (0.3%) for usual care; nonvascular device dislodgement occurred in 2 (0.04%) vs 7 (0.1%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among infants and children anticipated to require prolonged mechanical ventilation, a sedation and ventilator liberation protocol intervention compared with usual care resulted in a statistically significant reduction in time to first successful extubation. However, the clinical importance of the effect size is uncertain. TRIAL REGISTRATION isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN16998143.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Ireland
| | - Lyvonne N. Tume
- School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Manchester, England
- Alder Hey Children’s NHS Trust, Liverpool, England
| | - Kevin P. Morris
- Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, England
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England
| | - Mike Clarke
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Ireland
| | - Clíona McDowell
- Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Hospitals, Belfast, Ireland
| | | | - Mark J. Peters
- Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, England
- University College London, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, London, England
| | - Lisa McIlmurray
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Ireland
| | - Joanne Jordan
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Ireland
| | - Ashley Agus
- Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Hospitals, Belfast, Ireland
| | - Margaret Murray
- Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Hospitals, Belfast, Ireland
| | - Roger Parslow
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, England
| | - Timothy S. Walsh
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | | | | | - Richard G. Feltbower
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, England
| | - Daniel F. McAuley
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rose L, Burry L, Agar M, Blackwood B, Campbell NL, Clarke M, Devlin JW, Lee J, Marshall JC, Needham DM, Siddiqi N, Page V. A core outcome set for studies evaluating interventions to prevent and/or treat delirium for adults requiring an acute care hospital admission: an international key stakeholder informed consensus study. BMC Med 2021; 19:143. [PMID: 34140006 PMCID: PMC8211534 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02015-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trials of interventions to prevent or treat delirium in adults in an acute hospital setting report heterogeneous outcomes. Our objective was to develop international consensus among key stakeholders for a core outcome set (COS) for future trials of interventions to prevent and/or treat delirium in adults with an acute care hospital admission and not admitted to an intensive care unit. METHODS A rigorous COS development process was used including a systematic review, qualitative interviews, modified Delphi consensus process, and in-person consensus using nominal group technique (registration http://www.comet - initiative.org/studies/details/796 ). Participants in qualitative interviews were delirium survivors or family members. Participants in consensus methods comprised international representatives from three stakeholder groups: researchers, clinicians, and delirium survivors and family members. RESULTS Item generation identified 8 delirium-specific outcomes and 71 other outcomes from 183 studies, and 30 outcomes from 18 qualitative interviews, including 2 that were not extracted from the systematic review. De-duplication of outcomes and formal consensus processes involving 110 experts including researchers (N = 32), clinicians (N = 63), and delirium survivors and family members (N = 15) resulted in a COS comprising 6 outcomes: delirium occurrence and reoccurrence, delirium severity, delirium duration, cognition, emotional distress, and health-related quality of life. Study limitations included exclusion of non-English studies and stakeholders and small representation of delirium survivors/family at the in-person consensus meeting. CONCLUSIONS This COS, endorsed by the American and Australian Delirium Societies and European Delirium Association, is recommended for future clinical trials evaluating delirium prevention or treatment interventions in adults presenting to an acute care hospital and not admitted to an intensive care unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Rose
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, Rm 1.13, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Rd, London, SE1 8WA, UK.
| | - Lisa Burry
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Meera Agar
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute of Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Noll L Campbell
- College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Mike Clarke
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - John W Devlin
- School of Pharmacy, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jacques Lee
- Inaugural Research Chair in Geriatric Emergency Medicine, Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John C Marshall
- St Michael's Hospital and Li Ka Shing Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Dale M Needham
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Background: Acute type two respiratory failure (AT2RF) is characterized by high carbon dioxide levels (PaCO 2 >6kPa). Non-invasive ventilation (NIV), the current standard of care, has a high failure rate. High flow nasal therapy (HFNT) has potential additional benefits such as CO 2 clearance, the ability to communicate and comfort. The primary aim of this systematic review is to determine whether HFNT in AT2RF improves 1) PaCO 2, 2) clinical and patient-centred outcomes and 3) to assess potential harms. Methods: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL (January 1999-January 2021). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing HFNT with low flow nasal oxygen (LFO) or NIV were included. Two authors independently assessed studies for eligibility, data extraction and risk of bias. We used Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs and Ottawa-Newcastle scale for cohort studies. Results: From 727 publications reviewed, four RCTs and one cohort study (n=425) were included. In three trials of HFNT vs NIV, comparing PaCO 2 (kPa) at last follow-up time point, there was a significant reduction at four hours (1 RCT; HFNT median 6.7, IQR 5.6 - 7.7 vs NIV median 7.6, IQR 6.3 - 9.3) and no significant difference at 24-hours or five days. Comparing HFNT with LFO, there was no significant difference at 30-minutes. There was no difference in intubation or mortality. Conclusions: This review identified a small number of studies with low to very low certainty of evidence. A reduction of PaCO 2 at an early time point of four hours post-intervention was demonstrated in one small RCT. Significant limitations of the included studies were lack of adequately powered outcomes and clinically relevant time-points and small sample size. Accordingly, systematic review cannot recommend the use of HFNT as the initial management strategy for AT2RF and trials adequately powered to detect clinical and patient-relevant outcomes are urgently warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asem Abdulaziz Alnajada
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute For Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute For Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Abdulmajeed Mobrad
- Prince Sultan college for emergency medical services, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Adeel Akhtar
- Emergency department, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Ivan Pavlov
- Emergency department, Hôpital de Verdun, Montréal, Canada
| | - Murali Shyamsundar
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute For Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Alnajada AA, Blackwood B, Mobrad A, Akhtar A, Pavlov I, Shyamsundar M. High flow nasal oxygen for acute type two respiratory failure: a systematic review. F1000Res 2021; 10:482. [PMID: 34621510 PMCID: PMC8453312.2 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.52885.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Acute type two respiratory failure (AT2RF) is characterized by high carbon dioxide levels (PaCO 2 >6kPa). Non-invasive ventilation (NIV), the current standard of care, has a high failure rate. High flow nasal therapy (HFNT) has potential additional benefits such as CO 2 clearance, the ability to communicate and comfort. The primary aim of this systematic review is to determine whether HFNT in AT2RF improves 1) PaCO 2, 2) clinical and patient-centred outcomes and 3) to assess potential harms. Methods: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL (January 1999-January 2021). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing HFNT with low flow nasal oxygen (LFO) or NIV were included. Two authors independently assessed studies for eligibility, data extraction and risk of bias. We used Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs and Ottawa-Newcastle scale for cohort studies. Results: From 727 publications reviewed, four RCTs and one cohort study (n=425) were included. In three trials of HFNT vs NIV, comparing PaCO 2 (kPa) at last follow-up time point, there was a significant reduction at four hours (1 RCT; HFNT median 6.7, IQR 5.6 - 7.7 vs NIV median 7.6, IQR 6.3 - 9.3) and no significant difference at 24-hours or five days. Comparing HFNT with LFO, there was no significant difference at 30-minutes. There was no difference in intubation or mortality. Conclusions: This review identified a small number of studies with low to very low certainty of evidence. A reduction of PaCO 2 at an early time point of four hours post-intervention was demonstrated in one small RCT. Significant limitations of the included studies were lack of adequately powered outcomes and clinically relevant time-points and small sample size. Accordingly, systematic review cannot recommend the use of HFNT as the initial management strategy for AT2RF and trials adequately powered to detect clinical and patient-relevant outcomes are urgently warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asem Abdulaziz Alnajada
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute For Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute For Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Abdulmajeed Mobrad
- Prince Sultan college for emergency medical services, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Adeel Akhtar
- Emergency department, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Ivan Pavlov
- Emergency department, Hôpital de Verdun, Montréal, Canada
| | - Murali Shyamsundar
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute For Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rose L, Burry L, Blackwood B. Core outcome sets in intensive care–what are they and why do we need them? An example for delirium. Nurs Crit Care 2021; 26:144-146. [DOI: 10.1111/nicc.12627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Rose
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care King's College London London UK
| | - Lisa Burry
- Department of Pharmacy & Medicine, Sinai Health System, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy University of Toronto Toronto Canada
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome‐Wolfson Institute for Experimental Research Faculty of Medicine Health and Life Sciences, Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Aitken LM, Kydonaki K, Blackwood B, Trahair LG, Purssell E, Sekhon M, Walsh TS. Inconsistent relationship between depth of sedation and intensive care outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax 2021; 76:1089-1098. [PMID: 33859048 DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-216098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the effect of depth of sedation on intensive care mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, and other clinically important outcomes. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO from 2000 to 2020. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that examined the effect of sedation depth were included. Two reviewers independently screened, selected articles, extracted data and appraised quality. Data on study design, population, setting, patient characteristics, study interventions, depth of sedation and relevant outcomes were extracted. Quality was assessed using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tools. RESULTS We included data from 26 studies (n=7865 patients): 8 RCTs and 18 cohort studies. Heterogeneity of studies was substantial. There was no significant effect of lighter sedation on intensive care mortality. Lighter sedation did not affect duration of mechanical ventilation in RCTs (mean difference (MD): -1.44 days (95% CI -3.79 to 0.91)) but did in cohort studies (MD: -1.52 days (95% CI -2.71 to -0.34)). No statistically significant benefit of lighter sedation was identified in RCTs. In cohort studies, lighter sedation improved time to extubation, intensive care and hospital length of stay and ventilator-associated pneumonia. We found no significant effects for hospital mortality, delirium or adverse events. CONCLUSION Evidence of benefit from lighter sedation is limited, with inconsistency between observational and randomised studies. Positive effects were mainly limited to low quality evidence from observational studies, which could be attributable to bias and confounding factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leanne M Aitken
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Kalliopi Kydonaki
- School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast Faculty of Medicine Health and Life Sciences, Belfast, UK
| | - Laurence G Trahair
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Edward Purssell
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Mandeep Sekhon
- School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Timothy S Walsh
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine and Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Labeau SO, Afonso E, Benbenishty J, Blackwood B, Boulanger C, Brett SJ, Calvino-Gunther S, Chaboyer W, Coyer F, Deschepper M, François G, Honore PM, Jankovic R, Khanna AK, Llaurado-Serra M, Lin F, Rose L, Rubulotta F, Saager L, Williams G, Blot SI. Correction to: Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study. Intensive Care Med 2021; 47:503-520. [PMID: 33635356 PMCID: PMC8035092 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06327-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia O Labeau
- Nursing Department, Faculty of Education, Health and Social Work, HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Elsa Afonso
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.,Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Rosie Maternity, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Carole Boulanger
- Intensive Care Department, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Stephen J Brett
- Section of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Wendy Chaboyer
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Fiona Coyer
- School of Nursing, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland University of Technology and Intensive Care Services (ICS), Herston, Australia.,Institute for Skin Integrity and Infection Prevention, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
| | - Mieke Deschepper
- Strategic Policy Cell, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Guy François
- Division of Scientific Affairs-Research, European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Patrick M Honore
- Intensive Care Department, CHU Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Radmilo Jankovic
- Department for Anesthesia and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, University of Nis, Niš, Serbia
| | - Ashish K Khanna
- Section on Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Illness, Injury Recovery and Research Center, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.,Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Frances Lin
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Louise Rose
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.,Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.,Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing and Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Prolonged-Ventilation Weaning Centre, Michael Garron Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Francesca Rubulotta
- Section of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Leif Saager
- Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Universitaetsmedizin Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany.,Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Ged Williams
- Al Mafraq Hospital, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Stijn I Blot
- Nursing Department, Faculty of Education, Health and Social Work, HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Ghent, Belgium. .,Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Labeau SO, Afonso E, Benbenishty J, Blackwood B, Boulanger C, Brett SJ, Calvino-Gunther S, Chaboyer W, Coyer F, Deschepper M, François G, Honore PM, Jankovic R, Khanna AK, Llaurado-Serra M, Lin F, Rose L, Rubulotta F, Saager L, Williams G, Blot SI. Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study. Intensive Care Med 2021; 47:160-169. [PMID: 33034686 PMCID: PMC7880913 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06234-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. METHODS International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. RESULTS Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9-27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6-16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score < 19, ICU stay > 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2-1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4-1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3-3.3). CONCLUSION Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia O Labeau
- Nursing Department, Faculty of Education, Health and Social Work, HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Elsa Afonso
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Rosie Maternity, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Carole Boulanger
- Intensive Care Department, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Stephen J Brett
- Section of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Wendy Chaboyer
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Fiona Coyer
- School of Nursing, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland University of Technology and Intensive Care Services (ICS), Herston, Australia
- Institute for Skin Integrity and Infection Prevention, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
| | - Mieke Deschepper
- Strategic Policy Cell, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Guy François
- Division of Scientific Affairs-Research, European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Patrick M Honore
- Intensive Care Department, CHU Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Radmilo Jankovic
- Department for Anesthesia and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, University of Nis, Niš, Serbia
| | - Ashish K Khanna
- Section on Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Illness, Injury Recovery and Research Center, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Frances Lin
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Louise Rose
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing and Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Prolonged-Ventilation Weaning Centre, Michael Garron Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Francesca Rubulotta
- Section of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Leif Saager
- Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Universitaetsmedizin Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Ged Williams
- Al Mafraq Hospital, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Stijn I Blot
- Nursing Department, Faculty of Education, Health and Social Work, HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Ghent, Belgium.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Verbeek JH, Rajamaki B, Ijaz S, Sauni R, Toomey E, Blackwood B, Tikka C, Ruotsalainen JH, Kilinc Balci FS. Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff. Emergencias 2021; 33:59-61. [PMID: 33496400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jos H Verbeek
- Cochrane Work Review Group, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Países Bajos
| | - Blair Rajamaki
- School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finlandia
| | - Sharea Ijaz
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, Reino Unido
| | - Riitta Sauni
- University of Tampere, Tampere, Finlandia. 5Galway, Irlanda
| | | | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Centre for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Reino Unido
| | - Christina Tikka
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, TYÖTERVEYSLAITOS, Finlandia
| | - Jani H Ruotsalainen
- Assessment of Pharmacotherapies, Finnish Medicines Agency, Kuopio, Finlandia
| | - F Selcen Kilinc Balci
- National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory (NPPTL), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Pittsburgh, PA, Estados Unidos
| |
Collapse
|