Decision-making capacity and surrogate designation in French ICU patients

ICU Admission Preferences in the Hypothetical Event of Acute Critical Illness: A Survey of Very Old Norwegians and Their Next-of-Kins

OBJECTIVES

To explore older patients' ICU admission preferences and their next-of-kins' ability to predict these preferences.

DESIGN

Self-administered survey.

SETTING

Three outpatient clinics, urban tertiary teaching hospital, Norway.

PATIENTS

Purposive sample of outpatients 80 years old or older regarded as potential ICU candidates and their next-of-kins.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We asked about the patients' ICU admission preferences in three hypothetical scenarios of acute critical illness. Next-of-kin respondents were asked to make a proxy statement regarding the older respondents' wishes regarding ICU admission. For each treatment choice, all respondents could provide their level of confidence. Additionally, we sought to identify demographic and healthcare-related characteristics that potentially influenced ICU admission preferences and proxy accuracy. Of 202 outpatients 80 years old or older, equal proportions opted for (39%; CI, 33-45%) and against (40%; CI, 34-46%) ICU admission, and one in five (21%; CI, 17-26%) did not wish to engage decision-making. Male gender, religiosity, and prior ICU experience increased the likelihood of older respondents opting for ICU admission. Although next-of-kins' proxy statements only weakly agreed with the older respondents' true ICU admission preferences (52%; CI, 45-59%), they agreed with the next-of-kins' own ICU admission preferences (79%; CI, 73-84%) to a significantly higher degree. Decisional confidence was high for both the older and the next-of-kin respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

In this purposive sample of Norwegian potential ICU candidates 80 years old or older, we found substantial variation in the ICU admission preferences of very old patients. The next-of-kins' proxy statements did not align with the ICU admission preferences of the older respondents in half of the pairs, but next-of-kins' and older respondents' confidence levels in rendering these judgments were high.

Increasing healthcare proxy documentation in an intensive care unit: a quality improvement initiative

In New York State, the Health Care Proxy Law allows patients to designate a person they trust to make medical decisions on their behalf should they lose the capacity to do so. In an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting, identification of a health care proxy (HCP) is especially important as patients are at heightened risk of losing decision-making capacity during their clinical course. While our hospital has guidelines to solicit and correctly document the patient's HCP information, it is not routinely done. Missing or incomplete HCP documentation is a prevalent issue, with lack of patient education, physical document issues, and time and workflow constraints commonly cited as barriers. We describe the implementation of a small-scale quality improvement project to increase the percentage of completed HCP documentation in our ICU through multi-faceted interventions targeting education, workflow, access, and technology.

Patients' experiences of preparing for transfer from the intensive care unit to a hospital ward: A multicentre qualitative study

BACKGROUND

The transfer from an intensive care unit (ICU) to a regular ward often causes confusion and stress for patients and family members. However, little is known about the patients' perspective on preparing for the transfer.

AIM

The purpose of the study was to describe patients' experiences of preparing for transfer from an ICU to a ward.

STUDY DESIGN

Individual interviews with 14 former ICU patients from three urban hospitals in Stockholm, Sweden were conducted 3 months after hospital discharge. Qualitative content analysis was used to interpret the interview transcripts. Reporting followed the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research checklist.

RESULTS

The results showed that the three categories, the discharge decision, patient involvement, and practical preparations were central to the patients' experiences of preparing for the transition from the intensive care unit to the ward. The discharge decision was associated with a sense of relief, but also worry about what would happen on the ward. The patients felt that they were not involved in the decision about the discharge or the planning of their health care. To handle the situation, patients needed information about planned care and treatment. However, the information was often sparse, delivered from a clinician's perspective, and therefore not much help in preparing for transfer.

CONCLUSIONS

ICU patients experienced that they were neither involved in the process of forthcoming care nor adequately prepared for the transfer to the ward. Relevant and comprehensible information and sufficient time to prepare were needed to reduce stress and promote efficient recovery.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The study suggests that current transfer strategies are not optimal, and a more person-centred discharge procedure would be beneficial to support patients and family members in the transition from the ICU to the ward.

Escalation to intensive care for the older patient. An exploratory qualitative study of patients aged 65 years and older and their next of kin during the COVID-19 pandemic: the ESCALATE study

BACKGROUND

older people comprise the majority of hospital medical inpatients so decision-making regarding admission of this cohort to the intensive care unit (ICU) is important. ICU can be perceived by clinicians as overly burdensome for patients and loved ones, and long-term impact on quality of life considered unacceptable, effecting potential bias against admitting older people to ICU. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the challenge of selecting those who could most benefit from ICU.

OBJECTIVE

this qualitative study aimed to explore the views and recollections of escalation to ICU from older patients (aged ≥ 65 years) and next of kin (NoK) who experienced a COVID-19 ICU admission.

SETTING

the main site was a large NHS Trust in London, which experienced a high burden of COVID-19 cases.

SUBJECTS

30 participants, comprising 12 patients, 7 NoK of survivor and 11 NoK of deceased.

METHODS

semi-structured interviews with thematic analysis using a framework approach.

RESULTS

there were five major themes: inevitability, disconnect, acceptance, implications for future decision-making and unique impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Life was highly valued and ICU perceived to be the only option. Prior understanding of ICU and admission decision-making explanations were limited. Despite benefit of hindsight, having experienced an ICU admission and its consequences, most could not conceptualise thresholds for future acceptable treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

in this study of patients ≥65 years and their NoK experiencing an acute ICU admission, survival was prioritised. Despite the ordeal of an ICU stay and its aftermath, the decision to admit and sequelae were considered acceptable.

Criteria deemed important by ICU patients when designating a reference person

Background

We investigated the criteria that hospitalized patients in intensive care units (ICUs) deem important when designating relatives who are best qualified to interact with the caregiving staff.

Methods

We conducted an exploratory, observational, prospective, multicenter study between March 1, 2018, and October 31, 2018, within two ICUs. A 12-item questionnaire was distributed to patients in the ICUs by the investigating physicians. Patients were considered eligible if they had a good understanding of the French language and if they had not officially designated surrogates before ICU admission.

Results

Seventy-one patients whose average age was 63.9± 17.3 years, of whom 21 (29.5%) were females, completed the questionnaire. The average Charlson comorbidity score was 2.5 ± 2.4, and the average Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) was 39.8 ± 16.5. The main etiology was respiratory infection (40.8%), followed by sepsis (23.9%). The most important criteria identified by patients when selecting reference persons were a good knowledge of the patient's wishes and values, an emotional attachment to the patient, and being a family member.

Conclusion

Our findings reveal that ICU patients considered the following criteria to be critical when designating reference persons: knowledge of their wishes and the existence of emotional and family attachments.

Activities of daily living and psychiatric symptoms after intensive care unit discharge among critically ill patients with or without tracheostomy: a single center longitudinal study

Aim

Tracheostomy is widely performed in critically ill patients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. Long-term morbidity (post-intensive care syndrome) in tracheostomized patients is not widely reported, however, so we evaluate it here.

Methods

This is a sub-analysis of a single center prospective longitudinal study, which assessed activities of daily living (ADL) and psychiatric symptoms in adult patients emergently admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). We evaluated association between these symptoms and tracheostomy by posting questionnaires at 3 and 12 months after ICU discharge.

Results

We analyzed 107 patients (15 patients with tracheostomy) at 3 months and 74 patients (13 patients with tracheostomy) at 12 months after ICU discharge. ADL tended to be lower in patients with tracheostomy than in those without tracheostomy at 3 months after ICU discharge (65 [10-100] versus 95 [59-100]; P = 0.28, 7/15 [47%] versus 30/102 [30%] Barthel Index scored ≤ 60; P = 0.23), however there were no significant differences. Psychiatric symptoms were not different between the groups at 3 months and again at 12 months.

Conclusion

Activities of daily living disability and psychiatric symptoms were not significantly worse in patients with tracheostomy at 3 and 12 months from ICU discharge compared with patients without tracheostomy. Despite the limited number in our cohort, our study may inform shared decision making concerning tracheostomy for critically ill patients and their families.

Values and self-perception of behaviour among critical care nurses

BACKGROUND

Moral distress has various adverse effects on nurses working in critical care. Differences in personal values, and between values and self-perception of behaviour are factors that may cause moral distress.

RESEARCH AIMS

The aims of this study were (1) to identify ethical values and self-perception of behaviour of critical care nurses in Japan and (2) to determine the items with a large difference between value and behaviour and the items with a large difference in value from others.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A nationwide, cross-sectional study was conducted.

PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT

We developed a self-administered questionnaire with 28 items, which was completed by 1014 critical care nurses in Japan. The difference between value and self-perception of behaviour was calculated from the score of each value item minus the score of each self-perception of behaviour item. The size of the difference in value from the others was judged by the standard deviation of each item.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Tokyo Medical and Dental University (approval nos. M2018-214, M2019-045).

RESULTS

The items with a large difference between value and behaviour sources were related to the working environment and decision-making support. The items with a large difference in value from others were related to hospital management and disclosure of information to patients.

DISCUSSION

Improving the working environment for nurses is important for reducing moral distress. Nurses are faced with a variety of choices, including advocating for patients and protecting the fair distribution of medical resources, and each nurse's priorities might diverge from those of other team members, which can lead to conflict within the team.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed items with particularly high risks of moral distress for nurses. The results provide foundational information that can guide the development of strategies to mitigate moral distress.

Criteria deemed important by the relatives for designating a reference person for patients hospitalized in ICU

PURPOSE

We investigated the criteria that patients' relatives deem important for choosing, among themselves, the person best qualified to interact with the caregiving staff.

METHODS

Exploratory, observational, prospective, multicentre study between 1st March and 31st October 2018 in 2 intensive care units (ICUs). A 12-item questionnaire was completed anonymously by family members of patients hospitalized in the ICU 3 and 5 days after the patient's admission. Relatives were eligible if they understood French and if no surrogate had been appointed by the patient prior to ICU admission. More than one relative per patient could participate.

RESULTS

In total, 87 relatives of 73 patients completed the questionnaire, average age of relatives was 58 ± 15 years, 46% were the spouse, 30% were children/grandchildren. Items classed as being the most important attributes for a reference person were: good knowledge of the patient's wishes and values; an emotional attachment to the patient; being a family member; and having an adequate understanding of the clinical status and clinical history.

CONCLUSION

This study identifies the attributes considered by relatives to be most important for designating, among themselves, a reference person for a patient hospitalized in the ICU.

Disagreement Between Clinicians and Score in Decision-Making Capacity of Critically Ill Patients

OBJECTIVES

To compare the assessment of decision-making capacity of ICU patients by attending clinicians (physicians, nurses, and residents) with a capacity score measured by the Mini-Mental Status Examination, completed by Aid to Capacity Evaluation if necessary. The primary outcome was agreement between physicians' assessments and the score. Secondary outcomes were agreement between nurses' or residents' assessments and the score and identification of factors associated with disagreement.

DESIGN

A 1-day prevalence study.

SETTING

Nineteen ICUs in France.

SUBJECTS

All patients hospitalized in the ICU on the study day and the attending clinicians.

INTERVENTIONS

The decision-making capacity of patients was assessed by the attending clinicians and independently by an observer using the score.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 206 patients were assessed by 213 attending clinicians (57 physicians, 97 nurses, and 59 residents). Physicians designated more patients as having decision-making capacity (n = 92/206 [45%]) than score (n = 34/206 [17%]; absolute difference 28% [95% CI, 20-37%]; p = 0.001). There was a high disagreement between assessments of all clinicians and score (Kappa coefficient 0.39 [95% CI, 0.29-0.50] for physicians; 0.39 [95% CI, 0.27-0.52] for nurses; and 0.46 [95% CI, 0.35-0.58] for residents). The main factor associated with disagreement was a Glasgow Coma Scale score between 10 and 15 (odds ratio, 2.92 [1.18-7.19], p = 0.02 for physicians; 4.97 [1.50-16.45], p = 0.01 for nurses; and 3.39 [1.12-10.29], p = 0.03 for residents) without differentiating between the Glasgow Coma Scale scores from 10 to 15.

CONCLUSIONS

The decision-making capacity of ICU patients was largely overestimated by all attending clinicians as compared with a score. The main factor associated with disagreement was a Glasgow Coma Scale score between 10 and 15, suggesting that clinicians confused consciousness with decision-making capacity.

A Communications Bundle to Improve Satisfaction for Critically Ill Patients and Their Families: A Prospective, Cohort Pilot Study

CONTEXT

Communication skills training with simulated patients is used by many academic centers, but how to translate skills learned in simulated settings to improve communication in real encounters has not been described.

OBJECTIVES

We developed a communications bundle to facilitate skill transfer from simulation to real encounters and improve patient and/or family satisfaction with physician communication. We tested the feasibility of its use in our hospital's medical intensive care unit (MICU).

METHODS

This prospective cohort 2-week feasibility study included patients admitted to the MICU with APACHE IV predicted mortality >30% and/or single organ failure. The communications bundle included simulation communication training for MICU physicians, scheduling a family meeting within 72 hours of MICU admission, standardized pre- and post-meeting team huddles with the aid of a mobile app to set an agenda, choose a communication goal, and get feedback, and documentation of meeting in the electronic medical record. The intervention group receiving the communications bundle was located in a geographically separate unit than the control group receiving standard of care from MICU physicians who had not received training in the communications bundle. Patient satisfaction surveys were given within 48 hours of the family meeting and scores compared between the two groups. We also compared trainee self-perceived communication preparation.

RESULTS

The intervention group (N = 15) scored significantly higher on satisfaction than the control group (N = 16) (P = 0.018). Intervention group trainees reported improvement in self-perceived communication preparation.

CONCLUSION

Use of the communications bundle proved feasible in the MICU and suggests association with improved patient satisfaction and trainee self-perception of communication preparedness.

Advance directives and the family: French and American perspectives

Several studies have explored differences between North American and European doctor-patient relationships. They have focused primarily on differences in philosophical traditions and historic and socio-economic factors between these two regions that might lead to differences in behaviour, as well as divergent concepts in and justifications of medical practice. However, few empirical intercultural studies have been carried out to identify in practice these cultural differences. This lack of standard comparative empirical studies led us to compare differences between France and the USA regarding end-of-life decision making. We tested certain assertions put forward by bioethicists concerning the impact of culture on the acceptance of advance directives in such decisions. In particular, we compared North American and French intensive care professional's attitudes toward: 1) advance directives and 2) the role of the family in decisions to withhold or withdraw life-support.

Feasibility of a multiple-choice mini mental state examination for chronically critically ill patients

OBJECTIVES

Following treatment in an ICU, up to 70% of chronically critically ill patients present neurocognitive impairment that can have negative effects on their quality of life, daily activities, and return to work. The Mini Mental State Examination is a simple, widely used tool for neurocognitive assessment. Although of interest when evaluating ICU patients, the current version is restricted to patients who are able to speak. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a visual, multiple-choice Mini Mental State Examination for ICU patients who are unable to speak.

DESIGN

The multiple-choice Mini Mental State Examination and the standard Mini Mental State Examination were compared across three different speaking populations. The interrater and intrarater reliabilities of the multiple-choice Mini Mental State Examination were tested on both intubated and tracheostomized ICU patients.

SETTING

Mixed 36-bed ICU and neuropsychology department in a university hospital.

SUBJECTS

Twenty-six healthy volunteers, 20 neurological patients, 46 ICU patients able to speak, and 30 intubated or tracheostomized ICU patients.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Multiple-choice Mini Mental State Examination results correlated satisfactorily with standard Mini Mental State Examination results in all three speaking groups: healthy volunteers: intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.43 (95% CI, -0.18 to 0.62); neurology patients: 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.95); and ICU patients able to speak: 0.86 (95% CI, 0.70-0.92). The interrater and intrarater reliabilities were good (0.95 [0.87-0.98] and 0.94 [0.31-0.99], respectively). In all populations, a Bland-Altman analysis showed systematically higher scores using the multiple-choice Mini Mental State Examination.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of the multiple-choice Mini Mental State Examination to ICU patients was straightforward and produced exploitable results comparable to those of the standard Mini Mental State Examination. It should be of interest for the assessment and monitoring of the neurocognitive performance of chronically critically ill patients during and after their ICU stay. The multiple-choice Mini Mental State Examination tool's role in neurorehabilitation and its utility in monitoring neurocognitive functions in ICU should be assessed in future studies.

Satisfaction with care and decision making among parents/caregivers in the pediatric intensive care unit: a comparison between English-speaking whites and Latinos

PURPOSE

Because of previously documented health care disparities, we hypothesized that English-speaking Latino parents/caregivers would be less satisfied with care and decision making than English-speaking non-Latino white (NLW) parents/caregivers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An intensive care unit (ICU) family satisfaction survey, Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit Survey (pediatric, 24 question version), was completed by English-speaking parents/caregivers of children in a cardiothoracic ICU at a university-affiliated children's hospital in 2011. English-speaking NLW and Latino parents/caregivers of patients, younger than 18 years, admitted to the ICU were approached to participate on hospital day 3 or 4 if they were at the bedside for greater than or equal to 2 days. Analysis of variance, χ(2), and Student t tests were used. Cronbach αs were calculated.

RESULTS

Fifty parents/caregivers completed the survey in each group. Latino parents/caregivers were younger, more often mothers born outside the United States, more likely to have government insurance or no insurance, and had less education and income. There were no differences between the groups' mean overall satisfaction scores (92.6 ± 8.3 and 93.0 ± 7.1, respectively; P = .80). The Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit Survey (pediatric, 24 question version) showed high internal consistency reliability (α = .95 and .91 for NLW and Latino groups, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

No disparities in ICU satisfaction with care and decision making between English-speaking NLW and Latino parents/caregivers were found.

Involvement of ICU families in decisions: fine-tuning the partnership

Families of patients are not simple visitors to the ICU. They have just been separated from a loved one, often someone they live with, either abruptly or, in nearly half the cases, because a chronic condition has suddenly worsened. They must cope with a serious illness of a loved one, while having to adapt to the unfamiliar and intimidating ICU environment. In many cases, the outcome of the critical illness is uncertain, a situation that causes considerable distress to the relatives. As shown by our research group and others, families exhibit symptoms of anxiety (70%) and depression (35%) in the first few days after admission, as well as symptoms of stress (33%) and difficulty understanding the information delivered by the healthcare staff (50%). Furthermore, relatives of patients who die in the ICU are at risk for psychiatric syndromes such as generalized anxiety, panic attacks, depression, and posttraumatic stress syndrome. In this setting of psychological distress, families are asked to consider sharing in healthcare decisions about their loved one in the ICU. This article aims to foster the debate about the shared decision-making process. We have three objectives: to transcend the overly simplistic position that opposes paternalism and autonomy, to build a view founded only on an evaluation of actual practice and experience in the field, and to keep the focus squarely on the patient. Families want information and communication time from the staff. Nurses and physicians need to understand that families can share in decisions only if the entire ICU staff actively promotes family involvement and, of course, if the family wants to participate in all or part of the decision-making process.

Psychometric evaluation of a modified version of the family satisfaction in the ICU survey in parents/caregivers of critically ill children*

OBJECTIVES

The Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit 24 (FS-ICU 24) survey consists of two domains (overall care and medical decision-making) and was validated only for family members of adult patients in the ICU. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the internal consistency and construct validity of the FS-ICU 24 survey modified for parents/caregivers of pediatric patients (Pediatric Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit 24 [pFS-ICU 24]) by comparing it to McPherson's PICU satisfaction survey, in a similar racial/ethnic population as the original Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit validation studies (English-speaking Caucasian adults). We hypothesized that the pFS-ICU 24 would be psychometrically sound to assess satisfaction of parents/caregivers with critically ill children.

DESIGN

A prospective survey examination of the pFS-ICU 24 was performed (1/2011-12/2011). Participants completed the pFS-ICU 24 and McPherson's survey with the order of administration alternated with each consecutive participant to control for order effects (nonrandomized). Cronbach's alphas (α) were calculated to examine internal consistency reliability, and Pearson correlations were calculated to examine construct validity.

SETTING

University-affiliated, children's hospital, cardiothoracic ICU.

SUBJECTS

English-speaking Caucasian parents/caregivers of children less than 18 years old admitted to the ICU (on hospital day 3 or 4) were approached to participate if they were at the bedside for greater than or equal to 2 days.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Fifty parents/caregivers completed the surveys (mean age ± SD = 36.2±9.6 yr; 56% mothers). The α for the pFS-ICU 24 was 0.95 and 0.92 for McPherson's survey. Overall, responses for the pFS-ICU 24 and McPherson's survey were significantly correlated (r = 0.73; p < 0.01). The average overall pFS-ICU 24 satisfaction score was 92.6 ± 8.3. The average pFS-ICU 24 satisfaction with care domain and medical decision-making domain scores were 93.3 ± 8.8 and 91.2 ± 8.9, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The pFS-ICU 24 is a psychometrically sound measure of satisfaction with care and medical decision-making of parents/caregivers with children in the ICU.

[Advanced directives: nurses' and physicians' representations in 2012]

In cancer patients, decision-making process is crucial and patient's involvement is described as a central component. In 2005, a new tool appears to convey patient's opinion even if he is not able to communicate anymore: advanced directives (AD). Unfortunately, their documentation is marginal. The objective of this study was to investigate nurses' and physicians' representations towards AD. A questionnaire had been sent to hospitals, public health facilities and liberal practitioners during February 2012. We collected responses from 42/251 physicians (17 %) and 80/198 nurses (40 %). Sixty percent of participants reported that they were not familiar with the legislative framework for AD. For physicians, main barriers were patient cognitive impairment (P = 0.004) and lack of information on the clinical situation (P = 0.004). For nurses, difficulties were toward end of life and prognosis discussion (P = 0.002), clinical situation evolution since AD documentation (P = 0.008), time frame for AD application (P < 0.001) and the fact that final decision is made by physician alone (P = 0.015). AD should be part of a good medical practice and literature has highlighted the benefit of AD on patient's quality of life. End of life discussion therefore requires dedicated time and specific training for physicians and nurses to improve the rate of patients with AD.

[A review of bioethics in the Intensive Care Unit: The autonomy and role of relatives and legal representatives]

In recent decades we have witnessed a change in mentality in which patient autonomy has reached significant preponderance, with informed consent as the prime example. The approach in situations where the patient cannot make decisions varies from one country to another, affording greater or lesser importance to the wishes of the family when a surrogate has not been designated. Several studies show discrepancies between the decisions of patients and that the decisions which their surrogates have taken for them. We review concepts such as greatest benefit, evaluate the potential limitations of advance care directives, and consider different options when the action or treatment proposed by professionals comes into conflict with the ideas expressed by the patient's family or surrogates, and which has led to different legally sanctioned solutions in some regions.

Impact of an intensive communication strategy on end-of-life practices in the intensive care unit

PURPOSE

Since the 2005 French law on end of life and patients' rights, it is unclear whether practices have evolved. We investigated whether an intensive communication strategy based on this law would influence practices in terms of withholding and withdrawing treatment (WWT), and outcome of patients hospitalised in intensive care (ICU).

METHODS

This was a single-centre, two-period study performed before and after the 2005 law. Between these periods, an intensive strategy for communication was developed and implemented, comprising regular meetings and modalities for WWT. We examined medical records of all patients who died in the ICU or in hospital during both periods.

RESULTS

In total, out of 2,478 patients admitted in period 1, 678 (27%) died in the ICU and 823/2,940 (28%) in period 2. In period 1, among patients who died in the ICU, 45% died subsequent to a decision to WWT versus 85% in period 2 (p < 0.01). Among these, median time delay between ICU admission and initiation of decision-making process was significantly different (6-7 days in period 1 vs. 3-5 days in period 2, p < 0.05). Similarly, median time from admission to actual WWT decision was significantly shorter in period 2 (11-13 days in period 1 vs. 4-6 days in period 2, p < 0.05). Finally, median time from admission to death in the ICU subsequent to a decision to WWT was 13-15 days in period 1 versus 7-8 days in period 2, p < 0.05. Reasons for WWT were not significantly different between periods.

CONCLUSION

Intensive communication brings about quicker end-of-life decision-making in the ICU. The new law has the advantage of providing a legal framework.

ICU care associated with symptoms of depression and posttraumatic stress disorder among family members of patients who die in the ICU

BACKGROUND

Psychologic symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression are relatively common among family members of patients who die in the ICU. The patient-level risk factors for these family symptoms are not well understood but may help to target future interventions.

METHODS

We performed a cohort study of family members of patients who died in the ICU or within 30 h of ICU transfer. Outcomes included self-reported symptoms of PTSD and depression. Predictors included patient demographics and elements of palliative care.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-six patients had chart abstraction and family questionnaire data. Family members of older patients had lower scores for PTSD (P = .026). Family members that were present at the time of death (P = .021) and family members of patients with early family conferences (P = .012) reported higher symptoms of PTSD. When withdrawal of a ventilator was ordered, family members reported lower symptoms of depression (P = .033). There were no other patient characteristics or elements of palliative care associated with family symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Family members of younger patients and those for whom mechanical ventilation is not withdrawn are at increased risk of psychologic symptoms and may represent an important group for intervention. Increased PTSD symptoms among family members present at the time of death may reflect a closer relationship with the patient or more involvement with the patient's ICU care but also suggests that family should be offered the option of not being present.

Predictors of symptoms of posttraumatic stress and depression in family members after patient death in the ICU

BACKGROUND

Patients' deaths in the ICU have been associated with a high burden of psychologic symptoms in families. This study identifies characteristics associated with psychologic symptoms in family members.

METHODS

Families of patients dying in the ICU or within 30 h of ICU discharge in 11 hospitals previously participated in a randomized trial. In the current study, we assessed these families for symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression with follow-up surveys. Outcomes included validated measures of PTSD (PTSD Checklist) and depressive (Patient Health Questionnaire) symptoms. Predictors included family member mental-health history, involvement in decision making, and demographics.

RESULTS

Surveys were completed by 226 families. Response rate was 46% in the original randomized trial and 82% in this study. Prevalence (95% CI) of PTSD and depressive symptoms were 14.0% (9.7%-19.3%) and 18.4% (13.5%-24.1%), respectively. Family characteristics associated with increased symptoms included: female gender (PTSD, P = .020; depression, P = .005), knowing the patient for a shorter duration (PTSD, P = .003; depression, P = .040), and discordance between family members' preferences for decision making and their actual decision-making roles (PTSD, P = .005; depression, P = .049). Depressive symptoms were also associated with lower educational level (P = .002). Families with psychologic symptoms were more likely to report that access to a counselor (PTSD, P < .001; depression, P = .003) and information about spiritual services might have been helpful while the patient was in the ICU (PTSD, P = .024; depression, P = .029).

CONCLUSIONS

Families demonstrated a high prevalence of psychologic symptoms after a death in the ICU. Characteristics associated with symptoms may help target interventions to reduce these symptoms.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT00685893.

The moral organization of the professions: Bioethics in the United States and France

Bioethics is a relatively new endeavor, emerging as a discourse distinct from considerations of moral responsibility occurring within the professions of medicine and science. We use the 'de-centered comparative method' to examine how the emergence and development of bioethics varies across different social and cultural settings. In particular, we look at bioethical work in the United States and France, exploring these different manifestations of the movement toward external oversight of those working in medicine and the life sciences. The study of these varied processes of occupational development allows us to address two important issues. One is the way in which pathways of professionalisation are shaped by contingent cultural and historical factors. The other is the degree to which the increasing prominence of the bioethical occupation is the result of the professional desires of bioethicists and/or a concern for the public good.

Meeting physicians' responsibilities in providing end-of-life care

Despite many clinical examples of exemplary end-of-life care, a number of studies highlight significant shortcomings in the quality of end-of-life care that the majority of patients receive. In part, this stems from inconsistencies in training and supporting clinicians in delivering end-of-life care. This review describes the responsibilities of pulmonary and critical care physicians in providing end-of-life care to patients and their families. While many responsibilities are common to all physicians who care for patients with life-limiting illness, some issues are particularly relevant to pulmonary and critical care physicians. These issues include prognostication and decision making about goals of care, challenges and approaches to communicating with patients and their family, the role of interdisciplinary collaboration, principles and practice of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining measures, and cultural competency in end-of-life care.

Informed consent in the critically ill: a two-step approach incorporating delirium screening

OBJECTIVES

Sedation-agitation and delirium are common in critically ill patients and may be important barriers to informed consent. We describe a two-step process for informed consent and evaluate the natural history of patients' competency by repeated application of this process during their hospitalization.

DESIGN

Observational study.

SETTING

Nine intensive care units (ICUs) in three teaching hospitals in Baltimore, MD.

PATIENTS

One hundred fifty patients with acute lung injury.

INTERVENTIONS

Two-step process involving objective evaluation with Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) and Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) (step 1), followed by traditional assessment for competency (step 2) in those patients passing step 1.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

RASS and CAM-ICU assessments (during ICU stay, at consent and hospital discharge); cumulative proportion of patients providing consent at extubation and at ICU and hospital discharge. Of 150 patients, 86 (57%) survived and 77 (90% of survivors) provided consent. Patients were delirious/deeply sedated in 89% of daily assessments during mechanical ventilation. By extubation, 31 (44%) patients passed step 1 and 8 (11%) passed step 2 and were consented. By ICU and hospital discharge, these numbers were 50 (58%) and 18 (21%), and 81 (94%) and 67 (78%), respectively. The median (interquartile range) time to patient consent after acute lung injury diagnosis was 15 (9-28) days.

CONCLUSIONS

More than three fourths of critically ill patients are unable to provide informed consent throughout their ICU stay, even after extubation. Sedation-agitation and delirium are common barriers to consent. A two-step consent process, using validated instruments for sedation-agitation and delirium, provides a means of rapidly screening critically ill patients before a more detailed traditional assessment of competency is conducted.

Nurses' experiences of caring for families with relatives in intensive care units

AIM

This paper reports an exploratory study of nurses' experiences of caring for families who have relatives in adult intensive care units.

BACKGROUND

The admission of a critically ill patient into adult intensive care is universally accepted as a crisis for both patients and their families. Family members of critically ill people may experience emotional turmoil and therefore have many needs throughout the course of the relative's illness. It has been identified that nurses are best placed to meet families' needs. Whilst there is a substantial evidence base associated with family needs, little is known about nurses' experiences of caring for these families.

METHOD

Interviews, informed by Heideggerian philosophy, were conducted with a purposive sample of 12 Registered Nurses working in an adult intensive care unit. Interview transcripts were analysed using Colaizzi's framework. The data were collected in Autumn 2005.

FINDINGS

Participants' experiences were categorized into the following themes: defining the nurse's role, role expectations and role conflict. Participants reported lack of confidence, doubts about their professional competence and conflicts between their professional and personal self. These experiences were linked to participants' expectations and self-imposed standards.

CONCLUSION

Registered Nurses caring for families who have relatives in adult intensive care units face a fundamental conflict both between role expectations and patient care and between professional ideals and being a human. This not only highlights a disparity between nurses everyday family care practice and the underpinning theories but also may contribute to occupational stress.

Medical information and surrogate designation: results of a prospective study in elderly hospitalised patients

OBJECTIVES

To determine the preferences of French elderly inpatients concerning medical information and surrogate designation in life-threatening situations.

METHODS

Intention-to-act questionnaire was completed by two geriatricians during a patient interview in the week following admission in three geriatric units in France. The participants were elderly patients (> or =70 years) with adequate cognitive performance for decision making as assessed by the Mini Mental State Examination. The impact of socio-demographic factors, level of confidence in medical care, cognitive or physical disability on surrogate designation and amount of medical information expected were measured.

MEASUREMENTS

Impact of socio-demographic factors, level of confidence in medical care, cognitive or physical disability on surrogate designation and amount of medical information expected.

RESULTS

426 consecutive elderly patients were recruited. 32.6% wanted to receive complete information about their care and 77% declared they would want to be informed if they were in a life-threatening situation. 4.5% reported they would not want any medical information. A family member was designated as surrogate by 73% of the patients. In 28%, a second surrogate was also designated, usually the family physician (22%) or a member of the hospital medical staff (10%). Polytomous logistic regression analysis was used to assess determinants of the amount of information expected and social and medical parameters. MMSE score, the presence of physical disability, a low level of confidence in medicine and the presence of children were identified as independent determinants of a high level of information expectation.

CONCLUSION

Elderly hospitalised patients expressed a strong desire to receive extensive information and were willing to designate a surrogate in a life-threatening situation. The surrogate was usually a family member alone or with another person, usually a practitioner.

Care at the end of life in critically ill patients: the European perspective

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Care surrounding end-of-life has become a major topic in the intensive care medicine literature. Cultural and regional variations are associated with transatlantic debates about decisions to forego life-sustaining therapies and lead to recent international statements. The aim of this review is to provide insight into the decisions to forego life sustaining therapies and end-of-life care in Europe.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although decisions to forego life-sustaining therapies are increasingly made in European countries, frequency and characteristics of end-of-life care are still heterogeneous. Moreover, even though many determinants of these variations have been identified, epidemiologic and interventional studies still provide additional information. In agreement with public opinions, recent European laws have emphasized the patient's autonomy. In real life, advance care planning is rarely used. Decisions are often made by caregivers (physicians and nurses) or families, these latter being less involved than in North America. Not only ethic divergences between physicians but also cultural variations account for this disparity.

SUMMARY

To optimize end-of-life care in the intensive care unit, there is an urgent need for the development of palliative and multidisciplinary care in Europe. Furthermore, it highlights the need for culturally competent care, adapted to needs and values of every single patient and family. In addition, a lack of communication with families and within the medical team, an uninformed public about end-of-life issues, and insufficient training of intensive care unit staff are crucial barriers to end-of-life care development. Special awareness of professionals and innovative research are needed to promote a high-standard of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit.

Informed consent for research in ICU obtained before ICU admission

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the procedure of the informed consent for ICU research obtained before ICU admission.

DESIGN

Prospective, open, observational study.

SETTING

20-bed surgical ICU of a tertiary teaching university hospital and the ward before and after ICU.

PATIENTS

Patients, scheduled for elective cardiac surgery, who accepted to participate in a coagulation study.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients underwent the same informed consent procedure, including an oral presentation of the coagulation study and an informative leaflet the day before surgery on the ward.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Between January and August 2001, we included 38 patients; 36 survived ICU. Ten to 12 days after surgery, 8/36 (22%) patients did not know they had participated in a study, and 9/36 (25%) could not recall the study purpose and the related risk. Patients with incomplete recall stayed longer in ICU [median (range): 4 (3-6) vs 3 (1-5) days; p = 0.004]. None of these patients (0/9 vs 10/27; p < 0.04) had read the informative leaflet AND asked at least one question during the informed consent procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Even when the informed consent is obtained in the most optimal conditions for ICU research, its ethical value remains questionable. Indeed, a substantial number of patients were unaware of their study participation, or of the related purpose and risks. When the ICU stay is prolonged, we should at least repeatedly and actively (re)-inform patients about their study participation.

[Medical advance directives as instruments of patient self-determination]

Medical advance directives and durable powers of attorney for health care increasingly gain importance and recognition as instruments of patient self-determination. This article explores the various possibilities for advance directives as well as their ethical legal background. Furthermore, results of a current patient and population survey are presented, showing how (potential) patients think about the possibilities of advance directives. Finally, practical recommendations on how to deal with medical advance directives are given.

Half the family members of intensive care unit patients do not want to share in the decision-making process: A study in 78 French intensive care units*

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the opinions of intensive care unit staff and family members about family participation in decisions about patients in intensive care units in France, a country where the approach of physicians to patients and families has been described as paternalistic.

DESIGN

Prospective multiple-center survey of intensive care unit staff and family members.

SETTING

Seventy-eight intensive care units in university-affiliated hospitals in France.

PATIENTS

We studied 357 consecutive patients hospitalized in the 78 intensive care units and included in the study starting on May 1, 2001, with five patients included per intensive care unit.

INTERVENTIONS

We recorded opinions and experience about family participation in medical decision making. Comprehension, satisfaction, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores were determined in family members.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Poor comprehension was noted in 35% of family members. Satisfaction was good but anxiety was noted in 73% and depression in 35% of family members. Among intensive care unit staff members, 91% of physicians and 83% of nonphysicians believed that participation in decision making should be offered to families; however, only 39% had actually involved family members in decisions. A desire to share in decision making was expressed by only 47% of family members. Only 15% of family members actually shared in decision making. Effectiveness of information influenced this desire.

CONCLUSION

Intensive care unit staff should seek to determine how much autonomy families want. Staff members must strive to identify practical and psychological obstacles that may limit their ability to promote autonomy. Finally, they must develop interventions and attitudes capable of empowering families.

Parental role in medical decision-making: fact or fiction? A comparative study of ethical dilemmas in French and American neonatal intensive care units

Neonatal intensive care has been studied from an epidemiological, ethical, medical and even sociological perspective, but little is known about the impact of parental involvement in decision-making, especially in critical cases. We rely here on a comparative, case-based approach to study the parental role in decision-making within two technologically identical but culturally and institutionally different contexts: France and the United States. These contexts rely on two opposed models of decision-making: parental autonomy in the United States and medical paternalism in France. This paternalism model excludes parents from the decision-making process. We investigate whether parental involvement leads to different outcomes from exclusively medically determined decisions or whether "technological imperatives" outplay all other factors to shape a unique, 'medically optimal' outcome. Using empirical data generated from extensive ethnographic fieldwork, in-depth interviews with 60 clinicians and 71 parents and chart review over a year in two neonatal intensive care units (one in France and one in the US), we analyze the factors that can explain the observed differences in decision-making in medically identical cases. Parental involvement and the legal context play a less role than physicians' differential use of certainty versus uncertainty in prognosis, a conclusion that corroborates the fact that medical control over ethical dilemmas remains even in the context of autonomy. French physicians do not ask parents permission to withdraw care (as expected in a paternalistic context); but symmetrically, American neonatologists (despite the prevailing autonomy model) tend not to ask permission to continue. The study provides an analysis of the making of "ethics", with an emphasis on how decisions are conceptualized as ethical dilemmas. The final conclusion is that the ongoing medical authority on ethics remains the key issue.

Autonomy gone awry: a cross-cultural study of parents' experiences in neonatal intensive care units

This paper examines parents' experiences of medical decision-making and coping with having a critically ill baby in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) from a cross-cultural perspective (France vs. U.S.A.). Though parents' experiences in the NICU were very similar despite cultural and institutional differences, each system addresses their needs in a different way. Interviews with parents show that French parents expressed overall higher satisfaction with the care of their babies and were better able to cope with the loss of their child than American parents. Central to the French parents' perception of autonomy and their sense of satisfaction were the strong doctor-patient relationship, the emphasis on medical certainty in prognosis versus uncertainty in the American context, and the "sentimental work" provided by the team. The American setting, characterized by respect for parental autonomy, did not necessarily translate into full parental involvement in decision-making, and it limited the rapport between doctors and parents to the extent of parental isolation. This empirical comparative approach fosters a much-needed critique of philosophical principles by underscoring, from the parents' perspective, the lack of "emotional work" involved in the practice of autonomy in the American unit compared to the paternalistic European context. Beyond theoretical and ethical arguments, we must reconsider the practice of autonomy in particularly stressful situations by providing more specific means to cope, translating the impersonal language of "rights" and decision-making into trusting, caring relationships, and sharing the responsibility for making tragic choices.

Communication with family members of patients dying in the intensive care unit

In intensive care units the patient is usually unconscious and/or incompetent so that the relationship shifts to the family. Interactions between caregivers and families usually follow one of three models. In the first model, a family representative receives information from the caregivers but does not participate in decisions or physical care. In the second model, the ICU caregivers attempt to provide care consistent with the patient's wishes and values as described by the family. In the third model, the family members communicate their own wishes, provide physical care to the patient, and participate in medical decision-making. After a description of the studies that measured the quality of information provided to ICU families and by discussing the extent to which respecting the principle of patient autonomy is feasible in the ICU, we will review the literature on studies that identified specific needs of families of dying patients and specific challenges faced by intensivists as they seek to inform the families of dying patients. The need for family-centered care and for a better communication within the patient-family-caregiver trio is also highlighted.

Opinions about surrogate designation: a population survey in France

OBJECTIVE

Many patients go through periods when they are too ill to give consent or to participate in decisions. When this occurs, patient autonomy is best maintained when a surrogate designated by the patient and familiar with his or her values can speak for the patient. The objective of this study was to determine whether people who are not yet ill are ready to accept surrogate designation. Attitudes toward family participation in care were explored also.

DESIGN

Population survey by telephone. Because refusal of life-sustaining treatment is a dramatic example of patient autonomy, the survey used questions about ICU admission.

SETTING

General population in France.

SUBJECTS

Representative random sample of 8000 residents of France aged 18 yrs or more.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The survey investigated attitudes.

RESULTS

Most respondents said they would like to designate a surrogate (7205 [90%]) and to have their family share in their care (6691 [84%] for bathing, 5629 [70%] for feeding, and 4139 [52%] for tracheal suctioning) and in decisions about their management (6120 [76%]). Among respondents with a spouse, 79% said they would designate the spouse to speak for them. The attitudes were not influenced by ethnicity, religion or education level.

CONCLUSIONS

Most people living in France would want a surrogate to represent them should they be incompetent and admitted to an ICU. Primary care physicians should inform their patients about the benefits of discussing illness-related issues among friends and family.