Clinical outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament repair in recurrent (chronic) lateral patella dislocations

Patellofemoral instability part 1 (When to operate and soft tissue procedures): State of the art

Patellofemoral instability is usually initially treated non-operatively. Surgery is considered in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation and after a first-time patellar dislocation in the presence of either an associated osteochondral fracture or high risk of recurrence. Stratifying the risk of recurrence includes evaluating risk factors such as age, trochlear dysplasia, contralateral dislocation, and patellar height. Surgery with soft tissue procedures includes restoring the medial patellar restraints and balancing the lateral side of the joint. Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament is the most frequent way of addressing the medial soft tissues in patients with patellofemoral instability. Meanwhile, lateral tightness can be achieved by lateral retinaculum lengthening or release. Approaching patellofemoral instability in a patient-specific approach, combined with a shared decision-making process with the patient/family, will guide surgeons to the deliver optimal care for the patellar instability patient.

Trends and Complications of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Among Applicants for the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II and Maintenance of Certification Examinations: Analysis of Data Over a 15-Year Period

Background

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) and tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) are commonly performed surgical procedures that often have a high learning curve.

Purpose

To review the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part II oral examination case list and the Maintenance of Certification (MOC) examination case list databases for trends in MPFLR (isolated and with concurrent TTO) and complication rates.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

We reviewed the ABOS Part II and MOC case list databases for diagnosis codes relating to patellar instability and Current Procedural Terminology codes specific to MPFLR and TTO regarding cases submitted by applicants for these examinations between 2003 and 2017 (for ABOS Part II) and between 2010 and 2017 (for MOC). Data were analyzed using generalized estimating equations with a binomial distribution and logit link to determine how trends in MPFLR changed over the study period in these applicant groups (ABOS vs MOC) as well as any influence on complication rates.

Results

In the ABOS group, the number of MPFLRs performed by surgeons increased a mean 3% each year, ranging from 66 in 2003 to 184 in 2015 (injury rate ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.04; P < .001). In the MOC group, the mean number of MPFLRs did not change significantly (range, 119 in 2011 vs 230 in 2013; P = .772). In the ABOS group, after adjusting for patient age and examination year, MPFLR combined with TTO was associated with 92% greater odds of having a complication versus isolated MPFLR (odds ratio, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.24-2.98; P = .004), whereas the MOC group demonstrated no significant difference in the odds of having a complication between cases with versus without a concurrent TTO (P = .214).

Conclusion

In the current study, the number of MPFLRs performed by the less experienced surgeons in the ABOS group increased a mean 3% each year, whereas this number remained stable for the more experienced MOC group. Additionally, there were significantly more complications with MPFLR and concomitant TTO among the ABOS Part II candidates compared with the MOC candidates. These findings may be helpful in surgical decision making and education in patellofemoral instability.

Minipatellar Tunnels for Transosseous Fixation of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Graft Using High-strength Suture

Patellar dislocation is a common knee injury, with concomitant pathoanatomical risk factors that synergistically interact and predispose to patellofemoral instability. Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has demonstrated significant potential in the re-establishment of MPFL anatomic and biological function, with low patellar redislocation rates. Although many techniques for MPFL reconstruction have been developed, challenges such as patella fractures and high costs persist. Herein, to further reduce bone defects and ensure the reliability of fixation, we developed a microbone tracts technique for MPFL reconstruction on the patella side using high-strength sutures. This technique passes high-strength sutures through the microtransosseous tunnels to fix the tendon graft on the patella side, aiming to achieve minimized patella damage with no additional implants for graft fixation, while resuturing the fascia on the surface of the patella with the suture ends further strengthens the graft fixation. This technique provides an economic and reliable solution for graft fixation on the patella with minimal bone disruption.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Augmented With a Reinforced Bioinductive Implant Is Biomechanically Similar to the Native Medial Patellofemoral Ligament at Time Zero in a Cadaveric Model

Purpose

To biomechanically compare primary medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) repair (MPFLr) augmented with a reinforced bioinductive implant (RBI) to the native MPFL ligament and a semitendinosus (semi-T) MPFL reconstruction (MPFLR) at time zero.

Methods

Four fresh-frozen matched pair cadavers (8 knees) were used to biomechanically compare the native MPFL to augmented MPFLr (n = 4) and semi-T MPFLR (n = 4). The native MPFL (n = 8) was isolated, preserving the femoral and patellar attachments, and pulled to failure. The semi-T was harvested from 1 of the matched pairs and whipstitched, as was a 250-mm × 5-mm RBI. A standard double-bundle docking technique was utilized. The patella was potted and mechanically pulled parallel to the transverse axis until failure in both cohorts. Cyclic creep, load and displacement at failure, failure mode, and stiffness were recorded.

Results

Failure load was highest in the RBI with repair group (287 ± 130 N) compared to the native MPFL (219 ± 64 N) and the semi-T group (84 ± 29 N). No statistically significant difference in failure load between the RBI augmentation with repair group and the native ligament (P = .19) were found. The semi-T reconstruction group failed at the least amount of displacement (7.93 ± 3.4 mm) compared to the native MPFL (20.9 ± 9 mm) (P < .01) and the RBI with repair group (33.2 ± 17.7 mm) (P < .02). At 10 mm of displacement, the RBI group (8.3 ± 1.2 N/mm) demonstrated stiffness in the midrange compared to the native MPFL (14.1 ± 7.1 N/mm). Early anchor/tendon pullout failure on the patella side was noted in the semi-T group compared to the RBI group. One reconstruction was excluded from analysis due to poor bone quality.

Conclusions

No statistically significant difference was seen between the augmented MPFL repair and the native MPFL in load-to-failure testing. The augmented MPFL repair was observed to have biomechanical properties similar to the native MPFL. MPFLr with RBI augmentation provided consistent stiffness at clinically relevant displacement.

Clinical Relevance

Primary MPFL repair and reconstruction using the semi-T graft, while effective, are nevertheless imperfect procedures. MPFL repair has been shown to have higher instability recurrence rates, while the stiffness profile of MPFLR with semi-T is higher than the native MFPL and may lead to knee stiffness, loss of motion, or cartilage damage. The results of this time-zero biomechanical study indicate that the use of an RBI for augmentation of a primary MPFL repair may be a viable alternative to traditional MPFL repair or reconstruction using a semi-T graft.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Augmentation Repair for Primary Patellar Dislocation With Concomitant Chondral or Osteochondral Injury in Children and Adolescents: Outcomes at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Background

Treatment of primary patellar dislocation (PPD) with chondral or osteochondral injury without patellar stabilization in the adolescent population may lead to unsatisfactory outcomes. Surgical treatment, with or without traditional medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, is a topic of interest.

Purpose

To compare postoperative outcomes and rates of patellar redislocation and return to the operating room (OR) in patients who sustained a PPD with chondral or osteochondral injury and were surgically treated with versus without suture tape augmentation repair of the MPFL.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Adolescents who sustained a PPD with chondral or osteochondral injury confirmed via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and who were treated by a single surgeon between January 2009 and November 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped into those who underwent chondral or osteochondral treatment with suture tape augmentation repair of the MPFL (ST group; n = 20) and those who did not have suture tape augmentation or repair (no-ST group; n = 20; 11 patients within the no-ST group did undergo medial imbrication). Demographic characteristics, postoperative knee range of motion, pre- and postoperative radiographic measurements, and preoperative MRI parameters were recorded, and minimum 2-year patient-reported outcomes were collected. Data were compared between the ST and no-ST groups.

Results

The mean patient age was 15.02 years (range, 12.64-17.61 years) in the ST group and 14.18 years (range, 10.56-16.38 years) in the no-ST group, with a mean follow-up of 3.63 years (range, 2.01-6.11 years) in the ST group and 4.98 years (range, 2.23-9.03 years) in the no-ST group. Significantly more patients returned to the OR in the no-ST group compared with the ST group (7 [35%] vs 0 [0%]; P = .008). Further patellar stabilization with an MPFL allograft (n = 5) and manipulation under anesthesia (n = 2) were reasons for returning to the OR. There were no redislocation events in the ST group.

Conclusion

Treating PPDs with chondral or osteochondral injury using suture tape to augment and repair the MPFL has promising advantages over not repairing it-including lower rates of postoperative patellar instability and return to the OR.

The Adductor Sling Technique for Pediatric Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Better Resists Dislocation Loads When Compared With Adductor Transfer at Time Zero in a Cadaveric Model

Purpose

To characterize the ability of the intact medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and the adductor transfer and adductor sling MPFL reconstruction techniques to resist subluxation and dislocation in a cadaveric model.

Methods

Nine fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were placed on a custom testing fixture with the femur fixed parallel to the floor, the tibia placed in 20° of flexion, and the patella attached to a load cell. The patella was displaced laterally, and subluxation load (in newtons), dislocation load (in newtons), maximum failure load (in newtons), patellar displacement at failure, and mode of failure were recorded. Testing was conducted with the MPFL intact and after the adductor sling and adductor transfer reconstruction techniques. Statistical analysis was completed using 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance with the Holm-Šidák post hoc test.

Results

The subluxation load was not significantly different between groups. The native MPFL dislocation load was significantly higher than the dislocation loads of both reconstruction techniques, but no significant difference between the dislocation loads of the 2 reconstruction techniques occurred. The native MPFL failure load was significantly higher than the failure loads of both reconstruction techniques. The adductor sling failure load was significantly higher than the adductor transfer failure load. The mode of failure varied across groups. The native MPFL failed by femoral avulsion, patellar avulsion, and midsubstance tear. The main mode of failure for adductor transfer was pullout, whereas failure for the adductor sling technique most often occurred at the sutures. Most of the native MPFLs and all adductor sling reconstructions failed after dislocation. The adductor transfer reconstructions were much more variable, with failures spanning from before subluxation through dislocation.

Conclusions

Our cadaveric model showed that neither the adductor transfer technique nor the adductor sling technique restored failure load to that of the native condition. There was no significant difference in the subluxation or dislocation loads between the 2 MPFL reconstructions, but the adductor sling technique resulted in a higher load to failure. The adductor transfer technique frequently failed before subluxation or dislocation when compared with the adductor sling technique and the native MPFL.

Clinical Relevance

The best technique for MPFL reconstruction in patients with open physes is a topic of debate. Given the long-term consequences of MPFL injury and potential for growth plate disturbance, it is important to study MPFL reconstruction techniques thoroughly, including in the laboratory setting.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction With or Without Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy in Carefully Selected Patients Results in a 5% Revision Rate: A Preliminary Analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose was to assess the outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) allograft reconstruction with or without tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) in adolescents, with a focus on evaluating demographic and imaging characteristics on outcomes.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective study was performed of patients ages 12 to 19 years who underwent MPFL reconstruction +/- TTO for the treatment of lateral patellar instability. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and postoperative information was collected. All x-ray and magnetic resonance imaging measurements were completed independently by 2 surgeons. Patients were contacted to complete patient-reported outcomes at a minimum of 2 years following surgery. The primary outcome measure was recurrent instability resulting in revision surgery.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight knees in 74 patients, with a median age of 15.3 years (interquartile range: 14.4, 16.1), were included. Forty-five knees underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction and 33 knees had a combined MPFL + TTO. The knees that underwent MPFL + TTO had significantly greater tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance (19.0 mm vs. 15.4 mm, P =0.015) and patellar tendon-lateral trochlear ridge distance (10.9 mm vs. 5.9 mm, P =0.018) than the knees treated with isolated MPFL reconstruction. Four knees (5.1%) underwent revision stabilization surgery, including 3 knees in the MPFL cohort (6.7%) and 1 knee in the MPFL + TTO cohort (3.0%). The rate of failure between the MPFL and MPFL + TTO knees was not significantly different, P =0.634. There were no differences in age, sex, body mass index, number of dislocations, or any imaging characteristics in patients who underwent revision versus those who did not. Patient-reported outcomes were collected on 50 knees at a median of 36 months (interquartile range: 24, 54) after surgery, and no differences were noted between cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Patellar stabilization surgery, including MPFL reconstruction and TTO in carefully selected patients, had excellent revision-free outcomes in 95% of this adolescent cohort. In this case series, those patients whose treatment included TTO had greater tibial tubercle-trochlear groove and patellar tendon-lateral trochlear ridge as compared to the isolated MPFL cohort. Despite previous literature suggesting demographic and imaging characteristics as risks for recurrent instability, we identified no characteristics within these two distinct surgical treatment groups to be predictive of the need for revision stabilization, regardless of the treatment group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective comparison study.

Comparison of Failure Rates at Long-term Follow-up Between MPFL Repair and Reconstruction for Recurrent Lateral Patellar Instability

Background

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the primary soft tissue restraint to lateral patellar translation and is often disrupted by lateral patellar dislocation. Surgical management for recurrent patellar instability focuses on restoring the MPFL function with repair or reconstruction techniques. Recent studies have favored reconstruction over repair; however, long-term comparative studies are limited.

Purpose

To compare long-term clinical outcomes, complications, and recurrence rates of isolated MPFL reconstruction and MPFL repair for recurrent lateral patellar instability.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 55 patients (n = 58 knees) with recurrent lateral patellar instability were treated between 2005 and 2012 with either MPFL repair or MPFL reconstruction. The exclusion criteria were previous or concomitant tibial tubercle osteotomy or trochleoplasty and follow-up of <8 years. Pre- and postoperative descriptive, surgical, imaging, and clinical data were recorded for each patient.

Results

MPFL repair was performed on 26 patients (n = 29 knees; 14 women, 15 men), with a mean age of 18.4 years. MPFL reconstruction was performed on 29 patients (n = 29 knees; 18 women, 11 men), with a mean age of 18.2 years. At a mean follow-up of 12 years (range, 8.3-18.9 years), the reconstruction group had a significantly lower rate of recurrent dislocation compared with the repair group (14% vs 41%; P = .019). There were no differences in the number of preoperative dislocations or tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance. The reconstruction group had significantly more time from initial injury to surgery compared with the repair group (median, 1460 days vs 627 days; P = .007). There were no differences in postoperative Tegner, Lysholm, or Kujala scores at the final follow-up. In addition, no statistically significant differences were detected in return to sport (RTS) rates (repair [81%] vs reconstruction [75%]; P = .610) or reoperation rates for recurrent instability (repair [21%] vs reconstruction [7%]; P = .13).

Conclusion

MPFL repair resulted in a nearly 3-fold higher rate of recurrent patellar dislocation (41% vs 14%) at the long-term follow-up compared with MPFL reconstruction. Given this disparate rate, the authors recommend MPFL reconstruction over repair because of the lower failure rate and similar, if not superior, clinical outcomes and RTS.

Potential of patellar height measurement methods in predicting recurrent patellar dislocation incidence: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) is a multifactorial disease that affects young and active people. Patellar height measurements are used clinically to screen and diagnose knee conditions. However, there are no known studies that have assessed and compared the performance of patellar height indices for predicting the incidence of RPD, which could be used to recommend surgical treatment after primary patellar dislocation. This case-control study aimed to determine if the patellar height index could be used to predict the incidence of RPD, and to identify the optimal method in terms of its diagnostic ability for RPD.

METHOD

Altogether, 133 patients (52 patients with RPD [Group R] and 81 sex- and age-matched controls [Group C]) were enrolled in this study. The Insall-Salvati (IS), Blackburne-Peel (BP), Caton-Deschamps (CD), and modified IS (mIS) methods were used to measure the patellar height index. The intra-observer and inter-observer reliabilities of these four methods were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive ability of each index and identify the cut-off values that indicated significantly increased risk of RPD.

RESULTS

Patient demographics were similar between the two groups. The inter-observer and intra-observer reliabilities were good for all four methods. In patients with RPD, the mean index values for the four methods were significantly higher than those in the matched controls. The area under the curve (AUC) values for IS, BP, CD, and mIS were 0.91 (standard error [SE], 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.96), 0.72 (SE, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.63-0.81), 0.86 (SE, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.79-0.92), and 0.96 (SE, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patellar height indices had high predictive performance for the incidence of RPD. The mIS method had the highest AUC.

Is Patellar Instability a Contraindication to Semiextended Tibial Nailing?: A Case Report

CASE

We report a 40-year-old woman with undiagnosed patellofemoral instability that worsened 8 months after intramedullary nailing of a distal left tibia fracture in the semiextended position through a partial medial parapatellar approach. Patella stability and asymptomatic knee function were restored after IM nail removal, medial patellofemoral ligament repair, and left tibial tubercle transposition.

CONCLUSION

The optimal surgical approach for tibial IM nailing in patients with chronic patellar instability has not been described. Clinicians should be cognizant of the potential for worsening patellofemoral instability in these patients when using the medial parapatellar approach in the semiextended position.

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using nonresorbable sutures yields comparable outcomes to reconstruction with a pedicled quadriceps tendon autograft when performed in addition to bony risk factor correction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results for reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament using synthetic nonresorbable sutures (S-MPFL-R) in comparison to MPFL-R using quadriceps tendon autograft (QT-MPFL-R) in patients undergoing simultaneous correction of anatomic risk factors for lateral patellar instability (LPI) at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up.

METHODS

Between November 2018 and June 2019, 19 patients (male/female 8/11; mean age 26 ± 7 years) underwent S-MPFL-R (FiberTape^®) in combination with the correction of predisposing risk factors for LPI. The control group of 38 patients (male/female 16/22, mean age 26 ± 6 years) who underwent QT-MPFL-R was matched 1:2 by sex, age, anatomic risk factors, and concomitant surgical correction of bony risk factors. The Banff Patella Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) and a numerical analog scale (NAS 0-10) for patellofemoral pain and subjective knee joint function were used to assess patients' reported quality of life before and after surgery.

RESULTS

The BPII 2.0 score increased from 35.0 ± 21.7 points to 79.7 ± 13.3 points (p < 0.0001) in the S-MPRL-R group and from 44.3 ± 19.6 points to 80.9 ± 15 points (p < 0.0001) in the QT-MPFL-R group from preoperatively to postoperatively, respectively, without any significant difference between the groups. In the S-MPFL-R group and QT-MPFL-R group, 95% (18/19) and 92% (35/38) of patients, respectively, crossed the minimally clinically important difference reported for the BPII 2.0. NAS values for pain and subjective knee joint function improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001) without any significant difference between the groups at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that nonresorbable sutures can serve as a viable option for MPFL-R, yielding comparable outcomes compared to quadriceps tendon autograft reconstruction when performed concomitantly with the correction of anatomic risk factors for LPI. This option reduces the need for autologous tendon harvesting or the use of allografts for MPFL-R.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Diagnostic Value of MRI and Radiographs of the Knee to Identify Osteochondral Lesions in Acute Patellar Instability

The purpose of this study was to define the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and plain radiographs (X-ray [XR]) in identifying an osteochondral defect or loose body in patients undergoing operative treatment for patellar instability. A total of 87 patients treated operatively for patellar instability with medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction between 2015 and 2019 were identified. Inclusion criteria were evidence of clinical patellar instability, preoperative XR and MRI studies, and concomitant diagnostic knee arthroscopy and MPFL reconstruction performed to address patellar instability. Patients were excluded if they had a history of prior procedure for patellar instability on the surgical knee, underwent MPFL reconstruction without concomitant diagnostic knee arthroscopy, or had an anterior cruciate ligament or posterior cruciate ligament deficient knee. Operative notes and arthroscopic images were reviewed to identify osteochondral or chondral injuries and loose bodies noted during diagnostic arthroscopy. The primary outcome was the identification of intra-articular loose bodies, chondral injury, or osteochondral defect on preoperative plain radiographs and MRI in patients with patellar instability. All MRIs were performed on a 3T MRI. The sensitivity and specificity of identifying loose bodies on MRI were 0.52 and 0.92 and on XR were 0.23 and 0.98, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of identifying osteochondral lesions on MRI were 0.43 and 0.81 and on XR were 0.08 and 0.97, respectively. Of the 87 available reports, 45 (51%) described performing chondroplasty for Outerbridge grade II/III chondral lesions on diagnostic arthroscopy. In conclusion, MRI and XR are poorly sensitive at identifying loose bodies or osteochondral defects after patellar dislocations. The poor sensitivity of imaging studies must be considered when determining whether or not to recommend operative management to a patient with patellar instability. This is a Level IV, diagnostic study.

Medial Plication Using an Arthroscopic All-Inside Technique for Treatment of Patellar Instability in Adolescents

The purpose of this study was to present a medial plication using an arthroscopic all-inside technique for the treatment of patellar instability in adolescents. From July 2009 to June 2012, 19 patients with acute patellar dislocation were operated by this technique. Of these patients, follow-up was available in 17 patients at an average of 3 years (range: 1.5-4 years). At the follow-up, we evaluated the patients with physical examinations, radiographs, computed tomography scan, as well as the Lysholm and Kujala scoring scales. No recurrence of patellar instability has been found. The recovery of knee mobilization resulted to be good. We think this could be a valid technique to treat patellar instability in adolescents with less associated morbidity and good cosmetic results.

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with simultaneous osteochondral fracture fixation is an effective treatment for adolescent patellar dislocation with osteochondral fractures

BACKGROUND

Osteochondral fractures can occur during patellar dislocation and often require treatment. The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of recurrent instability and second surgery following osteochondral fracture fixation with concomitant medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a cohort of 365 medial patellofemoral ligament reconstructions by a single surgeon from 2008 to 2019 was performed to identify patients who underwent simultaneous osteochondral fracture fixation with bioabsorbable nails. Demographic data, surgical details, clinical follow-up, and subsequent procedures were collected.

RESULTS

Forty medial patellofemoral ligament reconstructions with osteochondral fracture fixation were performed by a single surgeon from 2008 to 2019. The average age at surgery was 14.6 years (range 10.7-19.6 years). The average length of follow-up was 2.6 years (range 0.7-7.0 years). Eleven (28%) patients required a second surgery on the ipsilateral knee. One patient had recurrent instability and required revision medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and osteochondral allograft. The other 10 patients underwent a second surgery to address cartilage damage or debridement of nails. Of the four patients who required nail debridement, the average number of nails initially placed was 7 ± 1.7. This was significantly more than the patients who did not require second surgery related to nail debridement (4.1 ± 1.6, p < .05).

CONCLUSION

28% of patients required a second procedure, most of which involved debridement of unhealed portions of the osteochondral fracture. At 2.6-year follow-up, only 2% of patients had a failure of their osteochondral fracture fixation requiring a cartilage restoration procedure. Osteochondral fracture fixation in adolescents with patellofemoral instability can be effectively treated with fixation and simultaneous medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

level IV.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Repair for Recurrent Patellar Instability: Successful Outcomes Among Patients With Low Coronal Malalignment and Normal Patellar Height

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) repair is discouraged for the treatment of chronic, recurrent patellar instability (RPI) because of high reported failure rates. However, the senior author uses MPFL repair for chronic RPI in the setting of low tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance. In this retrospective case series, we report results and evaluate outcome predictors. We used billing records to identify all patients, 14 years or older, who underwent isolated repair for chronic RPI performed by a single surgeon between September 2010 and February 2019. The TT-TG distance, patellar height (Caton-Deschamps Index [CDI]), and trochlear depth were measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging; postoperative reports were reviewed; and post hoc Kuala scores were obtained to extend outcome length. Patellar dislocation or revision surgery was considered a failure. Nonfailures were categorized as excellent or fair, based on the most recent report. Univariable generalized estimating equation models were used to evaluate associations of predictors (radiographic parameters, age, ligamentous laxity, primary presenting complaint) with failure and/or success. A total of 93 isolated MPFL repairs were performed. After exclusions were made for workers' compensation insurance (n=4), substance abuse (n=3), major secondary trauma less than 3 months postoperatively (n=3), and follow-up of less than 12 months (n=42), 41 knees (38 patients) had median follow-up of 32 months (interquartile range, 19-48 months). All repairs were patellar sided. Outcomes for 4 knees were considered failures, 23 were excellent, and 14 were fair. Only increased CDI was associated with increased risk of failure (odds ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.98-2.92; P=.06). Mean CDI was 1.23 mm (SD, 0.13 mm) for failures vs 1.08 mm (SD, 0.16 mm) for nonfailures. Failure rate was less than 10% following patellar-sided MPFL repair for treatment of chronic RPI among patients with low TT-TG distance. Increased patellar height was associated with higher risk of failure. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(1):e23-e29.].

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Repair or Medial Advancement: Is There a Role?

Patellar instability is one of the most prevalent knee disorders, with dislocations occurring in 5 to 43 cases per 10,000 annually. Traumatic patellar dislocation can result in significant morbidity and is associated with patellofemoral chondral injuries and fractures, medial soft tissue disruption, pain, and reduced function, and can lead to patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Chronic and recurrent instability can lead to deformation and incompetence of the medial soft tissue stabilizers. Despite recent gains in understanding the pathoanatomy of this disorder, the management of patients with this condition is complex and remains enigmatic.

Ability of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction to Overcome Lateral Patellar Motion in the Presence of Trochlear Flattening: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

BACKGROUND

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is an established operative procedure to restore medial restraining force in patients with patellar instability. In the setting of a shallow sulcus, it is unclear whether an isolated MPFL reconstruction is sufficient to restore patellofemoral stability.

HYPOTHESIS

Progressively increasing the sulcus angle would have an adverse effect on the ability of an MPFL reconstruction to restrain lateral patellar motion.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were harvested and prepared for experimentation. Each specimen was run through the following test conditions: native, lateral retinacular release, lateral retinacular repair, MPFL release, MPFL reconstruction, and MPFL reconstruction with trochlear flattening. Four 3-dimensional printed wedges (10°, 20°, 30°, and 40°) were created to insert beneath the native trochlea to raise the sulcus angle incrementally and simulate progressive trochlear flattening. For each test condition, the knee was positioned at 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45° of flexion, and the force required to displace the patella 1 cm laterally at 10 mm/s was measured. Group comparisons were made with repeated measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS

In the setting of an MPFL reconstruction, as the trochlear groove was incrementally flattened, the force required to laterally displace the patella progressively decreased. A 10° increase in the sulcus angle significantly reduced the force at 15° (P = .01) and 30° (P = .03) of knee flexion. The force required to laterally displace the patella was also significantly lower at all knee flexion angles after the addition of the 20°, 30°, and 40° wedges (P≤ .05). Specifically, a 20° increase in the sulcus angle reduced the force by 29% to 36%; a 30° increase, by 35% to 43%; and a 40° increase, by 40% to 47%.

CONCLUSION

Despite an MPFL reconstruction, the force required to laterally displace the patella decreased as the sulcus angle was increased in our cadaveric model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

An isolated MPFL reconstruction may not be sufficient to restore patellar stability in the setting of a shallow or flat trochlea. Patients with an abnormal sulcus angle may have recurrent instability postoperatively if treated with an isolated MPFL reconstruction.

Comparing Nonoperative Treatment, MPFL Repair, and MPFL Reconstruction for Patients With Patellar Dislocation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Background:

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, MPFL repair, and nonoperative treatment are important treatments for patients with patellar dislocation. However, it is unclear which treatment leads to better outcomes.

Purpose:

To determine the efficacy and safety of the 3 treatments in the treatment of patellar dislocation and compare the effect of MPFL reconstruction with MPFL repair, MPFL reconstruction with nonoperative treatment, and MPFL repair with nonoperative treatment.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

The PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), and Wanfang databases were searched from inception to December 2020. Included were clinical studies that described the efficacy and safety of 2 of the 3 treatments, studies directly comparing the clinical effects of the 2 operative techniques, or studies comparing the effects of reconstruction or repair with nonoperative treatment. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tools. The outcomes evaluated were postoperative redislocation rate, revision rate, complications, and Kujala score. We used traditional direct pairwise meta-analysis as well as network meta-analysis for comprehensive efficacy of all 3 treatment measures.

Results:

Twelve studies were included: 5 compared MPFL reconstruction with MPFL repair, 2 compared MPFL reconstruction with nonoperative treatment, and 5 compared MPFL repair with nonoperative treatment. The risk of bias was serious in 4, moderate in 4 and low in 4 articles. MPFL reconstruction led to significantly reduced redislocation and improved Kujala scores compared with MPFL repair and nonoperative treatment. MPFL repair led to reduced redislocation rates compared with nonoperative treatment but did not show an obvious benefit in primary dislocations. There was no significant difference among the 3 treatments in terms of revision rate and incidence of complications, although we found that treatment-related complications were least likely to occur in nonoperative treatment.

Conclusion:

The results of this review indicate that MPFL reconstruction decreases recurrent dislocation compared with MPFL repair or nonoperative treatment, but it has a higher possibility of complications. MPFL repair resulted in less postoperative redislocation than nonoperative treatment but did not show an obvious benefit in primary dislocation.

Femoral interference screw insertion significantly increases graft tension in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

This study aimed to quantify the effect of interference screw insertion on MPFL graft tension when securing the femoral attachment after patellar fixation. It was hypothesized that interference screw insertion significantly increases graft tension.

METHODS

Ten fresh frozen human cadaveric femurs were utilized to compare graft tension at three different preloading conditions (2 N, 5 N, 10 N) using a tensile testing machine (Admet Inc., Norwood, MA). Each preloading condition was analyzed with varying graft sizes (5-8 mm), tunnel diameters (7-9 mm), and interference screw sizes (7-9 mm). Non-parametric statistical analysis was utilized to compare testing conditions among each other.

RESULTS

Graft tension significantly increased after interference screw insertion by 100% to 552%, with 2 N preload showing the greatest increase (p < 0.001). Grafts with a larger diameter (7-8 mm) had a significantly greater increase in tension than smaller grafts (5-6 mm), regardless of preloading conditions (p < 0.001). Interference screw size had no influence on graft tension (n.s.). A graft-tunnel interference (tunnel diameter-graft diameter) fit of 0 mm and 1 mm significantly increased graft tension for each preloading condition when compared to a slightly looser fit of ≥ 2 mm (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Femoral interference screw insertion significantly increases graft tension in MPFL reconstruction even in low preloading conditions, with graft size and graft-tunnel interference fit having a considerably effect on graft tension. Surgeons should be aware of the inadvertent increases in graft tension even in low preloading conditions to mitigate the risk of graft overtensioning.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Suture Tape for Patellofemoral Joint Instability

Objective

To describe a surgical technique using suture tape for reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). This technique restores the stability of the reconstructed ligament and has excellent postoperative outcomes.

Method

This is a retrospective analysis. From January 2016 to June 2018, 17 patients underwent MPFL reconstruction using high‐strength suture (FiberTape; Arthrex) augmentation, with at least 12 months of follow up. There were 11 female and 6 male patients. The mean age at the time of MPFL reconstruction was 22.1 years (range 13–34 years). Clinical outcomes included pain level, knee range of motion, passive patellar hypermobility, and maltracking at follow‐up. The lateral patellofemoral angles, congruence angles, and patellar tilt angles were measured in a skyline view by CT at 30° of knee flexion at 12 months. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Lysholm knee scoring scale, the SF‐12 score, the Tegner score, and the Crosby and Insall grading system at yearly follow‐up.

Result

No patients were lost at the last follow up. One patient had recurrence of patellar dislocation and none of the others had serious complications. The success rate of MPFL repair for preventing recurrent dislocations was 94.1% (16 of 17 knees). Fifteen knees had full range of motion of more than 130°. At follow‐up, 2 knees were judged to have mild hypermobility and none had severe hypermobility or maltracking. Using the Crosby and Insall grading system, 12 knees (70.6%) were graded as excellent, 4 knees (23.5%) as good, 1 knee (5.9%) as fair to poor, and none as worse at the last follow‐up assessment. In all patients, the Lysholm knee score (55.12 ± 13.52 vs 79.88 ± 7.50, P < 0.01), the SF‐12 score (47 ± 9.53 vs 65.24 ± 12.82, P < 0.01), and the Tegner score (2.76 ± 1.39 vs 6.53 ± 1.70, P < 0.01) had improved at their 12‐month follow up. Compared with preoperative radiological findings, there was a significant improvement in lateral patellofemoral angle (−10.24 ± 7.10 vs 6 ± 5.43, P < 0.01), patellar tilt angle (26.53 ± 7.23 vs 9.88 ± 4.24, P < 0.01), and congruence angle (29.59 ± 11.95 vs −8.65 ± 4.86, P < 0.01).

Conclusion

The use of FiberTape in MPFL reconstruction can improve the stability of the knee following surgery and has good midterm clinical results and low complication rates.

Comparison of Ligament Isometry and Patellofemoral Contact Pressures for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Techniques in Skeletally Immature Patients

BACKGROUND

Adult medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction techniques are not appropriate for the skeletally immature patient given the proximity of the distal femoral physis. Biomechanical consequences of reconstructions aimed at avoiding the physis have not been adequately studied.

PURPOSE

To quantify the biomechanical effects of MPFL reconstruction techniques intended for skeletally immature patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Four MPFL reconstruction techniques were evaluated using a computationally augmented cadaveric model: (1) Schoettle point: adult-type reconstruction; (2) epiphyseal: socket distal to the femoral physis; (3) adductor sling: graft wrapped around the adductor tendon; (4) adductor transfer: adductor tendon transferred to patella. A custom testing frame was used to cycle 8 knees for each technique from 10° to 110° of flexion. Patellofemoral kinematics were recorded using a motion camera system, contact stresses were recorded using Tekscan pressure sensors, and MPFL length was computed using an inverse kinematics computational model. Change in MPFL length, patellar facet forces, and patellar kinematics were compared using generalized estimating equation modeling.

RESULTS

Schoettle point reconstruction was the most isometric, demonstrating isometry from 10° to 100°. The epiphyseal technique was isometric until 60°, after which the graft loosened with increasing flexion. The adductor sling and adductor transfer techniques were significantly more anisometric from 40° to 110°. Both grafts tightened with knee flexion and resulted in significantly more lateral patellar tilt versus the intact state in early flexion and significantly higher contact forces on the medial facet versus the epiphyseal technique in late flexion.

CONCLUSION

In this cadaveric simulation, the epiphyseal technique allowed for a more isometric ligament until midflexion, when the patella engaged within the trochlear groove. The adductor sling and adductor transfer grafts became tighter in flexion, resulting in potential loss of motion, pain, graft stretching, and failure. Marginal between-condition differences in patellofemoral contact mechanics and patellar kinematics were observed in late flexion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In the skeletally immature patient, using an epiphyseal type MPFL reconstruction with the femoral attachment site distal to the physis results in a more isometric graft compared with techniques with attachment sites proximal to the physis.

Estudo biomecânico de diferentes dispositivos de fixação femoral na reconstrução do ligamento patelofemoral medial em joelhos de suínos

Objetivo Avaliar diferentes dispositivos de fixação femoral na reconstrução do ligamento patelofemoral medial para comparar sua eficácia quanto à força de fixação até a falha em joelhos suínos.

Métodos Foram ensaiados 30 joelhos de suínos subdivididos em 3 grupos de 10 joelhos. Os enxertos retirados foram dissecados de tendões extensores das patas dos suínos. Cada grupo teve o enxerto fixado ao fêmur com parafuso de interferência, âncora, ou tenodese no tendão adutor. Os 3 métodos foram submetidos à testes biomecânicos utilizando uma máquina universal de ensaio de tração com uma velocidade de 20 mm/min.

Resultados Verificamos que a média mais elevada da resistência linear sob tração lateral (185,45 ± 41,22 N) ocorreu no grupo 1: “fixação por parafuso,” seguido do grupo 2: “fixação por âncora” (152,97 ± 49,43 N), e a média foi menor no grupo 3: “fixação por tenodese” (76,69 ± 18,90 N). Para a margem de erro fixada (5%), comprovou-se a diferença significativa entre os grupos (p < 0,001) e também através dos testes de comparações múltiplas (entre os pares de grupos) verificou-se a ocorrência de diferenças significativas. A variabilidade expressada por meio do coeficiente de variação mostrou-se reduzida, já que a referida medida foi inferior a 33,3%.

Conclusão O uso de parafusos de interferência no túnel ósseo de joelhos porcinos é suficientemente forte para fixação femoral na reconstrução do ligamento patelofemoral medial, assim como a fixação com âncoras montáveis com fio de alta resistência. Entretanto, a tenodese no tendão adutor mostrou-se frágil para essa finalidade.

Combined medial patellofemoral and medial patellotibial reconstruction for patellar instability: a PRISMA systematic review

BACKGROUND

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) works in association with the medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL) and the medial patellomeniscal ligament (MPML) to impart stability to the patellofemoral joint. The anatomy and biomechanical characteristics of the MPFL have been well described but little is known about the MPTL and MPML. Several reconstruction procedures of the MPFL with semitendinosus, gracilis, patellar and quadriceps tendons, allografts and synthetic grafts have been described. No clear superiority of one surgical technique over another is evident.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were articles that reported clinical outcomes of combined reconstruction of MPTL and MPFL. The methodological quality of the articles was determined using the modified Coleman Methodology Score (CMS).

RESULTS

Nine articles were included, reporting the clinical outcomes of 197 operated knees. The surgical procedures described include hamstrings grafting and transfer of the medial patellar and quadriceps tendons with or without bony procedures to reconstruct the MPTL in association with the MPFL. Overall, good and excellent outcomes were achieved. The median CMS is 70.6 ± 14.4 (range 38 to 84).

CONCLUSION

Different techniques are reported, and outcomes are good with low rates of recurrence. The quality of the articles is variable, ranging from low to high. Appropriately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to better understand what the adequate indications for surgery in patients with patellar instability and clinical outcomes are. Combined reconstruction of MPFL and MPTL leads to favourable clinical outcomes, supporting its role as a valid surgical procedure for patellar stabilization.

A proposed safety angle for dual bundle MPFL reconstruction: an observational magnetic resonance imaging study

INTRODUCTION

The anatomical dual bundle medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction technique is one of the surgical techniques used to treat lateral patellar instability. This commonly involves the creation of two patella bone tunnels through which the limbs of the grafts are inserted. The surgical risks include patellar fracture and penetration of patellofemoral articular surface. Thus, an easily reproducible intra-operative guiding parameter is useful to reduce such complications.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to demarcate a safe working zone in the axial plane for the patella tunnels.

METHODS

In this pilot study, we projected patella bone tunnels on the MRI knee images of 201 male patients with intact MPFLs. Two tunnel projections, superior and inferior, are made from the medial to the lateral sides of the patella. The projection of each superior and inferior tunnel is subdivided into three different angles in the axial plane. The tunnel length, thickness of the bone anterior to each tunnel and safety angle are measured. The safety angle refers to the angle between the longitudinal axis of each tunnel and the horizontal plane of the patella.

RESULTS

Our current study population consisted of 201 male patients (104 Wiberg type 1, 97 Wiberg type 2, no type 3 or 4). For the superior tunnels, the tunnel lengths are 14.8 mm, 24.3 mm and 27.2 mm. The respective safety angles are 24.9 degrees, 24.5 degrees and 8.8 degrees. The thickness of the bone anterior to the tunnels are 5.9 mm, 2.5 mm and 6.2 mm. For the inferior tunnels, the tunnel lengths are 18.4 mm, 21.9 mm and 34.9 mm. The respective safety angles are 23.5 degrees, 22.5 degrees and 8.5 degrees. The thickness of the bone anterior to the respective tunnels are 5.9 mm, 3.1 mm and 6.0 mm.

CONCLUSION

The proposed safety angle of 8.8 degree for the superior tunnel, and 8.5 degrees for the inferior tunnel is a potentially useful intra-operative guide for the surgeon and can potentially reduce the risks of fracture and articular cartilage injury in patellae with Wiberg 1 and 2 morphologies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, retrospective study.

Editorial Commentary: Repair or Reconstruct? Addressing Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Insufficiency in the Absence of Morphologic Abnormalities

The role of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) repair versus reconstruction in the treatment of patellar instability continues to undergo debate. Repair of the ligament can be technically less demanding with fewer risks of morbidity, whereas reconstruction carries concerns of graft malpositioning or over-tensioning as well as the risk of patellar fracture. Studies directly comparing the 2 procedures in the setting of recurrent patellar instability have consisted of small series or low levels of evidence that inevitably include patients with concurrent morphologic risk factors such as tuberosity malalignment or patella alta, which are known factors that can influence the biomechanical behavior of the MPFL. Heterogeneity in patient-related risk factors and surgical techniques continues to pose limitations in allowing for direct comparisons between procedures. For the treatment of recurrent patellar instability in the setting of no (or concurrently addressed) morphologic abnormalities, MPFL reconstruction has become a common procedure and generally preferred approach. The superior outcomes associated with reconstruction over repair, however, should be qualified with the fact that attention to the critical details of the technique, including graft position and tension, is paramount to success when performing this procedure.

Repair of the medial patellofemoral ligament with suture tape augmentation leads to similar primary contact pressures and joint kinematics like reconstruction with a tendon graft: a biomechanical comparison

PURPOSE

To compare suture tape-augmented MPFL repair with allograft MPFL reconstruction using patellofemoral contact pressure and joint kinematics to assess the risk of patellofemoral over-constrainment at point zero.

METHODS

A total of ten fresh frozen cadaveric knee specimens were tested in four different conditions of the MPFL: (1) native, (2) cut, (3) reconstructed with tendon graft, and (4) augmented with suture tape. The patellofemoral mean pressure (MP), peak pressure (PP) and contact area (CA) were measured independently for the medial and lateral compartments using pressure-sensitive films. Patellar tilt (PT) and shift (PS) were measured using an optical 3D motion tracking system. Measurements were recorded at 0°, 10°, 20°, 30°, 60° and 90° of flexion. Both the tendon graft and the internal brace were preloaded with 2 N, 5 N, and 10 N.

RESULTS

There was no significant differences found between surgical methods for medial MP, medial PP, medial CA, lateral MP and PS at any preload or flexion angle. Significant differences were seen for lateral PP at 20° knee flexion and 10 N preload (suture tape vs. reconstruction: 1045.9 ± 168.7 kPa vs. 1003.0 ± 151.9 kPa; p = 0.016), for lateral CA at 10° knee flexion and 10 N preload (101.4 ± 39.5 mm² vs. 108.7 ± 36.6 mm²; p = 0.040), for PT at 10° knee flexion and 2 N preload (- 1.9 ± 2.5° vs. - 2.5 ± 2.3°; p = 0.033) and for PT at 0° knee flexion and 10 N preload (- 0.8 ± 2.5° vs. - 1.8 ± 3.1°; p = 0.040). A preload of 2 N on the suture tape was the closest in restoring the native joint kinematics.

CONCLUSIONS

Suture tape augmentation of the MPFL resulted in similar primary contact pressures and joint kinematics in comparison with MPFL reconstruction using a tendon graft. A pretension of 2 N was found to restore the knee joint closest to normal patellofemoral kinematics.

Recurrent Patellofemoral Instability in the Pediatric Patient: Management and Pitfalls

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of the review is to discuss the relevant pathoanatomy, management, complications, and technical considerations for recurrent patellofemoral instability (PFI) in the pediatric population. Special consideration is given to recent literature and management of the patient with repeat instability following surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patellar stabilization surgery is in principle dependent upon restoration of normal patellofemoral anatomy and dynamic alignment. Historically, treatment options have been numerous and include extensor mechanism realignment, trochleoplasty, and more recently repair and/or reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) as a dynamic check rein during initial knee flexion. In skeletally immature patients, preference is given to physeal-sparing soft tissue procedures. While medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction has become a popular option, postoperative failure is a persistent issue with rates ranging from 5 to 30% for PFI surgery in general without any single procedure (e.g., distal realignment, MPFL reconstruction) demonstrating clear superiority. Failure of surgical patellar stabilization is broadly believed to occur for three main reasons: (1) technical failure of the primary stabilization method, (2) unaddressed static and dynamic pathoanatomy during the primary stabilization, and (3) intrinsic risk factors (e.g., collagen disorders, ligamentous laxity). PFI is a common orthopedic condition affecting the pediatric and adolescent population. Treatment of repeat instability following surgery in the PFI patient requires understanding and addressing underlying pathoanatomic risk factors as well as risks and reasons for failure.

Management of the First Patellar Dislocation: A Narrative Review

First patellar dislocation is a common injury of the knee, involving often adolescents and the active population. The consequences of the first episode can be various and potentially disabling. Among these, acute patellar dislocation can often result in recurrent patellar instability. Recurrent patellar instability is certainly multifactorial but depends primarily on the injury of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), the major soft-tissue stabilizer of the patella. Some classifications are extremely useful in establishing the diagnosis and therapy in patellofemoral disease, in particular in terms of instability. Among those, Henri Dejour and WARPS (weak atraumatic risky anatomy pain and subluxation)/STAID (strong traumatic anatomy normal instability and dislocation) classifications are certainly the most frequently used. There is no clear agreement on the management of the first patellar dislocation. A conservative approach seems to be the first choice in most of cases, but the presence of patellar displacement or osteochondral fractures makes surgery mandatory at the beginning. In addition, there is no clear consensus on which surgical strategy should be used to approach first dislocation, in relation to the possible variation in location of the MPFL injury, and to the eventual presence of preexisting predisposing factors for patellar instability. MPFL reconstruction may theoretically be more reliable than repair, while there is no clear evidence available that osseous abnormality should be addressed after the first episode of patellar dislocation. A narrative review was conducted to report the etiology, the diagnosis and all the possible treatment options of the first patellar dislocation. Modern classifications of the patellofemoral instability were also presented.

Editorial Commentary: Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Repair Versus Reconstruction: Still a Question or a Clear Winner?

Controversy persists regarding appropriate treatment of patellar instability. As surgeons move to a more aggressive approach, medial imbrication and medial patellofemoral ligament repair are waning in popularity whereas medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction has become the standard of care. Techniques vary between surgeons, and consensus remains elusive.

Primary Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Repair Versus Reconstruction: Rates and Risk Factors for Instability Recurrence in a Young, Active Patient Population

PURPOSE

To comparatively evaluate the clinical outcomes and rates of recurrent instability in young patients with primary medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) repair or reconstruction, as well as to assess for radiologic risk factors for worse outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified all patients with lateral patellar instability who underwent either MPFL repair and/or imbrication or MPFL reconstruction without any additional osseous procedures between 2008 and 2015 at a single center. Demographic variables and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging were analyzed, and Kujala scores were obtained at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Risk factors for worse outcomes were assessed, including the Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI) Insall-Salvati Index, tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance, and tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament distance.

RESULTS

We identified 51 knees with isolated MPFL surgery (reconstruction in 32 and imbrication and/or repair in 19) at a mean of 59.7 months' follow-up (range, 24-121 months). The overall rate of recurrent dislocations was significantly greater in the repair group (36.9%) versus the reconstruction group (6.3%, P = .01), despite the average CDI being significantly higher in the reconstruction group (1.34 vs 1.23 in repair group, P = .04). No significant difference in the rate of return to baseline activity was found between the groups (77.8% in reconstruction group vs 70% in repair group, P = .62). The average Kujala score showed no significant difference between the repair and reconstruction groups (84.15 ± 14.2 vs 84.83 ± 14.38, P = .72). No imaging measurements were found to be predictive of a worse postoperative Kujala score; however, the average CDI among the MPFL repair failures (1.30 ± 0.05) was significantly higher than among the MPFL repair nonfailures (1.18 ± 0.12, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

MPFL reconstruction may provide improved midterm clinical outcomes and a decreased recurrence rate compared with MPFL repair. Increased patellar height as measured by the CDI may be a risk factor for recurrent patellar instability in patients who undergo isolated MPFL repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

The Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Is a Dynamic and Anisometric Structure: An In Vivo Study on Length Changes and Isometry

BACKGROUND

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is associated with a high rate of complications, including recurrent instability and persistent knee pain. Technical errors are among the primary causes of these complications. Understanding the effect of adjusting patellofemoral attachments on length change patterns may help surgeons to optimize graft placement during MPFL reconstruction and to reduce graft failure rates.

PURPOSE

To determine the in vivo length changes of the MPFL during dynamic, weightbearing motion and to map the isometry of the 3-dimensional wrapping paths from various attachments on the medial femoral epicondyle to the patella.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Fifteen healthy participants were studied with a combined computed tomography and biplane fluoroscopic imaging technique during a lunge motion (full extension to ~110° of flexion). On the medial femoral epicondyle, 185 attachments were projected, including the anatomic MPFL footprint, which was divided into 5 attachments (central, proximal, distal, posterior, and anterior). The patellar MPFL area was divided into 3 possible attachments (proximal, central, and distal). The length changes of the shortest 3-dimensional wrapping paths of the various patellofemoral combinations were subsequently measured and mapped.

RESULTS

For the 3 patellar attachments, the most isometric attachment, with an approximate 4% length change, was located posterior and proximal to the anatomic femoral MPFL attachment, close to the adductor tubercle. Attachments proximal and anterior to the isometric area resulted in increasing lengths with increasing knee flexion, whereas distal and posterior attachments caused decreasing lengths with increasing knee flexion. The anatomic MPFL was tightest in extension, decreased in length until approximately 30° of flexion, and then stayed near isometric for the remainder of the motion. Changing both the femoral and patellar attachments significantly affected the length changes of the anatomic MPFL ( P < .001 for both).

CONCLUSION

The most isometric location for MPFL reconstruction was posterior and proximal to the anatomic femoral MPFL attachment. The anatomic MPFL is a dynamic, anisometric structure that was tight in extension and early flexion and near isometric beyond 30° of flexion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Proximal and anterior MPFL tunnel positioning should be avoided, and the importance of anatomic MPFL reconstruction is underscored with the results found in this study.

Proof-of-concept prototype drill-guide for use in medial patello-femoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction surgery

For surgical reconstruction of the medial patello-femoral ligament (MPFL) a variety of techniques are used for fixation of the graft to the medial border of the patella. The bone bridge or V-shaped tunnel technique utilises two tunnels drilled from the medial aspect of the patella that converge centrally creating a tunnel through which the graft is threaded. This technique has advantages: it avoids hardware (bone anchors) and their associated complications, creates a broad attachment of the ligament approximating normal anatomy and the tunnel does not breach the lateral cortex of the patella reducing the risk of patella fracture. In current practice the bony tunnels are created using freehand techniques. These rely on estimation of the patella centre by the surgeon and is subject to wide variation. Additionally this technique can be inefficient, inaccurate and time consuming. To address these disadvantages a new drill-guide device was developed. A prototype drill-guide was constructed using CAD and 3D printing methods. The device was designed to allow the surgeon to accurately and efficiently drill the required v-shaped bone tunnel. To assess the efficacy of the prototype drill guide, an experiment designed to assess a group of ten surgeons with an average of 4.2 years experience performing the task of creating a v-shaped bone tunnel using a free-hand technique and the drill-guide. To determine the accuracy of the tunnel placement, the angle between drill holes, distance from centre of the patella and the amount of over-drill were measured. Procedure duration was also compared. The results revealed that the prototype drill-guide created a more accurate bone bridge than the traditional free hand method. The root mean square error for the distance from centre was 0.50 mm vs 2.12 mm and the angle between tunnels was 2.6O vs 15.9O for the prototype and traditional methods respectively. There was a mean of 8.9 mm over-drill with the traditional method, which was negated when using the guide. Surgeons using the guide were approximately 25% faster than using the traditional free-hand technique. The prototype drill-guide improved the accuracy, reduced the variability, and reduced procedure duration compared to the traditional free-hand technique.

No Difference in Outcome Between Femoral Soft-Tissue and Screw Graft Fixation for Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

The aim of the present randomized controlled trial was to compare 2 different medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) techniques that utilize different femoral fixation principles, which could affect subjective clinical outcomes and surgical morbidity.

METHODS

Sixty patients were randomly assigned to 2 MPFL-R techniques: bone or soft-tissue fixation of the graft at the femoral condyle. Patients had operations performed between 2010 and 2015 at a single center. Indication for surgery was 2 or more patellar dislocations. When the bone fixation technique was used, the gracilis tendon was fixed with the use of an interference screw. When the soft-tissue fixation technique was used, the gracilis tendon was looped around the adductor magnus tendon. Both techniques used patella-graft fixation with drill holes in the medial patellar edge. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by means of Kujala, knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome, and pain scores before the operation and at 1- and 2-year follow-up examinations. Surgical morbidity was evaluated by pain on palpation along the reconstruction site.

RESULTS

Kujala scores were 88 and 89 for bone and soft-tissue fixation groups, respectively, with no difference between groups (P = .73). No significant differences in knee injury osteoarthritis outcome or pain scores were found. Analysis of surgical morbidity, defined as femoral-based tenderness overlying the fixation site, demonstrated that 13% and 12% of patients had significant tenderness at the reconstruction site after bone and soft-tissue MPFL-R, respectively. No patellar re-dislocations were observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

MPFL-R with soft-tissue graft fixation at the femoral condyles resulted in findings for subjective clinical outcome, patellar stability, and pain level similar to those associated with MPFL-R with bone fixation. Surgical morbidity was also similar between patients who had soft-tissue and those who had bone fixation MPFL-R. Soft-tissue femoral graft fixation does not result in inferior clinical outcomes compared with screw fixation, and it can be used safely for MPFL-R.

A new classification of injury patterns of the medial patellofemoral ligament after acute lateral patella dislocation detected using magnetic resonance imaging studies

INTRODUCTION

Acute lateral patellar dislocation is a very common condition in orthopedics, especially among adolescents and physically active patients. To evaluate distinct medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) injury patterns and the associated knee pathology after acute lateral patellar dislocation (ALPD) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, which is essential for the development of treatment protocols.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MRI images of 74 ALPD patients were taken between January 2015 to December 2016. Images were evaluated using standardized protocols.

RESULTS

The prevalence of MPFL injury following ALPD was 97.3% (72/74 patients). Among the 72 patients with MPFL, the prevalence of Type Ⅰ injury was 26.4% (19/72). Since only bone marrow edema and a partial tear were showed on MRI of these patients, conservative treatment was given. Tear of the MPFL occurred at the patellar attachment (Type Ⅱa) in 16 patients (16/72, 22.2%), at the middle area of the ligament (Type Ⅱb) in 5 patients (5/72, 6.9%), and at the femoral attachment (Type Ⅱc) in 27 patients (27/72, 37.5%). For Type Ⅱ injuries, all patients had the surgery to reconstruct the MPFL. The prevalence of Type Ⅲ MPFL injury was 6.9% (5/72) after the surgery.

CONCLUSION

MPFL injury of is a common sequel following ALPD. We assessed the distinct injury pattern and associated pathology of MPFL using MRI studies. A good understanding of the injury pattern and associated knee pathology of MPFL is essential in managing patients with ALPD, especially if surgical intervention is considered.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Repair With Suture Tape Augmentation

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the main restraining force in the first 20° of flexion against lateral patellar displacement and is disrupted after patellar subluxation or dislocation. MPFL reconstruction is frequently performed when conservative management fails and the patient has recurrent patellar dislocations. However, a variety of complications have been reported in the literature with this procedure. Internal bracing with suture tape augmentation encourages healing and allows early mobilization. This article describes, with video illustration, MPFL repair with suture tape augmentation.

Patellar Instability Management: A Survey of the International Patellofemoral Study Group

BACKGROUND

Although patellofemoral instability is among the most prevalent knee disorders, the management of patients with this condition is complex and remains variable, given the lack of long-term, high-level clinical outcome studies to compare various operative and nonoperative modalities.

PURPOSE

To discover a consensus within treatment controversies in patellofemoral instability among experienced knee surgeons with a specific interest in the patellofemoral joint.

STUDY DESIGN

Expert opinion; Level of evidence, 5.

METHODS

A 3-step modified Delphi technique was used to establish a consensus. A 34-question, case-based online survey regarding patellofemoral instability was distributed to all active members of the International Patellofemoral Study Group. Consensus statements were generated if at least 66% of the respondents agreed and then redistributed to the same panel. Modifications to the consensus statements were made based on the iterative feedback process until no discordance was encountered in the third stage.

RESULTS

Eight consensus statements were achieved. Nonoperative management is the current standard of care for a first-time dislocation in the absence of an osteochondral fragment or loose body requiring excision (100% agreement). In patients with a first-time dislocation with an operative osteochondral fracture requiring excision or repair, patellar instability should be addressed concurrently (89% agreement). Recurrent instability should be treated surgically, with most surgeons favoring medial reconstruction (77%-86% agreement). While there is general agreement that bony procedures should be performed to correct underlying bony deformities, there is no consensus regarding the most appropriate type of procedure performed. Lateral release should not be performed in isolation for the treatment of patellar instability (89% agreement).

CONCLUSION

Despite the consensus generated in this study, our current understanding remains limited by a lack of high-level evidence as well as the numerous complex variables influencing treatment decision making. High-quality, multicenter randomized controlled trials, particularly those directly comparing specific surgical treatment methods while controlling for underlying risk factors, are needed to address these areas of uncertainty.

Does patella alta lead to worse clinical outcome in patients who undergo isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction? A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this systematic review is to determine the effect of patella height on clinical outcomes after isolated MPFL reconstruction for patella instability. Our primary hypothesis is that patients with patella alta report similar outcomes after isolated MPFL reconstruction compared to patients with normal patella height.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to January 10th 2018. Studies were identified using synonyms for "medial patellofemoral ligament", "reconstruction" and "patella alta".

RESULTS

The search resulted in 467 reports on PubMed, 175 on EMBASE and 3 on the Cochrane Library. We included and analyzed in detail six studies describing outcomes after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with regard to patellar height. We found that both patients with patella alta and normal patella height reported satisfactory outcomes after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. However, because of applied exclusion criteria in the included studies the total number of patients with severe patella alta was small (13/74 patients with patella alta, 18%).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current literature we suggest that additional tibial tubercle distalisation is not mandatory in patients with mild patella alta (Caton-Deschamps Index 1.2-1.4). To assess the best indications for different surgical procedures for patients with patella instability future research is needed to develop a clear and uniform definition of relevant patella alta.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Effective patellofemoral joint stabilization and low complication rates using a hardware-free MPFL reconstruction technique with an intra-operative adjustment of the graft tension

PURPOSE

Even if medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is a proven method, complications such as implant loosening, patella fractures, recurrent luxations, knee pain or knee stiffness are frequently described. Besides a correct tunnel positioning and implant-specific complications, this might be caused by difficulties with an appropriate graft tensioning. The study presented here is a necessary first step in exploring our technique of a double-limbed, hardware-free MPFL reconstruction, which provides another way to test and adjust the graft tension before permanent fastening.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients (m/f = 18/12) with recurrent dislocations were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 24 months. Patients who had additional procedures such as a trochleoplasties, tibial tubercle transfers and derotational osteotomies were not included. Besides a standardized clinical examination, different scorings and possible complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean Kujala score improved significantly from 57 ± 15 to 92 ± 10. The Lysholm and IKDC score increased significantly from 59 ± 11 to 95 ± 6 and from 49 ± 9 to 89 ± 9, respectively. No patient reported a re-dislocation, subluxation or showed a positive apprehension. A total of 23 patients were engaged in regular physical activities. All but one, who lost interest, returned to the same sports. Because some did not follow our recommendation to return to sports after a rehab of at least 10-12 weeks, the period for a return was relatively short (median of 12 weeks, range 3-25 weeks). Four patients reported a moderate anterior knee pain only occurring after increased loads such as longer runs or workouts. One of these showed a slight flexion deficit of less than 20°. A severe motion deficit or stiffness was not noticed.

CONCLUSIONS

Even if a larger, clinical outcome study is needed to ensure the efficacy and safety of our method, it seems to provide a good clinical outcome, a correspondingly high satisfaction and a low incidence of complications. The possibility to adjust graft tension might help in minimizing complications caused by difficulties with an appropriate graft tension.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Modern synthetic material is a safe and effective alternative for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is often performed using gracilis autografts, which may be associated with donor site morbidity and complications. The use of a synthetic material can circumvent a harvest operation and has previously been demonstrated to be effective in other types of reconstructive procedures and may be effective in MPFL reconstruction. This study reports the clinical result with the use of a modern ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene with a braided jacket of polyester tape (FT) in MPFL reconstruction compared to using standard autografts.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively in 50 MPFL reconstructions. The first 27 underwent reconstruction using gracilis tendon (GT) autograft; the following 23 patients were treated with FT. All patients were clinically and radiologically assessed and underwent pre- and post-operative scoring using the Kujala score, Bartlett score, Tegner activity rating scale, SF-12 score and Lysholm score. Statistical significance was tested between groups using ANOVA with repeated measures.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the pre-operative scores between the FT and GT groups (n.s.). Both groups showed significant improvements across all scoring modalities between pre- and post-operative periods 12, 24 and 48 months of follow-up (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in knee function scores between the GT and FT groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of FiberTape in MPFL reconstruction is safe and effective, and it significantly improves patient's quality of life and related post-operative outcome measures. There were no significant differences in all knee scores compared to GT autografts. Using this technique for MPFL reconstruction, tendon harvesting is unnecessary and hence eliminates donor site morbidity-associated complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Return-to-Play Guidelines After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Surgery for Recurrent Patellar Instability: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and repair continue to gain acceptance as viable treatment options for recurrent patellar instability in patients who wish to return to sports after surgery. Return-to-play guidelines with objective or subjective criteria for athletes after MPFL surgery, however, have not been uniformly defined.

PURPOSE

To determine whether a concise and objective protocol exists that may help athletes return to their sport more safely after MPFL surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

The clinical evidence for return to play after MPFL reconstruction was evaluated through a systematic review of the literature. Studies that measured outcomes for isolated MPFL surgery with greater than a 12-month follow-up were included in our study. We analyzed each study for a return-to-play timeline, rehabilitation protocol, and any measurements used to determine a safe return to play after surgery.

RESULTS

Fifty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 1756 patients and 1838 knees. The most commonly cited rehabilitation guidelines included weightbearing restrictions and range of motion restrictions in 90.6% and 84.9% of studies, respectively. Thirty-five of 53 studies (66.0%) included an expected timeline for either return to play or return to full activity. Ten of 53 studies (18.9%) in our analysis included either objective or subjective criteria to determine return to activity within their rehabilitation protocol.

CONCLUSION

Most studies in our analysis utilized time-based criteria for determining return to play after MPFL surgery, while only a minority utilized objective or subjective patient-centric criteria. Further investigation is needed to determine safe and effective guidelines for return to play after MPFL reconstruction and repair.

Medial patellofemoral ligament repair restores stability in pediatric patients when compared to reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Pediatric patellar instability has a high recurrence rate with non-operative care, and medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has known complications. MPFL repair offers an alternative method to restore patellar stability. This study's purpose was to assess the outcomes of MPFL repair in a pediatric cohort, and to compare these outcomes to a cohort of pediatric patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction.

METHODS

One surgeon performed 16 MPFL repairs on pediatric patients for traumatic patellar instability, with an average follow-up of 1.5 years. Age, sex, skeletal maturity, trochlear dysplasia, additional procedures, final range of motion, and complications were recorded. A sub-cohort with >1 dislocation (10 patients) was compared to a historical group (22 patients) with >1 dislocation who underwent allograft MPFL reconstructions by the same surgeon.

RESULTS

Ten out of 16 (63%) patients had >1 dislocation event at time of presentation. Thirteen out of 16 (81%) patients had trochlear dysplasia. There were no complications and no recurrent instability in the repair group at last follow-up. Patients in the reconstruction group were older than the repair group (15.6 years vs. 13.0 years, p < 0.05), had lower Caton-Deschamps ratio (1.2 vs. 1.4, p < 0.05), and had lower percentage of additional procedures (59% vs. 100%, p < 0.05). There were three complications in the reconstruction group: two patients with recurrent instability and one patient with patella fracture requiring revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

MPFL repair in pediatric patients resulted in a low risk of recurrent instability with rates comparable or better than that of allograft reconstruction.

Avoiding Complications with MPFL Reconstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the potentially significant complications associated with medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. Additionally, to review the most current and relevant literature with an emphasis on avoiding these potential complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple cadaveric studies have characterized the anatomy of the MPFL and the related morphologic abnormalities that contribute to recurrent lateral patellar instability. Such abnormalities include patella alta, excessive tibial tubercle to trochlear grove (TT-TG) distance, trochlear dysplasia, and malalignment. Recent studies have evaluated the clinical outcomes associated with the treatment of concomitant pathology in combination with MPFL reconstruction, which is critical in avoiding recurrent instability and complications. Although there remains a lack of consensus regarding various critical aspects of MPFL reconstruction, certain concepts remain imperative. Our preferred methods and rationales for surgical techniques are described. These include appropriate work up, a combination of procedures to address abnormal morphology, anatomical femoral insertion, safe and secure patellar fixation, appropriate graft length fixation, and thoughtful knee flexion during fixation.

MPFL in First-Time Dislocators

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Historically, the standard of care for patients with an acute patella dislocation has been non-operative with the exception being those with a loose body or osteochondral fracture requiring fixation or removal.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent literature has brought into question this standard of care approach and defined a higher risk subset of first-time dislocators who may benefit from early operative treatment. In addition, these studies suggest that operative treatment not only reduces the risk of recurrence but may improve outcomes overall and specifically in the pediatric population. Though the "high risk" population of first-time dislocators has been more clearly defined, how we treat them remains controversial. We continue to need more evidence-based guidelines to help us manage who we should be fixing and how we should be fixing them. We currently have several multi-center studies in progress, including one specifically looking at the question of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in first-time pediatric and adolescent dislocators.

Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE

Critically evaluate the published literature related to quadriceps tendon (QT) medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hamstring tendon (HT) MPFL reconstruction techniques have been shown to successfully restore patella stability, but complications including patella fracture are reported. Quadriceps tendon (QT) reconstruction techniques with an intact graft pedicle on the patella side have the advantage that patella bone tunnel drilling and fixation are no longer needed, reducing risk of patella fracture. Several QT MPFL reconstruction techniques, including minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approaches, have been published with promising clinical results and fewer complications than with HT techniques. Parallel laboratory studies have shown macroscopic anatomy and biomechanical properties of QT are more similar to native MPFL than hamstring (HS) HT, suggesting QT may more accurately restore native joint kinematics. Quadriceps tendon MPFL reconstruction, via both open and MIS techniques, have promising clinical results and offer valuable alternatives to HS grafts for primary and revision MPFL reconstruction in both children and adults.

Graft Choice in Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Rates of Recurrent Instability and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Autograft, Allograft, and Synthetic Options

PURPOSE

To determine whether graft selection or patient age affects the following after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction: (1) rates of recurrent instability, (2) rates of postoperative complications (other than instability), and (3) subjective symptom improvement.

METHODS

A systematic search identified studies reporting outcomes for isolated MPFL reconstruction. Rates of recurrent instability, subjective Kujala knee function scores, and complications were tabulated. Symptom improvement was defined as change in Kujala score (preoperative evaluation to final follow-up).

RESULTS

Forty-five studies were included with 27 documented cases of recurrent instability among 1,504 patients (1.8%); instability rates ranged from 0% to 20.0% overall; among autograft in adults, 0% to 11.1% (1.4%, 18/1,260); among autograft in adolescents, 0% to 20% (10.0%, 8/80); among allograft, 0% (0/65 cases); and among synthetic, 0% to 3.3% (1.3%, 1/76). Among autograft choices in adults, rates of recurrent instability were low; recurrence with gracilis ranged from 0% to 11.1% (0.9%, 1/116); with semitendinosus, 0% to 6.3% (0.6%, 4/676); with quad or patellar tendon, 0% (0/65); and with adductor tendon, 5.6% to 8.3% (6.7%, 2/30). Complication rates ranged from 0% to 34.4%. All included studies reported significant improvement in Kujala scores after surgery (P < .01). There was significant heterogeneity in effect size and evidence of reporting bias among small studies, precluding reliable pooled analysis of treatment effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Autograft is not superior to allograft or synthetic grafts for isolated reconstruction of the MPFL, and rates of recurrent instability are generally low. Isolated MPFL reconstruction can provide significant symptom relief regardless of graft selection, although there is a bias toward reporting better than expected results among smaller studies. Pediatric patients and patients treated with adductor tendon autograft have higher recurrent instability rates. While caution should be used in making definitive recommendations secondary to the small number of allograft and synthetic studies, selection of graft type based on surgeon preference, comfort, and prior experience remains appropriate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction with Semitendinosus Tendon Allograft

Background

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is recommended to surgically stabilize the patella against excessive lateral patellar translation. It is currently the cornerstone of treatment for recurrent lateral patellar instability. The MPFL is often disrupted during acute patellar dislocations but may also be attenuated in the setting of recurrent lateral instability. Numerous techniques have been developed with the primary goal of restoring the static function of the MPFL in resisting lateral translation of the patella during early flexion of the knee. There are now numerous options for the surgical technique, fixation devices, and graft choice, with equal clinical results as long as key surgical principles are maintained¹. This article provides a step-by-step description of our preferred technique as well as offering technical pearls and a review of patient outcomes.

Description

The MPFL is reconstructed anatomically using a hamstring allograft or autograft with an ideal width of 4 to 5 mm. The graft is secured to the femur with an interference screw at its anatomic insertion point, which can be defined by radiographic or anatomic landmarks, is passed through the soft tissues between the capsule and the medial retinaculum/vastus medialis oblique muscles, and is secured to the superomedial patellar border.

Alternatives

Nonoperative treatment of lateral patellar dislocations is associated with recurrent dislocation rates of 35% to 50%; surgical treatment for recurrent dislocations has afforded improved patient outcomes^2,3. In general, there are 3 surgical options to restore the function of the MPFL. Historically, acute repair was thought to offer the MFPL a chance to "heal" and resume its function; however, the literature has failed to support this as a reliable option in the setting of lateral patellar instability⁴. Similarly, delayed tightening or imbrication of the MPFL in the setting of chronic laxity has not demonstrated worthwhile clinical results⁵. MPFL reconstruction with a graft, as described here, has provided the most consistent outcomes.

Rationale

Isolated reconstruction of the MPFL is indicated for patients with a history consistent with recurrent lateral patellar instability and a physical examination demonstrating excessive lateral patellar translation. Patients with high-grade trochlear dysplasia and patella alta may be better treated with concomitant osseous procedures such as trochleoplasty or tibial tubercle osteotomy.