Intra- and post-operative accuracy assessments of two different patient-specific instrumentation systems for total knee replacement

No differences in mid-term survival and clinical outcome between CT- and MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty, a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to compare the clinical outcome and the survival rate of total knee arthroplasty between CT- and MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation 5 years after initial surgery.

METHODS

At a mean follow-up of 5.8 years (SD 0.3), 98 patients (64% women, loss to follow-up 28%) were included in this analysis. To assess the differences in clinical outcome, patients fulfilled PROMs preoperatively and at each follow-up moment. At final follow-up, the Forgotten Joint Score was adjusted.

RESULTS

At final follow-up, no new patients underwent revision surgery in both groups. Regarding the clinical outcome, no statistically significant difference between the groups was found. The Forgotten Joint Score was only performed at final follow-up and showed no significant difference between both groups.

CONCLUSION

At mid-term follow-up, survival rates between CT- and MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation did not show a significant difference. Regarding clinical outcome, only the EQ-5D-VAS (p < 0.040) showed a statistically significant difference over time, in favor of the MRI-group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Accuracy of Patient-Specific Instrument for Cylindrical Axis Implementation in Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

In kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA), the cylindrical axis (CA) is very important in restoring the native joint line and kinematics of the pre-arthritic knee. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of patient-specific instrument (PSI) for restoring the CA for femoral bone resection in KA-TKA.

Methods

Thirty KA-TKAs were performed using a computed tomography (CT)-based PSI system. Data from preoperative CT were reconstructed into three-dimensional (3D) models using 3D-planning software. The CA was created by connecting the centers of each virtual sphere to the medial and lateral femoral condyles using computer software. Femoral bone resection of the distal and posterior condyles was performed parallel to the sagittal planes of the CA. The thickness of the CA-referenced bone resection was determined based on the thickness necessary for the respective regions of the femoral component. The PSI was manufactured to locate the guide pin for a conventional cutting block. The accuracy of PSI for KA-TKA was evaluated as the absolute error between the preoperatively predicted thickness and the intraoperative measurements in each of the four regions, as well as the difference in error between distal-medial (DM) and posterior-medial (PM) and between distal-lateral (DL) and posterior-lateral (PL).

Results

The differences in thickness of bone cut in the DM, DL, PM, and PL were 0.79 ± 0.39 mm (range, -1.20 to 1.50), 0.70 ± 0.42 mm (range, -1.50 to 1.50), 0.80 ± 0.46 mm (range, -0.80 to 1.50), and 0.75 ± 0.47 mm (range, -2.10 to 1.40), respectively. There was no significant difference in the thickness error between DM and PM (p = 0.959) and between DL and PL (p = 0.812).

Conclusions

In KA-TKA, PSI was effective for accurate femoral bone resection based on virtually planned thickness.

Closed-leg standing long leg radiographs can be a useful tool to assess whether the joint line is parallel to the ground in restricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) is a modified technique of kinematic alignment (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for patients with an outlier or atypical knee anatomy, striving to preserve the native knee joint line parallel to the ground in a bipedal stance. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of rKA TKA with a computed tomography (CT)-based patient-specific instrument (PSI) to achieve the preoperative plan with the joint line parallel to the ground level.

METHODS

Using a CT-based PSI, 74 closed-leg standing long-leg radiographs were obtained before and after rKA TKA. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), joint line orientation angle (JLOA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured. Bone resection accuracy was evaluated by postoperative HKA deviations from the planned alignment and joint line by postoperative JLOA deviations from the ground level.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative JLOA and HKA were 2.1° valgus (range, standard deviation: 6.0° valgus to 3.0° varus, 2.0) and 2.6° varus (3.5° valgus to 12.5° varus, 3.2), respectively. Postoperative JLOA and HKA were within ± 3° of the planned alignment for 69% and 86% of cases, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a static verification, we clarified how the joint line after rKA TKA was reproduced in the closed-leg long leg radiographs to mimic the limb position during gait. However, this imaging method is not well-established, and lack of long-term survivorship and the relationship between joint line inclination and clinical outcomes represented limitations of this study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Evaluation of the accuracy of resected bone thickness based on patient-specific instrumentation during total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), the correlation between the preoperative surgical plan and intraoperative resection size is unclear. The aims of this study were to evaluate whether the computed tomography (CT)-based PSI surgical plan can be executed accurately and to determine the accuracy of bone resection in TKA using PSI.

METHODS

Data of 45 consecutive knees undergoing TKA using CT-based PSI were retrospectively evaluated. The preoperative plan was prepared using three-dimensional CT acquisitions of the hip, knee, and ankle joints. Resected bone thicknesses of the femoral condyle of the distal medial, distal lateral, posterior medial, posterior lateral, and medial and lateral tibial plateaus were measured with a Vernier caliper intraoperatively. Then these respective measurements were compared with those in the preoperative CT-predicted bone resection surgical plan, and the measured thickness of resection was subtracted from the planned resection thickness. Errors were defined as: acceptable, ≤ 1.5 mm; borderline, 1.5-2.5 mm; and outliers,  > 2.5 mm.

RESULTS

Overall, 22 (48.9%) knees had no outliers. There were 20 (44.4%) and 3 (6.7%) knees in which only 1 and 2 resection planes were outliers, respectively. The posterior medial tibial plateau had the lowest proportion of acceptable cuts (44.4%). Posterior femoral resection including the medial and lateral condyles had more outliers (n = 18/90 cuts, 20.0%) (p < 0.001) than the tibial condyles (n = 3/90 cuts, 3.3%) and distal femoral cuts (n = 6/90 cuts, 6.7%). The posterior surface of the femur, where the incidence of outliers was higher, tended to have a higher proportion of undercuts than other surfaces of the femur (> 80%).

CONCLUSIONS

PSI showed only fair-to-moderate accuracy. The cutting guide for the posterior femur was less accurate than that for the tibia and distal femur. Specific attention is required when cutting the posterior femur. The PSI design needs to be improved to reduce errors.

Multimodality-based knee joint modelling method with bone and cartilage structures for total knee arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

We propose a robust and accurate knee joint modelling method with bone and cartilage structures to enable accurate surgical guidance for knee surgery.

METHODS

A multimodality registration strategy is proposed to fuse magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) images of the femur and tibia separately to remove spatial inconsistency caused by knee bending in CT/MR scans. Automatic segmentation of the femur, tibia and cartilages is carried out with region of interest clustering and intensity analysis based on the multimodal fusion of images.

RESULTS

Experimental results show that the registration error is 1.13 ± 0.30 mm. The Dice similarity coefficient values of the proposed segmentation method of the femur, tibia, femoral and tibial cartilages are 0.969, 0.966, 0.910 and 0.872, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of multimodality-based registration and segmentation methods for knee joint modelling. The proposed method can provide users with 3D anatomical models of the femur, tibia, and cartilages with few human inputs.

[Clinical application of distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide based on knee CT and full-length X-ray film of lower extremities]

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the feasibility and accuracy of distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) based on knee CT and full-length X-ray film of lower extremities.

METHODS

Between July 2016 and February 2017, 20 patients with severe knee joint osteoarthritis planned to undergo primary TKA were selected as the research object. There were 9 males and 11 females; aged 53-84 years, with an average of 69.4 years. The body mass index was 22.1-31.0 kg/m 2, with an average of 24.8 kg/m 2. The preoperative range of motion (ROM) of the knee joint was (103.0±19.4)°, the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 5.4±1.3, and the American Hospital of Special Surgery (HSS) score was 58.1±11.3. Before operation, a three-dimensional model of the knee joint was constructed based on the full-length X-ray film of lower extremities and CT of the knee joint. The distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide was designed and fabricated, and the thickness of the distal femoral osteotomy was determined by digital simulation. The thickness of the internal and external condyle of the distal femur osteotomy before operation and the actual thickness of the intraoperative osteotomy were compared. The intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage loss, and hidden blood loss were recorded. The ROM of knee joint, VAS score, and HSS score at 3 months after operation were recorded to evaluate effectiveness. The position of the coronal and sagittal plane of the distal femoral prosthesis were assessed by comparing the femoral mechanical-anatomical angle (FMAA), anatomical lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA), mechanical femoral tibial angle (mFTA), distal femoral flexion angle (DFFA), femoral prosthesis flexion angle (FPFA), anatomical lateral femoral component angle (aLFC), and the angle of the femoral component and femoral shaft (α angle) between pre- and post-operation.

RESULTS

TKA was successfully completed with the aid of the distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide. There was no significant difference between the thickness of the internal and lateral condyle of the distal femur osteotomy before operation and the actual thickness of the intraoperative osteotomy ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up 3 months. All incisions healed by first intention, and there was no complications such as periarticular infection and deep vein thrombosis. Except for 1 patient who was not treated with tranexamic acid, the intraoperative blood loss of the rest 19 patients ranged from 30 to 150 mL, with an average of 73.2 mL; the postoperative drainage loss ranged from 20 to 500 mL, with an average of 154.5 mL; and the hidden blood loss ranged from 169.2 to 1 400.0 mL, with an average of 643.8 mL. At 3 months after operation, the ROM of the knee was (111.5±11.5)°, and there was no significant difference when compared with the preoperative one ( t=-1.962, P=0.065). The VAS score was 2.4±0.9 and HSS score was 88.2±7.5, showing significant differences when compared with the preoperative ones ( t=7.248, P=0.000; t=-11.442, P=0.000). Compared with the preoperative measurements, there was a significant difference in mFTA ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in aLDFA, FMAA, or DFFA; compared with the preoperative plan, there was no significant difference in FPFA, aLFC, or α angle ( P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The use of distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide based on knee CT and full-length X-ray film of lower extremity can achieve precise osteotomy, improve coronal and sagittal limb alignment, reduce intraoperative blood loss, and obtain satisfactory short-term effectiveness.

Fewer femoral rotational outliers produced with CT- than with MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Previous studies comparing the surgical accuracy between computed tomography (CT)- and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) methods have produced contradictory results. The aim of this study was to determine which is the more reliable imaging method (CT versus MRI) for patient-specific total knee arthroplasty (TKA). CT-based PSI is hypothesised to have an advantage regarding the number of outliers.

METHODS

A total of 22 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including 1749 TKA cases, were eligible for the meta-analysis. RCTs, systematic reviews and meta-analyses on this topic published in databases before September 2018 were identified by a literature search. The primary outcome was the number of lower extremities with greater than 3° of difference in alignment angles between the postoperative outcomes and target outcomes. The parameters calculated from the meta-analysis included risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Additionally, the publication bias and heterogeneity of the studies were assessed.

RESULTS

The risk of femoral rotational outliers in the PSI group (RR = 0.48; 95% CI 0.24-0.98) was significantly reduced. Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed that the accuracy in the CT-based PSI group was significantly higher than that in the MRI-based CSI group (RR = 0.31; 95% CI 0.10-0.92).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis shows that when performing TKA with PSI, preoperative CT is beneficial for the production of the PSI, resulting in a significantly lower proportion of outliers in femoral rotational alignment. CT should be the preferred choice for imaging when performing TKA surgery with PSI to obtain better femoral rotational alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study (systematic review and meta-analysis), Level I.

Patient-specific instrumentation improves functional kinematics of minimally-invasive total knee replacements as revealed by computerized 3D fluoroscopy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Minimally-invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS-TKA) has demonstrated very good short-term success, but its mid- to long-term results remain inconclusive. The success may be related to the tradeoff between a small incision and accurate positioning of the implant components. Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) aims to improve the accuracy in restoring the knee axis and the clinical outcomes for MIS-TKA, but the results are yet to be confirmed by accurate assessment during functional activities. The purpose of the current study was to measure and compare the in vivo three-dimensional (3D) rigid-body and surface kinematics of MIS-TKA implanted with and without PSI during isolated knee active flexion/extension and sit-to-stand using state-of-the-art 3D model-based fluoroscopy technology.

METHODS

Ten patients treated for advanced medial knee osteoarthritis by MIS-TKA without PSI (non-PSI group) and nine with PSI (PSI group) participated in the current study. Each subject performed non-weight-bearing knee flexion/extension and sit-to-stand tasks while the motion of the prosthetic knee was under bi-plane fluoroscopy surveillance. The computer models of each of the knee prosthesis components were registered to the measured fluoroscopy images for each time frame via a novel validated 3D fluoroscopy method. Non-parametric 1-tailed Mann-Whitney tests were performed to detect the differences in the joint and surface kinematic variables every 10° of knee flexion between the non-PSI and PSI groups. The 1-tailed significance level was at α = 0.05.

RESULTS

The PSI group showed clear, coupled flexion/internal rotation during activities, while the non-PSI group remained roughly at an externally rotated position with slight internal rotations. The coupled rotation in the PSI group was accompanied by an anterior displacement of the medial contact and a posterior displacement of the lateral contact, which was different from the screw-home mechanism. Neither of the two groups showed the normal roll-back phenomenon, i.e., posterior translation of the femur relative to the tibia during knee flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

With the state-of-the-art 3D fluoroscopy method, differences in both the rigid-body and surface kinematics of the prosthetic knees between MIS-TKA with and without PSI were identified. Patients with PSI demonstrated significant positive effects on the reconstructed rigid-body kinematics of the knee, showing clearer coupled flexion/internal rotations - an important kinematic characteristic in healthy knees - than those without PSI during activities with or without weight-bearing. However, none of them showed normal contact patterns. The current findings will be helpful for surgical instrument design, as well as for surgical decision-making in MIS total knee arthroplasty.

Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Instrument

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a new alignment technique. Kinematic alignment corrects arthritic deformity to the patient's constitutional alignment in order to position the femoral and tibial components, as well as to restore the knee's natural tibial-femoral articular surface, alignment, and natural laxity. Kinematic knee motion moves around a single flexion-extension axis of the distal femur, passing through the center of cylindrically shaped posterior femoral condyles. Since it can be difficult to locate cylindrical axis with conventional instrument, patient-specific instrument (PSI) is used to align the kinematic axes. PSI was recently introduced as a new technology with the goal of improving the accuracy of operative technique, avoiding practical issues related to the complexity of navigation and robotic system, such as the costs and higher number of personnel required. There are several limitations to implement the kinematically aligned TKA with the implant for mechanical alignment. Therefore, it is important to design an implant with the optimal shape for restoring natural knee kinematics that might improve patient-reported satisfaction and function.

Does navigated patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty result in proper bone cut, motion and clinical outcomes?

BACKGROUND

In total knee arthroplasty with patellar resurfacing, patellar bone preparation, component positioning and motion assessments are still not navigated. Only femoral/tibial component positioning is supported by computer-assistance. The aim of this study was to verify, in-vivo, whether knee surgical navigation extended to patellar resurfacing, by original instrumentation and procedures for patellar-based tracking, could achieve accurate patella preparation in terms of original thickness restoration, bone cut orientation, and normal knee motion.

METHODS

An additional navigation system for patellar data acquisition was used together with a standard navigation system for total knee arthroplasty in 20 patients. This supported the surgeon for patellar resurfacing via measurement of removed bone thickness, three-dimensional patellar cut orientations, and patello-femoral motion. Radiological and clinical examinations at 6 and 24-month follow-up were also performed.

FINDINGS

The medio-lateral patellar-bone cut orientation was respectively 0.5° (standard deviation: 3.0°) and 1.4° (1.7°) lateral tilt, as measured via navigation and post-operatively on the Merchant x-ray view. The cranio-caudal orientation was 3.8° (7.2°) of flexion. The thickness variation between patellar pre- and post-implantation was 0.2 (1.3) mm. Immediately after implantation, patello-femoral as well as tibio-femoral kinematics was within the normality. Good radiological and clinical examinations at 6 and 24-month follow-up were also observed.

INTERPRETATION

For the first time, the effect of patellar navigation for its resurfacing was assessed in-vivo during surgery, with very good results for thickness restoration, proper cut orientation, and normal knee motion. These results support the introduction of patella-related navigation-based surgical procedures for computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most commonly performed orthopedic procedures. During the past decade, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been commercially introduced in order to simplify and make TKA surgery more effective, precise and efficient than conventional mechanical instrumentation (CI) and computer-assisted surgery (CAS). Nevertheless, there are critical arguments against PSI for routine use. The aim of the current manuscript is to describe advantages and limitations of PSI for primary TKA.

AREAS COVERED

By means of a description of the available literature different aspects are discussed (accuracy, clinical and functional outcomes, operative time, blood loss, efficiency and costs).

EXPERT OPINION

Most publications do not claim a significant increase in PSI accuracy over CI, but they also do not postulate PSIs accuracy is worse either. Regarding clinical aspects, PSI did not appear to give any advantage over standard techniques although, equally, it did not appear to show any disadvantages. PSI seems to reduce operative time, could reduce perioperative blood loss and provides logistical benefits in the operation room. Further studies will be required to more thoroughly assess all the advantages and disadvantages of this promising technology as an alternative to CI and CAS.

New comprehensive procedure for custom-made total ankle replacements: Medical imaging, joint modeling, prosthesis design, and 3D printing

Many failures in total joint replacement are associated to prosthesis-to-bone mismatch. With recent additive-manufacturing, that is, 3D-printing, custom-made prosthesis can be created by laser-melting metal powders layer-by-layer. Ankle replacement is particularly suitable for this progress because of the limited number of sizes and the poor bone stock. In this study a novel procedure is presented for subject-specific ankle replacements, including medical-imaging, joint modelling, prosthesis design, and 3D-printing. Three shank-foot specimens were CT-scanned, and corresponding 3D bone models of the tibia, fibula, talus, and calcaneus were obtained. From these models, specimen-specific implant sets were designed according to three different concepts, and 3D-printed from cobalt-chromium-molybdenum powder. Accuracy of the overall procedure was assessed via distance map comparisons between original anatomical and final metal implants. Restoration of natural ankle joint mechanics was check after implantation of each of the three sets. In a special rig, a manually-driven dorsi/plantar-flexion was applied throughout the passive arc. Additionally, at three different joint positions, joint torques were imposed in the frontal and axial anatomical planes. Mean manufacturing errors were found to be smaller than 0.08 mm. Consistent motion patterns were observed over repetitions, with the mean standard deviation smaller than 1.0 degree. In each ankle specimen, mobility, and stability at the replaced joints compared well with the original natural condition. For the first time, custom-made implants for total ankle replacements were designed, manufactured with additive technology and tested. This procedure is a first fundamental step toward the development of completely personalized prostheses. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res.

The Accuracy of Alignment Determined by Patient-Specific Instrumentation System in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Purpose

The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of alignment determined by patient-specific instrumentation system in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Materials and Methods

Twenty-seven TKAs using patient-specific instrument were reviewed. The intraoperative pin location determined by the patient-specific guide was recorded using imageless navigation software. Data recorded included tibial coronal alignment and posterior slope, femoral coronal alignment and sagittal alignment, and transepicondylar axis. A discrepancy within ±3° in each plane was considered an acceptable result.

Results

On the tibia, an acceptable alignment was obtained in 24 (88.1%) in the coronal plane and 21 (77.8%) in the sagittal plane. On the femur, a satisfactory alignment was obtained in 25 (92.6%) in the coronal plane and 24 (88.1%) in the sagittal plane. Based on the transepicondylar axis, a satisfactory alignment was obtained in 23 (85.1%).

Conclusions

Satisfactory alignment was obtained in more than 85% of each plane of the femur and in the coronal plane of the tibia and relative to the transepicondylar axis. Sufficeint experience and precise preoperative planning are required to improve the accuracy of sagittal alignment of the tibia.

Comparison of knee joint orientation in clinically versus biomechanically aligned computed tomography coordinate system

Background

Preoperative planning of total knee arthroplasty is usually performed using knee-centred computed tomography (CT) data sets. The disadvantage of these data sets is having no account of the biomechanical axis of the lower extremity, known as Mikulicz line. It aligns the femoral head to the middle of the talocrural joint. For optimal prosthesis arrangement, the knee CT data set must therefore be brought in congruency with this line of loading to achieve the best results and eliminate rotational malalignments.

This study aims to establish a relation between the knee-centred clinical coordinate system (CCS) and a biomechanical coordinate system (BCS) based on the Mikulicz line.

Methods

CT data sets of 45 lower extremities were evaluated. Using VG Studio Max, a visualisation and measurement software program; each CT data set was aligned according to the CCS and BCS. After superimposing both the aligned data sets, the deviations of both coordinate systems in all three planes were measured with the centre of the knee defined as the origin.

Results

For the coronal plane, the CCS was demonstrated to be 2.54° in adduction compared to the BCS [standard deviation (SD) = 1.8°]. In sagittal view, the CCS was demonstrated to be 0.3° retroversed (SD = 3.27°). Finally, the deviation in the axial plane showed an outward rotation of 3.39° (SD = 1.99°). The alignment as well as the measurements demonstrated high intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility.

Conclusion

Both coordinate systems can be established in knee-centred CT data sets in a reproducible manner. Clearly, the CCS differs significantly from the BCS describing the biomechanical axis, but mathematical-based adaptations and corrections can be performed.

The translational potential of this article

The findings of this study allow a mathematical conversion of a knee CT to the biomechanical axis of the leg.

Favourable alignment outcomes with MRI-based patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Patient-specific instruments (PSIs) are already in relatively common use, and their post-operative radiographic results are equal to those for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with conventional instrumentation. PSI use requires a preoperative MRI scan, CT scan, or a combination of MRI and a long-leg standing radiograph. However, there is no consensus as to which of these modalities, MRI or CT, is the preferred imaging modality when performing TKA with PSIs.

METHODS

This systematic literature review and meta-analysis studied the differences in alignment outliers between CT- and MRI-based PSI for TKA. A search of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE/PubMed and Embase was conducted, without restriction on date of publication. Only level I evidence studies written in English that included TKA with the use of MRI- and CT-based PSI were selected. A meta-analysis was then performed of the rate of outliers in the biomechanical axis and individual femoral and tibial component alignment. Where considerable heterogeneity among studies was present or the data did not provide sufficient information for performing the meta-analysis, a qualitative synthesis was undertaken.

RESULTS

Twelve randomized controlled trials, studying 841 knees, were eligible for data extraction and meta-analysis. MRI-based PSI resulted in a significantly lower proportion of coronal plane outliers with regard to the lateral femoral component (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30-0.89, P = 0.02), without significant heterogeneity (n.s.). There were no significant differences regarding the biomechanical axis or frontal femoral and individual tibial component alignment.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that alignment with MRI-based PSI is at least as good as, if not better than, that with CT-based PSI. To prevent for malalignment, MRI should be the imaging modality of choice when performing TKA surgery with PSI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Conventional versus Smart Wireless Navigation in Total Knee Replacement: Similar Outcomes in a Randomized Prospective Study

Purpose  The development of new computer-assisted navigation technologies in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has attracted great interest; however, the debate remains open as to the real reliability of these systems. We compared conventional TKA with last generation computer-navigated TKA to find out if navigation can reach better radiographic and clinical outcomes.

Methods  Twenty patients with tricompartmental knee osteoarthritis were prospectively selected for conventional TKA ( n  = 10) or last generation computer-navigated TKA ( n  = 10). Data regarding age, gender, operated side, and previous surgery were collected. All 20 patients received the same cemented posterior-stabilized TKA. The same surgical instrumentation, including alignment and cutting guides, was used for both the techniques. A single radiologist assessed mechanical alignment and tibial slope before and after surgery. A single orthopaedic surgeon performed clinical evaluation at 1 year after the surgery. Wilcoxon's test was used to compare the outcomes of the two groups. Statistical significance was set at p  < 0.05.

Results  No significant differences in mechanical axis or tibial slope was found between the two groups. The clinical outcome was equally good with both techniques. At a mean follow-up of 15.5 months (range, 13–25 months), all patients from both groups were generally satisfied with a full return to daily activities and without a significance difference between them.

Conclusion  Our data showed that clinical and radiological outcomes of TKA were not improved by the use of computer-assisted instruments, and that the elevated costs of the system are not warranted.

Level of Evidence  This is a Level II, randomized clinical trial.

Case-related factors affecting cutting errors of the proximal tibia in total knee arthroplasty assessed by computer navigation

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine factors that contribute to bone cutting errors of conventional instrumentation for tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as assessed by an image-free navigation system. The hypothesis is that preoperative varus alignment is a significant contributory factor to tibial bone cutting errors.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of a consecutive series of 72 TKAs. The amount of the tibial first-cut errors with reference to the planned cutting plane in both coronal and sagittal planes was measured by an image-free computer navigation system. Multiple regression models were developed with the amount of tibial cutting error in the coronal and sagittal planes as dependent variables and sex, age, disease, height, body mass index, preoperative alignment, patellar height (Insall-Salvati ratio) and preoperative flexion angle as independent variables.

RESULTS

Multiple regression analysis showed that sex (male gender) (R = 0.25 p = 0.047) and preoperative varus alignment (R = 0.42, p = 0.001) were positively associated with varus tibial cutting errors in the coronal plane. In the sagittal plane, none of the independent variables was significant.

CONCLUSION

When performing TKA in varus deformity, careful confirmation of the bone cutting surface should be performed to avoid varus alignment. The results of this study suggest technical considerations that can help a surgeon achieve more accurate component placement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Does final component alignment correlate with alignment of the bone resection surfaces in cemented total knee arthroplasty?

PURPOSE

To examine, with a navigation, whether the final component alignments correlate with alignment of the bone resection surfaces in cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to evaluate the factors affecting alignment deviation.

METHODS

A total of 222 patients (276 knees) who underwent navigation-assisted TKA between September 2012 and January 2014 due to osteoarthritis were retrospectively reviewed. The deviation between the alignment of bone resection surfaces and the final alignment of femoral and tibial components was measured. Factors associated with alignment deviation of greater than 2° (outliers) were evaluated. These included age, sex, body mass index, bone mineral density (T score), preoperative and postoperative mechanical femorotibial angle, preoperative and postoperative flexion contractures, and the difference between medial and lateral gaps in knee extension or flexion.

RESULTS

Outliers consisted of 24 cases (8.6%) on the femoral coronal plane, 4 cases (1.4%) on the tibial coronal plane, and 48 cases (17.4%) on the tibial sagittal plane. In the coronal plane (femur and tibia), the outliers were associated with preoperative [p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR) 0.774; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.672-0.891] and postoperative (p < 0.001; OR 0.240; 95% CI 0.123-0.468) flexion contractures; a difference of 3 mm or more between the medial and lateral gaps in knee extension (p < 0.041; OR 5.805; 95% CI 1.075-31.343); and a T score of less than -2.5(p < 0.024; OR 5.899; 95% CI 1.258-27.664). In the sagittal plane of the tibia, the outliers were associated with preoperative (p < 0.001; OR 0.886; 95% CI 0.829-0.946) and postoperative (p < 0.031; OR 0.803; 95% CI 0.659-0.980) flexion contractures.

CONCLUSION

There was a deviation between the alignments of the bone resection surfaces and the final alignments of components. With larger preoperative and postoperative flexion contractures in the coronal and sagittal planes, there were more outlier risks. The outliers in the coronal plane were associated with a difference of 3 mm or more between the medial and lateral gaps in knee extension and poor bone quality. Awareness of such alignment deviation and related factors can help diminish the outliers after TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Comparison between cylindrical axis-reference and articular surface-reference femoral bone cut for total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Reproducing a functional flexion-extension axis (FEA) of the femur is key to achieving successful collateral ligament balance and joint line in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study compared the feasibility of cylindrical axis (CA)-reference bone cut and articular surface-reference bone cuts in reproducing the FEA for Japanese osteoarthritis patients.

METHODS

The study enrolled 122 knees from 86 patients who underwent primary TKA due to grade III or IV osteoarthritis. Data from pre-operative CT were reconstructed into three-dimensional (3D) models using 3D-planning software. Cylindrical radii of the condyles were measured, and femoral bone cut angles relative to anatomical landmarks were determined in the coronal and axial reference planes based on CA-reference and articular surface-reference methods.

RESULTS

Mean cylindrical radii for medial and lateral femoral condyles were 17.4 ± 1.6 and 17.3 ± 1.4 mm, respectively. Of the 122 knees, 46 exhibited >1 mm of difference between condyles. Fifty-three and 22 knees exhibited >2° of angular difference between CA-reference and articular surface-reference bone cuts in the coronal and axial planes. Mean angle of the CA and surgical epicondylar axis in 3D space was 4.6 ± 2.1°. As practical parameters for TKA, the angle between CA and IM rod was significantly larger than that between the distal articular surface line and IM rod in the coronal plane (p < 0.0001), indicating that CA-reference involves a smaller valgus bone cut of the distal femur than articular surface reference.

CONCLUSIONS

CA-reference bone cut of the femur is preferable to articular surface-reference bone cut for reproducing FEA in Japanese OA patients, in whom more than one-third of knees exhibited asymmetry of radii between medial and lateral condyles. In clinical practice, the CA-reference bone cut represents a good technical option for kinematically aligned TKA in the Japanese population.

Assessment of patient-specific instrumentation precision through bone resection measurements

PURPOSE

In the present study, the precision of two patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) systems for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was evaluated by comparing bony resection thicknesses of the pre-operative PSI planning and intra-operative measurements by a vernier calliper. It was hypothesized that the data provided by pre-operative planning were accurate within ±2 mm of the bone resection thickness measured intra-operatively.

METHODS

Forty-one patient-specific TKAs were examined: 25 performed with Visionaire^® technology and 16 with OtisMed^® system. PSI accuracy was analysed comparing the resected bone thicknesses in the femoral and tibial cuts with pre-operatively planned resections. To determine pre-operative planning precision, the thickness values reported by the PSI planning were subtracted from the values reported intra-operatively by the calliper.

RESULTS

The mean absolute differences between pre-operatively planned resections and corresponding intra-operative thickness measurements ranged from a minimum of 2.6 mm (SD 0.8) to a maximum of 3.6 mm (SD 1.3) in all three anatomical planes in both groups. In every plane, the mean absolute discrepancies between planned resections and measured cuts differed significantly from zero (p < 0.0001). The proportion of differences within ±2 mm between intra-operative measured resections and planned PSI cuts occurred in more than 90 % of the cohort for femoral distal resections. Less precision was reported for the femoral posterior medial cuts (70.7 % within ±2 mm) and the tibial cuts (70.7 % on the medial, 75.6 % on the lateral side). Prosthetic component alignment on the coronal and transverse planes resulted in considerable deviations from the pre-operative planning.

CONCLUSION

The two examined PSI technologies were accurate in femoral distal cuts, determining acceptable femoral component placement on the coronal plane. Posterior femoral and tibial cuts were less precise. Deviations from the pre-operative resection planning were reported in every plane. Inaccuracy was explained by ambiguous custom-made jigs placement on the bony surface.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: simpler, faster and more accurate than standard instrumentation-a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

This randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) to standard instrumentation regarding efficacy to achieve a good coronal alignment and differences in surgical time, blood loss and length of stay.

METHODS

Ninety-five of 100 randomized patients eligible for total knee arthroplasty were analysed. PSI with magnetic resonance and long-leg radiograph was performed in 47 patients, while 48 patients received standard instrumentation. Primary outcome measure was coronal alignment, evaluated with long-leg radiograph. Deviation >3° varus/valgus was considered an outlier. Surgical time was compared from skin to skin. Length of stay was a post hoc analysis. Blood loss was evaluated comparing the number of blood units spent, fall in haemoglobin and haematocrit levels.

RESULTS

Standard instrumentation had a higher number of outliers in the coronal alignment with a relative risk of 3.015, compared to PSI. Surgical time was reduced by 18 min (24.8 %) with the PSI, as well as length of stay, with a half-day reduction. Number of blood units spent was significantly less in the PSI group. Relative risk of transfusion was 7.09 for patients in the standard instrumentation group. Difference in Hg and Htc levels were not significant. No patient had to abandon PSI. Minor changes to preoperative plan occurred in 14.9 % of the patient: cut review in 4.3 % and insert change in 10.6 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) is able to provide important advantages over standard instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: it lowers the risk of outliers and transfusion, is a faster procedure and enables a shorter length of stay with a low rate of intraoperative adjustments.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with CT-based patient-specific instrumentation

PURPOSE

A 24-month prospective follow-up study was carried out to compare perioperative clinical outcomes, radiographic limb alignment, component positioning, as well as functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and conventional instrumentation (CI).

METHODS

Ninety consecutive patients, satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were scheduled to undergo TKA with either PSI or CI. A CT-based PSI was used in this study, and a senior surgeon performed all surgeries. Patients were clinically and functionally assessed preoperatively, 6 and 24 months post-operatively. Perioperative outcomes were also analysed, including operating time, haemoglobin loss, the need for blood transfusion, length of hospitalisation, and radiographic features.

RESULTS

At 24-month follow-up, clinical and functional outcomes were comparable between the two groups. PSI performed no better than CI in restoring lower limb mechanical alignment or improving component positioning. There were no differences in operating time, haemoglobin loss, transfusion rate, or length of hospitalisation between PSI and CI.

CONCLUSION

No significant clinical benefit could be demonstrated in using PSI over CI after 24 months, and routine use of PSI is not recommended in non-complicated TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

CT- versus MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To determine whether computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more suitable for the patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) systems for total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to June 2016 for prospective comparative trials that compared CT- versus MRI-based PSI systems for TKA. Our predefined primary outcome was the outliers incidence of coronal overall limb alignment.

RESULTS

Six studies with a total of 336 knees meeting the eligibility criteria, and four trials were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with MRI-based PSI systems, CT-based PSI systems were associated with a higher outliers incidence of coronal overall limb alignment (risk ratio: 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-2.72; P = 0.04), more angular errors of coronal overall limb alignment (mean difference (MD): 1.01°; 95% CI: 0.47-1.56; P = 0.0003), and longer operation time (MD: 5.02 min; 95% CI: 1.26-8.79; P = 0.009). While no significant differences in the coronal/sagittal alignment of the femoral/tibial component outliers, the angular errors of coronal overall limb alignment, the angular errors of the femoral/tibial component in coronal plane, or incidence of change of implant size of the femoral/tibial component were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The current limited evidence suggests that MRI-based PSI systems exhibit higher accuracy for TKA regarding the coronal limb axis than CT-based PSI systems. However, well-designed studies comparing CT-versus MRI-based PSI systems for TKA are warrant to confirm these results before widespread use of this technique can be recommended.

Postoperative alignment of TKA in patients with severe preoperative varus or valgus deformity: is there a difference between surgical techniques?

BACKGROUND

There have been conflicting studies published regarding the ability of various total knee arthroplasty (TKA) techniques to correct preoperative deformity. The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative radiographic alignment in patients with severe preoperative coronal deformity (≥10° varus/valgus) who underwent three different TKA techniques; manual instrumentation (MAN), computer navigated instrumentation (NAV) and patient specific instrumentation (PSI).

METHODS

Patients, who received a TKA with a preoperative coronal deformity of ≥10° with available radiographs were included in this retrospective study. The groups were: MAN; n = 54, NAV; n = 52 and PSI; n = 53. The mechanical axis (varus / valgus) and the posterior tibial slope were measured and analysed using standing long leg- and lateral radiographs.

RESULTS

The overall mean postoperative varus / valgus deformity was 2.8° (range, 0 to 9.9; SD 2.3) and 2.5° (range, 0 to 14.7; SD 2.3), respectively. The overall outliers (>3°) represented 30.2% (48 /159) of cases and were distributed as followed: MAN group: 31.5%, NAV group: 34.6%, PSI group: 24.4%. No significant statistical differences were found between these groups. The distribution of the severe outliers (>5°) was 14.8% in the MAN group, 23% in the NAV group and 5.6% in the PSI group. The PSI group had significantly (p = 0.0108) fewer severe outliers compared to the NAV group while all other pairs were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In severe varus / valgus deformity the three surgical techniques demonstrated similar postoperative radiographic alignment. However, in reducing severe outliers (> 5°) and in achieving the planned posterior tibial slope the PSI technique for TKA may be superior to computer navigation and the conventional technique. Further prospective studies are needed to determine which technique is the best regarding reducing outliers in patients with severe preoperative coronal deformity.

The accuracy of bony resection from patient-specific guides during total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

In patient-specifically instrumented (PSI) total knee arthroplasty, the correlation between the pre-operative surgical plan, accuracy of the cutting block, and intra-operative resection size is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability to accurately execute the PSI surgical plan and to add to the merging information with respect to this technology with the hypothesis that the PSI blocks would demonstrate good accuracy with regard to the bony thickness of the resections.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty TKAs using PSI (MRI/long-leg radiographs) were retrospectively analysed. All surgeries were conducted via similar surgical approach and technique, with resection performed after guide placement and alignment assessment. The bony cut thicknesses of the medial (MTP) and lateral tibial plateau (LTP), distal medial (DM), distal lateral (DL), posterior medial (PM) and posterior lateral (PL) femur were measured with a vernier calliper. The measured resection thickness was subtracted from the planned resection. Errors were defined as ≤1.5 mm (acceptable), 1.5-2.5 mm (borderline), and >2.5 mm (outliers).

RESULTS

Overall, 81 (62.3 %) of the knees were free of outliers. The distal femur cut had the highest proportion of acceptable cut error with 209 of 260 total cuts acceptable (80.4 %). The tibial cuts had the lowest proportion of "acceptable" cuts (68.9 %). Tibial cuts had more outliers (33 of 260 cuts, 12.7 %) than the femur (39 of 520 cuts, 7.5 %) (p = 0.01). Pre-operative varus (n = 97) and valgus (n = 33) deformities demonstrated 7.7 % (45/482) and 13.6 % (27/198) of cuts which were outliers, respectively (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

PSI showed only fair to moderate accuracy with 62.3 % of the knees presenting no outliers. The tibia cutting guide was less accurate than the femur. Specific attention is needed when cutting the tibia and in correction of valgus deformity. Moreover, intra-operative verifying measurements can provide feedback to the accuracy of the surgical plan.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, case series with no comparison group.

A radiological analysis of the difference between MRI- and CT-based patient-specific matched guides for total knee arthroplasty from the same manufacturer: a randomised controlled trial

AIMS

This prospective randomised controlled trial was designed to evaluate the outcome of both the MRI- and CT-based patient-specific matched guides (PSG) from the same manufacturer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 137 knees in 137 patients (50 men, 87 women) were included, 67 in the MRI- and 70 in the CT-based PSG group. Their mean age was 68.4 years (47.0 to 88.9). Outcome was expressed as the biomechanical limb alignment (centre hip-knee-ankle: HKA-axis) achieved post-operatively, the position of the individual components within 3° of the pre-operatively planned alignment, correct planned implant size and operative data (e.g. operating time and blood loss).

RESULTS

The patient demographics (e.g. age, body mass index), correct planned implant size and operative data were not significantly different between the two groups. The proportion of outliers in the coronal and sagittal plane ranged from 0% to 21% in both groups. Only the number of outliers for the posterior slope of the tibial component showed a significant difference (p = 0.004) with more outliers in the CT group (n = 9, 13%) than in the MRI group (0%).

CONCLUSION

The post-operative HKA-axis was comparable in the MRI- and CT-based PSGs, but there were significantly more outliers for the posterior slope in the CT-based PSGs.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Alignment with MRI-based PSG is at least as good as, if not better, than that of the CT-based PSG, and is the preferred imaging modality when performing TKA with use of PSG. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:786-92.

Accuracy of MRI-based vs. CT-based patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The technical objective of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to restore normal mechanical parameters to the knee. Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was developed to streamline the operative process and improve accuracy. PSI produces individualized cutting guides based on three-dimensional models of the patient's anatomy acquired from computed-tomography (CT) or magnetic-resonance imaging (MRI). However, the superiority of one modality over the other remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to compare the accuracy of patient-specific cutting guides produced from MRI or CT imaging methods in TKA.

METHODS

Electronic databases were systematically searched using relevant keywords and MeSH terms for original-data English-language publications comparing the accuracy of CT and MRI-based PSI cutting guides in TKA. Data was extracted from the text, tables and figures of studies and meta-analysed.

RESULTS

MRI-based PSI cutting guides produced a lower proportion of coronal plane outliers (>3°) with regard to overall limb mechanical axis (OR 2.75, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences between the two in terms of sagittal femoral and tibial component placement, or coronal femoral and tibial placement, or femoral component axial rotation. Tibial rotation was not analysed in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI-based patient-specific cutting guides produced a lower proportion of outliers in the overall coronal alignment of the limb compared to CT, with no significant difference between the two in terms of femoral or tibial component placement. Future studies should investigate the differences in resource usage and operative time between the two to inform surgeons' decision making when choosing an ideal imaging modality for PSI TKA.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, systematic review of cohort and comparative studies.

Surgical accuracy in high tibial osteotomy: coronal equivalence of computer navigation and gap measurement

PURPOSE

Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOW HTO) is now a successful operation with a range of indications, requiring an individualised approach to the choice of intended correction. This manuscript introduces the concept of surgical accuracy as the absolute deviation of the achieved correction from the intended correction, where small values represent greater accuracy. Surgical accuracy is compared in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) between gap measurement and computer navigation groups.

METHODS

This was a prospective RCT conducted over 3 years of 120 consecutive patients with varus malalignment and medial compartment osteoarthritis, who underwent MOW HTO. All procedures were planned with digital software. Patients were randomly assigned into gap measurement or computer navigation groups. Coronal plane alignment was judged using the mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA), before and after surgery. Absolute (positive) values were calculated for surgical accuracy in each individual case.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the mean intended correction between groups. The achieved mTFA revealed a small under-correction in both groups. This was attributed to a failure to account for saw blade thickness (gap measurement) and over-compensation for weight bearing (computer navigation). Surgical accuracy was 1.7° ± 1.2° (gap measurement) compared to 2.1° ± 1.4° (computer navigation) without statistical significance. The difference in tibial slope increases of 2.7° ± 3.9° (gap measurement) and 2.1° ± 3.9° (computer navigation) had statistical significance (P < 0.001) but magnitude (0.6°) without clinical relevance.

CONCLUSION

Surgical accuracy as described here is a new way to judge achieved alignment following knee osteotomy for individual cases. This work is clinically relevant because coronal surgical accuracy was not superior in either group. Therefore, the increased expense and surgical time associated with navigated MOW HTO is not supported, because meticulously conducted gap measurement yields equivalent surgical accuracy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional (3D) printing has numerous applications and has gained much interest in the medical world. The constantly improving quality of 3D-printing applications has contributed to their increased use on patients. This paper summarizes the literature on surgical 3D-printing applications used on patients, with a focus on reported clinical and economic outcomes.

METHODS

Three major literature databases were screened for case series (more than three cases described in the same study) and trials of surgical applications of 3D printing in humans.

RESULTS

227 surgical papers were analyzed and summarized using an evidence table. The papers described the use of 3D printing for surgical guides, anatomical models, and custom implants. 3D printing is used in multiple surgical domains, such as orthopedics, maxillofacial surgery, cranial surgery, and spinal surgery. In general, the advantages of 3D-printed parts are said to include reduced surgical time, improved medical outcome, and decreased radiation exposure. The costs of printing and additional scans generally increase the overall cost of the procedure.

CONCLUSION

3D printing is well integrated in surgical practice and research. Applications vary from anatomical models mainly intended for surgical planning to surgical guides and implants. Our research suggests that there are several advantages to 3D-printed applications, but that further research is needed to determine whether the increased intervention costs can be balanced with the observable advantages of this new technology. There is a need for a formal cost-effectiveness analysis.

Computerized tomography based "patient specific blocks" improve postoperative mechanical alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty

AIM

To compare the postoperative mechanical alignment achieved after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using computer tomography (CT) based patient specific blocks (PSB) to conventional instruments (CI).

METHODS

Total 80 knees were included in the study, with 40 knees in both the groups operated using PSB and CI. All the knees were performed by a single surgeon using the same cruciate sacrificing implants. In our study we used CT based PSB to compare with CI. Postoperative mechanical femoro-tibial angle (MFT angle) was measured on long leg x-rays using picture archiving and communication system (PACS). We compared mechanical alignment achieved using PSB and CI in TKA using statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The PSB group (group 1) included 17 females and seven males while in CI group (group 2) there were 15 females and eight males. The mean age of patients in group 1 was 60.5 years and in group 2 it was 60.2 years. The mean postoperative MFT angle measured on long-leg radiographs in group 1 was 178.23° (SD = 2.67°, range: 171.9° to 182.5°) while in group 2, the mean MFT angle was 175.73° (SD = 3.62°, range: 166.0° to 179.8°). There was significant improvement in postoperative mechanical alignment (P value = 0.001), in PSB group compared to CI. Number of outliers were also found to be less in group operated with PSB (7 Knee) compared to those operated with CI (17 Knee).

CONCLUSION

PSB improve mechanical alignment after total knee arthroplasty, compared to CI. This may lead to lower rates of revision in the PSB based TKA as compared to the conventional instrumentation.

Radiographic outcomes in the coronal plane with iASSIST™ versus optical navigation for total knee arthroplasty: A preliminary case-control study

BACKGROUND

The new navigation system iASSIST™ for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) relies on accelerometers and gyroscopes. The objective of this prospective study was to compare the accuracy of iASSIST™ to that of the conventional optical navigation system Navitrack™ by determining the rate of mechanical axis restoration (±3°), postoperative mean mechanical alignment, rate of adequate femoral and tibial component positioning, mean operative time, and occurrence of navigation-related adverse events.

HYPOTHESIS

The rate of mechanical axis restoration (±3°) is not lower with iASSIST™ than with the conventional navigation system Navitrack™.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Of 40 patients who underwent primary TKA between October 2013 and March 2014, 20 had navigation using iASSIST™ and 20 using Navitrack™. Six months after TKA, an independent observer measured three parameters on coronal radiographs: the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), and the mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA).

RESULTS

The two groups showed no significant differences for the rates of HKA restoration (P=0.3), adequate coronal positioning of the femoral component (P=0.12) and tibial component (P=0.12), or optimal success (P=0.09). Significant differences in favour of iASSIST™ were demonstrated for the values and angular deviations of the HKA (P=0.02) and mMPTA (P=0.01), whereas no significant difference was found for mLDFA. There were no significant differences regarding the mean operative time (P=0.06) or the occurrence of navigation-related adverse events (P=0.18).

DISCUSSION

The iASSIST™ system provides a neutral mechanical axis and optimal component position in the coronal plane in 95% of cases, indicating that it is as accurate as the optical navigation system Navitrack™.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, prospective case-control study.

[Total and unicompartmental knee replacement. Patient-specific Instrumentation]

BACKGROUND

The objective of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI Zimmer®) technology is to optimize positioning and selection of components as well as surgical procedure in uni- and bicompartimental knee replacement. The article contains a description of the planning and surgical technique and evaluates the method based on own results and literature.

METHODS

Using MRI or CT scans a virtual 3D model of the joint is created in order to simulate and plan the implant positioning. According to these data, pin placement and/or cutting guides are produced, which enable the surgeon to transfer the planning to the surgical procedure. In a prospective comparative study 88 patients (44 per each of the two techniques) were operated by one surgeon receiving the same TKA using either MRI-based PSI or a conventional technique. The number of surgical trays, operating time, intraoperative changes and frontal alignment using a full leg x‑ray (70 cases) were compared. In 17 patients the method was applied with unicondylar knee replacement.

RESULTS

Anatomical abnormalities could be detected preoperatively and considered during the operation. With PSI the number of trays could be reduced and predictability of the component size was more precise. Intraoperative changes became necessary only for distal femoral (25 %) and proximal tibial (36 %) resection and tibial rotation (40 %). Alignment was more precise in the PSI cases

DISCUSSION

PSI using the applied technique proved to be practicable and reliable. The advantages of precise planning became obvious. Results concerning alignment are inconsistent in the literature. Soft tissue balancing has only been included in the technique to a limited degree so far. PSI is still in an early stage of development and further development opportunities should be exploited before final assessment.

[The MyKnee® patient-specific system. Rationale, Technique and Results]

BACKGROUND

Adequate three-dimensional component positioning and restoration of overall limb alignment are primary goals in total knee arthroplasty. Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) is a potential way to improve accuracy of knee reconstruction surgery. However, currently available literature regarding the reliability of PSI shows inconsistent results for limb alignment restoration and component positioning.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this article is to illustrate the rationale for using PSI in total knee arthroplasty, to demonstrate the surgical technique, and to present our outcome with the MyKnee(®) system.

METHODS

We illustrate in detail the logistics and workflow involved in PSI for total knee arthroplasty. Finally, we present clinical and radiological results of patients undergoing knee arthroplasty using the MyKnee(®) system compared to a conventional instrumentation group.

RESULTS

PSI significantly improved accuracy and reduced the number of outliers regarding neutral mechanical alignment restoration as well as three-dimensional component positioning compared to conventional instrumentation. The early clinical outcome was comparable between the two instrumentation groups. However, clinical outcome in the subgroup of patients within ± 3° from neutral mechanical limb alignment was superior to limb alignment outliers.

CONCLUSION

The MyKnee(®) PSI system presents a reliable way to improve the accuracy of mechanical limb alignment restoration and three-dimensional component positioning in total knee arthroplasty. Nonetheless, an adequate surgical technique remains the crucial factor for successful total knee reconstruction.

Patient-specific instrumentation improved mechanical alignment, while early clinical outcome was comparable to conventional instrumentation in TKA

PURPOSE

The aim of this prospective study was to compare early clinical outcome, radiological limb alignment, and three-dimensional (3D)-component positioning between conventional and computed tomography (CT)-based patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in primary mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Two hundred ninety consecutive patients (300 knees) with severe, debilitating osteoarthritis scheduled for TKA were included in this study using either conventional instrumentation (CVI, n = 150) or PSI (n = 150). Patients were clinically assessed before and 2 years after surgery according to the Knee-Society-Score (KSS) and the visual-analog-scale for pain (VAS). Additionally, the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Oxford-Knee-Score (OKS) were collected at follow-up. To evaluate accuracy of CVI and PSI, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and 3D-component positioning were assessed on postoperative radiographs and CT.

RESULTS

Data of 222 knees (CVI: n = 108, PSI: n = 114) were available for analysis after a mean follow-up of 28.6 ± 5.2 months. At the early follow-up, clinical outcome (KSS, VAS, WOMAC, OKS) was comparable between the two groups. Mean HKA-deviation from the targeted neutral mechanical axis (CVI: 2.2° ± 1.7°; PSI: 1.5° ± 1.4°; p < 0.001), rates of outliers (CVI: 22.2%; PSI: 9.6%; p = 0.016), and 3D-component positioning outliers were significantly lower in the PSI group. Non-outliers (HKA: 180° ± 3°) showed better clinical results than outliers at the 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-based PSI compared with CVI improves accuracy of mechanical alignment restoration and 3D-component positioning in primary TKA. While clinical outcome was comparable between the two instrumentation groups at early follow-up, significantly inferior outcome was detected in the subgroup of HKA-outliers.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective comparative study, Level II.

The Effect of Femoral Cutting Guide Design Improvements for Patient-Specific Instruments

Although the application of patient-specific instruments (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) increases the cost of the surgical procedure, PSI may reduce operative time and improve implant alignment, which could reduce the number of revision surgeries. We report our experience with TKA using PSI techniques in 120 patients from March to December 2014. PSI for TKA were created from data provided by computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); which imaging technology is more reliable for the PSI technique remains unclear. In the first 20 patients, the accuracy of bone resection and PSI stability were compared between CT and MRI scans with presurgical results as a reference; MRI produced better results. In the second and third groups, each with 50 patients, the results of bone resection and stability were compared in MRI scans with respect to the quality of scanning due to motion artifacts and experienced know-how in PSI design, respectively. The optimized femoral cutting guide design for PSI showed the closest outcomes in bone resection and PSI stability with presurgical data. It is expected that this design could be a reasonable guideline in PSI.

Comparison between patient-specific instruments and conventional instruments and computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

The current study investigated the accuracy in achieving proper lower limb alignment and individual component positions after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with 3 different instrumentation techniques. It was hypothesized that patient-specific instruments (PSI) would achieve more accurate lower limb alignment and component positions compared to conventional instruments (CON).

METHODS

Ninety knees in 81 patients were randomized in 1:1:1 ratio into CON, computer navigation (NAV) and PSI groups to receive TKA. The surgical routines were standardized. The lower limb mechanical axis and individual component positions were assessed on standard radiographs. Tourniquet time, operation time and patients' functional scores were documented.

RESULTS

Conventional instruments and PSI were more likely to result in an excessively flexed femoral component (p = 0.001) compared to NAV. Number of outliers in postoperative lower limb alignment, and other components positions in the coronal and sagittal plane showed no statistically significant difference. The mean tourniquet time and operation time was significantly shorter in CON and PSI groups than NAV group (p < 0.001). Four early complications occurred in the PSI group (p = 0.015). At 3-month follow-up, there was no difference in terms of the knee range of motion and patients' function among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

No significant radiological and clinical benefit could be demonstrated in using PSI over CON or NAV in TKA. Routine use of PSI is not recommended because of the extra cost and waiting time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Three-dimensional imaging and templating improve glenoid implant positioning

BACKGROUND

Preoperative quantitative assessment of glenoid bone loss, selection of the glenoid component, and definition of its desired location can be challenging. Placement of the glenoid component in the desired location at the time of surgery is difficult, especially with severe glenoid pathological conditions.

METHODS

Forty-six patients were randomly assigned to three-dimensional computed tomographic preoperative templating with either standard instrumentation or with patient-specific instrumentation and were compared with a nonrandomized group of seventeen patients with two-dimensional imaging and standard instrumentation used as historical controls. All patients had postoperative three-dimensional computed tomographic metal artifact reduction imaging to measure and to compare implant position with the preoperative plan.

RESULTS

Using three-dimensional imaging and templating with or without patient-specific instrumentation, there was a significant improvement achieving the desired implant position within 5° of inclination or 10° of version when compared with two-dimensional imaging and standard instrumentation.

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional assessment of glenoid anatomy and implant templating and the use of these images at the time of surgery improve the surgeon's ability to place the glenoid implant in the desired location.

Intraoperative navigation of patient-specific instrumentation does not predict final implant position

The purpose of this study was to determine if intraoperative navigation predicted final implant position of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed with patient-specific instrumentation (PSI). We retrospectively reviewed 60 TKAs performed with PSI and imageless navigation. These values were compared to postoperative coronal alignment based on long-leg radiographs, as well as rotation and tibial slope based on CT scans. The intraoperative coronal position of the tibia as measured by the intraoperative navigation indicated a significantly higher deviation from the neutral mechanical axis than the actual final position (P=0.03). Similarly, tibial slope and femoral component rotation measured by intraoperative navigation significantly deviated from the final slope and femoral component rotation (P<0.0001). In conclusion, intraoperative navigation of PSI position showed a significantly high deviation from the true final implant position.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Computerised tomography vs magnetic resonance imaging for modeling of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty

AIM

To summarise and compare currently available evidence regarding accuracy of pre-operative imaging, which is one of the key choices for surgeons contemplating patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) surgery.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and EMBASE medical literature databases were searched, from January 1990 to December 2013, to identify relevant studies. The data from several clinical studies was assimilated to allow appreciation and comparison of the accuracy of each modality. The overall accuracy of each modality was calculated as proportion of outliers > 3% in the coronal plane of both computerised tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

Seven clinical studies matched our inclusion criteria for comparison and were included in our study for statistical analysis. Three of these reported series using MRI and four with CT. Overall percentage of outliers > 3% in patients with CT-based PSI systems was 12.5% vs 16.9% for MRI-based systems. These results were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Although many studies have been undertaken to determine the ideal pre-operative imaging modality, conclusions remain speculative in the absence of long term data. Ultimately, information regarding accuracy of CT and MRI will be the main determining factor. Increased accuracy of pre-operative imaging could result in longer-term savings, and reduced accumulated dose of radiation by eliminating the need for post-operative imaging and revision surgery.

Radiographic outcome of limb-based versus knee-based patient specific guides in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patient specific guides (PSG's) were developed to improve overall component alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to undertake a comparative radiographic study of two commonly used PSG and determine whether the radiographic technique used to construct the PSG had a significant effect on overall alignment.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study examined the accuracy of limb-based (n=112) versus knee-based (n=105) MR PSG in restoring the mechanical axis in three planes according to post-operative Perth CT scan protocol.

RESULTS

Limb-based MR and knee-based MR PSG systems both restored overall hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), femoral coronal alignment, tibial coronal alignment, femoral sagittal alignment, tibial sagittal alignment and femoral rotation alignment to within 3° of a neutral mechanical axis with similar precision (91.1% vs. 86.7% p=0.30, 97.3% vs. 96.2% p=0.63, 97.3% vs. 97.1% p=0.94, 94.6% vs. 89.4% p=0.16, 90.2% vs. 81.0% p=0.05, 91.1% vs. 86.7% p=0.30, respectively). However, when the secondary outcome measure of alignment within 2° was assessed, limb-based MR PSG restored HKAA, femoral coronal and tibial sagittal alignment with greater precision than knee-based MR PSG (73.2% vs. 64.8% p=0.016, 93.8% vs. 80.8% p=0.004 and 82.1% vs. 62.9% p=0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study recommend the use of limb-based MR PSG for improved precision in the restoration of neutral mechanical alignment over knee-based MR PSG in TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level III.

Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a literature review

During the past decade, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been markedly increased. Recently, patient-specific custom cutting guides have been commercially introduced in order to achieve an accurate component alignment during TKA. In fact, these cutting blocks are specific to a patient's knee anatomy and should help the surgeons to perform bone cuts, reducing the complexity of conventional alignment and sizing tools. Nevertheless, there are critical arguments against patient-specific cutting guides for routine use, such as poor evidence and higher costs. Additionally, there are still no mild and long-term results available that describe the clinical outcomes following patient-specific instrumentation of TKR, cost-effectiveness and lower revision rates. Aim of the current manuscript was to describe the recent improvements of the surgical technique and instrumentation of TKA, reviewing the recent literature concerning the PSI technology.

Small improvements in mechanical axis alignment achieved with MRI versus CT-based patient-specific instruments in TKA: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Patient-specific instrumentation in TKA has the proposed benefits of improving coronal and sagittal alignment and rotation of the components. In contrast, the literature is inconsistent if the use of patient-specific instrumentation improves alignment in comparison to conventional instrumentation. Depending on the manufacturer, patient-specific instrumentation is based on either MRI or CT scans. However, it is unknown whether one patient-specific instrumentation approach is more accurate than the other and if there is a potential benefit in terms of reduction of duration of surgery.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We compared the accuracy of MRI- and CT-based patient-specific instrumentation with conventional instrumentation and with each other in TKAs. The three approaches also were compared with respect to validated outcomes scores and duration of surgery.

METHODS

A randomized clinical trial was conducted in which 90 patients were enrolled and divided into three groups: CT-based, MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation, and conventional instrumentation. The groups were not different regarding age, male/female sex distribution, and BMI. In all groups, coronal and sagittal alignments were measured on postoperative standing long-leg and lateral radiographs. Component rotation was measured on CT scans. Clinical outcomes (Knee Society and WOMAC scores) were evaluated preoperatively and at a mean of 3 months postoperatively and the duration of surgery was analyzed for each patient. MRI- and CT-based patient-specific instrumentation groups were first compared with conventional instrumentation, the patient-specific instrumentation groups were compared with each other, and all three approaches were compared for clinical outcome measures and duration of surgery.

RESULTS

Compared with conventional instrumentation MRI- and CT-based patient-specific instrumentation showed higher accuracy regarding the coronal limb axis (MRI versus conventional, 1.0° [range, 0°-4°] versus 4.5° [range, 0°-8°], p < 0.001; CT versus conventional, 3.0° [range, 0°-5°] versus 4.5° [range, 0°-8°], p = 0.02), femoral rotation (MRI versus conventional, 1.0° [range, 0°-2°] versus 4.0° [range, 1°-7°], p < 0.001; CT versus conventional, 1.0° [range, 0°-2°] versus 4.0° [range, 1°-7°], p < 0.001), and tibial slope (MRI versus conventional, 1.0° [range, 0°-2°] versus 3.5° [range, 1°-7°], p < 0.001; CT versus conventional, 1.0° [range, 0°-2°] versus 3.5° [range, 1°-7°], p < 0.001), but the differences were small. Furthermore, MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation showed a smaller deviation in the postoperative coronal mechanical limb axis compared with CT-based patient-specific instrumentation (MRI versus CT, 1.0° [range, 0°-4°] versus 3.0° [range, 0°-5°], p = 0.03), while there was no difference in femoral rotation or tibial slope. Although there was a significant reduction of the duration of surgery in both patient-specific instrumentation groups in comparison to conventional instrumentation (MRI versus conventional, 58 minutes [range, 53-67 minutes] versus 76 minutes [range, 57-83 minutes], p < 0.001; CT versus conventional, 63 minutes [range, 59-69 minutes] versus 76 minutes [range, 57-83 minutes], p < .001), there were no differences in the postoperative Knee Society pain and function and WOMAC scores among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this study supports that patient-specific instrumentation increased accuracy compared with conventional instrumentation and that MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation is more accurate compared with CT-based patient-specific instrumentation regarding coronal mechanical limb axis, differences are only subtle and of questionable clinical relevance. Because there are no differences in the long-term clinical outcome or survivorship yet available, the widespread use of this technique cannot be recommended.

Patient-specific computed tomography based instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare radiological results of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed with patient-specific computed tomography (CT)-based instrumentation and conventional technique. The main study hypothesis was that CT-based patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) increases the accuracy of TKA.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized controlled trial was carried out between January and December 2011. A group of 112 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to an experimental or control group. The experimental group comprised 52 patients operated on with the aid of the Signature CT-based implant positioning system. The control group consisted of 60 patients operated on using conventional instrumentation. The radiographic evaluation of implant positioning and overall coronal alignment was performed 12 months after the surgery by using standing anteroposterior radiographs of the entire lower limb and standard lateral radiographs.

RESULTS

Of the 112 patients initially enrolled for the study, 95 were included in the subsequent analyses. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in respect to coronal and sagittal component positioning and overall coronal alignment, except for frontal tibial component positioning. For this parameter, better results were obtained in the control group, with borderline statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study did not reveal superiority of the CT-based PSI system over conventional instrumentation. Further high-quality investigations of patient-specific systems are absolutely indispensable to assess their utility for TKA. In our opinion, the surgeon applying PSI technology is required to have advanced knowledge and considerable experience with the conventional method.