Biomechanical evaluation of MPFL reconstructions: differences in dynamic contact pressure between gracilis and fascia lata graft

Evaluating the Impact of Graft Tensioning and Leg Positioning in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction on Patellofemoral Pressure Profile: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To systematically review the effects of pretension on patellofemoral pressure distribution and determine which flexion angle at fixation allows for the most reliable restoration of patellofemoral kinematics and mechanics.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and included studies from PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus from January 2000 to July 2024. We focused on cadaveric studies measuring patellofemoral pressure after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. Two authors extracted data independently, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies scale. Statistical analyses used fixed- and random-effect models to compare patellofemoral pressure at various flexion angles (30°, 60°, 90°) and pretension levels (2 N, 10 N, 10+ N).

RESULTS

Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, with 8 qualifying for quantitative analysis. No significant difference in patellofemoral pressure was found between native and reconstructed knees across all flexion angles and pretension levels. Increased medial patellofemoral pressure was shown in the 10+ N pretension group, particularly at 90° of flexion; however, no statistically significant differences were found. Most studies reported graft fixation at 30° of knee flexion, effectively restoring native patellofemoral mechanics.

CONCLUSIONS

MPFL reconstruction at various angles of knee flexion and pretension levels showed no statistically significant differences in patellofemoral pressure compared to the native state. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding the optimal graft pretension and knee flexion angle for MPFL reconstruction can help surgeons more accurately and reliably restore native patellofemoral biomechanics and kinematics.

Is fascia lata a viable graft for MPFL reconstruction? An overview of surgical technique and scoping literature review

Lateral patellar dislocation is irrefutably one of the most common knee injuries, while subsequent medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) damage requires proper orthopedic care. Treatment of these injuries is regularly associated with the need for MPFL reconstruction surgery. This operation, often in combination with other procedures, can result very fruitful in restoring knee kinematics. There is a considerable variety of options for the orthopedic surgeon to choose from regarding graft selection when performing MPFL reconstruction surgery, including the semitendinosus tendon, the gracilis, and others. Notwithstanding, utilizing the fascia lata as an autograft or allograft for MPFL reconstruction has emerged as a promising alternative. Perusing the existing literature, not any review paper could be found examining the efficacy of fascia lata as a MPFL reconstruction graft. As a result, a thorough search was conducted in various databases to investigate and explore the studies analyzing this type of MPFL reconstruction surgery. The number of papers scrutinizing this operation was exceedingly narrow. However, out of these studies, it can be concluded that opting for fascia lata grafts when executing MPFL reconstruction surgery features some considerable advantages, involving similar biomechanics to the native MPFL, no hamstrings damage and quicker rehabilitation among others. This paper accentuates the requirement for considering fascia lata as a viable graft option in MPFL reconstruction surgery and the necessity for more pertinent research in order to attain more reliable inferences.

Biomechanical Properties and Kinematics of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Background

While the biomechanical properties of the native medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) have been well studied, there is no comprehensive summary of the biomechanics of MPFL reconstruction (MPFLR). An accurate understanding of the kinematic properties and functional behavior of current techniques used in MPFLR is imperative to restoring native biomechanics and improving outcomes.

Purpose

To provide a comprehensive review of the biomechanical effects of variations in MPFLR, specifically to determine the effect of graft choice and reconstruction technique.

Study Design

Systematic review.

Methods

A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A total of 32 studies met inclusion criteria: (1) using ≥8 human cadaveric specimens, (2) reporting on a component of MPFLR, and (3) having multiple comparison groups.

Results

Gracilis, semitendinosus, and quadriceps grafts demonstrated an ultimate load to failure (N) of 206.2, 102.8, and 190.0 to 205.0 and stiffness (N/mm) of 20.4, 8.5, and 21.4 to 33.6, respectively. Single-bundle and double-bundle techniques produced an ultimate load to failure (N) of 171 and 213 and stiffness (N/mm) of 13.9 and 17.1, respectively. Anchors placed centrally and superomedially in the patella produced the smallest degree of length changes throughout range of motion in contrast to anchors placed more proximally. Sutures, suture anchors, and transosseous tunnels all produced similar ultimate load to failure, stiffness, and elongation data. Femoral tunnel malpositioning resulted in significant increases in contact pressures, patellar translation, tilt, and graft tightening or loosening. Low tension grafts (2 N) most closely restored the patellofemoral contact pressures, translation, and tilt. Graft fixation angles variably and inconsistently altered contact pressures, and patellar translation and tilt.

Conclusion

Data demonstrated that placement of the MPFLR femoral tunnel at the Schöttle point is critical to success. Femoral tunnel diameter should be ≥2 mm greater than graft diameter to limit graft advancement and overtensioning. Graft fixation, regardless of graft choice or fixation angle, is optimally performed under minimal tension with patellar fixation at the medial and superomedial patella. However, lower fixation angles may reduce graft strain, and higher fixation angles may exacerbate anisometry and length changes if femoral tunnel placement is nonanatomic.

Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament with nonresorbable suture tape normalizes patellar maltracking independent of patella-side fixation technique

PURPOSE

Patellar maltracking caused by a rupture of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) can be improved by MPFL reconstruction (MPFL-R) with a tendon graft. Nonresorbable suture tape (FiberTape^®, FT) is possibly becoming an option to tendon grafts for MPFL-R. Patella-side fixation of FT can be performed with suture anchors or via soft-tissue fixation. The aim of this study was to investigate patellar tracking considering soft-tissue-based and anchor-based patella-side fixation techniques.

METHODS

In eight fresh-frozen human knee joint specimens (m/f 4/4; age 75 ± 10 years), the MPFL was identified, and a rupture was placed near the femoral insertion site. In the study group (SG; 4 knees), soft-tissue fixation of the FT was performed at the medial patellar retinaculum; in the control group (CG; 4 knees), FT was fixed at the patella via suture anchors. For native MPFL (nMPFL), ruptured ("injured") MPFL (iMPFL) and reconstructed MPFL (FT-MPFL-SG, respectively, FT-MPFL-CG) cone beam CT scans were performed in 15°, 30°, and 45° of knee joint flexion. Patellar tracking was assessed using the radiological parameters patellar tilt (PT), congruence angle (CA) and posterior patellar edge-trochlear groove ratio (PTR).

RESULTS

All recorded radiological parameters increased, respectively, decreased in the CG and SG from the nMPFL to the iMPFL state. After MPFL-R, all parameters normalized when compared to the intact state (nMPFL), regardless of patella-side fixation technique. All investigated parameters of patellotrochlear alignment were positively, respectively, negatively significantly (p < 0.05) correlated throughout all evaluated conditions (nMPFL, iMPFL, FT-MPFL-SG, FT-MPFL-CG).

CONCLUSION

MPFL-R with a nonresorbable suture tape can normalize patellar maltracking in fresh-frozen human knee joint specimens in earlier degrees of knee joint flexion independent of patella-side fixation technique. The investigated parameters of patellotrochlear alignment correlate with each other.

Lateral Release With Tibial Tuberosity Transfer Alters Patellofemoral Biomechanics Promoting Multidirectional Patellar Instability

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a finite element (FE) model of the patellofemoral (PF) joint to characterize patellofemoral instability, and to highlight the effect of lateral retinacular release in combination with tibial tuberosity transfer with respect to contact pressures (CP), contact area (CA), and kinematics during knee flexion.

METHODS

A comprehensive, dynamic FE model of the knee joint was developed and validated through parametric comparison of PF kinematics, CP, and CA between FE simulations and in vitro, cadaveric experiments. Using this FE model, we characterized the effect of patellar instability, lateral retinacular release (LR), and tibial tuberosity transfer (TTT) in the setting of medial patellofemoral ligament injury during knee flexion.

RESULTS

There was a high level of agreement in CP, CA, lateral patellar displacement, anterior patellar displacement, and superior patellar displacement between the FE model and the in vitro data (P values 0.19, 0.16, 0.81, 0.10, and 0.36, respectively). Instability conditions demonstrated the greatest CP compared to all of the other conditions. During all degrees of flexion, TTT and concomitant lateral release (TTT + LR) decreased CP significantly. TTT alone shows a consistently lower CA compared to nonrelease conditions with subsequent lateral release further decreasing CA.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate that the FE model described reliably simulates PF kinematics and CP within 1 SD in uncomplicated cadaveric specimens. The FE model is able to show that tibial tubercle transfer in combination with lateral retinacular release markedly decreases patellofemoral CP and CA and increases lateral patellar displacement that may decrease bony stabilization of the patella within the trochlear groove and promote lateral patellar instability.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The goal of surgical correction for patellar instability focuses on reestablishing normal PF kinematics. By developing an FE model that can demonstrate patient PF kinematics and the results of different surgical approaches, surgeons may tailor their treatment to the best possible outcome. Of the surgical approaches that have been described, the biomechanical effects of the combination of TTT with lateral retinacular release have not been studied. Thus, the FE analysis will help shed light on the effect of the combination of TTT with lateral retinacular release on PF kinematics.

Biomechanical comparison of two medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction techniques: Quadriceps tendon fixation versus single-tunnel patella fixation with gracilis autograft did not differ in load to failure and stiffness

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ultimate failure load and stiffness of two patellar fixation techniques for medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction: (1) quadriceps tendon fixation (QT), (2) single tunnel (STG) patella fixation with gracilis autograft.

METHODS

A total of 16 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees (eight matched pairs) were randomized into two groups (QT vs. STG). The MPFL reconstructions were subjected to cyclic loading for 10 cycles to 30 N and then tested to failure at a constant displacement rate of 15 mm/min using a materials-testing machine (MTS 810 Universal Testing System). Failure mode, ultimate failure load and stiffness were recorded for each cadaveric specimen.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in mean ultimate failure load among groups (P = 0.35). The STG group failed at a mean ultimate load of 190.04 N [standard deviation (SD) 23.18] and the QT group failed at 206.24 N (SD 37.99). The STG group had a mean stiffness of 21.38 N/mm (SD 1.44). This was not significantly higher than the mean stiffness value achieved for the QT group at 20.36 N/mm (SD 1.3) (P = 0.19). In the QT group all reconstructions failed due to tendon rupture at the patella attachment. The reason for failure in the STG group was the graft-suture connection.

CONCLUSIONS

This cadaver study showed no statistically significant difference in biomechanical performance of the evaluated patella fixation techniques, in terms of maximum load to failure and stiffness. Both techniques are reliable in terms of biomechanical properties and could offer additional surgical solutions.

Good results are reported at 60-month follow-up after medial patello-femoral ligament reconstruction with fascia lata allograft for recurrent patellar dislocation

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new minimally invasive surgical technique for the reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) with fascia lata allograft at 60-month minimum follow-up.

METHODS

Nineteen consecutive patients with chronic recurrent patellar dislocation were treated with MPFL reconstruction (53% isolate procedure, 47% in combination with other treatments). Seventeen patients (11 males/6 females) were available at 60-month follow-up and were clinically evaluated with validated scores. New episodes of patellar dislocation were considered failures. Radiographic and CT scan evaluation were executed preoperatively and at 60-month follow-up.

RESULTS

All clinical scores improved from preoperative assessment to 24-month and 60-month follow-up (p < 0.001). Kujala score increased from 61.2 ± 18.1 to 86.7 ± 8.7 and 82.1 ± 10.2; KOOS increased from 54.5 ± 19 to 86.8 ± 9.6 and 84.3 ± 7.6; VAS for pain decreased from 5.1 ± 2.2 to 2.4 ± 1.5 and 1.7 ± 1.2; Tegner score increased from 3 [2-4] to 5 [3-8] and 5 [3-9], respectively. Objective IKDC improved too. No significant improvements between the 24-month and 60-month follow-up evaluations were recorded. Anterior knee pain was reported in two patients (12%). Treatment failure, a new episode of patellar dislocation 25 months after the surgery, was observed in one patient (6%). Radiographic OA changes were not statistically significant between preop and 60-month follow-up. Tuberosity-troclear groove (TT-TG) distance and the patellar tilt angle were subjected to significant changes due to MPFL reconstruction and associated procedures.

CONCLUSION

MPFL reconstruction with fascia lata allograft, alone or combined with other procedures, is a reliable treatment option for recurrent patellar dislocation with a success rate of 94% and without cartilage deterioration at 60-month follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using FiberTape and Knotless SwiveLock Anchors

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction usually involves hamstring autografts and is associated with donor-site morbidity. Excellent short-term results with MPFL reconstruction using synthetic materials have been reported. Although synthetics do not sacrifice autologous tissues, their material properties are significantly different from those of biological tissues. Therefore, accurate surgical procedures are required to achieve excellent results. The purpose of this report was to describe our surgical method for MPFL reconstruction using FiberTape and knotless SwiveLock anchors.

Patellofemoral Contact Pressure for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Suture Tape Varies With the Knee Flexion Angle: A Biomechanical Evaluation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the knee flexion angle during graft fixation on patellofemoral (PF) contact pressure in medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using polyester suture tape and knotless anchors.

METHODS

Nine human knees (mean age 74.9 ± 14.1 years) were used in this study. Polyester suture tape was fixed at the medial edge of the patella with two 3.5-mm knotless anchors, and then to the femur with a 4.75-mm knotless anchor at 4 different knee flexion angles (0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°). A pressure sensor was used to measure the maximum contact pressure (MCP) of the medial and lateral PF joints in the intact knee and in postreconstruction knees at each knee flexion angle (0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°). Each MCP was normalized to that of the intact knee. A statistical comparison was made between MCP in the intact and reconstructed knees.

RESULTS

The normalized MCP of the medial PF joint fixed at either 0° or 30° significantly increased at 60° of knee flexion (P = .036 and .042, respectively) and at 90° of knee flexion (P = .002 and .001, respectively). Conversely, the normalized MCP fixed at 60° and 90° remained at the same level as the intact knees at all angles of knee flexion. The normalized MCP of the lateral PF joint showed no significant difference at any fixation angle compared with intact knees.

CONCLUSION

To avoid excessive PF joint contact pressure after MPFL reconstruction, it may be best to fix polyester suture tape between 60° and 90° of knee flexion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Fixation of the polyester suture tape with a knotless anchor for MPFL reconstruction should be at 60° to 90° of knee flexion to most closely restore PF joint contact pressures to that of the intact knee.

Selective bundle tensioning in double-bundle MPFL reconstruction to improve restoration of dynamic patellofemoral contact pressure

PURPOSE

To evaluate the optimal graft tension angles in a medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with selective bundle tensioning in order to restore patellofemoral contact pressure distributions closest to the native state.

METHODS

Twelve human cadaveric knee specimens were mounted with the femur on a custom-made fixation device allowing free range of motion in the knee joint for testing. Using a sensitive pressure film (Tekscan) patellofemoral contact pressure was measured in 15° intervals during a dynamic flexion movement from 0°-90° in the native state, in cut MPFL and after MPFL-reconstruction with a gracilis tendon. The graft was separated in two bundles and was fixed independently on the patella using two knotless anchors. Two groups were made with either the proximal or distal bundle fixed at the femur at a knee flexion angle of 30° and the corresponding other bundle subsequently fixed at the femur at 15°, 45°, 60°, 75° and 90° of knee flexion using extra-cortical fixation and controlled tension of 2N in both groups. The sequence of the flexion angles at the graft fixation was alternated. Pressure measurements were repeated after every fixation of the graft.

RESULTS

Cutting the MPFL resulted in significantly reduced patellofemoral contact pressure at all flexion angles. After MPFL reconstruction the patellofemoral contact pressure remained significantly reduced during dynamic knee flexion in all tested double-bundle combinations (p < 0.05) except for fixation of the proximal bundle in 30° and the distal bundle in 75°. Selective evaluation of lateral patellofemoral contact pressure, however, showed significant reduction in all tested double-bundle combinations (p < 0.05) from 15° to 90°. Evaluation of isolated medial patellofemoral pressure changes showed no significant difference in all tested combinations compared to the intact knee. Furthermore, evaluation of the isolated proximal and distal patellofemoral contact pressure also revealed a significantly reduced contact pressure in all tested double-bundle combinations (p < 0.05) except for fixation of the proximal bundle in 30° and the distal bundle in 75°.

CONCLUSION

According to this study, selective bundle tensioning in anatomic MPFL-reconstruction should be considered as an easy and more anatomic alternative to current popular techniques to restore patella kinematics and give clear recommendation about knee flexion angle and tension during fixation. Although tensioning two bundles separately may further improve clinical results. If performed, fixation of the graft is recommended under low tension (2N) with the proximal bundle at 30° and the distal bundle at 75° of knee flexion.

Repair of the medial patellofemoral ligament with suture tape augmentation leads to similar primary contact pressures and joint kinematics like reconstruction with a tendon graft: a biomechanical comparison

PURPOSE

To compare suture tape-augmented MPFL repair with allograft MPFL reconstruction using patellofemoral contact pressure and joint kinematics to assess the risk of patellofemoral over-constrainment at point zero.

METHODS

A total of ten fresh frozen cadaveric knee specimens were tested in four different conditions of the MPFL: (1) native, (2) cut, (3) reconstructed with tendon graft, and (4) augmented with suture tape. The patellofemoral mean pressure (MP), peak pressure (PP) and contact area (CA) were measured independently for the medial and lateral compartments using pressure-sensitive films. Patellar tilt (PT) and shift (PS) were measured using an optical 3D motion tracking system. Measurements were recorded at 0°, 10°, 20°, 30°, 60° and 90° of flexion. Both the tendon graft and the internal brace were preloaded with 2 N, 5 N, and 10 N.

RESULTS

There was no significant differences found between surgical methods for medial MP, medial PP, medial CA, lateral MP and PS at any preload or flexion angle. Significant differences were seen for lateral PP at 20° knee flexion and 10 N preload (suture tape vs. reconstruction: 1045.9 ± 168.7 kPa vs. 1003.0 ± 151.9 kPa; p = 0.016), for lateral CA at 10° knee flexion and 10 N preload (101.4 ± 39.5 mm² vs. 108.7 ± 36.6 mm²; p = 0.040), for PT at 10° knee flexion and 2 N preload (- 1.9 ± 2.5° vs. - 2.5 ± 2.3°; p = 0.033) and for PT at 0° knee flexion and 10 N preload (- 0.8 ± 2.5° vs. - 1.8 ± 3.1°; p = 0.040). A preload of 2 N on the suture tape was the closest in restoring the native joint kinematics.

CONCLUSIONS

Suture tape augmentation of the MPFL resulted in similar primary contact pressures and joint kinematics in comparison with MPFL reconstruction using a tendon graft. A pretension of 2 N was found to restore the knee joint closest to normal patellofemoral kinematics.

Autograft vs Allograft Comparison in Pediatric Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Background: Patella instability and medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) injury are frequently encountered in pediatric patients. MPFL reconstruction is often chosen to treat this condition with good results; however, no consensus has been reached about which graft or technique to use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in graft survivorship, clinical outcomes (assessed with Kujala scores), and cost between autograft and allograft usage in MPFL reconstruction in pediatric patients. Methods: In this retrospective review of patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction between 2012-2015, autograft gracilis tendon was used for Group 1, and allograft gracilis tendon was used for Group 2. Outcomes were graft survivorship, postoperative Kujala scores, operative time, costs, graft size, and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance. Results: Fifty-six patients were included in this study, 21 in Group 1 and 35 in Group 2. No differences in age, sex, or chronicity were seen between the groups. Patients in Group 1 had longer operative times (134.5 minutes vs 97.3 minutes, P=0.0002), higher rates of graft failure (28.6% vs 0%, P=0.0037), and lower Kujala scores (80.3 vs 92.1, P=0.0032) compared to Group 2. All graft failures occurred in patients with chronic patella dislocations and occurred an average of 13.8 months postoperatively. Overall, autograft was costlier than allograft because of the cost of reoperation. Conclusion: This study supports the use of allograft for chronic patellar instability because of improved graft survivorship and clinical outcome scores, as well as the lower cost and reoperation rate.

Editorial Commentary: Medial Patellofemoral Complex: Driving a Better Understanding of Medial Knee Anatomy

Although its importance as the prime restraint to lateral patellar instability is undoubted, the anatomy of the medial patellofemoral ligament has never been agreed on. Since it was first described by Warren and Marshall in 1979, most of the anatomic studies confirmed its presence in 90% of the cases, but they usually provide inconsistent descriptions of its femoral and patellar attachments. It is proven that length changes in the reconstructed medial patellofemoral ligament depend principally on the femoral attachment site. Moreover, the femoral attachment site affects the patellar tilt, translation, and joint reaction force. Because of the early inconsistent descriptions of the medial patellofemoral ligament attachment sites, some authors have suggested that its anatomy is not fixed or may be patient specific.

Biomechanical Analysis of Tibial Tuberosity Medialization and Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Biomechanical studies are commonly performed to evaluate the influence of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and tibial tuberosity medialization on patellar tracking and patellofemoral contact pressures. The most common method is in vitro simulation of knee function, but computational simulation of knee function and computational reconstruction of in vivo motion can also be utilized. The current review of the biomechanical literature indicates that MPFL reconstruction and tibial tuberosity medialization reduce lateral patellar tracking. Decreased lateral patellofemoral contact pressures have also been noted. For MPFL reconstruction, the most commonly noted biomechanical concerns are graft overtensioning and nonanatomic attachment on the femur leading to overconstraint of the patella and elevated medial contact pressures. For tuberosity medialization, the influence of altered tibiofemoral kinematics on postoperative function is unknown. Future biomechanical studies should emphasize inclusion of anatomic features and tracking patterns related to patellar instability, with comparison between the surgical approaches for continued development of treatment guidelines.

Length change patterns and shape of a grafted tendon after anatomical medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction differs from that in a healthy knee

PURPOSE

Recurrent patellar dislocation is currently treated with anatomical reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), and favourable postoperative outcomes have been reported. However, it is uncertain if healthy MPFL function is restored by anatomical reconstruction. The hypothesis in this study was that stabilization of the patella following MPFL reconstruction would be improved compared with that before surgery, but that function of the grafted tendon would differ from that of a healthy MPFL. The objective was to analyse the length change patterns of the MPFL before surgery and the grafted tendon after surgery in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation treated with anatomical MPFL reconstruction.

METHODS

The subjects were 12 patients (13 knees) in whom recurrent patellar dislocation was treated with anatomical MPFL reconstruction. The length change patterns of the MPFL and reconstructed ligament were analysed at extension and flexion of the knee joint using open MRI.

RESULTS

The postoperative grafted tendon length was significantly shorter than that of the preoperative MPFL at knee extension, and significantly longer at 90° and 120° of knee flexion. The postoperative length of the grafted tendon only changed slightly from 0° to 30° of knee flexion, and then significantly decreased at flexion of 30° or more. The morphology of the grafted tendon was linear until 60° knee flexion, but became convex toward the extraarticular side at flexion of 90° or more.

CONCLUSION

The grafted tendon length at knee extension was shorter than that of the preoperative MPFL, but there was no significant difference at 30° flexion. These findings suggest that the effect of damping of the patella with a grafted tendon after MPFL reconstruction may differ from that in a healthy knee. In addition, the morphology at 60° knee flexion was improved to linear after surgery, suggesting that ligament morphology at this flexion was normalized by MPFL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: Impact of Knee Flexion Angle During Graft Fixation on Dynamic Patellofemoral Contact Pressure-A Biomechanical Study

PURPOSE

Objective evaluation of the optimal graft tension angle to fully restore patellofemoral contact pressure in reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) in comparison to the native knee.

METHODS

Twelve cadaveric knee specimens were fixed in a custom-made fixation device. A sensitive pressure film (Tekscan) was fixed in the patellofemoral joint, and patellofemoral contact pressure was assessed during a dynamic flexion movement from 0° to 90°. The MPFL was cut and measurements were repeated. Reconstruction of the MPFL was performed with the gracilis tendon subsequently fixed in the femur at 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90° of knee flexion under controlled tension (2 N). The sequence of the flexion angles was alternated. Pressure measurements were repeated after every fixation of the graft.

RESULTS

No significant differences were seen in the overall patellofemoral contact pressure compared to the native knee (P > .05). However, medial patellofemoral pressure showed a significant increased patellofemoral contact pressure after MPFL reconstruction at a knee flexion angle during graft fixation of 15° (P = .027), 45° (P = .050, P = .044), and 75° (P = .039). Moreover, proximal/distal patellofemoral contact pressure revealed a significantly reduced contact pressure at 15° (P = .003), 30° (P = .009), 45° (P = .025), 75° (P = .021), and 90° (P = .022) of flexion distal after MPFL reconstruction compared with the intact knee. Lateral patellofemoral contact pressure was significantly reduced in all performed reconstructions (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The flexion angle during graft fixation for MPFL reconstruction did not have a significant impact on the overall patellofemoral contact pressure. However, selective medial, proximal, distal, and lateral patellofemoral contact pressure was significantly altered for all reconstructions. Fixation of the MPFL graft at 60° of flexion was able to most closely restore patellofemoral contact pressure compared with the intact knee.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Based on the findings of the present study, fixation of the graft in anatomic reconstruction of the MPFL should be considered in 60° of flexion under low tension (2 N) to most closely restore patellofemoral contact pressure compared with the native knee.

An evaluation of the effectiveness of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using an anatomical tunnel site

PURPOSE

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability has gained popularity, and anatomical and biomechanical studies have recently altered our operative techniques. The aim of this study was to report the clinical outcome of this new anatomical MPFL reconstructive technique and investigate whether correlating factors could be identified.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2012, a total of 31 consecutive patients underwent MPFL reconstruction using an autologous gracilis graft and anatomical tunnel placement. Pre- and post-operative data were collected as a part of routine clinical practice. The preoperative assessment included a rotational profile CT scan of the lower extremity according to the Lyon protocol with TT-TG distance measurement. Outcomes were evaluated with the Kujala and Norwich patella instability (NPI) scores preoperatively and at follow-up (1.5-5.1 years).

RESULTS

A significant improvement in both the Kujala (p < 0.001) and NPI (p = 0.012) scores was recorded. A medium and large negative correlations were found between TT-TG distance and Kujala score improvement (ρ = -0.48, p = 0.020) and NPI score improvement (ρ = -0.83, p = 0.042), respectively. Multiple regression analysis identified TT-TG distance, Beighton score and BMI as factors explaining the variance of Kujala score improvement.

CONCLUSION

Anatomical MPFL reconstruction with the gracilis autograft for patellar instability resulted in good outcome. This underlines the importance of anatomical tunnel placement in MPFL reconstruction. With a precise preoperative work-up, factors can be identified that may guide selecting the optimal operative strategy and improve counselling of the patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series, Level IV.

Anthropometric and Skeletal Parameters Predict 2-Strand Semitendinosus Tendon Size in Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

Few studies have examined whether skeletal parameters predict hamstring graft size during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Purpose/Hypothesis:

The purpose of this study was to examine whether preoperative anthropometric and radiographic skeletal parameters could predict hamstring graft size during ACLR. We hypothesized that both anthropometric and skeletal parameters can be used to predict graft size in our double-bundle procedure and that the use of skeletal parameters will improve the accuracy of graft size prediction.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A total of 200 patients were recruited and underwent double-bundle ACLR using a semitendinosus (ST) graft. The harvested tendon was measured to determine graft length (GL) and then split at its midpoint. The graft diameters of the anteromedial (GD_AM) and posterolateral bundles (GD_PL) were measured at the femoral aspect of the 2-stranded graft. The mean diameters of both bundles were included in the analysis. On the coronal radiograph, femorotibial angle (FTA), femoral interepicondylar distance (IED), and tibial plateau width (coronal tibial width [CTW]) were measured. Blumensaat line length (BLL) and the lateral tibial width (LTW) were measured on the lateral radiograph. A linear regression analysis was conducted using graft size as the dependent variable and age, sex, height, weight, Tegner activity score, and skeletal parameters as the independent variables.

Results:

Mean GL was 258.9 ± 21.9 mm, GD_AM was 5.9 ± 0.5 mm, and GD_PL was 5.7 ± 0.6 mm. Single regression analysis showed that GL was significantly predicted by sex, height, weight, Tegner activity score, IED, CTW, BLL, and LTW (R² range, 0.033-0.342). GD was predicted by sex, height, weight, IED, CTW, BLL, and LTW (R² range, 0.094-0.207). Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis significantly confirmed sex, height, and age as the variables to comprehensively predict GL (R² = 0.384). With regard to GD, stepwise multiple regression confirmed height and IED as significant variables (R² = 0.224).

Conclusion:

Both preoperative anthropometric and radiographic parameters on plain radiographs were able to predict harvested GL and 2-strand GD. Multivariate regression slightly improved the prediction of graft dimensions compared with univariate regression.