Acromioclavicular joint augmentation at the time of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction fails to improve functional outcomes despite significantly improved horizontal stability

Double figure of eight technique using fiber tape for acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocations - Reconstruction technique

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are not uncommon injuries. High-grade dislocations can be managed by arthroscopic as well as open techniques, but the most important thing is to address both vertical and horizontal stability. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional outcome of a cost effective double figure of eight technique of stabilizing both coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments in acute high-grade disruption (Type IIIB -VI) using fibre tape. This study was performed at our tertiary care centre from 2017 to 2020 after appropriate IRB approval and patient consent. Out of 134 cases, 23 high-grade AC joint disruptions treated with our technique were included in the study. Demographic data analysis, pre-op and post-op Constant score and UCLA scoring were done to assess the functional outcome; Coracoclavicular distance (CCD) and CCD ratio were used to assess the radiological outcome. Significant improvement in Constant and UCLA shoulder scores were observed from pre-op to final follow up. With respect to the radiological outcome, all cases had a significant improvement in CCD and CCD ratio from baseline to final follow-up. To conclude, our double figure of eight technique is more anatomical, addresses both vertical and horizontal stability, easily reproducible, cost-effective and safe technique.

Risk factors of loss of reduction after acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with a hook plate

BACKGROUND

Acromioclavicular joint fixation using a hook plate is effective for the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. However, several studies have reported some complications including loss of reduction after surgery for acromioclavicular joint dislocation. This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with the loss of reduction after acromioclavicular joint dislocation surgery using a hook plate.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study that assessed 118 patients with acromioclavicular joint dislocation, who were diagnosed between March 2013 and January 2019 and underwent surgical treatment using the hook plate (reduction loss group: n = 38; maintenance group: n = 80). The mean follow-up period was 29.9 months (range, 24-40 months). We assessed the range of motion, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), visual analog scale score for pain, and a subjective shoulder value. Radiological assessment of coracoid clavicular distance was performed. The risk factors of reduction loss were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Age (p = 0.049), sex (female, p = 0.03, odds ratio OR = 4.81), Rockwood type V (p = 0.049, OR = 2.20), and time from injury to surgery > 7 days (p = 0.018, OR = 2.59) were statistically significant factors in the reduction loss group. There were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes for range of motion, ASES, subjective shoulder value, and visual analog scale scores between the two groups. In the radiological results, preoperative coracoid clavicular distance (p = 0.039) and ratio (p = 0.001), and over-reduction (p = 0.023, OR = 0.40) were significantly different between the two groups. The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the female sex (p = 0.037, OR = 5.88), a time from injury to surgery > 7 days (p = 0.019, OR = 3.36), and the preoperative coracoid clavicular displacement ratio of the injured shoulder (p < 0.001, OR = 1.03) as risk factors associated with reduction loss following surgery using a hook plate for acromioclavicular dislocation.

CONCLUSION

A delayed timing of surgery > 7 days, preoperative coracoid clavicular displacement ratio of the injured shoulder, and female sex were identified as risk factors for loss of reduction after surgery using a hook plate for acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; retrospective comparison; treatment study.

Deltotrapezial Stabilization of Acromioclavicular Joint Rotational Stability: A Biomechanical Evaluation

Background

Despite advances in surgical management of acromioclavicular (AC) joint reconstruction, many patients fail to maintain sustained anatomic reduction postoperatively.

Purpose

To determine the biomechanical support of the deltoid and trapezius on AC joint stability, focusing on the rotational stability provided by the muscles to posterior and anterior clavicular rotation. A novel technique was attempted to repair the deltoid and trapezius anatomically.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

Twelve human cadaveric shoulders (mean ± SD age, 60.25 ± 10.25 years) underwent servohydraulic testing. Shoulders were randomly assigned to undergo serial defects to either the deltoid or trapezius surrounding the AC joint capsule, followed by a combined deltotrapezial muscle defect. Deltotrapezial defects were repaired with an all-suture anchor using an anatomic technique. The torque (N·m) required to rotate the clavicle 20° anterior and 20° posterior was recorded for the following conditions: intact (native), deltoid defect, trapezius defect, combined deltotrapezial defect, and repair.

Results

When compared with the native condition, the deltoid defect decreased the torque required to rotate the clavicle 20° posteriorly by 7.1% (P = .206) and 20° anteriorly by 6.1% (P = .002); the trapezial defect decreased the amount of rotational torque posteriorly by 5.3% (P = .079) and anteriorly by 4.9% (P = .032); and the combined deltotrapezial defect decreased the amount of rotational torque posteriorly by 9.9% (P = .002) and anteriorly by 9.4% (P < .001). Anatomic deltotrapezial repair increased posterior rotational torque by 5.3% posteriorly as compared with the combined deltotrapezial defect (P = .001) but failed to increase anterior rotational torque (P > .999). The rotational torque of the repair was significantly lower than the native joint in the posterior (P = .017) and anterior (P < .001) directions.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that the deltoid and trapezius play a role in clavicular rotational stabilization. The proposed anatomic repair improved posterior rotational stability but did not improve anterior rotational stability as compared with the combined deltotrapezial defect; however, neither was restored to native stability.

Clinical Relevance

Traumatic or iatrogenic damage to the deltotrapezial fascia and the inability to restore anatomic deltotrapezial attachments to the acromioclavicular joint may contribute to rotational instability. Limiting damage and improving the repair of these muscles should be a consideration during AC reconstruction.

Clinical and anatomical outcomes of isolated coracoclavicular fixation after acromioclavicular joint injury: is it stable enough or is additional horizontal fixation necessary?

Background

Recently, an emphasis has been put on anatomical reduction of acromioclavicular (AC) joint both in vertical and hortizontal planes for management of AC joint injuries due to persisting horizontal instability. Therefore, an additional AC fixation in horizontal plane has been recommended. However, relation between horizontal AC joint instability and clinical outcomes is still controversial. This study aims to evaluate outcomes of isolated coraco-clavicular fixation using arthroscopic assisted single coraco-clavicular tunnel technique in grade III and V AC joint injuries and to investigate the correlation between anatomical and clinical outcomes.

Methods

This study was conducted with 19 patients with grade III or V AC joint injury. Clinical outcomes included postoperative pain intensity and functional outcomes (Constant Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Subjective Shoulder Value). Radiological evaluations were performed using radiographs and postoperative computed tomography scans. Degree of initial injury and postoperative stability both on axial and coronal planes were evaluated after radiological assessment. Correlations between anatomical and clinical outcomes were investigated using Pearson's correlation test.

Results

At the final follow-up assessment, the mean pain score was 1.8 ± 1.8, mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 81.0 ± 15.4, mean Subjective Shoulder Value was 81.3 ± 19.6, and mean Constant Score was 86.3 ± 14.8. The mean loosening ratio and AC distance were 43.5 ± 30.6% and 4.3 ± 12.4 mm, respectively. No correlation was observed between postoperative anatomical and clinical outcomes (P > .05).

Conclusion

Additional AC fixation on horizontal plane is not a prerequisite for all injuries, there is no significant association between horizontal instability and clinical outcomes and indications of an additional AC fixation needs to be determined.

Horizontal instability after acromioclavicular joint reduction using the two-hole technique is preferred over the loop technique: a single-blind randomized clinical trial

Background

Most acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries are caused by direct trauma to the shoulders, and various methods and techniques are used to treat them; however, none of the options can be considered the gold standard. This study examines the horizontal stability of the ACJ after a complete dislocation was repaired using one of two Ethibond suture techniques, the loop technique and the two holes in the clavicle technique.

Methods

In this single-blind, randomized clinical trial, 104 patients diagnosed with complete ACJ dislocation type V were treated using Ethibond sutures with either the loop technique or the two holes in the clavicle technique. Horizontal changes in the ACJ were radiographically assessed in the lateral axial view, and shoulder function was evaluated by the Constant (CS) and Taft (TS) scores at intervals of 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.

Results

The horizontal stability of the ACJ was better with the two-hole technique than the loop technique at all measurement times. CS and TS changes showed a significant upward trend over time with both techniques. The mean CS and TS at the final visit were 95.2 and 11.6 with the loop technique and 94.0 and 11.9 with the two-hole technique, respectively. The incidence of superficial infections caused by the subcutaneous pins was the same in the two groups.

Conclusions

Due to the improved ACJ stability with the two-hole technique, it appears to be a more suitable option than the loop technique for AC joint reduction.

The Role of the Trapezius in Stabilization of the Acromioclavicular Joint: A Biomechanical Evaluation

Background

Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries are common, and many are adequately treated nonoperatively. Biomechanical studies have mainly focused on static ligamentous stabilizers. Few studies have quantified ACJ stabilization provided by the trapezius.

Purpose/Hypothesis

To elucidate the stabilization provided by the trapezius to the ACJ during scapular internal and external rotation (protraction and retraction). It was hypothesized that sequential trapezial resection would result in increasing ACJ instability.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

A biomechanical approach was pursued, with 10 cadaveric shoulders with the trapezius anatomically force loaded to normal. The trapezius was then serially transected over 8 trials, which alternated between clavicular defects (CD) and scapular defects (SD); each sequential defect consisted of 25% of the clavicular or scapular trapezial attachment. After each defect, specimens were tested with angle-controlled scapular internal and external rotation (12°) with rotary torque measurements to evaluate ACJ stability.

Results

The mean resistance in rotary torque for 12° of scapular internal rotation (protraction) with native specimens was 7.0 ± 2.0 N·m. Overall, internal rotation demonstrated a significant decrease in ACJ stability with trapezial injury (P < .001). Eight sequential defects resulted in the following significant percentage decreases in rotary torque from native internal rotation: 1.5% (25% CD; 0% SD), 5.6% (25% CD; 25% SD), 5.1% (50% CD; 25% SD), 6.5% (50% CD; 50% SD), 3.8% (75% CD; 50% SD), 7.1% (75% CD; 75% SD), 6.7% (100% CD; 75% SD), and 12.3% (100% CD 100% SD) (P < .001). The mean resistance in rotary torque for 12° of scapular external rotation (retraction) with native specimens was 7.1 ± 1.7 N·m. External rotation did not demonstrate a significant decrease in ACJ stability with trapezial injury (P = .596). The 8 sequential defects resulted in decreases in rotary torque from native external rotation of 0%, 3.8%, 4.0%, 3.2%, 3.5%, 3.4%, 4.2%, and 0.7%.

Conclusion

Trapezial injury resulted in increased instability in the setting of scapular internal rotation (protraction) of the ACJ.

Clinical Relevance

These findings validate the inclusion of deltotrapezial fascial injury consideration in the modified Rockwood classification system. Repair of the trapezial insertion on the ACJ may provide improved outcomes in the setting of ACJ reconstruction.

Differences between Coracoclavicular, Acromioclavicular, or Combined Reconstruction Techniques on the Kinematics of the Shoulder Girdle

BACKGROUND

Although the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments are classically reconstructed after acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries, biomechanical studies over the past decade have indicated the importance of an additional reconstruction of the AC ligaments. To date, no kinematic study has investigated the kinematic differences between these reconstruction strategies.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the restoration of shoulder motion after an AC injury using a CC ligament, an AC ligament, or a combined reconstruction technique.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

After creating a Rockwood grade V lesion in 14 cadaveric shoulders, the AC joint injury was treated with either a CC ligament reconstruction using a suspension device, an in situ AC ligament reconstruction using 2 coupled soft tissue anchors, or a combination of these 2 techniques. Joint motions were registered during humerothoracic elevation in the coronal plane and protraction in the intact shoulder in a Rockwood V lesion and after the 3 reconstruction strategies. An optical navigation system measured 3-dimensional rotation in the sternoclavicular and scapulothoracic joints, and both rotation and translation were analyzed in the AC joint.

RESULTS

In the sternoclavicular joint, the CC and combined reconstruction techniques adequately restored clavicular axial rotation, while the AC reconstruction technique showed a better correction of clavicular elevation. Scapulothoracic joint rotations were best restored by reconstructing the AC ligaments. In the AC joint, the relative tilting position and the lateral rotation of the scapula compared with the clavicle were best restored by the suspension device and combined reconstruction. The AC ligament reconstruction technique demonstrated a better restoration of the relative protracted position and resulted in a better correction of the translation of the scapula relative to the clavicle.

CONCLUSION

This study illustrates that there are kinematic differences between AC, CC, or combined ligament reconstruction strategies. Although each technique was able to restore different elements of the joint kinematics, none of the strategies completely restored the shoulder girdle to its preinjured state.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Humerothoracic movements after Rockwood V lesions are best restored using the CC reconstruction technique, and scapulothoracic movements are best restored using the AC ligament reconstruction technique.

The Morphology of the Acromioclavicular Joint Does Not Influence the Postoperative Outcome Following Acute Stabilization—A Case Series of 81 Patients

Purpose

To specifically evaluate the influence of the acromioclavicular (AC)-joint morphology on the outcome after arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular (CC) stabilization surgery with suspensory fixation systems and to investigate whether an additional open AC-joint reduction and AC cerclage improves the clinical outcome for patients with certain morphologic AC-joint subtypes.

Methods

Patients with an acute acromioclavicular joint injury, who underwent arthroscopically assisted CC stabilization with suspensory fixation systems with or without concomitant AC cerclage between January 2009 and June 2017 were identified and included in this retrospective cohort analysis. AC-joint morphology was assessed on preoperative radiographs and categorized as “flat” or “non-flat” (“oblique”/“curved”) subtypes. After a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, postoperative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain were collected. A subgroup analysis of clinical outcomes depending on the surgical technique and morphological subtype of the AC joint was performed.

Results

Eighty-one patients (95% male, mean age 35 ± 12 years) could be included at a mean follow-up of 57 ± 14 months. Radiographic assessment of AC-joint morphology showed 24 (30%) cases of flat type, 38 (47%) cases of curved type, and 19 (23%) cases of oblique morphology. Postoperatively, no clinically significant difference could be detected after the treatment of AC joint injury via CC stabilization with or without concomitant AC cerclage (VAS_rest: P = .067; VAS_max: P = .144, ASES: P = .548; SANE: P = .045). No clinically significant differences were found between the surgical techniques for the flat morphologic subtype (VAS_rest: P = .820; VAS_max: P = .251; SANE: P = .104; ASES: P = .343) or the non-flat subtype (VAS_res: P = .021; VAS_max: P = .488; SANE: P = .243, ASES: P = .843).

Conclusions

In arthroscopically assisted AC stabilization surgery with suspensory fixation systems for acute AC-joint injury, the AC-joint morphology did not influence the postoperative outcome, independent of the surgical technique. No clinical benefit of performing an additional horizontal stabilization could be detected in our collective at mid-term follow-up.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury?

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether heterotopic ossification (HO) in the coracoclavicular (CC) space after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injury is a complication or a sign of good prognosis.

Methods

Fifty-nine consecutive patients who underwent CC reconstruction with or without augmentation of the ACJ for acute ACJ injuries were analyzed. Postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score (CS), subjective shoulder value (SSV), and visual analog scale (VAS) results were evaluated. For radiological evaluation, HO was evaluated, and CC distances were measured.

Results

Fifty-one patients (11 women and 40 men; mean age, 36 years [range, 17-68 years]) were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 3 years (range, 2-8 years). The mean ASES score at the follow-up was 82.73 (range, 51.6-100), mean CS was 85 (range, 50-100), mean SSV was 80 (range, 40-100), and mean VAS was 1.9 (range, 0-5). It was observed that the clinical outcomes (ASES, CS, SSV, VAS) of patients who developed ossification in the CC space were better than those who did not although it was not statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were found in the clinical outcomes (ASES, CS, SSV, VAS) between patients who underwent CC reconstruction without augmentation of the ACJ and those who were combined (P > .05).

Conclusion

HO in the CC space is a common finding following AC joint fixation injury. We suggest that HO is not a complication and might possibly have positive effects on clinical outcomes.

Anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) using free tendon allograft is effective for chronic acromioclavicular joint injuries at mid-term follow-up

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) using free tendon allografts for the treatment of chronic acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries with a minimum 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ACCR for chronic ACJ injuries between 2003 and 2017 were analyzed. Clinical outcome measures included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant-Murley (CM), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) scores. Radiographic loss of reduction during follow-up was evaluated by calculating the difference (mm) in the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) of the involved side immediately postoperatively and at terminal follow-up.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients (mean age: 42.7 ± 12.8 years) were included in the study with an average follow-up of 3.8 ± 3.1 years (range: 1.1-11.5 years). Patients achieved significant improvement in ASES (50.2 ± 20.1 pre to 85.2 ± 16.3 post), CM (60.2 ± 18.5 pre to 88.2 ± 9.1 post), SST (6.1 ± 3.2 pre to 9.5 ± 3.7 post), and SANE (24.0 ± 25.7 pre to 89.0 ± 12.7 post) scores (P < 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in functional improvement when comparing type III and V injuries (n.s.). Mean increase in CCD of the involved side from immediately postoperative to final radiographic follow-up was 4.1 ± 3.9 mm, with no significant correlation to clinical outcomes scores. Complications occurred in 33.3% of cases, with postoperative heterotopic ossification being most frequent (14.3%).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing ACCR using free tendon allografts for chronic ACJ injuries achieved significant improvement in shoulder function at a mean follow-up of 3.8 years. No correlation was observed between the amount of loss of reduction and clinical outcome scores. Free tendon allografts may be a reliable alternative to autografts in the treatment of chronic ACJ dislocations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Long-term stability of coracoclavicular suture fixation for acute acromioclavicular joint separation

PURPOSE

The optimal (SBJI) surgical treatment for acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint disruption remains controversial. What is being presented is the long-term functional outcomes of a double cross-looped coracoclavicular (CC) suture technique with the intention of restoring both anteroposterior and superior displacement of the clavicle.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2016, 81 patients underwent surgical reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular joint (AC) disruption in two orthopaedic centers. Two patients died for reasons unrelated to the treatment, and seven missed the final follow-up appointment, leaving 72 patients (67 males; 5 females; age 37 ± 12.4; range 15-64 years) for clinical and radiological assessments. All cases were classified according to the Rockwood classification as type III (n = 34), IV (n = 14) or V (n = 24). The dislocation was repaired with double cross-looped CC fixation using four Ethibond sutures passing underneath the coracoid and through a 4.5 mm drill hole in the clavicle in opposing directions to control both anteroposterior and vertical displacement. Radiological investigation preoperatively and at the last follow-up included anteroposterior and/or Zanca views, axillary or Alexander views, and comparative stress radiography of both AC joints. Patients were evaluated clinically with the Constant-Murley score (CMS) and Acromio Clavicular Joint Instability Score (ACJIS). Loss of reduction, subluxation, CC ligament ossification, post-traumatic arthritis, and peri-implant fractures were also recorded.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were available for the last clinical and radiological evaluations. At a median follow-up period of 6.3 ± 2.1 years (range 3-12 years), the CMS and ACJIS were 92.1 ± 7.2 (range 60-100 points) and 90.4 ± 8.6 (range 45-100 points), respectively. Complications included 9 (12.5%) patients with slight loss of reduction, 2 (1.7%) with dislocation recurrence, 1 (1.3%) with superficial infection, 1 (1.3%) with a fracture of the lateral end of the clavicle, and 2 (1.7%) with persistent tenderness in the AC joint. The incidence of periarticular ossification was 22.4% and did not affect the final outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique represents an effective and low-cost treatment for acute AC joint separations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Quantitative and Qualitative Surgical Anatomy of the Acromioclavicular Joint Capsule and Ligament: A Cadaveric Study

BACKGROUND

The acromioclavicular (AC) capsule and ligament have been found to play a major role in maintaining horizontal stability. To reconstruct the AC capsule and ligament, precise knowledge of their anatomy is essential.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the angle of the posterosuperior ligament in regard to the axis of the clavicle, (2) to determine the width of the attachment (footprint) of the AC capsule and ligament on the acromion and clavicle, (3) to determine the distance to the AC capsule from the cartilage border of the acromion and clavicle, and (4) to develop a clockface model of the insertion of the posterosuperior ligament on the acromion and clavicle. It was hypothesized that consistent angles, attachment areas, distances, and insertion sites would be identified.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 12 fresh-frozen shoulders were used (mean age, 55 years [range, 41-64 years]). All soft tissue was removed, leaving only the AC capsule and ligament intact. After a qualitative inspection, a quantitative assessment was performed. The AC joint was fixed in an anatomic position, and the attachment angle of the posterosuperior ligament was measured using a digital protractor. The capsule and ligament were removed, and a coordinate measuring device was utilized to assess the width of the AC capsule footprint and the distance from the footprint to the cartilage border of the acromion and clavicle. The AC joint was then disarticulated, and the previously marked posterosuperior ligament insertion was transferred into a clockface model. The mean values across the 12 specimens were demonstrated with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

The mean attachment angle of the posterosuperior ligament was 51.4° (95% CI, 45.2°-57.6°) in relation to the long axis of the entire clavicle and 41.5° (95% CI, 33.8°-49.1°) in relation to the long axis of the distal third of the clavicle. The mean clavicular footprint width of the AC capsule was 6.4 mm (95% CI, 5.8-6.9 mm) at the superior clavicle and 4.4 mm (95% CI, 3.9-4.8 mm) at the inferior clavicle. The mean acromial footprint width of the AC capsule was 4.6 mm (95% CI, 4.2-4.9 mm) at the superior side and 4.0 mm (95% CI, 3.6-4.4 mm) at the inferior side. The mean distance from the lateral clavicular attachment of the AC capsule to the clavicular cartilage border was 4.3 mm (95% CI, 4.0-4.6 mm), and the mean distance from the medial acromial attachment of the AC capsule to the acromial cartilage border was 3.1 mm (95% CI, 2.9-3.4 mm). On the clockface model of the right shoulder, the clavicular attachment of the posterosuperior ligament ranged from the 9:05 (range, 8:00-9:30) to 11:20 (range, 10:00-12:30) position, and the acromial attachment ranged from the 12:20 (range, 11:00-1:30) to 2:10 (range, 13:30-14:40) position.

CONCLUSION

The finding that the posterosuperior ligament did not course perpendicular to the AC joint but rather was oriented obliquely to the long axis of the clavicle, in combination with the newly developed clockface model, may help surgeons to optimally reconstruct this ligament.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our results of a narrow inferior footprint and a short distance from the inferior AC capsule to cartilage suggest that proposed reconstruction of the AC joint capsule should focus primarily on its superior portion.

Nonanatomic and Suture-Based Coracoclavicular Joint Stabilization Techniques Provide Adequate Stability at a Lower Cost of Implants in Biomechanical Studies When Compared With Anatomic Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

To compare the stability and cost of the used implants in nonanatomic and anatomic acromioclavicular joint repair/reconstruction (ACCR) techniques tested in cadaveric shoulder biomechanical studies during the last decade.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and prospectively registered in PROSPERO. Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, and Virtual Health Library databases. Studies evaluating 3-direction stability under 70-N loads and load-to-failure protocols with servohydraulic testing systems were included. A meta-analysis of the mean differences of anterior, posterior, and superior direction; relative stability value in 3 directions; superior direction load-to-failure; stability/cost index; and load-to-failure/cost index was performed using a continuous random-effects model and 95% confidence interval.

Results

Eighteen articles were included. Both non-ACCR and ACCR techniques exceeded the minimum acceptable threshold of stability and load-to-failure. ACCR techniques were biomechanically better in terms of anterior stability (P = .04) and relative stability value (mean difference 64.08%, P = .015). However, supraphysiological stability and failure loads were achieved with non-ACCR techniques at a lower cost of implants. Techniques combining 2 clavicular tunnels separated by at least 10 mm, a mean of 2 sutures, and/or suture tapes had the greatest stability/cost index and load-to-failure/cost index among the included techniques (confidence interval 99%).

Conclusions

Non-ACCR and ACCR techniques exceeded the minimum acceptable threshold of stability and failure loads in controlled biomechanical testing. However, non-ACCR and techniques combining 2 clavicular tunnels separated by at least 10 mm, a mean of 2 sutures, and/or suture tapes provide supraphysiologic stability and failure loads at a lower cost of implants.

Clinical Relevance

Non-ACCR and suture-based techniques may provide more cost-effective and greater value treatment for acromioclavicular joint injury and could be considered in the surgical management of normal activity individuals and cost-sensitive populations.

Treatment of a Failed Type V Acromioclavicular Separation Due to Coracoid Fracture: Revision of Acromioclavicular-Coracoclavicular Reconstruction and Coracoid Fixation

Acromioclavicular (AC) injuries are common, especially in the young and active population. AC joint dislocations account for 8% of all joint dislocations and are even more common in contact sports. These injuries are graded as type I through type VI on the basis of the Rockwood classification method. Types I and II are generally treated without surgery whereas types IV, V, and VI are best treated operatively. Type III dislocations remain controversial in terms of treatment, and many surgeons recommend nonoperative treatment first and operative treatment in case of continued symptoms such as pain, instability, or shoulder girdle dysfunction. The goal of operative treatment is to restore AC joint stability, which involves addressing both the coracoclavicular and coracoacromial ligaments to achieve a desirable patient outcome. The objective of this Technical Note is to describe our technique for management of a failed acromioclavicular stabilization, treated with a coracoclavicular and AC joint capsular reconstruction using tibialis anterior and semitendinosus allografts.

Combined Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction with Allograft Using a Cerclage Tensioning System

Acromioclavicular joint separations are common shoulder injuries, yet standard treatment practices vary. Popular surgical techniques include reconstruction using allografts or neighboring ligaments as well as repair using screws and sutures. This Technical Note and accompanying video describe both an acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular joint reconstruction using an allograft to replace native acromioclavicular ligament along with an AC joint reduction using a Suture Cerclage System to precisely control reduction and restore anatomic alignment.

Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: Repair Through Suture Anchors for Coracoclavicular Ligament and Nonabsorbable Suture Fixation for Acromioclavicular Joint

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing coracoclavicular (CC) ligament repair by two suture anchors and acromioclavicular (AC) joint (ACJ) fixation using heavy nonabsorbable sutures for the treatment of types III-V ACJ injuries with a minimum of 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

The clinical and radiographic outcomes of 36 consecutive patients (26 men and 10 women) who underwent anatomic reduction for acute ACJ dislocation using two suture anchors for CC ligament reconstruction and two strands of non-absorbable stitches for ACJ fixation between December 2013 and December 2018 were reviewed. Two 3.5 mm suture anchors with double-loaded sutures were separately inserted into the anterolateral and posteromedial portions of the coracoid process. The suture strands were passed through the hole created in the clavicle using 2.0 mm drill and tied over the clavicle. Additional ACJ augmentation using two strands of non-absorbable heavy sutures was performed in all patients. At 3, 6, and 12 months and last follow-up visit, the scores on the visual analog scale (VAS), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant-Murley score, and simple shoulder test (SST) questionnaires were used to provide a final evaluation of shoulder function. Comparison between baseline and treatment results was performed. Radiographic analysis included vertical displacement and horizontal shift.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients (20 men and nine women) were included in the study. A total of seven, six, and 16 patients had Rockwood type III, type IV, and type V ACJ dislocations, respectively. The mean patient age was 42.8 ± 13.5 years, with a mean follow-up of 28 months (range, 12-56 months). At the 12-month follow-up, the mean ASES score was 92.1 ± 3.5, with a mean pain score of 0.5 ± 0.7 on the VAS and mean Constant-Murley score of 93.0 ± 2.4. The new number of positive answers on the SST was 11.5 ± 0.6. Compared with the baseline, the clinical results improved significantly (P < 0.05). No significant difference could be found between the 6- and 12-month follow-up evaluations (P > 0.05). Radiographs showed two partial loss of reduction, whereas no horizontal displacement was found in all patients. One patient developed a superficial wound infection 3 weeks postoperation. The wound healed after routine wound care. No neurovascular complications were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

CC ligament reconstruction using two suture anchors and ACJ augmentation using two strands of non-absorbable heavy sutures on high-grade AC dislocation is a reliable technique for restoring stability to the ACJ and can obtain good to excellent clinical results.

Minimum 10-Year Outcomes After Revision Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Instability

Background:

Revision surgery in cases of previously failed primary acromioclavicular (AC) joint stabilization remains challenging mainly because of anatomic alterations or technical difficulties. However, anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) has been shown to achieve encouraging biomechanical, clinical, and radiographic short-term to midterm results.

Purpose:

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic long-term outcomes of patients undergoing revision ACCR after failed operative treatment for type III through V AC joint injuries with a minimum 10-year follow-up.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

A retrospective chart review was performed on prospectively collected data within an institutional shoulder registry. Patients who underwent revision ACCR for type III through V AC joint injuries between January 2003 and December 2009 were analyzed. Clinical outcome measures included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). The coracoclavicular distance (CCD) was measured for radiographic analysis immediately postoperatively and at last postoperative follow-up.

Results:

A total of 8 patients with a mean age at the time of surgery of 44.6 ± 10.6 years and a mean follow-up of 135.0 ± 17.4 months (range, 120-167 months) were eligible for inclusion in the study. The time from initial AC joint stabilization until revision surgery was 10.2 ± 12.4 months (range, 0.5-36 months); 62.5% of the patients had undergone more than 2 previous AC joint surgical procedures. The ASES score improved from 43.9 ± 22.4 preoperatively to 80.6 ± 28.8 postoperatively (P = .012), the SST score improved from 4.4 ± 3.6 preoperatively to 11.0 ± 2.2 postoperatively (P = .017), and the SANE score improved from 31.4 ± 27.3 preoperatively to 86.9 ± 24.1 postoperatively (P = .018) at final follow-up. There was no significant difference in the CCD (P = .08) between the first (7.6 ± 3.0 mm) and final (10.6 ± 2.8 mm) radiographic follow-up (mean, 50.5 ± 32.7 months [range, 18-98 months]).

Conclusion:

Patients undergoing revision ACCR after failed operative treatment for type III through V AC joint injuries maintained significant improvement in clinical outcomes at a minimum 10-year follow-up.

Synthetic coracoclavicular ligament vs. coracoclavicular suspensory construct for treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation: a biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

A synthetic ligament (LockDown, Worcestershire, England) has become available to treat complete acromioclavicular dislocation with promising clinical results and potential benefit to avoid postoperative loss of reduction. We investigated the biomechanics of this synthetic ligament in a simulated immediate postoperative rehabilitation setting, hypothesizing that the synthetic ligament would demonstrate less superior coracoclavicular displacement to cyclic loading and higher ultimate load-to-failure values than a coracoclavicular suspensory construct.

METHODS

Seven matched-pair cadaveric shoulders (mean age at time of death, 79 years) were loaded cyclically and to failure. One specimen in each pair was randomly assigned to the synthetic ligament or coracoclavicular suspensory construct. Superiorly directed 70-N cyclic loading for 3000 cycles at 1.0 Hz was applied through the clavicle in a fixed scapula simulating physiologic states during immediate postoperative rehabilitation, followed by a load-to-failure test at 120 mm/min.

RESULTS

After 3000 cycles, the superior displacement of the clavicle in the synthetic ligament (9.2 ± 1.1 mm) was 225% greater than in the coracoclavicular suspensory construct (2.8 ± 0.4 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.4, 8.3; P < .001). Average stiffness of the synthetic ligament (32.8 N/mm) was 60% lower than that of the coracoclavicular suspensory construct (81.9 N/mm, 95% CI 43.3, 54.9; P < .001). Ultimate load-to-failure of the synthetic ligament was 23% (95% CI 37.9, 301.5; P = .016) lower than the coracoclavicular suspensory construct (580.5 ± 85.1 N and 750.2 ± 135.5 N, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In a simulated immediate postoperative cadaveric model, the synthetic ligament demonstrated poorer biomechanics than the coracoclavicular suspensory construct. These findings suggest that a coracoclavicular suspensory construct may be preferable to a synthetic ligament if early rehabilitation is intended.

Optimal Management of Acromioclavicular Dislocation: Current Perspectives

Injuries to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint are common and mostly involve younger, male individuals. Whereas the majority of AC joint dislocations can be treated nonoperatively with a trial of immobilization, pain medication, cryotherapy, and physiotherapy, there are patients that do not respond well to conservative management and may require surgical treatment. Identifying and treating these patients according to the type and chronicity of AC joint dislocation is paramount. To date, a myriad of surgical techniques have been proposed to address unstable AC joint dislocations and are indicative of the uncertainty that exists in optimal management of these injuries. Historically research has focused on the restoration of the coracoclavicular ligament complex. However, recently the importance of the acromioclavicular capsule and ligaments has been emphasized. This review aims to provide the reader with an overview of current treatment strategies and research, as well as future perspectives.