Patients return to sports and to work after successful treatment of septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

The effectiveness of arthroscopic irrigation and debridement in the management of septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the e!ectiveness of arthroscopic irrigation and debridement in the management of septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R), with a focus on graft retention rates, functional outcomes, and the microbiological profile of infections.

Methods

This meta-analysis adhered to PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024562550). PubMed, Cochrane, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect databases were searched for studies published before July 2024 using predefined Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords related to ACL-R infections and arthroscopic irrigation and debridement. Inclusion criteria followed the PICO framework: Population (patients with septic arthritis following ACL-R), intervention (arthroscopic irrigation and debridement), comparator (none), and outcomes (graft retention rate, Lysholm Knee Score, International Knee Documentation Committee [IKD] score, and Tegner Activity Scale [TAS], and microbiology data). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions. Meta-analyses were performed using R Studio, with results presented as pooled proportions or means with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results

A total of 20 studies involving 333 patients were analyzed, with follow-up periods ranging from 18 days to 67 months. The pooled graft retention rate was 92% (95% CI [88-94%]), confirmed by proportional meta-analysis with low heterogeneity (I"=0%, P=2.0948). Functional knee outcomes showed pooled mean scores of 82.41 for Lysholm (95% CI [78.15-86.66], I"=87.3%-92.7%), 79.37 for IKDC (95% CI [74.00-84.75], I"=68.3%-82.2%), and 5.08 for TAS (95% CI [4.87-5.30], I"=0%-52.6%), indicating moderate to satisfactory recovery. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (42.34%) and Staphylococcus aureus (23.12%) were the most frequently isolated pathogens, with 9.91% of cases involving antibiotic-resistant strains, including MRSA (4.50%) and MR-CNS (5.41%). Cephalosporin or vancomycin was the most commonly administered first-line antibiotic, often combined with other agents.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that arthroscopic irrigation and debridement, combined with appropriate antibiotic therapy, are e!ective in managing septic arthritis following ACL-R, achieving a high graft retention rate of 92% and moderate to satisfactory functional outcomes. However, the presence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens and challenges in returning to high-level sports highlight the importance of preventive measures to protect athlete performance and recovery.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, Therapeutic Study.

Prevention and Management of Postoperative Infection After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Narrative Review

Background: Postoperative infection following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a rare yet severe complication that can compromise patient outcomes, leading to prolonged recovery, graft failure, and knee dysfunction. Although infection rates are reported to be less than 2%, it remains essential to implement strategies to reduce infection risk and improve surgical outcomes. Methods: This review explores current evidence on the prevention of infections in ACLR, emphasizing the importance of timely antibiotic prophylaxis and vancomycin presoaking of grafts, which has been associated with a substantial reduction in infection rates. Results: Empirical antibiotic therapy should be started immediately after joint aspiration when infection is suspected. Treatment must prioritize culture-specific antibiotic regimens to optimize patient outcomes. Surgical intervention with arthroscopic debridement and irrigation needs to occur as soon as the diagnosis of infection is made. Often, this is performed with a focus on retaining the graft in order to preserve knee stability, if possible. Careful intraoperative management, along with the aid of infectious disease specialists, is paramount to help optimize outcomes following infection after ACLR. Conclusions: This review emphasizes the need for treatment protocols and highlights areas for future research to establish clear guidelines on infection after ACLR, especially with decisions of graft retention versus removal.

Does septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction lead to poor outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND

Septic arthritis is a rare but devastating complication after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). While early treatment can prevent significant graft complications, outcomes are often inferior to those in uncomplicated ACLR. Furthermore, whether to retain or remove the graft after infection remains debatable. Therefore, we sought to compare the outcomes of septic arthritis post ACLR with uncomplicated ACLR and evaluate graft retention versus removal in infected patients.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in which PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Clinical studies were included if they compared patient-reported, clinician-reported, or radiographic outcomes (minimum follow-up of 12 months) between patients with post-ACLR septic arthritis and those with uncomplicated ACLR or that compared graft retention and removal in patients with post-ACLR septic arthritis.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were retrieved. Patients with post-ACLR septic arthritis reported inferior Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale scores (mean difference (MD) 7.53; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.20-11.86; P = 0.0006), Tegner Activity Scale scores (MD, 1.42; 95% CI 1.07-1.76; P < .00001), and return to sports rates (53% versus 76%, respectively) to those of patients with uncomplicated ACLR. Patients with post-ACLR septic arthritis and those with uncomplicated ACLR did not differ in terms of the pooled estimate of various clinician-reported outcomes, such as the objective International Knee Documentation Committee score, anterior-posterior laxity, pivot shift, and Lachman test results. Furthermore, no significant difference was noted between the aforementioned patient groups regarding osteoarthritis (detected radiographically). Graft retention led to better patient- and clinician-reported outcomes than graft removal.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite similar clinician-reported outcomes and osteoarthritis rates, patients with post-ACLR septic arthritis reported worse outcomes than those with uncomplicated ACLR. Graft retention leads to improved patient- and clinician-reported outcomes compared with the outcomes of graft removal. Our findings may help develop realistic expectations and management strategies for this rare complication.

Standardized treatment of infection after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Infection after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a rare and catastrophic postoperative complication. The aims of this study were to investigate the diagnostic, treatment and rehabilitation measures for postoperative infection following after ACLR. A retrospective study was conducted on 1500 patients who underwent ACLR between January 2011 and January 2022. Twenty patients who met the criteria for summarizing the incidence patterns and treatment experiences were selected for a complete investigation of their diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitation processes, as well as outpatient follow-up results. Among the 20 patients who developed postoperative infections, Staphylococcus aureus was the main pathogen (80%). The clinical manifestations mainly included fever (80%) and knee joint pain (100%). Laboratory tests demonstrated that C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were greater than 50 mmol/L in fifteen patients (75%). All of the patients received intravenous antibiotic therapy. Five patients (25%) of tendon socket infection were treated with continuous negative pressure suction irrigation, whereas the other fifteen patients with intra-articular infection were treated with arthroscopic debridement and continuous flushing. The Lysholm score of the affected knee was compared before treatment and 6 months after treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (t = 20.78, P < 0.001). The success rate of treatment was 100%, and there were no significant differences between patients who received secondary treatment and functional exercise and those who underwent ACLR in terms of knee joint function or range of motion during the same time period. Infection was rare after ACLR, however it was fatal, and the main pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus. Early diagnosis and a comprehensive treatment approach are pivotal for the successful management of postoperative infections following ACLR. The results of this study contribute valuable clinical insights for further refining surgical procedures, enhancing infection prevention measures, and optimizing rehabilitation protocols.

Outcomes of primary arthroscopic shoulder stabilization in active patients over 40-results at a mean follow-up of 7 years

Background

The purpose of this study is to report clinical outcomes, return to activity, redislocation rate, and rate of conversion to arthroplasty for active patients over age 40 undergoing primary arthroscopic shoulder stabilization.

Methods

Patients over 40 years of age who underwent arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for shoulder instability between December 2005 and January 2018 with a minimum of 2-year postoperative follow-up were enrolled in this retrospective, monocentric study. Clinical outcome scores including the 12-Item Short-Form Survey, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Single-Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and visual analog scale pain were collected. Additionally, it was determined which patients reached the minimal clinically important difference and the patient-acceptable symptom state for the ASES score. Bivariate analysis was utilized to determine if there was any association between baseline demographic and clinical factors with the outcome scores.

Results

Of a total of 814 patients assessed for eligibility, an aggregate of 40 patients were included and 33 patients (8 females) were available for follow-up. The average age was 49.4 ± 7.6 years. At an average follow-up of 7.0 ± 3.6 years, all the outcome scores significantly improved compared to baseline. These included ASES (69.9 ± 19 to 95.8 ± 7.6, P < .001); the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (29.7 ± 17.7 to 3.9 ± 5.4, P < .002); Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score (53.5 ± 29.3 to 91.6 ± 14.3, P < .003); the 12-Item Short-Form Survey (45.6 ± 8.8 to 55.2 ± 5.7, P < .001); and the visual analog scale (2.1 ± 2.1 to 0.3 ± 1, P < .002). The minimal clinically important difference was reached by 72.7% of the patients and 81.8% reached the patient-acceptable symptom state threshold for the ASES score. Postoperative shoulder stability improved substantially and significantly. Median postoperative satisfaction was 10/10 (range 1-10). Ninety-five-point-six percent of the patients returned to sport, with 91.0% of the patients able to return to preinjury level. One patient (3%) underwent revision surgery for osteoarthritis, in the form of comprehensive arthroscopic management procedure. The presence of cartilage defects cartilage defects Outerbridge grade >2 (P = .020) and posterior labral lesions (P = .03) at index surgery were significantly associated with inferior outcomes in the ASES score.

Conclusion

Active patients aged 40 years and older undergoing arthroscopic shoulder stabilization experienced favorable functional outcomes at a mean follow-up of 7 years, with low rates of revision surgery or of progression to clinically relevant osteoarthritis. However, the presence of high-grade cartilage lesions and the presence of a posterior labral tear were associated with inferior clinical outcomes.

Infection after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Narrative Review of the Literature

Infection is an uncommon side effect of arthroscopic surgery, and this percentage is higher in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery, where graft and fixation devices are used. Infections can not only lead to high re-admission rates and poor functional recovery of the knee but can also have a significant negative impact on the patient's psychological and economic health, especially in athletes, as it can affect their sports career. It is important to be aware of the many risk factors, especially the manifestation of symptoms. These may sometimes be non-specific to the infectious pathology and common to other situations, such as the presence of a significant intra-articular hematoma. Septic arthritis after ACLR can occur at any time after surgery but typically presents acutely, while late manifestation is relatively rare. Diagnosis of infection is based on patient history, physical examination, laboratory parameters, and analysis of synovial fluid after joint aspiration, which is the gold standard for diagnosing post-operative infection. Once symptoms appear and the diagnosis seems certain, it is necessary to intervene quickly with arthroscopic debridement and long-term antibiotic treatment to try to save the graft and resolve the infectious situation to avoid graft failure and arthrofibrotic sequelae. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and current treatment guidelines of septic arthritis after ACLR surgery by analyzing recent literature, in particular meta-analyses and systematic reviews.

Psychosocial interventions seem redact kinesiophobia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction but higher level of evidence is needed: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Psychosocial interventions have shown potential in reducing the fear of re-injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but this has not been systematically reviewed. The aim of this study was to assess the available evidence on the effect of psychosocial interventions on kinesiophobia after ACLR.

METHODS

Two independent researchers conducted a systematic search in the electronic databases including Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, and CINAHL from their inception until May 2022. They included studies that utilised a randomised controlled study design with a control group, and measured kinesiophobia using the Tampa Scale for kinesiophobia in patients who underwent primary ACLR. The outcome of interest was the mean and standard deviation of kinesiophobia. Extracted data were analysed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, version 3.0 (CMA.V2), employing a random-effects model to calculate the overall effect estimates of psychosocial interventions on Kinesiophobia. The standardised mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was computed based on the mean and standard deviation in each group.

RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis included 5 randomised controlled trials with a total of 213 patients who underwent ACLR. The results of the meta-analysis showed that psychosocial intervention was more effective than non-psychosocial comparators in reducing kinesiophobia among patients who underwent a primary ACLR (5 trials, MD 0.56, 95% CI 0.28-0.83, p < 0.001). The heterogeneity score was zero (I2 = 0%; n.s. for Cochran's Q test), indicating no significant variation among the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychosocial interventions can alleviate kinesiophobia in patients with primary ACLR. Although the limited number of reviewed studies and their methodological limitations precludes drawing a definitive conclusion regarding the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions on kinesiophobia, these promising findings can serve as a basis for developing psychological strategies to manage kinesiophobia in patients with primary ACLR and can also guide future research this issue.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered in PROSPERO on December 2021 (CRD42021282413).

Poorer patient-reported outcome and increased risk of revision at a 5-year follow-up among patients with septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a register-based cohort study of 23,075 primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions

PURPOSE

The primary aim of this study is to analyse the patient-reported outcomes after ACLR complicated by septic arthritis. The secondary aim is to examine the 5-year risk of revision surgery after primary ACLR complicated by septic arthritis. The hypothesis was that patients with septic arthritis after ACLR are more likely to have lower PROMs scores and an increased risk of revision, compared with patients without septic arthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All primary ACLRs, with a hamstring or patellar tendon autograft (n = 23,075), in the Swedish Knee Ligament Register (SKLR) between 2006 and 2013 were linked with data from the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare to identify patients with postoperative septic arthritis. These patients were verified in a nationwide medical records analysis and compared with patients without infection in the SKLR. The patient-reported outcome was measured using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Index Score (KOOS) and the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Index (EQ-5D) at 1, 2 and 5 years postoperatively and the 5-year risk of revision surgery was calculated.

RESULTS

There were 268 events of septic arthritis (1.2%). The mean scores on the KOOS and EQ-5D index were significantly lower for patients with septic arthritis on all subscales on all follow-up occasions compared with patients without septic arthritis. Patients with septic arthritis had a revision rate of 8.2% compared with 4.2% in patients without septic arthritis (adjusted hazard ratio 2.04; confidence interval 1.34-3.12).

CONCLUSION

Patients suffering from septic arthritis following ACLR are associated with poorer patient-reported outcomes at 1-, 2- and 5-year follow-ups compared with patients without septic arthritis. The risk of revision ACL reconstruction within 5 years of the primary operation for patients with septic arthritis following ACLR is almost twice as high, compared with patients without septic arthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

ESSKA and EBJIS recommendations for the management of infections after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R): prevention, surgical treatment and rehabilitation

PURPOSE

Infection after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is a rare but severe complication. Despite an increase in articles published on this topic over the last decade, solid data to optimized diagnostic and therapeutic measures are scarce. For this reason, the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) and the European Society for Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA) collaborated in order to develop recommendations for the diagnosis and management of infections after ACL-R. The aim of the workgroup was to perform a review of the literature and provide practical guidance to healthcare professionals involved in the management of infections after ACL-R.

METHODS

An international workgroup was recruited to provide recommendations for predefined clinical dilemmas regarding the management of infections after ACL-R. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases were searched for evidence to support the recommended answers to each dilemma.

RESULTS

The recommendations were divided into two articles. The first covers etiology, prevention, diagnosis and antimicrobial treatment of septic arthritis following ACL-R and is primarily aimed at infectious disease specialists. This article includes the second part of the recommendations and covers prevention of infections after ACL-R, surgical treatment of septic arthritis following ACL-R and subsequent postoperative rehabilitation. It is aimed not only at orthopedic surgeons, but at all healthcare professionals dealing with patients suffering from infections after ACL-R.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations guide clinicians in achieving timely and accurate diagnosis as well as providing optimal management, both of which are paramount to prevent loss of function and other devastating sequelae of infection in the knee joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Eradication and graft retention can be achieved in the treatment for acute septic arthritis after primary posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis of 1561 reconstructions

PURPOSE

Acute septic arthritis after arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction is a rare but severe complication. Optimal management has not been established. The purposes of this study were to analyze clinical findings and to retrospectively evaluate the graft-retaining treatment regimen.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2021, a total of 1561 primary PCL reconstructions were performed at our institution. Seven patients with septic arthritis were identified and retrospectively analyzed with regard to incidence, clinical manifestations, treatment, postoperative clinical course and follow-up results.

RESULTS

The mean interval from PCL reconstruction to the onset of symptoms was 11.0 ± 4.0 days. Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly found pathogen. Eradication was achieved in all patients after a mean of 1.1 ± 0.4 procedures, with graft retention in all patients. The mean duration of antibiotic treatment was 5.7 ± 1.5 weeks. At the last follow-up, there was no recurrence, graft insufficiency or osteoarthritis.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic graft-retaining treatment combined with individual antibiotic therapy, eradication and good to excellent functional results can be achieved, which might encourage surgeons to try to retain the graft as much as possible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Analysis of bone union after medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy using a new radiographic scoring system

INTRODUCTION

To compare bone union after medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCWDFO) with that after lateral closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LCWDFO) using a novel scoring system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of 30 patients who received biplanar MCWDFO for valgus knees (MCWDFO group) were retrospectively examined and compared to that of 22 patients (25 knees) who underwent biplanar LCWDFO via a double-level osteotomy (DLO) for varus knees (LCWDFO group). The progression of bone union of the transverse osteotomy plane in the femur was assessed using a newly developed scoring system using radiographs taken immediately after surgery and 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The scoring system is based on a scale of zero to six points with higher scores indicating better bone union. The incidence of hinge fractures was assessed using CT images, and the rates of reoperation were evaluated using medical record data.

RESULTS

The mean bone union score was significantly lower in the MCWDFO group than in the LCWDFO group 3 months (2.1 ± 1.9 vs. 3.7 ± 1.7, P < 0.01) and 6 months (3.8 ± 2.1 vs 4.9 ± 1.5, P < 0.05) postoperatively. The incidence ratio of hinge fractures was significantly higher in the MCWDFO group than in the LCWDFO group (70.0% vs. 32.0%, P < 0.01). Two patients in the MCWDFO group underwent reoperation for delayed bone union or non-union.

CONCLUSION

Bone union progression was slower and hinge fractures were more frequently observed after MCWDFO than after LCWDFO via DLO. MCWDFO is technically challenging, and patients must be monitored closely during and after surgery.