A safe transition to a more personalized alignment in total knee arthroplasty: the importance of a "safe zone" concept

Change of CPAK class does not affect functional outcomes in robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty performed with functional alignment

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of post-operative coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) class change on functional outcomes and determine the rate and type of CPAK class change after image-based robotic arm-assisted (RA)-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed with functional alignment (FA) at two different centres.

METHODS

The present retrospective, observational, multicentre study included 201 patients treated with RA-TKA between October 2020 and April 2022 at two different centres. The radiographic CPAK classification was adapted using CT images to achieve pre- and post-operative knee categorization into CPAK classes. At a minimum of 1 year post-operatively, patients were administered the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) and surveyed about their post-operative satisfaction level using a 5-level Likert scale (5-LLS).

RESULTS

The most common preoperative overall CPAK classes were: Types II, I, III, IV and V. Implant positioning after RA-TKA with FA within the alignment boundaries, determined distribution in the CPAK classification, predominantly maintaining classes I, II, IV, and V. No statistically significant FJS-12 differences were detected between subjects who maintained and changed their preoperative CPAK class. The mean 5-LLS for satisfaction in patients where the preoperative CPAK class was maintained intraoperatively was 4.4 ± 1.1 (range = 1-5), while subjects having the CPAK class changed had a mean 5-LLS of 4.4 ± SD 1.0 (range 1-5).

CONCLUSION

In the setting of image-based RA-TKA with FA, CPAK can be changed within a 'functional safe-zone', without compromising functional outcomes. Good functional outcomes are the result of a stable and balanced knee with soft-tissue preservation, regardless of the maintenance of the preoperative CPAK class.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Patient-reported outcome measures following individualised TKA are not affected by the degree of preoperative coronal varus or valgus laxity

PURPOSE

To determine whether there is a correlation between preoperative coronal varus or valgus laxity and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) 2 years after individualised total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Records of 150 consecutive patients who received individualised TKA were retrospectively analysed, and 126 with complete pre- and postoperative data were included. Preoperative coronal varus and valgus stress radiographs (15 N load) were taken using a telos stress device with the knee in 5°-10° of flexion. Varus stress angles were positive if the joint opened on the lateral side, and valgus stress angles were positive if the joint opened on the medial side. The sum of varus and valgus stress angles indicated total joint laxity. During surgery, cases that required tibial recuts to balance the joint were recorded. Patients completed three PROMs and rated their satisfaction. Correlations between laxity and PROMs were evaluated using Pearson's correlation.

RESULTS

Stress radiographs revealed varus stress angles of 6.3° ± 3.5° (range, -4.5° to 14.1°), valgus stress angles of 0.1° ± 3.7° (range, -8.0° to 10.9°), and the sum of the varus and valgus stress angle of 6.4° ± 3.3° (range, 0.1° to 17.1°). There were no correlations between laxity and PROMs: r < 0.160 for varus stress angle, r < 0.180 for valgus stress angle and r < 0.160 for the sum of stress angles. There were no statistically significant or clinically relevant differences in PROMs between knees without and those with tibial recuts.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative coronal varus or valgus laxity was not correlated with PROMs following individualised TKA at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Individualised TKA with personalised alignment enables adequate accommodation of a broad spectrum of preoperative coronal varus-valgus laxities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Effect of tibia-first, restricted functional alignment technique on gap width changes, and component positioning in robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

This study aims to quantitatively assess the predictability of post-resection gap dimensions and the attainment of balanced gaps using robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 100 consecutive patients who underwent robotic arm-assisted TKA for knee osteoarthritis using a restricted functional alignment (FA) technique. Tibial cuts were performed based on preoperative tibial anatomy within predefined boundaries, followed by femoral component adjustments according to tensioned soft tissues to optimise gap balance. The primary outcome was the proportion of balanced gaps, defined as differential laxities of ≤2 mm, across extension, flexion, lateral, and medial gap measurements. Ligament balancing in lateral and medial compartments was assessed using a robotic system at 10° and 90° flexion to evaluate if restricted FA facilitated a balanced knee. Secondary outcomes included implant alignment, resection depth, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

RESULTS

Significant increases in both lateral and medial gaps at 10° and 90° flexion were observed following tibial and femoral bone resections (p < 0.001). At extension, average gap changes were 0.9 mm (lateral) and 1.6 mm (medial) after tibial cuts, and 0.5 mm (lateral) and 1.2 mm (medial) after femoral cuts. At 90° flexion, changes were 0.3 mm (lateral) and 1.7 mm (medial) following tibial cuts, and 1.0 mm (lateral) and 1.4 mm (medial) after femoral cuts. Despite these variations, the tibia-first, gap-balancing technique achieved overall balance in 98% of gap measurements. The tibial component was placed at an average of 2.1° varus, while the femoral component was positioned at 0.3° varus and 1.3° external rotation relative to the surgical transepicondylar axis. Significant improvements in PROMs were noted between preoperative and one-year postoperative evaluations (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The tibia-first, restricted FA technique achieved a well-balanced knee in 98% of cases, despite inconsistent gap increments observed between initial assessments and post-resection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV.

Current developments in robotic assistance technology for total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive overview

Knee arthritis is a common degenerative joint disease, usually with joint swelling, chronic pain, and dysfunction as the main clinical manifestations. At present, the conservative treatment for knee arthritis is mostly using anti-inflammatory and analgesic drugs, but the effect is mostly temporary, and can not prevent its progress and surgery is usually the last treatment method. Total knee arthroplasty, also known as TKA, is one of the most effective treatments for osteoarthritis of the knee that has progressed to the end stage. The inevitable human factor in conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) frequently results in poor positioning of the prosthesis during the reconstruction of the lower limb's biomechanical axis. This can lead to severe postoperative pain, accelerated wear of the prosthesis, early loosening, and other problems in the affected knee, which has always been a primary concern for orthopaedic surgeons. Over the course of the past few years, China has gradually begun to develop joint robots. The idea is to plan the surgical plan based on the anatomical structure of the affected limb before the operation, and then to use a mechanical arm and a visual system to assist in the implantation of the prosthesis while the operation is being performed. The treatment costs of robot-assisted technology, on the other hand, vary greatly, and there is still a relatively small amount of high-quality evidence on clinical efficacy. This is because the field of robotic-assisted technology is a relatively new one that has gradually developed over the past few years. In order to provide a fundamental reference for the application value of new treatment methods for advanced knee osteoarthritis, it is necessary to conduct an analysis of the current status of the application of joint robots, as well as the technical advantages and disadvantages that they bring.This narrative study delineates the historical context and current clinical application of robots in knee replacement surgery. An examination of the advantages and disadvantages of RATKA in comparison to TKA offers insights on the prospective application value of the technology.Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Do PROMs or Sensor-Based Monitoring Detect Improvements in Patients' Knee Function After Total-Knee Arthroplasty?-A Study Protocol for a Prospective Controlled Study

Determining whether preoperative performance-based knee function predicts postoperative performance-based knee function and whether patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) completed by participants can detect these changes could significantly enhance the planning of postoperative rehabilitation for patients following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aims to collect data on performance-based knee function using inertial measurement units (IMUs) worn by participants both preoperatively and postoperatively. PROMs will be completed by the patients before and after surgery to assess their ability to detect the same changes in performance-based knee function measured by the sensors. Additionally, the study will investigate the correlation between the degree of knee alignment correction and postoperative performance-based knee function in participants after TKA.

Kinematical alignment better restores native patellar tracking pattern than mechanical alignment

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess whether kinematic alignment (KA) outperforms mechanical alignment (MA) in restoring patellar tracking to native patterns by using a clustering algorithm.

METHODS

Twenty cadavers (40 knees) were evaluated. For each cadaver, one knee was randomly assigned to KA and the other to MA. KA total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures were performed using a caliper-verified technique, while MA TKA procedures utilized a measured resection technique. Subsequently, all specimens were mounted on a customized knee-testing system, and patellar tracking was measured using a motion analysis system. All patellar tracking data were clustered using the density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise algorithm. Differences in patellar tracking patterns and the restoration of native patellar tracking were compared between the two alignment strategies.

RESULTS

Patellar tracking patterns following KA were considerably different from MA. Pre- and post-TKA patellar tracking patterns following MA were grouped into separate clusters, whereas a substantial proportion of patellar tracking patterns following KA were grouped into the pre-TKA dominant cluster. Compared to MA, a greater proportion of patellar tracking patterns following KA showed similar patterns to native knees (p < 0.05) and more patellar tracking patterns following KA paired with preoperative patterns (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

KA restored native patellar tracking patterns more closely compared to MA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Does robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty have a role to play in large deformities?

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for patients with a large preoperative deformity (more than 10° varus or valgus) remains a challenge leading to a high rate of outliers, unsatisfactory functional results, or early prosthetic loosening. Robotic arm-assisted TKA (RATKA) has shown improvements in implant positioning accuracy. This study aimed to assess RATKA implant positioning accuracy and functional results at one year postoperative for patients with a large preoperative deformity.

METHODS

From November 2019 to July 2022, 500 RATKA were performed. About 74 patients with more than 10° of varus or valgus global deformity were included. Each patient received a semi-constrained implant. The difference between the valgus or varus value planned intra-operatively and the varus or valgus measured on one-year postoperative X-rays has been assessed. Functional outcomes (VAS, range of motion, KOOS) have also been evaluated.

RESULTS

For varus, the mean difference was 0.54 ± 1.21°, all patients (100%) had a difference of less than 3° at one-year post-operative. For valgus, the mean difference was 0.63 ± 1.29°, most patients (92%) had a difference of less than 3° at one year postoperative. Overall, 98.6% (n = 73) of cases had a difference of less than 3° at one-year postoperative. The mean VAS was 1.6 ± 1.4 [1;4]. Mean flexion was 132 ± 7.6° [100;145]. A total of 69 patients (93%) had a good or excellent KOOS score (KOOS total > 70) at one year post-operative.

CONCLUSION

For large preoperative deformities, RATKA provides a high degree of accuracy in implant positioning, permitting it to fit the desired alignment without compromising knee stability, and giving the possibility of using semi-constrained implants. At one year postoperative, functional results are encouraging and most patients have recovered an optimal range of motions.

Trochlea morphology demonstrates variability but no gender difference in osteoarthritic patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

In recent years, coronal lower leg alignment has received significant attention. Two classifications recently described the variability in both femoral and tibial morphology, resulting in differing native lower limb alignment. The native trochlea and the variability in morphology has received less attention.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study of 200 patients undergoing robotically assisted TKA. Preoperative transverse CT scans were used to determine the posterior condylar axis (PCA), transepicondylar axis (TEA), lateral trochlear inclination (LTI), the sulcus angle (SA) and the anterior trochlear line (ATL). Outliers were defined as values > 1.5 IQR from median value. Trochlea dysplasia was defined as LTI < 12°. Gender differences were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 99 patients were female (49.4%). SA had a median of 137.0° (IQR 12°), ATL 4° (IQR 4), LTI 18° (IQR 7°). Median TEA-PCA was 5° external (IQR 3°). There were 5.0% outliers in SA, 3.0% of outliers in ATL, 3.5% outliers in LTI and 4.5% outliers in the TEA-PCA. Trochlear dysplasia was present in 11.5% of the measurements. There was no difference in any of the angles between the genders.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates no difference in trochlea morphology between the genders, rather a significant number of overall outliers in trochlear morphology. Larger cohorts but also, more investigations, are needed to better understand the trochlear morphology of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. The personalized alignment strategies and implants need to account for this variability in the population.

The effect of different alignment strategies on trochlear orientation after total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

When planning and delivering total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there are multiple coronal alignment strategies such as functional alignment (FA), kinematic alignment (KA), mechanical and adjusted mechanical alignment (MA, aMA). Recent three-dimensional and robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) studies have demonstrated that KA potentially better restores the trochlear anatomy than MA. The purpose of this study was to compare the restoration of the native trochlear orientation in patients undergoing RAS TKA using four different alignment strategies. It was hypothesised that FA would result in the lowest number of outliers.

METHODS

This is a prospective study of 200 patients undergoing RAS-TKA with a single implant. All patients were analysed for MA and KA prebalancing, and 157 patients received aMA and 43 patients FA with intraoperative balancing. Preoperative transverse computed tomography scans were used to determine the posterior condylar axis (PCA), lateral trochlear inclination (LTI) angle, sulcus angle (SA) and anterior trochlear line (ATL) angle. Implant measurements were obtained using a photographic analysis. Intraoperative software data combined with implant data and preoperative measurements were used to calculate the differences. Outliers were defined as ≥3° of alteration. Trochlea dysplasia was defined as LTI < 12°.

RESULTS

Native transepicondylar PCA had a median of 2°, LTI 18°, SA 137°, ATL 4°. LTI outliers were observed in 47%-60% of cases, with KA < FA < aMA < MA. For ATL, the range of outliers was 40.5%-85%, KA < FA < aMA < MA. SA produced 81% of outliers. Of all median angle values, only LTI when using KA was not significantly altered compared to the native knee.

CONCLUSION

There is a significant alteration of trochlear orientation after TKA, regardless of the alignment strategy used. KA produced the lowest, but a substantial, number of outliers. The uniform design of implants causes the surgeon to compromise on balance in flexion versus trochlear position. The clinical relevance of this compromise requires further clinical investigations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective cohort study.

Limitations of the knee society score in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

The Knee Society Scoring System (KSS) is a frequently used outcome score which quantifies functional patients' outcomes before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Several problems arise when trying to implement KSS for obtaining postoperative outcomes after more personalised aligned TKAs. Scoring for valgus femorotibial angle (FTA) intervals outside moderate ranges is often poorly explained, the specific version of KSS used for outcome collection is frequently unclear and the exact measuring methods are typically not described in the literature. The aims of this systematic review were to investigate the latest user practice, the application of KSS and its limitations after kinematically aligned (KA) TKA.

Methods

A systematic literature search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Medline and Scopus to identify potentially relevant articles for this review, published from the beginning of January 2013 until the end of January 2023. Broad Mesh terms such as 'kinematic alignment', 'total knee arthroplasty' and 'knee society score' were used for building search strategy in each database accordingly. Articles reporting postoperative values of the objective surgeon-assessed KSS after KA TKA or KA and mechanically aligned TKA were included. For assessing included randomised control trials (RCTs), an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's design-specific scale for assessing RCTs was used. The non-RCTs were assessed by using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool. The Ottawa-Newcastle Score system was also used. Studies were additionally evaluated for their radiological methodology by using a five-question checklist (Radiological Assessment Qualit criteria).

Results

The initial search identified 167 studies, of which 129 were considered for screening. Ten studies reporting outcomes after KA TKA did not use the objective surgeon-assessed part of KSS for clinical outcome measurement, and 30 studies reporting outcomes after KA TKA did not use KSS at all for clinical and/or functional outcomes. From the 10 included studies, only six have used the latest KSS score (2011), the rest using its 1989 variant; and out of these six studies, only two presented values of the FTA, which is needed for calculating the KSS's 'alignment' subcomponent, the rest presenting hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) values. Additionally, when converting these HKA values to FTA intervals, the authors of this systematic review found that KA TKA FTA intervals display limits, which tend to be outside the 'well-scored' KSS anatomical alignment interval.

Conclusion

The inconsistent and nonstandardised use of the surgeon-assessed KSS across studies reviewed compromises assessment reliability and patient outcome scores. To enhance precision and comparability, it is crucial to standardise the KSS application, incorporating personalised alignment strategies for more accurate patient evaluations.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is not associated with improved accuracy in implant position and alignment compared to conventional instrumentation in the execution of a preoperative digital plan

Purpose

The primary objective of the present study was to evaluate if robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RO-TKA) results in improved accuracy compared to conventional TKA (CO-TKA) with respect to alignment and component positioning executing a preoperative digital plan. The secondary objective was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between the two groups at 6 months of follow-up (FU).

Methods

Patients who underwent primary TKA using the concept of constitutional alignment were identified from the database. Each patient underwent preoperative digital planning as well as postoperative evaluation of the preoperative plan (alignment and component position) using mediCAD® software (Hectec GmbH). Two groups were formed: (i) The RO-TKA group (n = 30) consisted of patients who underwent TKA with a robotic surgical system (ROSA®, Zimmer Biomet) and (ii) the CO-TKA group (n = 67) consisted of patients who underwent TKA with conventional instrumentation. To assess accuracy, all qualitative variables were analysed using the χ 2 test. Tegner activity scale, Oxford Knee Score and visual analogue scale were assessed preop and at 6-month FU. To assess differences between the two groups, a 2 × 2 repeated measures analysis of variance was performed.

Results

There was no significant (p > 0.05) difference in the accuracy of alignment as well as tibial and femoral component position between the two groups. At the 6-month FU, there was no significant (p > 0.05) difference in PROMs between the two groups.

Conclusion

While robotic TKA may have some potential advantages, no significant difference was found between robotic and conventional TKA with respect to limb alignment, clinical outcomes and component positioning.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

Personalized alignment techniques better restore the native trochlear groove compared to systematic alignment techniques in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The relationship between constitutional coronal alignment and implant positioning on trochlear groove restoration in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is poorly understood. This study aimed to determine whether the choice of alignment philosophy significantly affects the restoration of the trochlea groove.

METHODS

Sixty-one imageless robotic TKAs performed by a single orthopaedic surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. In each case, the entire native trochlea was digitized to generate the native femoral anatomy, and implants were planned according to a functional alignment (FA) technique. Final implant position was recorded using the validated bone resection planes from the navigation system. Simulated femoral component positions were generated according to previously described alignment techniques: mechanical alignment (MA), gap balancing (GB), kinematic alignment (KA), restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) and restricted inverse kinematic alignment (riKA). Trochlear angle (TA), trochlear under/overstuffing and mediolateral sulcus offset were compared between the six simulated alignment techniques, as well as the final implanted technique. Further analyses investigated the effect of preoperative coronal alignment on trochlear position. Comparisons were assessed with an analysis of variance and Welch's t-tests or Wilcoxon's rank-sum tests with Bonferroni corrections.

RESULTS

The implanted and simulated techniques all resulted in greater TA valgus compared to the native groove (p < 0.001). The implanted technique, KA and rKA were closer to the native TA than GB, MA and riKA (p > 0.001). All alignment philosophies understuffed the native trochlea groove. KA and rKA understuffed less than all other techniques (p < 0.001), and GB understuffed more than all other techniques (p < 0.001). In extension, all techniques shifted the trochlear sulcus laterally, while in flexion, they medialized it. These effects were most prominent in GB and MA.

CONCLUSION

Personalized alignment techniques such as KA and rKA, which consider variations in individual anatomy, best restore the native patellar groove compared to systematic alignment techniques when using a standardized femoral component.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective review.

Definition of normal, neutral, deviant and aberrant coronal knee alignment for total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

One of the most pertinent questions in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is: what could be considered normal coronal alignment? This study aims to define normal, neutral, deviant and aberrant coronal alignment using large data from a computed tomography (CT)-scan database and previously published phenotypes.

METHODS

Coronal alignment parameters from 11,191 knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients were measured based on three dimensional reconstructed CT data using a validated planning software. Based on these measurements, patients' coronal alignment was phenotyped according to the functional knee phenotype concept. These phenotypes represent an alignment variation of the overall hip knee ankle angle (HKA), femoral mechanical angle (FMA) and tibial mechanical angle (TMA). Each phenotype is defined by a specific mean and covers a range of ±1.5° from this mean. Coronal alignment is classified as normal, neutral, deviant and aberrant based on distribution frequency. Mean values and distribution among the phenotypes are presented and compared between two populations (OA patients in this study and non-OA patients from a previously published study).

RESULTS

The arithmetic HKA (aHKA), combined normalised data of FMA and TMA, showed that 36.0% of knees were neutral within ±1 SD from the mean in both angles, 44.3% had either a TMA or a FMA within ±1-2 SD (normally aligned), 15.3% of the patients were deviant within ±2-3 SD and only 4.4% of them had an aberrant alignment (±3-4 SD in 3.4% and >4 SD in 1.0% of the patients respectively). However, combining the normalised data of HKA, FMA and TMA, 15.4% of patients were neutral in all three angles, 39.7% were at least normal, 27.7% had at least one deviant angle and 17.2% had at least one aberrant angle. For HKA, the males exhibited 1° varus and females were neutral. For FMA, the females exhibited 0.7° more valgus in mean than males and grew 1.8° per category (males grew 2.1° per category). For TMA, the males exhibited 1.3° more varus than females and both grew 2.3° and 2.4° (females) per category. Normal coronal alignment was 179.2° ± 2.8-5.6° (males) and 180.5 > ± 2.8-5.6° (females) for HKA, 93.1 > ± 2.1-4.2° (males) and 93.8 > ± 1.8-3.6° (females) for FMA and 86.7 > ± 2.3-4.6° (males) and 88 > ± 2.4-4.8° (females) for TMA. This means HKA 6.4 varus or 4.8° valgus (males) or 5.1° varus to 6.1° valgus was considered normal. For FMA HKA 1.1 varus or 7.3° valgus (males) or 0.2° valgus to 7.4° valgus was considered normal. For TMA HKA 7.9 varus or 1.3° valgus (males) or 6.8° varus to 2.8° valgus was considered normal. Aberrant coronal alignment started from 179.2° ± 8.4° (males) and 180.5 > ± 8.4° (females) for HKA, 93.1 > ± 6.3° (males) 93.8 > ± 5.4° (females) for FMA and 86.7 > ± 6.9° (males) and 88 > ± 7.2° (females) for TMA. This means HKA > 9.2° varus or 7.6° valgus (males) or 7.9° varus to 8.9° valgus was considered aberrant.

CONCLUSION

Definitions of neutrality, normality, deviance as well as aberrance for coronal alignment in TKA were proposed in this study according to their distribution frequencies. This can be seen as an important first step towards a safe transition from the conventional one-size-fits-all to a more personalised coronal alignment target. There should be further definitions combining bony alignment, joint surfaces' morphology, soft tissue laxities and joint kinematics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

No Benefit of Robotic-Assisted over Computer-Assisted Surgery for Achieving Neutral Coronal Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty

The use of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is becoming increasingly popular due to better precision, potentially superior outcomes and the ability to achieve alternative alignment strategies. The most commonly used alignment strategy with RAS is a modification of mechanical alignment (MA), labeled adjusted MA (aMA). This strategy allows slight joint line obliquity of the tibial component to achieve superior balancing. In the present study, we compared coronal alignment after TKA using RAS with aMA and computer-assisted surgery (CAS) with MA that has been the standard in the center for more than 10 years. We analyzed a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing TKA in a single center. Lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were compared for both techniques. In 140 patients, 68 CASs and 72 RASs, we observed no difference in postoperative measurements (median 90 degrees for all, LDFA p = 0.676, MPTA p = 0.947) and no difference in outliers <2 degrees (LDFA p = 0.540, MPTA p = 0.250). The present study demonstrates no benefit in eliminating outliers or achieving neutral alignment of both the femoral and the tibial components in robotic-assisted versus computer-assisted TKA if MA is the target. To utilize the precision of RAS, it is recommended to aim for more personalized alignment strategies. The level of evidence is level III retrospective study.

Increased Femoral Component Flexion and No Difference in Slope in Robotic- versus Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty When Targeting Mechanical Alignment

Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is becoming popular due to better precision, when compared with other instrumentation. Although RAS has been validated in comparison with computer-assisted surgery (CAS), data from clinical settings comparing these two techniques are lacking. This is especially the case for sagittal alignment. Whereas pure mechanical alignment (MA) aims for 0 to 3 degrees of flexion of the femoral component and 3° of posterior slope for the tibial component, adjusted MA (aMA) mostly used with RAS allows for flexing of the femoral component for downsizing and increase of slope for an increase of the flexion gap. In the present study, we compared sagittal alignment after TKA using RAS with aMA and CAS targeting MA, which has been the standard in the center for more than 10 years. We analyzed a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing TKA in a single center. Femoral component flexion and tibial slope were compared for both techniques. In 140 patients, 68 CAS and 72 RAS, we found no difference in tibial slope (p = 0.661), 1° median femoral component flexion (p = 0.023), and no difference in outliers (femur, p = 0.276, tibia, p = 0.289). RAS slightly increases femoral component flexion, but has no influence on tibial slope, when compared with CAS in TKA. If MA is the target, RAS provides no benefit over CAS for achieving the targeted sagittal alignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:  Level III retrospective study.

Restricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty with an anatomically designed implant can restore constitutional coronal lower limb alignment

PURPOSE

Restricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (rKA-TKA) may not restore the constitutional varus alignment in most patients with knee osteoarthritis. This study aimed to investigate (1) the extent to which constitutional lower limb alignment can be restored by rKA-TKA using an anatomically designed implant and (2) which lower limb alignment parameters are associated with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

This study included 60 patients who underwent rKA-TKA using an anatomically designed implant. Radiographic alignment parameters, including mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), coronal hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), coronal joint line obliquity (JLO), posterior tibial slope (PTS), single-leg standing knee flexion angle (KFA), sagittal JLO, and arithmetic HKA (aHKA), were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) was used for clinical evaluation.

RESULTS

The mLDFA, MPTA, and aHKA showed no significant differences before and after surgery. Coronal HKA and PTS have significantly changed from 8.1 ± 8.7° and 9.9 ± 8.6° preoperatively to 3.5 ± 3.1° and 2.5 ± 2.0° postoperatively, respectively (p < 0.001 for each comparison). The postoperative WOMAC total score was significantly correlated with the KFA (r = 0.4063, p = 0.0034) and sagittal JLO (r = -0.3435, p = 0.0157). Postoperative KFA is a causal factor for the increased postoperative WOMAC total score (r = 1.416, 95% confidence interval: 0.491-2.342, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

rKA-TKA using an anatomically designed implant can restore constitutional coronal lower limb alignment, while postoperative KFA and sagittal JLO were associated with poor PROMs. Care should be taken for the postoperative KFA because it is a risk factor for poor PROMs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case-control study.

Definitions and consequences of current alignment techniques and phenotypes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) - there is no winner yet

Dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been extensively documented and it was attributed to numerous factors. In recent years, significant focus has been directed towards implant alignment and stability as potential causes and solutions to this issue. Surgeons are now exploring a more personalized approach to TKA, recognizing the importance of thoroughly understanding each individual patient's anatomy and functional morphology. A more comprehensive preoperative analysis of alignment and knee morphology is essential to address the unresolved questions in knee arthroplasty effectively. The crucial task of determining the most appropriate alignment strategy for each patient arises, given the substantial variability in bone resection resulting from the interplay of phenotype and the alignment strategy chosen. This review aims to comprehensively present the definitions of different alignment techniques in all planes and discuss the consequences dependent on knee phenotypes.Level of evidence V.

Navigated, gap-balanced, adjusted mechanical alignment achieves alignment and balancing goals in a very high percentage but with partially non-anatomical resections

PURPOSE

Navigated, gap-balanced adjusted mechanical alignment (AMA) including a 0° varus tibial cut and modification of angles and resections of the femoral cuts to obtain optimal balance accepting minor axis deviations. Objectives of this study were (1) to analyse to what extent AMA achieves the goals for leg alignment and gap balance, and (2) in what percentage non-anatomical cuts are needed to achieve these goals.

METHODS

Out of 1000 total knee arthroplasties (TKA) all varus knees (hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle < 178°; n = 680) were included. All surgeries were performed as computer assisted surgery (CAS) in AMA technique. CAS data at the end of surgery were analysed with respect to HKA and gap-sizes. All bone cuts were quantified. Depending on the amount of deformity, a subgroup analysis was performed. It was analysed whether the amount of deformity influences the non-anatomical cuts by correlation analysis.

RESULTS

AMA reached the goals for postoperative HKA (3° corridor) in 636 cases (93.5%). While extension and flexion gap balance were achieved in more than 653 cases (96%), flexion and extension gap size were equalled in 615 knees (90.4%). The resections of the lateral tibia plateau and distal and posterior medial femoral condyle were anatomical (Tibia: 7.0 ± 1.7 mm; medial condyle distal: 7.8 ± 1.4 mm; medial posterior: 8.2 ± 1.8 mm). The number of non-anatomical resections for those cuts were low; 67 (9.9%); 24 (3.5%); 32 (4.7%). For the medial tibia plateau and the lateral posterior condyle, the cuts were non-anatomical in a high percentage of cases; Tibia: 606 (89.1%), lateral posterior condyle: 398 (58.5%). Moderate but significant correlations were found between resection differences and amount of deformity (medio-lateral: tibia: 0.399; distal femur: 0.310; posterior femur: 0.167). No correlations were found between resection differences and gap values.

CONCLUSION

AMA reaches the intended target for HKA and gap balance in over 612 (90%) of cases and maintains the medial femoral condyle anatomically. Non-anatomical tibial resection causes increased external rotation of the femoral component and by that non-anatomical cut of the posterior lateral condyle. Nonanatomical resections of AMA might be one reason for the persisting high rate of unsatisfied patients after TKA. Anatomical and individual alignment philosophies might help to reduce this rate of dissatisfaction.

Verasense sensor-assisted total knee arthroplasty showed no difference in range of motion, reoperation rate or functional outcomes when compared to manually balanced total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the clinical and functional knee outcomes after Verasense sensor-assisted total knee arthroplasty (VA TKA), and to compare these outcomes, where possible, with those from manually balanced total knee arthroplasty (MB TKA).

METHODS

A systematic literature search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Medline and Scopus from the beginning of January 2012 until the end of June 2022, to identify potentially relevant articles for this review. Selection was based on the following inclusion criteria: full text English- or German-language clinical studies, published in peer-reviewed journals, which assessed clinical and functional outcomes following VA TKA. Not original research, preprints, abstract-only papers, protocols, reviews, expert opinion papers, book chapters, surgical technique papers, and studies pertaining only to unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) or patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) were excluded. Several scores (Knee Society Score [KSS], Oxford Knee Score [OKS], Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC], Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-4 subscales [KOOS4] and Physical Function-Computerised Adaptive Testing [PF-CAT]), alongside postoperative measurements of range of motion [ROM], reoperation rates and the rate of manipulation under anaesthesia [MUA]) were used to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes. The quality of included papers, except randomised control trials (RCTs), was evaluated using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS). For the assessment of included RCTs, the Jadad Scale was used.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 243 articles. After removing duplicates, 184 papers were included in the initial screening process. Fourteen of them met all the inclusion criteria following the selection process. Mean MINORS for non-comparative studies value was 11.5 (11-12), and for comparative studies 18.2 (13-21). Mean Jadad Scale score was 3.6 (2-5). Outcomes from a total number of 3633 patients were evaluated (mean age at surgery 68.5 years [32-88 years]). In terms of clinical outcomes, the overwhelming majority of studies observed an improvement after VA TKA, but no statistically significant difference in ROM and reoperation rate when compared to MB TKA. On the other hand, lower rates of MUA have been described in the VA TKA group. An increase in postoperative clinical and functional scores values, when compared to the preoperative ones, has been reported in both groups, although no statistically significant difference between them has been observed.

CONCLUSION

The use of Verasense pressure sensors in TKA leads to no significant improvement in ROM, reoperation rate or functional outcomes, when compared to the standard manually balancing technique. However, lower rates of MUA have been described in the VA TKA group. These findings highlight the importance of tools being able to measure ligament stresses or joint pressure for achieving an optimally balanced knee.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The impact of different alignment strategies on bone cuts in total knee arthroplasty for varus knee phenotypes

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to visualise the influence of alignment strategy on bone resection in varus knee phenotypes. The hypothesis was that different amounts of bone resection would be required depending on the alignment strategy chosen. Through visualisation of the corresponding bone sections, it was hypothesised, it would be possible to assess which of the different alignment strategies would require the least amount of change to the soft tissues for the chosen phenotype, whilst still ensuring acceptable alignment of the components, and thus could be considered the most ideal alignment strategy.

METHODS

Simulations of the different alignment strategies (mechanical, anatomical, constrained kinematic and unconstrained kinematic) in relation to their bone resections were performed on five common exemplary varus knee phenotypes. VAR_HKA174° VAR_FMA87° VAR_TMA84°, VAR_HKA174° VAR_FMA90° NEU_TMA87°, VAR_HKA174° NEU_FMA93° VAR_TMA84°, VAR_HKA177° NEU_FMA93° NEU_TMA87° and VAR_HKA177° VAL_FMA96° VAR_TMA81°. The phenotype system used categorises knees based on overall limb alignment (i.e. hip knee angle) but also takes into account joint line obliquity (i.e. TKA and FMA) and has been applied in the global orthopaedic community since its introduction in 2019. The simulations are based on long-leg radiographs under load. It is assumed that a change of 1° in the alignment of the joint line corresponds to a displacement of the distal condyle by 1 mm.

RESULTS

In the most common phenotype VAR_HKA174° NEU_FMA93° VAR_TMA84°, a mechanical alignment would result in an asymmetric elevation of the tibial medial joint line by 6 mm and a lateral distalisation of the femoral condyle by 3 mm, an anatomical alignment only by 0 and 3 mm, a restricted by 3 and 3 mm, respectively, whilst a kinematic alignment would result in no change in joint line obliquity. In the similarly common phenotype 2 VAR_HKA174° VAR_FMA90° NEU_TMA87° with the same HKA, the changes are considerably less with only 3 mm asymmetric height change on one joint side, respectively, and no change in restricted or kinematic alignment.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that significantly different amounts of bone resection are required depending on the varus phenotype and the alignment strategy chosen. Based on the simulations performed, it can, therefore, be assumed that an individual decision for the respective phenotype is more important than the dogmatically correct alignment strategy. By including such simulations, the modern orthopaedic surgeon can now avoid biomechanically inferior alignments and still obtain the most natural possible knee alignment for the patient.

How does the use of quantified gap-balancing affect component positioning and limb alignment in robotic total knee arthroplasty using functional alignment philosophy? A comparison of two robotic platforms

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the effect of an image-based (MAKO) system using a gap-balancing technique with an imageless (OMNIbot) robotic tool utilising a femur-first measured resection technique.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients undergoing primary TKA with a functional alignment philosophy performed by a single surgeon using either the MAKO or OMNIbot robotic systems. In all cases, the surgeon's goal was to create a balanced knee and correct sagittal deformity (eliminate any fixed flexion deformity). Intra-operative data and patient-reported outcomes (PROMS) were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 207 MAKO TKA and 298 OMNIbot TKAs were analysed. MAKO TKA patients were younger (67 vs 69, p=0.002) than OMNIbot patients. There were no other demographic or pre-operative alignment differences. Regarding implant positioning, in MAKO TKAs the femoral component was more externally rotated in relation to the posterior condylar axis (2.3° vs 0.1°, p<0.001), had less valgus femoral cuts (1.6° vs 2.7° valgus, p<0.001) and more varus tibial cuts (2.4° vs 1.9° varus, p<0.001), and had more bone resected compared to OMNIbot TKAs. OMNIbot cases were more likely to require tibial re-cuts than MAKO (15% vs 2%, p<0.001). There were no differences in femur recut rates, soft tissue releases, or rate of achieving target coronal and sagittal leg alignment between robotic systems. A subgroup analysis of 100 MAKO and 100 OMNIbot propensity-matched TKAs with 12-month follow-up showed no significant difference in OKS (42 vs 43, p=0.7) or OKS PASS scores (83% vs 91%, p=0.1). MAKO TKAs reported significantly better symptoms according to their KOOS symptoms score than patients that had OMNIbot TKAs (87 vs 82, p=0.02) with a higher proportion of KOOS PASS rates, at a slightly longer follow-up time (20 months vs 14 months, p<0.001). There were no other differences in PROMS.

CONCLUSION

A gap-balanced technique with an image-based robotic system (MAKO) results in different implant positioning and bone resection and reduces tibial recuts compared to a femur-first measured resection technique with an imageless robotic system (OMNIbot). Both systems achieve equal coronal and sagittal deformity correction and good patient outcomes at short-term follow-ups irrespective of these differences.

Alignment philosophy influences trochlea recreation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study using image-based robotic technology

PURPOSE

The ability of kinematic alignment (KA) to consistently restore trochlea anatomy in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is unknown despite recreation of constitutional anatomy being its rationale for use. The purpose of this study was to assess if alignment choice in TKA effects the ability to restore the native trochlea groove.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-two consecutive patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA using the MAKO image-based robotic platform had simulated femoral components placed according to kinematic, mechanical and functional alignment principals. Implant position and trochlea restoration between groups were compared. Restoration was assessed by shift (medial-lateral) and depth relative to the native groove from three consistent points; full extension (0°), mid-flexion (30°-40°) and deep flexion (70°-80°).

RESULTS

Three hundred and sixty-six alignment options were analysed. Femoral alignment was significantly different between groups. Of KA, 13.1% compared to 3.3% of FA plans were outside safe coronal boundaries. The trochlear groove was translated the most by MA compared to KA and FA (full extension, MA 7.84 ± 1.99 mm lateral to the native groove, KA 6.40 ± 2.43 mm and FA 6.88 ± 1.74 mm, p ≤ 0.001). In full extension, FA most closely restored the trochlear groove depth in all three positions of flexion.

CONCLUSION

Alignment philosophy led to significant differences in trochlea groove recreation. A kinematically placed femoral component led to positioning considered unsafe in over 13% of cases. A functionally placed femoral component most closely restored trochlea depth in all three positions of flexion.