The risk of anal incontinence in obese women

Fecal incontinence in nonpregnant nulliparous women aged 25 to 64 years-a randomly selected national cohort prevalence study

BACKGROUND

The extent to which fecal incontinence is associated with obstetrical history or pelvic floor injuries is still a controversial and unresolved issue. One crucial first step toward answering this question is the need to study fecal incontinence in nonpregnant, nulliparous women.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to present detailed, descriptive measures of the accidental leakage of liquid or solid stool and gas in a randomly selected, large national cohort of nonpregnant, nulliparous women aged 25 to 64 years.

STUDY DESIGN

The Swedish Total Population Register identified the source population. Four independent, age-stratified, simple random samples in a total of 20,000 nulliparous women aged 25 to 64 years were drawn from 625,810 eligible women. Information was collected in 2014 using postal and web-based questionnaires. The 40-item questionnaire included questions about the presence and frequency of the leakage of solid and liquid stool and gas, which provided the basis for the generic terms fecal and anal incontinence. Statistical analyses of the differences between the groups were performed using the Fisher's exact test for dichotomous variables and the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables. The trend between >2 ordered categories of dichotomous variables was analyzed with Mantel-Haenszel statistics. When analyzing the trend between multiple ordered vs nonordered categorical variables, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. The age-related probability and risk increase per 10 years for incontinence parameters was calculated from logistic regression models adjusted for body mass index.

RESULTS

The study population was 9197 women, and the response rate was 52.2%, ranging from 44.7% in women aged 25 to 34 years to 62.4% among those from 55 to 64 years. All the types of incontinence, except severe isolated gas incontinence, increased with age up to 64 years. The estimated probability of fecal incontinence was 8.8% at age 25 years and 17.6% at age 64. The leakage of liquid stool was dominant, occurring in 93.1% (95% confidence interval, 91.4-94.5) of the women with fecal incontinence, whereas leakage of solid stool occurred in 33.9% (95% confidence interval, 31.1-36.7), of which approximately 80% also had concomitant leakage of liquid stool. The leakage of liquid stool increased markedly up to age 65, whereas the increase in the isolated leakage of solid stool was negligible across all ages (overall <0.4%). Liquid and solid stool, separate or in combination, co-occurred with gas in approximately 80%. The distribution pattern of the different types of leakage, single or combined, was similar in all the age groups. Both age and body mass index (kg/m2) were risk factors for fecal incontinence (P<.0001), with an interaction effect of P=.16.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal stool consistency has been identified as the strongest risk factor for accidental bowel leakage. The same pattern characterized by a dominance of liquid stool and gas leakage, prevalent concomitant leakage of solid and liquid stool, and a negligible rate of isolated leakage of solid feces was observed across all ages. The low rates of isolated leakage of solid stool support the impression that dysfunction of the continence mechanism of the pelvic floor had a negligible role for bowel incontinence, which is essential information for comparison with women with birth-related injuries.

The impact of maternal body mass index on the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injury in nulliparous women: A Victorian retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Maternal obesity is an important comorbidity in contemporary obstetrics practice and is associated with significantly increased perinatal complications. Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) sustained during labour can lead to faecal incontinence, chronic pain and effects on quality of life. Currently, it is unclear if maternal body mass index (BMI) influences the risk of sustaining OASIS.

AIM

To investigate the impact of increased BMI on the rate of OASIS among nulliparous women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, which included nulliparous women with singleton, vaginal deliveries ≥37 weeks gestation at a Victorian regional centre between 2007 and 2017 (n = 3335). Logistic regression was performed to calculate unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (aOR). Women were grouped by World Health Organization BMI categories, and the rates of OASIS were evaluated.

RESULTS

Women with a BMI ≥ 25 were significantly less likely to develop OASIS compared to women with a BMI < 25 (aOR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41-0.89). Women with a BMI ≥ 35 had significantly decreased odds of OASIS compared to normal weight women (aOR 0.27, 0.10-0.78). While not statistically significant, the odds of OASIS decreased with each increase in BMI class. Other statistically significant risk factors were maternal age, birth weight, forceps delivery, non-smokers (aOR 4.03, 1.46-11.1) and diabetes mellitus (aOR 9.48, 2.1-41.4).

CONCLUSION

Women with a BMI ≥ 25 were less likely to sustain OASIS compared to women with a BMI < 25. Furthermore, the odds of OASIS decreased for each increase in BMI category. These findings warrant further investigation into the mechanism of this protective effect.

Perineal massage and training reduce perineal trauma in pregnant women older than 35 years: a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of perineal massage, pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and a pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) prevention educational program in pregnant women above the age of 35 years to prevent perineal tear and episiotomy.

METHODS

A randomized parallel assignment study involved two groups of pregnant women at the obstetrics outpatient clinic 4 weeks prior to their due date. The first group (n = 200) was educated to do digital perineal massage and pelvic floor muscle training and received an educational PFD prevention program. The second group (n = 200) received only the prevention education program. Occurrence of perineal laceration was reported at time of delivery as a primary outcome. Statistical analysis was done using the IBM SPSS computer program (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA), release 22 for Microsoft Windows.

RESULTS

Delivery was significantly less complicated by perineal tear, episiotomy and postnatal pain in the first than in the second group (p < 0.05). Grades of perineal tear were mostly of first and second degree in the first group compared with the second group. We found a significantly lower need for analgesia and fewer ampoules required during the hospital stay in the first group (p < 0.001, 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Performing antenatal digital perineal massage and PFMT in addition to health education is recommended to reduce perineal complications.

Are Obese Patients at an Increased Risk of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Compared to Non-obese Patients?

PURPOSE

Factors associated with increased intra-abdominal pressure such as chronic cough, morbid obesity, and constipation may be related to pelvic floor dysfunction. In this study, we compared anorectal manometry values and clinical data of class II and III morbidly obese patients referred to bariatric surgery with that of non-obese patients.

METHODS

We performed a case-matched study between obese patients referred to bariatric surgery and non-obese patients without anorectal complaints. The groups were matched by age and gender. Men and nulliparous women with no history of abdominal or anorectal surgery were included in the study. Anorectal manometry was performed by the stationary technique, and clinical evaluation was based on validated questionnaires.

RESULTS

Mean age was 44.8 ± 12.5 years (mean ± SD) in the obese group and 44.1 ± 11.8 years in the non-obese group (p = 0.829). In the obese group, 65.4% of patients had some degree of fecal incontinence. Mean squeeze pressure was significantly lower in obese than in non-obese patients (155.6 ± 64.1 vs. 210.1 ± 75.9 mmHg, p = 0.004), and there was no significant difference regarding mean rest pressure in obese patients compared to non-obese ones (63.7 ± 23.1 vs. 74.1 ± 21.8 mmHg, p = 0.051). There were no significant differences in anorectal manometry values between continent and incontinent obese patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of fecal incontinence among obese patients was high regardless of age, gender, and body mass index. Anal squeeze pressure was significantly lower in obese patients compared to non-obese controls.

Incidence and risk factors of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears in a single Italian scenario

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate III and IV degree tears rates and related risk factors in a single Italian centre. The secondary goal was to build a predictive model based on identified risk factors.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study. All vaginal deliveries from 2011 to 2015 in a single Italian University Hospital were analysed. Univariate analysis was applied to evaluate the overall association between each factor and severe tear. Multivariate logistic regression was used to build a predictive model for the absolute risk of severe tear. We computed a resampling validated measure (AUC) of the predictive accuracy of the model and we provided a nomogram for the risk calculation in clinical practice.

RESULTS

62 out of 10133 patients (0.61%) had a severe perineal tear. Univariate analysis identified gestational age >40 weeks, nulliparity, moderate/severe obesity, oxytocin use in pushing stage, sinciput presentation, instrumental delivery, shoulder dystocia, pushing stage ≥90 min, lithotomy position, birth weight >4 kg, head circumference at birth >34 cm and length at birth >50 cm as risk factors. Multivariate analysis identify moderate/severe obesity (OR = 2.8), instrumental delivery (OR = 2.6) and birth weight (OR = 1.1/hg) as independent risk factors. Using the predicted risk score from the final model (bootstrap-validated AUC 70%), we designed a nomogram for severe perineal tears absolute risk calculation.

CONCLUSION

Moderate/severe obesity, instrumental delivery and foetal weight resulted as independent risk factors for severe obstetrical tears.

Changes in bowel habits and patient-scored symptoms after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch

BACKGROUND

Bariatric procedures are increasingly being used, but data on bowel habits are scarce.

OBJECTIVES

To assess changes in gastrointestinal function and patient-scored symptoms after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS).

SETTING

University hospital in Sweden.

METHODS

We recruited 268 adult patients (mean age of 42.5 yr, body mass index 44.8, 67.9% female) listed for RYGB and BPD/DS. Patients answered validated questionnaires prospectively concerning bowel function, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey before and after their operation.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, 208 patients (78.2% of 266 eligible patients) answered the questionnaires. RYGB patients had fewer bowel motions per week (8 versus 10) and more abdominal pain postoperatively (P<.001). Postoperatively, the 35 BPD/DS patients (69% versus 23%) needed to empty their bowel twice or more than twice daily, reported more flatus and urgency, and increased need for keeping a diet (P<.001). Concerning Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, coping and behavior was slightly reduced while depression and self-perception scores were improved after RYGB. Lifestyle, coping and behavior, and embarrassment were reduced after BPD/DS (P<.05). In the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, physical scores were markedly improved, while mental scores were largely unaffected.

CONCLUSION

RYGB resulted in a reduced number of bowel movements but increased problems with abdominal pain. In contrast, BPD/DS-patients reported higher frequency of bowel movements, more troubles with flatus and urgency, and increased need for keeping a diet. These symptoms affected quality of life negatively, however, general quality of life was markedly improved after both procedures. These results will be of great value for preoperative counseling.

Conservative treatment for anal incontinence

Anal incontinence (AI) in adults is a troublesome condition that negatively impacts upon quality of life and results in significant embarrassment and social isolation. The conservative management of AI is the first step and targets symptomatic relief. The reported significant improvement with conservative treatments for AI is close to 25% and involves prescribed changes in lifestyle habits, a reduced intake of foods that may cause or aggravate diarrhea or rectal urgency, and the use of specific anti-diarrheal agents. The use of a mechanical barrier in the form of an anal plug and the outcomes and principles of pelvic kinesitherapies and biofeedback options are outlined. This review discusses a gastroenterologist's approach towards conservative therapy in patients referred with anal incontinence.

Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry/topography in a healthy Korean population and the effects of gender and body mass index

BACKGROUND

High-resolution manometry (HRM) based on spatiotemporal plots is increasingly being used. The aim this study was to evaluate, for the first time, the influence of gender, with adjustment for age, body mass index (BMI), and vaginal delivery, on anorectal functions in asymptomatic adults.

METHODS

Fifty-four asymptomatic healthy subjects (M : F = 27 : 27; age = 20-67 years) who were matched by age and gender were enrolled prospectively. We evaluated anorectal pressures, rectal sensation using a HRM probe, and balloon expulsion time. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to identify the independent effects of each factor.

KEY RESULTS

Anal resting pressure (median [IQR]; 32 [18] vs 46 [17] mmHg, p < 0.001), anal squeeze pressure (75 [28] vs 178 [72] mmHg, p < 0.001), rectal pressure (33 [16] vs 53 [46] mmHg, p = 0.009) and anal pressure (16 [17] vs 30 [36] mmHg, p = 0.019) during simulated evacuation with rectal distention, and the threshold for the desire to defecate (60 [20] vs 80 [60] mL, p = 0.020) were significantly lower in women than in men. BMI was positively correlated with anal resting pressure (95% CI: 0.598-2.947) and negatively correlated with the threshold for first sensation (95% CI: -0.099 to -0.015). Vaginal delivery did not affect any of the anorectal HRM parameters.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

HRM parameters may be associated with gender and BMI. Therefore, gender and BMI should be taken into consideration when interpreting HRM results.

Bariatric surgery improves urinary incontinence but not anorectal function in obese women

BACKGROUND

While the association between obesity and urinary incontinence (UI) in women has been clearly documented, the relationship with anal incontinence (AI) is less well defined; moreover, while bariatric surgery has been shown to improve UI, its effect on AI is still unclear.

METHODS

A total of 32 obese women were studied by means of PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 questionnaires and anorectal manometry before and after bariatric surgery and compared with 71 non-obese women.

RESULTS

Obese women showed worse overall questionnaire results (OR 5.18 for PFDI-20 and 2.66 for PFIQ-7). Whereas obese women showed worse results for urinary sub-items and a higher urge UI incidence (43.8 vs 18.3 %, p = 0.013), they did not show worsening in colorecto-anal symptoms. Post-operatively, median PFDI-20 total score did not change (24.2 vs 26.6, p = ns), while there was an improvement in urinary score (14.6 vs 8.3, p < 0.001); median PFIQ-7 improved (4.8 vs 0.0, p = 0.044), but while the urinary score improved (2.4 vs 0.0, p = 0.033), the colorecto-anal score did not change significantly. Although after surgery urge UI decreased from 43.8 to 15.6 % (p = 0.029), the incidence of any AI increased from 28.1 to 40.6 % (p = ns) and flatus incontinence increased from 18.8 to 37.5 % (p = ns). Anorectal manometry did not show significant changes after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Obese women had worse questionnaire results, but while showing a higher incidence of UI, they did not experience anorectal function worsening. After bariatric surgery, there was a slight improvement in PFD symptoms related to UI, but anorectal function did not change significantly and flatus incontinence increased.

The effect of obesity on fecal incontinence symptom distress, quality of life, and diagnostic testing measures in women

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Weight-loss has been demonstrated to result in an improvement in fecal incontinence (FI) severity; however, there is a paucity of data addressing the differential impact of FI on the quality of life (QOL) and results of diagnostic testing across BMI categories. We wished to evaluate symptom distress, QOL, and diagnostic testing parameters among normal, overweight, and obese women with fecal incontinence.

METHODS

Women undergoing evaluation for FI between 2003 and 2012 were identified. Participants completed validated, symptom-specific distress, impact, and general QOL measures including the Modified Manchester Questionnaire (MMHQ), which includes the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), and the mental and physical component summary scores, MCS and PCS, respectively, of the Short Form-12. Anorectal manometry measures were also included. Multivariate regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Participants included 407 women with a mean age ± SD of 56 ± 13. Multivariate analyses revealed no differences in symptom-specific distress and impact as measured by MMHQ, MCS, and PCS across BMI groups; however, obese women had increased resting and squeeze pressures compared with normal and overweight BMI women (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001; p = 0.007 and p = 0.004 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Obese women with FI did not have more general impact and symptom-specific distress and impact on quality of life compared with normal and overweight women. Obese women with FI had higher baseline anal resting and squeeze pressures suggesting a lower threshold to leakage with pressure increases.

[Obesity and urogynecology: a systematic review]

OBJECTIVES

To determine the specificity of the management of urogynecologic disorders in obese women.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

obesity, genital prolapse, pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence, anal incontinence.

RESULTS

The relative risk of urinary incontinence (UI) for morbidly obese women (BMI>40 kg/m(2)) is five times greater than a normal weight woman. A 10% weight loss reduced the frequency of urinary leakage by 50%. Beyond a BMI of 35 kg/m(2), the success rate of suburethral sling decreased to 50% with an increased risk of de novo urgenturies. Within this population of morbidly obese women, bariatric surgery was as successful as or more than surgery for incontinence. Patients with morbid obesity are three times as likely to experience anal incontinence, with a prevalence reaching 32%. The treatment of anal incontinence in obese patients is not clearly codified. The association between obesity and prolapse is very controversial according to the methodology used in the studies. Treatment of genital prolapse in obese women is little studied in the literature. Only sacrocolpopexy by laparotomy was studied. No more complications were found in this population.

CONCLUSION

Now we have specific data concerning urogynecology in obese women to better manage these patients.

Bowel habits and fecal incontinence in patients with obesity undergoing evaluation for weight loss: the importance of stool consistency

BACKGROUND

Fecal incontinence is highly prevalent in the general population and especially in risk groups. Obesity is also common and is associated with comorbidities that impair general health and interfere with daily activities. Identifying mutable factors for fecal incontinence, such as stool consistency, is of paramount importance to improve quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of fecal incontinence in patients with obesity undergoing evaluation for weight loss, its relationship with bowel habits, and its impact on quality of life.

DESIGN

This investigation is a cross-sectional observational study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted in patients with obesity who were undergoing evaluation for weight loss.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Fecal incontinence was defined as loss of flatus or liquid/solid stool occurring at least monthly. Data on comorbidities, BMI, quality of life, bowel habits including stool consistency measured with the Bristol Stool Form Scale, and symptoms of fecal incontinence were collected.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were included, with a mean BMI of 39.6 kg/m2. Symptoms of fecal incontinence were found in 17 patients (32.7%): flatus in 9 of 17 (52.9%), liquid stool in 6 of 17 (35.2%), and solid stool in 2 of 17 (11.7%). No differences were found between patients with and without fecal incontinence in age, sex, comorbidities, or BMI. Health-related quality of life was lower in patients with fecal incontinence than in those without, but this difference was not significant, with the exception of the dimensions of role-physical (p = 0.03) and social functioning (p = 0.04). Patients with incontinence reported significantly higher percentages of altered bowel habits with nonformed stools (p = 0.004).

LIMITATIONS

The cross-sectional design hampered identification of the time at which the impact of obesity occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Fecal incontinence is common in patients with obesity. Stool consistency was significantly different in these patients. This study supports the possibility of improving incontinence during weight loss by modifying stool consistency.

Clinical and instrumental evaluation of pelvic floor disorders before and after bariatric surgery in obese women

BACKGROUND

Obesity, well known as a risk factor for several diseases, can also lead to pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). However, scant data are available regarding PFD in obese individuals. Our study was designed to assess the prevalence, severity, and the quality of life (QOL) effect of PFD in obese women before and after bariatric surgery at a university hospital in Italy.

METHODS

A total of 100 obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m(2)) women completed 6 validated specific and QOL questionnaires about PFD. The patients were evaluated by physical examination, endoanal ultrasonography, rectal balloon distension test, and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Of the 100 patients, 87 were reassessed 12 months after bariatric surgery.

RESULTS

The prevalence of PFD was 81%, and 49% of patients reported that their symptoms adversely affected their QOL. Urinary incontinence (UI) was the most common disorder (61%) and was associated with the BMI (P = .04). Fecal incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse symptoms were reported by 24 and 56 patients, respectively. Urogenital prolapse and rectocele was documented in 15% and 74% of patients, respectively. After a mean BMI reduction of 10 kg/m(2), the prevalence of PFD decreased to 48% (P = .02), with a significant improvement in QOL. The prevalence of UI decreased to 9.2% (P = .0001) and was associated with the decrease in postoperative BMI (P = .04). The rate of resolution of the symptoms was 84%, 85%, and 74% for UI, fecal incontinence, and pelvic organ prolapse, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In the present sample of obese women, PFD was common and adversely affected their QOL. A clear association was found between the BMI and UI. Weight loss resulted in improved UI, fecal incontinence, and symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse.

Obesity and bariatric surgery: a systematic review of associations with defecatory dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Obesity rates are rapidly growing in the developed world. While upper gastrointestinal disturbances and urinary incontinence are independently associated with obesity, the relationship between obesity and defecatory dysfunction is less well defined.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the literature on faecal incontinence, diarrhoea and constipation in obese patients and its effects of bariatric surgery.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A Medline search was carried out on articles published from January 1966 to March 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Original articles on adult obese or morbidly obese patients were identified, including results following bariatric surgery that reported faecal incontinence, diarrhoea or constipation. Other forms of pelvic floor dysfunction were excluded. Main outcome measures included faecal incontinence, diarrhoea and constipation rates and their severity in obese patients and following bariatric surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty studies reported defecatory outcomes in obese patients (n = 14) and after bariatric surgery (n = 6). While constipation rates were similar, the rates of faecal incontinence and diarrhoea were higher in obese patients compared with non-obese patients. The exact rates of these conditions, and the correlations between body mass index (BMI) and faecal incontinence, diarrhoea and constipation, were not clear. Faecal incontinence improved after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in studies with preoperative data. The effects of bariatric surgery on diarrhoea were unclear.

CONCLUSION

Few studies have assessed the correlations between obesity and defecatory function and the effect of bariatric surgery. Studies were often not well controlled and used non-uniform instruments to assess bowel function. Obesity appears to be correlated with higher rates of faecal incontinence and diarrhoea. The effects of bariatric surgery on these conditions are not well defined. Well-controlled studies correlating outcome with physiological pelvic floor function are needed.

Weight loss improves fecal incontinence severity in overweight and obese women with urinary incontinence

INTRODUCTION/HYPOTHESIS

To estimate the effect of weight loss on fecal incontinence (FI) severity among overweight and obese women with urinary incontinence, we analyzed data from women randomized to a weight loss intervention or control condition.

METHODS

The modified Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) was administered at 6, 12, and 18 months in 338 women. Repeated measures analyses identified factors associated with improved FISI scores among women with baseline scores >0.

RESULTS

FISI scores improved in 45 (13%) across all time points among the 291 women (87%) completing the trial. Improved scores were associated with a one-point lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) score, p < 0.01. Improved liquid stool FI frequency was associated with ≥ 5 kg weight loss (p = 0.001), 10-g increase in fiber intake (p = 0.05), and decreased LUTS (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

FI severity improved with weight loss. Women with liquid stool FI losing at least 5 kg and/or increased dietary fiber intake had improved FI frequency.

Effect of body weight and esophageal damage on the severity of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Mexican GERD working group

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Several studies have demonstrated overweight and obesity are strong independent risk factors of GERD symptoms and esophageal erosions. Our aim was to analyze the joint effect of BMI with the grade of esophageal damage over symptoms' intensity of GERD.

METHODS

We used a questionnaire with a Likert scale for severity of symptoms related to GERD. The distal portion of the esophagus was evaluated to determine the presence of mucosal injury, classified by Los Angeles criteria (LA).

RESULTS

We included 917 subjects (53.76% females) with average age 36.8+/-7 years. Males had higher BMI than females (26.8+/-3.5 vs. 25.2+/-4.5, p<0.001). Severe damage (C-D ulcers) was associated with overweight (BMI 25-30), severity of heartburn,retching, halitosis, regurgitation, and chest oppression. BMI >30 had high score for heartburn and retching, but low score for nausea, compared with lower weight. The model with interaction showed a non-linear association between BMI and LA. Overweight (but not obese) patients with damage scored C-D had the highest score for intensity of heartburn and retching.

CONCLUSIONS

BMI and LA do not have additive effects on the severity of symptoms of GERD. Those with BMI between 25 and 30 had severe symptoms score, but those with BMI >30 showed lower scores. These findings could explain controversial results found in other studies.

Fecal incontinence in obese women with urinary incontinence: prevalence and role of dietary fiber intake

OBJECTIVE

This study estimates the prevalence of fecal incontinence (FI) in overweight and obese women with urinary incontinence and compares dietary intake in women with and without FI.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 336 incontinent and overweight women in the Program to Reduce Incontinence by Diet and Exercise clinical trial were included. FI was defined as monthly or greater loss of mucus, liquid, or solid stool. Dietary intake was quantified using the Block Food Frequency Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Women had a mean (+/- SD) age of 53 +/- 10 years, body mass index of 36 +/- 6 kg/m(2), and 19% were African American. Prevalence of FI was 16% (n = 55). In multivariable analyses, FI was independently associated with low fiber intake, higher depressive symptoms, and increased urinary tract symptoms (all P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Overweight and obese women report a high prevalence of monthly FI associated with low dietary fiber intake. Increasing dietary fiber may be a treatment for FI.

Effect of surgically induced weight loss on pelvic floor disorders in morbidly obese women

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of surgically induced weight loss on pelvic floor disorders (PFD) in morbidly obese women.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Although bariatric surgery may lead to the improvement of some obesity-related comorbidities, the resolution of global PFD has not been well described.

METHODS

Women with a body mass index (BMI) of 35 kg/m(2) or more who were considering bariatric surgery were asked to complete 2 validated condition-specific questionnaires assessing the distress/quality of life impact of PFD, total and by domain (pelvic organ prolapse, colorectal-anal, and urogenital). Women who achieved a > or =50% excess body weight loss after surgery were asked to complete the same questionnaires for comparison.

RESULTS

Of the 178 women who underwent surgery, 46 completed the postoperative questionnaires. Mean age of this group was 45 years (range, 20-67), and mean preoperative BMI was 45 kg/m(2) (range, 35-75). The prevalence of PFD symptoms improved from 87% before surgery to 65% after surgery (P = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.05%-53%). There was a significant reduction in total mean distress scores after surgery (P = 0.015, 95% CI: 3.3-32.9), which was attributed mainly to the significant decrease in urinary symptoms (P = 0.0002, 95% CI: 8.2-22.7). Reductions in the scores were noted for the other PFD domains as well. Quality of life total scores improved (P = 0.002, 95% CI: 4.8-27.1), as did scores in the urinary domain (P = 0.0005, 95% CI: 3.8-13.5) and the pelvic organ prolapse domain (P = 0.015, 95% CI: 0.6-9.5). Age, parity, history of complicated delivery, percent excess body weight loss, BMI, type of weight loss procedure and presence of diabetes mellitus and hypertension had no predictive value for postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Surgically induced weight loss has a beneficial effect on symptoms of PFD in morbidly obese women.