How to determine "ballooning" of the levator hiatus on clinical examination: a retrospective observational study

Epidural Anesthesia and Pelvic Floor Outcomes in Primiparas: A Retrospective Transperineal Ultrasound Study

PURPOSE

This study evaluated pelvic organ positions in primiparas with painful and painless deliveries using transperineal ultrasound (TPU) and assessed the effects of epidural anesthesia on pelvic floor function.

METHODS

From January 2022 to March 2023, 512 primiparas with vaginal deliveries at our hospital underwent pelvic floor ultrasound examinations 42 days postpartum. The study included 138 women with painful deliveries and 375 with painless deliveries. Measurements included the urethral tilt angle (UTA), retrovesical angle at rest (RVA-R), bladder neck-symphysis pubis distance (BSD) at rest, retrovesical angle at Valsalva maneuver (RVA-V), urethral rotation angle (URA), bladder neck descent (BND), rectal ampulla distance, and levator hiatal area (LHa) at maximum Valsalva maneuver. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the painful and painless delivery groups in terms of age, gestational age, newborn birth weight, BMI, UTA, RVA-R, RVA-V, URA, and BND (P > 0.05). Although the second stage and total duration of labor were significantly longer in the painless delivery group, there were no significant differences in the incidences of cystocele, internal urethral orifice opening, uterine prolapse, rectocele, and LHa expansion between the groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Transperineal ultrasound showed no significant difference in pelvic floor dysfunction incidence between primiparas with painful and painless deliveries. Epidural anesthesia did not significantly affect pelvic floor function in the early postpartum period.

Analysis of minimal levator ani hiatus area based on MRI in female adults without pelvic floor dysfunction at different age groups

PURPOSE

To investigate the association of minimal levator ani hiatus area with age in female adults without pelvic floor dysfunction.

METHODS

532 female subjects aged 18 ~ 90 years without pelvic floor dysfunction, divided into four groups (Group A, 18 ~ 29 years old; Group B, 30 ~ 39 years old; Group C, 40 ~ 49 years old; Group D, ≥ 50 years old) based on age, underwent traditional pelvic two-dimensional (2D) T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) axial to the body (AxB) for measuring the minimal levator ani hiatus area. 39 female volunteers were re-recruited to undergo both traditional pelvic 2D T2WI AxB and three-dimensional (3D) T2WI. An axial plane parallel to the direction of the puborectalis muscle (AxPRM) was acquired based on 3D T2WI. The difference of levator ani hiatus area measured on AxB and AxPRM images in 39 female volunteers was compared by one-sample t test, to verify if minimal levator ani hiatus area can be acquired on the traditional pelvic 2D T2WI AxB images. Spearman analysis evaluated the association of minimal levator ani hiatus area with age and the rank-sum test analyzed the area differences among four age groups.

RESULTS

Female age was positively correlated with minimal levator ani hiatus area (r = 0.23; p < 0.001). The minimal levator ani hiatus areas of 532 subjects were: 15.17 ± 1.77 cm2 in Group A, 15.52 ± 2.21 cm2 in Group B, 16.03 ± 2.16 cm2 in Group C, and 16.40 ± 2.10 cm2 in Group D. ANOVA showed significant statistical differences among four age groups (F = 7.519, p < 0.0001). Significant differences in minimal levator ani hiatus areas were found between Group A and Group C (p = 0.0491), Group A and Group D (p = 0.0007), and Group B and Group D (p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in minimal levator ani hiatus areas measured on AxB and AxPRM images in 39 female volunteers (p = 0.1000). There were no statistical difference in minimal levator ani hiatus areas between nulliparous and multiparous group for each age group (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a large sample, this study summarized the minimum levator ani hiatus area of female adults without pelvic floor dysfunction in different age groups. We found significant differences among different age groups. In addition, a positive correlation was found between age and the minimum levator ani hiatus area. These findings can provide reference criteria for diagnosing pelvic organ prolapse in female adults of different age groups.

Posterior compartment prolapse and perineal descent: systematic review of available support devices

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study is to systematically review the literature about available devices facilitating perineal support during defecation in patients with obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) and posterior pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODS

We searched for the terms "defecat/ion or ODS" and" pessar/ies or device/aid/tool/perineal/perianal/prolapse and support" in MEDLINE, PubMed and Web of Science. Data abstraction was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis) guidelines. A two-stage inclusion was performed, selecting first on title and abstract and secondly the full text. For variables with sufficient data, a meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Other variables were descriptively reported.

RESULTS

Ten studies out of 1332 were included for systematic review. The devices could be categorized into three groups: pessaries (n = 8), vaginal stent (n = 1) and external support device (n = 1). Methodology and data reporting is heterogeneous. Meta-analysis could be performed for the Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI-8) and Impact Questionnaire (CRAI-Q-7) in three pessary studies which showed a significant mean change. Significant improvement of stool evacuation was seen in two other pessary studies. The vaginal stent significantly decreases ODS. Subjective perception of constipation improved significantly using the posterior perineal support device.

CONCLUSION

All reviewed devices seem to improve ODS in patients with POP. There are no data on their efficacy with regard to perineal descent-associated ODS. There is a lack of comparative studies between devices. Studies are difficult to compare due to different inclusion criteria and evaluation tools.

Predictors of successful ring pessary use in women with pelvic organ prolapse

BACKGROUND

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common chronic health issue. Pessary rings are used for conservative management. To date, there is little evidence on objective anatomical findings as predictors of successful ring pessary management.

AIM

To determine any association between history, clinical and four-dimensional translabial ultrasound (TLUS)/pelvic floor ultrasound examination and pessary success.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From November 2013 to November 1015, all new patients presenting with symptomatic prolapse to a tertiary urogynaecological unit underwent an assessment including interview, clinical examination, that is, International Continence Society POPQ (pelvic organ prolapse quantification) and TLUS. Women with symptomatic prolapse were offered conservative management with a ring pessary. Those who agreed had a ring inserted that day. Successful trial of pessary use was defined as continued use for at least three months. Retrospective analysis of imaging data was performed blinded to other data. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the relationship between history, examination and imaging and pessary success.

RESULTS

Of 525 patients seen during the inclusion period, 177 had symptomatic prolapse. One hundred and twenty-eight were offered a pessary, 89 accepted. Five had incomplete data, leaving 84. Forty- Two (50%) were still using the pessary at a three-month follow-up. Predictors associated with failure included being pre-menopausal (P = 0.031), a previous hysterectomy (P = 0.051), increasing genital hiatus and perineal body (Gh + Pb) (P = 0.013), posterior compartment prolapse (P = 0.027) and a larger hiatal area on Valsalva on TLUS (P = 0.049). Pre-menopausal status (P = 0.003), increasing Gh + Pb (P = 0.011) and previous hysterectomy (P = 0.001) remained significant on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

A history of previous hysterectomy is a predictor of pessary failure as are Gh+Pb on Valsalva and premenopausal status.

Prevalence of levator hiatal overdistension after vacuum and forceps deliveries

INTRODUCTION

Levator ani avulsion rates after assisted vaginal delivery have been reported in the literature. However, there are no definitive data regarding the association between overdistention and assisted vaginal delivery. Therefore, our aim is to report overdistention rates after assisted vaginal delivery with a postpartum ultrasound examination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter study involved a retrospective analysis of data from primiparous women (n = 602) who had previously been recruited at three tertiary hospitals between January 2015 and January 2017. Overdistention was assessed at 6 months postpartum using three-/four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound. Patients with levator ani muscle avulsion were excluded. Overdistention was defined as a levator hiatal area ≥ 25 cm² on Valsalva.

RESULTS

Of the 602 primiparous patients, 250 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria (139 patients who underwent forceps delivery and 111 patients who underwent vacuum delivery) were evaluated. Overdistention occurred in 20% (50 of 250) of these patients. Overdistention was observed for 1% (1/111) of vacuum deliveries and 35.3% (49 of 139) of forceps deliveries. We found an increased risk of overdistention following forceps delivery compared to vacuum delivery, with a crude odds ratio (OR) of 59.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.1, 442.2) and an adjusted OR (adjusted for maternal age, second-stage duration, and head circumference) of 17.6 (95% CI: 2.3, 136.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Postpartum overdistention occurred for 20% of assisted vaginal deliveries, with an increased risk of overdistention following forceps delivery compared to vacuum delivery.

Morphometry of the nulliparous pelvic floor

OBJECTIVES

To describe morphometry of the pelvic floor in a large population of nulliparous women, comparing those with and those without pelvic pain. We also aimed to assess its association with characteristics such as age and body mass index (BMI).

METHODS

This was a prospective study performed between January 2013 and November 2015 in non-pregnant nulliparous women attending a general gynecology clinic. Following collection of demographic data, women were examined using translabial four-dimensional (4D) ultrasound. Dynamic volumes of pelvic floor muscle were obtained at rest, on maximal contraction and on Valsalva maneuver, and analyzed at a later date by an assessor blinded to demographic details. Standard measurements for each volume included levator hiatal area and anteroposterior and transverse diameters, and pubovisceral muscle length and width. Subanalysis was performed comparing women with and those without pelvic pain. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the association between characteristics, including age and BMI, and levator hiatal area at rest.

RESULTS

Three hundred and sixty eight nulliparous women were examined using translabial 4D ultrasound. Median levator hiatal area was 10.62 cm² at rest, 11.95 cm² on Valsalva maneuver and 8.18 cm² on maximal contraction. There was no difference between women with and those without pelvic pain when comparing biometric measurements of the pelvic floor musculature, except for in pubovisceral muscle width during the contraction phase. Regression analysis demonstrated that higher age and BMI were associated with increased levator hiatal area measurement.

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic floor morphometry in nulliparous women is unchanged by pelvic pain, but levator hiatal area is increased in women with higher BMI and age. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Should Genital Hiatus/Perineal Body Be Measured at Rest or on Valsalva?

OBJECTIVE

Genital hiatus (Gh) and perineal body (Pb) are part of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification assessment system, but it is unclear whether measurements should be taken at rest or on Valsalva. This study was designed to assess the predictive value of Gh and Pb measurements obtained at rest and on Valsalva for signs and symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study involving 416 women who presented to a tertiary urogynecology unit with symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction. Genital hiatus and Pb were measured at rest and on maximal Valsalva. The strength of association between binary markers of POP and measurements of Gh/Pb was estimated using logistic regression analysis. Receiver operator characteristic statistics were used to compare predictive values of Gh and Pb measurements obtained at rest and on Valsalva.

RESULTS

A total of 451 women were seen during the study period. Thirty-five were excluded owing to missing data, leaving 416. Fifty-four percent (n = 223) complained of POP symptoms. On examination, 80% (n = 332) had significant POP (stage 2+ in anterior or posterior compartments or stage 1+ in the central compartment). On imaging, significant POP was diagnosed in 66% (n = 275). Mean hiatal area was 22 cm (SD, 7; range, 5-49 cm) at rest and 30 cm (SD, 10; range, 11-69 cm) on Valsalva. Genital hiatus and Pb measured on Valsalva were consistently stronger predictors of prolapse symptoms and objective prolapse (by clinician examination and by ultrasound) than at Gh and Pb measured at rest. The corresponding area under the curve values were significantly larger for Gh/Pb measures on Valsalva after adjusting for multiple confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

Genital hiatus/Pb measured on maximal Valsalva is a superior predictor of symptoms and signs of POP compared with Gh/Pb at rest.

Can We Evaluate Hiatal Ballooning by Measuring the Anteroposterior Diameter With 2-Dimensional Translabial Ultrasonography?

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the association between the anteroposterior hiatal diameter and pelvic organ prolapse and to determine whether 2-dimensional translabial ultrasonography can evaluate hiatal ballooning by measuring the anteroposterior diameter.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of 312 women seen for lower urinary tract symptoms or pelvic organ prolapse between December 2014 and July 2016. All women had an International Continence Society (ICS) Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system examination and 4-dimensional translabial ultrasonography. The anteroposterior hiatal diameter was measured in the midsagittal plane, and the hiatal area was measured in the minimal axial plane during the maximal Valsalva maneuver.

RESULTS

Valid data from 294 patients were analyzed. International Continence Society POP-Q stage 0 was found in 121 women, stage 1 in 49, stage 2 in 78, stage 3 in 42, and stage 4 in 4. The anteroposterior diameter had an excellent linear correlation (r = 0.814; P < .001) with the hiatal area during the Valsalva maneuver and was strongly related to ICS POP-Q stages (P < .01). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis proposed a cutoff of 6.0 cm for the anteroposterior diameter against ICS POP-Q stage 2 and higher (sensitivity, 73%; specificity, 52%) and prolapse symptoms (sensitivity, 74%; specificity, 64%).

CONCLUSIONS

The anteroposterior hiatal diameter, which represents hiatal distensibility in the midsagittal plane, can be used to evaluate hiatal ballooning. "Mild" ballooning was defined as an anteroposterior diameter measurement of 6.0 to less than 6.5 cm, "moderate" ballooning as 6.5 to less than 7.0 cm, and "marked" ballooning as 7.0 cm or greater.

Warping of the levator hiatus: how significant is it?

OBJECTIVES

The levator hiatus is the largest potential hernial portal in the human body. Excessive distensibility is associated with female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Distension occurs not just laterally but also caudally, resulting in perineal descent and hiatal deformation or 'warping'. The aim of this study was to quantify the warping effect in symptomatic women, to validate the depth of the rendered volume used for the 'simplified method' of measuring hiatal dimensions and to determine predictors for the degree of warping.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study utilizing records of patients referred to a tertiary urogynecological service between November 2012 and March 2013. Patients underwent a standardized interview, clinical assessment using the POP quantification system of the International Continence Society and four-dimensional translabial ultrasound. The craniocaudal difference in the location of minimal distances in mid-sagittal and coronal planes was determined by offline analysis of ultrasound volumes, and provided a numerical measure of warping. We tested potential predictors, such as demographic factors, signs and symptoms of prolapse, levator avulsion and levator distensibility, for an association with warping.

RESULTS

Full datasets were available for 190 women. The mean craniocaudal difference in location of minimal distances in mid-sagittal and coronal planes was -1.26 mm (range, -6.7 to 4.6 mm; P < 0.001). This measure of warping was associated with hiatal area on Valsalva maneuver (r = - 0.284; P < 0.0001) and signs of significant prolapse on clinical and ultrasound examination (both P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The plane of minimal dimensions of the levator ani hiatus is non-Euclidean, i.e. warped, and the degree of warping is associated with hiatal distension, or 'ballooning', and with POP. However, the degree of warping is minor, the largest difference we found in the location of the plane of minimal dimensions being 6.7 mm. Hence, our results support the determination of hiatal area in a rendered volume of 1-2 cm in depth. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Genital hiatus size is associated with and predictive of apical vaginal support loss

BACKGROUND

Recognition and assessment of apical vaginal support defects remains a significant challenge in the evaluation and management of prolapse. There are several reasons that this is likely: (1) Although the Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification examination is the standard prolapse staging system used in the Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery field for reporting outcomes, this assessment is not used commonly in clinical care outside the subspecialty; (2) no clinically useful and accepted definition of apical support loss exists, and (3) no consensus or guidelines address the degree of apical support loss at which an apical support procedure should be performed routinely.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify a simple screening measure for significant loss of apical vaginal support.

STUDY DESIGN

This was an analysis of women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification stage 0-IV prolapse. Women with total vaginal length of ≥7 cm were included to define a population with "normal" vaginal length. Univariable and linear regression analyses were used to identify Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification points that were associated with 3 definitions of apical support loss: the International Consultation on Incontinence, the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network revised eCARE, and a Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification point C cut-point developed by Dietz et al. Linear and logistic regression models were created to assess predictors of overall apical support loss according to these definitions. Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated to determine test characteristics of the predictor variables and the areas under the curves were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 469 women, 453 women met the inclusion criterion. The median Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification stage was III, and the median leading edge of prolapse was +2 cm (range, -3 to 12 cm). By stage of prolapse (0-IV), mean genital hiatus size (genital hiatus; mid urethra to posterior fourchette) increased: 2.0 ± 0.5, 3.0 ± 0.5, 4.0 ± 1.0, 5.0 ± 1.0, and 6.5 ± 1.5 cm, respectively (P < .01). Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification points B anterior, B posterior, and genital hiatus had moderate-to-strong associations with overall apical support loss and all definitions of apical support loss. Linear regression models that predict overall apical support loss and logistic regression models predict apical support loss as defined by International Continence Society, eCARE, and the point C; cut-point definitions were fit with points B anterior, B posterior, and genital hiatus; these 3 points explained more than one-half of the model variance. Receiver operator characteristic analysis for all definitions of apical support loss found that genital hiatus >3.75 cm was highly predictive of apical support loss (area under the curve, >0.8 in all models).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing genital hiatus size is associated highly with and predictive of apical vaginal support loss. Specifically, the Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification measurement genital hiatus of ≥3.75 cm is highly predictive of apical support loss by all study definitions. This simple measurement can be used to screen for apical support loss and the need for further evaluation of apical vaginal support before planning a hysterectomy or prolapse surgery.