Economics of pelvic organ prolapse surgery

A systematic review of the surgical management of apical pelvic organ prolapse

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

This systematic review (PROSPERO:CRD42022275789) is aimed at comparing qualitatively the success, recurrence, and complication rates of sacrocolpopexy with concomitant hysterectomy, hysteropexy, sacrospinous fixation (SSF) with and without vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and uterosacral fixation (USF) with and without VH.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed using Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for studies published from 2011, on women with apical pelvic organ prolapse requiring surgical interventions. Risk of bias was assessed via the National Institutes of Health study quality assessment tool. The primary outcomes are the success and recurrence rate of each technique, for ≥12 months' follow-up. Findings were summarised qualitatively.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies were included. Overall significant findings for a high success and low recurrence rate are summarised as: minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISC) is superior to abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC); sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSHP) is superior to USF + VH, which is superior to uterosacral hysteropexy and mesh hysteropexy (MHP). Significant findings related to complications include: MISC recorded a lower overall complication rate than ASC except in mesh exposure; USF + VH tends to perform better than SSHP and SSF, with SSHP performing better than MHP in faecal incontinence and overactive bladder rates.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence to conclude that hysterectomy is superior to uterine-sparing approaches. MISC should be considered over ASC given similar efficacy and reduced complications. Superiority of MHP is unproven against native tissue hysteropexy. Further studies under standardised settings are required for direct comparisons between the surgical management methods.

Quantifying the physiologic motions of the pelvic viscera during evacuation in nulligravid asymptomatic women

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is often diagnosed during an in-office examination, which looks for motion of the vaginal wall while performing a strain maneuver. It is believed that the pelvic organs in adequately supported women are relatively stationary. This study was aimed at investigating the physiological displacements of pelvic organs using MR defecography.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included 19 volunteers. Midsagittal slices representing rest and the maximum movement of the posterior vaginal fornix during three maneuvers were identified. Normalized axes for analysis were defined as the x' (line connecting the inferior-posterior-most point on the pubic symphysis to the anterior edge of the sacrococcygeal joint) and the y' (line orthogonal to the x axis that passed through the sacral promontory). The positions of the posterior vaginal fornix, mid-vagina, bladder neck, anorectal junction, and hymen were recorded. These subjects were then analyzed using the current radiological grading system of POP to determine any overlap between asymptomatic subjects and diagnostic ranges of POP.

RESULTS

Evacuation caused the most motion in the landmarks. The majority of the motion of the landmarks was along the y axis. The posterior vaginal fornix experienced significant descent (125% of the initial distance) without much anterior-posterior translation (7% of the initial distance) during defecation. All landmarks experienced similar trends.

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown that there is significant rotational motion of the pelvic organs around the pubic bone in adequately supported women. This motion when described using radiological grading is likely to be considered mild or moderate prolapse, which may contribute to overdiagnosis of POP.

A preliminary clinical report of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the treatment of moderate and severe pelvic organ prolapse

Objective

To study the efficacy and safety of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the treatment of moderate and severe pelvic organ prolapse.

Design

Patients were selected into this study on a voluntary basis to evaluate the short-term efficacy of this surgery by comparing the OP-Q scores before the operation, three months after the operation, and six months after the operation.

Setting and Patients

Evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety by a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of the 18 patients with POP-Q grade III–IV pelvic organ prolapse treated by the Department of Gynecology of Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital from April 2020 to November 2020, and their post-operation follow-ups.

Interventions

Patients with postoperative follow-ups found no obvious relapse without intervention measures.

Measurements and Main Results

The transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation was performed successfully, and the anterior and posterior walls of vagina and/or trans-vaginal hysterectomy were repaired as appropriate. Except the total vaginal length (TVL), the P values of numerical analysis for all points before, three months after, and six months after the operation were all <0.05, being statistically significant.

Conclusion

This method is effective in the treatment of moderate and severe pelvic organ prolapse with few complications, but more cases and longer-term follow-up data are needed to determine the long-term effect of this procedure. For the selection of puncture sites, more anatomical data are needed to get more accurate result.

Development of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse over 10 years of mid-life follow-up is affected by occupational lifting and/or pushing for parous women

OBJECTIVE

To document the risk of new-onset symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) among perimenopausal women and examine whether occupational lifting and/or pushing is a risk factor in the development of POP over a 10-year follow-up window.

STUDY DESIGN

Secondary analysis of prospective, longitudinal data from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) cohort study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We analyzed women with current employment at the start of SWAN who were followed annually during mid-life. At baseline, women self-reported the frequency of occupational lifting and pushing, which was classified as Never, Infrequent (less than half the time), or Frequent (half the time or more) occupational lifting and/or pushing. Women were asked about new-onset symptomatic POP from the second to tenth annual follow-up. Modified Poisson regression was used to quantify crude and adjusted risk ratios (RRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for POP according to load-bearing categories. Parous women were modelled separately, as initial analyses suggested effect modification by parity status.

RESULTS

In our sample of 1590 parous women, 8.2 % reported new-onset symptomatic POP over 10 years of follow-up. Multivariable analysis revealed that Infrequent (aRR 1.51, 95 % CI 1.04-2.20) and Frequent (aRR 2.03, 95 % CI 1.29-3.17) occupational lifting and/or pushing were associated with the development of POP.

CONCLUSION

Frequent occupational lifting and/or pushing significantly increased parous women's risk of developing POP symptoms. This strengthens existing evidence that occupational exposures can be risk factors for POP. Gender-based education and prevention strategies in the workplace and in primary health care are necessary to reduce the burden of this condition for mid-life women.

Pelvic organ prolapse following hysterectomy on benign indication: a nationwide, nulliparous cohort study

BACKGROUND

Hysterectomy is commonly performed and may increase the risk of pelvic organ prolapse. Previous studies in parous women have shown an increased risk of pelvic organ prolapse surgery after hysterectomy. Parity is a strong risk factor for pelvic organ prolapse and may confuse the true relation between hysterectomy and pelvic organ prolapse.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether hysterectomy performed for benign conditions other than pelvic organ prolapse leads to an increased risk of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in a cohort of nulliparous women.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a historical matched cohort study based on a nationwide population of nulliparous women born in 1947 to 2000 and living in Denmark during 1977 to 2018 (N=549,197). The data were obtained from the Danish Civil Registration System, the Danish National Patient Registry, the Fertility Register, and Statistics Denmark. Women who had a hysterectomy performed in 1977 to 2018 were included in the study (n=9535). For each of these women we randomly retrieved five nonhysterectomized women matched on age and calendar year to constitute the reference group (n=47,370). Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to compare the risk of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the 2 groups of women.

RESULTS

The study included 56,905 women whom we observed for up to 42 years, entailing 809,435 person-years in risk. Overall, 9535 women who underwent a hysterectomy were matched individually with 47,370 reference women. Subsequently, a total of 29 women (30.4%) who underwent a hysterectomy and 85 reference women (17.9%) had a pelvic organ prolapse surgery performed, corresponding to incidence rates of 20.5 and 12.7 per 100,000 risk years, respectively. In addition, the risk of pelvic organ prolapse surgery increased by 60% in women who underwent a hysterectomy compared with women in the reference group (crude hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.5; P=.04; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.5; P=.04). After the exclusion of women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy and their matches, the results were significantly the same (crude hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.4; P=.05). Furthermore, we found higher rates of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in women who had a subtotal hysterectomy, total hysterectomy, or vaginal and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomies than in women in the reference group.

CONCLUSION

Hysterectomy increased the risk of pelvic organ prolapse surgery for nulliparous women by 60%. Previous studies of multiparous women have similarly shown an increased risk of prolapse after hysterectomy. As the most common risk factor for pelvic organ prolapse-vaginal birth-was not included and women were >72 years of age in this study, the numbers of pelvic organ prolapse surgeries were low. Despite the low absolute risk of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in nulliparous women, they were important in investigating the association between hysterectomy and pelvic organ prolapse, excluding vaginal birth, which is the most common risk factor for pelvic organ prolapse. As this cohort study of nulliparous women found an increased risk of pelvic organ prolapse surgery after hysterectomy, it is implied that the uterus per se protects against pelvic organ prolapse. As such, gynecologists should be aware of the risks associated with hysterectomy, and alternative uterus-sparing treatments should be considered when possible. Furthermore, women should be informed about the risks before being offered a hysterectomy.

Wound dehiscence prevalence and relationship with prosthetic material extrusion in women underwent anterior colpotomy

Aim:

To assess the prevalence of anterior vaginal wall dehiscence in women who underwent anterior vaginal wall colpotomy for pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence and to evaluate the influence of suture materials and techniques on wound dehiscence.

Materials and Methods:

This multicenter, prospective study enrolled naïve women for urogynecological surgery affected by anterior vaginal wall defect or stress urinary incontinence. Performed surgical procedures were anterior vaginal wall repair (AVWR) with native tissue (N-AVWR) or polypropylene mesh (M-AVWR), trans-obturator polypropylene in-out middle urethral sling (MUS). Used suture materials were Vicryl 2-0, Vicryl Rapide 2-0, and Monocryl 3-0. Suture techniques were running interlocking or interrupted. Follow-up was performed daily during hospitalization and in outpatient clinic after 10–14, 30 days, and after 3 months.

Results:

A total of 1139 patients were enrolled. AVWR were 790: 89.1% N-AVWR, and 10.9% M-AVWR. Polypropylene MUS were 349. Women with prosthetic implantation were 38.2%, while 61.8% had native tissue repair. Overall Vicryl was used in 53.9%, Vicryl Rapide in 37.4%, and Monocryl in 8.7%. Overall running interlocking sutures were 66.5%, while interrupted were 33.5%. Overall wound dehiscence prevalence was 0.9% (10/1139). Wound dehiscence rate of 0.6% (5/790) was documented in AVWR: 0.3% (2/704) in N-AVWR, and 3.5% (3/86) in M-AVWR. Among women underwent MUS, 1.4% (5/349) showed wound dehiscence. In patients who underwent prosthetic surgery, the overall dehiscence prevalence was 1.8% (8/435). A statistically significant higher rate of wound dehiscence was found in women with implanted prosthetic materials.

Discussion:

We reported for the first time the prevalence of wound dehiscence in females who underwent colpotomy for AVWR or MUS. Wound dehiscence occurrence was low, but non-negligible. We found that this complication was poorly associated to the suture methods and materials, while prosthetic material represented a risk factor for wound healing.

Same-Day Discharge After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Is Feasible, Safe, and Associated With High Patient Satisfaction

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the incidence of adverse events and postoperative health care resource utilization, as well as to determine satisfaction in patients after a same-day discharge (SDD) protocol compared with routine care (discharge ≥postoperative day 1).

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study of SDD after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Eligibility criteria included age younger than 80 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I/II, caretaker for ≥24 hours postoperatively, and surgical start before 1 pm. Perioperative data were obtained through the medical record and direct patient inquiry. A satisfaction survey was administered at the postoperative visit. A historical control group was used to compare outcomes.

RESULTS

Forty-seven women met the eligibility criteria. Mean age was 62 (±9) years. Most were White (95.7%), were overweight (body mass index, 27.7 ± 5.5 kg/m2), and had stage 3 prolapse (63.8%). Same-day discharge was achieved for 37 patients (78.7%). Patient characteristics of the SDD cohort were similar to the routine-care cohort, with the exception of previous hysterectomy (57.5% vs 100.0%, P < 0.001) and the American Society of Anesthesiologists score (2 [1-2] vs 2 [1-3], P = 0.002). There were significantly fewer postoperative telephone calls in the SDD cohort but no other differences in health care resource utilization. Adverse events did not differ between groups. The SDD cohort reported high satisfaction and would recommend SDD to family or friends independent of whether or not SDD was achieved (91.9% vs 80.0%, P = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 80% of women undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy on an SDD protocol went home as planned. Compared with routine care, there was no increase in adverse events or postoperative health care resource utilization. Patient satisfaction in the SDD cohort was high.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Same-day discharge after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03730103?term=same+day+discharge&cntry=US&state=US%3AOH&city=Cleveland&draw=2&rank=1; NCT03730103.

Readmissions and perioperative outcomes for same-day versus next-day discharge after prolapse surgery

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

We aimed to evaluate the safety of same-day discharge (SDD) compared with next-day discharge (NDD) after prolapse surgery on a national level hypothesizing that readmission and complication rates after SDD would not be higher than NDD.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database including 2014-2018. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify minimally invasive apical suspensions or obliterative procedures. Exclusion criteria were length of stay > 1 day, unrelated concomitant procedures, serious medical comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class >2, and complication during index admission. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission, and secondary outcomes included 30-day complications.

RESULTS

12,583 were included in analysis. SDD rate was 16.7%. The majority of women were white (91%) with a mean age of 59 years and mean body mass index of 28 kg/m². Medical comorbidities were similar between the SDD and NDD groups. Overall incidence of 30-day readmission was 1.7%. SDD had lower odds of 30-day readmission than NDD (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.98). SDD had lower odds of 30-day complications but this failed to reach statistical significance (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.44-1.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, 30-day readmission and complication rates were not higher after SDD compared to NDD in women undergoing minimally-invasive apical suspension or obliterative procedures. We interpret these findings carefully given study limitations but believe our findings support the safety of SDD after minimally invasive apical suspension or obliterative procedures in a low-risk population.

Long-term efficacy of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension for middle-compartment defect-based pelvic organ prolapse

Background

We aim to assess the long-term efficacy of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension (HUS) procedure for middle compartment defect-based pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of 84 women with middle-compartment defect-based POP who underwent transvaginal HUS as the primary surgical treatment without mesh augmentation from January 2007 to January 2019. All 84 patients manifested ≥ grade-II middle-compartment defect-based POP. Follow-up visits were performed 2, 6 and 12 months after surgery and then annually, including questionnaires and clinical examination using pelvic organ prolapse quantitation system (POP-Q). Surgical success required to fulfill all three of these criteria: (I) anterior or posterior vaginal wall prolapsed the leading edge of 0 cm or less and apex of 1/2 total vaginal length or less; (II) the absence of POP symptoms as reported on the PFDI-20 question No. 3 (“do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in your vaginal area?”); and (III) no prolapse re-operations or pessary use during the study period.

Results

Of 84 women, 56 cases (66.7%, 56/84) were evaluated at a ≥5-year follow-up. The 5-year recurrence rates for patients with prolapse of either the anterior vaginal wall, vaginal vault, or posterior vaginal wall, or prolapses in multiple sites, were 7.1% (4/56), 0, 1.8% (1/56), and 3.6% (2/56), respectively. The surgery success rate was 87.5% (49/56). None of the recurrent women underwent retreatment. The satisfaction rate was 91.1% (51/56).

Conclusions

Transvaginal HUS without mesh augmentation is a safe and effective procedure in the surgical treatment of patients with middle-compartment defects. Anatomical, functional, and subjective outcomes were very satisfactory.

Economic evaluation of elective cesarean versus vaginal delivery on cost of future pelvic floor disorders in the United States

AIM

To analyze the cost impact of cesarean versus vaginal delivery in the United States on the development of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODS

We compared average cost of delivery method to the lifetime risk and cost of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) in women < 65 years. Costs of maternal care, obtained from the MarketScan® database, included those incurred at delivery and 3 months post-partum. Future costs of PFDs included those incurred after delivery up to 65 years. Previously reported data on the prevalence of POP and SUI following cesarean and vaginal delivery was used to calculate attributable risk. An incremental cost of illness model was used to estimate costs for SUI. Direct surgical and ambulatory care costs were used to determine cost of POP.

RESULTS

Average estimated cost was $7089 for vaginal delivery and $9905 for cesarean delivery. The absolute risks for SUI and POP were estimated as 7% and 5%, respectively, following cesarean delivery, and 13% and 14%, respectively, following vaginal delivery. For SUI, average direct cost was $5642, indirect cost was $4208, and personal cost was $750. Average direct cost of POP surgery was $4658, and nonsurgical cost was $2220. The potential savings for reduced prevalence of SUI and POP in women who underwent cesarean delivery is estimated at $1255, but they incur an additional $2816 maternal care cost over vaginal delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Although elective cesarean is associated with reduced prevalence of PFDs, the increased initial cost of cesarean delivery does not offset future cost savings.

Clinical outcomes and uroflowmetry assessment in patients with apical prolapse after laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to evaluate the voiding function and voiding dysfunction 3 months after laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS). We identified risk factors for postoperative voiding dysfunction.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective study included 57 women with apical prolapse who underwent LUSLS with stage II or greater apical prolapse and without advanced anterior vaginal prolapse (stage III or IV). Data were collected from electronic medical records. Voiding function was assessed by uroflowmetry, PVR examination, and self-report questionnaires (the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 and the Urinary Impact Questionnaire) at baseline and 3 months after surgery. Voiding dysfunction was defined as an average flow rate (Qave)＜10 ml/s, a maximum flow rate (Qmax)＜15 ml/s, or a postvoid residual volume (PVR)＞50 ml. Statistical analyses were performed using paired-sample t tests, χ2 tests, and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Thirty-five percent of women suffered from voiding dysfunction preoperatively. Uroflowmetry parameters and PVR, objective symptoms including voiding difficulties, incomplete empty, frequency and urinary incontinence didn't show significant improvement postoperatively (all p＞0.05). Low Q_ave was identified as an independent risk factor of post voiding dysfunction (odds ratio, 0.558; 95 % CI, 0.324-0.963).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-third of women suffering from apical prolapse without advanced anterior vaginal wall had evidence of voiding dysfunction preoperatively. LUSLS has no obvious effect on uroflowmetry parameters and clinical symptoms.

Comparison of two natural tissue repair-based surgical techniques; sacrospinous fixation and uterosacral ligament suspension for pelvic organ prolapse treatment

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

The present study aims to compare the effectiveness and perioperative results of the natural tissue repair-based treatments sacrospinous fixation (SSF) and uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) based on the preoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of patients with stage ≥2 uterine prolapse between January 2011 and December 2016 were retrospectively examined. Preoperative POP-Q stages, demographic characteristics, perioperative results, and recurrence ratios in mid-term follow-up for patients were compared.

RESULTS

Overall, 235 patients were determined according to our study's inclusion criteria. A total of 155 patients underwent vaginal hysterectomy and USLS (VH/USLS), whereas 80 patients underwent vaginal hysterectomy and SSF (VH/SSF). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of body mass index (BMI), age, and parity as well as cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus. There was no significant difference in terms of anatomical success and clinical success rates in the postoperative follow-up period between both groups. (p = 0.588 and 0.692, respectively). However, the assessment of results based on preoperative stages of patients revealed that recurrence and anatomical failure were higher in the stage 4 group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that the main determinant factor in evaluating recurrence rates is preoperative POP-Q staging of the patient. Recurrence rates significantly increase with disease stage. Consistent with studies that do not report a clear superiority for USLS or SSF, we observed no significant differences between both procedures in terms of recurrence. The effectiveness of these procedures is similar. We believe that prospective, long-term follow-up studies with larger populations are required to accurately identify preoperative risk factors and compare them with mesh techniques.

Traditional McCall culdoplasty compared to a modified McCall technique with double ligament suspension: anatomical and clinical outcomes

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

This study compared anatomical and clinical outcomes of traditional McCall culdoplasty versus a modified McCall technique with double ligament suspension (DLS).

METHODS

This retrospective study presents outcomes of 68 patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy and vaginal suspension for apical prolapse ≥ stage II according to the POP-Q score system, at, between January 2016 and February 2018. In 34 women vaginal cuff suspension was obtained with traditional McCall culdoplasty (McCall group), while in 34 women we performed a modified McCall, which consists of a double ligament suspension (DLS group), suspending the vaginal cuff to uterosacral ligaments and also to adnexal peduncles. Primary outcome was prolapse recurrence ≥ stage II according to the POP-Q system. Fisher's, Mann-Whitney U and Student's t tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences among patients' preoperative characteristics, operative time, blood loss or postoperative complications. Follow-up mean duration was 23.2 ± 6.7 and 22.4 ± 8.7 months in the McCall and DLS group, respectively. Prolapse recurrence occurred in 11 (32.3%) women in the McCall group versus 2 (5.9%) women in the DLS group (p < 0.05): among them, 2 patients (5.9%) in the McCall group and 1 (2.9%) in the DLS group required further treatment. Total vaginal length was 6.1 ± 0.9 cm in the McCall group versus 6.9 ± 0.7 cm in the DLS group (p < 0.001). No statistical difference in quality of life assessment was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

DLS group patients had better anatomical outcomes and lower recurrence rates than McCall group patients, without increasing operative time or complications. A prospective study with more cases is needed to confirm our data.

Robotic-assisted repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a scoping review of the literature

The purpose of this article is to perform a scoping review of the medical literature regarding the efficacy, safety, and cost of robotic-assisted procedures for repair of pelvic organ prolapse in females. Sacrocolpopexy is the “gold standard” repair for apical prolapse for those who desire to maintain their sexual function, and minimally-invasive approaches offer similar efficacy with fewer risks than open techniques. The introduction of robotic technology has significantly impacted the field, converting what would have been a large number of open abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) procedures to a minimally-invasive approach in the United States. Newer techniques such as nerve-sparing dissection at the sacral promontory, use of the iliopectineal ligaments and natural orifice vaginal sacrocolpopexy may improve patient outcomes. Prolapse recurrence is consistently noted in at least 10% of patients regardless of route of mesh placement. Ancillary factors including pre-operative prolapse stage, retention of the cervix, type of mesh implant, and genital hiatus (GH) size all adversely affect surgical efficacy, while trainees do not. Minimally-invasive apical repair procedures are suited to early recovery after surgery protocols but may not be appropriate for all patients. Studies evaluating longer-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexies are needed to understand the relative risk/benefit ratio of this technique. With several emerging robotic platforms with improved features and a focus on decreasing costs, the future of robotics seems bright.

Efficacy and safety outcomes after genital prolapse repair by the vaginal route using the Avaulta Plus® mesh

OBJECTIVE(S)

With aging population, a rise in anterior wall prolapse surgery is expected. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of genital prolapse repair by the vaginal route using a mixed polypropylene and porcine skin mesh (Avaulta Plus®).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study conducted at Tenon University Hospital, Paris, France. We included seventy-nine women who underwent anterior wall prolapse repair using Avaulta Plus® mesh by the transobturator route for genital prolapse ≥ stage II from September 2008 to December 2017. Pre- and postoperative pelvic organ prolapse classification, functional symptoms, quality of life scores were evaluated, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The anatomical success rate for anterior wall prolapse was 97 %. The postoperative complication rate was 29.1 % among which the mesh exposure rate was 7.6 %. Pelvic symptoms such as vaginal discomfort and pelvic heaviness were significantly improved (p < 0.01). Voiding dysfunction were significantly improved (p < 0.01). A significant improvement in the PFDI-20 score (p < 0.01) and PFIQ-7 score (p < 0.01) was observed. After 3 years of follow-up, the recurrence rate was 12 %.

CONCLUSION(S)

Prolapse repair using the Avaulta Plus® mesh is effective and results in a significant improvement in quality of life. The complication rate, including mesh exposure, is acceptable.

Polymorphism rs1800255 from COL3A1 gene and the risk for pelvic organ prolapse

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Genetic variations of type III collagen may compromise the supportive structures of the female pelvic floor and consequently favor pelvic organ prolapse. The single nucleotide polymorphism G/A rs1800255 located in the coding region for type III collagen (COL3A1) was evaluated as a risk factor for pelvic organ prolapse.

METHODS

A single-center prospective cohort study including women with clinical diagnosis of stage III and IV prolapse (POP group) and prolapse stage 0 or I (control group). Sociodemographic, clinical data and obstetric history were retrieved by physician interview. DNA including the rs1800255 polymorphism was amplified by polymerase chain reaction from blood genomic cells and digested with AluI restriction enzyme for distinction of G and A variants. Qualitative variables were compared using the chi-square and Fisher's exact tests and unpaired t-test for quantitative variables. After stratification of the groups, risk factors for POP were estimated using odds ratios (ORs) from the binary logistic regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 292 women were included, 112 in the POP group and 180 in the control group. There was no significant difference between groups regarding rs1800255. Age and home birth were the only significant risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse.

CONCLUSION

Polymorphism rs1800255 from COL3A1 gene was not a risk factor for pelvic organ prolapse.

Outcomes of Transvaginal High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension: Over 500-Patient Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND

Uterosacral ligament (USL) suspension is a safe and effective procedure in terms of anatomical, functional, and subjective outcomes for primary surgical treatment of prolapse.

OBJECTIVES

There has been a renewed interest toward native tissue prolapse repair by vaginal route because of low cost and lack of mesh-related complications. Uterosacral ligaments are considered safe, effective, and durable as suspending structures for primary surgical repair of the apical compartment. Our aim was to evaluate complications, anatomical, functional and subjective outcomes of high USL suspension for primary prolapse repair.

METHODS

Data of patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy followed by high USL suspension for pelvic organ prolapse were retrospectively analyzed. Operative data, as well as complications, were recorded. Anatomical recurrence was defined as descent of any compartment stage II or greater according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system. Functional outcomes focused on urinary, bowel, and sexual dysfunctions. International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form, Wexner, and Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaires were collected.

RESULTS

Data of 533 women were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 32 (SD, 19) months (dropout rate, 2.6%). Most frequent complication was ureteral kinking (2.6%). Total recurrence rate was 13.7%, with anterior compartment being the most frequent (9.4%), whereas reoperation for symptomatic prolapse recurrence was required in only 1% of patients. Improvement of urinary incontinence, voiding dysfunction, constipation, and dyspareunia was observed. Overall subjective satisfaction was high (Patient Global Impression of Improvement score, 1.3), ranging from "much improved" to "very much improved."

CONCLUSIONS

Uterosacral ligament suspension is a safe and effective procedure in primary surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Anatomical, functional, and subjective outcomes were very satisfactory, and reoperation rate for recurrence was only 1%.

Prospective evaluation of paravaginal defect repair with and without apical suspension: a 6-month postoperative follow-up with MRI, clinical examination, and questionnaires

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Paravaginal defect (PVD) has been suggested as one of the main contributors to the development of prolapse in the anterior vaginal wall (AVW). We aimed to evaluate the descent of pelvic organs, presence of vaginal H configuration, and pubococcygeus (PC) muscle defect by pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), together with subjective symptoms of prolapse, before and 6 months after PVD repair. We also aimed to evaluate risk factors of recurrence.

METHODS

Fifty women with PVD diagnosed by gynecological examination and scheduled for vaginal PVD repair were planned for enrollment. Preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively, subjective symptoms were evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS) together with MRI of the pelvis to evaluate defects in the PC muscle, vaginal shape, and pelvic organ descent.

RESULTS

Forty-six women completed the study. Twenty had PVD repair alone, whereas 26 also had concomitant surgery performed. Prolapse grade, subjective symptoms, sexual problems, and quality of life (QoL) were significantly improved at follow-up. Missing vaginal H configuration was observed in 21 women before operation and was correlated with PC muscle defect. Recurrence rate was 39%, and significantly more women with recurrence had PC muscle defects and missing H configuration.

CONCLUSION

Vaginal PVD repair alone or combined with concomitant surgery significantly reduces objective prolapse and subjective symptoms. We could not demonstrate MRI findings of missing H configuration to be a sign of PVD but, rather, a sign of defect in the PC muscle. Risk of recurrence is significantly higher in women with major PC muscle defects and missing H configuration.

[The gynecological pessary: Is it really a device of another age, a fig leaf?]

OBJECTIVES

The use of pessary to put back up prolapsed organs to their normal position dates back prior to several millennia. This work aims to discuss its place in our clinical practice through an updated bibliographic review and emphasizes a hands-on approach to pessary fitting and management in terms of indication, pessary type selection, device' size, insertion, removal, follow-up visits and care.

METHODS

A review of the literature, in the light of the latest publications and recommendations of French and international learned societies, as well as our own experience, were analyzed.

RESULTS

This device appears to be as effective as surgical management to relieve symptoms related to urogenital prolapse and restore body image. It can be used temporarily, awaiting a surgical solution or as a therapeutic test (mimicking the effect of a surgical procedure to predict its functional outcome or identifying a masked urinary incontinence). It can also represent an alternative to surgery (patient choice, women who wish to complete childbearing or who are unsuitable for surgery because of medical comorbidities) and thus can be used in first intention. However, despite its moderate cost and its harmlessness, this device remains somewhat little known as regards the practical modalities of its use, which, moreover, appear not consensual.

CONCLUSION

A guide intended for the attention of the patients as well as a film relating to the practical modalities of the device' use were elaborated to improve the knowledge of both professionals and users in order to optimize and secure the care pathway.

Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common health problem. The lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for prolapse is 11%. POP significantly affects the effects on quality of life and activities of daily living. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) has been viewed as the gold standard treatment for women with POP who desire reconstructive surgery. However, LSC is associated with technical difficulties, resulting in a long learning curve and operative time. Recently, our team introduced a new laparoscopic technique of inguinal ligament suspension (LILS) and had confirmed its safety and efficacy in treating vaginal vault prolapse. As a new surgical technique for POP, a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the LILS with the standard technique of LSC is necessary. Therefore, we will conduct a trial.

Methods

The trial is a randomized controlled trial. It compares LILS with LSC in women with stage 2 or higher uterine prolapse. The primary outcomes of this study are perioperative parameters, including surgical time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, and hospital stay as well as surgical anatomical results using the pelvic organ prolapse questionnaire (POP-Q) classification at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and annually till 5 years after surgery. Secondary outcomes are subjective improvement in urogenital symptoms and quality of life, postoperative complications, postoperative recovery, sexual functioning, and cost-effectiveness at each follow-up point. Validated questionnaires will be used and the data will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Based on an objective success rate of 90%, a noninferiority margin of 15%, and a dropout of 20%, 107 patients are needed in each arm to prove the hypothesis with a 95% confidence interval.

Discussion

The trial is a randomized controlled, multicenter, noninferiority trial that will provide evidence whether the efficacy and safety of LILS is noninferior to LSC in women with symptomatic stage 2 or higher uterine prolapse.

Trial registration

China Trial Register (CTR): ChiCTR-INR-15007408. Registered on 9 November 2015.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2494-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension: an activity-based costing analysis

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common diagnosis that imposes high and ever-growing costs to the healthcare economy. Numerous surgical techniques for the treatment of POP exist, but there is no consensus about which is the ideal technique for treating apical prolapse. The aim of this study was to estimate hospital costs for the most frequently performed operation, vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension (VH) and the uterus-preserving Manchester-Fothergill procedure (MP), when including costs of postoperative activities.

METHODS

The study was based on a historical matched cohort including 590 patients (295 pairs) who underwent VH or MP during 2010-2014 owing to apical prolapse. The patients were matched according to age and preoperative prolapse stage and followed for a minimum of 20 months. Data were collected from four national registries and electronic medical records. Unit costs were obtained from relevant departments, hospital administration, calculated, or estimated by experts. The hospital perspective was applied for costing the resource use.

RESULTS

Total costs for the first 20 months after operation were 3,514 € per VH patient versus 2,318 € per MP patient. The cost difference between the techniques was 898 € (95% confidence interval [CI]: 818-982) per patient when analyzing the primary operation only and 1,196 € (CI: 927-1,465) when including subsequent activities within 20 months (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The MP is substantially less expensive than the commonly used VH from a 20-month time perspective. Healthcare costs can be reduced by one third if MP is preferred over VH in the treatment of apical prolapse.

Referral gynecological ambulatory clinic: principal diagnosis and distribution in health services

BACKGROUND

The association between gynecological diagnoses and their distribution in the health sectors provides benefits in the field of women's health promotion and in medical and interdisciplinary education, along with rationalization according to level of care complexity. Thus, the objective is analyze the clinical-demographic characteristics, main diagnoses in gynecological ambulatory care, and their distribution in health services.

METHOD

This is a research project of retrospective audit study design with a chart review of data from 428 women treated at University Ambulatory Clinic of Women's Health, the facility in gynecology and training for Family and Community Medical Residents, São Paulo, Brazil, from 2012 to 2014. Clinical and demographic information, gynecological diagnoses (International Classification of Diseases), and distribution of health services (primary, secondary, and tertiary) were described.

RESULTS

The female patients present non-inflammatory disorders of the female genital tract (81.07%, n = 347) and diseases of the urinary system (22.66%, n = 97) among the gynecological diagnoses. The chances of having benign breast disease and non-inflammatory disorders of the female genital tract during the reproductive period corresponds to being 3.61 (CI 1.00-16.29) and 2.56 times (CI 1.58-4.16) higher, respectively, than during the non-reproductive period. The non-inflammatory disorders of the female genital tract (93.33%, n = 28) are most related to the tertiary sector. The distribution in health services was the following: 71.30% (n = 305) in the primary sector, 21.70% (n = 93) in the secondary sector and 7% (n = 30) in the tertiary sector.

CONCLUSION

The studied women presented non-inflammatory disorders of the female genital tract and diseases of the urinary system as determined by gynecological diagnoses. Low-assistance complexity followed in most cases.

The Disability Impact and Associated Cost per Disability in Women Who Underwent Surgical Revision of Transvaginal Mesh Kits for Prolapse Repair

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate disability impact in patients and cost to the families of patients who have had complications of transvaginal prolapse mesh kits and underwent surgical revision.

METHODS

Patients who developed complications of transvaginal mesh kits for prolapse and who had undergone vaginal prolapse mesh surgical revision/removal in 2009 to 2014 at a single institution were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. The group was invited to complete a phone survey pertaining to the initial vaginal mesh used for prolapse surgery utilizing Sheehan Disability Scale (scale 0-10) and Years of life Lived with Disability (YLDs) questionnaires. The data collected were used to estimate the disability and cost analysis. We used our data to estimate the economic and quality-of-life impact of vaginal mesh complications on patients in the United States RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (62/198 [31.2%]) were consented to participate and completed the questionnaires by phone. Extremely disabled patients were 18 (29%) of 62 of whole cases, and 5 (8%) of 62 reported that they had no disability after vaginal mesh surgery. The median for overall disability score after vaginal mesh procedure was 8 (which reflects marked disability on a scale of 0-10). The majority of patients missed a median of 12 months of their school or work because of their mesh complications. Thirty-seven (59.6%) of 62 did not improve after mesh removal. Twenty-one (33.9%) of 62 stated that their family income dropped because of productivity loss related to mesh complications. The mean time between vaginal mesh surgery and mesh removal procedure was 4.7 years. Sheehan Disability Scale scores are significantly correlated with YLDs outcomes. Patients' overall disability score showed a significant correlation with YLDs scores (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Vaginal mesh for prolapse reduction complications had a sustained disability impact that continued despite mesh removal. Likewise, the complications were associated with increased economic burden on the families of the effected individuals and a drop in the family income in more than one third of the families.

Comparative analysis of overall cost and rate of healthcare utilization among apical prolapse procedures

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The annual cost of prolapse surgeries is expected to grow at twice the rate of population growth. Understanding the economic impact of apical prolapse procedures, including sacrospinous fixation (SSF), abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC), and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC), is crucial. We aimed to compare overall cost of SSF versus ASC and LSC, as well as health resource utilization, up to 90-day follow-up.

METHODS

Truven Marketscan Commercial Claims and Encounter databases 2008-2012 were used to calculate index and 90-day follow-up costs for SSF, ASC, and LSC with/without hysterectomy. Rates of inpatient readmissions, outpatient visits, and emergency room (ER) visits were also calculated during the follow-up period. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.3.

RESULTS

There were 17,549 SSF, 6126 ASC, and 10,708 LSC procedures. Mean index cost was lower for SSF (US$10,993) than ASC ($12,763, p < 0.0001) and LSC ($13,647, p < 0.0001). Concurrent hysterectomy impacted costs. Follow-up costs were likewise lower for SSF ($13,916) than ASC ($15,716, p < 0.0001) and LSC ($16,838, p < 0.0001). Lower rates of readmission were reported in SSF (4.22%) than ASC (5.40%, p = 0.0001) and LSC (4.64%, p = 0.0411). The rate of at least one ER visit was also lower for SSF (10.9%) than for ASC (12.0%, p = 0.0170) and comparable with LSC (10.6%, p = 0.0302).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall mean costs are significantly lower for SSF than ASC/LSC, as are those for health resource utilization. Besides lower morbidity rates being associated with vaginal procedures, our results demonstrate another reason to consider the increased use of SSF over sacrocolpopexies in apical prolapse surgery.

Trends and Factors Influencing Inpatient Prolapse Surgical Costs and Length of Stay in the United States

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess trends and factors affecting inpatient hospital costs and length of stay (LOS) in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse in the United States.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study along with longitudinal trend analysis from the 2001 to 2011 National Inpatient Sample included subjects who underwent inpatient prolapse repairs. The primary outcomes were inpatient mean cost per admission and LOS. We compared unadjusted differences in primary outcomes for each patient and hospital characteristic using 2011 data with analysis of variance. Multivariable regression estimated proportional change in cost and LOS associated with each characteristic.

RESULTS

Unadjusted analysis revealed increased LOS with age of 80 years or older, African American race, uninsured status, lower income, and lower surgical volume hospitals (≤75%) as well as increased costs in the West and public hospitals. On multivariable analyses, African Americans had 1.09 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.13; P < 0.001) times longer LOS compared with Caucasians, and the uninsured had 1.15 (95% CI, 1.01-1.30; P = 0.032) times longer LOS compared with those privately insured. Comorbidities associated with 20% increase in LOS and costs were pulmonary circulation disorders, metastatic cancer, weight loss, coagulopathy, and electrolyte/fluid imbalance (P < 0.001). Congestive heart failure and blood loss/deficiency anemia lead to 20% longer LOS (P < 0.001). In 2001-2011, mean LOS declined from 2.42 days (95% CI, 2.37-2.47) to 1.79 days (95% CI, 1.71-1.87) (P < 0.001), whereas mean total cost increased from $6233 (95% CI, $5859-$6607) to $9035 (95% CI, $8632-$9438) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Inpatient surgical costs for prolapse increased despite decreasing LOS. Some patient and hospital characteristics are associated with increased inpatient costs and LOS.

Should we use a vaginal pack to reduce blood loss at the time of prolapse surgery?

OBJECTIVE

Vaginal packs are commonly inserted after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery to absorb excess blood loss and to reduce haematoma formation. Randomised trials have shown little benefit in terms of reduced haematoma formation. However, the amount of blood loss absorbed on the pack has not been studied. The use of packs has financial costs and is associated with catheterisation and may delay hospital discharge. If packs are not effective in reducing blood loss and haematoma formation there could be an argument that packs should not be used at all. This study was designed to identify how much blood is actually absorbed onto packs after POP surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Consecutive patients undergoing elective vaginal surgery for POP were prospectively recruited by the lead author. Demographics were recorded. Vaginal packs inserted after POP surgery in 63 women were weighed before insertion and at the time of removal the day after surgery. Pain score were noted and the difference in the weight of packs recorded. Any complications were reported by the patients at the 6 week routine post operative visit and cross referenced with the clinical records.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant increase in pack weight of 6.7g (p<0.01). Five percent of the patients had a bleed of more than 25g into the pack. Removal of the pack was associated with minor discomfort. Complications in the post operative period were low with 11% of patients seen in the first 6 weeks with bleeding or discharge.

CONCLUSION

The majority of women undergoing prolapse surgery have minimal bleeding onto a routinely introduced vaginal pack placed after POP surgery. Packs are probably not required for controlling post operative blood loss in the majority of patients.

Abdominal sacral colpopexy versus sacrospinous ligament fixation: a cost-effectiveness analysis

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

For the surgical correction of apical prolapse the abdominal approach is associated with better outcomes; however, it is more expensive than the transvaginal approach. This cost-effectiveness analysis compares abdominal sacral colpopexy (ASC) with sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) to determine if the improved outcomes of ASC justify the increased expense.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model was created comparing ASC with SSLF using data-modeling software, TreeAge Pro (2013), which included the following outcomes: post-operative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with possible mid-urethral sling (MUS) placement, prolapse recurrence with possible re-operation, and post-operative dyspareunia. Cost-effectiveness was defined as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of less than $50,000 per quality-associated life year (QALY). Base-case, threshold, and one-way sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

At the baseline, ASC is more expensive than SSLF ($13,988 vs $11,950), but is more effective (QALY 1.53 vs 1.45) and is cost-effective (ICER $24,574/QALY) at 2 years. ASC was not cost-effective if the following four thresholds were met: the rate of post-operative SUI was above 36 % after ASC or below 28 % after SSLF; the rate of MUS placement for post-operative SUI was above 60 % after ASC or below 13 % after SSLF; the rate of recurrent prolapse was above 15 % after ASC or below 4 % after SSLF; the rate of post-operative dyspareunia was above 59 % after ASC or below 19 % after SSLF.

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominal sacral colpopexy can be cost-effective compared with sacrospinous ligament fixation; however, as the post-operative outcomes of SSLF improve, SSLF can be considered a cost-effective alternative.

Functional outcome after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with or without concomitant hysterectomy

PURPOSE

When counseling patients about surgical alternatives for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair, numerous things have to be considered. Uterine preservation vs. hysterectomy is one relevant issue. Hysterectomy has been traditionally performed for POP, but its benefit regarding outcome has never been proven. Furthermore, a growing number of women ask for uterine preservation.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 384 patients who had undergone surgery for POP between 2000 and 2012 at Freiburg University Medical Center were included. Using a standardized questionnaire, further surgeries, urinary incontinence, recurrent POP, pessary use, and satisfaction with the surgical outcome were evaluated. The functional results after uterine preservation vs. concomitant hysterectomy were compared using t test.

RESULTS

196 (51.04%) women were available for follow-up and agreed to participate (n = 122 with hysterectomy, n = 72 with uterine-preserving surgery, respectively). After a mean follow-up time of 67 months, vaginal bulge symptoms and urinary incontinence did not differ between treatment groups. We observed higher success rates and satisfaction scores in the uterine-preserving group. Regarding satisfaction with surgery and whether the patients thought it had been successful, we observed a trend toward better results in the uterine-preserving group (mean satisfaction score: 8.45 ± 2.15 vs. 7.76 ± 2.91, range 0-10, p = 0.061; success: 91.4 vs. 81.7 %, p = 0.087).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference with regard to functional outcome between patients with or without concomitant hysterectomy. Satisfaction with the operation was slightly higher after uterus preserving surgery. Therefore, uterine-preserving surgery is a valuable option unless there are contraindications.