Rapid access imaging for occult fractured neck of femur

Cost-Effective Analysis of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Occult Hip Fractures Among Older Adults

OBJECTIVE

Early and accurate diagnosis of hip fractures minimizes morbidity and mortality. Although current guidelines favor magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of occult hip fractures, a new technology called dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) seems an effective alternative. This article investigates a potentially cost-effective strategy for the diagnosis of occult hip fractures in older adults in Singapore.

METHODS

A decision tree model was developed to compare costs from a payer's perspective and outcomes in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of different imaging strategies for diagnosing occult hip fracture, comparing MRI with DECT supplementing single-energy computed tomography (SECT) and SECT alone. Model inputs were obtained from local sources where available. Sensitivity analyses are performed to test the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

The MRI strategy was dominated by the DECT strategy, whereas DECT supplementing SECT provided 0.30 more QALYs at an incremental cost of SGD106.41 with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of SGD352.52 per QALY relative to SECT alone. DECT seemed a cost-effective strategy at a willingness-to-pay threshold of SGD50 000 per QALY.

CONCLUSION

DECT supplementing SECT is a cost-effective imaging strategy to diagnose occult hip fractures among older adults in Singapore and should be included in clinical pathways to expedite timely treatment and considered for reimbursement schemes.

Use of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for occult neck of femur fractures: A single-centre study

OBJECTIVE

Neck of femur (NOF) fractures are common and serious injuries in the elderly. When a NOF fracture is suspected but is not clearly visible on radiographs, guidelines recommend magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or computed tomography (CT) if MRI is not available/contraindicated. The aim of our study was to review the use of CT and subsequent MRI for suspected NOF fractures in patients with negative or equivocal radiographs.

METHODS

A retrospective review of adult patients with negative or equivocal plain radiographs with suspected NOF fractures presenting between 1 July 2015 and 30 June 2017 was performed. Review of CT and subsequent MRI studies was performed with documentation of reported findings, time intervals from plain radiographs to CT and MRI and final outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 184 CT studies in 181 patients were reviewed; median age was 82 years (interquartile range 71-89 years) with 110 (60.8%) female patients. CT reported 20 occult fractures; all proceeded to surgery. MRI was performed in 23 patients and revealed additional four NOF fractures missed by CT. An additional fifth fracture missed by CT was confirmed by follow-up radiographs. Median time was approximately 4 h from radiographs to CT and approximately 56 h from radiographs to MRI.

CONCLUSION

Access to CT for evaluation of suspected occult NOF fractures is much quicker compared to MRI. When CT results are negative with on-going clinical suspicion of an occult fracture, MRI should be performed in a time efficient manner.