Alendronate sodium/vitamin D3 combination tablet versus calcitriol for osteoporosis in Chinese postmenopausal women: a 6-month, randomized, open-label, active-comparator-controlled study with a 6-month extension

Clinical outcomes and safety of combined calcitriol and bisphosphonates in treating postmenopausal osteoporosis: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Despite the well-known benefits of calcitriol and bisphosphonates in managing osteoporosis, limited research has explored the combined therapeutic effects of these agents on bone metabolism, immune function, and clinical outcomes in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of calcitriol combined with bisphosphonates in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis through a retrospective cohort analysis.

METHODS

A total of 152 postmenopausal osteoporosis patients treated at our hospital from March 2019 to June 2021 were enrolled and divided into two groups based on the treatment received. The control group received calcitriol alone, while the study group received calcitriol combined with bisphosphonates. Treatment outcomes were assessed by comparing Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for pain, Barthel Index for daily living ability, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for dysfunction before and after treatment. Bone metabolism markers (BALP, BGP, PINP, TRACP), immune cytokines (IL-6, TGF-β1, TNF-α, IL-10), and bone mineral density (BMD) were measured. The incidence of adverse reactions was also recorded.

RESULTS

The total effective rate in the study group was 96.05%, significantly higher than 84.21% in the control group (P < 0.05). Post-treatment VAS and ODI scores decreased significantly in both groups, with greater improvement in the study group (P < 0.05). Barthel Index scores increased more in the study group (P < 0.05). Bone metabolism markers (BALP, BGP, PINP, TRACP) and inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TGF-β1, TNF-α) decreased more significantly in the study group, while IL-10 levels and BMD increased more markedly (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was lower in the study group (2.63%) than in the control group (5.26%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combination of calcitriol and bisphosphonates demonstrates superior clinical efficacy and safety in treating postmenopausal osteoporosis, effectively reducing pain and disability, enhancing bone metabolism and immune function, and improving bone mineral density and daily living ability.

Employing Diaryl Pyrrolone Fluorescence With Ninhydrin and Phenylacetaldehyde for Sensitive Determination of Alendronate Sodium in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Tablets: Evaluation of Method Greenness

Alendronate sodium (ALN) is used to treat osteoporosis in men and women who experienced menopause. A new, sensitive, environmentally friendly, selective, and reasonably priced spectrofluorimetric technique was devised for ALN determination utilizing the reaction of the drug with ninhydrin and phenylacetaldehyde in the presence of Teorell-Stenhagen buffer (pH 7). The interaction yielded a highly luminescent diaryl pyrrolone product with strong emission at 464 nm following excitation at 390 nm. Optimization of various method parameters was performed, and a calibration curve was constructed. Linear regression statistical analysis shows a highly strong correlation (r = 0.9995). The method could determine ALN in the linear concentration range of 0.5-4.0 μg mL-1. Adopting ICH guidelines criteria, method validation was done, and the results confirmed the acceptable accuracy and precision. The LOD and LOQ values were computed as 0.13 and 0.41 μg mL-1, respectively. Application of the method for the analysis of oral tablets containing ALN alone or combined with vitamin D3 was successfully performed with no interferences from vitamin D3 or other coformulated excipients, proving excellent selectivity. Moreover, the method was evaluated for environmental greenness via three different tools confirming its acceptable greenness. Hence, the method can be successfully utilized in quality control laboratories.

Alendronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women

RATIONALE

Osteoporosis is an abnormal reduction in bone mass and bone deterioration, leading to increased fracture risk. Alendronate belongs to the bisphosphonate class of drugs, which inhibit bone resorption by interfering with the activity of osteoclasts (bone cells that break down bone tissue). This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2008.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of alendronate in the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women at lower and higher risk of fracture, respectively.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews (which includes CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, two trial registers, drug approval agency websites, and the bibliographies of relevant systematic reviews to identify the studies included in this review. The latest search date was 01 February 2023. We imposed no restrictions on language, date, form of publication, or reported outcomes.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included only randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of alendronate on postmenopausal women. Targeted participants must have received at least one year of alendronate. We classified a study as secondary prevention if its population met one or more of the following hierarchical criteria: a diagnosis of osteoporosis, a history of vertebral fractures, a low bone mineral density T-score (-2.5 or lower), and 75 years old or older. If a study population met none of those criteria, we classified it as a primary prevention study.

OUTCOMES

Our major outcomes were clinical vertebral, non-vertebral, hip, and wrist fractures, withdrawals due to adverse events, and serious adverse events.

RISK OF BIAS

We used the Cochrane risk of bias 1 tool.

SYNTHESIS METHODS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Based on the previous review experience, in which the clinical and methodological characteristics in the primary and secondary prevention studies were homogeneous, we used a fixed-effect model for meta-analysis and estimated effects using the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes. Our base case analyses included all eligible placebo-controlled studies with usable data. We selected the data available for the longest treatment period. We consider a relative change exceeding 15% as clinically important.

INCLUDED STUDIES

We included 119 studies, of which 102 studies provided data for quantitative synthesis. Of these, we classified 34 studies (15,188 participants) as primary prevention and 68 studies (29,577 participants) as secondary prevention. We had concerns about risks of bias in most studies. Selection bias was the most frequently overlooked domain, with only 20 studies (19%) describing appropriate methods for both sequence generation and allocation concealment. Eight studies (8%) were at low risk of bias in all seven domains.

SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

The base case analyses included 16 primary prevention studies (one to five years in length; 10,057 women) and 20 secondary prevention studies (one to three years in length; 7375 women) which compared alendronate 10 mg/day (or 70 mg/week) to placebo, no treatment, or both. Indirectness, imprecision, and risk of bias emerged as the main factors contributing to the downgrading of the certainty of the evidence. For primary prevention, alendronate may lead to a clinically important reduction in clinical vertebral fractures (16/1190 in the alendronate group versus 24/926 in the placebo group; RR 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25 to 0.84; absolute risk reduction [ARR] 1.4% fewer, 95% CI 1.9% fewer to 0.4% fewer; low-certainty evidence) and non-vertebral fractures (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.97; ARR 1.6% fewer, 95% CI 2.6% fewer to 0.3% fewer; low-certainty evidence). However, clinically important differences were not observed for the following outcomes: hip fractures (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.32; ARR 0.2% fewer, 95% CI 0.4% fewer to 0.2% more; low-certainty evidence); wrist fractures (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.49; ARR 0.3% more, 95% CI 0.4% fewer to 1.1% more; low-certainty evidence); withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.18; ARR 0.2% more, 95% CI 0.9% fewer to 1.5% more; low-certainty evidence); and serious adverse events (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.43; ARR 0.5% more, 95% CI 1.2% fewer to 2.8% more; low-certainty evidence). For secondary prevention, alendronate probably results in a clinically important reduction in clinical vertebral fractures (24/1114 in the alendronate group versus 51/1055 in the placebo group; RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.73; ARR 2.7% fewer, 95% CI 3.5% fewer to 1.3% fewer; moderate-certainty evidence). It may lead to a clinically important reduction in non-vertebral fractures (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.99; ARR 2.8% fewer, 95% CI 5.1% fewer to 0.1% fewer; low-certainty evidence); hip fractures (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.96; ARR 1.0% fewer, 95% CI 1.5% fewer to 0.1% fewer; low-certainty evidence); wrist fractures (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.90; ARR 1.8% fewer, 95% CI 2.6% fewer to 0.4% fewer; low-certainty evidence); and serious adverse events (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.96; ARR 3.5% fewer, 95% CI 5.8% fewer to 0.6% fewer; low-certainty evidence). However, the effects of alendronate for withdrawals due to adverse events are uncertain (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.16; ARR 0.4% fewer, 95% CI 1.7% fewer to 1.3% more; very low-certainty evidence). Furthermore, the updated evidence for the safety risks of alendronate suggests that, irrespective of participants' risk of fracture, alendronate may lead to little or no difference for gastrointestinal adverse events. Zero incidents of osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femoral fracture were observed.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For primary prevention, compared to placebo, alendronate 10 mg/day may reduce clinical vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, but it might make little or no difference to hip and wrist fractures, withdrawals due to adverse events, and serious adverse events. For secondary prevention, alendronate probably reduces clinical vertebral fractures, and may reduce non-vertebral, hip, and wrist fractures, and serious adverse events, compared to placebo. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of alendronate on withdrawals due to adverse events.

FUNDING

This Cochrane review had no dedicated funding.

REGISTRATION

This review is an update of the previous review (DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001155).

Efficacy of combination therapy of vitamin D and bisphosphonates in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

There is currently no consensus on whether the combination therapy of Vitamin D (VitD) and bisphosphonates offers superior efficacy compared to monotherapy in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The aim of this study is to conduct a meta-analysis of recent relevant research to synthesize the available evidence and further investigate whether the combined use of VitD and bisphosphonates is superior to monotherapy in treating osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Methods and results

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of monotherapy with VitD or bisphosphonates versus their combination therapy in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, up to 1 February 2024. The articles were independently screened and relevant data were extracted by two investigators. The changes in mean values and percentage changes for bone resorption markers, bone formation markers, bone mineral density, and bone mineral metabolism markers were expressed using the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was quantitatively described using the I2 test. Subsequently, sensitivity analyses were performed for data with significant heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the type of monotherapy used, and potential publication bias was assessed. The analysis revealed that the combination of VitD and bisphosphonates demonstrated a more pronounced effect in increasing alkaline phosphatase (ALP), 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-VD), and serum calcium (sCa) levels, as well as in decreasing levels of serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (sBALP), serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (sCTX), and urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen (UriNTX) compared to the monotherapy group. However, the combination of VitD and bisphosphonates did not show a significant advantage over monotherapy in terms of improving osteocalcin levels. The differences in the mean changes in osteocalcin, UriNTX, and sCa, as well as the percentage changes in parathyroid hormone (PTH) were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

The meta-analysis suggests that compared to monotherapy, the combination therapy of VitD and bisphosphonates exhibits a more favorable effect on bone mineral density and bone calcium metabolism-related markers in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/PROSPERO.

Analysis of medication treatment for women with osteoporosis: A real-world retrospective study from Chinese tertiary grade A hospital

Purpose

This study aimed to analyze the current medication treatment status for women with osteoporosis (OP) based on real-world prescription data from 2016 to 2021 in Chinese nine cities' tertiary Grade A hospital and systematically describe the medication treatment patterns in women with OP.

Methods

Prescription information for female OP patients in nine cities (Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Hangzhou, Tianjin, Zhengzhou, Chengdu, Shenyang, Harbin) was extracted from the Hospital Prescription Analysis Collaboration Project Database of the Hospital Pharmacy Professional Committee of the Chinese Pharmaceutical Association. Statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate demographic characteristics and medication treatment patterns.

Results

A total of 669,505 prescriptions for medication treatment of female OP patients were included in this study. The majority of patients were aged 60 to 99 years (69.79 %) followed by 50 to 59 years (18.81 %) and 40 to 49 years (6.69 %). Geographically, the highest concentration of patients was in North China (Beijing, Tianjin) (43.05 %) followed by East China (Shanghai, Hangzhou) (31.43 %). The top three prescribed medications were active vitamin D and its analogs (40.78 %), calcium supplements (32.51 %), and bisphosphonates (18.75 %). The prescription frequency of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) was 0.31 %. The proportion of female OP patients receiving monotherapy and two drug combinations therapy is equivalent (about 37 %).

Conclusion

The diagnosis and treatment of female OP patients in China showed regional variations. The most commonly prescribed medications for this population were calcitriol, calcium carbonate with vitamin D3, and alendronate sodium with vitamin D3. The use of MHT was relatively limited.

Effect of calcium plus Vitamin-D combined with calcitriol in the treatment of patients with Type-2 diabetes and osteoporosis: A retrospective observational analysis

Objective

To explore the clinical effect of calcium plus Vitamin-D combined with calcitriol in the treatment of patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients and osteoporosis.

Methods

In this retrospective observational study clinical records of 90 patients with T2DM combined with osteoporosis, treated in The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from October 2019 to April 2022 were incuded. All patients received basic hypoglycemic treatment. Of 90 patients, 43 received calcium plus Vitamin-D adjuvant therapy (Control-group), and 47 patients received calcium plus Vitamin-D combined with calcitriol adjuvant therapy (Observation-group). Clinical efficacy, adverse reactions, bone metabolism levels, and changes in bone density levels were compared between the two groups.

Results

The clinical efficacy of the treatment was significantly higher in the Observation-group (93.6%) compared to the Control-group (83.7%; p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (p>0.05). After treatment, bone metabolism and bone density indicators in both groups improved, and were significantly better in the Observation-group compared to the Control-group (p<0.05).

Conclusions

Combination of calcium plus Vitamin-D and calcitriol adjuvant therapy in patients with T2DM and osteoporosis is safe and associated with better treatment efficacy, improved bone metabolism and bone density parameters than calcium plus Vitamin-D treatment alone.

Efficacy of Danshen injection combined with Calcitriol and Calcium/Vitamin-D for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures: A retrospective case-control study

Objective

To explore the efficacy of Danshen injection combined with calcitriol and calcium/Vitamin-D in the treatment of osteoporotic fractures.

Methods

This was a case-control study. We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 91 patients with osteoporotic fractures who received treatment in Rui'an People's Hospital from February 2021 to July 2022. The data were divided into a control group with 44 records of patients who received treatment with calcitriol and calcium/Vitamin-D, and a study group with 47 patients who received Danshen injection combined with calcitriol and calcium/Vitamin-D. The control group individuals were coordinated with the patients in terms of their age and gender. Treatment effects, inflammatory response levels, and bone metabolic status levels were comparable between the two groups before and after the treatment.

Results

The total efficacy of the treatment in the study group was better than that in the control group (P<0.05). After the treatment, levels of serum inflammatory factors in both groups decreased compared to those before the treatment, and the study group displayed lower levels than the control group (P<0.05). After the treatment, the bone metabolism status of both groups improved, and the improvement effect of the study group was better (P<0.05). The incidences of adverse reactions were similar in both groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Danshen injection combined with calcitriol and calcium/Vitamin-D for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures can effectively reduce inflammation, regulate bone metabolism, and improve fracture treatment efficacy with a favorable safety profile.

Efficacy of the systemic co-administration of vitamin D3 in reversing the inhibitory effects of sodium alendronate on orthodontic tooth movement: A preliminary experimental animal study

INTRODUCTION

Bisphosphonates can severely slow down orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) by reducing bone turnover. This calls for materials and methods to reverse or neutralize their effects on OTM. We propose systemic vitamin D3 (D3) for this purpose.

METHODS

Thirty-two male Wistar rats were randomized into 4 groups of 8 each. Three groups were administered D3 (3 systemic doses of 24,000 IU/kg each), alendronate (ALN) (5 doses of 7 mg/kg each), and ALN+D3 (same doses as mentioned above). One group served as the negative control. The incisors were distalized at 30 g of force for 2 weeks. OTMs were measured blindly. Radicular pressure areas were searched histologically (blindly) for capillaries, Howship's lacunae, osteoclasts, and osteoblasts. Data were analyzed statistically (α = 0.05, α = 0.0083, β <0.1).

RESULTS

OTMs in the groups D3, ALN+D3, ALN, and control were 1.900 ± 0.237, 1.629 ± 0.219, 0.975 ± 0.145, and 1.565 ± 0.324 mm (analysis of variance, P <0.001), respectively. OTM in the ALN group was smaller than all other groups (Tukey, P <0.001). OTM in the D3 group was greater than in the control group (P = 0.054). The ALN+D3 group had greater OTM than the ALN group (P <0.001) but was not significantly different from the D3 (P = 0.153) or control (P = 0.951) groups. All histologic variables were significantly different across groups (Kruskal-Wallis, P <0.001). All the markers in the D3 group were more frequent than those of the other groups (Mann-Whitney U, P <0.001). There were fewer markers in the ALN group than in the control group (P ≤0.001). The ALN+D3 group had more markers than the ALN group in terms of capillaries, osteoclasts, and osteoblasts (P ≤0.007). The ALN+D3 group was similar to the control group regarding capillaries, osteoclasts, and osteoblasts (P ≥0.382).

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic vitamin D3 may accelerate OTM and increase histologic biomarkers of bone turnover. ALN reduces OTM and its histologic biomarkers. Systemic vitamin D3 can reverse this inhibitory effect of ALN on OTM back to normal.

Assessing the Effectiveness of Bisphosphonates for the Prevention of Fragility Fractures: An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analyses

Bisphosphonates have been found to be effective in preventing fragility fractures. However, their comparative effectiveness in populations at risk has yet to be defined. In light of recent clinical trials, we aimed to compare four bisphosphonates (alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, and zoledronate) and to identify which are the most effective for the prevention of fragility fractures. This is an update of a systematic review previously published as part of a NICE HTA report. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis, updating the estimates regarding the comparative effectiveness of the aforementioned bisphosphonates. Studies identified from published and unpublished sources between 2014 and 2021 were added to the studies identified in the previous review. Screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently undertaken by two reviewers. Outcomes were fractures, femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD), mortality, and adverse events. We identified 25 additional trials, resulting in a total population of 47,007 participants. All treatments had beneficial effects on fractures versus placebo with zoledronate being the most effective treatment in preventing vertebral fractures (hazard ratio [HR] 0.38; 95% credibility interval [CrI], 0.28-0.49). Zoledronate (HR 0.71; 95% CrI, 0.61-0.81) and risedronate (HR 0.70; 95% CrI, 0.53-0.84) were found to be the most effective treatments in preventing nonvertebral fractures. All treatments were associated with increases in femoral neck BMD versus placebo with zoledronate being the most effective treatment mean difference (MD 4.02; 95% CrI, 3.2-4.84). There was a paucity of data regarding hip and wrist fractures. Depending on its cost-effectiveness, zoledronate could be considered a first-line option for people at increased risk of fragility fractures. © 2022 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Identification of Potential Therapeutic Targets and Molecular Regulatory Mechanisms for Osteoporosis by Bioinformatics Methods

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass, deterioration of bone tissue structure, and susceptibility to fracture. New and more suitable therapeutic targets need to be discovered.

METHODS

We collected osteoporosis-related datasets (GSE56815, GSE99624, and GSE63446). The methylation markers were obtained by differential analysis. Degree, DMNC, MCC, and MNC plug-ins were used to screen the important methylation markers in PPI network, then enrichment analysis was performed. ROC curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic effect of osteoporosis. In addition, we evaluated the difference in immune cell infiltration between osteoporotic patients and control by ssGSEA. Finally, differential miRNAs in osteoporosis were used to predict the regulators of key methylation markers.

RESULTS

A total of 2351 differentially expressed genes and 5246 differentially methylated positions were obtained between osteoporotic patients and controls. We identified 19 methylation markers by PPI network. They were mainly involved in biological functions and signaling pathways such as apoptosis and immune inflammation. HIST1H3G, MAP3K5, NOP2, OXA1L, and ZFPM2 with higher AUC values were considered key methylation markers. There were significant differences in immune cell infiltration between osteoporotic patients and controls, especially dendritic cells and natural killer cells. The correlation between MAP3K5 and immune cells was high, and its differential expression was also validated by other two datasets. In addition, NOP2 was predicted to be regulated by differentially expressed hsa-miR-3130-5p.

CONCLUSION

Our efforts aim to provide new methylation markers as therapeutic targets for osteoporosis to better treat osteoporosis in the future.

Construction of multilayered molecular reservoirs on a titanium alloy implant for combinational drug delivery to promote osseointegration in osteoporotic conditions

In this study, β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) molecules are used as molecular reservoirs and grafted onto chitosan molecules for calcitriol (VD3) loading, which is a hormonally active metabolite of vitamin D. The resultant molecular complex is co-assembled with an antiosteoporosis drug calcitonin (CT) to form bio-functional multilayer structure on Ti6Al7Nb substrate via layer-by-layer self-assembly, which is capable of releasing VD3 and calcitonin in a sustained manner to modulate osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and macrophages at the bone-implant interface. In vitro results show that the released VD3 and CT individually upregulated the expression of calcium-binding protein (including Calbindin D9k and Calbindin D28k) and BMP2 in osteoblasts in peri-implant regions to stimulate their Ca deposition and differentiation. RAW264.7 cells (a murine macrophage) on the biofunctional implant displayed improved M2 phenotypical differentiation and expression of BMP2 and VEGF genes, but M1 phenotypical differentiation potential and MCF and TRAP gene expression levels are evidently lower. Results from in vivo micro-CT and histological analysis also demonstrate that VD3/CT co-loaded implant can dramatically enhance the bone remodeling under osteoporotic conditions with significantly enhanced interfacial shear strength and improved osseointegration as compared to other groups. The insights in this study offer new avenues for the rational functionalization of titanium implants to effectively repair osteoporotic fractures. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: A promising strategy to enhance the recovery rate of osteoporotic fractures is to immobilize antiosteoporotic drugs onto the surface of titanium-based implants. In this study, we grafted beta-cyclodextrin (β-CD) onto chitosan (Chi) molecules to load VD3, which was co-assembled with calcitonin (CT) onto Ti6Al7Nb implants by the layer-by-layer assembly technique. The obtained functional titanium alloy implant (Ti6Al7Nb/LBL/Chi-CD@VD3/ CT) could stably release VD3 and calcitonin agents in a sustained manner. RAW264.7 cells grown on Ti6Al7Nb/LBL/Chi-CD@VD3/CT showed superior M2 phenotypical differentiation efficiency, but lower MCF/TRAP gene expression levels. In vitro and in vivo results showed that the released VD3 and CT individually upregulated the expression of calcium binding proteins and BMP2 in osteoblasts, promoting new bone formation in the peri-implant region.

East meets West: current practices and policies in the management of musculoskeletal aging

Healthy aging is defined as the process of developing and maintaining the functional ability that enables wellbeing in older age. Healthy aging is dependent upon intrinsic capacity, a composite of physical and mental capacities, and the environment an individual inhabits and their interactions with it. Maintenance of musculoskeletal health during aging is a key determinant of functional ability. Sarcopenia, osteoporosis and osteoarthritis, are a triad of musculoskeletal diseases of aging that are major contributors to the global burden of disease and disability worldwide. The prevention and management of these disorders is of increasing importance with pressure mounting from the aging population. In a new initiative, the Chinese Medical Association, Chinese Society of Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Research, and the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases jointly organized a symposium to discuss current practices and policies in the management of musculoskeletal aging. The meeting allowed experts from Europe and China to share their experience and recommendations for the management of these three major diseases. Discussing and analyzing similarities and differences in their practice should lead, through a mutual enrichment of knowledge, to better management of these diseases, in order to preserve intrinsic capacity and retard the age-related degradation of physical ability. In future, it is hoped that sharing of knowledge and best practice will advance global strategies to reduce the burden of musculoskeletal disease and promote healthy aging tailored to meet the individual patient’s needs.

Role of nutritional vitamin D in osteoporosis treatment

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disorder characterized by a decrease in bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue. The World Health Organization has defined osteoporosis as a decrease in bone mass (50%) and bony quality (50%). Vitamin D, a steroid hormone, is crucial for skeletal health and in mineral metabolism. Its direct action on osteoblasts and osteoclasts and interaction with nonskeletal tissues help in maintaining a balance between bone turnover and bone growth. Vitamin D affects the activity of osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes, suggesting that it affects bone formation, bone resorption, and bone quality. At physiological concentrations, active vitamin D maintains a normal rate of bone resorption and formation through the RANKL/OPG signal. However, active vitamin D at pharmacological concentration inhibits bone resorption at a higher rate than that of bone formation, which influences the bone quality and quantity. Nutritional vitamin D rather than active vitamin D activates osteoblasts and maintains serum 25(OH)D3 concentration. Despite many unanswered questions, much data support nutritional vitamin D use in osteoporosis patients. This article emphasizes the role of nutritional vitamin D replacement in different turnover status (high or low bone turnover disorders) of osteoporosis together with either anti-resorptive (Bisphosphonate, Denosumab et.) or anabolic (Teriparatide) agents when osteoporosis persists.

Clinical characteristics associated with bone mineral density improvement after 1-year alendronate/vitamin d3 or calcitriol treatment: Exploratory results from a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial on postmenopausal osteoporotic women in China

Baseline and on-treatment characteristics, including age, obesity, calcium intake, and bone turnover markers, may predict the bone mineral density (BMD) response in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) to 1 to 2 years of antiresorptive therapy and/or vitamin D supplementation. This study aimed to explore clinical characteristics associated with 12-month BMD improvement in Chinese women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO).In this post hoc analysis of a previous phase 3 multicenter, randomized controlled trial, Chinese PMO women who were treated with once weekly alendronate 70 mg/vitamin D3 5600 IU (ALN/D5600) or once daily calcitriol 0.25 mcg, and had measurements of 1-year lumbar spine BMD (LS-BMD) and on-treatment bone turnover markers (BTMs) were included in the analysis.In Chinese PMO patients on ALN/D5600, 1-year LS-BMD change was negatively correlated with age (β = -0.00084, P < .01), dietary calcium (β = -0.0017, P = .07), and procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) change at month 6 (β = -0.000469, P = .0016), but positively with body mass index (BMI) (β = 0.00128, P = .08); baseline P1NP above the median was associated with a significantly greater BMD percentage change at the lumbar spine (P = .02) and the total hip (P = .0001). In the calcitriol group, a significant 1-year LS-BMD increase was associated with BMI (β = 0.0023, P = .02), baseline P1NP (β = 0.00035, P = .0067), history of prior vertebral fracture(s) (β = 0.034, P < .0001) and baseline serum 25(OH)D level (β = -0.00083, P = .02).The presented findings from Chinese postmenopausal osteoporotic women suggested clinically meaningful baseline and on-treatment characteristics predicting BMD improvement after 1 year of ALN/D5600 treatment, which differed from calcitriol treatment with baseline identifiable associations. The study remained exploratory and further accumulation of evidence is needed.

Calcifediol (25-hydroxyvitamin D) improvement and calcium-phosphate metabolism of alendronate sodium/vitamin D3 combination in Chinese women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a post hoc efficacy analysis and safety reappraisal

BACKGROUND

Vitamin D (VD) insufficiency or deficiency is a frequent comorbidity in Chinese women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO). The present study aimed to investigate 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH) D] improvement and calcium-phosphate metabolism in Chinese PMO patients treated with 70 mg of alendronate sodium and 5600 IU of vitamin D₃ (ALN/D5600).

METHODS

Chinese PMO women (n = 219) were treated with 12-month ALN/D5600 (n = 111) or calcitriol (n = 108). Changes in 25(OH) D at month 12 were post hoc analyzed by the baseline 25 (OH) D status using the longitudinal analysis. The main safety outcome measures included serum calcium and phosphate and 24-h urine calcium, and the repeated measures mixed model was used to assess the frequencies of the calcium-phosphate metabolic disorders.

RESULTS

Absolute change in mean serum 25(OH) D level was the greatest in VD-deficient patients and least in VD-sufficient patients at months six and 12 (both, P < 0.01). Serum calcium level remained significantly lower in the ALN/D5600 treatment group than in the calcitriol treatment group throughout the 12 months. Mean 24-h urine calcium slightly increased in the ALN/D5600 treatment group and significantly increased in the calcitriol treatment group (+ 1.1 and + 0.9 mmol/L at months six and 12; both, P < 0.05). Calcitriol treatment was associated with more frequent hypercalciuria at month six (9.4% vs. 18.5%, P = 0.05), but not at month 12 (12.3% vs. 13.0%).

CONCLUSION

Baseline VD status predicted 25(OH) D improvement in PMO patients on 12-month ALN/D5600 treatment. The daily use of 0.25 μg of calcitriol was associated with more frequent hypercalciuria at month six, compared to ALN/5600 treatment, necessitating the safety re-evaluation of calcitriol at a higher dosage.

Cholecalciferol Supplementation Promotes Bone Turnover in Chinese Adults with Vitamin D Deficiency

BACKGROUND

Bone turnover markers (BTMs) are proposed as alternative indicators for bone mineral density in diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. However, little is known about the effects of vitamin D supplementation on BTMs in nonwhite populations.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the responses in BTMs after vitamin D supplementation in Asians.

METHODS

In this secondary data analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 448 Chinese adults [mean ± SD age: 31.9 ± 8.0 y; mean ± SD body mass index (kg/m2): 22.1 ± 2.6; 69% were women] with vitamin D deficiency (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] <50 nmol/L) received 2000 IU/d cholecalciferol or placebo for 20 wk. Serum concentrations of 25(OH)D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium, and markers of bone formation and resorption were measured at weeks 0 and 20. Intention-to-treat analysis was applied, and between-group differences were compared by general linear models with adjustments.

RESULTS

Cholecalciferol supplementation increased the serum bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP) concentration (+1.7 ± 1.9 µg/L) significantly more than placebo (+1.1 ± 1.7 µg/L; P = 0.004), but not circulating concentrations of procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), β-isomerized C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (β-CTX), or tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAP5b) (P ≥ 0.53). Notably, a pooled analysis indicated that changes in serum 25(OH)D were positively associated with changes in serum BALP, PINP, and TRAP5b (r = 0.07-0.16, P ≤ 0.02), but inversely with changes in PTH (r = -0.15, P < 0.001). Among cholecalciferol-treated participants, individuals who achieved serum 25(OH)D ≥75 nmol/L had greater increases in serum β-CTX (224% compared with 146%; P = 0.02) and TRAP5b (22.2% compared with 9.1%; P = 0.007), but smaller decreases in serum calcium (-1.3% compared with -1.9%; P = 0.005) and calcium-phosphorus product (-2.6% compared with -3.3%; P = 0.02) compared with those with serum 25(OH)D <75 nmol/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Daily supplementation with 2000 IU cholecalciferol for 20 wk may promote bone formation in Chinese adults with vitamin D deficiency. More studies are needed to elucidate the potential clinical implications of BTMs.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01998763.

Effects of alendronate and alfacalcidol on bone in patients with myasthenia gravis initiating glucocorticoids treatment

OBJECTIVE

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are the first-line treatment for myasthenia gravis (MG) and act as long-term immunosuppressants. However, GCs can induce osteoporosis and bone fractures. In this study, we evaluate the effects of oral alendronate and alfacalcidol, or alfacalcidol alone on the bone of Chinese patients with MG who will initiate treatment with GCs.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 75 patients were included in this 12-month prospective, open-label, single-centre study. Patients with bone mineral density (BMD) T-score less than -1.0 at baseline were treated with 70 mg of alendronate per week. Patients with BMD T-score greater than -1.0 at baseline were included in the alfacalcidol-alone group. Patients in two groups were treated with 0.25 μg of alfacalcidol every other day and 600 mg of calcium daily.

RESULTS

After 12 months of treatment, the mean BMD of lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip increased by 3.4% (P = .002), 1.8% (P = .21) and 2.6% (P = .02), respectively, in alendronate group. In alfacalcidol-alone group, the mean BMD of lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip decreased by 6.1%, 3.2% and 3.3%, respectively (all P < .001 vs baseline).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated for the first time that treatment with alendronate combined with alfacalcidol significantly increased BMD, decreased bone turnover biomarker levels and reduced the occurrence of hypercalciuria in a large cohort of Chinese patients with MG who initiated treatment with glucocorticoids. However, treatment with alfacalcidol alone failed to prevent bone loss in patients with MG receiving glucocorticoid therapy.

Moxibustion treatment for primary osteoporosis: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Primary osteoporosis (POP) has a serious impact on quality of life for middle-aged and elderly, which particularly increase the risk of fracture. We conducted the systematic review to evaluate the effects of moxibustion for POP in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).Eight databases were searched from their inception to July 30, 2016. The RCTs reporting the moxibustion as a monotherapy or in combination with conventional therapy for POP were enrolled. The outcomes might be fracture incidence, quality of life, clinical symptoms, death attributed to osteoporosis, adverse effect, bone mineral density (BMD), and biochemical indicators. Literature selection, data abstraction, quality evaluation, and data analysis were in accordance with Cochrane standards.Thirteen trials including 808 patients were included. Meta-analysis was not conducted because of the obvious clinical or statistical heterogeneity. Limited evidence suggested that moxibustion plus anti-osteoporosis medicine might be more effective in relieving the pain (visual analogue scale scores average changed 2 scores between groups, 4 trials), increasing the BMD of femoral neck (average changed 0.4 g/cm2 between groups, 3 trials), and improving the level of bone gla protein, osteoprotegerin and bone alkaline phosphatase (2 trials) compared with anti-osteoporosis medicine alone. However, the quality of previous studies was evaluated as generally poor. The safety evidence of moxibustion was still insufficient. Due to the paucity of high-quality studies, there was no definite conclusion about the efficacy and safety of moxibustion treating POP although parts of positive results were presented. Future research should pay attention to the dose-response relation and fracture incidence of moxibustion for POP.