Urinary Pentosidine levels negatively associates with trabecular bone scores in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Urinary pentosidine as a potential biomarker of impaired bone health: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Urinary pentosidine, an advanced glycation end product (AGE), has been proposed as a potential biomarker for impaired bone health, especially in older adults and those with diabetes. This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the association of urinary pentosidine with bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk.

Methods

A comprehensive search of Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted and records were gathered from 1960 to February 2024. Relevant papers were screened and data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Hedges' g standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to compare urinary pentosidine levels between patients with and without fractures.

Results

A total of 12 studies comprising 5,878 participants were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis revealed that patients with fractures had significantly higher urinary pentosidine levels compared to those without fractures (SMD [95% CI] = 0.53 [0.39-0.68]; I² = 54%; P < 0.01). In patients with vertebral fractures, pentosidine levels were also elevated (SMD [95% CI] = 0.51 [0.32-0.70]; I² = 64%; P < 0.01). Additionally, some studies demonstrated that an increase in urinary pentosidine was significantly associated with fracture risk (aHR = 1.20 [95% CI = 1.07-1.33]; P = 0.001) and BMD reduction (β = -0.125 [95% CI = -0.248, -0.002]; P = 0.047). However, other studies showed inconsistent results, particularly regarding the association between pentosidine and BMD or fracture risk in non-diabetic populations (aRR [95%CI] = 1.08 [0.79-1.49]; P = 0.6). Diagnostic accuracy analyses revealed a sensitivity of 71.9% and specificity of 61.2% for urinary pentosidine in predicting vertebral fracture in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that elevated urinary pentosidine levels are associated with an increased risk of fractures and, to a lesser extent, reduced bone mineral density. Its diagnostic accuracy improves when integrated with other clinical markers, such as BMD and bone turnover indices. However, due to the variability in results, further research is needed to standardize pentosidine's use as a reliable biomarker for impaired bone health in clinical practice.

Advanced Glycation End Products in Disease Development and Potential Interventions

Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are a group of compounds formed through non-enzymatic reactions between reducing sugars and proteins, lipids, or nucleic acids. AGEs can be generated in the body or introduced through dietary sources and smoking. Recent clinical and animal studies have highlighted the significant role of AGEs in various health conditions. These compounds accumulate in nearly all mammalian tissues and are associated with a range of diseases, including diabetes and its complications, cardiovascular disease, and neurodegeneration. This review summarizes the major diseases linked to AGE accumulation, presenting both clinical and experimental evidence. The pathologies induced by AGEs share common mechanisms across different organs, primarily involving oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, and direct protein cross-linking. Interventions targeting AGE-related diseases focus on inhibiting AGE formation using synthetic or natural antioxidants, as well as reducing dietary AGE intake through lifestyle modifications. AGEs are recognized as significant risk factors that impact health and accelerate aging, particularly in individuals with hyperglycemia. Monitoring AGE level and implementing nutritional interventions can help maintain overall health and reduce the risk of AGE-related complications.

Collagen glycosylation, hip structural analysis, and trabecular bone score in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study

Both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1D and T2D) are associated with poor bone health and an increased risk of fracture in adults. However, there are limited data regarding the effects of diabetes on the growing skeleton, particularly during adolescence, the time of peak bone mineral accretion. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in markers of bone health and factors that influence bone health in White adolescents and young adults with well-controlled T1D (n = 17; Average A1C 7.45 ± 1.15%) and control participants without T1D (n = 13). Age across both groups was similar (17.41 ± 1.62 years for T1D vs. 17.46 ± 1.45 years for controls) as was BMI and height. Bone density was measured at the lumbar spine, whole body, and proximal femur sites using the GE HealthCare's Lunar iDXA (GE; v11-30.062) in all subjects. Hip structural analysis (HSA) was performed at the proximal femur and Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) was calculated from AP spine image using Trabecular Osteo Software from Medimaps. Markers of bone formation, resorption, serum sclerostin and urine pentosidine were measured in all subjects. No difference in total body bone mineral density (BMD), lumbar spine BMD, lumbar spine BMAD, dual femur BMD, HSA variables or TBS measures were noted between subjects with T1D and controls. However, duration of diabetes had a significant negative correlation (p: 0.035) with cross-sectional moment of inertia (a measure of resistance to bending forces) in subjects with T1D. IGF-1 levels were marginally lower in the group with T1D (p:0.06) and had a significant inverse relationship (r: -0.406, p:0.026) with mean hip axis angle; a known predictor of hip fractures. TBS score had a marginally significant negative correlation with urinary pentosidine (a marker for collagen glycosylation) across both groups after adjusting for age (r: -0.343, p: 0.07), suggesting increased collagen glycosylation has an adverse impact on bone microarchitecture. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Advanced glycation and glycoxidation end products in bone

Hyperglycemia and oxidative stress, enhanced in diabetes and aging, result in excessive accumulation of advanced glycation and glycoxidation end products (AGEs/AGOEs) in bone. AGEs/AGOES are considered to be "the missing link" in explaining increased skeletal fragility with diabetes, aging, and osteoporosis where increased fracture risk cannot be solely explained by bone mass and/or fall incidences. AGEs/AGOEs disrupt bone turnover and deteriorate bone quality through alterations of organic matrix (collagen and non-collagenous proteins), mineral, and water content. AGEs and AGOEs are also associated with bone fragility in other conditions such as Alzheimer's disease, circadian rhythm disruption, and cancer. This review explains how AGEs and AGOEs accumulate in bone and impact bone quality and bone fracture, and how AGES/AGOEs are being targeted in preclinical and clinical investigations for inhibition or removal, and for prediction and management of diabetic, osteoporotic and insufficiency fractures.

Advanced glycation end products and bone - How do we measure them and how do they correlate with bone mineral density and fractures? A systematic review and evaluation of precision of measures

The role of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) in bone fragility especially in diabetic bone disease is increasingly recognized and researched. As skeletal frailty in diabetes does not correlate to bone mineral density (BMD) in the same way as in postmenopausal osteoporosis, BMD may not be a suitable measure of bone quality in persons with diabetes. Abundant research exists upon the effect of AGEs on bone, and though full understanding of the mechanisms of actions does not yet exist, there is little doubt of the clinical relevance. Thus, the measurement of AGEs as well as possible treatment effects on AGEs have become issues of interest. The aim of this report is to summarize results of measurements of AGEs. It consists of a systematic review of the existing literature on AGE measurements in clinical research, an evaluation of the precision of skin autofluorescence (SAF) measurement by AGE Reader® (Diagnoptics), and a short commentary on treatment of osteoporosis in patients with and without diabetes with respects to AGEs. We conclude that various AGE measures correlate well, both fluorescent and non-fluorescent and in different tissues, and that more than one target of measure may be used. However, pentosidine has shown good correlation with both bone measures and fracture risk in existing literature and results on SAF as a surrogate measurement is promising as some corresponding associations with fracture risk and bone measures are reported. As SAF measurements performed with the AGE Reader® display high precision and allow for a totally noninvasive procedure, conducting AGE measurements using this method has great potential and further research of its applicability is encouraged.

Association of skin autofluorescence with low bone density/osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures in type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) that abnormally accumulate in diabetic patients have been reported to damage bone health. We aimed to investigate the association between skin autofluorescence (SAF)-AGE_age (SAF - AGEs × age/100) and low bone density (LBD)/osteoporosis or major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

This study was nested in the prospective REACTION (Risk Evaluation of Cancers in Chinese Diabetic Individuals) study and included 1214 eligible participants. SAF was used to measure skin AGEs (SAF-AGEs). Fracture events were determined by an in-person clinical follow-up. Binary logistic regression analysis, linear regression analysis, and a restricted cubic spline nested in logistic models were used to test outcomes.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of LBD/osteoporosis in middle-aged or elderly T2DM patients was 35.7% (n = 434), and the overall incidence of MOFs was 10.5% (n = 116). Logistic analysis showed a significantly positive relationship between quartiles of SAF-AGE_age and the risk of LBD/osteoporosis (odds ratio [OR] 2.02, 95% CI 1.34-3.03; OR 3.63, CI 2.44-5.39; and OR 6.51, CI 4.34-9.78) for the multivariate-adjusted models, respectively. SAF-AGE_age was associated with MOFs with a multivariate-adjusted OR of 1.02 (CI 0.52-2.02), 2.42 (CI 1.32-4.46), and 2.70 (CI 1.48-4.91), respectively. Stratified analyses showed that SAF-AGE_age was significantly associated with MOFs only in females, nonsmokers, nondrinkers, individuals with lower body mass index, and those without LBD/osteoporosis. Linear regression analyses showed that higher SAF-AGEs were associated with a higher level of serum N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (s-PINP) and serum carboxy-terminal cross-linking peptide of type I collagen (s-CTX), with a multivariate-adjusted OR of 1.02 (CI 0.24-1.80) and 6.30 (CI 1.77-10.83), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, SAF-AGE_age was positively associated with the prevalence of LBD/osteoporosis or MOFs in patients with T2DM. A positive association between SAF-AGEs and the level of s-PINP and s-CTX was found.

Skin autofluorescence Is associated With low bone mineral density in type 2 diabetic patients

Although the risk of bone fracture is increased in type 2 diabetes (T2DM), bone mineral density (BMD) is increased rather than decreased. Accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) adversely influences the fracture resistance of bone in T2DM. We hypothesized that SAF is also associated with BMD levels in type 2 diabetic patients and aimed to evaluate the association of SAF with BMD and the presence of osteoporosis. This cross-sectional case-control study included 237 patients with T2DM (F/M: 133/104, 56.2±11.9 yrs) and 100 age- and sex-matched controls (F/M: 70/30, 54.8±8.8 yrs). Skin autofluorescence, a validated non-invasive measure of tissue AGEs, is used to detect the accumulation of AGEs in skin collagen using AGE Reader (DiagnOptics B.V., Groningen, The Netherlands). In addition, BMD was measured with DEXA (Lunar DPX-L). Patients with T2DM had higher SAF values compared to control group (2.21±0.53 AU vs. 1.79±0.33 AU, p < 0.001). Male subjects had higher SAF compared to women (2.34±0.53 AU vs. 2.11±0.50 AU, p < 0.001). Subjects with below -2.5 femoral neck or lumbar T scores had higher SAF measurements compared to subjects with normal T scores (2.46±0.53 AU vs. 2.18±0.52 AU, p = 0.006). Femoral neck BMD was lower in subjects with T2DM (0.946±0.345 g/cm² vs. 1.005±0.298 g/cm², p = 0.002). There was a negative correlation between SAF and femoral neck BMD (r=-0.24, p < 0.001), femoral neck T scores (r=-0.24, p < 0.001), L1-4 BMD (r=-0.10, p = 0.005), L1-4 T score (r=-0.16, p=0.001) and a positive correlation between SAF and age (r=0.44, p < 0.001), body mass index (r:0.16, p = 0.002) and HbA1c (r=0.37, p < 0.001). Accumulation of skin AGEs was increased, and BMD levels were decreased in diabetic patients. A negative association between SAF and BMD was detected, indicating a relationship between higher AGE accumulation and low BMD and osteoporosis in diabetic patients. Long-term prospective studies are needed to identify the practical use of SAF measurement in diabetic bone disease.

Evaluation of Quality and Bone Microstructure Alterations in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Narrative Review

Bone fragility is a common complication in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, traditional techniques for the evaluation of bone fragility, such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), do not perform well in this population. Moreover, the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) usually underestimates fracture risk in T2DM. Importantly, novel technologies for the assessment of one microarchitecture in patients with T2DM, such as the trabecular bone score (TBS), high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT), and microindentation, are emerging. Furthermore, different serum and urine bone biomarkers may also be useful for the evaluation of bone quality in T2DM. Hence, in this article, we summarize the limitations of conventional tools for the evaluation of bone fragility and review the current evidence on novel approaches for the assessment of quality and bone microstructure alterations in patients with T2DM.

Distributions of Microdamage Are Altered Between Trabecular Rods and Plates in Cancellous Bone From Men With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have an increased risk of fragility fracture despite exhibiting normal to high bone mineral density (BMD). Conditions arising from T2DM, such as reduced bone turnover and alterations in microarchitecture, may contribute to skeletal fragility by influencing bone morphology and microdamage accumulation. The objectives of this study were (i) to characterize the effect of T2DM on microdamage quantity and morphology in cancellous bone, and (ii) relate the accumulation of microdamage to the cancellous microarchitecture. Cancellous specimens from the femoral neck were collected during total hip arthroplasty (T2DM: n = 22, age = 65 ± 9 years, glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] = 7.00% ± 0.98%; non-diabetic [non-DM]: n = 25, age = 61 ± 8 years, HbA1c = 5.50% ± 0.4%), compressed to 3% strain, stained with lead uranyl acetate to isolate microdamage, and scanned with micro-computed tomography (μCT). Individual trabeculae segmentation was used to isolate rod-like and plate-like trabeculae and their orientations with respect to the loading axis. The T2DM group trended toward a greater BV/TV (+27%, p = 0.07) and had a more plate-like trabecular architecture (+8% BV_plates , p = 0.046) versus non-DM specimens. Rods were more damaged relative to their volume compared to plates in the non-DM group (DV_rods /BV_rods versus DV_plates /BV_plates : +49%, p < 0.0001), but this difference was absent in T2DM specimens. Longitudinal rods were more damaged in the non-DM group (DV_{longitudinal rods} /BV_{longitudinal rods} : +73% non-DM versus T2DM, p = 0.027). Total damage accumulation (DV/BV) and morphology (DS/DV) did not differ in T2DM versus non-DM specimens. These results provide evidence that cancellous microarchitecture does not explain fracture risk in T2DM, pointing to alterations in material matrix properties. In particular, cancellous bone from men with T2DM may have an attenuated ability to mitigate microdamage accumulation through sacrificial rods. © 2022 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Advanced glycation endproducts and bone quality: practical implications for people with type 2 diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at increased risk of fracture, often despite normal bone density. This observation suggests deficits in bone quality in the setting of abnormal glucose homeostasis. The goal of this article is to review recent developments in our understanding of how advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are incorporated into the skeleton with resultant deleterious effects on bone health and structural integrity in patients with T2D.

RECENT FINDINGS

The adverse effects of skeletal AGE accumulation on bone remodeling and the ability of the bone to deform and absorb energy prior to fracture have been demonstrated both at the bench as well as in small human studies; however, questions remain as to how these findings might be better explored in large, population-based investigations.

SUMMARY

Hyperglycemia drives systemic, circulating AGE formation with subsequent accumulation in the bone tissue. In those with T2D, studies suggest that AGEs diminish fracture resistance, though larger clinical studies are needed to better define the direct role of longstanding AGE accumulation on bone strength in humans as well as to motivate potential interventions to reverse or disrupt skeletal AGE deposition with the goal of fracture prevention.

Critical review of bone health, fracture risk and management of bone fragility in diabetes mellitus

The risk of fracture is increased in both type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, in contrast to the former, patients with T2DM usually possess higher bone mineral density. Thus, there is a considerable difference in the pathophysiological basis of poor bone health between the two types of diabetes. Impaired bone strength due to poor bone microarchitecture and low bone turnover along with increased risk of fall are among the major factors behind elevated fracture risk. Moreover, some antidiabetic medications further enhance the fragility of the bone. On the other hand, antiosteoporosis medications can affect the glucose homeostasis in these patients. It is also difficult to predict the fracture risk in these patients because conventional tools such as bone mineral density and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool score assessment can underestimate the risk. Evidence-based recommendations for risk evaluation and management of poor bone health in diabetes are sparse in the literature. With the advancement in imaging technology, newer modalities are available to evaluate the bone quality and risk assessment in patients with diabetes. The purpose of this review is to explore the pathophysiology behind poor bone health in diabetic patients. Approach to the fracture risk evaluation in both T1DM and T2DM as well as the pragmatic use and efficacy of the available treatment options have been discussed in depth.

Reference values for bone metabolism in a Japanese cohort survey randomly sampled from a basic elderly resident registry

The aim of this study was to provide definitive reference values for bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers in the general elderly population. Registered citizens of 50 to 89 years old were targeted for this survey. After random sampling from the resident registry of Obuse town, we established eight groups based on age (50 s, 60 s, 70 s, and 80 s) and gender. A total of 411 people were enrolled. We used a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry device to measure and evaluate BMD. The bone formation marker bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) was measured as a bone turnover marker. Bone quality marker pentosidine, and bone resorption markers including urinary total deoxypyridinoline (DPD), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b), 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D), and whole parathyroid hormone (PTH) were also measured as bone turnover markers. Sixty-three people (15.3%) were diagnosed as osteoporosis. BMD decreased with age in the femoral neck and total hip. On the other hand, there was no characteristic change with age in the lumber spine. As for bone markers, pentosidine and DPD increased with aging, although 25(OH)D, whole PTH, and BAP showed no characteristic associations with gender and aging. In terms of the relationship between low BMD and bone markers, there was a significant independent association between low BMD and TRACP-5b in females. In conclusions, hip BMD decreased with aging in men and women. However, there was no characteristic decline with aging in the lumbar spine. All bone markers showed no significant independent characteristics associated with age or gender in a multivariate analysis model, except for a significant association between low BMD and TRACP-5b in females. TRACP-5b was a potentially useful marker for the detection of low BMD.

Skin Autofluorescence, a Noninvasive Biomarker for Advanced Glycation End-Products, Is Associated With Prevalent Vertebral and Major Osteoporotic Fractures: The Rotterdam Study

Advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), which bind to type 1 collagen in bone and skin, have been implicated in reduced bone quality. The AGE reader™ measures skin autofluorescence (SAF), which might be regarded as a marker of long-term accumulation of AGEs in tissues. We investigated the association of SAF with bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures in the general population. We studied 2853 individuals from the Rotterdam Study with available SAF measurements (median age, 74.1 years) and with data on prevalent major osteoporotic (MOFs: hip, humerus, wrist, clinical vertebral) and vertebral fractures (VFs: clinical + radiographic Genant's grade 2 and 3). Radiographs were assessed 4 to 5 years before SAF. Multivariate regression models were performed adjusted for age, sex, BMI, creatinine, smoking status, and presence of diabetes and additionally for BMD with interaction terms to test for effect modification. Prevalence of MOFs was 8.5% and of VFs 7%. SAF had a curvilinear association with prevalent MOFs and VFs and therefore, age-adjusted, sex stratified SAF quartiles were used. The odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of the second, third and fourth quartiles of SAF for MOFs were as follows: OR 1.60 (95% CI, 1.08-2.35; p = .02); OR 1.30 (95% CI, 0.89-1.97; p = .20), and OR 1.40 (95% CI, 0.95-2.10; p = .09), respectively, with first (lowest) quartile as reference. For VFs the ORs were as follows: OR 1.69 (95% CI, 1.08-2.64; p = .02), OR 1.74(95% CI, 1.11-2.71; p = .01), and OR 1.73 (95% CI, 1.12-2.73; p = .02) for second, third, and fourth quartiles, respectively. When comparing the top three quartiles combined with the first quartile, the OR (95% CI) for MOFs was 1.43 (95% CI, 1.04-2.00; p = .03) and for VFs was 1.72 (95% CI, 1.18-2.53; p = .005). Additional adjustment for BMD did not change the associations. In conclusion, there is evidence of presence of a threshold of skin AGEs below which there is distinctly lower prevalence of fractures. Longitudinal analyses are needed to confirm our cross-sectional findings. © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Reduction of visceral fat could be related to the improvement of TBS in diabetes mellitus

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes has been proposed as a risk factor for increased skeletal fragility. Visceral fat is known to yield adverse effects on bone metabolism in people with diabetes. We investigated the relationship between the change in visceral fat mass over time and TBS or BMD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 690 (male: 367; female: 323) subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Visceral fat mass, lumbar and femoral neck BMD, and lumbar spine TBS were measured via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), including the follow-up data within a 3-year period.

RESULTS

TBS significantly increased as visceral fat mass decreased in both sexes (p < 0.001), whereas lumbar BMD and femoral neck BMD showed meaningful changes only in men. The multiple regression model with adjustment for age, weight, creatinine level, lipid profile, HbA1C, and status of osteoporosis medication use revealed that TBS and femoral neck BMD were correlated with visceral fat mass. However, regarding longitudinal changes, only the change in visceral fat mass had a significant relationship with TBS (males: β = - 0.298, p < 0.001; females: β = - 0.216, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study may suggest the beneficial effect of controlling visceral fat mass on bone health in type 2 diabetes patients. Besides, DXA-derived TBS could be a useful diagnostic tool for evaluating the bone changes according to metabolic changes in type 2 diabetes, which are not entirely achieved with BMD.

Association of glycaemic variables with trabecular bone score in post-menopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIM

To determine the relationship between bone microarchitecture, as measured by trabecular bone score, and advanced glycation end-product accumulation, as assessed by skin autofluorescence.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study. Participants were 64 post-menopausal women with type 2 diabetes and 175 post-menopausal women without diabetes. Trabecular bone score and skin autofluorescence data were obtained at time of bone density measurement.

RESULTS

Trabecular bone score and skin autofluorescence were inversely correlated in women with type 2 diabetes (r = -0.34, P = 0.006); no correlation was seen in post-menopausal women without diabetes (r = -0.029, P = 0.707). After adjustment, neither skin autofluorescence nor a diagnosis of diabetes were associated with trabecular bone score, but HbA_1c and waist circumference were independently associated with trabecular bone score.

CONCLUSION

Skin autofluorescence did not predict trabecular bone score. In contrast, glycaemia, as reflected by HbA_1c , and visceral adiposity, as reflected by waist circumference, were independently associated with trabecular bone score.

Current Knowledge Regarding the Interaction Between Oral Bone Metabolic Disorders and Diabetes Mellitus

Diabetes mellitus, a major chronic disease affecting human health, has been increasing in prevalence in recent years. Diabetes mellitus can cause bone metabolic disorders in patients, leading to osteoporosis, a higher risk of traumatic fracture, and other bone diseases. Bone metabolic disorders in the oral cavity principally manifest as periodontitis, loss of alveolar bone, and failure of implant osseointegration. In recent years, numerous studies have shown that there is a complex interaction between bone metabolic disorders and diabetes mellitus. This paper reviews the adverse effects of diabetes on oral bone metabolism disorders such as alveolar osteoporosis and bone loss in patients with periodontitis, discusses the potential mechanisms of diabetic bone loss, and suggests potential ways to prevent and treat oral bone loss in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Trabecular bone score and transilial bone trabecular histomorphometry in type 1 diabetes and healthy controls

Patients with type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) have an increased risk of fracture. Little is known about the microarchitecture of trabecular bone in T1DM, which may account for some of the increased risk. We report here a secondary analysis comparing Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) derived from DXA to 2-D histomorphometric and 3-D micro-computerized tomography (CT) variables obtained from iliac biopsies in 83 subjects (29 T1DM and 54 controls). The transilial bone biopsy specimens were fixed, embedded and scanned using a desktop micro-CT at 16 μm resolution. They were then sectioned and quantitative histomorphometry was performed. TBS of the anterior/posterior (AP) spine was obtained by re-analysis of AP lumbar spine DXA images. Overall, there were no differences in TBS, histomorphometry or micro-CT measurements between T1DM and controls. There was a significant association between TBS and 2-D BV/TV using multivariable linear regression after adjusting for group, age and gender. For every 1 unit increase in 2-D BV/TV, TBS increases by 0.0036 units after adjusting for group, gender and age. In conclusion, T1DM does not result in abnormal TBS, histomorphometric or micro-CT variables in young T1DM patients in the absence of diabetic complications. TBS is a good surrogate measure for trabecular microarchitecture.

Association between trabecular bone score and type 2 diabetes: a quantitative update of evidence

Patients with type 2 diabetes have an increased risk of fracture despite having a higher areal bone mineral density. This meta-analysis showed that compared with controls, diabetic patients had a lower trabecular bone score (TBS) than non-diabetic individuals, suggesting that TBS can be a useful measurement for the assessment of fracture risk in diabetic patients.

INTRODUCTION

The association between type 2 diabetes and trabecular bone score (TBS) has not been clear. The present study sought to answer the specific question of whether patients with type 2 diabetes have a lower TBS than those without diabetes.

METHODS

Using electronic and manual search, we identified 12 studies that had examined the association between type 2 diabetes and TBS between 2013 and 2019. These studies involved 35,546 women and 4962 men aged 30 years and older. We extracted the mean and standard deviation of TBS for patients with and without diabetes. The synthesis of effect sizes was done by the random effects meta-analysis model.

RESULTS

Patients with diabetes had significantly lower TBS than those without diabetes, with standardized mean difference being - 0.31 (95% CI, - 0.45 to - 0.16). The difference was greater in women (- 0.50; 95% CI, - 0.69 to - 0.32) than in men (- 0.04; 95% CI, - 0.17 to 0.10). Compared with normal individuals, those with prediabetes had significantly lower TBS (d = - 0.13; 95% CI, - 0.23 to - 0.04; P = 0.005). There was heterogeneity between the studies, with the index of inconsistency (I²) ranging from 92% (in women) to 69.5% (in men).

CONCLUSION

Patients with type 2 diabetes have a lower TBS than non-diabetic individuals, suggesting that TBS can be a useful measurement for the assessment of fracture risk in diabetic patients.

Bone mineral density in diabetes and impaired fasting glucose

We report that compared with normoglycaemia, post-menopausal women (non-obese and obese) with diabetes had higher lumbar spine bone mineral density (LSBMD). Femoral neck bone mineral density (FNBMD) was higher in obese post-menopausal women with diabetes. Only non-obese post-menopausal women with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) had a higher LSBMD than normoglycaemia. No other associations with IFG were observed.

INTRODUCTION

Individuals with diabetes have a higher or normal bone mineral density (BMD) compared with those without diabetes. However, paradoxically, they also have a higher fracture risk. It is not clear whether those with IFG also have altered BMD. This study aimed to determine whether individuals with IFG have elevated or normal BMD.

METHODS

Women (n = 858) and men (n = 970) (aged 20-80 years) from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study were included. IFG was defined as fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 5.5-6.9 mmol/L and diabetes as FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, use of antihyperglycaemic medication and/or self-report. Using multivariable linear regression, the relationships between glycaemia and BMD at the femoral neck and lumbar spine were examined, and adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), and other variables. In women, two interaction terms were identified: menopause × glycaemia and BMI × glycaemia, and thus, the analyses were stratified by menopause and obesity status (BMI cut point ≥ 30 kg/m²).

RESULTS

There were no associations between glycaemic status and BMD for pre-menopausal women. For non-obese post-menopausal women, there was no association between FNBMD and glycaemic status, but women with IFG or diabetes had higher LSBMD than those with normoglycaemia (7.1% and 9.7%, respectively, both p < 0.01). Obese post-menopausal women with diabetes had a higher FNBMD (8.8%, p = 0.008) and LSBMD (12.2%, p < 0.001), but those with IFG were not different from the normoglycaemia group. There were no associations detected between glycaemic status and BMD in men.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we report that compared with normoglycaemia, post-menopausal women (non-obese and obese) with diabetes had higher LSBMD. FNBMD was higher in obese post-menopausal women with diabetes. Only non-obese post-menopausal women with IFG had a higher LSBMD than normoglycaemia. No other associations with IFG were observed.

Association between pre-diabetes, type 2 diabetes and trabecular bone score: The Vietnam Osteoporosis Study

AIMS

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a surrogate indicator of bone microarchitecture. The present study sought to examine the association between type 2 diabetes (T2D) and trabecular bone score (TBS) in adult Vietnamese men and women.

METHODS

The study was part of the Vietnam Osteoporosis Study, in which 2702 women and 1398 men aged ≥30 years were recruited from the general community in Ho Chi Minh City. HbA_1c levels were measured by the ADAMS™ A_1c HA-8160 (Arkray, Kyoto, Japan), and classified into 3 groups: normal if HbA_1c < 5.7%; pre-diabetes (5.7-6.4%); and diabetes (>6.4%). TBS was evaluated by iNsight Software, version 2.1 (Medimaps, Merignac, France) on lumbar spine BMD scan (Hologic Horizon). Differences in TBS between diabetic status were analyzed by the multivariable regression model with adjustment for age and body mass index.

RESULTS

The prevalence of pre-diabetes and diabetes in men and women was 30.2% and 8.3%, respectively. In women, TBS was lower in pre-diabetes (-0.02; P < 0.001) and diabetes (-0.02; P < 0.001) compared with normal individuals. In men, there was no statistically significant difference in TBS between diabetic status. Moreover, TBS was significantly inversely correlated with HbA_1c levels in women (P = 0.01), but not in men (P = 0.89).

CONCLUSION

Women, but not men, with type 2 diabetes and pre-diabetes have lower TBS than individuals without diabetes. These data suggest that diabetes and prediabetes are associated with deterioration of bone microarchitecture.

Update on the impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on bone metabolism and material properties

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing worldwide, especially as a result of our aging society, high caloric intake and sedentary lifestyle. Besides the well-known complications of T2DM on the cardiovascular system, the eyes, kidneys and nerves, bone strength is also impaired in diabetic patients. Patients with T2DM have a 40-70% increased risk for fractures, despite having a normal to increased bone mineral density, suggesting that other factors besides bone quantity must account for increased bone fragility. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the complex effects of T2DM on bone including effects on bone cells, bone material properties and other endocrine systems that subsequently affect bone, discusses the effects of T2DM medications on bone and concludes with a model identifying factors that may contribute to poor bone quality and increased bone fragility in T2DM.

Skeletal Fragility in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with an increased risk of fracture, which has been reported in several epidemiological studies. However, bone mineral density in T2D is increased and underestimates the fracture risk. Common risk factors for fracture do not fully explain the increased fracture risk observed in patients with T2D. We propose that the pathogenesis of increased fracture risk in T2D is due to low bone turnover caused by osteocyte dysfunction resulting in bone microcracks and fractures. Increased levels of sclerostin may mediate the low bone turnover and may be a novel marker of increased fracture risk, although further research is needed. An impaired incretin response in T2D may also affect bone turnover. Accumulation of advanced glycosylation endproducts may also impair bone strength. Concerning antidiabetic medication, the glitazones are detrimental to bone health and associated with increased fracture risk, and the sulphonylureas may increase fracture risk by causing hypoglycemia. So far, the results on the effect of other antidiabetics are ambiguous. No specific guideline for the management of bone disease in T2D is available and current evidence on the effects of antiosteoporotic medication in T2D is sparse. The aim of this review is to collate current evidence of the pathogenesis, detection and treatment of diabetic bone disease.

Assessment of bone quality in patients with diabetes mellitus

Substantial evidence exists that diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures. Low bone strength as well as bone extrinsic factors are probably contributing to the increased bone fragility in diabetes. Bone density and quality are important determinants of bone strength. Although bone mineral density (BMD) and the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) are very useful clinical tools in assessing bone strength, they may underestimate the fracture risk in diabetes mellitus. Through advances in new technologies such as trabecular bone score (TBS) and peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), we can better assess the bone quality and fracture risk of patients with diabetes mellitus. Invasive assessments such as microindentation and histomorphometry have been great complement to the existing bone analysis techniques. Bone turnover markers have been found to be altered in diabetes mellitus patients and may be associated with fractures. This review will give a brief summary of the current development and clinical uses of these assessments.