How to avoid misinterpretation of dual reporter gene assay data affected by cell damage

The differences in drug disposition gene induction by rifampicin and rifabutin are unlikely due to different effects on important pregnane X receptor (NR1I2) splice variants

Rifampicin and rifabutin can activate the pregnane X receptor (PXR, NR1I2), thereby inducing pharmacokinetically important genes/proteins and reducing exposure to co-administered drugs. Because induction effects vary considerably between these antibiotics, differences could be due to unequal rifamycin-induced activation or tissue expression of the three major NR1I2 splice variants, PXR.1 (NM_003889), PXR.2 (NM_022002), and PXR.3 (NM_033013). Consequently, PXR activation (PXR reporter gene assays) and mRNA expression levels of total NR1I2, PXR.1, PXR.2, and PXR.3 were investigated by polymerase chain reaction in colon and liver samples from eleven surgical patients, in LS180 cells, and primary human hepatocytes. Compared to the colon, total NR1I2 mRNA expression was higher in the liver. Both tissues showed similar expression levels of PXR.1 and PXR.3, respectively. PXR.2 was not quantifiable in the colon samples. Rifampicin and rifabutin similarly enhanced PXR.1 and PXR.2 activity when transfected into LS180 cells, while PXR.3 could not be activated. In LS180 cells, rifampicin (10 μM) reduced total NR1I2 and PXR.3 expression 2-fold after 24 h, while rifabutin (10 μM) increased total NR1I2, PXR.1, PXR.2, and PXR.3 mRNA by approx. 50% after 96-h exposure. In primary human hepatocytes, rifampicin (10 μM) suppressed total NR1I2, PXR.1, and PXR.3 after 48-h exposure, and rifabutin (10 μM) had no significant impact on total NR1I2 or any of the splice variants studied. In conclusion, both antibiotics activated the studied PXR splice variants similarly but modified their expression differently. While rifampicin can suppress mRNA of PXR forms, rifabutin rather increases their expression levels.

Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay for Prescreening CRISPR (d)Cas9-Mediated Epigenetic Editing on a Plant Promoter Using Human Cells

Epigenetic editing, also known as EpiEdit, offers an exciting way to control gene expression without altering the DNA sequence. In this study, we evaluate the application of EpiEdit to plant promoters, specifically the MLO (mildew locus o) gene promoter. We use a modified CRISPR-(d)Cas9 system, in which the nuclease-deficient Cas9 (dCas9) is fused to an epigenetic modifier, to experimentally demonstrate the utility of this tool for optimizing epigenetic engineering of a plant promoter prior to in vivo plant epigenome editing. Guide RNAs are used to deliver the dCas9-epigenetic modifier fusion protein to the target gene sequence, where it induces modification of MLO gene expression. We perform preliminary experiments using a plant promoter cloned into the luciferase reporter system, which is transfected into a human system and analyzed using the dual-luciferase reporter assay. The results suggest that this approach may be useful in the early stages of plant epigenome editing, as it can aid in the selection of appropriate modifications to the plant promoter prior to conducting in vivo experiments under plant system conditions. Overall, the results demonstrate the potential of CRISPR (d)Cas9-based EpiEdit for precise and controlled regulation of gene expression.

Comprehensive in vitro analysis evaluating the variable drug-drug interaction risk of rifampicin compared to rifabutin

Compared to rifampicin (600 mg/day), standard doses of rifabutin (300 mg/day) have a lower risk of drug-drug interactions due to induction of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) or P-glycoprotein (Pgp/ABCB1) mediated by the pregnane X receptor (PXR). However, clinical comparisons with equal rifamycin doses or in vitro experiments respecting actual intracellular concentrations are lacking. Thus, the genuine pharmacological differences and the potential molecular mechanisms of the discordant perpetrator effects are unknown. Consequently, the cellular uptake kinetics (mass spectrometry), PXR activation (luciferase reporter gene assays), and impact on CYP3A4 and Pgp/ABCB1 expression and activity (polymerase chain reaction, enzymatic assays, flow cytometry) were evaluated in LS180 cells after treatment with different rifampicin or rifabutin concentrations for variable exposure times and eventually normalized to actual intracellular concentrations. In addition, inhibitory effects on CYP3A4 and Pgp activities were investigated. While rifampicin is poorly taken up by LS180 cells, it strongly activates PXR and leads to enhanced expression and activity of CYP3A4 and Pgp. In contrast, rifabutin is a significantly less potent and less efficient PXR activator and gene inducer, despite sixfold to eightfold higher intracellular accumulation. Finally, rifabutin is a potent inhibitor of Pgp (IC50 = 0.3 µM) compared to rifampicin (IC50 = 12.9 µM). Together, rifampicin and rifabutin significantly differ by their effects on the regulation and function of CYP3A4 and Pgp, even when controlled for intracellular concentrations. Rifabutin's concurrent Pgp inhibitory action might partly compensate the inducing effects, explaining its weaker clinical perpetrator characteristics.