Osteoporosis therapies: evidence from health-care databases and observational population studies

What personal factors are associated with osteoporosis, fragility fracture, and osteopenia? A population-level analysis using the United Kingdom Biobank

PURPOSE

Osteopenia, osteoporosis, and fragility fractures pose a major public health concern. Population-level clinical and biopsychosocial data may uncover modifiable risk factors to target when developing whole person approaches to managing these conditions. The purpose of this study was to identify personal risk factors associated with osteoporosis, fragility fractures, and osteopenia from the United Kingdom Biobank (UKB) - a large population-level database.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study using the UKB to evaluate the association between 39 systematically selected explanatory variables with a diagnosis of osteopenia, osteoporosis, or fragility fracture. Bivariate analysis was performed followed by multivariable logistic regression adjusting for multicollinearity using covariance testing.

RESULTS

Of 502,507 patients in the UKB, 40,657 had complete bone mineral density information from DEXA scans, and 32,193 had sustained a fragility fracture in the previous five years. In multivariable regression, increased time spent watching television (OR 1.15), living in an area with a high index of deprivation (OR 1.14), infrequent visits from friends and family (OR 1.09), experiencing symptoms of anxiety (OR 1.09), experiencing symptoms of depression (OR 1.08), and decreased exercise frequency (OR 1.03), were associated with increased risk of osteoporosis. Decreased exercise frequency (OR 1.27), increased BMI (OR 1.2), living in an area with a high index of deprivation (OR 1.11), and decreased salary (OR 1.10) were associated with increased risk of fragility fracture. Symptoms of anxiety (OR 1.15), living in an area with a high index of deprivation (OR 1.13), and increased time spent watching television (OR 1.11), living alone (OR 1.08), and symptoms of depression (OR 1.06), were associated with increased risk of osteopenia (p < 0.05 for all variables).

CONCLUSION

Analysis of population-level datasets reveal a range of modifiable mental, social, and lifestyle/behavioral health factors that can inform multidisciplinary team-based care, including strategies that respond to psychosocial concerns and sustaining healthy lifestyles and behaviors in patients experiencing osteoporosis, fragility fracture, and osteopenia. Future work should assess the impact of integrated, whole person management programs for these conditions on longitudinal outcomes.

Long-term persistence with denosumab: real-world data from the Austrian Osteoporosis Clinic (AOC). A retrospective data analysis

In short-term studies, persistence with denosumab has been higher than with other osteoporosis drugs. This study shows that persistence can be maintained in the long-term and is associated with efficacy and safety parameters.

PURPOSE

To assess long-term persistence with denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Secondary purposes were the evaluation of changes in efficacy and tolerance/safety parameters over time.

METHODS

Persistence was determined by number and rate of patients receiving denosumab on time in 6-month intervals (+ / - 8 weeks). The total population was stratified by internal patients (injections and monitoring at the Austrian Osteoporosis Clinic [AOC], 74%) and external patients (injections at the practitioner's office with occasional monitoring at the AOC, 26%). In internal patients, efficacy parameters including bone mineral density (BMD) and the bone marker CTX were assessed at fixed time points and tolerance/safety parameters including side effects (SEs), adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs) evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 851 patients, 71% (73% internal and 64% external) were persistent at 7.5 years of follow-up. The mean rate of cumulative persistence in internal patients decreased from 94% at the time of the second dose to 73% at the time of the fifteenth dose. BMD increased and CTX decreased, overall and in pairwise comparisons (all p < .001). AEs and SAEs, but not SEs, were lower in persistent than non-persistent patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study showing that long-term (> 3 years) real-world persistence with denosumab could be maintained at a high level (> 70%) in most patients. Denosumab was well tolerated and associated with decreased CTX levels and increased BMD.

Age-related prevalence of osteoporosis and fragility fractures: real-world data from an Austrian Menopause and Osteoporosis Clinic

OBJECTIVES

Age and bone mineral density (BMD) are the most relevant determinants for public health authorities to govern the management of osteoporosis. The objectives of this study were to determine the age-related prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis according to WHO criteria and fragility fractures in middle-aged and older women.

METHODS

Women ≥40 years, who were referred to a menopause and osteoporosis outpatient clinic for BMD measurements, were assessed for patient characteristics, BMD and previous fragility fractures of the hip, the distal forearm and the vertebrae. Only records of their initial consultations were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Between 1990 and 2012, 99,399 women, mean age 56.1 years, were referred to the clinic for BMD testing. Of the total population, 52.5% showed normal, 34.0% osteopenic and 13.5% osteoporotic BMD. Fragility fractures were reported by 6540 patients, with 3070 (47%) non-vertebral fractures, namely 2518 (38.5%) distal forearm and 552 (8.4%) hip fractures; 66.8% of patients with the non-vertebral fractures were <65 years.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of osteoporosis and fragility fractures in middle-aged women, < 65 years, is hitherto under-recognized. Measuring BMD alone is not sufficient to identify patients at risk for fractures. Supplemental screening for clinical risk factors already during perimenopause may be advantageous.

Fracture Rate, Quality of Life and Back Pain in Patients with Osteoporosis Treated with Teriparatide: 24-Month Results from the Extended Forsteo Observational Study (ExFOS)

We describe the pre-planned interim analysis of fracture outcomes, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and back pain in patients with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide for up to 24 months in the Extended Forsteo (Forsteo(®) is a registered trade name of Eli Lilly and Company) Observational Study (ExFOS), a prospective, multinational, observational study. Data on incident clinical fractures, HRQoL (EQ-5D questionnaire) and back pain [100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS)] were collected. The number of patients with fractures was summarised in 6-month intervals and fracture rate over each 6-month period was assessed using logistic regression for repeated measures. Changes from baseline in EQ-5D and back pain VAS were analysed using mixed models for repeated measures. Of 1454 patients in the active treatment cohort, 90.6 % were female and 14.4 % were taking glucocorticoids. During teriparatide treatment (median duration 23.7 months), 103 patients (7.1 %) sustained a total of 122 incident clinical fractures (21 % vertebral, 79 % non-vertebral). A 49 % decrease in the odds of fractures and a 75 % decrease in the odds of clinical vertebral fractures were observed in the >18- to 24-month period versus the first 6-month period (both p < 0.05). EQ-5D scores and back pain VAS scores were significantly improved from baseline at each post-baseline observation during teriparatide treatment. In conclusion, patients with severe osteoporosis showed a significant reduction in the incident fracture rate during 24 months of teriparatide treatment in routine clinical practice, accompanied by a significant improvement in HRQoL and reduction in back pain. Results should be interpreted in the context of the non-controlled design of this observational study.

Proportion of osteoporotic women remaining at risk for fracture despite adherence to oral bisphosphonates

BACKGROUND

Adherence to oral bisphosphonates is often low, but even adherent patients may remain at elevated fracture risk. The goal of this study was to estimate the proportion of bisphosphonate-adherent women remaining at high risk of fracture.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of women aged 50years and older, adherent to oral bisphosphonates for at least two years was identified, and data were extracted from a multi-system health information exchange. Adherence was defined as having a dispensed medication possession ratio≥0.8. The primary outcome was clinical occurrence of: low trauma fracture (months 7-36), persistent T-score≤-2.5 (months 13-36), decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) at any skeletal site≥5%, or the composite of any one of these outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 7435 adherent women, 3110 had either pre- or post-adherent DXA data. In the full cohort, 7% had an incident osteoporotic fracture. In 601 women having both pre- and post-adherent DXA to evaluate BMD change, 6% had fractures, 22% had a post-treatment T-score≤-2.5, and 16% had BMD decrease by ≥5%. The composite outcomes occurred in 35%. Incident fracture was predicted by age, previous fracture, and a variety of co-morbidities, but not by race, glucocorticoid treatment or type of bisphosphonate.

CONCLUSION

Despite bisphosphonate adherence, 7% had incident osteoporotic fractures and 35% had either fracture, decreases in BMD, or persistent osteoporotic BMD, representing a substantial proportion of treated patients in clinical practices remaining at risk for future fractures. Further studies are required to determine the best achievable goals for osteoporosis therapy, and which patients would benefit from alternate therapies.

Persistence with denosumab and persistence with oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a retrospective, observational study, and a meta-analysis

The objectives of this study were to estimate persistence with denosumab and put these results in context by conducting a review of persistence with oral bisphosphonates. Persistence with denosumab was found to be higher than with oral bisphosphonates.

PURPOSE

This study had two objectives: to analyse persistence in Swedish women initiating denosumab for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) and to put these findings in context by conducting a literature review and meta-analysis of persistence data for oral bisphosphonates.

METHODS

The study used the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and included women aged at least 50 years initiating denosumab between May 2010 and July 2012. One injection of denosumab was defined as 6-month persistence. Women were considered persistent for another 6 months if they filled their next prescription within 6 months + 56 days and survival analysis applied to the data. A literature search was conducted in PubMed to identify retrospective studies of persistence with oral bisphosphonates and pooled persistence estimates were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The study identified 2,315 women who were incident denosumab users. Mean age was 74 years and 61% had been previously treated for PMO. At 12 and 24 months, persistence with denosumab was 83% (95% CI, 81-84%) and 62% (95% CI, 60-65%), respectively. The literature search identified 40 articles for inclusion in the meta-analysis. At 12 and 24 months, persistence with oral bisphosphonates ranged from 10% to 78% and from 16% to 46%, with pooled estimates of 45% and 30%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These data from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and literature review suggest that persistence was higher with denosumab than with oral bisphosphonates.

Teriparatide use during an economic crisis: baseline data from the Greek cohort of the Extended Forsteo Observational Study (ExFOS)

BACKGROUND

The Extended Forsteo Observational Study (ExFOS) is a multinational, non-interventional, prospective, observational study that aims to provide real-life data on patients with osteoporosis treated with teriparatide for up to 24 months. It includes the new indications of osteoporosis in men and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). We describe the Greek subpopulation enrolled in this study and compare it with a similar cohort from the previous European Forsteo Observational Study (EFOS).

METHODS

Baseline data were collected from the Greek cohort of ExFOS. Data included demographic characteristics, medical and osteoporosis history, disease status, prior use of medications, back pain and quality of life.

RESULTS

Baseline data for 439 patients, enrolled at 31 sites, indicated the majority of patients were females (92.3%), elderly [mean (standard deviation; SD) age 70.1 (9.8) years] and slightly overweight [mean (SD) body mass index 26.7 (4.3) kg/m(2)], with very low bone mineral density (mean T-score <-3 in lumbar spine or total hip) and at least one previous fracture (55.1% of patients). Of the 439 patients, 19.8% were osteoporosis treatment naïve, 88.4% had experienced back pain during the previous 12 months, 68.1% had experienced back pain at least fairly often during the previous month and 50.9% reported moderate to severe limitation of activities due to back pain, with a mean (SD) of 4.2 (7.7) days spent in bed because of back pain during the previous month. Most baseline characteristics were numerically similar between the female ExFOS and EFOS cohorts; however, the rate of enrolment was faster in ExFOS (by approximately 45%) and a history of fracture was recorded in 53.8% of female patients in ExFOS versus 74.5% in EFOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Greek patients prescribed teriparatide in ExFOS had severe osteoporosis with a high risk of fractures and back pain. Female patients shared similarities with EFOS counterparts, reflecting a constant prescribing profile for use of teriparatide, although a noticeable difference in fracture history between the two study cohorts may indicate a change towards prescribing in less severely affected patients. The economic crisis in Greece did not appear to affect patient enrolment. Data are interpreted in the context of an observational setting.

Japan Fracture Observational Study (JFOS): patient characteristics and interim data on the use of daily teriparatide in Japanese patients with osteoporosis

OBJECTIVES

This report from the Japan Fracture Observational Study (JFOS) describes the design of the study, baseline characteristics of the patients, and interim results.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This is an interim analysis from an ongoing observational study of male and female patients with osteoporosis initiating daily teriparatide treatment observed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. There was no control group. Baseline data were collected on demographic characteristics, medical and osteoporosis history, prior use of medications and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This interim analysis includes preliminary information concerning incidence of clinical fractures, bone mineral density (BMD), procollagen type 1 aminoterminal propeptide (P1NP), back pain, HRQoL, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Baseline observations were completed for 1810 patients; 90.1% were female. Compared with osteoporotic patients treated with teriparatide in other observational studies, those in JFOS were older but had fewer osteoporosis risk factors. The incidence of clinical fractures was 2.9% at 6 months and 3.7% at 12 months. At 12 months, mean BMD was 8.9% higher at the lumbar spine and 0.8% higher at the total hip compared to baseline. At 6 months, the median serum concentration of P1NP was 187.7% higher than at baseline. At 12 months, back pain scores assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) were lower and HRQoL scores were higher than at baseline. No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report from an observational study of daily teriparatide in Japanese osteoporotic patients at high risk of fractures. Patients in JFOS were older but had fewer osteoporosis risk factors than those treated with teriparatide in other observational studies. The interim analysis suggests that the clinical profile of teriparatide in the real world is similar to that observed in clinical trials and observational studies conducted in Europe and the United States.

Long-term fracture rates seen with continued ibandronate treatment: pooled analysis of DIVA and MOBILE long-term extension studies

Ibandronate reduces the risk of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures versus placebo in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. This analysis, in which fractures were reported as safety events, showed that long-term use of ibandronate was associated with low fracture rates over 5 years of treatment.

INTRODUCTION

A previous post-hoc meta-analysis of 2-3 year studies found that ibandronate regimens with annual cumulative exposure (ACE) of ≥10.8 mg reduced the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures (NVFs) versus placebo in postmenopausal women. This post-hoc analysis used individual patient data from the 2-year monthly oral ibandronate in ladies (MOBILE) and dosing intravenous administration (DIVA) studies, including the 3-year long-term extensions (LTEs), to assess fracture risk in patients treated with ibandronate for 5 years.

METHODS

Patients treated for 2 years in MOBILE with monthly oral ibandronate 150 mg (n = 176) and in DIVA with IV ibandronate every 2 months 2 mg (n = 253) or quarterly 3 mg (n = 263) who continued on the same regimens for 3 additional years in the LTEs were included. Three-year placebo data (n = 1,924) were obtained from the ibandronate osteoporosis vertebral fracture trial in North America and Europe (BONE) and IV Fracture Prevention trials. The primary endpoint was clinical fracture rate; clinical fracture data were collected as adverse events. Time to fracture was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and statistical analysis was conducted using the log-rank test. All clinical fractures included all NVFs and symptomatic vertebral fractures.

RESULTS

For ibandronate regimens with ACE ≥10.8 mg, time to fracture was significantly longer for all clinical fractures, NVFs, and clinical vertebral fractures versus placebo (P = 0.005). For all fracture types, the rate of fracture appeared stable during the 5-year treatment period.

CONCLUSION

In women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, continuous treatment with ibandronate over 5 years results in low sustained clinical fracture rate.

Differences in adherence to osteoporosis regimens: a 2-year analysis of a population treated under specific guidelines

BACKGROUND

Patients' adherence to antiosteoporotic drug therapy is essential to prevent fracture and complications of osteoporosis over the long term. The guidance given in treating osteoporosis can potentially enhance adherence.

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to compare adherence to osteoporosis regimens by patients treated under specific guidelines in a medical center.

METHODS

This study used a database pertaining to the use of antiosteoporotic medication, including alendronate, raloxifene, and calcitonin, between 2001 and 2007. We selected patients who were being treated following the therapeutic recommendations of the National Osteoporosis Foundation or the guideline for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis recommended by the American College of Rheumatology. Adherence was determined by compliance and the persistence ratio (PR). Compliance was estimated by using the medication possession rate, and PR was determined by the percentage of patients with no medication refill gap for a period of ≥30 days.

RESULTS

A total of 2975 patients met the inclusion criteria. The patients were grouped according to treatment regimen: alendronate, n = 1745; raloxifene, n = 711; and calcitonin, n = 519. The good compliance rate (GCR; medication possession rate ≥80%) for alendronate, raloxifene, and calcitonin was 61.9%, 54.6%, and 36.4% at year 1 (P < 0.001), respectively. The GCR of alendronate was significantly higher than that for either raloxifene (P = 0.001) or calcitonin (P < 0.001). The GCR of the alendronate, raloxifene, and calcitonin groups at year 3 was 47.9%, 43.7%, and 36.4% of the included patients (P < 0.001). The PR of the alendronate, raloxifene, and calcitonin groups at year 1 was 57.1%, 50.2%, and 32.9% (P < 0.001) and 41.8%, 40.1%, and 23.5% (P < 0.001) at year 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Alendronate had a better adherence profile than raloxifene and calcitonin at the end of year 1 and a better adherence profile than calcitonin at the end of year 2.

Osteoporosis treatment: why ibandronic acid?

INTRODUCTION

In this article, we have summarized the specific evidence on ibandronic acid (or ibandronate) efficacy, tolerability, and feasibility acquired from trials and clinical use.

AREAS COVERED

This critical review focuses on evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials, meta-analyses, surrogate markers, bridging trials, long-term extension studies, observational studies, clinical experiences in osteoporosis in addition to postmenopausal treatment adherence in clinical practice, and safety profile of ibandronic acid.

EXPERT OPINION

Pivotal studies on ibandronic acid efficacy in terms of antifracture effects on nonvertebral fractures had some intrinsic limitations. However, a large body of indirect evidence suggests that ibandronate has significantly sustained vertebral and nonvertebral antifracture efficacies in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, in comparison to those observed with other nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. Discrepancies in efficacy between the available bisphosphonate regimens appear to be a function of dose rather than to inherent differences in their respective therapeutic potential. Drugs or treatment regimens that minimize the risk of osteoporotic fractures and make the treatment of osteoporosis more convenient and suitable for patients are preferred: ibandronic acid marketed at oral doses of 150 mg once monthly and 3 mg quarterly as intravenous injection has these characteristics. The safety profile of ibandronic acid treatment appears to be good overall and in some cases better than that of other nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates.

A large prospective European cohort study of patients treated with strontium ranelate and followed up over 3 years

Strontium ranelate has been available as an osteoporosis treatment in Europe since 2004. This article describes a large European observational survey of the use of strontium ranelate in clinical daily practice. A retrospective observational registry included 32,446 women consulting for postmenopausal osteoporosis in seven countries. Within the registry, 12,046 women were receiving strontium ranelate and were followed up over 3 years. The baseline characteristics of the follow-up cohort were similar to those of the whole registry cohort (age, 68.9 ± 10.3 years; body mass index, 25.6 ± 4.3 kg/m(2); lumbar spine T-score, -2.57 ± 0.85 SD; femoral neck T-score, -2.11 ± 0.86 SD). At baseline, 77 % of patients had at least one risk factor for osteoporosis, and 46 % had a previous history of osteoporotic fracture. Mean duration of follow-up was 32.0 ± 9.7 months, and treatment duration was 25.2 ± 13.7 months (24,956 patient-years of treatment). Persistence with strontium ranelate was 80 % at 1 year, 68 % at 2 years, and 64 % at 32 months; most patients (about 80 %) reported rarely omitting a dose. At least one emergent adverse event was reported in 2,674 (22 %) patients, most frequently gastrointestinal side effects. The crude incidence of venous thromboembolic events was 2.1/1,000 patient-years. No cases of hypersensitivity reactions, such as drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), Steven-Johnson syndrome, or toxic epidermal necrolysis, were reported. During follow-up, a fracture occurred in 890 patients (7 %); 429 of the fractures were nonvertebral fractures. Our observational survey over 32 months indicated good rates of adherence with strontium ranelate and confirmed its good safety profile in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Evidence of sustained vertebral and nonvertebral antifracture efficacy with ibandronate therapy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The antifracture efficacy of ibandronate at vertebral and nonvertebral sites was assessed.

METHODS

A literature review of randomized phase III clinical trials, meta-analyses or observational studies that reported fracture endpoints or surrogate markers, and compared ibandronate with placebo or an active comparator.

RESULTS

In a phase III study, 2.5 mg daily oral ibandronate reduced the incidence of new vertebral fractures versus placebo and the relative risk reduction (RRR) was sustained over 3 years (62%; p = 0.0001). In two bridging studies, oral ibandronate 150 mg once monthly and 3 mg quarterly intravenous (i.v.) were superior to oral 2.5 mg daily in producing bone mineral density (BMD) increases at all sites over 2 years (p < 0.05). These improvements were sustained over 5 years. In meta-analyses of pivotal ibandronate studies, doses equivalent to annual cumulative exposure (ACE) ≥ 10.8 mg (including 150 mg once monthly and 3 mg quarterly i.v.) significantly reduced the incidence of nonvertebral fractures versus placebo or ACE 5.5 mg (2.5 mg daily) (RRR 29.9% and 38%, respectively; p < 0.05). Therefore, prevention of nonvertebral fractures was found in all patients with the commercially available highest doses, and not only in high-risk patients as observed in randomized clinical trials with lower doses. Finally, a 12-month, observational study of claims databases reported comparable rates of nonvertebral fractures and a statistically significantly lower rate of vertebral fractures (p < 0.01) with ibandronate versus weekly bisphosphonates.

CONCLUSION

A large body of evidence suggests that ibandronate has sustained vertebral and nonvertebral antifracture efficacy in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.