Pharmacokinetics and safety of a novel anti-HBs-enriched immunoglobulin in healthy volunteers after subcutaneous and intramuscular administration

Personalized subcutaneous administration of hepatitis B surface antibodies without nucleos(t)ide analogs for patients at risk of renal failure after liver transplantation: a prospective single center cohort study

Currently, nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) in monotherapy are favored as prophylaxis against hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation. However, in patients at risk of renal failure, renal safety of NAs is of concern. We investigated the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIG) in monotherapy. This is a single-arm prospective trial in patients transplanted >1 year. We included 43 Caucasian patients. The majority was treated with calcineurin inhibitors, and several patients had other risk factors for renal impairment as well: diabetes mellitus (n = 10/43), arterial hypertension (n = 11/43), and hyperlipidemia (=10/43). At inclusion, 42% (n = 18) had chronic kidney disease ≥ grade 3a. All patients were switched from IV HBIG with or without NAs to SC HBIG without NAs. After one year, the targeted titer was lowered to ≥150 IU/l in patients with low risk of recurrence. Mean follow-up time was 36 ± 5 months. None of the patients had a relapse of HBsAg or HBV DNA. The treatment was well tolerated, safe and the renal function remained unchanged both in patients with (n = 18) or without (n = 25) renal impairment at baseline. The mean HBsAb titer could be decreased from 343 ± 163 to 199 ± 81 IU/l in the low-risk group (n = 17) and 218 ± 71 IU/l in the high-risk group (n = 26). In 86% (n = 37) doses, reductions were possible, which significantly lowered the cost of treatment. SC HBIG without NAs had a 100% success rate in the long-term prevention of HBsAg and HBV DNA reappearance, without deterioration of renal function.

The optimal choice of medication administration route regarding intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous injection

BACKGROUND

Intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), and subcutaneous (SC) are the three most frequently used injection routes in medication administration. Comparative studies of SC versus IV, IM versus IV, or IM versus SC have been sporadically conducted, and some new findings are completely different from the dosage recommendation as described in prescribing information. However, clinicians may still be ignorant of such new evidence-based findings when choosing treatment methods.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Sciences™ Core Collection to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of SC, IV, and IM administration in head-to-head comparative studies.

RESULTS

"SC better than IV" involves trastuzumab, rituximab, antitumor necrosis factor medications, bortezomib, amifostine, recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, recombinant interleukin-2, immunoglobulin, epoetin alfa, heparin, and opioids. "IV better than SC" involves ketamine, vitamin K1, and abatacept. With respect to insulin and ketamine, whether IV has advantages over SC is determined by specific clinical circumstances. "IM better than IV" involves epinephrine, hepatitis B immu-noglobulin, pegaspargase, and some antibiotics. "IV better than IM" involves ketamine, morphine, and antivenom. "IM better than SC" involves epinephrine. "SC better than IM" involves interferon-beta-1a, methotrexate, human chorionic gonadotropin, hepatitis B immunoglobulin, hydrocortisone, and morphine. Safety, efficacy, patient preference, and pharmacoeconomics are four principles governing the choice of injection route. Safety and efficacy must be the preferred principles to be considered (eg, epinephrine should be given intramuscularly during an episode of systemic anaphylaxis). If the safety and efficacy of two injection routes are equivalent, clinicians should consider more about patient preference and pharmacoeconomics because patient preference will ensure optimal treatment adherence and ultimately improve patient experience or satisfaction, while pharmacoeconomic concern will help alleviate nurse shortages and reduce overall health care costs. Besides the principles, the following detailed factors might affect the decision: patient characteristics-related factors (body mass index, age, sex, medical status [eg, renal impairment, comorbidities], personal attitudes toward safety and convenience, past experience, perception of current disease status, health literacy, and socioeconomic status), medication administration-related factors (anatomical site of injection, dose, frequency, formulation characteristics, administration time, indication, flexibility in the route of administration), and health care staff/institution-related factors (knowledge, human resources).

CONCLUSION

This updated review of findings of comparative studies of different injection routes will enrich the knowledge of safe, efficacious, economic, and patient preference-oriented medication administration as well as catching research opportunities in clinical nursing practice.

Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous hepatitis B immunoglobulin after liver transplantation: an open single-arm prospective study

Life-long hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) administration is a main component of prophylactic strategy to prevent hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation (LT). Long-term effects of HBIG treatment are known only for intravenous (IV) and intramuscular formulations. To evaluate safety and efficacy of self-administered SC HBIG, 135 LT patients receiving a 48-week treatment were analyzed. The dose of HBIG was 500 IU or 1000 IU if body weight was <75 kg or ≥75 kg, respectively. Patients were switched from the monthly IV HBIG treatment to weekly SC HBIG 2-3 weeks after the last IV dosage. All patients were able to SC self-injection after a single training. The treatment was effective in maintaining trough anti-HBs levels >100 IU/L. No severe drug-related side effects occurred. Fifteen injection-site small hematomas and four cases of mild itch occurred. At the end of the study, anti-HBs median titer was 232 IU/L (115-566 IU/L) and 97.8% of patients had an anti-HBs level >150 IU/L. Due to high mean level of anti-HBs titers observed during this study, individualized treatment schedules should be further investigated. In conclusion, SC HBIG for long-term prophylaxis of post-LT HBV reinfection resulted safe, well accepted, and effective in maintaining adequate anti-HBs levels.

Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous human HBV-immunoglobulin (Zutectra) in liver transplantation: an open, prospective, single-arm phase III study

Hepatitis B re-infection prophylaxis is crucial for graft and recipient survival for transplanted patients and is administered routinely after liver transplantation for hepatitis B. Aim of the current study was the investigation of efficacy, safety and feasibility of home-treatment of a novel human hepatitis B immunoglobulin BT088 (Zutectra) after weekly subcutaneous application in liver-transplanted patients. A total of 23 patients (5 female, 18 male, median age 51 years) were enrolled and switched from monthly IV to weekly SC hepatitis B immunoglobulin administration. During a period of 18 weeks (optional 24 weeks) anti-HBs levels, signs of re-infection, adverse events and feasibility of self-administration were studied. After 8 weeks of training patients showing good compliance and stable antibody titres were allowed to start self-administration at home. All patients maintained a safety level of >100 U/l anti-HBs. No failure was noted, no re-infection occurred. A total of 10 treatment-emergent events were assessed as related to study drug application (injection-site haematoma, headache, abdominal pain, fatigue and haematuria). High numbers of self-administration (287 vs. 122 by staff) demonstrated general feasibility of SC administration. Weekly subcutaneous administration of BT088 (Zutectra - registered trade mark in the EU) is effective, safe and presents an easy-to-apply treatment option for combined hepatitis B virus re-infection prophylaxis in liver transplant patients (Eudra CT Number: 2005-003737-40).