Trend in SSRI-SNRI antidepressants prescription over a 6-year period and predictors of poor adherence

Analysis of therapeutic adherence to antidepressants and associated factors in patients with depressive disorder: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Non-adherence to antidepressants is a common problem that can significantly impact health outcomes in patients with depressive disorders. The aim of this study was to assess antidepressant adherence rates and identify factors associated with non-adherence in a population-based cohort of patients with depressive disorders, using real-world data.

METHODS

This retrospective, population-based cohort study used real-world data from patients diagnosed with depression in the Canary Islands, Spain, between 2013 and 2021. Adherence to antidepressants was assessed using the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) over a 12-month follow-up period. Patients were classified as adherent if they had an MPR ≥ 0.8. To assess the association with sociodemographic, clinical, and lifestyle variables, multivariate logistic regression models were performed.

RESULTS

Among the 39,800 patients included, the overall adherence rate to antidepressants was 31.02 %. Older age, female sex, and the presence of multiple comorbidities were significantly associated with higher adherence rates. In contrast, alcohol, and tobacco use, as well as inadequate nutrition, were significantly linked with lower adherence.

CONCLUSION

Non-adherence to antidepressants is a highly prevalent problem in patients with depressive disorders. The findings of this study highlight the importance of identifying factors that influence adherence and developing specific interventions to improve treatment outcomes in this population.

Serotonergic antidepressants are associated with increased acute bleeding events following femur fracture fixation: A nationwide matched cohort analysis of 5,477 patients

INTRODUCTION

Serotonergic antidepressants, including both selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) have been linked to adverse outcomes following orthopedic procedures. This study aims to evaluate the impact of SSRIs/SNRIs on outcomes in patients following operative fixation of the femur. We hypothesized that perioperative use of SSRIs would be associated with worse outcomes post-surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the TriNetX global federated research network. Adult patients (>18 years) with femur fractures treated surgically were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) codes. Propensity score matching was performed to create two cohorts: patients using SSRIs/SNRIs and non-users, each consisting of 5,477 matched patients. Outcomes assessed included postoperative bleeding complications, intensive care unit (ICU) requirement, and wound dehiscence.

RESULTS

On the day of surgery, there were no differences in rates of acute post-hemorrhagic anemia (12 % vs 12 %, p = 0.86), hemoglobin <7g/dL (6 % vs 6 %, p = 0.97) or transfusion (4.9 % vs 4.4 %, p = 0.24). From postoperative day 1-7, rates of acute post-hemorrhagic anemia (18 % vs 16 %, p < 0.01), hemoglobin < 7 g/dL (29 % vs 24 %, p < 0.01) and transfusion (9.5 % vs 8.0 %, p < 0.01) were significantly higher in the SSRI/SNRI cohort. From postoperative day 7-30, there were no observed differences in rates for acute post-hemorrhagic anemia, hemoglobin <7g/dL, transfusion and hematoma incision and drainage.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative use of SSRIs/SNRIs in patients with femur fractures is associated with increased risk of acute bleeding complications (Day 1-7); however, the increased risk of bleeding complications is not observed beyond one week postoperatively. Balancing surgical risk with mental health needs is crucial. These findings underscore the importance of careful management of patients with SSRIs/SNRIs undergoing orthopedic procedures, particularly in terms of postoperative blood loss anemia and the need for transfusion.

Serotonergic Antidepressants Are Associated With Higher Rates of Hematoma After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Large Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Large database propensity-matched retrospective cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the potential effects of serotonergic antidepressants on outcomes after anterior cervical spine surgery. It was hypothesized that the perioperative use of serotonergic antidepressants would be associated with higher rates of hematoma formation and worse outcomes after anterior cervical spine surgery.

BACKGROUND

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) have been associated with worse outcomes after orthopedic procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using TriNetX, an aggregated and de-identified electronic health record platform. Patients who underwent anterior cervical surgery were included through Current Procedural Terminology codes and the International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision, encounter diagnosis codes. Cohorts were 1:1 propensity-matched across 7 demographic and medical comorbidity parameters, and outcomes were compared. The incidence of adverse outcomes, as well as health care utilization, within 14 days, 30 days, 90 days, and 2 years postoperatively was evaluated.

RESULTS

Following propensity matching, each cohort consisted of 9249 patients, for a total of 18,498 patients included in the final statistical analysis. SSRIs/SNRIs were associated with higher odds of hematoma formation within 7 days [0.69% vs . 0.46%, odds ratio (OR): 1.5 (95% CI: 1.02-2.2), P = 0.04] and within 14 days postoperatively [0.81% vs . 0.52%, OR: 1.6 (95% CI: 1.1-2.3), P = 0.01]. Within 30 and 90 days, SSRIs/SNRIs were associated with a higher risk of emergency department utilization [30 d, OR: 1.30 (1.1-1.4); 90 d, OR: 1.3 (1.2-1.4)] and irrigation & debridement (I&D; 30 d, OR: 1.9 (1.2-3.0)]. SSRIs/SNRIs were also associated with a significantly higher risk of I&D within 2 years [OR: 1.3 (1.1-1.6)].

CONCLUSION

The use of serotonergic antidepressants perioperatively was associated with higher odds and risk of numerous outcomes, including hematoma formation, emergency department utilization, and the need for irrigation and debridement. Future prospective studies are required to confirm these results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective cohort analysis.

International Trends in Antidepressant Consumption: a 10-year Comparative Analysis (2010-2020)

The present study aims to analyze country-specific antidepressant consumption rates across 30 OECD countries, comparing them with the OECD average from 2010 to 2020. This analysis examines annual variations in consumption and identifies potential trends over time. Using a retrospective observational design, the study employs pooled secondary data from 30 OECD countries. A time trend analysis was conducted to assess overall and country-specific linear and quadratic trends, modeling the variation in Defined Daily Dose (DDD) per 1,000 inhabitants from 2010 to 2020. Findings reveal a significant increase in antidepressant consumption across most countries. The mean DDD value rose from 52.42 in 2010 to 69.5 in 2020. Three distinct trend patterns emerged: linear, concave, and convex. While 15 countries exhibited a significant linear increase, five showed a plateauing trend, and others experienced exponential growth with a convex trajectory. Denmark was the only country to show a decline in consumption, whereas Norway displayed no significant change over time. These results underscore a notable rise in antidepressant use across most OECD countries, alongside variations in consumption trajectories. By assessing and comparing national consumption rates, this study highlights the importance of international collaboration in addressing mental health challenges and optimizing healthcare accessibility and outcomes.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and quality of life: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials

The benefit of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in improving quality of life (QoL) has been investigated in randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) with equivocal results. This study explored whether SSRIs could improve QoL in individuals with medical, psychiatric, and neuropsychiatric conditions. RCTs were searched in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Ovid, and Google Scholar. Data were synthesized via a meta-analysis. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed. The sample size was 9,070. Compared with placebo, SSRIs showed statistically significant improvements in QoL in cancer (d = 0.30), major depressive disorder (d = 0.27), premenstrual dysphoric disorder (d = 0.38), type 2 diabetes mellitus (d = 0.48), persistent depressive disorder (d = 0.32), and menopausal symptoms (d = 0.40). Paroxetine exhibited the highest effect size. No significant improvements were noted in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (d = 0.65, P = 0.09), congestive heart failure (d = 0.46, P = 0.27), and irritable bowel syndrome (d = 0.26, P = 0.127). The reduction in depressive symptoms improved QoL. Small-study effects, high attrition rates, and demographic imbalances are limiting factors to recommend SSRIs to improve QoL. Future research should focus on QoL domains and pharmacological properties of each SSRI.

Efficacy and safety of zuranolone for the treatment of depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Major depressive disorder (MDD) and postpartum depression (PPD) are common and burdensome conditions. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zuranolone, a neuroactive steroid γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors-positive allosteric modulator, in treating MDD and PPD. A comprehensive literature search was conducted until September 2023, identifying seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The results demonstrated that zuranolone significantly decreased Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) scores in patients with PPD or MDD at day 15 (concluding the 14-day course) and day 42-45 (4 weeks after treatment cessation) compared with the placebo, albeit exhibiting a diminishing trend. Moreover, a higher percentage of patients with PPD or MDD achieved HAM-D response and remission with zuranolone treatment compared with placebo at day 15. However, zuranolone did not significantly increase the proportion of MDD patients achieving HAM-D remission at 42/43 days. Adverse events (AEs) such as somnolence, dizziness, and sedation were linked to zuranolone, with a higher but not statistically significant rate of discontinuation due to AEs in the zuranolone group. Overall, our findings support the rapid antidepressant effects of zuranolone in MDD and PPD, along with a relatively favorable safety and tolerability. Large-scale longitudinal RCTs are needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of zuranolone.

Efficacy and safety of zuranolone in Japanese adults with major depressive disorder: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 clinical trial

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an oral, once-daily, 14-day treatment course of zuranolone in Japanese patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomized eligible patients (1:1:1) to receive oral zuranolone 20 mg, zuranolone 30 mg, or placebo once daily for 14 days (treatment-period), followed by two 6-week follow-up periods. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) total score on Day 15.

RESULTS

Overall, 250 patients (enrolled: 07/07/2020-05/26/2021) were randomized to receive placebo (n = 83), zuranolone 20 mg (n = 85), or zuranolone 30 mg (n = 82). The demographic and baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. The adjusted mean (standard error) change from baseline in the HAMD-17 total score on Day 15 was -6.22 (0.62), -8.14 (0.62), and - 8.31 (0.63) in the placebo, zuranolone 20-mg, and zuranolone 30-mg groups, respectively. Significant differences in the adjusted mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) for zuranolone 20 mg versus placebo (-1.92; [-3.65, -0.19]; P = 0.0296) and zuranolone 30 mg versus placebo (-2.09; [-3.83, -0.35]; P = 0.0190) groups were observed on Day 15, and also as early as Day 3. A nonsignificant yet distinct drug-placebo separation was observed during follow-up. Somnolence (placebo [3.7%], zuranolone 20 mg [10.6%], and zuranolone 30 mg [20.7%]) and dizziness (3.7%, 9.4%, and 9.8%, respectively) were more common with zuranolone.

CONCLUSION

Oral zuranolone was safe and demonstrated significant improvements in depressive symptoms, as assessed by HAMD-17 total score change from baseline over 14 days in Japanese patients with MDD.

Antidepressant Prescription for Major Depressive Disorder: Results from a Population-Based Study in Italy

OBJECTIVES

There is limited evidence about the factors influencing antidepressant (AD) prescription for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in Real World clinical practice in Italy. In this retrospective, population-based study, we set out to describe a patient cohort initiated on AD treatment for MDD and investigate the possible predictors of different AD prescriptions in the primary care setting.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of MDD who received an initial prescription of one of 11 selected ADs between 1-Apr-2017 and 31-Mar-2019 (index date) were identified from primary care electronic medical records in the Longitudinal Patient Database. Patients prescribed ≥1 AD in the 12 months before the index date were excluded. Results were stratified by AD molecule. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated the association between patients' demographic, clinical factors, and choice of AD molecule.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 8,823 patients (67.1% female; mean age 61.6 years). Previous AD treatments (prescribed in the 10 years before the index date) had been received by 46.6% of patients (non-naïve patients). The most commonly reported psychiatric and medical comorbidities reported in the 12 months before the index date were anxiety (8.4%) and hypertension (41.9%), respectively. Patients' age was a significant predictor of AD molecule prescribed at index date in eight of the 11 molecules investigated, while patients' gender influenced clinician prescribing bupropion, citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, sertraline, and vortioxetine.

CONCLUSION

Results from this Real World study provide useful information for clinicians on the clinical factors influencing AD prescription in patients treated for MDD in primary care.

Global prevalence of antidepressant drug utilization in the community: protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Antidepressant drugs are the most frequently prescribed medication for mental disorders. They are also used off-label and for non-psychiatric indications. Prescriptions of antidepressants have increased in the last decades, but no systematic review exists on the extent of their use in the community.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a systematic review to estimate the prevalence of antidepressant use in the community. We will search for studies published from 1 January 2010 in the Embase and MEDLINE databases using a combination of controlled vocabulary and keywords adjusted for each database without any language restriction. The main inclusion criterion is the presence of prevalence data of antidepressant utilization. Thus, we will include all studies with a descriptive observational design reporting the prevalence of antidepressant use in the community. Study selection (by title/abstract and full-text screening) and data extraction for included studies will be independently conducted by pairs of reviewers. We will then synthesize the data on the prevalence of antidepressant use in individuals living in the community. If possible, we will perform a meta-analysis to generate prevalence-pooled estimates. If the data allows it, we will conduct subgroup analyses by antidepressant class, age, sex, country and other sociodemographic categories. We will evaluate the risk of bias for each included study through a quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool: Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data. DistillerSR software will be used for the management of this review.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required for this review as it will not directly involve human or animal subjects. The findings of our systematic review will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals, the Qualaxia Network (https://qualaxia.org), presentations at international conferences on mental health and pharmacoepidemiology, as well as general public events.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021247423.

A Focus on Abuse/Misuse and Withdrawal Issues with Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs): Analysis of Both the European EMA and the US FAERS Pharmacovigilance Databases

Despite increasing reports, antidepressant (AD) misuse and dependence remain underestimated issues, possibly due to limited epidemiological and pharmacovigilance evidence. Thus, here we aimed to determine available pharmacovigilance misuse/abuse/dependence/withdrawal signals relating to the Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI) citalopram, escitalopram, paroxetine, fluoxetine, and sertraline. Both EudraVigilance (EV) and Food and Drug Administration-FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) datasets were analysed to identify AD misuse/abuse/dependence/withdrawal issues. A descriptive analysis was performed; moreover, pharmacovigilance measures, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the information component (IC), and the empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM) were calculated. Both datasets showed increasing trends of yearly reporting and similar signals regarding abuse and dependence. From the EV, a total of 5335 individual ADR reports were analysed, of which 30% corresponded to paroxetine (n = 1592), 27% citalopram (n = 1419), 22% sertraline (n = 1149), 14% fluoxetine (n = 771), and 8% escitalopram (n = 404). From FAERS, a total of 144,395 individual ADR reports were analysed, of which 27% were related to paroxetine, 27% sertraline, 18% citalopram, 16% fluoxetine, and 13% escitalopram. Comparing SSRIs, the EV misuse/abuse-related ADRs were mostly recorded for citalopram, fluoxetine, and sertraline; conversely, dependence was mostly associated with paroxetine, and withdrawal to escitalopram. Similarly, in the FAERS dataset, dependence/withdrawal-related signals were more frequently reported for paroxetine. Although SSRIs are considered non-addictive pharmacological agents, a range of proper withdrawal symptoms can occur well after discontinuation, especially with paroxetine. Prescribers should be aware of the potential for dependence and withdrawal associated with SSRIs.

Changes After Emergency Assessment of Suicidal Patients: An Unexpected Outcome

INTRODUCTION

Acute Suicide Risk (ASR) is widely evaluated at Emergency Departments (ED). Little is known about follow-up of ASR after psychiatric ED evaluation, and if there are differences within No ASR (NASR) counterparts at baseline and afterwards.

METHOD

We developed a naturalistic, 3-month follow-up study of adult patients from a psychiatric ED in Mexico City. Depressive patients who asked voluntarily for an emergency consultation from July 1 to December 1, 2014, were included. We compared depression severity, suicidal ideation, adherence to treatment, and perceived social support scales both in ASR and NASR participants at baseline and follow-up interviews.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 120) were divided into ASR or NASR groups (n = 60 each). The ASR group obtained more negative scores in all scales at baseline evaluation. After three months, 85% (n = 51) of ASR and 75% (n = 45) of NASR completed the second interview. 5.21% (n = 3) of participants showed new suicidal behavior. At follow-up, the ASR group showed a higher relative response in depression scales and treatment adherence (p = 0.036), and lower scores in suicidal ideation scales than NASR group (p = 0.012). Perceived support from family was significantly higher in the NASR group (p = 0.016).

DISCUSSION

These relative higher responses in clinical scales suggest a paradoxical advantage of ASR over NASR patients, suggesting a hypothetical phenomenon similar to "The Tortoise and the Hare" effect. However, it is not applicable for all ASR patients. Results suggest suicidal patients experience stigma from their families. Further research and public health programs for ASR at ED should be implemented.

Off-label Uses of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs)

Psychiatric drugs have primacy for off-label prescribing. Among those, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are highly versatile and, therefore, widely prescribed. Moreover, they are commonly considered as having a better safety profile compared to other antidepressants. Thus, when it comes to off-label prescribing, SSRIs rank among the top positions. In this review, we present the state of the art of off-label applications of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, ranging from migraine prophylaxis to SARS-CoV-2 antiviral properties. Research on SSRIs provided significant evidence in the treatment of premature ejaculation, both with the on-label dapoxetine 30 mg and the off-label paroxetine 20 mg. However, other than a serotoninergic syndrome, serious conditions like increased bleeding rates, hyponatremia, hepatoxicity, and post-SSRIs sexual dysfunctions, are consistently more prominent when using such compounds. These insidious side effects might be frequently underestimated during common clinical practice, especially by nonpsychiatrists. Thus, some points must be addressed when using SSRIs. Among these, a psychiatric evaluation before every administration that falls outside the regulatory agencies-approved guidelines has to be considered mandatory. For these reasons, we aim with the present article to identify the risks of inappropriate uses and to advocate the need to actively boost research encouraging future clinical trials on this topic.

Methylphenidate augmentation of escitalopram to enhance adherence to antidepressant treatment: a pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Adherence to treatment, i.e. the extent to which a patient's therapeutic engagement coincides with the prescribed treatment, is among the most important problems in mental health care. The current study investigated the influence of pairing an acute positive reinforcing dopaminergic/noradrenergic effect (methylphenidate, MPH) with a standard antidepressant on the rates of adherence to medication treatment. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether MPH + escitalopram resulted in higher rates of medication adherence relative to placebo + escitalopram.

METHODS

Twenty participants with moderate to severe depression were 1-1 randomized to either (1) 5 mg MPH + 10 mg escitalopram or (2) placebo + 10 mg escitalopram with the possibility for a dose increase at 4 weeks. A Bayesian analysis was conducted to evaluate the outcomes.

RESULTS

First, neither percent Pill count nor Medication Electronic Monitoring System adherence showed that MPH was superior to placebo. In fact, placebo showed slightly higher adherence rates on the primary (7.82% better than MPH) and secondary (7.07% better than MPH) outcomes. There was a less than 25% chance of MPH augmentation showing at least as good or better adherence than placebo. Second, both groups showed a significant effect of treatment on the QIDS-SR with a median effect of an 8.6-point score reduction. Third, neither subjective measures of adherence attitudes nor socio-demographic covariates had a significant influence on the primary or secondary outcome variables.

CONCLUSIONS

These data do not support the use of MPH to increase adherence to antidepressant medication in individuals with moderate to severe depression. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03388164 , registered on 01/02/2018.

Duloxetine versus 'active' placebo, placebo or no intervention for major depressive disorder; a protocol for a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Major depression significantly impairs quality of life, increases the risk of suicide, and poses tremendous economic burden on individuals and societies. Duloxetine, a serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is a widely prescribed antidepressant. The effects of duloxetine have, however, not been sufficiently assessed in earlier systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

METHODS/DESIGN

A systematic review will be performed including randomised clinical trials comparing duloxetine with 'active' placebo, placebo or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder. Bias domains will be assessed, an eight-step procedure will be used to assess if the thresholds for clinical significance are crossed. We will conduct meta-analyses. Trial sequential analysis will be conducted to control random errors, and the certainty of the evidence will be assessed using GRADE. To identify relevant trials, we will search Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica database, PsycINFO, Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Social Science & Humanities. We will also search Chinese databases and Google Scholar. We will search all databases from their inception to the present. Two review authors will independently extract data and perform risk of bias assessment. Primary outcomes will be the difference in mean depression scores on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale between the intervention and control groups and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes will be suicide, suicide-attempts, suicidal ideation, quality of life and non-serious adverse events.

DISCUSSION

No former systematic review has systematically assessed the beneficial and harmful effects of duloxetine taking into account both the risks of random errors and the risks of systematic errors. Our review will help clinicians weigh the benefits of prescribing duloxetine against its adverse effects and make informed decisions.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO 2016 CRD42016053931.

Creation and validation of a semi-quantitative instrument to assess the confidence of pharmacists in medication consultation for patients with depression: The pharmacists' confidence scale about medication consultation for depressive patients (PCMCD)

Objectives

To develop a semi-quantitative instrument to assess pharmacists' confidence in medication counseling for patients with depression, The Pharmacists' Confidence scale about Medication Consultation for Depressive patients (PCMCD), and investigated its validity.

Methods

Following discussions with practicing pharmacists, we developed a 12-item questionnaire to assess pharmacists' confidence in medication counseling for patients with depression. We launched web-based cross-sectional survey during November and December 2018 to 77 pharmacists employed at drug chain stores in Kansai area. Factor analysis was performed to evaluate the configuration concept validity. The least-squares method was used for factor extraction, and the resulting factors were subjected to direct oblimin rotation, with a factor loading cut-off of 0.4. To assess internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha values were calculated for each of the extracted factors (subscales). A multiple regression analysis was performed using simultaneous forced entry, with the scores obtained for each subscale as dependent variables and responder attributes as independent variables in order to investigate the factors associated with each subscale.

Results

During the factor analysis procedure, four questions were excluded by the cut-off rule. Eventually, a model with three subscales was identified, with a cumulative sum of squared loadings being 61.9%. The subscales were termed "relationship building," "comprehension of condition," and "information provision" based on the nature of the questions relevant for each of them. The Cronbach's alpha values for these subscales were 0.92, 0.73, and 0.72, respectively. The average inter-item correlation was 0.378. In addition, multiple regression analysis revealed that there were significant correlations between pharmacist career and both relationship building and information provision.

Conclusions

The PCMCD model demonstrated a satisfactory construct validity and internal consistency. This model will provide an excellent tool for assessing pharmacists' confidence in depression care.

Prevalence and Determinants of Long-Term Utilization of Antidepressant Drugs: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Antidepressant consumption has risen in recent years, driven by longer treatment duration. The objective of this study was to measure the prevalence of antidepressant long-term and chronic use in the Bologna area, Italy, and to identify their main determinants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective claims-based cohort study by using the Bologna Local Health Authority data. A cohort of 18,307 incident users of antidepressant drugs in 2013 was selected, and subjects were followed for three years. A long-term utilization was defined as having at least one prescription claimed during each year of follow-up, while chronic utilization was defined as claiming at least 180 defined daily doses per year. Factors associated with chronic and long-term use were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regressions.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 5448 (29.8%) and 1817 (9.9%) subjects were dispensed antidepressants for a long-term course and in a chronically way, respectively. Older age, antidepressant polytherapy, polypharmacy, and being prescribed the first antidepressant by a hospital physician were all factors independently associated with chronic and long-term prescriptions of antidepressant drugs. Results were reported separately for men and women.

CONCLUSION

Antidepressant long-term and chronic prescriptions are common in the Bologna area. Because longer treatment should be clinically motivated, these results strongly prompt the need to evaluate the actual relevance, as they may indicate potentially inappropriate prescription patterns.

Antidepressant use in Denmark, Germany, Spain, and Sweden between 2009 and 2014: Incidence and comorbidities of antidepressant initiators

BACKGROUND

We aimed to describe patterns of use and characteristics of 10 commonly used antidepressants for the period 2009-2014 in Denmark, Germany, Spain, and Sweden.

METHODS

Adult initiators from 2009 to 2014 of each study antidepressant were identified in four countries using five data sources: the Danish National registers, GePaRD (Germany), EpiChron (Aragon, Spain), SIDIAP (Catalonia, Spain), and the Swedish National Registers. The study included 10 study antidepressants: citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, duloxetine, venlafaxine, amitriptyline, mirtazapine, and agomelatine.

RESULTS

Citalopram was the most prescribed study antidepressant, followed by mirtazapine. Paroxetine and agomelatine were the least prescribed antidepressants. Mirtazapine was widely used among older antidepressant initiators with higher percentages of comorbidities at baseline, and fluoxetine was used among young patients. Citalopram and amitriptyline had the lowest percentage of multiple antidepressant use in the 12 months prior to the current treatment episode, while agomelatine, duloxetine, and venlafaxine had the highest percentage of multiple antidepressant use in the year prior to the current treatment episode.

LIMITATIONS

The most important limitations are exposure information based on filled prescriptions, focus on antidepressant initiators only, lack of information on the indication, and heterogeneity of the type of data across data sources.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study including 4.8 million study antidepressant initiators of study antidepressants suggest that citalopram and mirtazapine are the most commonly prescribed antidepressants. Agomelatine and paroxetine were the least used antidepressants in the participating populations. Mirtazapine was the antidepressant most commonly prescribed among older antidepressant initiators with high percentage of comorbidities at baseline, whereas fluoxetine was commonly used among young patients.

Venlafaxine Improves the Cognitive Impairment and Depression-Like Behaviors in a Cuprizone Mouse Model by Alleviating Demyelination and Neuroinflammation in the Brain

Growing evidence has implicated that myelin deficits and neuroinflammation are the coexisted pathological features that contribute to the mood swing and cognitive decline in major depressive disorder (MDD) and multiple sclerosis (MS). Therefore, attenuation of neuroinflammation and reduction of demyelination became newly emerging treatment strategies for the mood and cognitive symptoms. Antidepressant venlafaxine has been used in depression and anxiety through its multiple neuroprotective effects. However, it is unclear whether venlafaxine can improve myelin integrity and alter inflammation status in the brain. By using a well-established cuprizone-induced acute mouse model of demyelination, we investigated the protective effects of venlafaxine on these facets. The cuprizone-fed animals exhibited cognitive impairment and mood disturbances together with myelin loss and prominent neuroinflammation in the brain. Our present study showed that a high dose of venlafaxine alleviated the loss of myelin and oligodendrocytes (OLs), mitigated depression-like behaviors, and improved cognitive function in cuprizone-fed animals. Data from the present study also showed that venlafaxine reduced microglia-mediated inflammation in the brains of cuprizone-fed animals. These findings suggest that venlafaxine may exert its therapeutic effects via facilitating myelin integrity and controlling neuroinflammation, which may provide extra benefits to MS patients with depression and anxiety beyond the symptom management.

The anti-inflammatory mechanism of antidepressants - SSRIs, SNRIs

The cytokine theory of depression no longer brings about any doubts. Experiments and research studies conducted in the last ten years have confirmed that both physical and psychological (emotional) stress increases the likelihood of occurrence of mental disorders (including depressive disorders) owing to the action of a series of hormonal and biochemical mechanisms. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) as well as serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are some of the most commonly applied drugs in the world during pharmacotherapy of recurrent depressive disorder. The underestimated anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effect may be one of the potential mechanisms of action of the preparations mentioned above. The detailed specificity of action of this mechanism still remains unknown. The aim of our work will be to perform a review of contemporary literature in order to present the latest scientific reports regarding the anti-inflammatory effects of SSRIs and SNRIs. The mechanism of anti-inflammatory action may serve as a possible explanation for the efficacy of antidepressants from the groups of SSRIs and SNRIs.

Antidepressant use in suicides: a case-control study from the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region, Italy, 2005-2014

PURPOSE

To compare the use of antidepressant (AD) classes and compounds in individuals who committed suicide and in controls from the general population and to assess to what extent adherence and current use of different AD classes can affect the risk of committing suicide.

METHODS

Individual data on suicide, diagnoses and AD use in Friuli Venezia Giulia from 2005 to 2014 were obtained from the Regional Social and Health Information System. All suicides that had at least one prescription of AD in the 730 days before death (N = 876) were included as cases. Each case was matched with regard to age and sex with five controls from the general population. The association between suicide and AD use was assessed using conditional logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Almost 70% of all suicides occurring in the10-year period had been prescribed AD. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) accounted for more than the 90% of the prescriptions, with paroxetine the most prescribed AD. All AD compounds and classes were not associated with a higher suicide risk, with the exception of SSRI (OR = 1.6). A decreasing trend in suicide risk was observed when adherent subjects or current AD users were compared to the others.

CONCLUSIONS

AD treatment is an important factor for preventing suicide, since the use of AD at adequate dosage and for a proper duration was associated with a lower suicide risk. The proper use of AD should be ascertained by physicians, particularly in a primary care context.

Antidepressant adherence patterns in older patients: use of a clustering method on a prescription database

According to the World Health Organization, depression will become the second most important cause of disability worldwide by 2020. Our objective was to identify patterns of adherence to antidepressant treatments in older patients using several indicators of adherence and to characterize these patterns in terms of medication exposure. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the French National Health Insurance reimbursement database. Incident antidepressant users aged more than 65 were included from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2011, and followed up for 18 months. Antidepressant and other psychotropic drugs (opioids, benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, anti-epileptics) were recorded. Adherence to antidepressant treatment was assessed by several measures including proportion of days covered, discontinuation periods, persistence of treatment, and doses dispensed. Patients were classified according to their adherence patterns using a mixed clustering method. We identified five groups according to antidepressant adherence. One group (n = 7505, 26.9%) was fully adherent with regard to guidelines on antidepressant use. Two patterns of nonadherent users were identified: irregular but persistent users (n = 5131, 18.4%) and regular but nonpersistent users (n = 9037, 32.4%). Serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the most frequently dispensed antidepressant class (70.6%), followed by other antidepressants (43.3%, mainly serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and tianeptine) and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) (13.4%). Nonadherent users more frequently had a dispensing of TCA, opioid, and anti-epileptic medication than adherent users. Health policies to improve adherence to antidepressant treatment may require better training of physicians and pharmacists, insisting on the important role of the continuation period of antidepressant treatment.

ANTIDEPRESSANT ADHERENCE ACROSS DIVERSE POPULATIONS AND HEALTHCARE SETTINGS

BACKGROUND

Early adherence is key to successful depression treatment, but nearly 60% of patients discontinue antidepressants within 3 months. Our study aimed to determine factors associated with poor early adherence to antidepressants in a large diverse sample of patients.

METHODS

Six Mental Health Research Network healthcare systems contributed data for adults with depression and a new antidepressant start, defined by a washout period of at least 270 days, between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2012. Pharmacy fill and self-reported race/ethnicity data were obtained from the electronic medical record. Patients had early adherence if they had a second antidepressant fill within 180 days of the first. We used logistic regression to investigate the relationship between early adherence and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 177,469 adult patients had 184,967 new episodes of depression with a filled antidepressant prescription. Patients refilled their antidepressants within 180 days in 71% of episodes. Race/ethnicity was a strong predictor of early adherence, with patients from racial/ethnic minorities other than Native Americans/Alaskan Natives less likely (adjusted odd ratios 0.50-0.59) to refill their antidepressants than non-Hispanic whites. Age, neighborhood education, comorbidity burden, provider type and engagement in psychotherapy were also associated with adherence. Other apparent predictors of early adherence, including neighborhood income, gender, and prior mental health hospitalizations, were no longer significant in the fully adjusted model.

CONCLUSIONS

Race/ethnicity was a robust predictor of early antidepressant adherence, with minority groups other than Native Americans/Alaskan Natives less likely to be adherent. Further research is needed to determine whether early nonadherence in specific minority populations is intentional, due to side effects or patient preference, or unintentional and appropriate for targeted interventions to improve adherence.

Times to Discontinue Antidepressants Over 6 Months in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to investigate differences in discontinuation time among antidepressants and total antidepressant discontinuation rate of patients with depression over a 6 month period in a naturalistic treatment setting.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 900 patients with major depressive disorder who were initially prescribed only one kind of antidepressant. The prescribed antidepressants and the reasons for discontinuation were surveyed at baseline and every 4 weeks during the 24 week study. We investigated the discontinuation rate and the mean time to discontinuation among six antidepressants groups.

RESULTS

Mean and median overall discontinuation times were 13.8 and 12 weeks, respectively. Sertraline and escitalopram had longer discontinuation times than that of fluoxetine, and patients who used sertraline discontinued use significantly later than those taking mirtazapine. No differences in discontinuation rate were observed after 24 weeks among these antidepressants. About 73% of patients discontinued antidepressant treatment after 24 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Sertraline and escitalopram tended to have longer mean times to discontinuation, although no difference in discontinuation rate was detected between antidepressants after 24 weeks. About three-quarters of patients discontinued antidepressant maintenance therapy after 24 weeks.

Persistent analgesic use and the association with chronic pain and other risk factors in the population-a longitudinal study from the Tromsø Study and the Norwegian Prescription Database

PURPOSE

Analgesics are commonly used drugs. The long-term effectiveness is mostly unproven, while the risk of several serious adverse effects is well established. We aimed to estimate the prevalence and incidence of persistent analgesic use and the association with chronic pain and sociodemographic and comorbid risk factors.

METHODS

The Tromsø Study is an epidemiological, prospective study of health and diseases. We linked the sixth wave (Tromsø 6, 2007-08, n = 12,981) with the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD, 2004-13). Persistent analgesic use was defined as the use of analgesics, i.e., either non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids or paracetamol, for ≥90 days with proportion-of-days-covered ≥40 %. The study design provided both cross-sectional and longitudinal data; a cohort of 11,905 persons was followed for 4.5 years.

RESULTS

The prevalence of persistent analgesic use was 4 % in general and 10 % among those reporting chronic pain. The incidence rate of persistent analgesic use was 21 per 1000 person-years in general. Baseline chronic pain doubled the risk of incident persistent analgesic use (HR = 2.05, 95 % CI 1.80-2.33). The risk increased with increasing chronic pain severity, as measured by chronic pain duration, frequency, intensity, and number of body locations. Sociodemographic risk factors were older age, female sex, lower education, and most likely lower physical activity. Psychological distress was not a statistical significant risk factor.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed a relatively low prevalence of persistent analgesic use and that the majority of persons reporting chronic pain do not use analgesics persistently.

Linking Annual Prescription Volume of Antidepressants to Corresponding Web Search Query Data: A Possible Proxy for Medical Prescription Behavior?

Persons using the Internet to retrieve medical information generate large amounts of health-related data, which are increasingly used in modern health sciences. We analyzed the relation between annual prescription volumes (APVs) of several antidepressants with marketing approval in Germany and corresponding web search query data generated in Google to test whether web search query volume may be a proxy for medical prescription practice. We obtained APVs of several antidepressants related to corresponding prescriptions at the expense of the statutory health insurance in Germany from 2004 to 2013. Web search query data generated in Germany and related to defined search terms (active substance or brand name) were obtained with Google Trends. We calculated correlations (Person's r) between the APVs of each substance and the respective annual "search share" values; coefficients of determination (R) were computed to determine the amount of variability shared by the 2 variables. Significant and strong correlations between substance-specific APVs and corresponding annual query volumes were found for each substance during the observational interval: agomelatine (r = 0.968, R = 0.932, P = 0.01), bupropion (r = 0.962, R = 0.925, P = 0.01), citalopram (r = 0.970, R = 0.941, P = 0.01), escitalopram (r = 0.824, R = 0.682, P = 0.01), fluoxetine (r = 0.885, R = 0.783, P = 0.01), paroxetine (r = 0.801, R = 0.641, P = 0.01), and sertraline (r = 0.880, R = 0.689, P = 0.01). Although the used data did not allow to perform an analysis with a higher temporal resolution (quarters, months), our results suggest that web search query volume may be a proxy for corresponding prescription behavior. However, further studies analyzing other pharmacologic agents and prescription data that facilitate an increased temporal resolution are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Factors predicting adherence to antidepressant treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Poor adherence and discontinuation of treatment are the major challenges of pharmacotherapy among patients with depression. This article reviews the factors predicting adherence to and persistence of antidepressant treatment identified in recent years.

RECENT FINDINGS

Study populations have been extended to subgroups of patients with depression or depressive patients with comorbid medical conditions. Some studies have investigated the issues by analysing medical claims databases. Socio-demographic variables, clinical features of depression, comorbidities, pharmacological factors, attitudes towards antidepressants, previous experiences of antidepressant treatment, patient-professional relationship and genes were found to be common factors. An older age, positive attitudes to antidepressants and previous experiences and vicarious experiences of depression or treatment were found to be factors predicting better adherence or persistence. Conversely, patients in minority groups, those with a low family income, pregnancy, experience of side effects, dissatisfaction with treatment and a poor patient-professional relationship were found to be associated with poorer adherence or persistence.

SUMMARY

The factors predicting adherence and persistence are complex and interactive. Different methods of studies have limitations in terms of exploring all these factors. Future studies should integrate these factors simultaneously and explore specific factors predicting adherence and persistence among subgroups of patients with depression.