Predicting non-adherence in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia

Psychological determinants and evidence-based behavior change interventions in adherence to therapy for familial hypercholesterolemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia have an elevated risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Risks can be minimized through pharmacological and 'lifestyle' behavioral (low fat diet, physical activity) therapies, although therapeutic adherence is sub-optimal. Behavioral interventions to promote familial hypercholesterolemia therapy adherence should be informed by theory-based psychological determinants for maximal efficacy. The current review summarizes research on determinants of familial hypercholesterolemia therapy adherence and behavior change interventions, identifies limitations of the extant research, and sets future research agenda.

RECENT FINDINGS

A recent meta-analysis identified attitudes, subjective norms, self-efficacy, and risk perceptions as key determinants of familial hypercholesterolemia therapy adherence intentions, with intentions identified as a key correlate of concurrent behavior. Studies have specified techniques targeting key theory-based determinants that may be efficacious in interventions. Research is limited by overuse of cross-sectional correlational study designs, use of self-report behavioral measures, few theory-based intervention tests, and limited consideration of nonconscious processes and effects of socio-structural variables.

SUMMARY

Researchers should adopt study designs permitting better directional and causal inferences in determinant effects, provide tests of interventions targeting determinants and their mechanisms of action, consider determinants representing nonconscious processes (habits, implicit attitudes), and test determinants as mediators of socio-structural variables on familial hypercholesterolemia therapy adherence.

A Systematic Review Uncovering Modifiable Influences on Statin Adherence

Statins are effective in reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, but adherence rates remain low globally. Understanding and addressing modifiable influences on adherence is key to improving outcomes. Existing reviews have methodological limitations, often failing to integrate qualitative and quantitative data or consider specific barriers to statin adherence. This systematic review aimed to identify modifiable barriers and facilitators to statin adherence using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). A comprehensive search of Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL was conducted, covering studies from January 1998 to November 2023. Data were coded to TDF domains and synthesized to identify specific influences on adherence. The nature of the evidence (qualitative or quantitative) was recorded for each influence, and variations among patient groups were noted. Seventy studies from 20 countries were included, with only one focused on ethnic minorities. The most commonly identified domains affecting adherence were "Beliefs about Consequences", "Knowledge", 'Environmental Context and Resources', and "Social Influences". Key factors included knowledge of disease, perceived disease threat, perceived benefits of statins, and patient-provider communication and trust. While side effects had inconsistent associations with adherence, forgetfulness was mainly addressed in quantitative studies, and social influences were highlighted in qualitative research. This review identified modifiable factors that could improve statin adherence. Future research should focus on addressing barriers faced by underrepresented groups to create more inclusive and effective interventions that enhance patient support and communication for better health outcomes.

Sex differences in treatment of familial hypercholesterolaemia: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a highly prevalent monogenic disorder characterized by elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Sex disparities in diagnosis, lipid-lowering therapy, and achieved lipid levels have emerged worldwide, resulting in barriers to care in FH. A systematic review was performed to investigate sex-related disparities in treatment, response, and lipid target achievement in FH (PROSPERO, CRD42022353297).

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane library, PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, and grey literature databases were searched from inception to 26 April 2023. Records were eligible if they described sex differences in the treatment of adults with FH.

RESULTS

Of 4432 publications reviewed, 133 met our eligibility criteria. In 16 interventional clinical trials (eight randomized and eight non-randomized; 1840 participants, 49.4% females), there were no differences between males and females in response to fixed doses of lipid-lowering therapy, suggesting that sex was not a determinant of response. Meta-analysis of 25 real-world observational studies (129 441 participants, 53.4% females) found that females were less likely to be on lipid-lowering therapy compared with males (odds ratio .74, 95% confidence interval .66-.85). Importantly, females were less likely to reach an LDL-C < 2.5 mmol/L (odds ratio .85, 95% confidence interval .74-.97). Similarly, treated LDL-C levels were higher in females. Despite this, male sex was associated with a two-fold greater relative risk of major adverse cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and cardiovascular mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Females with FH were less likely to be treated intensively and to reach guideline-recommended LDL-C targets. This sex bias represents a surmountable barrier to clinical care.

Adherence to pharmacotherapy: sine qua non for reducing cumulative risk of premature coronary disease in familial hypercholesterolemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a dominant and highly penetrant monogenic disorder present from birth that markedly elevates plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol concentration and, if untreated, leads to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The risk of ASCVD can be substantially reduced with lipid-lowering treatment (LLT). However, adherence to LLT remains a major challenge in FH patients and an under-recognized issue. We review several barriers to treatment adherence and implementation strategies for improving adherence in patients with FH.

RECENT FINDINGS

Barriers that negatively affect patient adherence to treatment include the misunderstanding of perceived and actual risk of FH and the benefits of LLT, inadequate knowledge, lack of standardization of treatment, insufficient monitoring of LDL-cholesterol level, and inequalities in healthcare resources. Education of patients, carers and healthcare providers, guideline-directed treatment goals, regular monitoring, medication regimen simplification and greater access to established and new drugs are crucial enablers for improving adherence to treatment. However, given FH is present from birth, strategies for life-long adherence from childhood or young adulthood is critically important and requires further study. To be effective, strategies should be multifaceted, targeted and patient-centred involving a multidisciplinary-team with support from family, communities and peer groups.

SUMMARY

FH confers a significant risk for ASCVD from a young age. Achieving better medication adherence is foundational for improving clinical outcomes and reducing the burden of atherosclerosis over a lifetime. Identification of key barriers and enablers are critical for implementing better adherence to treatment across the life-course of patients with FH.

Sex Differences in Familial Hypercholesterolemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to summarize the existing research on sex differences in familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) across the lifespan.

RECENT FINDINGS

From childhood onward, total- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in girls are higher than those in boys with FH. By the age of 30 years, women with FH have a higher LDL-C burden than men. In adulthood, women are diagnosed later than men, receive less lipid-lowering treatment, and consequently have higher LDL-C levels. An excessive atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk is reported in young female compared to male FH patients. The periods of pregnancy and breastfeeding contribute to treatment loss and increased cholesterol burden. Earlier initiation of treatment, especially in girls with FH, and lifelong treatment during all life stages are important. Future research should aim to recruit both women and men, report sex-specific data, and investigate the impact of the female life course on cardiovascular outcomes. Future guidelines should include sex-specific aspects.

Adherence to statin treatment in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: A dynamic prediction model

BACKGROUND

Statins are the primary therapy in patient with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH). Non-adherence to statin therapy is associated with increased cardiovascular risk.

OBJECTIVE

We constructed a dynamic prediction model to predict statin adherence for an individual HeFH patient for each upcoming statin prescription.

METHODS

All patients with HeFH, identified by the Dutch Familial Hypercholesterolemia screening program between 1994 and 2014, were eligible. National pharmacy records dated between 1995 and 2015 were linked. We developed a dynamic prediction model that estimates the probability of statin adherence (defined as proportion of days covered >80%) for an upcoming prescription using a mixed effect logistic regression model. Static and dynamic patient-specific predictors, as well as data on a patient's adherence to past prescriptions were included. The model with the lowest AIC (Akaike Information Criterion) value was selected.

RESULTS

We included 1094 patients for whom 21,171 times a statin was prescribed. Based on the model with the lowest AIC, age at HeFH diagnosis, history of cardiovascular event, time since HeFH diagnosis and duration of the next statin prescription contributed to an increased adherence, while adherence decreased with higher untreated LDL-C levels and higher intensity of statin therapy. The dynamic prediction model showed an area under the curve of 0.63 at HeFH diagnosis, which increased to 0.85 after six years of treatment.

CONCLUSION

This dynamic prediction model enables clinicians to identify HeFH patients at risk for non-adherence during statin treatment. These patients can be offered timely interventions to improve adherence and further reduce cardiovascular risk.

Screening and treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia in a French sample of ambulatory care patients: A retrospective longitudinal cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Untreated Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) leads to premature morbidity and mortality. In France, its epidemiology and management are understudied in ambulatory care. We described the clinical profile, pharmacological management, and clinical outcomes in a French sample of FH patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective longitudinal study on patients from The Health Improvement Network (THIN®) database in France, between October 2016-June 2019. Patients ≥18 years, with probable/definite FH based on the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria were included. Baseline characteristics, lipid profile, lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement; and disease management at 6-month of follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

116 patients with probable (n = 70)/definite (n = 46) FH were included (mean age:57.8±14.0 years; 56.0% women; 9.5% with personal history of cardiovascular events); 90 patients had data available at follow-up. At baseline, 77.6% of patients had LDL-C>190 mg/dL, 27.6% were not receiving LLTs, 37.9% received statins alone, 20.7% statins with other LLTs, and 7.7% other LLTs. High-intensity statins were prescribed to 11.2% of patients, 30.2% received moderate-intensity statins, and 8.6% low-intensity statins. Only 6.0% of patients achieved LDL-C goal. At 6-month of follow-up, statins discontinuation and switching were 22.7% and 2.3%, respectively. None of the patients received proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors at baseline nor follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the existence of effective LLTs, FH patients are suboptimally-treated, do not achieve LDL-C goal, and exhibit worsened pharmacological management over time. Future studies with longer follow-up periods and assessment of factors affecting LDL-C management, including lifestyle and diet, are needed.

The Knowns and Unknowns of Contemporary Statin Therapy for Familial Hypercholesterolemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Statins are first-line therapy for lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), particularly in heterozygous patients. We review advances and new questions on the use of statins in FH.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cumulative evidence from registry data and sub-analyses of clinical trials mandates the value of statin therapy for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in FH. Statins are safe in children and adolescents with FH, with longer term cardiovascular benefits. The potentially toxic effects of statins in pregnancy need to be considered, but no association has been reported in prospective cohort studies with birth defects. There is no rationale for discontinuation of statins in elderly FH unless indicated by adverse events. FH is undertreated, with > 80% of statin-treated FH patients failing to attain LDL cholesterol treatment targets. This may relate to adherence, tolerability, and genetic differences in statin responsiveness. Statin treatment from childhood may reduce the need for stringent cholesterol targets. Combination of statins with ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors significantly improves the efficacy of treatment. Whether statin use could improve the clinical course of FH patients with COVID-19 and other respiratory infections remains an unsolved issue for future research. Statins are the mainstay for primary and secondary prevention of ASCVD in FH. Sustained long-term optimal statin treatment from an early age can effectively prevent ASCVD over decades of life. Despite their widespread use, statins merit further investigation in FH.

Cardiovascular risk and undertreatment of dyslipidemia in lung cancer survivors: A nationwide population-based study

BACKGROUND

In lung cancer survivors, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of noncancer deaths. Nonetheless, there is lack of information on management of dyslipidemia, a major risk factor for future CVD events, in lung cancer survivors. This study aimed to assess dyslipidemia management and prevalence of statin eligibility in lung cancer survivors.

METHODS

From the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we selected 7349 lung cancer survivors who received surgery for lung cancer from 2007 to 2014. We used descriptive statistics for analyses of dyslipidemia management status on the basis of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. We also identified those who met the criteria for treatment on the basis of CVD risk according to the 2018 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines.

RESULTS

The overall awareness and treatment rates for lung cancer survivors with dyslipidemia were 31.8% and 29.7%, respectively. The overall control rate for those receiving treatment was 88.7%, but was lowest in the highest risk group (78.1%). Furthermore, undertreatment of dyslipidemia was more prominent in young, male lung cancer survivors and those diagnosed with lung cancer within 3 years. Among those not receiving treatment for dyslipidemia, 61.7% were indicated for statin according to the ACC/AHA guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Over half of lung cancer survivors were not receiving treatment, although they were eligible for statin under current guidelines. To reduce noncancer mortality, statin use and adequate management of CVD risk factors should be encouraged in lung cancer survivors.

Efficiency and problems of statin therapy in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is associated with a very high risk of cardiovascular complications and the need for an early aggressive lipid-lowering therapy. The achievement of lipid target levels is often an extremely difficult task in these patients.

AIMS

to analyze sex and age structure of ischemic heart disease (IHD) in patients with a definite, possible and probable FH. to assess the degree of achievement of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target levels in FH patients on statin therapy and complications that occur during therapy; to analyze the adherence of FH patients to statin therapy and reveal the factors which have an influence on it.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The analysis of IHD clinical characteristics was performed in 253 FH patients from Karelian register, mean age 52.5 years (confidence interval, CI 22.0; 78.0). Using Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Criteria (DLCN), we established the diagnosis of FH as "definite" if the total number of points was more than eight, "probable" - if the number of points was 6-8, "possible" if the number of points was 3-5. The diagnosis was considered to be excluded if the score was less than three. A definite FH was diagnosed in 96 patients. For the evaluation of target LDL-C levels achievement on statin therapy we analyzed data from 191 FH patients (75 males). For the evaluation of adherence to statin therapy Morisky-Green questionnaire was used in 93 definite FH patients.

RESULTS

In the group with a definite FH the incidence of IHD in the age range from 39 to 60 years was higher in women than in men (50% and 39.4%, p > 0.05), in patients older than 60 years IHD was observed in 66.7% of women and 50% of men (p > 0.05). In general, in the group with a definite FH, the frequency of IHD was more than three times higher in the age group over 40 years compared with patients under 40 years. 57% of patients with a definite FH were adherent to lipid-lowering therapy, 16% had partial adherence and no adherence to therapy was documented in 27% of patients. The achievement of LDL-C target levels was 19.2%: 22.6% in definite FH group and 12.5% in possible FH. Smoking and gender were not associated with adherence to statin therapy. Associated factors with increased adherence to statin therapy were age (p = 0.000003), arterial hypertension (OR = 1.90 (1.02; to 3.55), p = 0.044), the history of IHD (OR = 2.99 (1.50; of 5.97) p = 0.002), myocardial infarction (OR = 5.26 (2.03; 13.60), p = 0.0006), myocardial revascularization (OR = 20.3 (2.64; 156.11), p = 0.004) and the fact of target LDL-cholesterol levels achievement (OR = 19.93 (7.03; 56.50), p < 0.0001). The main reason for the non-acceptance of statin therapy for FH patients was the fear of side effects in 87%. The main reasons for stopping current statin intake were myalgia in 12%, an increase in transaminases in 35%, skin rashes in 12%, and high cost in 6%. 29% of patients had made the decision to stop therapy themselves.

CONCLUSIONS

the frequency of IHD in FH patients was more than three times higher in the age group over 40 years and was higher in women. In clinical practice statin therapy in FH patients rarely reaches target lipid values, one of the reasons was low adherence to statin therapy.

Enablers and barriers to treatment adherence in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a qualitative evidence synthesis

OBJECTIVES

Individuals with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) are at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). This risk can be substantially reduced with lifelong pharmacological and lifestyle treatment; however, research suggests adherence is poor. We synthesised the qualitative research to identify enablers and barriers to treatment adherence.

DESIGN

This study conducted a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO via OVID, Cochrane library and CINAHL databases and grey literature sources were searched through September 2018.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included studies conducted in individuals with FH, and their family members, which reported primary qualitative data regarding their experiences of and beliefs about their condition and its treatment.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Quality assessment was undertaken using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme for qualitative studies. A thematic synthesis was conducted to uncover descriptive and generate analytical themes. These findings were then used to identify enablers and barriers to treatment adherence for application in clinical practice.

RESULTS

24 papers reporting the findings of 15 population samples (264 individuals with FH and 13 of their family members) across 8 countries were included. Data captured within 20 descriptive themes were considered in relation to treatment adherence and 6 analytical themes were generated: risk assessment; perceived personal control of health; disease identity; family influence; informed decision-making; and incorporating treatment into daily life. These findings were used to identify seven enablers (eg, 'commencement of treatment from a young age') and six barriers (eg, 'incorrect and/or inadequate knowledge of treatment advice') to treatment adherence. There were insufficient data to explore if the findings differed between adults and children.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings reveal several enablers and barriers to treatment adherence in individuals with FH. These could be used in clinical practice to facilitate optimal adherence to lifelong treatment thereby minimising the risk of CVD in this vulnerable population.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018085946.

Familial hypercholesterolemia and young patients' thoughts on own condition and treatment

OBJECTIVES

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a hereditary and usually asymptomatic condition characterized by elevated blood cholesterol and increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease. It is treated with dietary modifications and lipid lowering drugs. The objective was to learn about young FH patients' perceptions and choices regarding treatment.

METHODS

Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 24 patients (ages 16-35), and analysed according to Grounded Theory.

RESULTS

The findings are presented as theoretical concepts describing the participants' way of handling their condition. The core category was identified as "Thoughts of consequences vs. Postponing thoughts of consequences", which could be described through the following subcategories: 1. Normalising the condition, 2. Belittling of treatment vs. Committed to treatment and 3. Trust in advice vs. Avoid unnecessary interference. The participants' position regarding these categories was described to affect motivation and challenges with treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants who postpone the thoughts of consequences, belittle the treatment and avoid unnecessary interference represent a challenge to health care practitioners.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Practitioners should explore aspects such as thoughts of consequences, view of treatment and the feeling of interference to be able to better understand illness behaviour, adjust their communication and hopefully improve adherence.

[Lipid Lowering Therapy with Statins in Patients with Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia]

AIM

to analyze adherence of FH patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) to the statin therapy and reveal factors, which influence it; to assess the degree of target level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLCH) achievement by FH patients on statin therapy. Materials and methods. We included in this study 203 FH patients aged &gt;18 years (mean age 50.0±1.1 years, 82 men). Definite FH was diagnosed in 96 persons, in the other patients FH was considered possible. For evaluating the adherence to therapy with statins we used the Morisky-Green questionnaire. Results. Among patients with definite FH 57 % were adherent to lipid-lowering therapy, 16 % were partially adherent, and 27 % - not adherent. Target LDLCH levels were achieved in 22.6 % and 12.5 % of patients with definite and possible FH, respectively. Smoking and gender were not associated with adherence to statin therapy. Factors associated with higher adherence were age (p=0.000003), arterial hypertension (odds ratio [OR] 1.90, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 3.55], p=0.044), ischemic heart disease (IHD) (OR=2.99, 95 %CI 1.50 to 5.97, p=0.002), history of myocardial infarction (MI) (OR 5.26, 95 %CI 2.03 to 13.60, p=0.0006), history of myocardial revascularization (OR 20.3, 95 %CI 2.64 to 156.11, p=0.004) and the fact of achieving target LDLCH level (OR 19.93, 95 %CI 7.03 to 56.50, p&lt;0.0001). The main reason for the refuse from statin therapy in 87 % of patients was fear of side effects. Main reasons for stopping of ongoing therapy were: myalgia, an increase in transaminases, skin rashes, and high cost in 12, 35, 12, and 6 % of patients, respectively. The decision to withdraw therapy with statins was made by 29 % of patients by themselves.

CONCLUSION

In this study 57 % of patients with definite FH were adherent to statin therapy. Factors associated with increased adherence were age, hypertension, IHD, history of MI, history of myocardial revascularization, achievement of target LDLCH level. Target LDLCH levels were achieved by 22.6 and 12.5 %% of patients with definite and possible FH, respectively.

How Health Care Professionals Evaluate a Digital Intervention to Improve Medication Adherence: Qualitative Exploratory Study

Background

Medication nonadherence poses a serious and a hard-to-tackle problem for many chronic diseases. Electronic health (eHealth) apps that foster patient engagement and shared decision making (SDM) may be a novel approach to improve medication adherence.

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the perspective of health care professionals regarding a newly developed digital app aimed to improve medication adherence. Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) was chosen as a case example.

Methods

A Web-based prototype of the eHealth app—MIK—was codesigned with patients and health care professionals. After user tests with patients, we performed semistructured interviews and user tests with 12 physicians from 6 different hospitals to examine how the functionalities offered by MIK could assist physicians in their consultation and how they could be integrated into daily clinical practice. Qualitative thematic analysis was used to identify themes that covered the physicians’ evaluations.

Results

On the basis of the interview data, 3 themes were identified, which were (1) perceived impact on patient-physician collaboration; (2) perceived impact on the patient’s understanding and self-management regarding medication adherence; and (3) perceived impact on clinical decisions and workflow.

Conclusions

The eHealth app MIK seems to have the potential to improve the consultation between the patient and the physician in terms of collaboration and patient engagement. The impact of eHealth apps based on the concept of SDM for improving medication-taking behavior and clinical outcomes is yet to be evaluated. Insights will be useful for further development of eHealth apps aimed at improving self-management by means of patient engagement and SDM.

Contemporary rates and correlates of statin use and adherence in nondiabetic adults with cardiovascular risk factors: The KP CHAMP study

BACKGROUND

Statin therapy is highly efficacious in the prevention of fatal and nonfatal atherosclerotic events in persons at increased cardiovascular risk. However, its long-term effectiveness in practice depends on a high level of medication adherence by patients.

METHODS

We identified nondiabetic adults with cardiovascular risk factors between 2008 and 2010 within a large integrated health care delivery system in Northern California. Through 2013, we examined the use and adherence of newly initiated statin therapy based on data from dispensed prescriptions from outpatient pharmacy databases.

RESULTS

Among 209,704 eligible adults, 68,085 (32.5%) initiated statin therapy during the follow-up period, with 90.4% receiving low-potency statins. At 12 and 24 months after initiating statins, 84.3% and 80.2%, respectively, were actively receiving statin therapy, but only 42% and 30%, respectively, had no gaps in treatment during those time periods. There was also minimal switching between statins or use of other lipid-lowering therapies for augmentation during follow-up. Age≥50 years, Asian/Pacific Islander race, Hispanic ethnicity, prior myocardial infarction, prior ischemic stroke, hypertension, and baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol>100 mg/dL were associated with higher adjusted odds, whereas female gender, black race, current smoking, dementia were associated with lower adjusted odds, of active statin treatment at 12 months after initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

There remain opportunities for improving prevention in patients at risk for cardiovascular events. Our study identified certain patient subgroups that may benefit from interventions to enhance medication adherence, particularly by minimizing treatment gaps and discontinuation of statin therapy within the first year of treatment.

Prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia: The role of PCSK9 inhibitors

Familial hypercholesterolaemia is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder characterised by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and consequently an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Familial hypercholesterolaemia is relatively common, but is often underdiagnosed and undertreated. Cardiologists are likely to encounter many individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia; however, patients presenting with premature ASCVD are rarely screened for familial hypercholesterolaemia and fasting lipid levels are infrequently documented. Given that individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia and ASCVD are at a particularly high risk of subsequent cardiac events, this is a missed opportunity for preventive therapy. Furthermore, because there is a 50% chance that first-degree relatives of individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia will also be affected by the disorder, the underdiagnosis of familial hypercholesterolaemia among patients with ASCVD is a barrier to cascade screening and the prevention of ASCVD in affected relatives. Targeted screening of patients with ASCVD is an effective strategy to identify new familial hypercholesterolaemia index cases. Statins are the standard treatment for individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia; however, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets are not achieved in a large proportion of patients despite treatment. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have been shown to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels considerably in individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia who are concurrently receiving the maximal tolerated statin dose. The clinical benefit of PCSK9 inhibitors must, however, also be considered in terms of their cost-effectiveness. Increased awareness of familial hypercholesterolaemia is required among healthcare professionals, particularly cardiologists and primary care physicians, in order to start early preventive measures and to reduce the mortality and morbidity associated with familial hypercholesterolaemia and ASCVD.

Drug treatment and adherence of subjects <40 years with diagnosis of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We aimed at describing the therapeutic approach in young adult patients diagnosed with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) and their adherence and persistence to treatment.

METHODS

From regional administrative databases, individuals aged ≤40 years, who received exemption for HeFH between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2011, and concomitantly started statin treatment, were identified. Within the first year of treatment, we evaluated therapeutic changes, adherence as MPR (medication possession ratio), persistence as continuous drug coverage without gaps ≥60 days, and influencing factors using log binomial models.

RESULTS

Of 1404 patients, 42.4% were initially treated with a high-efficacy statin. 23.4% of patients showed at least one treatment change. Mean MPR was 68.7% (29.9), and patients showing continued statin use were 47.0%. Therapy modification was significantly associated with a past cardiovascular event (relative risk, RR [95% confidential interval] 2.28 [1.69-3.09]) and at least one lipid test (RR 1.82 [1.31-2.53]). MPR ≥80% was significantly associated with the first statin prescribed (atorvastatin RR 1.28 [1.09-1.51] and rosuvastatin RR 1.21 [1.01-1.44], vs. simvastatin), a past cardiovascular event (RR 1.33 [1.12-1.59]), at least one therapy change (RR 1.28 [1.15-1.43]), at least a lipid test (RR 1.26 [1.07-1.49]). A similar pattern was observed for persistence.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of young adult HeFH patients showed that therapy change was quite frequent, and probably reflected adjustments according to individual response. Adherence and persistence were inadequate, even in this population at high cardiovascular risk, and they need to be improved through proper patient education and shared treatment decision-making approach.

The genetics and screening of familial hypercholesterolaemia

Familial Hypercholesterolaemia is an autosomal, dominant genetic disorder that leads to elevated blood cholesterol and a dramatically increased risk of atherosclerosis. It is perceived as a rare condition. However it affects 1 in 250 of the population globally, making it an important public health concern. In communities with founder effects, higher disease prevalences are observed.

We discuss the genetic basis of familial hypercholesterolaemia, examining the distribution of variants known to be associated with the condition across the exons of the genes LDLR, ApoB, PCSK9 and LDLRAP1. We also discuss screening programmes for familial hypercholesterolaemia and their cost-effectiveness. Diagnosis typically occurs using one of the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DCLN), Simon Broome Register (SBR) or Make Early Diagnosis to Prevent Early Death (MEDPED) criteria, each of which requires a different set of patient data. New cases can be identified by screening the family members of an index case that has been identified as a result of referral to a lipid clinic in a process called cascade screening. Alternatively, universal screening may be used whereby a population is systematically screened.

It is currently significantly more cost effective to identify familial hypercholesterolaemia cases through cascade screening than universal screening. However, the cost of sequencing patient DNA has fallen dramatically in recent years and if the rate of progress continues, this may change.