Different methods, different results--how do available methods link a patient's anticholinergic load with adverse outcomes?

Systematic review on the use of anticholinergic scales in elderly chronic patients

BACKGROUND

The rising prevalence of chronic conditions and polypharmacy in the elderly increases the risk of anticholinergic burden, the cumulative effect of multiple anticholinergic drugs. However, no standard exists for assessing anticholinergic burden in these patients, resulting in various anticholinergic scales with differing methodologies and outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To identify existing anticholinergic scales that are applicable to elderly chronic patients and to compare their main characteristics, included drugs and anticholinergic potential scores. In addition, we aim to analyse the previous validation of these scales.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science; PROSPERO ID CRD42024505226; October 2023) for studies on anticholinergic scales applicable to elderly patients with chronic conditions. We also examined the validation of these tools in predicting anticholinergic-related adverse outcomes. Inclusion criteria targeted studies on anticholinergic scales for patients aged ≥65 with chronic conditions, excluding those hospitalized or with specific diseases. Quality assessments utilized JBI tools and SQUIRE 2.0 standards.

RESULTS

From 1399 references, 18 anticholinergic scales development studies were included. Different scales varied in creation methodology, with some based on literature, review of previous scales or experimental data. The included studies are heterogeneous in terms of design and results of their quality analysis. For the second objective, 29 validation studies were considered, with mixed associations found between anticholinergic scales and health outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Current anticholinergic scales and validation studies are diverse and show mixed and controversial results, with evidence often coming from retrospective or low-quality studies; indicating the necessity for future research to focus on developing a clinically applicable tool for accurately assessing anticholinergic burden in the elderly with chronic conditions.

Anticholinergic burden and behavioral and psychological symptoms in older patients with cognitive impairment

Background

Drugs with anticholinergic properties are frequently prescribed to patients with cognitive impairment. The cholinergic system plays an important role in learning processes, memory, and emotions regulation. The aim of this research is to report use of anticholinergic drugs in a clinical population and to investigate the correlation between the use of anticholinergic drugs and the risk of presenting with more severe behavioral and psychological symptoms (BPSD).

Method

Patients with a diagnosis of subjective cognitive impairment, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia were recruited. Screening tests for cognitive impairment (MMSE) and functional status (ADL, IADL) were performed. BPSD were evaluated with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). The anticholinergic burden was calculated using the ACB calculator. We compared patients at low risk of anticholinergic adverse effects (ACB < 3) versus patients at high risk (ACB ≥ 3). Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney test were used to compare the two groups. A multiple linear regression was performed to identify factors associated with higher NPI score and a logistic regression model was built to identify drug classes associated with ACB ≥ 3.

Result

A total of 173 patients (mean age 74 ± 7, 74 men) were included in the study; 132 patients with ACB < 3 (low risk) versus 41 patients with ACB ≥3 (high risk) were compared. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of demographics (age, sex) and anamnestic variables (education, marital status, family history of dementia, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, dyslipidemia, atrial fibrillation, coronary heart disease and use of alcohol). Significantly higher NPI scores were found in patients with ACB ≥ 3 (mean scores 47.3 ± 34.8 versus 25.5 ± 24.6, p < 0.001). Patients with ACB ≥ 3 showed lower MMSE (18.5 ± 8.6 versus 22.4 ± 7, p = 0.004) and more IADLs lost. In the multivariate regression analysis, after adjusting for age, sex, polypharmacy and IADLs lost, only the MMSE and the ACB scores were independent predictors of the NPI score. Being on antipsychotics, antidepressants and antidiabetic drugs was associated with increased risk of higher anticholinergic burden.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the anticholinergic burden might play a significant role as a risk factor for developing more severe BPSD in patients with cognitive decline, independently from their degree of cognitive impairment.

High Anticholinergic Burden and Dental Caries: Findings from Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966

INTRODUCTION

Anticholinergic drugs propose a threat for oral health by causing dry mouth. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate whether a high anticholinergic burden was associated with the presence of initial caries lesions, manifested caries lesions, dental fillings, or tooth loss among 46-y-old people.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 1,906 participants from the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 who underwent an oral health examination in 2012-2013. Socioeconomic and medical data were collected from questionnaires, medical records, and national registers. Nine previously published anticholinergic scales were combined and used to measure the high anticholinergic burden from the participants' medication data. Cariological status was determined according to the International Caries Detection and Assessment System, and the number of missing teeth (excluding third molars) was used as an indicator for tooth loss. The decayed, missing, and filled surfaces index was used to depict caries experience. Negative binominal regression models were used to estimate prevalence rate ratios (PRRs) and confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Fourteen percent of the participants (n = 276) used at least 1 anticholinergic drug and about 3% had a high anticholinergic burden (n = 61). After adjusting for confounding factors, participants with a high anticholinergic burden had a higher likelihood of having manifested carious lesions needing restorative treatment (PRR, 1.60; CI, 1.11-2.29) and more missing teeth (PRR, 1.59; CI, 1.13-2.24) when compared to participants without any or with a lower anticholinergic burden.

CONCLUSIONS

High anticholinergic burden was associated with a present caries experience and with tooth loss among the general middle-aged population.

KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT

The findings of this study suggest that middle-aged patients with a high anticholinergic burden may have a heightened risk of dental caries. These patients may benefit from targeted caries preventive regimes.

Anticholinergic Burden and Dry Mouth Problems Among Older Adults (≥ 50 Years) Receiving Dental Care-A Retrospective, Cross-Sectional Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Anticholinergics cause dry mouth and are highly relevant for dentists, but little is known about the relationships between intake and the occurrence of subjective and objective dry mouth with age. The German anticholinergic burden score (GACB) is a novel anticholinergic score that re-evaluates medications, particularly, those with classification discrepancies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the GACB in older patients receiving dental care, evaluated whether GACB is related to xerostomia and unstimulated salivary secretion, and determined the influence of increasing age (beginning at 50 years of age). The GACB score quantified cumulative anticholinergic effects: 0 for no effect, 1 for possible, 2 for moderate, and 3 for strong. Cross-sectional data in patients ≥ 50 years were collected, including xerostomia with the visual analog scale, unstimulated salivary flow rates, and the GACB scores.

RESULTS

Among 172 patients (mean age 65.67 ± 9.51 years), 23.8% had a GACB score ≥ 1. A moderate negative correlation was observed between GACB and unstimulated salivary flow rates (r ̅ $\mathop{r}\limits^{̅}$  = -0.51). Patients with GACB ≥ 1 had fewer teeth (mean 21.76 ± 5.41) than those with GACB = 0 (24.07 ± 5.57). Moreover, unstimulated hyposalivation was observed in 61.0% with GACB ≥ 1 versus 6.8% with GACB = 0 (p < 0.001). Escalating chronic systemic conditions and prescribed medications were recorded with increasing age; those aged 76-80 years had the highest burden.

CONCLUSIONS

The GACB quickly and reliably assesses anticholinergic exposure and risks for oral health in older patients. Routine use in those aged ≥ 50 years could enable early identification of risks and initiation of preventive dental measures.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Registry for Clinical Trials: DRKS00032877 (https://www.germanctr.de; date of registration: 17.10.2023).

Assessing the feasibility of anticholinergic burden scales and measures in administrative data: A systematic review

AIM

This systematic review aimed to identify and evaluate the quality and adaptability of existing anticholinergic burden scales and measures by using administrative dispensing data.

METHOD

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Google Scholar databases from 2001 to 2022. Studies that introduced, updated, or modified anticholinergic burden scales and measures were included in this review. Quality assessment considered various aspects, including scoring systems, tool development criteria, and specific requirements tailored for administrative data.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight anticholinergic burden scales and measures were identified in 14 countries. The Modified Anticholinergic Risk Scale excelled in the scoring system, while the German Anticholinergic Burden Scale stood out in the scale development process. However, significant variability was observed in methodologies, medication listings, and adaptability to administrative data. Quality assessment considers aspects such as potency, dose, exposure duration, longitudinal measurement, clinical interpretation, and compatibility with administrative data variables. The evaluation also considered tool development criteria including evidence for medication selection, panel expertise, relevance, updating methods, international applicability, validation, and clinical guidance.

CONCLUSION

This review emphasizes the importance of adaptable and robust tools that can work well with administrative data to ensure patient safety and better health outcomes, given the ongoing evolution of anticholinergic medications. The findings of this systematic review provide valuable insights for clinicians and researchers in selecting the most appropriate anticholinergic burden scale or measure according to their specific needs and data sources. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (registration ID CRD42023423959).

The Prognostic Utility of Anticholinergic Burden Scales: An Integrative Review and Gap Analysis

BACKGROUND

Anticholinergic drugs are commonly prescribed, especially to older adults. Anticholinergic burden scales (ABS) have been used to evaluate the cumulative effects of multiple anticholinergics. However, studies have shown inconsistent results regarding the association between anticholinergic burden assessed with ABS and adverse clinical outcomes such as cognitive impairment, functional decline, and frailty. This review aims to identify gaps in research on the development, validation, and evaluation of ABS, and provide recommendations for future studies.

METHOD

A comprehensive search of five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL, CENTRAL) was conducted for relevant studies published from inception until 25 May 2023. Two reviewers screened for eligibility and assessed the quality of studies using different tools based on the study design and stage of the review framework. Research evidence was evaluated, and gaps were identified and grouped into evidence, knowledge, and methodological gaps, using evidence tables to summarize data.

RESULTS

Several evidence, knowledge, and methodological gaps in existing development, validation, and evaluation studies of ABS were identified. There is no universally accepted scale, and there is a need to define a clinically relevant threshold for measuring total anticholinergic burden. The current evidence has limitations, underrepresenting low- and middle-income countries, younger individuals, and populations with cognitive disabilities. The impact of anticholinergic burden on frailty is also understudied. Existing evaluation studies provide limited evidence on the benefit of reducing anticholinergic burden on clinical outcomes or the safety of anticholinergic deprescribing. There is also uncertainty regarding optimal reduction, clinically significant anticholinergic burden thresholds, and cost effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research recommendations to bridge knowledge gaps include developing a risk assessment framework, refining ABS scales, establishing a standardized consensus scale, and creating a longitudinal measure of cumulative anticholinergic risk. Strategies to minimize bias, consider frailty, and promote multidisciplinary and multinational collaborations are also necessary to improve patient outcomes.

Development of the Swedish anticholinergic burden scale (Swe-ABS)

BACKGROUND

Drugs with anticholinergic properties are associated with cognitive adverse effects, especially in patients vulnerable to central muscarinic antagonism. A variety of drugs show weak, moderate or strong anticholinergic effects. Therefore, the cumulative anticholinergic burden should be considered in patients with cognitive impairment. This study aimed to develop a Swedish Anticholinergic Burden Scale (Swe-ABS) to be used in health care and research.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed and Ovid Embase to identify previously published tools quantifying anticholinergic drug burden (i.e., exposure). Drugs and grading scores (0-3, no to high anticholinergic activity) were extracted from identified lists. Enteral and parenteral drugs authorized in Sweden were included. Drugs with conflicting scores in the existing lists were assessed by an expert group. Two drugs that were not previously assessed were also added to the evaluation process.

RESULTS

The systematic literature search identified the following nine anticholinergic burden scales: Anticholinergic Activity Scale, Anticholinergic Burden Classification, updated Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale, Anticholinergic Drug Scale, Anticholinergic Load Scale, Anticholinergic Risk Scale, updated Clinician-rated Anticholinergic Scale, German Anticholinergic Burden Scale and Korean Anticholinergic Burden Scale. A list of drugs with significant anticholinergic effects provided by The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare was included in the process. The suggested Swe-ABS consists of 104 drugs scored as having weak, moderate or strong anticholinergic effects. Two hundred and fifty-six drugs were listed as having no anticholinergic effects based on evaluation in previous scales. In total, 62 drugs were assessed by the expert group.

CONCLUSIONS

Swe-ABS is a simplified method to quantify the anticholinergic burden and is easy to use in clinical practice. Publication of this scale might make clinicians more aware of drugs with anticholinergic properties and patients' total anticholinergic burden. Further research is needed to validate the Swe-ABS and evaluate anticholinergic exposure versus clinically significant outcomes.

A Universal Pharmacological-Based List of Drugs with Anticholinergic Activity

Anticholinergic burden tools have relevant pharmacological gaps that may explain their limited predictive ability for clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to provide a universal pharmacological-based list of drugs with their documented affinity for muscarinic receptors. A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify the anticholinergic burden tools. Drugs included in these instruments were searched in four pharmacological databases, and the investigation was supplemented with PubMed. The evidence regarding the potential antagonism of the five muscarinic receptors of each drug was assessed. The proportion of drugs included in the tools with an affinity for muscarinic receptors was evaluated. A universal list of drugs with anticholinergic activity was developed based on their documented affinity for the different subtypes of muscarinic receptors and their ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. A total of 23 tools were identified, including 304 different drugs. Only 48.68%, 47.70%, 48.03%, 43.75%, and 42.76% of the drugs had an affinity to the M1, M2, M3, M4, and M5 receptor, respectively, reported in any pharmacological database. The proportion of drugs with confirmed antagonism varied among the tools (36.8% to 100%). A universal pharmacological-based list of 133 drugs is presented. It should be further validated in different clinical settings.

Anticholinergic burden for prediction of cognitive decline or neuropsychiatric symptoms in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia

BACKGROUND

Medications with anticholinergic properties are commonly prescribed to older adults with a pre-existing diagnosis of dementia or cognitive impairment. The cumulative anticholinergic effect of all the medications a person takes is referred to as the anticholinergic burden because of its potential to cause adverse effects. It is possible that a high anticholinergic burden may be a risk factor for further cognitive decline or neuropsychiatric disturbances in people with dementia. Neuropsychiatric disturbances are the most frequent complication of dementia that require hospitalisation, accounting for almost half of admissions; hence, identification of modifiable prognostic factors for these outcomes is crucial. There are various scales available to measure anticholinergic burden but agreement between them is often poor.

OBJECTIVES

Our primary objective was to assess whether anticholinergic burden, as defined at the level of each individual scale, was a prognostic factor for further cognitive decline or neuropsychiatric disturbances in older adults with pre-existing diagnoses of dementia or cognitive impairment. Our secondary objective was to investigate whether anticholinergic burden was a prognostic factor for other adverse clinical outcomes, including mortality, impaired physical function, and institutionalisation.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched these databases from inception to 29 November 2021: MEDLINE OvidSP, Embase OvidSP, PsycINFO OvidSP, CINAHL EBSCOhost, and ISI Web of Science Core Collection on ISI Web of Science.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included prospective and retrospective longitudinal cohort and case-control observational studies, with a minimum of one-month follow-up, which examined the association between an anticholinergic burden measurement scale and the above stated adverse clinical outcomes, in older adults with pre-existing diagnoses of dementia or cognitive impairment.   DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, and undertook data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and GRADE assessment. We summarised risk associations between anticholinergic burden and all clinical outcomes in a narrative fashion. We also evaluated the risk association between anticholinergic burden and mortality using a random-effects meta-analysis.  We established adjusted pooled rates for the anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB) scale; then, as an exploratory analysis, established pooled rates on the prespecified association across scales.  MAIN RESULTS: We identified 18 studies that met our inclusion criteria (102,684 older adults). Anticholinergic burden was measured using five distinct measurement scales: 12 studies used the ACB scale; 3 studies used the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS); 1 study used the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS); 1 study used the Anticholinergic Effect on Cognition (AEC) Scale; and 2 studies used a list developed by Tune and Egeli.  Risk associations between anticholinergic burden and adverse clinical outcomes were highly heterogenous. Four out of 10 (40%) studies reported a significantly increased risk of greater long-term cognitive decline for participants with an anticholinergic burden compared to participants with no or minimal anticholinergic burden. No studies investigated neuropsychiatric disturbance outcomes. One out of four studies (25%) reported a significant association with reduced physical function for participants with an anticholinergic burden versus participants with no or minimal anticholinergic burden. No study (out of one investigating study) reported a significant association between anticholinergic burden and risk of institutionalisation. Six out of 10 studies (60%) found a significantly increased risk of mortality for those with an anticholinergic burden compared to those with no or minimal anticholinergic burden. Pooled analysis of adjusted mortality hazard ratios (HR) measured anticholinergic burden with the ACB scale, and suggested a significantly increased risk of death for those with a high ACB score relative to those with no or minimal ACB scores (HR 1.153, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.030 to 1.292; 4 studies, 48,663 participants). An exploratory pooled analysis of adjusted mortality HRs across anticholinergic burden scales also suggested a significantly increased risk of death for those with a high anticholinergic burden (HR 1.102, 95% CI 1.044 to 1.163; 6 studies, 68,381 participants).   Overall GRADE evaluation of results found low- or very low-certainty evidence for all outcomes.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is low-certainty evidence that older adults with dementia or cognitive impairment who have a significant anticholinergic burden may be at increased risk of death. No firm conclusions can be drawn for risk of accelerated cognitive decline, neuropsychiatric disturbances, decline in physical function, or institutionalisation.

The effect of the anticholinergic burden on duration and severity of delirium in older hip-surgery patients with and without haloperidol prophylaxis: A post hoc analysis

BACKGROUND

Anticholinergic acting drugs have been associated with delirium in older patients.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between the anticholinergic burden (ACB) and the duration and severity of delirium in older hip-surgery patients with or without haloperidol prophylaxis.

METHODS

Older patients with a postoperative delirium following hip surgery from a randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of haloperidol prophylaxis on delirium incidence were included in this study. The ACB was quantified using two different tools, the Anticholinergic Drug Scale and an Expert Panel. Using linear regression, the association between the ACB and delirium was analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall delirium duration and severity were not significantly associated with the ACB. Also, no statistically significant differences were found in delirium duration or severity between the placebo and haloperidol treatment groups for the ACB groups. The protective effect of haloperidol on delirium duration and severity however tended to be present in patients with no or a low ACB but not or to a lesser extent in patients with an intermediate to high ACB.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACB was not significantly associated with delirium duration or severity. Haloperidol prophylaxis tended to shorten delirium duration and decrease delirium severity in patients with no or a low ACB. To further explore the influence of anticholinergic acting drugs on delirium duration and severity and the effect of concomitant haloperidol use, additional research with a higher haloperidol dose, a larger study population, and ACB quantification taking drug exposure into account is warranted.

Anticholinergic burden (prognostic factor) for prediction of dementia or cognitive decline in older adults with no known cognitive syndrome

BACKGROUND

Medications with anticholinergic properties are commonly prescribed to older adults. The cumulative anticholinergic effect of all the medications a person takes is referred to as the 'anticholinergic burden' because of its potential to cause adverse effects. It is possible that high anticholinergic burden may be a risk factor for development of cognitive decline or dementia. There are various scales available to measure anticholinergic burden but agreement between them is often poor.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether anticholinergic burden, as defined at the level of each individual scale, is a prognostic factor for future cognitive decline or dementia in cognitively unimpaired older adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases from inception to 24 March 2021: MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase (OvidSP), PsycINFO (OvidSP), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and ISI Web of Science Core Collection (ISI Web of Science).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included prospective and retrospective longitudinal cohort and case-control observational studies with a minimum of one year' follow-up that examined the association between an anticholinergic burden measurement scale and future cognitive decline or dementia in cognitively unimpaired older adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, and undertook data extraction, assessment of risk of bias, and GRADE assessment. We extracted odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and linear data on the association between anticholinergic burden and cognitive decline or dementia. We intended to pool each metric separately; however, only OR-based data were suitable for pooling via a random-effects meta-analysis. We initially established adjusted and unadjusted pooled rates for each available anticholinergic scale; then, as an exploratory analysis, established pooled rates on the prespecified association across scales. We examined variability based on severity of anticholinergic burden.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 25 studies that met our inclusion criteria (968,428 older adults). Twenty studies were conducted in the community care setting, two in primary care clinics, and three in secondary care settings. Eight studies (320,906 participants) provided suitable data for meta-analysis. The Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale (ACB scale) was the only scale with sufficient data for 'scale-based' meta-analysis. Unadjusted ORs suggested an increased risk for cognitive decline or dementia in older adults with an anticholinergic burden (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.96) and adjusted ORs similarly suggested an increased risk for anticholinergic burden, defined according to the ACB scale (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.09 to 6.29). Exploratory analysis combining adjusted ORs across available scales supported these results (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.38 to 3.38), and there was evidence of variability in risk based on severity of anticholinergic burden (ACB scale 1: OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.11 to 4.29; ACB scale 2: OR 2.71, 95% CI 2.01 to 3.56; ACB scale 3: OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.41 to 7.61); however, overall GRADE evaluation of certainty of the evidence was low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is low-certainty evidence that older adults without cognitive impairment who take medications with anticholinergic effects may be at increased risk of cognitive decline or dementia.

Anticholinergic drug burden according to the anticholinergic drug scale and the German anticholinergic burden and their impact on cognitive function in multimorbid elderly German people: a multicentre observational study

OBJECTIVES

The aims of our study were to examine the anticholinergic drug use and to assess the association between anticholinergic burden and cognitive function in the multimorbid elderly patients of the MultiCare cohort.

SETTING

MultiCare was conducted as a longitudinal cohort study in primary care, located in eight different study centres in Germany.

PARTICIPANTS

3189 patients (59.3% female).

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Baseline data were used for the following analyses. Drugs were classified according to the well-established anticholinergic drug scale (ADS) and the recently published German anticholinergic burden (German ACB). Cognitive function was measured using a letter digit substitution test (LDST) and a mixed-effect multivariate linear regression was performed to calculate the influence of anticholinergic burden on the cognitive function.

RESULTS

Patients used 1764 anticholinergic drugs according to ADS and 2750 anticholinergics according to the German ACB score (prevalence 38.4% and 53.7%, respectively). The mean ADS score was 0.8 (±1.3), and the mean German ACB score was 1.2 (±1.6) per patient. The most common ADS anticholinergic was furosemide (5.8%) and the most common ACB anticholinergic was metformin (13.7%). The majority of the identified anticholinergics were drugs with low anticholinergic potential: 80.2% (ADS) and 73.4% (ACB), respectively. An increasing ADS and German ACB score was associated with reduced cognitive function according to the LDST (-0.26; p=0.008 and -0.24; p=0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Multimorbid elderly patients are in a high risk for using anticholinergic drugs according to ADS and German ACB score. We especially need to gain greater awareness for the contribution of drugs with low anticholinergic potential from the cardiovascular system. As anticholinergic drug use is associated with reduced cognitive function in multimorbid elderly patients, the importance of rational prescribing and also deprescribing needs to be further evaluated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN89818205.

Quality of anticholinergic burden scales and their impact on clinical outcomes: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Older people are at risk of anticholinergic side effects due to changes affecting drug elimination and higher sensitivity to drug's side effects. Anticholinergic burden scales (ABS) were developed to quantify the anticholinergic drug burden (ADB). We aim to identify all published ABS, to compare them systematically and to evaluate their associations with clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search in MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify all published ABS and a Web of Science citation (WoS) analysis to track validation studies implying clinical outcomes. Quality of the ABS was assessed using an adapted AGREE II tool. For the validation studies, we used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane tool Rob2.0. The validation studies were categorized into six evidence levels based on the propositions of the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine with respect to their quality. At least two researchers independently performed screening and quality assessments.

RESULTS

Out of 1297 records, we identified 19 ABS and 104 validations studies. Despite differences in quality, all ABS were recommended for use. The anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB) scale and the German anticholinergic burden scale (GABS) achieved the highest percentage in quality. Most ABS are validated, yet validation studies for newer scales are lacking. Only two studies compared eight ABS simultaneously. The four most investigated clinical outcomes delirium, cognition, mortality and falls showed contradicting results.

CONCLUSION

There is need for good quality validation studies comparing multiple scales to define the best scale and to conduct a meta-analysis for the assessment of their clinical impact.

Are Anticholinergic Symptoms a Risk Factor for Falls in Older General Practice Patients With Polypharmacy? Study Protocol for the Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model

Background: Cumulative anticholinergic exposure, also known as anticholinergic burden, is associated with a variety of adverse outcomes. However, studies show that anticholinergic effects tend to be underestimated by prescribers, and anticholinergics are the most frequently prescribed potentially inappropriate medication in older patients. The grading systems and drugs included in existing scales to quantify anticholinergic burden differ considerably and do not adequately account for patients’ susceptibility to medications. Furthermore, their ability to link anticholinergic burden with adverse outcomes such as falls is unclear. This study aims to develop a prognostic model that predicts falls in older general practice patients, to assess the performance of several anticholinergic burden scales, and to quantify the added predictive value of anticholinergic symptoms in this context.

Methods: Data from two cluster-randomized controlled trials investigating medication optimization in older general practice patients in Germany will be used. One trial (RIME, n = 1,197) will be used for the model development and the other trial (PRIMUM, n = 502) will be used to externally validate the model. A priori, candidate predictors will be selected based on a literature search, predictor availability, and clinical reasoning. Candidate predictors will include socio-demographics (e.g. age, sex), morbidity (e.g. single conditions), medication (e.g. polypharmacy, anticholinergic burden as defined by scales), and well-being (e.g. quality of life, physical function). A prognostic model including sociodemographic and lifestyle-related factors, as well as variables on morbidity, medication, health status, and well-being, will be developed, whereby the prognostic value of extending the model to include additional patient-reported symptoms will be also assessed. Logistic regression will be used for the binary outcome, which will be defined as “no falls” vs. “≥1 fall” within six months of baseline, as reported in patient interviews.

Discussion: As the ability of different anticholinergic burden scales to predict falls in older patients is unclear, this study may provide insights into their relative importance as well as into the overall contribution of anticholinergic symptoms and other patient characteristics. The results may support general practitioners in their clinical decision-making and in prescribing fewer medications with anticholinergic properties.

Comparative associations between anticholinergic burden and emergency department visits for anticholinergic adverse events in older Korean adults: a nested case-control study using national claims data for validation of a novel country-specific scale

BACKGROUND

Considering the limited generalizability of previous anticholinergic burden scales, the Korean Anticholinergic Burden Scale (KABS) as a scale specific to the Korean population was developed. We aimed to validate the KABS by detecting the associations between high anticholinergic burden, measured with the KABS, and emergency department (ED) visits compared to the pre-existing validated scales in older Korean adults.

METHODS

A nested case-control study was conducted using national claims data. The cases included the first anticholinergic ED visits between July 1 and December 31, 2016. Anticholinergic ED visits were defined as ED visits with a primary diagnosis of constipation, delirium, dizziness, fall, fracture, or urinary retention. Propensity score-matched controls were identified. Average daily AB scores during 30 days before the index date were measured. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 461,034 were included. The highest proportion of those with high AB was identified with KABS (5.0%). Compared with those who had a KABS score of 0, older adults with a score ≥ 3 were at higher risk for overall anticholinergic ED visits (aOR, 1.62, 95% CI, 1.53-1.72), as well as visits for falls/fractures (aOR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.40-1.69), dizziness (aOR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.30-1.59), delirium (aOR: 2.96, 95% CI: 2.28-3.83), constipation (aOR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.68-2.02), and urinary retention (aOR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.79-2.55). High AB by KABS showed a stronger association with overall anticholinergic ED visits and visits due to delirium and urinary retention than those by other scales.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, KABS is superior to pre-existing scales in identifying patients with high AB and predicting high AB-related ED visits in older Korean adults.

Anticholinergic Drug Burden and Delirium: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between anticholinergic drug burden (ADB), measured with anticholinergic drug scales, and delirium and delirium severity.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

All available studies.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar. Studies evaluating the association between ADB (measured as a total score) and delirium or delirium severity, published in English, were eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies, including 148,756 persons, were included. Fifteen studies investigated delirium. ADB was measured with the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS, n = 5), the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale (ACB, n = 6), the list of Chew (n = 1), the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS, n = 5), a modified version of the ARS (n = 1), and a modified version of the ACB (n = 1). A high ADB, measured with the ARS, was associated with delirium (5/5). Also with the modified version of the ARS and ACB, an association was found between a high ADB and delirium during 3-month (1/1) and 1-year follow-up (1/1), respectively. When ADB was assessed with other scales, the results were inconclusive, with only 1 positive association for the ACB (1/6) and ADS (1/5) each. The possible association between ADB and delirium severity has also been investigated (ADS n = 2, Summers Drug Risk Number n = 1). One study found an association between a high ADB, measured with the ADS, and an increase in severity of delirium.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

ADB assessed with the ARS is consistently associated with delirium. The association found between the modified versions of the ARS and ACB and delirium needs confirmation. When ADB was assessed with other scales, the findings were inconclusive. The current findings suggest that the ARS might be a useful tool to identify patients at increased risk for delirium.

Association between anticholinergic burden and anticholinergic adverse outcomes in the elderly: Pharmacological basis of their predictive value for adverse outcomes

The use of anticholinergic drugs and other drugs with anticholinergic activity is highly prevalent in older people. Cumulative anticholinergic effects, known as anticholinergic burden, are associated with important peripheral and central adverse effects and outcomes. Several methods have been developed to quantify anticholinergic burden and to estimate the risk of adverse anticholinergic effects. Serum anticholinergic activity (SAA) and anticholinergic burden scoring systems are the most commonly used methods to predict the occurrence of important negative outcomes. These tools could guide clinicians in making more rational prescriptions to enhance patient safety, especially in older people. However, the literature has reported conflicting results about the predictive ability of these tools. The majority of these instruments ignore relevant pharmacologic aspects such as the doses used, differential muscarinic receptor subtype affinities, and blood-brain barrier permeability. To increase the clinical relevance of these tools, mechanistic and clinical pharmacology should collaborate. This narrative review describes the rational and pharmacological basis of anticholinergic burden tools and provides insight about their predictive value for adverse outcomes.

Quality of anticholinergic burden scales and their impact on clinical outcomes: a systematic review

Purpose

Older people are at risk of anticholinergic side effects due to changes affecting drug elimination and higher sensitivity to drug’s side effects. Anticholinergic burden scales (ABS) were developed to quantify the anticholinergic drug burden (ADB). We aim to identify all published ABS, to compare them systematically and to evaluate their associations with clinical outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a literature search in MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify all published ABS and a Web of Science citation (WoS) analysis to track validation studies implying clinical outcomes. Quality of the ABS was assessed using an adapted AGREE II tool. For the validation studies, we used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane tool Rob2.0. The validation studies were categorized into six evidence levels based on the propositions of the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine with respect to their quality. At least two researchers independently performed screening and quality assessments.

Results

Out of 1297 records, we identified 19 ABS and 104 validations studies. Despite differences in quality, all ABS were recommended for use. The anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB) scale and the German anticholinergic burden scale (GABS) achieved the highest percentage in quality. Most ABS are validated, yet validation studies for newer scales are lacking. Only two studies compared eight ABS simultaneously. The four most investigated clinical outcomes delirium, cognition, mortality and falls showed contradicting results.

Conclusion

There is need for good quality validation studies comparing multiple scales to define the best scale and to conduct a meta-analysis for the assessment of their clinical impact.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-020-02994-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Size of the associations between anticholinergic burden tool scores and adverse outcomes in older patients

Background Several anticholinergic scales and equations to evaluate the anticholinergic burden have been previously created. Association of these instruments with the anticholinergic outcomes are usually estimated by means of hypothesis contrast tests, which ignore the size of the association effect. Objective To evaluate the effect size of the associations between the scores on cumulative anticholinergic burden instruments with peripheral or central anticholinergic adverse outcomes in older patients. Setting Internal medicine ward of a Tertiary University Hospital. Methods A case-control study was conducted in patients over 65 years who were admitted to two internal medicine wards of a Portuguese university hospital. The Anticholinergic Drug Scale, Anticholinergic Risk Scale, Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale and Drug Burden Index were used to calculate the patients' anticholinergic burden. Peripheral (dry mouth-swab technique; dry eye-Schirmer test) and central (falls and cognitive impairment-Mini-Mental State Examination) anticholinergic adverse outcomes were investigated. The Barthel Index was used to assess overall physical functionality. The Mann-Whitney test was used to evaluate probabilistic differences in the anticholinergic scores between case and control individuals. To establish the effect size of the associations, the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristics curve was calculated. Main outcome measure Anticholinergic adverse effects. Results A total of 250 patients (mean age 81.67 years, standard deviation 7.768; 50% females) were included. In total, 148 patients (59.2%) presented with dry mouth, 85 (34%) with dry eye, 141 (56.4%) with impaired functionality, 44 (17.6%) with a history of falls and 219 (87.6%) with cognitive impairment. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were obtained for the majority of the associations between Anticholinergic Drug Scale, Anticholinergic Risk Scale, Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden and Drug Burden Index and adverse effects. Conversely, the effect sizes of these associations ranged from "fail" (area under the curve 0.5 to 0.6) to "fair" (area under the curve 0.7 to 0.8). Conclusion Although significant differences in the scores of anticholinergic burden instruments and adverse outcomes may exist, the effect sizes of these associations ranged from 'fail' to 'fair', which limits their utility in preventing anticholinergic adverse outcomes with medication review interventions.

Baseline anticholinergic burden from medications predicts poorer baseline and long-term health-related quality of life in 16 675 men and women of EPIC-Norfolk prospective population-based cohort study

PURPOSE

Previous studies investigating the association between anticholinergic burden (ACB) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) showed conflicting results and focused on older adults or specific patient groups only.

METHODS

Participants from the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer-Norfolk study were divided into three groups according to their ACB from medications at baseline, representing ACB scores of 0, 1 and ≥2. Outcomes of interest were the physical and mental component summary scores (PCS and MCS) of the Short Form-36, collected at 18 months from the baseline and again after a mean 13 years of follow-up. Linear regression and logistic regression for cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between ACB and HRQoL were constructed adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 16 675 participants, mean age 58.9 ± 9.1 years (55.6% female) and 7133 participants, mean age at follow-up 69.1 ± 8.7 years (56.8% female), were included in the cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, respectively. In cross-sectional analysis, higher anticholinergic burden was associated with higher odds of being in the lowest quartile of PCS (ACB = 1; OR, 1.85[1.64, 2.09] and ACB ≥ 2:2.19[1.85, 2.58] and MCS (ACB = 1:1.47[1.30, 1.66] and ACB ≥ 2:1.68[1.42, 1.98]). In longitudinal analysis, higher anticholinergic burden was similarly associated with higher odds of being in the lowest quartile of PCS (ACB = 1:1.56[1.24, 1.95] and ACB ≥ 2:1.48[1.07, 2.03]) compared with ACB 0 group. The association with MCS scores did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

The use of anticholinergic medications is associated with both short and long-term poorer physical functions but association with mental functioning appears more short-term.

Anticholinergic burden, oral hygiene practices, and oral hygiene status-cross-sectional findings from the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966

Objectives

To study the association between anticholinergic burden and oral hygiene practices and oral hygiene status among 46-year-old people.

Materials and methods

The study included 1945 participants from the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 (NFBC1966), who had a complete dental status. The participants underwent clinical medical and dental examinations, and their medication data were gathered by combining self-reported drug use with information from the National Prescription Register. Anticholinergic burden was measured using nine previously published anticholinergic scales. Oral hygiene practices were assessed with toothbrushing frequency and oral hygiene status with the presence of visible dental plaque. Poisson regression with robust variance estimation and negative binomial regression models were used to estimate relative risks (RR).

Results

Thirty percent of the participants reported brushing their teeth twice a day and about 25% of their teeth had dental plaque on them. Fifteen percent of the participants used at least one anticholinergic drug or had an anticholinergic burden according to the nine anticholinergic scales. After adjustments for confounding factors, the RRs of anticholinergic burden varied between 0.95 and 1.11 for toothbrushing frequency. Anticholinergic burden (according to Anticholinergic Activity Scale, Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden, Chew’s scale) was associated statistically significantly with the number of teeth with dental plaque. For the three scales, RRs varied from 1.24 to 1.50.

Conclusions

Anticholinergic burden associated with poor oral hygiene.

Clinical relevance

The findings stress the importance of providing oral hygiene instructions and prophylactic measures to patients taking anticholinergic drugs.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00784-020-03485-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Assessing Risks of Polypharmacy Involving Medications With Anticholinergic Properties

PURPOSE

Anticholinergic burden (ACB), the cumulative effect of anticholinergic medications, is associated with adverse outcomes in older people but is less studied in middle-aged populations. Numerous scales exist to quantify ACB. The aims of this study were to quantify ACB in a large cohort using the 10 most common anticholinergic scales, to assess the association of each scale with adverse outcomes, and to assess overlap in populations identified by each scale.

METHODS

We performed a longitudinal analysis of the UK Biobank community cohort (502,538 participants, baseline age: 37-73 years, median years of follow-up: 6.2). The ACB was calculated at baseline using 10 scales. Baseline data were linked to national mortality register records and hospital episode statistics. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, MACE, hospital admission for fall/fracture, and hospital admission with dementia/delirium. Cox proportional hazards models (hazard ratio [HR], 95% CI) quantified associations between ACB scales and outcomes adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol use, physical activity, and morbidity count.

RESULTS

Anticholinergic medication use varied from 8% to 17.6% depending on the scale used. For the primary outcome, ACB was significantly associated with all-cause mortality/MACE for each scale. The Anticholinergic Drug Scale was most strongly associated with mortality/MACE (HR = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.11-1.14 per 1-point increase in score). The ACB was significantly associated with all secondary outcomes. The Anticholinergic Effect on Cognition scale was most strongly associated with dementia/delirium (HR = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.3-1.61 per 1-point increase).

CONCLUSIONS

The ACB was associated with adverse outcomes in a middle- to older-aged population. Populations identified and effect size differed between scales. Scale choice influenced the population identified as potentially requiring reduction in ACB in clinical practice or intervention trials.

Anticholinergic Drugs and Oral Health-related Quality of Life in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore, in a sample population of people with schizophrenia (PWS), the role of the anticholinergic burden on the perception of oral health-related quality of life (OHrQoL) in France.

METHODS

A pilot study was performed between March 2014 and January 2016. PWS were recruited from a population in Côte d'Or department in France. Dental status was investigated using the Decayed, Missing, or Filled Teeth (DMFT) index, the Xerostomia Index (XI), and the Global Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) for OHrQoL. The anticholinergic impregnation score was recorded using the anticholinergic impregnation scale (AIS).

RESULTS

A sample of 62 people was selected. The DMFT score was 16.5± 8.7, the XI score was 22.9±7.8, the GOHAI score was 43.0±8.8, and the AIS score was 3.1±2.8. In total, 169 drugs were prescribed to the people of our sample, and 114 different anticholinergic drugs were observed. The most frequently used anticholinergic drugs (51.40%), in the study had a low antimuscarinic potency (1 point according to AIS scale). The multiple linear regression model showed that the OHrQoL scores were significantly lower when the DMFT scores, XI score, and anticholinergic scores were high.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study highlighted the potential role of the anticholinergic burden on the OHrQoL of PWS. A study with a validated specific scale for the OHrQoL and a standard anticholinergic burden scale should be conducted to clarify the role of anticholinergic drugs on the OHrQoL for PWS.

The Relationship Between Anticholinergic Exposure and Falls, Fractures, and Mortality in Patients with Overactive Bladder

BACKGROUND

Understanding risk factors associated with falls is important for optimizing care and quality of life for older patients.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to determine the relationship between anticholinergic exposure and falls, fractures, and all-cause mortality.

METHODS

An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted using administrative claims data from 1 January 2007 to 30 September 2015. Individuals aged 65-89 years newly diagnosed or treated for overactive bladder (OAB) were identified. Index date was the first OAB diagnosis or OAB medication prescription claim. Follow-up began on the index date and continued until death, disenrollment, or end of study period. The Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale was used to define and quantify daily anticholinergic exposure and intensity. The primary study outcome was a combined endpoint of falls or fractures. All-cause mortality was a secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

There were 113,311 patients with mean age of 74.8 ± standard deviation (SD) 6.2 years included. Current anticholinergic exposure was associated with a 1.28-fold increased hazard of a fall/fracture (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-1.32) compared with unexposed person-time, and past exposure was associated with a 1.14-fold increased hazard of a fall/fracture (95% CI 1.12-1.17). Compared with unexposed person-time, low-, moderate-, and high-intensity anticholinergic exposure was associated with a 1.04-fold (95% CI 1.00-1.07), 1.13-fold (95% CI 1.09-1.17), and 1.31-fold (95% CI 1.26-1.36) increased hazard of falls/fractures, respectively. A similar pattern was observed for all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticholinergic exposure is associated with an increased risk of falls or fractures in older patients and is an important consideration when evaluating treatment options for such patients with OAB.

Anticholinergic burden and fractures: a protocol for a methodological systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Medications with anticholinergic activity are used in the treatment of many diseases common in old age, including depression, psychosis, Parkinson's disease, allergies, pain and urinary incontinence. A high anticholinergic burden (ACB) is considered a major risk factor for fractures in older adults but recent studies reported inconsistent results. These inconsistencies may partly be due to differences in methodological aspects. However, no systematic review so far has addressed this association and considered study methods. Thus, we aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies addressing the association of ACB with fractures and to provide a methodological appraisal of the included studies.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Science Citation Index, CENTRAL and grey literature using a strategy that combines the terms anticholinergic and fractures. We will hand search reference lists of articles. Two reviewers will independently screen all identified abstracts for eligibility and evaluate the risk of bias of the included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and RTI item bank. Discrepancies will be resolved by consensus or consultation with a third researcher. We will conduct a meta-analysis, either for the overall population or for specific and more homogeneous subgroups, if the number of studies retrieved and their heterogeneity allows it.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethics approval will be sought, as no original data will be collected for this review. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018116737.

Development of an Anticholinergic Burden Scale specific for Korean older adults

AIM

The aim of this study was to develop the Korean Anticholinergic Burden Scale through assessment of previously developed tools, a literature review and a modified Delphi process.

METHODS

We carried out a systematic review to identify previously published anticholinergic burden tools. A composite medication list was made by extracting medications and their quantitative grading from the existing tools, after excluding the medications not distributed in Korea and topical agents. We also added medications available in Korea that had not been rated. For medications with conflicting anticholinergic scores or no anticholinergic score, we determined the final score from 0 ("no anticholinergic effect") to 3 ("strong anticholinergic effect") with a literature review and expert consensus through a two-round Delphi process.

RESULTS

A composite list of 655 medications with anticholinergic scores was extracted from 10 existing tools. A total of 38 medications available in Korea were added to the list. A total of 494 medications were deemed suitable for a Korean-specific scale. We confirmed the anticholinergic scores of 352 medications from existing scales, and 142 underwent the Delphi process. The final scores graded by experts showed high reliability among experts with an intra-class correlation of 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.97-0.98). Finally, 56 medications were categorized as strong anticholinergics, 23 as moderate, 59 as weak and 356 as having no anticholinergic activity.

CONCLUSIONS

This newly created consensus-driven anticholinergic burden scale designed specifically for the Korean healthcare system might be a practical tool for assessing anticholinergic burden in older adults with polypharmacy in routine medication reviews and in research. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 628-634.

Anticholinergic Burden and Dry Mouth in Middle-Aged People

INTRODUCTION

Anticholinergic burden refers to the cumulative effect of taking 1 or more drugs with anticholinergic properties. At the moment, little is known about the association between the anticholinergic burden and dry mouth.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this article was to study, whether an anticholinergic burden is associated with dry mouth among middle-aged people.

METHODS

The study population included 1,345 people aged 46 y from the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 (NFBC1966) study, who took part in a clinical medical and dental examination during 2012-2013. Medication data comprised both self-reported drug use and information obtained from the national register. Anticholinergic burden was measured using 10 different anticholinergic scales. Dry mouth was defined on the basis of having either a subjective feeling of dry mouth (xerostomia) or objectively measured low unstimulated or stimulated whole salivary flow rates (hyposalivation). Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used to estimate relative risk (RR). Regression models were adjusted for sex, smoking, diabetes, rheumatoid diseases, depressive symptoms, anxiety, total number of drugs, and antihypertensive drugs.

RESULTS

Approximately 14% of the participants reported having xerostomia and about 2% had hyposalivation. The RRs of different anticholinergic scales for xerostomia varied from 1.05 to 1.68. The scales' RRs were between 0.89 and 2.03 for low unstimulated whole salivary flow (<0.1 mL/min) and between 0.59 and 1.80 for low stimulated whole salivary flow (<0.7 mL/min). Seven of 10 studied anticholinergic scales associated statistically significantly with dry mouth, either with xerostomia or hyposalivation.

CONCLUSION

Most of the anticholinergic scales were associated with dry mouth, either with xerostomia or hyposalivation. There was considerable variation in the strength of the associations between anticholinergic scales and dry mouth.

KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT

The findings of this study suggest that dentists should take notice of the use of drugs with anticholinergic properties and their harmful effects among middle-aged people. Dentists should provide these patients with necessary guidance on how to cope with dry mouth and give them prophylactic measures against oral diseases associated with dry mouth.

Anticholinergic exposure and cognitive decline in older adults: effect of anticholinergic exposure definitions in a 3-year analysis of the multidomain Alzheimer preventive trial (MAPT) study

AIM

The aim of the present study was to assess the association between anticholinergic (atropinic) burden and cognitive decline in older adults over the course of 3 years.

METHODS

We used data from Multidomain Alzheimer Preventive Trial (MAPT) study participants aged ≥70 years and at risk of cognitive decline. Cognitive function was assessed with a composite score [Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) orientation, Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test, Category Naming Test, Digit Symbol Substitution Test] at 12, 24 and 36 months. Participants declining by more than 0.236 points on the composite score (representing the lowest quintile of 1-year cognitive change) during any 1-year period were considered to have undergone cognitive decline. Anticholinergic exposure was defined by four methods for each of four anticholinergic scales (Anticholinergic Drug Scale, Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden, Anticholinergic Risk Scale, the Durán list). The association between cognitive decline and time-varying anticholinergic exposure [primary analysis using the Durán list and maximal anticholinergic score (0, 1 or 3)] was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. Other cognitive decline definitions were used in sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

At baseline, among 1396 patients included, 7.4-23.5% were exposed to anticholinergic agents, depending on the anticholinergic scale used. Sixty-four per cent of participants experienced cognitive decline during follow-up. Regardless of the anticholinergic scale/exposure measurement used, no significant association was observed with cognitive decline {primary analysis: compared with non-anticholinergic agent users, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.14 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.95, 1.38] for anticholinergic score = 1; HR = 0.92 [95% CI = 0.65, 1.30] for score = 3}. Results were stable in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

We found no significant association between anticholinergic exposure and cognitive decline in older adults using anticholinergic scales and definitions of exposure.

An anticholinergic burden score for German prescribers: score development

Background

Anticholinergic drugs put elderly patients at a higher risk for falls, cognitive decline, and delirium as well as peripheral adverse reactions like dry mouth or constipation. Prescribers are often unaware of the drug-based anticholinergic burden (ACB) of their patients. This study aimed to develop an anticholinergic burden score for drugs licensed in Germany to be used by clinicians at prescribing level.

Methods

A systematic literature search in pubmed assessed previously published ACB tools. Quantitative grading scores were extracted, reduced to drugs available in Germany, and reevaluated by expert discussion. Drugs were scored as having no, weak, moderate, or strong anticholinergic effects. Further drugs were identified in clinical routine and included as well.

Results

The literature search identified 692 different drugs, with 548 drugs available in Germany. After exclusion of drugs due to no systemic effect or scoring of drug combinations (n = 67) and evaluation of 26 additional identified drugs in clinical routine, 504 drugs were scored. Of those, 356 drugs were categorised as having no, 104 drugs were scored as weak, 18 as moderate and 29 as having strong anticholinergic effects.

Conclusions

The newly created ACB score for drugs authorized in Germany can be used in daily clinical practice to reduce potentially inappropriate medications for elderly patients. Further clinical studies investigating its effect on reducing anticholinergic side effects are necessary for validation.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-018-0929-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Anticholinergic drug use and cognitive performances in middle age: findings from the CONSTANCES cohort

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown associations between the use of anticholinergics (AC) and cognitive performance in the elderly, considering AC as a homogeneous set of drugs. The present study aims to assess the relationship between exposure to AC drugs and cognitive performance in middle-aged adults according to AC potency and drug class.

METHODS

Our cross-sectional study used baseline data of 34 267 participants aged 45-70 from the Consultants des centres d'examen de santé de la sécurité sociale (CONSTANCES) cohort. The cumulative exposure to AC was measured using national reimbursement databases over the 3-year period preceding assessment of cognitive performance. Eight classes of AC drugs were differentiated. Episodic verbal memory, language abilities and executive functions were evaluated by validated neuropsychological tests. Analyses were controlled on lifestyle and health status variables.

RESULTS

This study showed a negative association between overall cumulative AC exposure and cognitive performances after adjustment. The use of drugs with possible AC effect according to the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale (ACB-1 score) was only associated with executive functions. Analyses of AC exposure across drug classes showed a negative association between the use of AC antipsychotics and all cognitive functions assessed. Heterogeneous associations were found for the use of AC anxiolytics, AC opioids and AC drugs targeting the gastrointestinal tract or metabolism. We did not find significant associations between the use of antihistamines, antidepressants, cardiovascular system or other AC medications and cognitive function.

CONCLUSION

Association between AC drugs and cognitive performance was highly heterogeneous across drug classes; this heterogeneity will have to be considered by future studies.

Measuring anticholinergic exposure in patients with dementia: A comparative study of nine anticholinergic risk scales

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence and concordance of anticholinergic exposure according to 9 published scales, to quantify the relative weight of the drug subtypes included in each scale, and to identify clinical variables related to anticholinergic exposure.

METHODS

Observational and cross-sectional study using 5323 cases of dementia diagnosed in the 7 hospitals of the public health care system of the Health Region of Girona (Spain) between 2007 and 2014 and registered by the Registry of Dementias of Girona (ReDeGi). We used the Pharmacy database that includes all the drugs prescribed by specialist and primary care physicians and dispensed in pharmacies. We calculated the anticholinergic exposure using the scoring rules of each scale. Age, gender, place of residence, dementia subtype, Clinical Dementia Rating score, Mini-Mental Status Examination score, and Blessed Dementia Rating Score at the moment of dementia diagnose were retrieved from the ReDeGi.

RESULTS

Prevalence of the annual anticholinergic exposure ranged from 36.3% to 69.0% according to the different scales, the concordance among scales was poor to moderate, and the central nervous system drugs accounted the most for anticholinergic exposure. Being in a nursing home, having depressive symptoms, having a non-Alzheimer's dementia subtype, the number of drug treatments, and the severity of dementia were main determinants of anticholinergic exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a large difference in outcomes among the 9 anticholinergic risk scales. Clinicians and researchers should be aware of these differences when using these instruments in patients with dementia.

[Atropinic burden and anticholinergic drugs: Interest and application in clinical practice in the elderly]

Anticholinergic drugs (also called antimuscarinics or atropinics) increase the risk of falls, cognitive impairment and/or mortality in older patients. These drugs belong to the lists of potentially inappropriate medications in the elderly. The aim of this review was to present and discuss the different tools available to measure the atropinic risk in drug exposure of older patients. Several scales, developed from biological and/or clinical criteria, allow to classify anticholinergic drugs according to their atropinic potency and to assign to them an atropinic burden. Total atropinic burden of patient drug exposure can be calculated as the sum of atropinic score of each drug. Other tools include drug daily doses to better estimate the atropinic risk. These different methods are a precious help to decrease atropinic exposure in the elderly. Nevertheless, they have to be considered as upgradable and it is necessary to adapt them regularly according to the introduction of new drugs in clinical practice.

Association Between Anticholinergic Drug Use and Health-Related Quality of Life in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

BACKGROUND

The use of drugs with anticholinergic properties (AC drugs) has been associated with decreased functioning and impaired cognition in older adults. Studies assessing the association between AC-drug use and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) show conflicting results.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to evaluate the association between AC-drug use and HRQoL in community-dwelling older adults.

METHODS

The NuAge cohort study enrolled 1793 men and women aged 68-82 years. The participants were free of disabilities in activities of daily living, not cognitively impaired at recruitment and followed annually for 3 years (December 2003-May 2005). AC-drug exposure was assessed using the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale (ACBS). HRQoL was assessed using the physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summaries of the 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36) questionnaire. The association between AC drug and HRQoL was determined by a mixed model analysis using four annual time points.

RESULTS

At recruitment the mean age was 74.4 ± 4.2 years, 52% were female and 33% of participants were prescribed at least one AC drug. The mean PCS and MCS (/100) scores were 49.0 ± 8.2 and 54.9 ± 8.1, respectively. In the mixed model analysis, an increase of 1 on the ACBS was associated with a decrease of -0.50 (95% CI -0.68 to -0.31) in the PCS and an increase of 0.19 (95% CI 0.01-0.37) in the MCS.

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of generally healthy community-dwelling older adults, AC-drug exposure was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the PCS and increase in the MCS throughout the entire follow-up period. However, the effects on the PCS and MCS were small and likely not clinically relevant.

Patterns of drug prescriptions in an orthogeriatric ward as compared to orthopaedic ward: results from the Trondheim Hip Fracture Trial-a randomised clinical trial

Purpose

In the Trondheim Hip Fracture Trial, 397 home-dwelling patients with hip fractures were randomised to comprehensive geriatric care (CGC) in a geriatric ward or traditional orthopaedic care (OC). Patients in the CGC group had significantly better mobility and function 4 months after discharge. This study explores group differences in drug prescribing and possible associations with the outcomes in the main study.

Methods

Drugs prescribed at admission and discharge were registered from hospital records. Mobility, function, fear of falling and quality of life were assessed using specific rating scales. Linear regression was used to analyse association between drug changes and outcomes at 4 months.

Results

The mean age was 83 years, and 74% were females. The mean number (± SD) of drugs in the CGC and OC groups was 3.8 (2.8) and 3.9 (2.8) at inclusion and 7.1 (2.8) and 6.2 (3.0) at discharge, respectively (p = 0.003). The total number of withdrawals was 209 and 82 in the CGC and OC groups, respectively (p < 0.0001), and the number of starts was 844 and 526, respectively (p < 0.0001). A significant negative association was found between the number of drug changes during the hospital stay and mobility and function 4 months later in both groups. However, this association disappeared when adjusting for baseline function and comorbidities.

Conclusion

These secondary analyses suggest that there are significant differences in the pharmacological treatment between geriatric and orthopaedic wards, but these differences could not explain the beneficial effect of CGC in the Trondheim Hip Fracture Trial.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-017-2263-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Comparison of Nine Instruments to Calculate Anticholinergic Load in a Large Cohort of Older Outpatients: Association with Cognitive and Functional Decline, Falls, and Use of Laxatives

OBJECTIVE

A patient's risk for anticholinergic adverse effects is frequently estimated by instruments evaluating the drugs included in his medication profile. It remains unknown, however, which characteristics should be included in such an assessment instrument aiming to reliably predict adverse anticholinergic outcomes.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

ESTHER cohort (Germany).

PARTICIPANTS

Home-dwelling participants (N = 2,761) aged between 60 and 87 years.

MEASUREMENTS

The association between anticholinergic load calculated with nine different instruments and four anticholinergic adverse outcomes was investigated in univariate and multivariate analyses. Therefore, linear models complemented with Kendall's tau rank correlation coefficients (ԏ) were applied for continuous outcomes and generalized linear models were used to derive odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for binary endpoints.

RESULTS

Based on the respective identification criteria for anticholinergic drugs, the nine instruments identified between 245 (9%) and 866 (31%) anticholinergic drug users (mean age ± SD: 73 ± 6 years; Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score: 28.3 ± 2.07; Barthel Index: 97.1 ± 7.5; 291 reporting falls; 29 taking laxatives [surrogate for constipation]). In the multivariate analysis, only two instruments indicated a significant association between anticholinergic load and all four outcomes. The instrument considering the prescribed dose showed the strongest association with MMSE scores (ԏ = -0.10), falls (OR: 2.30; 95% CI: 1.50-3.52), and the use of laxatives (OR: 3.11; 95% CI: 1.04-9.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Instruments most reliably predicted anticholinergicadverse events if they were either based on the drugs' serum anticholinergic activity and the suggestions of clinician experts or considered the actual prescribed dose.

An improved, high-efficiency assay for assessing serum anticholinergic activity using cultured cells stably expressing M1 receptors

Assessments of total anticholinergic activity (SAA) in serum are of considerable interest for its potential involvement in cognitive impairment associated with polydrug states in the elderly and other populations. Such estimations have been based on the displacement of radioligand binding in rat brain tissues. The validity of such measurements has been questioned, as a potentially distorting effect of large serum proteins was identified. We sought to develop a modified assay that would be more efficient and free of this potential confound. Cultured CHO cells stably expressing M1 receptors M1WT3 were used. Binding of ³H-radioligands was conducted in 96-well plates and tested in serum containing known amounts of anticholinergic medications. Effects of endogenous serum proteins were assessed by pre-assay filtration and also by deproteinization with perchloric acid (PCA). Binding of [³H]quinuclidinyl benzilate ([³H]QNB) or [³H]N-methyl-scopolamine ([³H]NMS) to M1WT3 cells proved reliable and equally sensitive to varying concentrations of anticholinergic agents. In agreement with previous findings (Cox, Kwatra, Shetty, & Kwatra, 2009), filtration of proteins heavier than 50kDa essentially reduced SAA values to zero. In contrast, PCA preserved more than 70% of the binding seen untreated cell membranes. Cell-based assays also showed significant signal increases compared to the conventional rat brain-based protocol. Further advantages of the cell-based protocol described here include increased sensitivity and reliability, smaller amounts of radioligand needed, and higher throughput. PCA pretreatment eliminates potential artifacts attributable to serum proteins. This step, together with improvements in efficiency, should contribute significantly to the usefulness of the assay.

Anticholinergic burden and cognitive function in a large German cohort of hospitalized geriatric patients

PURPOSE

Previous studies suggest an association between use of anticholinergic drugs in elderly patients and cognitive impairment. However, there are still limited data on the association of anticholinergic drug use and cognitive impairment as well as contribution of individual drugs to anticholinergic load using large, well-documented patient cohorts treated in geriatric units from Europe.

METHODS

We investigated 797,440 prescriptions to 89,579 hospitalized patients treated in geriatric units within the GiB-DAT database. Data of all patients discharged between 1 January 2013 and 30 June 2015 was included. The Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale was used to classify anticholinergic drugs as definite (score 2 or 3) and possible anticholinergics (score 1). Cognitive function was determined using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the standardized scale for dementia (4D+S).

RESULTS

In two multivariable logistic regression models age, sex, number of drugs and ACB total scores were identified as variables independently associated with cognitive impairment as measured by MMSE (odds ratio per ACB unit 1.114, 95% CI 1.099-1.130) or the diagnosis dementia (odds ratio 1.159 per ACB unit, 95% CI 1.144-1.173, both p < 0.0001). High anticholinergic load was associated with patients with severe cognitive impairment (p < 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons). ACB score 3 anticholinergic drugs contributed 77.9% to the cumulative amount of ACB points in patients with an anticholinergic load of 3 and higher.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a cross-sectional study design, a significant positive association between anticholinergic drug load and cognitive impairment in European patients treated in specialised geriatric units was found. The most frequently used definitve anticholinergic drugs were quetiapine, amitriptyline and carbamazepine.

Limitations of the Anticholinergic Activity Assay and Assay-Based Anticholinergic Drug Scales

OBJECTIVE

The anticholinergic activity (AA) assay is a common method to determine a patient's anticholinergic load. Several limitations, however, are expected when applying the AA assay to patients or using drug scales to estimate anticholinergic burden based on AA levels. This study aims to demonstrate common pitfalls in an experimental setting and outline their clinical consequences.

METHODS

The AA was analyzed for five drugs with reported interaction with muscarinic receptors. Concentration-response curves were constructed for furosemide (weak anticholinergic), diphenhydramine (moderate anticholinergic), the strong anticholinergic amitriptyline and its metabolite nortriptyline, and the cholinergic pilocarpine. The Combination Index (CI) was used to assess the interaction of three drug combinations with amitriptyline.

RESULTS

All compounds displaced the radioactive tracer from its receptor binding site in a concentration-dependent manner, and full displacement was reached for all compounds except furosemide (Emax 16%). The CI indicated that amitriptyline and thioridazine have antagonistic effects (CI = 1.46) at low and synergistic effects (CI = 0.88) at higher concentrations (p < 0.0001), whereas synergistic effects (CI = 0.47-0.48) were observed for amitriptyline in any concentration combined with pilocarpine (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

When the patient's anticholinergic load is estimated using AA levels, the actual exposure, combination of anticholinergic drugs, their active metabolites, and also drugs with an opposite pharmacologic action will contribute to AA levels, whereas weak anticholinergic drugs in therapeutic concentrations are rather negligible.

[Drug-drug interactions in the elderly : Which ones really matter?]

Pharmacotherapy in the elderly is challenging due to age-related physiological changes, high interindividual variability, and increasing frequency of multimorbidity. The resulting polypharmacy increases the risk of drug-drug interactions and requires an individual risk assessment. Some drug-drug interactions are documented to be associated with harm in older adults including intoxication, gastrointestinal bleeding, or falls. Therefore, they are considered to be of special importance in the elderly. Moreover, frequent risk factors and continuous physiological alterations in the elderly should be taken into account during risk assessment. This review exemplifies clinically relevant drug-drug interactions and risk factors in the elderly. In addition, assessment tools as well as prevention and management strategies for clinical practice are presented.

Associations between Anticholinergic Burden and Adverse Health Outcomes in Parkinson Disease

Background

Elderly adults should avoid medications with anticholinergic effects since they may increase the risk of adverse events, including falls, delirium, and cognitive impairment. However, data on anticholinergic burden are limited in subpopulations, such as individuals with Parkinson disease (PD). The objective of this study was to determine whether anticholinergic burden was associated with adverse outcomes in a PD inpatient population.

Methods

Using the Cerner Health Facts® database, we retrospectively examined anticholinergic medication use, diagnoses, and hospital revisits within a cohort of 16,302 PD inpatients admitted to a Cerner hospital between 2000 and 2011. Anticholinergic burden was computed using the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS). Primary outcomes were associations between ARS score and diagnosis of fracture and delirium. Secondary outcomes included associations between ARS score and 30-day hospital revisits.

Results

Many individuals (57.8%) were prescribed non-PD medications with moderate to very strong anticholinergic potential. Individuals with the greatest ARS score (≥4) were more likely to be diagnosed with fractures (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.56, 95% CI: 1.29–1.88) and delirium (AOR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.08–2.40) relative to those with no anticholinergic burden. Similarly, inpatients with the greatest ARS score were more likely to visit the emergency department (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 1.32, 95% CI: 1.10–1.58) and be readmitted (AHR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.01–1.33) within 30-days of discharge.

Conclusions

We found a positive association between increased anticholinergic burden and adverse outcomes among individuals with PD. Additional pharmacovigilance studies are needed to better understand risks associated with anticholinergic medication use in PD.