Comparison of plasma and oral fluid concentrations of mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide metabolite by LC-MS in kidney transplant patients

Can we Predict Drug Excretion into Saliva? A Systematic Review and Analysis of Physicochemical Properties

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Saliva is a patient-friendly matrix for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) but is infrequently used in routine care. This is due to the uncertainty of saliva-based TDM results to inform dosing. This study aimed to retrieve data on saliva-plasma concentration and subsequently determine the physicochemical properties that influence the excretion of drugs into saliva to increase the foundational knowledge underpinning saliva-based TDM.

METHODS

Medline, Web of Science and Embase (1974-2023) were searched for human clinical studies, which determined drug pharmacokinetics in both saliva and plasma. Studies with at least ten subjects and five paired saliva-plasma concentrations per subject were included. For each study, the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve between saliva and plasma was determined to assess excretion into saliva. Physicochemical properties of each drug (e.g. pKa, lipophilicity, molecular weight, polar surface area, rotatable bonds and fraction of drug unbound to plasma proteins) were obtained from PubChem and Drugbank. Drugs were categorised by their ionisability, after which saliva-to-plasma ratios were predicted with adjustment for protein binding and physiological pH via the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation. Spearman correlation analyses were performed for each drug category to identify factors predicting saliva excretion (α = 5%). Study quality was assessed by the risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions tool.

RESULTS

Overall, 42 studies including 40 drugs (anti-psychotics, anti-microbials, immunosuppressants, anti-thrombotic, anti-cancer and cardiac drugs) were included. The median saliva-to-plasma ratios were similar for drugs in the amphoteric (0.59), basic (0.43) and acidic (0.41) groups and lowest for drugs in the neutral group (0.21). Higher excretion of acidic drugs (n = 5) into saliva was associated with lower ionisation and protein binding (correlation between predicted versus observed saliva-to-plasma ratios: R2 = 0.85, p = 0.02). For basic drugs (n = 21), pKa predicted saliva excretion (Spearman correlation coefficient: R = 0.53, p = 0.02). For amphoteric drugs (n = 10), hydrogen bond donor (R = - 0.76, p = 0.01) and polar surface area (R = - 0.69, p = 0.02) were predictors. For neutral drugs (n = 10), protein binding (R = 0.84, p = 0.004), lipophilicity (R = - 0.65, p = 0.04) and hydrogen bond donor count (R = - 0.68, p = 0.03) were predictors. Drugs considered potentially suitable for saliva-based TDM are phenytoin, tacrolimus, voriconazole and lamotrigine. The studies had a low-to-moderate risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Many commonly used drugs are excreted into saliva, which can be partly predicted by a drug's ionisation state, protein binding, lipophilicity, hydrogen bond donor count and polar surface area. The contribution of drug transporters and physiological factors to the excretion needs to be evaluated. Continued research on drugs potentially suitable for saliva-based TDM will aid in adopting this person-centred TDM approach to improve patient outcomes.

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide determination in saliva samples from children with nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Saliva sampling is one of the methods of therapeutic drug monitoring for mycophenolic acid (MPA) and its metabolite, mycophenolic acid glucuronide (MPAG). The study describes the liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method developed for saliva MPA and MPAG determination in children with nephrotic syndrome.

METHODS

The mobile phase consisted of methanol and water at gradient flow, both with 0.1% formic acid. Firstly, 100 µL of saliva was evaporated at 45 °C for 2 h to dryness, secondly, it was reconstituted in the mobile phase, and finally 10 µL was injected into the LC-MS/MS system. Saliva from ten children with nephrotic syndrome treated with mycophenolate mofetil was collected with Salivette®.

RESULTS

For MPA and MPAG, within the 2-500 ng/mL range, the method was selective, specific, accurate and precise within-run and between-run. No carry-over and matrix effects were observed. Stability tests showed that MPA and MPAG were stable in saliva samples if stored for 2 h at room temperature, 18 h at 4 °C, and at least 5 months at - 80 °C as well as after three freeze-thaw cycles, in a dry extract for 16 h at 4 °C, and for 8 h at 15 °C in the autosampler. The analytes were not adsorbed onto Salivette® cotton swabs. For concentrations above 500 ng/mL, the samples may be diluted twofold. In children, saliva MPA and MPAG were within the ranges of 4.6-531.8 ng/mL and 10.7-183.7 ng/mL, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The evaluated LC-MS/MS method has met the validation requirements for saliva MPA and MPAG determination in children with nephrotic syndrome. Further studies are needed to explore plasma-saliva correlations and assess their potential contribution to MPA monitoring.

Comparison of immunoassay and LC-tandem mass spectrometry analyses of ractopamine in hog oral fluid

The accurate detection of ractopamine in food animals is crucial for marketing since some entities require animals or animal carcasses to be free of ractopamine residues. Field-based ractopamine screening tests that are rapid, sensitive, and capable of high-throughput are highly desirable to ensure that inadvertent exposure to ractopamine did not occur in animals marketed as animals that have not been fed ractopamine. An immunochemically based lateral flow assay was used to analyze oral fluids from hogs never exposed to ractopamine and from hogs that were presumed positives and results were confirmed using an enhanced sensitivity LC-MSMS method. We found that an immunochemically based lateral flow system having a working range of 2.5 to 15 ng mL-1 worked well as a screening assay with 1.7% false positive results in freshly collected hog oral fluids. Using ractopamine glucuronide standards and LC-MSMS, we determined that the false positive results were not due to the presence of ractopamine glucuronide metabolites in oral fluids.

High-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection for mycophenolic acid determination in saliva samples

BACKGROUND

For therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of mycophenolic acid (MPA), which is frequently proposed, saliva might be a suitable and easy-to-obtain biological matrix. The study aimed to validate an HPLC method with fluorescence detection for determining mycophenolic acid in saliva (sMPA) in children with nephrotic syndrome.

METHODS

The mobile phase was composed of methanol and tetrabutylammonium bromide with disodium hydrogen phosphate (pH 8.5) at a 48:52 ratio. To prepare the saliva samples, 100 µL of saliva, 50 µL of calibration standards, and 50 µL of levofloxacin (used as an internal standard) were mixed and evaporated to dryness at 45 °C for 2 h. The resulting dry extract was reconstituted in the mobile phase and injected into the HPLC system after centrifugation. Saliva samples from study participants were collected using Salivette^® devices.

RESULTS

The method was linear within the range of 5-2000 ng/mL, was selective with no carry-over effect and met the acceptance criteria for within-run and between-run accuracy and precision. Saliva samples can be stored for up to 2 h at room temperature, for up to 4 h at 4 °C, and for up to 6 months at - 80 °C. MPA was stable in saliva after three freeze-thaw cycles, in dry extract for 20 h at 4 °C, and for 4 h in the autosampler at room temperature. MPA recovery from Salivette^® cotton swabs was within the range of 94-105%. The sMPA concentrations in the two children with nephrotic syndrome who were treated with mycophenolate mofetil were within 5-112 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

The sMPA determination method is specific, selective, and meets the validation requirements for analytic methods. It may be used in children with nephrotic syndrome; however further studies are required to investigate focusing on sMPA and the correlation between sMPA and total MPA and its possible contribution to MPA TDM is required.

Utility of salivary mycophenolic acid concentration monitoring: Modeling and Monte Carlo validation approach

The results of the previous studies demonstrated an association between mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure, serum albumin level (ALB), and adverse effects in kidney transplant patients. The aim was the identification of mathematical correlation and association between both, total and unbound MPA concentration in relation to ALB, body mass (BM), age and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in stable kidney transplant recipients. Furthermore, investigation was conducted with the aim to clarify the role of salivary concentration (CSAL ) of MPA in adverse effect profile. In order to analyze the association between total and salivary concentration of MPA in relation to ALB, BM, age and eGFR, a least squares method for determining the correlation between these parameters was performed. In addition, derived mathematical model based on experimental data can also be performed and simulated through the Monte Carlo (MC) approach. Adverse effects were grouped according to the nature of symptoms and scored by a previously published validated system. Numerically calculated values of CSAL from the models [CSAL  = f(ALB, BM, age, eGFR, CP ) = a00  + a10 *(ALB, BM, age, eGFR) + a01 *CP ] were then compared with those from validation set of patients, where the best fitting model was for ALB [CSAL  = 54.96-1.64*ALB +13.4*CP ]. Adverse effects estimation showed the difference in esthetic score, positively correlated with CSAL in the lower ALB group (145.41 ± 219.02 vs. 354.08 ± 262.19; with statistical significance p = .014) and almost significant for gastrointestinal score (167.69 ± 174.79 vs. 347.55 ± 320.95; p = .247). The study showed that CSAL MPA may contribute to management of adverse effects, but these findings require confirmation of clinical utility.

The use of mycophenolate mofetil area under the curve

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been used successfully to treat a myriad of autoimmune diseases, its complex pharmacokinetics make it difficult to determine the true drug exposure for an individual patient. This review summarizes the body of literature focused on the gold standard measurement of the area under the curve (AUC) of mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active metabolite of MMF.

RECENT FINDINGS

Fixed dosing of MMF leads to highly variable drug exposure. Retrospective series have reported improved clinical outcomes when a minimum AUC value from 0 to 12 h (AUC0-12h) ≥30 mg h/l is achieved. MPA levels are affected by various drug interactions, hypoalbuminemia, and renal insufficiency and the measurement of free rather than total MPA levels is prudent in some situations. A limited number of studies employing prospective dose adjustment of MMF based on AUC0-12h measurements have yielded mixed results.

SUMMARY

Given the wide range of MPA AUC encountered in autoimmune diseases, dose adjustments of MMF based on AUC rather than fixed dosing of MMF should be considered in both clinical practice and clinical trials. Limited sampling strategies have been proposed to improve clinical feasibility of measurements, but a standard is yet to be defined.

Personalized Therapy for Mycophenolate: Consensus Report by the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology

ABSTRACT

When mycophenolic acid (MPA) was originally marketed for immunosuppressive therapy, fixed doses were recommended by the manufacturer. Awareness of the potential for a more personalized dosing has led to development of methods to estimate MPA area under the curve based on the measurement of drug concentrations in only a few samples. This approach is feasible in the clinical routine and has proven successful in terms of correlation with outcome. However, the search for superior correlates has continued, and numerous studies in search of biomarkers that could better predict the perfect dosage for the individual patient have been published. As it was considered timely for an updated and comprehensive presentation of consensus on the status for personalized treatment with MPA, this report was prepared following an initiative from members of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT). Topics included are the criteria for analytics, methods to estimate exposure including pharmacometrics, the potential influence of pharmacogenetics, development of biomarkers, and the practical aspects of implementation of target concentration intervention. For selected topics with sufficient evidence, such as the application of limited sampling strategies for MPA area under the curve, graded recommendations on target ranges are presented. To provide a comprehensive review, this report also includes updates on the status of potential biomarkers including those which may be promising but with a low level of evidence. In view of the fact that there are very few new immunosuppressive drugs under development for the transplant field, it is likely that MPA will continue to be prescribed on a large scale in the upcoming years. Discontinuation of therapy due to adverse effects is relatively common, increasing the risk for late rejections, which may contribute to graft loss. Therefore, the continued search for innovative methods to better personalize MPA dosage is warranted.

A multidrug LC–MS/MS method for the determination of five immunosuppressants in oral fluid

Aim: This study aimed: to develop and validate an LC–MS/MS method for mycophenolic acid, tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus and cyclosporin A in oral fluid (OF), as an essential tool to study the usefulness of OF as an alternative matrix for immunossuppressants’ therapeutic drug monitoring; and to find the best OF collector for these analytes. Materials & Methods: Chromatographic separation was achieved using an XBridge® Shield RP18 analytical column maintained at 65ºC, using 2 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and acetonitrile (B) as mobile phase. OF sample was extracted with solid phase extraction after sonication and protein precipitation. Results & Conclusions: Method validation met all the acceptance criteria. LODs were 0.05–1 ng/ml, and LOQs 0.1–5 ng/ml. Silanized tubes offered the best recoveries. The method was successfully applied to 31 OF specimens, describing everolimus detection in OF for the first time. Conclusion: The proposed method is sensitive enough for the detection of OF trough concentrations in patients receiving immunosuppressants when using an appropriate OF collector.