Evaluation of the anatomical factors affecting the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery for isolated lower pole kidney stones

Enhancing lithotripsy efficiency in retrograde intrarenal surgery via a flexible kidney-fixed position: findings from a prospective cohort study

Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is recognized as an effective intervention for renal stones measuring less than 20 mm. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of a novel flexible kidney-fixed position compared to the conventional lithotomy position, focusing on lithotripsy efficiency and stone-free rates (SFR). A total of 100 patients undergoing unilateral RIRS between January 2023 and September 2024 were randomly allocated to either the conventional lithotomy position group or the kidney-fixed position group. Comparative analyses were conducted on demographic data, stone characteristics, intraoperative parameters, kidney movement metrics, and postoperative complications. A total of 97 patients successfully completed the study, with 47 participants assigned to the conventional lithotomy group and 49 to the kidney-fixed group. The kidney-fixed position was associated with a significant reduction in kidney movement (4.00 mm compared to 15.30 mm, p < 0.001) and a decrease in operative time (48.35 min versus 71.72 min, p < 0.001). Additionally, the SFR for stones measuring ≤ 4 mm was significantly higher in the kidney-fixed group (91.84% compared to 68.09%, p = 0.020). The implementation of a flexible kidney-fixed position markedly improves the efficacy of lithotripsy during RIRS, resulting in reduced operative time and an elevated SFR without a corresponding increase in postoperative complications. This technique holds promise for advancing the surgical management of renal calculi, warranting further investigation to substantiate these findings and assess long-term outcomes.

Comparative analysis of scoring systems for patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery with isolated lower calyx stones

PURPOSE

It is critical to provide patients with accurate information on potential surgical outcomes during the preoperative phase. Several scoring systems have been developed for this specific purpose. This study aimed to examine the predicted efficacy of scoring systems in patients with isolated lower calyx stones who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 85 patients who underwent RIRS for lower calyx stones between 2016 and 2023. The study computed each participant's Resorlu-Unsal Stone score (RUSS), R.I.R.S. scoring system score, Modified Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity (S-ReSC) score, S.T.O.N.E. score, Ito's nomogram, and T.O.HO score. Residual stones less than 4 mm were classified as clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRFs) and regarded as successful. Following that, we used receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves to compare various scoring systems' success predictions.

RESULTS

The median scores for RUSS, R.I.R.S. scoring system, Modified S-ReSC, S.T.O.N.E., Ito's nomogram, and T.O.HO score were 1 (1), 7 (2), 2 (0), 11 (1), 18 (4), and 7 (1), respectively. When CIRF cases were included, the stone-free rate increased to 80%. Only Ito's nomogram from scoring systems has a statistically significant cut-off value for success in ROC analysis (p = 0.021). In multivariate analysis, stone volume and preoperative hydronephrosis were associated with success (p = 0.004 and p = 0.035, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In the multivariate analysis, none of the scoring systems were significantly associated with success. Hence, a new scoring system must be developed exclusively for patients with isolated lower pole stones undergoing RIRS.

Effect of infundibulopelvic angle on outcomes of ureteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The infundibulo-pelvic angle (IPA) is reportedly a predictor of successful ureteroscopy for lower pole renal stones, however there is uncertainty at which IPA success is likely. We therefore aimed to perform a meta-analysis and determine at which the angle of likely success and failure.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis as per Cochrane guidelines in accordance to the PRISMA statement. The review was registered with PROSPERO prior to commencement (ID: CRD42022296732). We included studies reporting on outcomes of ureteroscopy for lower pole stones, with IPA. We excluded patients undergoing alternative treatments for lower pole stones, anatomical abnormalities and studies with < 10 patients. We assessed bias with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We performed meta-analysis in R, and summarised the findings as per GRADE.

RESULTS

Overall, there were 13 studies included, with 10 included for meta-analysis. These studies covered n = 1964 patients (71% stone free). Overall, the stone free patients had a significantly less acute mean IPA (52o ± 9o), compared to the non-stone free patients (39o ± 7o), on meta-analysis (REM MD = -13.0, 95% CI: -18.7 to -7.2, p < 0.001). On examination of forest plots, at IPA < 30o no patients were stone free, whilst > 50o all were stone free. Risk of bias was moderate, and certainty of evidence was 'very low'.

CONCLUSION

With a very low certainty of evidence, we demonstrate that at an IPA of < 30o no patient is stone free, whilst > 50o all patients (in this review) are stone free. More evidence is therefore needed.

Needle-perc-assisted endoscopic surgery versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 1- to 2-cm lower-pole renal stones in patients with unfavorable infundibulopelvic anatomy: a matched-pair analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the safety and efficacy of needle-perc-assisted endoscopic surgery (NAES) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the treatment of 1- to 2-cm lower-pole stones (LPS) in patients with complex infundibulopelvic anatomy.

METHODS

Between June 2020 and July 2022, 32 patients with 1- to 2-cm LPS and unfavorable lower-pole anatomy for flexible ureteroscopy were treated with NAES. The outcomes of these patients were compared with patients who underwent RIRS using matched-pair analysis (1:1 scenario). The matching parameters such as age, gender, body mass index, stone size, hardness, and pelvicalyceal anatomy characteristics including infundibular pelvic angle, infundibular length, and width were recorded. Data were analyzed using the Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

The two groups had similar baseline characteristics and lower-pole anatomy. The stone burden was comparable between both groups. NASE achieved a significantly better initial stone-free rate (SFR) than RIRS (87.5% vs 62.5%, p = 0.04). The auxiliary rates for the NAES and RIRS groups were 12.5% and 31.3%, respectively (p = 0.13). Finally, the SFR after 1 month follow-up period was still higher for the NAES group than RIRS group (93.8% versus 81.3%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.26). Concerning the operation duration, overall complication rates, and postoperative hospital stay, there were no differences between two groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared to RIRS for treating 1- to 2-cm LPS in patients with unfavorable infundibulopelvic anatomy for flexible ureteroscopy, NAES was safe and effective with higher SFR and similar complication rate.

The relationship between stone-free and patient position in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a randomized prospective study

PURPOSE

Residual fragments not removed with urinary stone surgery may become symptomatic. In this context, this study was carried out to investigate the effect of performing retrograde intrarenal surgery, which is conventionally performed in the lithotomy position, in the modified lithotomy position (Trend-side) on stone-free rates following the surgery.

METHODS

This prospective study consisted of 100 patients with a single kidney stone smaller than 2 cm between 2021 and 2023. These patients were randomized into two groups of 50 patients each to be operated on in the conventional lithotomy and Trend-side positions. Variables were compared using independent t test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the lithotomy and Trend-side position groups in terms of preoperative size, density, location of the stone, and hydronephrosis degree. Stone-free rate was 72% (n = 36) in the lithotomy group and 92% (n = 46) in the Trend-side group. Hence, there was a significant difference between the groups in the stone-free rate in favor of the Trend-side group (p = 0.009). Fragmentation time was statistically significantly shorter in the Trend-side group than in the lithotomy group (34 ± 17 min vs. 43 ± 14 min; p = 0.006). There was no significant difference between the groups in postoperative complication rates.

CONCLUSION

Performing retrograde intrarenal surgery in the Trend-side position shortened the duration of fragmentation compared to the lithotomy position and was associated with higher stone-free rates. In conclusion, the Trend-side position can be safely preferred in patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery due to kidney stones.

New infundibulopelvic angle measurement method can predict stone-free rates following retrograde intrarenal surgery

To enhance the accuracy of predicting stone-free rates after retrograde intrarenal surgery, we devised a novel approach to assess the renal infundibulopelvic angle. We conducted a retrospective review of patient records for those who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones between April 2018 and August 2019. Patient demographics, stone characteristics, and perioperative data were recorded. Subsequently, we introduced a modified angle measurement called the pelvic stone angle and evaluated its predictive performance for stone-free rates by comparing it with the traditional method in scoring systems. A total of 43 individuals were included in this study. Notable differences in stone burden and Hounsfield unit measurements were found between stone-free and non-stone-free patients. The pelvic stone angle demonstrated a good model fit when used in scoring systems, performing equally well as the conventional approach. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the R.I.R.S. scoring system using the pelvic stone angle and the conventional approach did not show a significant difference. In conclusion, the predictive ability of the pelvic stone angle for stone-free rates was comparable to the old measurement method. Moreover, scoring systems using the pelvic stone angle exhibited a better model fit than those using the conventional approach.

Flexible ureteroscopy for lower pole calculus: is it still a challenge?

PURPOSE

Flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) is steadily gaining popularity in the management of renal calculi, including those located in the lower pole (LP). Due to difficulty in accessing to the LP of kidney in minority of cases with fURS and reports of lower stone-free rate (SFR), it is still considered as a challenge in selected cases. The purpose of the review was to analyze the various aspects of fURS for LP stones.

METHODS

An extensive review of the recent literature was done including different factors such as anatomy, preoperative stenting, stone size, flexible scopes, types of lasers, laser fibers, suction, relocation, stone-free rates, and complications.

RESULTS

The significance of various lower pole anatomical measurements remain a subject of debate and requires standardization. Recent improvements in fURS such as single-use digital scopes with better vision and flexibility, high power laser, thulium fiber laser, smaller laser fiber, and accessories have significantly contributed to make flexible ureteroscopy  more effective and safer in the management of LP stone. The utilization of thulium fiber lasers in conjunction with various suction devices is being recognized and can significantly improve SFR.

CONCLUSIONS

With the significant advancement of various aspects of fURS, this treatment modality has shown remarkable efficacy and gaining widespread acceptance in management of LP kidney stones. These developments have made the fURS of LP stones less challenging.

Evaluation of validity and reliability of novel rapid measurement for infundibulopelvic angle: a comparison with PACS system

BACKGROUND

For patients with lower pole renal calculi (LPC), preoperative evaluation of infundibulopelvic angles (IPA) is of great significance; however, conventional measuring method is often inconvenient in clinical setting. Here we introduce a rapid novel method using built-in inclinometer in smartphone which is often used in anatomical parameters evaluating to implement the measurement of IPA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The randomized, self-controlled study on evaluating inclinometer application measured IPA on urography films collected from enrolled LPC patients. Results of statistical analysis for its validity and reliability compared to conventional PACS system are reported. Predictive performance of postoperative stone-free rates by IPA measured with the novel method was also evaluated in this study.

RESULTS

Bland-Altman plot result shows that there is favorable agreement between IPA values of these two methods. The time required to utilize the PACS was considerably greater than time required to take similar measure using smartphones. The precision-recall curve (PRC) indicates that the new method has similar predictive performance for postoperative clearance rates as PACS.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, measurement of IPA implemented by integrated inclinometer of smartphone is rapid, convenient, accurate and reliable in evaluating renal anatomy parameters of LPC patients.

International Alliance of Urolithiasis guideline on retrograde intrarenal surgery

OBJECTIVES

To set out the second in a series of guidelines on the treatment of urolithiasis by the International Alliance of Urolithiasis that concerns retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), with the aim of providing a clinical framework for urologists performing RIRS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After a comprehensive search of RIRS-related literature published between 1 January 1964 and 1 October 2021 from the PubMed database, systematic review and assessment were performed to inform a series of recommendations, which were graded using modified GRADE methodology. Additionally, quality of evidence was classified using a modification of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence system. Finally, related comments were provided.

RESULTS

A total of 36 recommendations were developed and graded that covered the following topics: indications and contraindications; preoperative imaging; preoperative ureteric stenting; preoperative medications; peri-operative antibiotics; management of antithrombotic therapy; anaesthesia; patient positioning; equipment; lithotripsy; exit strategy; and complications.

CONCLUSION

The series of recommendations regarding RIRS, along with the related commentary and supporting documentation, offered here should help provide safe and effective performance of RIRS.

Role of low- versus high-power laser in the treatment of lower pole stones: prospective non-randomized outcomes from a university teaching hospital

Introduction:

Ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation [flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy (FURSL)] has risen over the last two decades. Laser technology has also evolved over the time, shifting from low- to high-power lasers with the addition of MOSES technology that allows for ‘dusting and pop-dusting’ of stones. The aim of the study was to look at the outcomes of FURSL in lower pole stones (LPS) using low- and high-power lasers.

Patient and Methods:

In this study, we compared the outcomes of low-power holmium laser (group A, 20 W) and high-power holmium laser (group B, including both 60 W MOSES integrated system and 100 W lasers) for all patients with LPS treated with laser lithotripsy. Data were collected for patient demographics, stone location, size, pre- and postoperative stent, length of stay, complications and stone free rate (SFR).

Results:

A total of 284 patients who underwent FURSL procedure for LPS were analysed (168 group A, 116 group B). Outcomes showed that compared with group A, group B had a higher SFR (91.6% versus 96.5%, p = 0.13) and shorter operative time (52 versus 38 min, p < 0.001). The median length of stay was <24 h in all groups (day-case procedures). The complication rate was comparable between the two groups but with more infectious complications (n = 7) noted in group A compared with group B (n = 3) (p = 0.53).

Conclusion:

Compared with low-power laser, the use of high-power laser for LPS significantly reduced the use of ureteral access sheath (UAS), postoperative stent and procedural time. Although non-statistically significant, the SFR was higher in the high-power group even for relatively larger stone sizes, which was also reflected in a reduction of sepsis-related complication rates with these lasers.