High-dose sotalol is safe and effective in neonates and infants with refractory supraventricular tachyarrhythmias

Pharmacological Management of Cardiac Arrhythmias in the Fetal and Neonatal Periods: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association: Endorsed by the Pediatric & Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES)

Disorders of the cardiac rhythm may occur in both the fetus and neonate. Because of the immature myocardium, the hemodynamic consequences of either bradyarrhythmias or tachyarrhythmias may be far more significant than in mature physiological states. Treatment options are limited in the fetus and neonate because of limited vascular access, patient size, and the significant risk/benefit ratio of any intervention. In addition, exposure of the fetus or neonate to either persistent arrhythmias or antiarrhythmic medications may have yet-to-be-determined long-term developmental consequences. This scientific statement discusses the mechanism of arrhythmias, pharmacological treatment options, and distinct aspects of pharmacokinetics for the fetus and neonate. From the available current data, subjects of apparent consistency/consensus are presented, as well as future directions for research in terms of aspects of care for which evidence has not been established.

Sotalol in neonates for arrhythmias: Dosing, safety, and efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Various agents may be utilized to manage supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in neonates and infants. Recently, sotalol has piqued interest given its reported success in managing neonates and infants with SVTs, especially with the intravenous formulation. While the manufacturer recommends using an age-related nomogram in neonates and young infants to guide doses, clinical reports describe various dosing based on weight (mg/kg) or on body surface area (BSA) in mg/m2 . Given the reported variation in clinical practice with regard to dosing in neonates, there is a gap in the literature and translation into clinical practice regarding applicability of the nomogram into clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to describe sotalol doses based on body weight and BSA in neonates for SVT.

METHODS

This is a single center retrospective study evaluating effective sotalol dosing from January 2011 and June 2021 (inclusive). Neonates who received intravenous (IV) or oral (PO) sotalol for SVT were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was to describe sotalol doses based on body weight and BSA. Secondary outcomes include comparison of doses to the manufacturer nomogram, description of dose titrations, reported adverse outcomes, and change in therapy. Two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to determine statistically significant differences.

RESULTS

Thirty-one eligible patients were included in this study. The median (range) age and weight were 16.5 (1-28) days and 3.2 (1.8-4.9) kg, respectively. The median initial dose was 7.3 (1.9-10.8) mg/kg or 114.3 (30.9-166.7) mg/m2 /day. Fourteen (45.2%) of patients required a dose increase for SVT control. The median dose required for rhythm control was 8.5 (2-14.8) mg/kg/day or 120.7 (30.9-225) mg/m2 /day. Of note, the median recommended dose per manufacturer nomogram for our patients would have been 51.3 (16.2-73.8) mg/m2 /day, which is significantly lower than both the initial dose (p < .001) and final doses (p < .001) utilized in our study. A total of 7 (22.9%) patients were uncontrolled on sotalol monotherapy using our dosing regimen. Two patients (6.5%) had reports of hypotension and one patient (3.3%) had a report of bradycardia requiring discontinuation of therapy. The average change in baseline QTC following sotalol initiation was 6.8%. Twenty-seven (87.1%), 3 (9.7%), 1 (3.3%) experienced prolongation, no change, or a decrease in QTc, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that a sotalol strategy significantly higher than the manufacture dose recommendations are required for rhythm control in neonates with SVT. There were few adverse events reported with this dosing. Further prospective studies would be advantageous to confirm these findings.

"Second line medications" for supraventricular arrhythmias in children: In-hospital efficacy and adverse events during treatment initiation of sotalol and flecainide

INTRODUCTION

Sotalol and flecainide are used as second line agents in children for the treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias (SA) refractory to anti-beta adrenergic antiarrhythmics or digoxin. Efficacy and adverse events in this cohort have not been well described. Here, we report our institutional experience of second line treatment initiation for SA in children.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Utilizing an institutional database, 247 patients initiated on sotalol and 81 patients initiated on flecainide were identified. Congenital heart disease (CHD) was present in 40% of patients. Arrhythmia-free discharge on single or dual agent therapy (in combination with other antiarrhythmics) was 87% for sotalol and 91% for flecainide. Neither age, sex, dosing, presence of CHD nor arrhythmia subtype were associated with alterations in in-hospital efficacy. Compared to baseline, QTc intervals in sotalol patients (436 [416-452 ms] vs. 415 [400-431 ms], p < .01) and QRS intervals in flecainide patients (75 [68-88 ms] vs. 62 [56-71 ms], p < .01) were prolonged. Dose reduction or discontinuation due to QRS prolongation occurred in 9% of patients on flecainide. QTc prolongation resulting in dose reduction/discontinuation of sotalol was encountered in 9 patients (4%) and death with documented torsade de pointes in 2 patients (1%), with 9 of 11 patients having underlying CHD.

CONCLUSION

In children requiring second line agents for treatment of SA, both sotalol and flecainide appear to be highly efficacious. Although predominantly safe in otherwise healthy patients, electrocardiogram changes can occur and children with underlying cardiac disease may have an increased risk of adverse events and rhythm-related side effects during initiation.

Supraventricular tachycardias in the first year of life: what is the best pharmacological treatment? 24 years of experience in a single centre

Background

Supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) are common in the first year of life and may be life-threatening. Acute cardioversion is usually effective, with both pharmacological and non-pharmacological procedures. However, as yet no international consensus exists concerning the best drug required for a stable conversion to sinus rhythm (maintenance treatment). Our study intends to describe the experience of a single centre with maintenance drug treatment of both re-entry and automatic SVTs in the first year of life.

Methods

From March 1995 to April 2019, 55 patients under one year of age with SVT were observed in our Centre. The SVTs were divided into two groups: 45 re-entry and 10 automatic tachycardias. As regards maintenance therapy, in re-entry tachycardias, we chose to start with oral flecainide and in case of relapses switched to combined treatment with beta-blockers or digoxin. In automatic tachycardias we first administered a beta-blocker, later combined with flecainide or amiodarone when ineffective.

Results

The patients’ median follow-up time was 35 months. In re-entry tachycardias, flecainide was effective as monotherapy in 23/45 patients (51.1%) and in 20/45 patients (44.4%) in combination with nadolol, sotalol or digoxin (overall 95.5%). In automatic tachycardias, a beta-blocker alone was effective in 3/10 patients (30.0%), however, the best results were obtained when combined with flecainide: overall 9/10 (90%).

Conclusions

In this retrospective study on pharmacological treatment of SVTs under 1 year of age the combination of flecainide and beta-blockers was highly effective in long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm in both re-entry and automatic tachycardias.

Intravenous Sotalol in the Young: Safe and Effective Treatment With Standardized Protocols

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the safety and efficacy of novel and standardized protocols for the use of intravenous (IV) sotalol in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND

Acute arrhythmia treatments in children remain limited. IV sotalol is a new option but pediatric experience is limited. There is no standardized protocol for rapid infusion during acute arrhythmias. This study assessed a single center's initial experience with IV sotalol in young patients, describing a protocol for rapid infusion for acute treatment, and reviewed the safety and efficacy of maintenance dosing.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of all patients who received IV sotalol at Rady Children's Hospital. Demographics, arrhythmia, hemodynamics, and effects of IV sotalol were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients received IV sotalol from December 2015 to December 2018. Group 1 (n = 26) received sotalol for acute therapy and group 2 (n = 11) received a maintenance dose of sotalol after successful cardioversion with alternate therapies. The groups had similar demographics. Group 1 included patients with atrial flutter (n = 16), patients with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) (n = 9), and patients with atrial ectopic tachycardia (AET) (n = 1). All 9 patients with SVT (100%) converted to sinus rhythm after failure to convert using adenosine. Median administration time was 15 min, the median dose was 30 mg/m², and mean time to cardioversion was 14 min. Group 2 median infusion time was 120 min, the median dose was 54 mg/m²/day, and all patients maintained sinus rhythm. No patients required cessation for adverse effects previously described for IV sotalol.

CONCLUSIONS

IV sotalol was safe and effective for acute and maintenance therapy in young patients. In acute patients, 30 mg/m² over 15 min converted most patients. IV sotalol adds a valuable option to IV therapies in the young.

Intravenous Amiodarone and Sotalol Impair Contractility and Cardiac Output, but Procainamide Does Not: A Langendorff Study

INTRODUCTION

Direct comparison of the effects of antiarrhythmic agents on myocardial performance may be useful in choosing between medications in critically ill patients. Studies directly comparing multiple antiarrhythmic medications are lacking. The use of an experimental heart preparation permits examination of myocardial performance under constant loading conditions.

METHODS

Hearts of Sprague Dawley rats (n = 35, 402-507 g) were explanted and cannulated in working heart model with fixed preload and afterload. Each heart was then exposed to a 3-hour infusion of procainamide (20 µg/kg/min), esmolol (100 or 200 µg/kg/min), amiodarone (10 or 20 mg/kg/d), sotalol (80 mg/m²/d), or placebo infusions (n = 5 per dose). Cardiac output, contractility (dP/dT_max), diastolic performance (dP/dT_min), and heart rate were compared between groups over time by linear mixed modeling.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, sotalol decreased contractility by an average of 24% ( P < .001) over the infusion period, as did amiodarone (low dose by 13%, P = .029; high dose by 14%, P = .013). Compared with placebo, mean cardiac output was significantly lower in animals treated with sotalol (by 22%, P = .016) and esmolol 200 μg/kg/min (by 23%, P = .012). Over time, amiodarone decreased cardiac output (20 mg/kg/d, β = -89 [-144, -33] μL/min² decrease, P = .002) and also worsened diastolic function, decreasing dP/dT_min by ∼18% and 22% ( P = .032 and P = .011, low and high doses, respectively). Procainamide did not have a significant effect on any measures of systolic or diastolic performance.

CONCLUSIONS

In isolated hearts, amiodarone and sotalol depressed myocardial contractility, cardiac output, and diastolic function. However, procainamide did not negatively affect myocardial performance and represents a favorable agent in settings of therapeutic equivalence.

Early experience with intravenous sotalol in children with and without congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Arrhythmias are common in the pediatric population. In patients unable to take oral medications or in need of acute therapy, options of intravenous (IV) antiarrhythmic medications are limited. Recently IV sotalol has become readily available, but experience in children is limited.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe our initial experience with the use of IV sotalol in the pediatric population.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all pediatric patients receiving IV sotalol was performed. Patient demographic characteristics, presence of congenital heart disease, arrhythmia type, efficacy of IV sotalol use, and adverse effects were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients (26 (55%) male and 24 (51%) with congenital heart disease) received IV sotalol at a median age of 2.05 years (interquartile range 0.07-10.03 years) and a median weight of 12.8 kg (interquartile range 3.8-34.2 kg), and 13 (28%) received IV sotalol in the acute postoperative setting. Supraventricular arrhythmias occurred in 40 patients (85%) and ventricular tachycardia in 7 (15%). Among 24 patients receiving IV sotalol for an active arrhythmia, acute termination was achieved in 21 (88%). Twenty-three patients received IV sotalol as maintenance therapy for recurrent arrhythmias owing to inability to take oral antiarrhythmic medications; 19 (83%) were controlled with sotalol monotherapy. No patient required discontinuation of IV sotalol secondary to adverse effects, proarrhythmia, or QT prolongation.

CONCLUSION

IV sotalol is an effective antiarrhythmic option for pediatric patients and may be an excellent agent for acute termination of active arrhythmias. It was well tolerated, with no patient requiring discontinuation secondary to adverse effects.

Neonatal arrhythmias: diagnosis, treatment, and clinical outcome

Arrhythmias in the neonatal period are not uncommon, and may occur in neonates with a normal heart or in those with structural heart disease. Neonatal arrhythmias are classified as either benign or nonbenign. Benign arrhythmias include sinus arrhythmia, premature atrial contraction, premature ventricular contraction, and junctional rhythm; these arrhythmias have no clinical significance and do not need therapy. Supraventricular tachycardia, ventricular tachycardia, atrioventricular conduction abnormalities, and genetic arrhythmia such as congenital long-QT syndrome are classified as nonbenign arrhythmias. Although most neonatal arrhythmias are asymptomatic and rarely life-threatening, the prognosis depends on the early recognition and proper management of the condition in some serious cases. Precise diagnosis with risk stratification of patients with nonbenign neonatal arrhythmia is needed to reduce morbidity and mortality. In this article, I review the current understanding of the common clinical presentation, etiology, natural history, and management of neonatal arrhythmias in the absence of an underlying congenital heart disease.

Intravenous Sotalol - Reintroducing a Forgotten Agent to the Electrophysiology Therapeutic Arsenal

Sotalol is a racemic mixture possessing beta-blocker and class III anti arrhythmic properties. Approved by US food and drug administration (FDA) since 2009 based on its bioequivalence with oral sotalol, clinicians are less familiar with the potential uses of the intravenous form despite its re-launch in United States in 2015. Available literature suggests that intravenous sotalol in recommended doses can be safely administered in adult and pediatric population achieving rapid reliable therapeutic plasma concentration and without additional proarrhythmic effects when compared to its oral form as well as other antiarrhythmic medications. Intravenous sotalol may have potential uses as an alternative agent for highly symptomatic atrial fibrillation post cardiac surgery as well as in life threatening ventricular arrhythmias. As with its oral form, judicious use with close attention to QTc and renal function is warranted. Further studies are needed to better understand the safety, efficacy and different dosing regimens of parenteral sotalol in adults and children.

Pediatric Dosing of Intravenous Sotalol Based on Body Surface Area in Patients with Arrhythmia

In a recently published study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravenous sotalol in pediatric patients with incessant tachyarrhythmias and we have found that intravenous sotalol is effective and safe. Our dosing regimen was based on the body weight of the patients. In the US, the recommendation for intravenous sotalol dosing in pediatric patients is based on body surface area (BSA) while taking into consideration the patients' age. The purpose of this paper is to show the correspondence of a body weight-based dosing regimen when expressed for BSA as mg/m². We evaluated the similarity of a body weight-based dose to that calculated based on BSA using the US labeling recommendations. Of the 83 patients, 5 were newborns (age: 0-30 days), 39 infants and toddlers (age: 1-24 month), 26 young children (age: >2-6 years), 11 older children (age: 6-12 years), and 2 adolescents (age: 14 years). Each received a loading dose of 1 mg/kg intravenous sotalol administered over 10 min followed by a maintenance dose of 4.5 mg/kg/day. There was a close correlation between the sotalol loading doses calculated based on body weight and BSA across the entire age range (r = 0.977, p < 0.001). In most of the age groups, the body weight-based loading doses were lower or equal to the BSA-based doses. Only in the adolescents were the body weight-based doses higher. The maintenance doses given in our study were significantly higher than the BSA-based dose in newborns: 75 ± 6 versus 53 ± 8 mg/m², p < 0.05; infants/toddlers: 88 ± 14 versus 77 ± 7 mg/m², p < 0.001; younger children: 113 ± 12 versus 85 mg/m², p < 0.001; older children: 123 ± 16 versus 85 mg/m², p < 0.01; and adolescents 157 ± 30 versus 85.5 mg/m². Despite the rapid administration of the loading dose and the increased maintenance doses, our body weight-based dosing regimen was safe. Only one newborn had significant adverse event (AV block) that resolved spontaneously after discontinuation of the infusion.

Variation in Antiarrhythmic Management of Infants Hospitalized with Supraventricular Tachycardia: A Multi-Institutional Analysis

Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is the most frequent form of symptomatic tachyarrhythmia in infants. The purposes of this study were to describe practice patterns of the management of infants hospitalized with SVT and factors associated with 30-day hospital readmission. This was a multi-institutional, retrospective review of the pediatric health information system database of SVT hospitalizations from 2003 to 2013. High-volume centers (HVC) were defined as those at the upper quartile of admissions. Infants with an ICD-9 code of paroxysmal SVT were included. Antiarrhythmics investigated included amiodarone, atenolol, digoxin, esmolol, flecainide, procainamide, propafenone, propranolol, and sotalol. Frequency of antiarrhythmic use based on center volume was the primary end point. Rate of 30-day SVT readmission was the secondary end point. Analysis of factors associated with readmission was assessed by Chi-square analysis and expressed as odds ratio and 95 % confidence interval. A total of 851 patients (60 % male, 44 % neonates) were hospitalized at 43 hospitals. Propranolol, digoxin, and amiodarone were the most frequently utilized antiarrhythmics. HVCs represented 12 hospitals comprising 494 (58 %) patients. Although HVCs were more likely to utilize propranolol (OR 2.5, CI 1.5-4.1), there was no significant difference in the 30-day readmission rate between patients treated at HVCs versus non-HVCs (p = 0.9). The majority of infants with SVT are treated with a small number of antiarrhythmic medications during index hospitalization. Although hospital-to-hospital variation in antiarrhythmic choice exists, there appears to be no difference in readmission. The remaining practice variation may be related to intrinsic patient characteristics.

Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society 2014 Consensus Statement: Pharmacotherapies in Cardiac Critical Care Antiarrhythmics

OBJECTIVE

Arrhythmias are a common occurrence in critically ill pediatric patients. Pharmacotherapy is a usual modality for treatment and prevention of arrhythmias in this patient population. This review will highlight particular arrhythmias in the pediatric critical care population and discuss salient points of pharmacotherapy of these arrhythmias. The mechanisms of action for the various agents, potential adverse events, place in therapy, and evidence for their use will be summarized.

DATA SOURCES

The literature was searched for articles related to the topic. Expertise of the authors and a consensus of the editors were additional sources of data in the article.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The author team synthesized the current pharmacology and recommendations and present them in this review. Tables were generated to summarize the state of the art evidence-based practice.

CONCLUSION

Specialized knowledge as to the safe and effective use of the antiarrhythmic pharmacotherapy in the intensive care setting can lead to safe and effective rhythm management in patients with complex heart disease.

Treatment of supraventricular tachycardia in infants: Analysis of a large multicenter database

OBJECTIVE

Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is the most common arrhythmia in infants. Infants are typically treated with antiarrhythmic medications, but there is a lack of evidence guiding management, thus exposing infants to risks of both inadequate therapy and medication adverse events. We used data from a large clinical database to better understand current practices in SVT management, safety of commonly used medications, and outcomes of hospitalized infants treated for SVT.

METHODS

This retrospective data analysis included all infants discharged from Pediatrix Medical Group neonatal intensive care units between 1998 and 2012 with a diagnosis of SVT who were treated with antiarrhythmic medications. We categorized infants by the presence of congenital heart disease other than patent ductus arteriosus. Medications were categorized as abortive, acute, or secondary prevention therapies. We used descriptive statistics to describe medication use, adverse events, and outcomes including SVT recurrence and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 2848 infants with SVT were identified, of whom 367 (13%) had congenital heart disease. Overall, SVT in-hospital recurrence was high (13%), and almost one fifth of our cohort (18%) experienced an adverse event. Mortality was 2% in the overall cohort and 6% in the congenital heart disease group (p<0.001). Adenosine was the most commonly used abortive therapy, but there was significant practice variation in therapies used for acute treatment and secondary prevention of SVT.

CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATION

Significant variation in SVT treatment and suboptimal outcomes warrant future clinical trials to determine best practices in treating SVT in infants.

Factors associated with the occurrence and treatment of supraventricular tachycardia in a pediatric congenital heart disease cohort

In patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), the association between supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), type of pathophysiology, and therapeutic interventions in a population-based cohort warrants further examination. A retrospective, longitudinal 15-year data set (1996-2010) was analyzed. Inclusion criteria included age ≤17 years, enrolled in South Carolina State Medicaid, and diagnosed as having one or more CHDs as well as SVT. SVT was diagnosed in 6.5 % of CHD patients (N = 1,169) during the 15-year epoch investigated. SVT was less likely to occur in African-American (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.76) or male patients (HR = 0.88), but it was significantly more likely to occur in patients age ≤12 months or in adolescents ≥13 years in those undergoing multiple surgeries/medical interventions for their CHD (HR = 1.14), those receiving antiarrhythmic/diuretic/preload-/afterload-reducing medications (HR = 5.46), and those with severe/cyanotic CHDs (HR = 1.52) or chromosomal abnormalities (HR = 1.64). Children who had an atrial septal defect secundum (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.03) and those treated with diuretic or antiarrhythmic medication (aOR = 1.80) were significantly more likely to undergo SVT ablation, whereas those with late-onset pulmonary hypertension (ages 6-12 years old) were significantly less likely to undergo SVT ablation. SVT recurred in only 14 of 166 patients who underwent SVT ablation. Multiple medical interventions at an early age may increase the risk of SVT occurrence in young CHD patients regardless of the severity/complexity of the CHD.