Voiding urosonography with US contrast agents for the diagnosis of vesicoureteric reflux in children. II. Comparison with radiological examinations

Fluoroscopy in pediatric radiology: Review of current use and alternatives

Fluoroscopy has long been an essential imaging modality in pediatric radiology. However, concerns about radiation exposure in children and the need for on-site staff have led to a decline in its use and the exploration of alternative imaging techniques. Data from the Pediatric Health Information System and our institution show a decrease in fluoroscopic studies among pediatric inpatients, from 56,371 per year (2017-2020) to 46,973 per year (2020-2023). Alternative modalities such as endoscopy, ultrasound, and computed tomography demonstrate promise in assessing conditions of the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and urinary systems. Although fluoroscopy remains valuable in certain scenarios, these alternative imaging modalities offer advantages in terms of diagnostic accuracy, accessibility, costs, and reduced radiation exposure. However, the final choice of imaging technique should be based on careful consideration of the specific clinical context, patient factors, and available resources. In this review, we present institutional and national trends on the utilization of fluoroscopic studies over the past years, along with a side-by-side comparison of traditional fluoroscopic studies commonly performed in children and newer alternative modalities.

How I Do It: Contrast-enhanced US Applications in Children

Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) allows a detailed assessment of the tissue microvasculature after intravenous injection of contrast material. The use of CEUS also allows opacification of nonvascular hollow organs and fluid compartments after intracavitary instillation of dilute contrast material. This capability is far beyond that of grayscale and Doppler US techniques. The advantages of CEUS include its ease of use, high safety profile, and absence of ionizing radiation, making it an ideal tool for pediatric imaging. In 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved CEUS for use in children for characterization of focal liver lesions and diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux. Because the US contrast agent is distributed throughout the vascular pool, additional off-label imaging studies have focused on a variety of anatomic structures. This review of pediatric CEUS discusses the safety and technical aspects of CEUS, provides practical information on how to perform intravascular and intracavitary examinations, addresses the most common clinical applications of this method, and offers advice regarding the integration of CEUS into pediatric daily clinical practice.

Contrast media viscosity and its potential effect on the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux in children

OBJECTIVE

To confirm that contrast-enhanced voiding cystourosonography (ceVUS) diagnoses more vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) than voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) and assess whether this could be explained by contrast agent viscosity differences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Children addressed for a VCUG for suspected or known VUR between April 2021 and June 2023 were prospectively included. CeVUS and VCUG were consecutively performed during the same procedure by two operators; for each pelviureteric unit (PUU), VUR presence was assessed and scored (I-V scale). At least 6 months later, three radiologists reassessed VUR grading on all ceVUS static images. The viscosity of the two contrast agents and of the urine were measured at 25 °C and 37 °C. Wilcoxon tests were used for comparisons and linear Cohen's Kappa coefficient for Interobserver and Intraobserver agreement.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine children, representing 192 PUU, were included. VUR was detected in 54 PUUs by at least one technique, by both in 30/54, by ceVUS only in 21/54 (38.8%), and by VCUG only in 3/54 (5.5%). VUR grade was higher with ceVUS in 19/30 (63.3%, p < 0.0008) PUUs. The ceVUS agent viscosity at 25 °C/37 °C (1.13 cP/1.03 cP) was almost identical to urine viscosity (1.14 cP/1.02 cP) and it was respectively 8 and 6 times lower than VCUG contrast agent viscosity (9.44 cP/6.03 cP). The Cohen's kappa for ceVUS grading was between 0.75-0.97 (interobserver) and 0.93-0.98 (intraobserver).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms that ceVUS detects more VUR and grades them higher in comparison to VCUG in children. This could be explained by the lower viscosity of the US contrast agent.

KEY POINTS

Question Why are there differences in detecting and grading VUR between ceVUS and VCUG? Finding VUR was detected by ceVUS or VCUG only in, respectively 38.8% and 5.5% of PUUs. VUR grade was higher with ceVUS in 63.3%. Clinical relevance The higher detection rate and grading of vesicoureteral reflux in children by ceVUS might be explained by the lower viscosity of its sonographic contrast agent. CeVUS might reproduce the urine movement in the urinary tract.

Value of contrast-enhanced sonography in the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the urinary tract and bladder (ceVUS) is an alternative examination method to micturition cysturethrography (MCU/VCUG) for suspected vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) that is increasing in practice. The purpose of this review is to present the current value of ceVUS in the diagnosis.

METHOD

A systematic literature search was performed using the keywords "vesicoureteral reflux", "ceVUS", "VCUG" of the databases MEDLINE and Cochrane Library as well as a review of current German, European, and American guidelines on this topic. In addition, recommendations for action in clinical practice were developed.

CONCLUSION

ceVUS is a quick-to-learn examination method that is equivalent to VCUG for the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux and should be used as the diagnostic method of first choice when available given the absence of radiation exposure.

KEY POINTS

· Like VCUG, ceVUS is the diagnostic method of first choice in suspected vesicoureteral reflux and should be used preferentially given the absence of radiation exposure.. · Especially in comparison to the alternative VCUG, ceVUS is a quick-to-learn examination method.. · ceVUS can also be used to diagnose other pathologies of the lower urinary tract..

CITATION FORMAT

· Conen P, Thiemann J, Stredele R et al. Value of contrast-enhanced sonography in the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 1022 - 1028.

Imaging of Vesicoureteral Reflux: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a common congenital anomaly of the urinary tract that can present with collecting system dilation or as a febrile infection. VUR can lead to permanent renal sequelae requiring surgery but can also spontaneously resolve without complication. Therefore, recognizing patient populations who warrant imaging for screening, confirmation, or ongoing surveillance for VUR is important, as is avoiding overdiagnosis. In the appropriate patient populations, an accurate diagnosis of VUR allows early treatment and prevention of pyelonephritis and scarring. Various imaging modalities are available to diagnose and grade VUR, including voiding cystourethrography, radionucleotide cystography, and contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS). The objective of this article is to summarize the current understanding of VUR diagnosis and management and to discuss these imaging modalities' strengths and pitfalls. Considerations include indications for VUR imaging, patient preparation, conduct of the examination, issues related to radiologic reporting, and cost-effectiveness. An emphasis is placed on ceVUS, which is the most recently introduced of the three imaging modalities and is receiving growing support among pediatric radiologists.

Novel use of contrast enhanced ultrasonography with urodynamics in children: A comparison study to fluoroscopy

INTRODUCTION

Video urodynamics (UDS) has classically been performed using fluoroscopy (fluoro). Contrast enhanced voiding ultrasonography (ceVUS) has rarely been reported for use with UDS. This is the first study to compare the imaging characteristics of ceVUS versus fluoro UDS.

METHODS

Children were enrolled for ceVUS UDS who previously underwent fluoro UDS. Demographics, imaging data for ceVUS and fluoro UDS, time between studies, and clinical data between studies were recorded. Changes in clinical status included implantation/cessation of catheterization or anticholinergic medications, leakage between, urinary tract infections, hydronephrosis and neurologic changes. Comparison testing was performed using McNemar's Chi-Squared and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.

RESULTS

Seventy-five children were recruited. Median time between studies was 1.3 years (IQR 0.9-2.9). There were no differences for bladder shape (p = 0.59), vesicoureteral reflux (p = 0.10), bladder neck (p = 0.59) or urethra (p = 1.0) between studies. In 5 cases, the bladder neck could not be visualized adequately due to layering of the microbubble contrast against urine. Benefits to ceVUS included ability to visualize the exact moment the bladder neck opened. Following exclusion of patients with clinical changes that might affect imaging findings, an analysis of 28 patients demonstrated no differences between the two studies.

CONCLUSIONS

CeVUS can be used adequately in conjunction with UDS. Limitations to ceVUS include more granular imaging for bladder shape versus fluoro and inability to visualize bladder neck if residual urine is in the bladder, mitigated by bladder emptying. Benefits include ability to visualize the dynamic activity of the bladder neck due to constant imaging with ceVUS.

[Imaging in children and adolescents with urinary tract infections]

CLINICAL/METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEM

Urinary tract infections are among the most common infectious diseases in childhood. The task of imaging is to detect predisposing factors, such as urinary transport disorders, vesicoureteral reflux, as well as complications such as abscesses or pyonephrosis in addition to possible morphological changes of the kidneys and the draining urinary tract during an infection.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES

The initial diagnostic imaging technique is generally sonography. For the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux, voiding urosonography or alternatively radiological voiding cystourethrography are used. Further diagnostic workup may include scintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or, in exceptional cases, computed tomography (CT).

RECOMMENDATION FOR PRACTICE

In children and adolescents, it is of particular importance to avoid recurrent urinary tract infections and their sequelae. This requires precise imaging diagnostics, which must be performed with special consideration of radiation protection.

Parental perception of contrast enhanced voiding ultrasonography urodynamics vs fluoroscopic urodynamics

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Contrast enhanced voiding ultrasonography (ceVUS) has not been widely reported to be used during video urodynamics (UDS). We previously reported on the feasibility of this. In this study, we aimed to understand how parents perceived their child's experience of undergoing ceVUS during UDS compared to fluoroscopic (fluoro) UDS.

METHODS

Children who underwent both fluoro UDS and ceVUS UDS were recruited. Parents were asked to complete a questionnaire to evaluate their experience with both studies. Demographics including gender, age at study, and diagnosis were collected to account for differences in perception. Statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

53 patients were included: 31 girls, 22 boys. Diagnoses included myelomeningocele (67.9%), low/tethered cord (13.2%), closed spinal dysraphism (9.4%), posterior urethral valve (1.9%), cloacal anomaly (1.9%), caudal regression (1.9%), myeloschisis (1.9%), and cerebral palsy (1.9%). There was no statistical difference in mean age at fluoro UDS and ceVUS UDS (77.3 months vs 99.7 months respectively, p = 0.09). All 53 parents (100%) were satisfied/very satisfied with their ceVUS experience; 48 parents (90.6%) preferred ceVUS, 3 parents (5.7%) preferred fluoro UDS, and 2 (3.8%) were neutral. On average, parents perceived ceVUS to be more comfortable (72.7%) and produce better results (67.4%) than fluoro UDS. The majority felt that both studies allowed the same contact with their child (52.3%) and took the same amount of time (50.0%). However 29.5% felt ceVUS was faster and 34.1% felt ceVUS allowed more contact with their child (Fig. 1). 26 parents (49.1%) specifically noted no radiation as the reason why they preferred ceVUS over fluoro. The average age at ceVUS UDS was younger in those who preferred ceVUS UDS compared to those who preferred fluoro UDS (94.6 months vs 180.0 months, p = 0.03). The average age at fluoro UDS was younger in those who preferred ceVUS UDS vs fluoro UDS (73.1 months vs 144 months, p = 0.03). Gender's influence on preference approached significance (p = 0.07); all 3 parents who preferred fluoro UDS had male children.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of parents preferred ceVUS over fluoro UDS. ceVUS was perceived to be more comfortable and provide better results. Many parents highlighted no radiation and no fluoroscopic machinery as factors in preference of ceVUS over fluoro. The parents who preferred ceVUS UDS had children who had both studies done at an earlier age compared to the parents who preferred fluoro UDS.

Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the surgical treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children

BACKGROUND

To determine the utility of contrast-enhanced voiding urography (CeVUS) in the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) through ureterovesical reimplantation in children.

METHODS

A total of 159 children with recurrent urinary tract infections were selected for CeVUS and voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) from December 2018 to December 2020, among whom 78 patients were eventually diagnosed with VUR. Overall, 60 pyelo-ureteric units (PUUs) were operated according to surgical indications. Accordingly, we determined the general clinical characteristics of all children, obtained two-dimensional ultrasound images, assessed the reflux status of children using the contrast-enhanced technique, and compared the obtained results via CeVUS and VCUG. Both imaging modalities were reperformed at 6, 12, and 18 months after surgery to evaluate postoperative outcomes. In particular, we assessed the consistency of the evaluation and calculated the diagnostic efficacy of CeVUS for different levels of reflux at different time points.

RESULTS

CeVUS showed considerable efficacy in the diagnosis of children with VUR. Notably, the diagnostic results of both CeVUS and VCUG achieved high agreement, with a kappa value of 0.966 (P < 0.001). The results of our follow-up at different stages and evaluation of postoperative efficacy revealed that CeVUS possessed substantial diagnostic efficacy and good consistency with VCUG.

CONCLUSION

CeVUS is an accurate and safe examination, with considerable clinical significance for diagnosing VUR in children, determining the treatment approach, conducting follow-up during treatment, and evaluating subsequent treatment outcomes.

Vesicoureteral Reflux: Current Care Trends and Future Possibilities

Although investigations over the past 2 decades have improved our understanding of the natural history of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and helped identify those at higher risk of both VUR itself as well as its potential severe sequelae, debate exists regarding key aspects of care, including when to perform diagnostic imaging and which patients benefit from continuous antibiotic prophylaxis. Artificial intelligence and machine learning have the potential to distill large volumes of granular data into practical tools that clinicians can use to guide diagnosis and management decisions. Surgical treatment, when indicated, remains highly effective and is associated with low morbidity.

Viability of contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography as an alternative to fluoroscopy during video urodynamics

Pediatric urodynamic studies are performed to evaluate bladder function, commonly in conjunction with a voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG). Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (CeVUS) has been approved in the evaluation of vesicoureteral reflux and has been shown to have equal or superior diagnostic value to VCUG. In this technical innovation, we have shown that ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles are compatible with the equipment used for urodynamic evaluation. We have also shown that it is feasible to use contrast ultrasound in pediatric urodynamic examinations. The purpose of our study was to assess the technical feasibility of CeVUS during urodynamics with an in vitro test followed by a vivo evaluation. This single-center prospective study enrolled 25 patients aged 0-18 years who underwent CeVUS instead of VCUG at their regularly scheduled appointment. During the in vitro saline experiment, the radiologic and urologic equipment were found to be compatible. Microbubbles were observed at flow rates of 10 and 20 ml/min.

Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (CEVUS) as a safe alternate means of assessing vesicoureteral reflux in pediatric kidney transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Although voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) is currently the gold standard in VUR evaluation, there is ionizing radiation exposure. Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (CEVUS) uses ultrasound contrast agents to visualize the urinary tract and has been reported to be safe and effective in VUR evaluation in children. CEVUS application has yet to be specifically described in VUR evaluation in the pediatric kidney transplant population. The purpose of this study was to report the use of CEVUS and VCUG in evaluating and managing VUR in pediatric renal transplant patients.

METHODS

Retrospective review was conducted for pediatric kidney transplant patients (18 years and younger) who underwent VCUG or CEVUS to assess for transplant VUR from July 2019 through June 2021. Demographic information, reason for VUR evaluation, fluoroscopy time, and postimaging complications were evaluated. Costs of imaging modalities were also considered.

RESULTS

Eight patients were evaluated for transplant VUR during the study period. Of the 3 patients who underwent VCUG, all 3 had VUR (median grade 3). Median fluoroscopy time was 18 s and dose-area product was 18.7 uGy*m² . Of the 5 patients who underwent CEVUS, 4 had VUR (median grade 4). There were no complications for either modality. Based on clinical and radiographic findings, patients were recommended no intervention, behavioral modification, or ureteral reimplantation. The total cost of CEVUS was $800 less than that of VCUG.

CONCLUSION

CEVUS can provide an alternate means of safely evaluating VUR in kidney transplant patients with similar outcomes, potentially lower costs, and no exposure to ionizing radiation.

Role of Contrast-Enhanced Voiding Urosonography in the Evaluation of Renal Transplant Reflux - Comparison with Voiding Cystourethrography and a New Classification

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a common urological complication in renal transplant patients.

THE AIM

of this study is to evaluate the performance of contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (CEvUS) in the diagnosis and classification of reflux into the renal allograft, to evaluate and classify VUR into the allograft using voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) and CEvUS, to compare the two methods, and to propose a new classification of reflux into the allograft based on CEvUS and VCUG assessment, in line with the international reflux grading system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 From January 2017 to July 2019, 84 kidney transplant patients were enrolled. All patients underwent VCUG and CEvUS.

RESULTS

 In 76 cases there was agreement between VCUG and CEvUS (90 %) (Kappa = 0.7). The sensitivity of CEvUS using VCUG as the gold standard was 90 %, and the specificity was 92 %. Of the 7 cases diagnosed by VCUG and not by CEvUS, 6 were grade 1 and 1 was grade 2.

CONCLUSION

 Transplant patients with reflux symptoms should undergo CEvUS. If the outcome is negative, VCUG should be performed. The classification that we propose is better suited to describe VUR in transplant patients, because it is simpler and takes into account whether reflux occurs not only during urination but also when the bladder is relaxed.

Management of Pediatric Urinary Tract Infections: A Delphi Study

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common infectious diseases in the pediatric population and represents a major cause of antibiotic consumption and hospitalization in children. Considering the ongoing controversies on the management of pediatric UTI and the challenges due to increasing antimicrobial resistance, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the level of agreement on UTI management in pediatric age in Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy, and to assess on the basis of recent studies whether there is the need to change current recommendations used by primary care pediatricians, hospital pediatricians, and pediatric surgeons in everyday clinical practice to possibly improve outcomes. This consensus provides clear and shared indications on UTI management in pediatric age, based on the most updated literature. This work represents, in our opinion, the most complete and up-to-date collection of statements on procedures to follow for pediatric UTI, in order to guide physicians in the management of the patient, standardize approaches, and avoid abuse and misuse of antibiotics. Undoubtedly, more randomized and controlled trials are needed in the pediatric population to better define the best therapeutic management in cases with antimicrobial resistance and real usefulness of long-term antibiotic prophylaxis.

Safety considerations related to intravenous contrast agents in pediatric imaging

Intravenous contrast media are used in MRI, CT and US studies for anatomical evaluation and lesion characterization. Safety is always of paramount importance when administering any contrast media to children, and it is important for radiologists and ordering providers to be knowledgeable of the safety profiles and potential adverse events that can occur. This manuscript reviews the frequency and types of adverse events associated with intravenous contrast agents reported in the pediatric literature. Overall, intravenous contrast agents are very safe to use in children. However, familiarity with how to treat and prevent these uncommon events is crucial in preventing poor outcomes. In addition, an understanding of gadolinium deposition in tissues can help facilitate conversations with concerned physicians and parents. This review provides a concise yet comprehensive reference for radiologists and ordering providers on intravenous contrast safety considerations in the pediatric patient.

Translational research in pediatric contrast-enhanced ultrasound

The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging is being widely explored by various groups for its use in the pediatric population. Clinical implementation of new diagnostic or therapeutic techniques requires extensive and meticulous preclinical testing and evaluation. The impact of CEUS will be determined in part by the extent to which studies are oriented specifically toward a pediatric population. Rather than simply applying principles and techniques used in the adult population, these studies are expected to advance and augment preexisting knowledge with pediatric-specific information. To further develop this imaging modality for use in children, pediatric-focused preclinical research is essential. In this paper we describe the development and implementation of the pediatric-specific preclinical animal and phantom models that are being used to evaluate CEUS with the goal of clinical translation to children.

Contrast-enhanced genitosonography and colosonography: emerging alternatives to fluoroscopy

Imaging plays a crucial role in evaluating newborns and infants with cloacal and urogenital malformations. Contrast-enhanced genitosonography (ceGS) and contrast-enhanced colosonography (ceCS) are sensitive and radiation-free alternatives to fluoroscopic genitography and colography for diagnosis and surgical planning. These imaging techniques are performed by instilling a US contrast agent into specific body cavities to define the genitourinary and colorectal anatomy. This review article presents the experience with ceGS and ceCS applications in children, focusing on the background, examination technique, and interpretation of imaging findings, as well as strengths and weaknesses compared to conventional techniques.

Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography, part 1: vesicoureteral reflux evaluation

Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS) is a well-established, sensitive and safe ultrasound (US) modality for detecting and grading vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and urethral imaging in children. Nearly three decades of remarkable advances in US technology and US contrast agents have refined ceVUS's diagnostic potential. The recent approval of Lumason/SonoVue in the United States, Europe and China for pediatric intravesical applications marked the beginning of a new era for this type of contrast US imaging. Consequently, the use of ceVUS in children has expanded to multiple places around the globe. In the first part of this review article, we describe the current experience in the use of ceVUS for VUR evaluation, with an emphasis on historical background, examination technique, image interpretation and diagnostic accuracy. In the second part, we will present the role of ceVUS for urethral imaging in children.

Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography part 2: urethral imaging

Ultrasound (US) has been increasingly used as an important imaging tool to assess the urethra in children. The earliest reports of pediatric urethral sonography involved imaging the urethra in a non-voiding state, during physiological voiding of urine, and after instillation of saline. The introduction of US contrast agents has continued to improve visualization of urethral anatomy. Contrast-enhanced US of the urethra can be performed during the voiding phase of a standard contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS) exam or with retrograde instillation of a contrast agent, depending on the exam indication. Both techniques are well tolerated by children and provide accurate information about urethral pathology and periurethral soft tissues. This article reviews the technical aspects and imaging findings of urethral pathologies in children using contrast-enhanced US, both by the voiding and retrograde instillation techniques.

Starting a pediatric contrast ultrasound service: made simple!

The addition of contrast US to an existing pediatric US service requires several preparatory steps. This overview provides a guide to simplify the process. Initially, it is important to communicate to all stakeholders the justifications for pediatric contrast US, including (1) its comparable or better diagnostic results relative to other modalities; (2) its reduction in procedural sedation or anesthesia by avoiding MRI or CT; (3) its reduction or elimination of radiation exposure by not having to perform fluoroscopy or CT; (4) the higher safety profile of US contrast agents (UCA) compared to other contrast agents; (5) the improved exam comfort and ease inherent to US, leading to better patient and family experience, including bedside US exams for children who cannot be transported; (6) the need for another diagnostic option in light of increasing demand by parents and providers; and (7) its status as an approved and reimbursable exam. It is necessary to have an UCA incorporated into the pharmacy formulary noting that only SonoVue/Lumason is currently approved for pediatric use. In the United States this UCA is approved for intravenous administration for cardiac and liver imaging and for vesicoureteric reflux detection with intravesical application. In Europe and China it is only approved for the intravesical use in children. All other applications are off-label. The US scanner needs to be equipped with contrast-specific software. The UCA has to be prepared just before the exam and it is important to strictly follow the steps as outlined in the packaging inserts in order to prevent premature destruction of the microbubbles. The initial training in contrast US is best focused on the frontline staff actually performing the US studies; these might be sonographers, pediatric or interventional radiologists, or trainees. It is important from the outset to educate the referring physicians about contrast US. It is helpful to participate in existing contrast US courses, particularly those with hands-on components.

Contrast -Enhanced Ultrasound: State of the Art in North America

The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound convened a panel of specialists in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to produce a white paper on noncardiac CEUS in North America. The panel met in Chicago, Illinois, on October 24 and 25, 2017. The recommendations are based on analysis of current literature and common practice strategies and are thought to represent a reasonable approach to introduce the advantages of this safe and noninvasive technique for the benefit of our patients. Characterization of liver nodules, and pediatric vascular and intravesicular applications comprise the approved indications for CEUS in the United States. They, along with the very successful off-label use of CEUS for the kidney, are included in this publication.Other off-label uses are presented with emphasis on their value and literature support in the online version.

Assessment of distal ureteral and ureterovesical junction visualization on contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (CEVUS) uses intravesically administered microbubble contrast to detect vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and urethral anomalies with ultrasound. Multiple studies have suggested CEVUS can replace voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) as a radiation-free alternative. Analysis of the ureterovesical junction and ureters on VCUG documenting the ureterovesical junction position, ureteral duplication, periureteral diverticula and ureteroceles is important as anatomical variations may affect management and surgical approach.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to assess distal ureteral and ureterovesical junction region visualization in children with VUR detected on CEVUS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CEVUS studies performed between June 2018 and March 2019 with reported VUR were retrospectively reviewed by two pediatric radiologists to confirm VUR and to qualitatively assess the ureterovesical junction region for each renal moiety using a 3-point scale for clear, limited or absent visualization of the distal ureter, ureterovesical junction, ureteral duplication, periureteral diverticula and ureteroceles.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies with VUR on CEVUS were identified. Sixty-seven renal moieties were evaluated including a solitary kidney in one child. VUR was detected in 52 moieties by reader 1 and in 53 by reader 2. A single moiety with discrepancy between readers regarding VUR was excluded from statistical analysis. No diverticula were detected by either reader and one ureterocele was detected by both readers. Visualization of the ureterovesical junction was described as clear in 5/52, limited in 14/52 and absent in 33/52 refluxing renal moieties by reader 1 and as clear in 12/52, limited in 20/52 and absent in 20/52 by reader 2. The ureterovesical junction was clearly visualized in 5/52 (9.6%) by reader 1 and 12/52 (23.1%) by reader 2. The Kappa value of -0.29 (confidence interval [CI] -0.25, 0.21) reveals a lack of agreement between the readers for clear versus limited or absent ureterovesical junction visualization. Distal ureteral visualization was described as clear in 14/52, limited in 16/52 and absent in 22/52 refluxing renal moieties by reader 1 and as clear in 27/52, limited in 7/52 and absent in 18/52 by reader 2. The distal ureter was clearly visualized in 14/52 (26.9%) by reader 1 and 27/52 (51.9%) by reader 2. The Kappa of 0.43 (CI 0.22, 0.64) reveals moderate agreement between the readers for clear versus limited or absent distal ureteral visualization. Duplication of the renal collecting system was identified in 13/52 refluxing kidneys by reader 1 and 11/52 refluxing kidneys by reader 2. Visualization of ureteral duplication was described as clear in 9, limited in 4 and absent in 39 of 52 refluxing renal moieties by reader 1 and as clear in 9, limited in 2 and absent in 41 by reader 2. Ureteral duplication was clearly visualized in 9/52 (17.3%) by reader 1 and 9/52 (17.3%) by reader 2. Kappa of 0.87 (CI 0.68, 1) reveals high agreement between the readers for clear versus limited or absent identification of ureteral duplication.

CONCLUSION

The distal ureter and ureterovesical junction region frequently are not clearly visualized in refluxing renal moieties on CEVUS. Awareness of this limitation is important as there may be implications when evaluating patients for surgical management of VUR.

Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography in the assessment of vesical-ureteral reflux: the time has come

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a pathological condition contradistinguished by monolateral or bilateral retrograde flow of urine from the bladder to the ureter and to the kidney. If not properly recognized and treated, VUR can potentially be associated to several complications such as recurrent infections and possible secondary scars with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). Furthermore, it represents an important risk factor for nephrovascular hypertension. During the last 20 years, the diagnostic approach to this entity has passed through several, drastic changes: indeed, since its introduction in 1994 contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS) has gradually accompanied the voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) as alternative imaging technique for the diagnosis and staging of VUR. Despite a large number of papers has strongly encouraged its use in clinical practice, due to the lack of ionizing radiations and its high sensitivity rate, to date almost all the guidelines only include the VCUG for VUR diagnosis. The introduction of technologically advanced US software and the approval of the intravesical administration of ultrasound contrast agents by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and by the European Medicine Agency (EMA) have to induce the Scientific Community to a deep revaluation of the role of ceVUS in the diagnosis and follow-up of VUR: urosonography might extensively replace VCUG as the reference method, reserving to cystourethrography a role in the most complex anatomic settings for pre-surgical evaluation.

Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography in the diagnosis of intrarenal reflux

PURPOSE

Although contrast-enhanced urosonography (ceVUS) has shown capable diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children, the ability of ceVUS to detect intrarenal reflux (IRR) is considered limited. The purpose of our study is to assess the ability of ceVUS to detect IRR as well as its association with age, gender, and the grade of VUR.

METHODS

This study included 5153 children who were referred to our clinic for ceVUS. All children underwent sonographic examinations, which were performed on a LOGIQ S8 machine equipped with dedicated software for contrast-enhanced studies with harmonic imaging. Standard ultrasound of the urinary tract was followed by bladder catheterisation and instillation of physiological normal saline and the US contrast medium (SonoVue^®, Bracco).

RESULTS

VUR was diagnosed by ceVUS in 1959 out of 5153 children (38%), of whom IRR was found in 233 of 1959 children (11.9%). A total of 285 ureteral units showing IRR were found. High grades of VUR (IV + V) with IRR were found in a total of 235 of 285 (82.81%) renal units. Bilateral IRR was found in 53 patients, usually with a high-grade VUR on both sides. Most children had VUR grade IV, predominantly those < 12 months. The younger the child, the higher the likelihood of higher-grade VUR (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

ceVUS, combined with harmonic imaging and second-generation ultrasound contrast media, enabled IRR detection in almost 12% of our patients with VUR. IRR is most commonly found in children under 1 year of age with VUR grades IV and V.

Intrarenal Reflux in the Light of Contrast-Enhanced Voiding Urosonography

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of intrarenal reflux (IRR) among vesicoureteral refluxes (VURs), diagnosed by contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS), to define VURs which are positive to IRR and their locations in the kidney. Materials and Methods: Seventy patients with VURs, including 103 uretero-renal units (URUs) with VURs of grades II-V (37 URUs were excluded because of renal anomalies or absence of VUR) were examined with ceVUS due to recurrent febrile UTI or first febrile UTI accompanied by abnormalities on renal ultrasonography. Patients were examined on GE Logiq S8 ultrasound machine, using second generation of ultrasound contrast agent. Results: Out of 103 VURs, 51 (49.51%) had IRR regardless the grade of VUR, showing increase in IRR incidence with VUR severity (p < 0.0001). The median age at the time of IRR diagnosis was 5 months (IQR, 3-14.3), whereas in patients without IRR, it was 15.5 months (IQR, 5-41.5), (p = 0.0069). IRR was most common in superior pole (80%), followed by inferior pole (62.7%), and middle segments (37%), and to all segments (27%) (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: In the present study, patients with IRR-associated VUR showed earlier clinical presentation. The distribution of IRRs corresponded to the natural distribution of composed papillae types II and III, while the incidence of IRR increased with severity of VUR. Further clinical studies may point to the importance of considering IRR in the future classification of VUR.

Updated Italian recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of the first febrile urinary tract infection in young children

AIM

Our aim was to update the recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of the first febrile urinary tract infection in young children, which were endorsed in 2012 by the Italian Society of Pediatric Nephrology.

METHODS

The Italian recommendations were revised on the basis of a review of the literature published from 2012 to October 2018. We also carried out an ad hoc evaluation of the risk factors to identify children with high-grade vesicoureteral reflux or renal scarring, which were published in the previous recommendations. When evidence was not available, the working group held extensive discussions, during various meetings and through email exchanges.

RESULTS

Four major modifications have been introduced. The method for collecting urine for culture and its interpretation has been re-evaluated. We have reformulated the algorithm that guides clinical decisions to proceed with voiding cystourethrography. The suggested antibiotics have been revised, and we have recommended further restrictions of the use of antibiotic prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

These updated recommendations have now been endorsed by the Italian Society of Pediatric Nephrology and the Italian Society for Pediatric Infectivology. They can also be used to compare other recommendations that are available, as a worldwide consensus in this area is still lacking.

State-of-the-Art Renal Imaging in Children

Imaging modalities for diagnosing kidney and urinary tract disorders in children have developed rapidly over the last decade largely because of advancement of modern technology. General pediatricians and neonatologists are often the front line in detecting renal anomalies. There is a lack of knowledge of the applicability, indications, and nephrotoxic risks of novel renal imaging modalities. Here we describe the clinical impact of congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tract and describe pediatric-specific renal imaging techniques by providing a practical guideline for the diagnosis of kidney and urinary tract disorders.

Contrast-Enhanced Colosonography for the Evaluation of Children With an Imperforate Anus

This case series describes a novel method for showing the preoperative anatomy of children with anorectal malformations using ultrasound contrast, which we have termed "contrast-enhanced colosonography (ceCS)." Six patients with anorectal malformations without a perineal fistula were studied both by fluoroscopic distal colostography and ceCS, and their results were confirmed surgically. Contrast-enhanced CS precisely showed the complex anatomic relationships in all cases. Compared to traditional fluoroscopic studies, ceCS has the benefit of no associated ionizing radiation and thus is safer for children.

Shear Wave Elastography in the Evaluation of the Kidneys in Pediatric Patients with Unilateral Vesicoureteral Reflux

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the ability of shear wave elastography (SWE) to detect renal parenchymal scar formation in patients with vesicoureteral reflux.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 49 patients with unilateral grade 2 or higher-degree VUR. All patients underwent dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scintigraphy for evaluation of the renal parenchymal scar. After the DMSA scan, 2 radiologists, who were blinded to clinical data and each other's measurements, evaluated the kidneys of the patients using SWE. The kidneys were divided into 3 parts: upper pole, middle region, and lower pole, and 3 regions of interest were placed to each part. Shear wave velocity (SWV) values were calculated using meters per second as a unit and recorded for each region. Afterward, SWV values were compared to DMSA results.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the observers' mean SWV values of kidneys with VUR without scar formation (mean ± SD, 2.11 ± 0.06 and 2.09 ± 0.05 m/s) and the contralateral normal kidney SVW values (2.11 ± 0.06 and 2.10 ± 0.05 m/s; P = .936 and .724, respectively). We observed a significant difference between the mean SWV values of the kidneys with VUR accompanied by scar formation (2.28 ± 0.10 and 2.27 ± 0.11 m/s) and the mean SWV values of the contralateral normal kidneys (2.09 ± 0.05 and 2.10 ± 0.04 m/s; P < .001 for both observers).

CONCLUSIONS

Shear wave elastography could detect scar tissue in kidneys; however, the variability of the stiffness due to the kidney's complex structure, and variations in blood perfusion and the glomerular filtration rate of the kidney might limit the use of SWE in current clinical diagnostic algorithms for VUR.

Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced voiding urosonogram using second-generation contrast with harmonic imaging (CEVUS-HI) study for assessment of vesicoureteral reflux in children: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic accuracy and safety of contrast-enhanced voiding urosonogram using second-generation contrast with harmonic imaging (CEVUS-HI) in detecting vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) among children.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in March 2018. Relevant comparative studies from Medline, EMBASE, World of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL, WHO trial registry and Clinicaltrials.gov were identified and appraised using QUADAS-2. Diagnostic accuracy parameters were determined using VCUG as the reference standard. Adverse effects related to ultrasound contrast were summarized. The heterogeneity and inter-study variability were determined. After appropriate subgroup diagnostic accuracy parameters were investigated, summarizing receiver operator characteristics was constructed using the bivariate model meta-regression to determine the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies with low-high risk of bias, including 1917 ureteral units from 953 patients were assessed for this meta-analysis. The included studies reported no serious adverse events associated with the ultrasound contrast. The pooled diagnostic accuracy parameters of CEVUS-HI in detecting VUR amongst children were: sensitivity 90.43 (95% CI 90.36-90.50), specificity 92.82 (95% CI 92.76-92.87), the calculated (+) likelihood-ratio 12.59 (95% CI 12.49-12.68), (-) likelihood-ratio of 0.103 (95% CI 0.102-0.104) and extrapolated pooled diagnostic odds-ratio was 122.12 (95% CI 120.75-123.49). Heterogeneity with interstudy variability was noted (p < 0.0001, I-squared > 70%). The AUC was determined to be 0.965 for VUR detection.

CONCLUSIONS

The pooled diagnostic accuracy parameters from low-moderate quality of evidence have illustrated that the CEVUS-HI study has an excellent safety profile and acceptable diagnostic accuracy. It may be considered as an alternative diagnostic modality for assessment of VUR among children.

A Low-Cost, Durable and Re-Usable Bladder Phantom: Teaching Intravesical Ultrasound Contrast Administration

Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS) is a radiation-free and highly sensitive examination for detecting vesicoureteral reflux and imaging the urethra in children. This examination is performed with ultrasound and intravesical administration of a gas-filled microbubble US contrast agent. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently approved the use of a US contrast agent for ceVUS in children. Because of the growing interest among physicians and US technologists in using ceVUS in children, a urinary bladder phantom was developed to teach intravesical ultrasound contrast administration to perform ceVUS procedures. Described here are the preparation and utility of a low-cost, durable and re-usable phantom that simulates the administration, distribution and effects of different US parameters on US contrast agent appearance in the bladder during ceVUS in children.

3D/4D contrast-enhanced urosonography (ceVUS) in children - is it superior to the 2D technique?

Background: By now, two-dimensional contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS) has become a well-established method for the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of vesicoureteral reflux in children, particularly after the recent approval for this application in children in the USA and in Europe. The introduction of three-dimensional static (3D) and real-time (4D) techniques with ultrasound contrast agents opens up new diagnostic opportunities for this imaging modality. Objective: To analyze whether 3D and 4D ceVUS is a superior technique compared to standard 2D ceVUS in diagnosing vesicoureteral reflux in children. Material and methods: The study included 150 patients (mean age 3.7 years) who underwent 2D and 3D/4D ceVUS for the diagnosis and grading of vesicoureteral reflux. Results: 2D ceVUS and 3D/4D ceVUS diagnosed the same number of vesicoureteral refluxes, however, there was a statistically significant difference in grading between the two methods. Performing 3D/4D ceVUS resulted in changing the initial grade compared to 2D ceVUS in 19 out of 107 refluxing units (17.76%) diagnosed. The 4D technique enabled a more conspicuous visualization of vesicoureteral reflux than the 3D technique. Conclusions: 2D ceVUS and 3D/4D ceVUS diagnosed the same number of vesicoureteral refluxes, however, there was a statistically significant difference in grading between the two methods. Thus 3D/4D ceVUS appears at least a valid, if not even a more conspicuous technique compared to 2D ceVUS.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging is a recently approved technique in the United States that uses a specific contrast agent, namely, microbubbles, consisting mainly of a gas core and a stabilized biological shell. These compounds allow for the visualization of small vascular beds and improve characterization of anatomic structures and lesions. They have a relatively safe profile and are primarily excreted through the lungs.

Contrast-enhanced Voiding Urosonography for Vesicoureteral Reflux Diagnosis in Children

Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS) is a dynamic imaging technique that makes it possible to study the structure of the urinary tract after the administration of intravesical contrast material. Initially, ceVUS was indicated mainly to study vesicoureteral reflux (VUR); however, since the ability of ceVUS to depict the structure of the urethra was demonstrated in both sexes, ceVUS is now indicated for examination of the entire urinary tract. The main benefit of ceVUS is that it does not use ionizing radiation. In recent years, fundamental changes have occurred in the understanding of VUR. The lessening effect of VUR and the low rate of occurrence of urethral pathologic conditions have given rise to changes in the indications for tests for these conditions. In addition to being able to help confirm a diagnosis of VUR, the ceVUS technique can be used to depict obstructive and nonobstructive urethral pathologic conditions, as well as normal variants, on high-quality images. Furthermore, ceVUS enables real-time assessment of voiding function. For these reasons, ceVUS should be not only an alternative to voiding cystourethrography, but also the technique of choice for the study of the entire urinary tract in pediatric patients. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2017.

Comparison of contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography with voiding cystourethrography in pediatric vesicoureteral reflux

OBJECTIVE

Voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) has been considered as the gold standard technique for the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). But, it requires fluoroscopic guidance which expose children to radiation. Voiding urosonography (VUS) is technically analogous to VCUG and has the major advantage of zero radiation exposure. This study aims to determine the efficacy of contrast enhanced-VUS (ce-VUS) with respect to VCUG in diagnosing VUR.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study involves 30 children over a period of 3 years. All patients underwent a VCUG followed by the ce-VUS on the same day. All VUS studies were done by the same sonologist in the sonography department. The images were recorded and reviewed by the same sonologist before reporting.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 51.53 months. There were 21 males and 9 females. On VCUG, 16 patients had no reflux, and 14 patients had reflux. On ce-VUS, 14 patients had no VUR, and 16 patients had VUR. Of the total 58 kidney-ureter units (KUUs), VUR was detected in 17 KUUs on VCUG and in 21 KUUs on ce-VUS. Thus, ce-VUS detected 4 refluxing units that were not seen on VCUG. In right KUUs, ce-VUS detected VUR in 3 units where no reflux was found in VCUG. In the 28 left KUUs, 25 units on ce-VUS showed concordance with the grade of VUR as detected by VCUG; 3 were discordant. Two units on ce-VUS showed a VUR one grade higher than the corresponding grade on VCUG and in one unit it was one grade lower. Thus, in total, ce-VUS picked up 4 cases which were missed by VCUG.

CONCLUSION

ce-VUS is a good imaging modality when compared to voiding cystourethrography to assess pediatric vesicoureteral reflux, in view of its superior diagnostic performance, feasibility and radiation safety for children.

Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS) with the intravesical administration of the ultrasound contrast agent Optison™ for vesicoureteral reflux detection in children: a prospective clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS) is widely used outside the United States to diagnose vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children and is highly sensitive while avoiding exposure to ionizing radiation. At the onset of this study, two ultrasound (US) contrast agents were available in the United States. Pediatric safety data for intravenous administration was published for one, Optison™.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and safety of ceVUS using Optison™ and compare its diagnostic efficacy with voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) for VUR detection and grading in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The United States Food and Drug Administration and institutional Investigational New Drug authorizations were obtained to conduct a prospective comparative study of ceVUS with Optison™ and VCUG. CeVUS was performed with intravesical administration of 0.2% Optison™/normal saline solution. A standard VCUG followed. Safety assessment included physical examination, and heart rate, pulse oximetry and adverse reactions monitoring before, during and immediately after the examinations. A follow-up questionnaire was completed by telephone 48-h after the studies.

RESULTS

Sixty-two pelviureteric units were studied in 30 patients with a mean age of 3.5 years (range: 0.1-17 years) including 21 girls and 9 boys. No severe adverse events occurred. All patients had normal heart rate and blood oxygenation saturation prior to, during and after the studies. At the 48-h follow-up, one patient (3.3%) reported transient dysuria. Taking the VCUG as the reference standard, ceVUS had a sensitivity of 91.7% (95%; confidence interval [CI]: 61.5%-99.8%) and specificity of 98% (95%; CI: 89.4%-99.9%). The concordance between ceVUS and VCUG for VUR detection and grading was 84.3% and 81.8%, respectively. VUR grades were discrepant in 4/11 refluxing pelviureteric units, with VCUG upgrading VUR in 2.

CONCLUSION

Detection of VUR with Optison™ ceVUS was comparable to VCUG without exposure to ionizing radiation. CeVUS with Optison™ is a well-tolerated diagnostic procedure with a favorable safety profile.

How to perform Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS)

"How to perform contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)" provides general advice on the use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) for clinical decision-making and reviews technical parameters for optimal CEUS performance. CEUS techniques vary between centers, therefore, experts from EFSUMB, WFUMB and from the CEUS LI-RADS working group created a discussion forum to standardize the CEUS examination technique according to published evidence and best personal experience. The goal is to standardise the use and administration of UCAs to facilitate correct diagnoses and ultimately to improve the management and outcomes of patients.

The duplicated collecting system of the urinary tract: embryology, imaging appearances and clinical considerations

Duplication anomalies of the urinary collecting system are common and can be discovered and characterized with multiple imaging modalities. The embryology, imaging manifestations and clinical ramifications of duplicated ureters and renal collecting systems vary from a normal anatomical variant to urological pathology and are discussed and illustrated in this review.

Voiding Urosonography with Second-Generation Ultrasound Contrast Agent for Diagnosis of Vesicoureteric Reflux: First Local Pilot Study

BACKGROUND:

Vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) is an important association of paediatric urinary tract infection (UTI) found in 30-50% of all children presenting with first UTI. Contrast-enhanced voiding ultrasonography (ceVUS) has become an important radiation-free method for VUR detection in children. Its sensitivity in detecting VUR has greatly improved due to the development of the contrast-specific ultrasound techniques and the introduction of the second-generation ultrasound contrast agent, superseding the diagnostic accuracy of standard radiological procedures.

AIM:

This article aimed to summarise the current literature and discuss the first local pilot study performed in our institution on detection of vesicoureteric reflux by contrast-enhanced voiding ultrasonography with second- generation agent (SonoVue, Bracco, Italy).

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

Retrospective review of the first 31 ceVUS (24 girls, 7 boys) was presented. Age range was 2 months to 18 years (mean = 6.4 ± 4.9).

RESULTS:

All examinations were well tolerated without any adverse incident. VUR was shown in 20 (64.5%) children in 32/62 (51.6) nephroureteral units (NUUs). In 18 NUUs, VUR was grade II/V, in 11 Grade III/V and in 3 grade IV/V, respectively. Urethra was shown in 19/31 children and in all boys, without pathological finding. In two girls spinning top urethra has been detected. Subsequent urodynamic studies revealed functional bladder problem in both.

CONCLUSIONS:

Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography using intravesical second generation ultrasound contrast agent could be recommend as a valid alternative diagnostic modality for detecting vesicoureteral reflux and evaluation of the distal urinary tract in children, based on its radiation-free, highly efficacious, reliable, and safe characteristics.

Off-label-use of sulfur-hexafluoride in voiding urosonography for diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux in children: A survey on adverse events

AIM

To evaluate the risk profile of sulfur hexafluoride in voiding urosonography (VUS) based on a large cohort of children.

METHODS

Since 2011 sulfur hexafluoride (SH, SonoVue^®, Bracco, Italy) is the only ultrasound contrast available in the European Union and its use in children has not been approved. Within a 4-year-period, 531 children with suspected or proven vesicoureteral reflux (f/m = 478/53; mean age 4.9 years; 1 mo-25.2 years) following parental informed consent underwent VUS with administration of 2.6 ± 1.2 mL SH in a two-center study. A standardized telephone survey on adverse events was conducted three days later.

RESULTS

No acute adverse reactions were observed. The survey revealed subacute, mostly self-limited adverse events in 4.1% (22/531). The majority of observed adverse events (17/22) was not suspected to be caused by an allergic reaction: Five were related to catheter placement, three to reactivated urinary tract infections, five were associated with perineal disinfection before voiding urosonography or perineal dermatitis and four with a common cold. In five patients (0.9%) hints to a potential allergic cause were noted: Perineal urticaria was reported in three interviews and isolated, mild fever in two. These were minor self-limited adverse events with a subacute onset and no hospital admittance was necessary. Ninety-six point two percent of the parents would prefer future VUS examinations with use of SH.

CONCLUSION

No severe adverse events were observed and indications of self-limited minor allergic reactions related to intravesical administration of SH were reported in less than 1%.

Feasibility of Retrograde Ureteral Contrast Injection to Guide Ultrasonographic Percutaneous Renal Access in the Nondilated Collecting System

OBJECTIVES

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has become increasingly utilized. Patients with nondilated collecting systems represent a challenge: the target calix is often difficult to visualize. Here we report pilot study results for retrograde ultrasound contrast injection to aid in percutaneous renal access during ultrasound-guided PCNL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From April to July 2016, consecutive patients over the age of 18 years with nondilated collecting systems on preoperative imaging who presented for PCNL were enrolled. B-mode ultrasound imaging was compared with contrast-enhanced mode with simultaneous retrograde injection of Optison™ via an ipsilateral ureteral catheter.

RESULTS

Five patients (four males and one female) with renal stones underwent PCNL with retrograde ultrasound contrast injection during the study period. Mean body mass index was 28.3 ± 5.6 kg/m² and mean stone size was 24.5 ± 12.0 mm. Under B-mode ultrasound, all patients demonstrated nondilated renal collecting systems that appeared as hyperechoic areas, where it was difficult to identify a target calix for puncture. Retrograde contrast injection facilitated delineation of all renal calices initially difficult to visualize under B-mode ultrasound. Renal puncture was then performed effectively in all cases with a mean puncture time of 55.4 ± 44.8 seconds. All PCNL procedures were completed without intraoperative complications and no adverse events related to ultrasound contrast injection occurred.

CONCLUSION

Retrograde ultrasound contrast injection as an aide for renal puncture during PCNL is a feasible technique. By improving visualization of the collecting system, it facilitates needle placement in challenging patients without hydronephrosis. Future larger scale studies comparing its use to standard ultrasound-guided technique will be required to validate this concept.

[Imaging in urinary tract infections in childhood]

Diagnostic strategies for extended morphological and functional clarification after symptomatic urinary tract infections in children are changing. Improved knowledge of the causes for development of renal scarring and a changing view on the importance of vesicoureteral reflux have led to a change in paradigm in recent years. The purpose of this article is to present the ongoing discussions of the causes and outcome of childhood urinary tract infections, competing diagnostic imaging methods and different diagnostic algorithms.

Feasibility of Antegrade Contrast-enhanced US Nephrostograms to Evaluate Ureteral Patency

Purpose To demonstrate the feasibility of contrast material-enhanced ulrasonographic (US) nephrostograms to assess ureteral patency after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in this proof-of-concept study. Materials and Methods For this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved prospective blinded pilot study, patients undergoing PCNL provided consent to undergo contrast-enhanced US and fluoroscopic nephrostograms on postoperative day 1. For contrast-enhanced US, 1.5 mL of Optison (GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway) microbubble contrast agent solution (perflutren protein-type A microspheres) was injected via the nephrostomy tube. Unobstructed antegrade ureteral flow was defined by the presence of contrast material in the bladder. Contrast-enhanced US results were compared against those of fluoroscopic nephrostograms for concordance. Results Ten studies were performed in nine patients (four women, five men). Contrast-enhanced US demonstrated ureteral patency in eight studies and obstruction in two. One patient underwent two studies, one showing obstruction and the second showing patency. Concordance between US and fluoroscopic assessments of ureteral patency was evaluated by using a Clopper-Pearson exact binomial test. These results were perfectly concordant with fluoroscopic nephrostogram results, with a 95% confidence interval of 69.2% and 100%. No complications or adverse events related to contrast-enhanced US occurred. Conclusion Contrast-enhanced US nephrostograms are simple to perform and are capable of demonstrating both patency and obstruction of the ureter. The perfect concordance with fluoroscopic results across 10 studies demonstrated here is not sufficient to establish diagnostic accuracy of this technique, but motivates further, larger scale investigation. If subsequent larger studies confirm these preliminary results, contrast-enhanced US may provide a safer, more convenient way to evaluate ureteral patency than fluoroscopy. ^© RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Residual intravesical iodinated contrast: a potential cause of false-negative reflux study at contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography

A 9-month-old girl underwent conventional cyclic voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) followed immediately by cyclic contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS). Although the VCUG showed unilateral grade II reflux, the ceVUS showed no reflux. Images from the ceVUS showed posterior dependent layering of the denser iodinated contrast in the bladder. This layering likely prevented reflux of US microbubbles resulting in a false-negative ceVUS. To our knowledge, this potential pitfall has not yet been reported.