1
|
Arlen AM, Amin J, Leong T. Voiding cystourethrogram: Who gets a cyclic study and does it matter? J Pediatr Urol 2022; 18:378-382. [PMID: 35241383 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) images the urethra and bladder during both bladder filling and emptying, as well as the ureters and kidneys when vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is present. Given the variation in VCUG technique and reporting, the American Academy of Pediatrics Sections on Urology and Radiology published a joint standardized VCUG protocol in 2016, which included the recommendation of at least 2 voiding cycles to identify intermittent VUR and/or ureteral ectopia. STUDY DESIGN VCUG were assessed for adherence to performance of cyclic study. Children who underwent cyclic evaluation were compared to those who underwent a single cycle VCUG. Radiation dosage was also analyzed. Studies performed on patients >18 years of age and those obtained as part of a trauma evaluation were excluded from study. RESULTS Two hundred and eighty-four VCUGs were analyzed, 97 (34.2%) were positive for VUR on the initial cycle. Of the remaining 187 studies, 116 (62%) had multiple filling-voiding cycles while in 71 (38%) only a single cycle was performed. One hundred and sixty-one (86.1%) were negative for vesicoureteral reflux. Twenty-six (13.9%) children were diagnosed with VUR after the initial filling-voiding cycle: 6 were diagnosed with grade I, 2 grade II, 11 grade III, 2 grade IV and 5 grade V. Of the 123 total children found to have VUR, 26 (21.2%) were diagnosed after an initial negative cycle. Younger children were significantly more likely to have a cyclic study performed; mean age of patients undergoing a cyclic study was 1.09 ± 2.16 years versus 3.86 ± 4.5 years (p ≤ 0.0001). Categorically, 74.1% of children less than 1 year of age underwent a cyclic study compared to 6.9% of children older than 5 years of age (p ≤ 0.0001). There was no difference based on sex with 49.1% of males and 50.9% of females (p = 0.667) undergoing cyclic evaluation. Children undergoing a cyclic study had lower median radiation dose 2.15 microGy m2 (range 0.09-111) compared to 4.41 (range 1.3-104) [p = 0.01]. DISCUSSION Vesicoureteral reflux may occur intermittently and cyclic VCUG is thought to enhance the ability to detect reflux. In our cohort, 26 children (9.2%) were only diagnosed after an additional cycle - ie 21.1% of reflux would have been missed had a cyclic study not been performed. The majority of these patients (69.2%, 18 of 26) were found to have dilating, and thus perhaps more clinically significant, reflux. Our study highlights the importance of obtaining as much information as possible and adhering to the standardized VCUG protocol. CONCLUSION Younger children are more likely to undergo cyclic VCUG. While most reflux is detected with the initial filling-voiding cycle, 26 (21.2%) patients were diagnosed after an initial negative cycle with the majority being dilating VUR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela M Arlen
- Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Jay Amin
- Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Traci Leong
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Standardized protocol for voiding cystourethrogram: Are recommendations being followed? J Pediatr Urol 2021; 17:66.e1-66.e6. [PMID: 33127304 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 10/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) images the urethra and bladder during filling and emptying, as well as ureters and kidneys when vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is present, providing detailed information about both anatomical and functional status of the urinary tract. Given the importance of information obtained, and the varying quality depending on VCUG technique and radiology reporting, the American Academy of Pediatrics Sections on Urology and Radiology published a joint standardized VCUG protocol in 2016. OBJECTIVE We compared VCUG reports from multiple institutions before and after publication of the protocol to determine adherence to recommendations. STUDY DESIGN VCUG reports generated during two separate time periods were assessed - before and after publication - to evaluate impact of the protocol. Adherence to the reporting template was evaluated. Studies performed on patients >18 years of age and those obtained for trauma evaluation were excluded from study. RESULTS A total of 3121 VCUG reports were analyzed, 989 (31.7%) were generated before and 2132 (68.3%) after protocol publication. Comparing cohorts, there was no difference in gender (62.6% female versus 61.4%; p = 0.53) though children in the post-cohort were slightly older (3.34 ± 3.82 versus 3.68 ± 4.19 years; p = 0.03). A significant increase in scout image reporting (91.5%) and cyclic studies (20.5%) were observed in the post-cohort, in comparison to 79.2% and 13.1%, respectively, in the pre-protocol cohort (p < 0.001) [Figure]. Measured PVR and recorded infused volume actually decreased between study periods (84.7% vs 72.8% and 97.2% vs 91.5%, p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between VUR grade reporting (99.4 vs 98.5%, p = 0.25). Recorded volume in which reflux occurred increased between periods (0.6% vs 2.3%, p < 0.05), while reporting of filling vs voiding reflux decreased in the post-cohort (84.4% pre-vs 77.4% post-protocol, p < 0.008). DISCUSSION The 2016 VCUG protocol recommended inclusion of various data points, however the volume at which reflux occurs remained vastly underreported. Timing of reflux has been shown to predict likelihood of spontaneous resolution and risk of breakthrough urinary tract infection; thus, its omission may limit the information used to counsel families and provide individualized care. CONCLUSION Despite consensus on standard VCUG protocol to best perform and record data, reports remain inconsistent. While VUR grade is routinely reported, other important anatomic and functional findings which are known to impact resolution and breakthrough urinary tract infection rates, such as volume at which reflux occurs, are consistently underreported.
Collapse
|
3
|
Radiology reporting of micturating cystourethrograms (MCUGs): What the paediatric urologists want to know. J Pediatr Urol 2020; 16:790.e1-790.e6. [PMID: 33011087 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Revised: 09/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Micturating cystourethrograms (MCUGs) are commonly requested to exclude vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Useful additional information including timing and bladder volume at the start of reflux, urethral anomalies and post-void drainage can be obtained from the cystograms, but are not routinely reported by radiologists. OBJECTIVE The study aim was to retrospectively review MCUG reports against a proposed reporting proforma, and then re-analyse the effect of the proforma on report quality. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective analysis of paediatric MCUG reports was undertaken from two patient cohorts. Cohorts A (41 reports) and B (51 reports) comprised reports written before (2011-12) and following (2016-17) distribution of the standardised reporting proforma, respectively. Reports were assessed with respect to the parameters outlined on the standardised MCUG reporting proforma, including presence, grade and timing of VUR amongst others. Findings from both cohorts were compared and statistically analysed (p < 0.05 significant) to establish if the proforma influenced the content of reports. RESULTS Statistically significant improvements were demonstrated in the reporting of: bladder outline normal/abnormal - reported in 92% after the proforma vs 56% before (p < 0.001); urethra normal/abnormal - 87% vs 68% (p = 0.033); contrast volume instilled - 84% vs 61% (p = 0.011); bladder emptying - 69% vs 17% (p < 0.001). In patients with VUR, reporting of VUR timing - 96% vs 33% (p < 0.001) and VUR grade - 91% vs 40% (p = 0.002) were also significantly improved. CONCLUSION Implementation of a standardised MCUG reporting proforma produced substantial improvements in report quality and consistency, with statistically significant improvements noted in six of seven key features.
Collapse
|
4
|
Haid B, Thüminger J, Lusuardi L, de Jong TPVM, Oswald J. Is there a need for endoscopic evaluation in symptomatic boys with an unsuspicious urethra on VCUG? A consideration of secondary radiologic signs of posterior urethral valves. World J Urol 2020; 39:271-279. [PMID: 32232556 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03175-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A significant proportion of PUV becomes symptomatic after the perinatal period. Voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) often fails to identify PUVs. This study evaluates the relationship between the radiological appearance of the posterior urethra, potential secondary radiological signs and endoscopically documented PUV in boys with febrile UTIs, VUR, refractory symptoms of bladder overactivity or suggestive sonography findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data on VCUG findings and endoscopy from 92 boys (mean age 27 months) who underwent endoscopic PUV incision between 2012 and 2017 following a VCUG were reviewed. 24 boys with endoscopically unsuspicious urethras were included as control group (mean age 27.5 months). Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS In patients with PUV, the urethra was suspicious on a preoperative VCUG in 45.7%, whereas it appeared normal in 54.3%. Abortive forms of PUV were more frequently found in patients with a radiologically unsuspicious urethra (30%vs.16.7%, p = 0.15). Bladder neck hypertrophy on VCUG (16.7%vs.60.9%, OR 7.5, p < 0.001), a trabeculated bladder on VCUG (72%vs.37.5%, OR 4.3, p < 0.001) and a hypertrophied musculus interuretericus (38%vs.4.2%, OR 11.7, p < 0.001) were more common in patients with PUV and urethras appearing normal on VCUG as compared to controls. CONCLUSION Unsuspicious findings of the urethra on VCUG cannot exclude a relevant PUV and implicate a risk of disregarding abortive forms. The presence of secondary radiologic signs of infravesical obstruction on a VCUG despite an unsuspicious posterior urethra in boys with recurrent UTI's as well as refractory symptoms of bladder overactivity or suggestive signs on sonography must be further clarified endoscopically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard Haid
- Department for Pediatric Urology, Ordensklinikum Linz, Hospital of the Sisters of Charity, Seilerstätte 4, 4020, Linz, Austria. .,Department of Urology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
| | - Jonas Thüminger
- Department for Pediatric Urology, Ordensklinikum Linz, Hospital of the Sisters of Charity, Seilerstätte 4, 4020, Linz, Austria
| | - Lukas Lusuardi
- Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Tom P V M de Jong
- Department of Pediatric Urology, University Children's Hospitals UMC Utrecht and Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Josef Oswald
- Department for Pediatric Urology, Ordensklinikum Linz, Hospital of the Sisters of Charity, Seilerstätte 4, 4020, Linz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Arlen AM, Cooper CS. New trends in voiding cystourethrography and vesicoureteral reflux: Who, when and how? Int J Urol 2019; 26:440-445. [PMID: 30762254 DOI: 10.1111/iju.13915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Accepted: 01/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Vesicoureteral reflux, retrograde flow of urine from the bladder into the upper urinary tract, is one of the most common urological diagnoses in the pediatric population. Diagnosis and subsequent management of urinary reflux have become increasingly debated in the past decade, with divergent opinions over which patients should be evaluated for reflux, and when detected, which children should receive intervention. Although some argue that vesicoureteral reflux is a "phenotype" that often resolves without intervention, others contest that untreated reflux has the potential to cause irreversible renal damage over time. Voiding cystourethrogram images the urethra and bladder during both bladder filling and emptying, as well as the ureters and kidneys when reflux is present, and is considered the gold standard for diagnosing vesicoureteral reflux. Once detected, therapeutic options for urinary reflux are diverse, ranging from observation with or without low-dose antibiotic prophylaxis to a variety of operative interventions. Management should be based on a multitude of factors including patient age, risk of subsequent urinary tract infections, risk of renal parenchymal injury, a given child's projected clinical course and parental preference. Over the past two decades, investigators have elucidated many crucial voiding cystourethrogram findings in addition to grade that provide significant prognostic information and are useful in determining the best course of action for a child on a more individualized basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela M Arlen
- Department of Urology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Christopher S Cooper
- Department of Urology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Johnin K, Kobayashi K, Tsuru T, Yoshida T, Kageyama S, Kawauchi A. Pediatric voiding cystourethrography: An essential examination for urologists but a terrible experience for children. Int J Urol 2018; 26:160-171. [PMID: 30569659 DOI: 10.1111/iju.13881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Voiding cystourethrography is the most important fluoroscopic examination in pediatric urology for the investigation of lower urogenital tract diseases, such as vesicoureteral reflux or urethral stricture. However, this invasive procedure imposes a significant burden on children and their parents, and recently there has been a paradigm shift in the diagnosis and treatment of vesicoureteral reflux. In the 2011 revision, the American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines on urinary tract infection recommended abandoning routine voiding cystourethrography after the first febrile urinary tract infection. In 2014, the randomized intervention for children with vesicoureteral reflux study recommended discontinuation of routine continuous antibiotic prophylaxis for vesicoureteral reflux. The time is now ripe to radically reconsider indications for voiding cystourethrography and the procedure itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuyoshi Johnin
- Department of Urology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan
| | - Kenichi Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan
| | - Teruhiko Tsuru
- Department of Urology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Yoshida
- Department of Urology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan
| | - Susumu Kageyama
- Department of Urology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan
| | - Akihiro Kawauchi
- Department of Urology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sinha R, Saha S, Maji B, Tse Y. Antibiotics for performing voiding cystourethrogram: a randomised control trial. Arch Dis Child 2018; 103:230-234. [PMID: 28855226 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2017] [Revised: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 08/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether antibiotic reduces voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG)-associated urinary tract infection (UTI). DESIGN Open-labelled randomised controlled trial. SETTING Tertiary paediatric nephrology centre. PATIENTS 120 children (age 2 months-5 years) undergoing VCUG. INTERVENTIONS Children were randomised into group A (antibiotic, n=72) or group B (no antibiotic, n=48) in 3:2 ratio. Group A received oral antibiotic (cephalexin if <6 months or co-trimoxazole if >6 months old) a day prior to VCUG and continued for 1 day post VCUG. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The main outcome measure is incidence of VCUG-associated UTI. Urine was checked on day 3 after VCUG and UTI was defined as significant growth of a single organism in a symptomatic child. RESULTS The median age was 8 months (IQR 13 months) with 68% male. Indication for undertaking VCUG was history of UTI (first UTI in infancy=43, recurrent UTI=49) and congenital anomaly of kidney and urinary tract without any UTI (n=28). Post-VCUG UTI was significantly higher among group B in comparison to group A (17% (n=8) vs 1.4% (n=1); p=0.01, OR=14.2 (95% CI 1.7 to 117)). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis found an abnormal pre-VCUG ultrasound scan to be a significant independent risk factor for post-VCUG UTI (p=0.02, OR=9.51, 95% CI 1.43 to 63.4). The number needed to treat with antibiotic to prevent one post-VCUG UTI was 6.5, which reduced to 4 if only the group with abnormal pre-VCUG ultrasound scan was included. CONCLUSIONS Antibiotic significantly reduces post-VCUG-acquired UTI especially in those with abnormal ultrasound scans. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Clinical Trial Registry of India: CTRI/2017/03/00824.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajiv Sinha
- Paediatric Nephro-Urology unit, Advanced Medical Research Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal.,Paediatric Nephrology, Institute of Child Health, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Subhasis Saha
- Paediatric Nephro-Urology unit, Advanced Medical Research Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal
| | - Biplab Maji
- Paediatric Nephro-Urology unit, Advanced Medical Research Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal.,Paediatric Nephrology, Institute of Child Health, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Yincent Tse
- Paediatric Nephrology, Great North Children Hospital, Newcastle, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Validation of the ureteral diameter ratio for predicting early spontaneous resolution of primary vesicoureteral reflux. J Pediatr Urol 2017; 13:383.e1-383.e6. [PMID: 28256423 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2016] [Accepted: 01/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE Management of primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) remains controversial, and reflux grade currently constitutes an important prognostic factor. Previous reports have demonstrated that distal ureteral diameter ratio (UDR) may be more predictive of outcome than vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) grade. We performed an external validation study in young children, evaluating early spontaneous resolution rates relative to reflux grade and UDR. STUDY DESIGN Voiding cystourethrograms (VCUGs) were reviewed. UDR was computed by measuring largest ureteral diameter within the pelvis and dividing by the distance between the L1 and L3 vertebral bodies (Figure). VUR grade and UDR were tested in univariate and multivariable analyses. Primary outcome was status of VUR at last clinical follow-up (i.e. resolution, persistence, or surgical intervention). Demographics, VUR timing, laterality, and imaging indication were also assessed. RESULTS One-hundred and forty-seven children (98 girls, 49 boys) were diagnosed with primary VUR at a mean age of 5.5 ± 4.7 months. Sixty-seven (45.6%) resolved spontaneously, 55 (37.4%) had persistent disease, and 25 (17%) were surgically corrected. Patients who spontaneously resolved had significantly lower VUR grade, refluxed later during bladder filling, and had significantly lower UDR. In a multivariable model, grade of VUR (p = 0.001), age <12 months (p = 0.008), ureteral diameter (p = 0.02), and UDR (p < 0.0001) achieved statistical significance. For every 0.1 unit increase in UDR, there was a 2.6 (95% CI 1.58-4.44) increased odds of persistent VUR, whereas a 1.6 (95% CI 0.9-3.0) increased odds was observed for every unit increase in grade. DISCUSSION Both grade of reflux and UDR were statistically significant in a multivariable model; however, UDR had a higher likelihood ratio and was more predictive of early spontaneous resolution than grade alone. Furthermore, unlike traditional VUR grading where children with grade 1-5 may outgrow reflux depending on other factors, there appears to be a consistent UDR cutoff whereby patients are unlikely to resolve. In the present study, no child with a UDR greater than 0.43 experienced early spontaneous resolution, and only three (4.5%) of those with spontaneous resolution had a UDR above 0.35. CONCLUSIONS UDR correlates with reflux grade, and is predictive of early resolution in children with primary VUR. UDR is an objective measurement of VUR, and provides valuable prognostic information about spontaneous resolution, facilitating more individualized patient care.
Collapse
|
9
|
Phillips B, Holzmer S, Turco L, Mirzaie M, Mause E, Mause A, Person A, Leslie SW, Cornell DL, Wagner M, Bertellotti R, Asensio JA. Trauma to the bladder and ureter: a review of diagnosis, management, and prognosis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2017; 43:763-773. [PMID: 28730297 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-017-0817-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2017] [Accepted: 07/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Injuries to the ureter or bladder are relatively rare. Therefore, a high level of clinical suspicion and knowledge of operative anatomy is of utmost importance for their management. Herein, a review of the literature related to the modern diagnosis, management, and prognosis for bladder and ureteral injuries is presented. METHODS A literature search was conducted through PubMed. A thorough search of the world's literature published in English was completed. Search terms included "injury, diagnosis, prognosis, and management for ureter and bladder". All years, both genders, as well as penetrating, blunt, and iatrogenic mechanisms were evaluated for inclusion. Following PRISMA guidelines, studies were selected based on relevance and then categorized. RESULTS 172 potentially relevant studies were identified. Given our focus on modern diagnosis and treatment, we then narrowed the studies in each category to those published within the last 30 years, resulting in a total of 26 studies largely consisting of Level IV retrospective case series. Our review found that bladder ruptures occur from penetrating, blunt, or iatrogenic mechanisms, and most are extraperitoneal (63%). Ureteral injuries are incurred from penetrating mechanisms in 77% of cases. The overall mortality rates for bladder rupture and ureteral injury were 8 and 7%, respectively. LIMITATIONS Limitations of this article are similar to all PRISMA-guided review articles: the dependence on previously published research and availability of references. CONCLUSION The bladder is injured far more often than the ureter but ureteral injuries have higher injury severity. Both of these organs can be damaged by penetrating, blunt, or iatrogenic mechanisms and surgical intervention is often required for severe ureter or bladder injuries. Since symptoms of these injuries may not always be apparent, a high level of suspicion is required for appropriate diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Phillips
- Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA. .,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Urology, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA. .,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Clinical and Translational Science, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA. .,Vice Chair of Surgery, Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, 601 North 30th Street, Suite 3701, Omaha, 68131-2137, NE, USA.
| | - S Holzmer
- Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Urology, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Clinical and Translational Science, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - L Turco
- Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Urology, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Clinical and Translational Science, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - M Mirzaie
- Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Urology, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Clinical and Translational Science, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - E Mause
- Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Urology, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Clinical and Translational Science, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - A Mause
- Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Urology, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Clinical and Translational Science, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - A Person
- Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Urology, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Clinical and Translational Science, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - S W Leslie
- Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Urology, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - D L Cornell
- Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Urology, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Clinical and Translational Science, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - M Wagner
- Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Urology, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Clinical and Translational Science, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - R Bertellotti
- Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Urology, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Clinical and Translational Science, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - J A Asensio
- Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Urology, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.,Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Clinical and Translational Science, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schaeffer AJ, Chow JS, Ivanova A, Cui G, Greenfield SP, Zerin JM, Hoberman A, Mathews RI, Mattoo TK, Carpenter MA, Moxey-Mims M, Chesney RW, Nelson CP. Variation in the level of detail in pediatric voiding cystourethrogram reports. J Pediatr Urol 2017; 13:257-262. [PMID: 28277235 PMCID: PMC9771522 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2016] [Accepted: 08/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) provides a wealth of data on urinary tract function and anatomy, but few standards exist for reporting VCUG findings. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess variability in VCUG reports and to test our hypothesis that VCUG reports from pediatric facilities and pediatric radiologists are more complete than those performed at other facilities or by non-pediatric radiologists. STUDY DESIGN We analyzed original VCUG reports from children enrolled in the Randomized Intervention for Children with Vesicoureteral Reflux (RIVUR) trial. A 23-item checklist was created and used to evaluate reporting of technical (e.g. catheter size), anatomic (e.g. vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) presence and grade, bladder shape), and functional information (e.g. bladder emptying). Radiologists were classified as pediatric or non-pediatric radiologists. Facilities were categorized as to whether they were a free-standing pediatric hospital (FSPH), a pediatric "hospital within a hospital" (PHWH), a non-pediatric hospital (NPH), or an outpatient radiology facility (ORF). Multivariate linear regression was used to analyze factors associated with the completeness of the VCUG reports (percent of items reported from the 23-item checklist). RESULTS Six-hundred and two VCUGs were performed at 90 institutions. Of those, 76% were read by a pediatric radiologist, and 49% were performed at a FSPH (Table). On average, less than half of the 23 items in our standardized assessment tool were included in VCUG reports (mean 48%, SD 12). The completeness of reports varied by facility type: 51% complete at FSPH (SD 11), 50% at PHWH (SD 10), 36% at NPH (SD 11), and 43% at ORF (SD 8) (p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, VCUG reports generated at NPH or ORF had 8% fewer items included (95% CI 3.0-12.8, p < 0.01), and those generated at PHWH did not differ from those generated at FSPH. Reports read by a non-pediatric radiologist had 6% fewer items included (95% CI 3-9.7; p < 0.01) compared with those read by a pediatric radiologist. DISCUSSION There is substantial underreporting of findings in VCUG reports when assessing a widely represented sample of routine, community-generated reports using an idealized standard. Although VUR was often reported, other crucial anatomic and functional findings of the VCUG were consistently underreported across all facility types. CONCLUSION Although pediatric radiologist and pediatric hospitals generated more complete VCUG reports compared with those having non-pediatric origins, the differences are small when considering the substantial underreporting of VCUG findings in general. This underscores the opportunities for improvement in reporting of VCUG findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony J Schaeffer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Urology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| | - Jeanne S Chow
- Department of Urology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anastasia Ivanova
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Gang Cui
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Saul P Greenfield
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Women & Children's Hospital of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - J Michael Zerin
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Alejandro Hoberman
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ranjiv I Mathews
- Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tej K Mattoo
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Myra A Carpenter
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Marva Moxey-Mims
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Russell W Chesney
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Caleb P Nelson
- Department of Urology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee LC, Lorenzo AJ, Koyle MA. The role of voiding cystourethrography in the investigation of children with urinary tract infections. Can Urol Assoc J 2016; 10:210-214. [PMID: 27713802 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.3610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) represent a common bacterial cause of febrile illness in children. Of children presenting with a febrile UTI, 25-40% are found to have vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Historically, the concern regarding VUR was that it could lead to recurrent pyelonephritis, renal scarring, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. As a result, many children underwent invasive surgical procedures to correct VUR. We now know that many cases of VUR are low-grade and have a high rate of spontaneous resolution. The roles of surveillance, antibiotic prophylaxis, endoscopic injection, and ureteral reimplantation surgery also continue to evolve. In turn, these factors have influenced the investigation of febrile UTIs. Voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) is the radiographic test of choice to diagnose VUR. Due to its invasive nature and questionable benefit in many cases, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) no longer recommends VCUG routinely after an initial febrile UTI. Nevertheless, these guidelines pre-date the landmark Randomized Intervention of Children with Vesicoureteral Reflux (RIVUR) trial and there continues to be controversy regarding the diagnosis and management of VUR. This paper discusses the current literature regarding radiographic testing in children with febrile UTIs and presents a practical risk-based approach for deciding when to obtain a VCUG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda C Lee
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Armando J Lorenzo
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada;; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Martin A Koyle
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada;; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vesicoureteral Reflux Index: 2-Institution Analysis and Validation. J Urol 2016; 195:1294-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|