Whole spine MRI in the assessment of acute vertebral body trauma

Increased incidence of vertebral fractures in German adults from 2009 to 2019 and the analysis of secondary diagnoses, treatment, costs, and in-hospital mortality

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to present the nationwide rates of hospitalized patients with vertebral fractures over one decade and to comprehensively analyze the treatment characteristics and direct costs incurred in 2019. Therefore, the trends in the incidence rate were quantified based on annual ICD-10 diagnosis codes from all German medical facilities between 2009 and 2019, provided by the Federal Statistical Office (Destatis). The ICD-10 Codes "S12.0-2; S22.0-; S32.0-, and S32.1-2" were evaluated. The relative change from 2009 through 2019 was determined. Using data from the Institute for Hospital Remuneration Systems (InEK) for 2019 the secondary diagnoses, OPS-codes, intensive care unit (ICU) treatment, in-hospital mortality, the proportion of G-DRGs and cumulative costs were evaluated. The documented number of vertebral fractures increased by 45.6% between 2009 and 2019 to an incidence of 150.7 per 100,000 inhabitants. The lumbar spine was most commonly affected with an incidence of 70.5/100,000 inhabitants in 2019 (46.8% of all vertebral fractures). The highest increases were seen in the numbers of subaxial cervical fractures (+ 121.2%) and sacral fractures (+ 306.6%). Of all vertebral fractures in 2019, 63.7% were diagnosed in women and 69.0% in patients aged 70 years or older. Osteoporosis was documented in 17.9% of cases as a concomitant diagnosis. In 10.1% of all cases, an ICU treatment was documented. The in-hospital mortality was 2.0% in 2019. I68D was the most frequently used G-DRG code, accounting for 33.3% of cases. The total direct costs for inpatient treatment in 2019 amounted to €589,205,715. The evaluation of 955,091 vertebral fractures showed a sharp increase in the nation-wide incidence rate. The presented age and sex distribution, the comorbidity profile and the in-hospital mortality rate indicate the importance of comprehensive geriatric assessment and emphasize the need for spinal care centers to be established.

The progression of the vertebral body bruise associated with a spinal fracture

Background

Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have made it possible to find the vertebral body bruise (VBB), which was not found in computed tomography (CT) after trauma. There has been only one study with adult patients about whether traumatic VBB will cause a collapse of the vertebral body or not. The purpose is to elucidate the progression of VBB in non-osteoporotic adult patients and to identify the possible factors influencing the progression.

Method

The VBB was defined on MRI as band-like or diffuse zones of high signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences without fracture of the cortex based on CT. The study population with traumatic VBB associated with non-osteoporotic spinal fracture was composed of 15 females and 21 males. The minimal follow-up period was 6 months. The ratio of anterior to posterior heights of the VBB, the ratio of anterior heights of the VBB to the average of those of cranial and caudal adjacent vertebral bodies, the anterior wedge angle of the VBB, and the focal angle around the VBB were compared between the initial and final visits. We evaluated the age of the patients, the C2 plumb line distance, the regional location of VBB, the etiology of VBB, and the treatment methods of the fractures as possible risk factors influencing the progression.

Results

There was no difference in the ratios and angles between the initial and final visits. The differences in the ratios and angles between the initial and final visits were not dependent on the possible risk factors. The anterior superior area is the most common in the distribution of VBB.

Conclusions

Unlike compression fractures, the vertebral body with traumatic VBB found in adult patients with non-osteoporotic spinal fractures of AO classification A or B types did not develop collapse. In clinical practice, it is reasonable to diagnose it as a spinal fracture rather than a VBB if the collapse of a possible VBB occurs.

Imaging diagnosis of lumbar foraminal stenosis in the fifth lumbar nerve root: reliability and reproducibility of T1-weighted three-dimensional lumbar MRI

BACKGROUND

Various magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques have been reported in detection of lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS), especially for T2-weighted three-dimensional MRI (3D-MRI) describing the shape of nerve roots. The detection of LFS in the fifth lumbar nerve root (L5 root), however, is still less reliable compared to other lumbar nerve roots. Then we have been using T1-weighted 3D-MRI aiming to depict the shape of, and also pathology affecting the L5 root. The aim of this study is to evaluate our T1-weighted 3D-MRI in diagnosing LFS of the L5 root.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 24 patients with intracanal stenosis (ICS) at L4-5, and 30 patients with LFS at L5-S causing unilateral L5 root lesion. The pre-operative T1-weighted 3D-MRI aiming bilateral L5 nerve roots of each patient were blinded and reviewed twice by five spine surgeons, independently. The image evaluation was performed in two conditions: (I) the symptomatic side was judged in 30 patients of LFS patients, and (II) the symptomatic side or the absence of LFS was judged in images of all the 54 patients including LFS and ICS patients. The correct-answer-rate, sensitivity and specificity of the imaging study were calculated. Also, the intra- and interobserver agreement of the imaging study by five spine surgeons were evaluated by the kappa (κ) statistics.

RESULTS

For conditions (I) and (II) above, the mean correct-answer-rate was 92.3% and 69.8%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the imaging study was 72.6% and 66.3%, respectively. The average of intraobserver κ-value of five examiners was 0.874 and 0.708, and the average of interobserver κ-value was 0.837 and 0.578, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

As well as previously reported T2-weighted 3D-MRI, our T1-weighted 3D-MRI was found to be reliable in diagnosing LFS of the L5 root.

Whole-Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Review of Suggested Indications

»

The spinal column has a propensity for lesions to manifest in a multifocal manner, and identification of the lesions can be difficult.

»

When used to image the spine, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) most accurately identifies the presence and location of lesions, guiding the treatment plan and preventing potentially devastating complications that are known to be associated with unidentified lesions.

»

Certain conditions clearly warrant evaluation with whole-spine MRI, whereas the use of whole-spine MRI with other conditions is more controversial.

»

We suggest whole-spine MRI when evaluating and treating any spinal infection, lumbar stenosis with upper motor neuron signs, ankylosing disorders of the spine with concern for fracture, congenital scoliosis undergoing surgical correction, and metastatic spinal tumors.

»

Use of whole-spine MRI in patients with idiopathic scoliosis and acute spinal trauma remains controversial.

Coexisting Spine Lesions on Whole Spine T2 Sagittal MRI in Evaluating Spinal Degenerative Disease

BACKGROUND

Studies have reported on the usefulness of whole spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating specific diseases such as spinal tuberculosis, spinal trauma, spondyloarthropathies, and multiple myeloma. In studies concerning degenerative spinal disease, sample sizes were small and some did not provide information on how symptomatic coexisting lesions were treated. We evaluated the types and prevalence of coexisting spine lesions found on whole spine T2 sagittal screening performed at the time of routine cervical and lumbar spine MRI and evaluated the efficacy of such screening in degenerative diseases of the cervical and lumbar spine.

METHODS

We reviewed 1,757 and 2,266 consecutive cases where whole spine T2 sagittal screening had been performed with routine cervical and lumbar spine MRI, respectively, in patients with cervical and lumbar spinal degenerative diseases. Coexisting spine lesions were documented and statistical analysis was performed to investigate significant differences according to sex, age, and initial diagnosis. Electronic medical records were reviewed to determine whether additional interventions were necessary following such findings.

RESULTS

We reviewed 1,252 and 1,689 consecutive cases of routine cervical and lumbar spine MRI respectively, with whole spine T2 sagittal screening. Of the 1,252, 419 (33.5%) patients with cervical spinal degenerative disease had coexisting lesions in the thoracolumbar spine. Patients with ligament ossification disease of the cervical spine showed a higher prevalence of coexisting spine lesions. Sixty of the 419 (14.3%) patients with coexisting spine lesions warranted additional intervention or surgical treatment. Four hundred and eighty-one of 1,689 (28.5%) patients with lumbar degenerative disease had coexisting spine lesions in the cervicothoracic spine. Forty-eight of the 481 (10.0%) patients with coexisting spine lesions warranted additional intervention. In both patient groups, older patients showed a significantly higher prevalence of coexisting spine lesions than younger patients.

CONCLUSION

Considering the minimal extra time and cost in performing whole spine screening, its application to routine spine MRI can be considered in evaluating cervical and lumbar spinal degenerative diseases.

Investigation of Whole Spine MRI in the Emergency Department at Two Large Tertiary Care Academic Medical Centers in the United States

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The impact of emergent whole spine magnetic resonance imaging (WS-MRI) on patient management has not been extensively studied to date. Here, we explore indications, results, and outcomes associated with WS-MRI performed through the emergency departments (EDs) of 2 large tertiary care, academic medical centers in the Northeastern United States. We hypothesize that given a relatively low barrier to entry, coupled with lack of appropriateness guidelines, a sizeable proportion of WS-MRI studies performed emergently do not result in spine findings necessitating inpatient admission for immediate treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 335 adult patients (≥18 years) who underwent WS-MRI through the ED between 2016 and 2019. The demographic data collected included, age, sex, chief complaint, history of spine disease, and date and type of last spine imaging prior to ED presentation. Data compiled from the time of ED visit included WS-MRI result and patient disposition, including reason for hospital admission, by which patients were categorized into groups to allow for ease of comparisons. Hypergeometric tests were used to determine statistically significant associations between random discrete variables.

RESULTS

Trauma was the most frequent chief complaint, comprising 35% (n = 117) of all presentations, followed by pain (25%, n = 84), motor deficit (16%, n = 55), sensory disturbance (12%, n = 41), bowel, and/or bladder dysfunction (9%, n = 30), and subjective or objective fevers with suspicion for spine infection (2%, n = 8). The largest proportion of WS-MRI studies revealed degenerative disc disease (DDD) as the principal result (41%, n = 139). 52% of all patients were either discharged directly from the ED (41%) or admitted for a non-spine issue after WS-MRI (11%); of these numbers, 61% underwent WS-MRI and no other imaging study in the ED. In patients who presented with a chief complaint of pain, DDD was often the principal WS-MRI finding (54%), albeit this association was not statistically significant. DDD, nonetheless, was positively associated with a discharge from the ED (P <0.001). Trauma was positively associated with fracture or ligamentous/soft tissue injury (P <0.001) on WS-MRI and hospital admission for a spine issue (P <0.01).

CONCLUSION

That just under half of patients in our study were admitted for spine-related pathology suggests that WS-MRI is valuable in the emergent setting. At the same time, however, that over half of patients were not subsequently admitted for a spine-related issue points to the possibility of further refining which patients would benefit most from WS-MRI. WS-MRI may be less helpful in patients presenting with pain, though may be higher-yield in those with trauma, motor deficits, and bowel/bladder complaints. Although MRI is highly sensitive in ruling out emergent central nervous system pathology, given the resource-intensive nature of the test, it is prudent to carefully select which patients should undergo emergent WS-MRI, especially in instances when more cost-effective, alternative diagnostic approaches, including detailed neurological exam, computed tomography, or localized/targeted MRI, are possible.

Is focused magnetic resonance imaging adequate for treatment decision making in acute traumatic thoracic and lumbar spine fractures seen on whole spine computed tomography?

PURPOSE

To assess whether a focused magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) limited to the region of known acute traumatic thoracic or lumbar fracture(s) would miss any clinically significant injuries that would change patient management.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A multicenter retrospective clinical study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Adult patients with acute traumatic thoracic and/or lumbar spine fracture(s).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Pathology identified on MRI (ligamentous disruption, epidural hematoma, and cord contusion), outside of the focused zone, an alteration in patient management, including surgical and nonsurgical, as a result of the identified pathology outside the focused zone.

METHODS

Records were reviewed for all adult trauma patients who presented to the emergency department between 2008 and 2016 with one or more fracture(s) of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine identified on computed tomography (CT) and who underwent MRI of the entire thoracic and lumbar spine within 10 days. Exclusion criteria were patients with >4 fractured levels, pathologic fractures, isolated transverse, and/or spinous process fractures, prior vertebral augmentation, and prior thoracic or lumbar spine instrumentation. Patients with neurologic deficits or cervical spine fractures were also included. MRIs were reviewed independently by one spine surgeon and one musculoskeletal fellowship-trained emergency radiologist for posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) integrity, vertebral injury, epidural hematoma, and cord contusion. The surgeon also commented on the clinical significance of the pathology identified outside the focused zone. All cases in which pathology was identified outside of the focused zone (three levels above and below the fractures) were independently reviewed by a second spine surgeon to determine whether the pathology was clinically significant and would alter the treatment plan.

RESULTS

In total, 126 patients with 216 fractures identified on CT were included, with a median age of 49 years. There were 81 males (64%). Sixty-two (49%) patients had isolated thoracolumbar junction injuries and 36 (29%) had injuries limited to a single fractured level. Forty-seven (37%) patients were managed operatively. PLC injury was identified by both readers in 36 (29%) patients with a percent agreement of 96% and κ coefficient of 0.91 (95% CI 0.87-0.95). Both readers independently agreed that there was no pathology identified on the complete thoracic and lumbar spine MRIs outside the focused zone in 107 (85%) patients. Injury outside the focused zone was identified by at least one reader in 19 (15%) patients. None of the readers identified PLC injury, cord edema, or noncontiguous epidural hematoma outside the focused zone. Percent agreement for outside pathology between the two readers was 92% with a κ coefficient of 0.60 (95% CI 0.48-0.72). The two spine surgeons independently agreed that none of the identified pathology outside of the focused zone altered management.

CONCLUSIONS

A focused MRI protocol of three levels above and below known thoracolumbar spine fractures would have missed radiological abnormality in 15% of patients. However, the pathology, such as vertebral body edema not appreciated on CT, was not clinically significant and did not alter patient care. Based on these findings, the investigators conclude that a focused protocol would decrease the imaging time while providing the information of the injured segment with minimal risk of missing any clinically significant injuries.

Usefulness of Fat Suppression Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in Preventing Subsequent Fractures After Kyphoplasty

BACKGROUND

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging with fat suppression (FS-MRI) is useful to detect bone marrow edema in osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) and thus can improve diagnostic accuracy and influence surgical strategy for percutaneous augmentation. The role of preoperative FS-MRI in preventing subsequent fractures after balloon kyphoplasty has not been investigated in initially subclinical fractures or fractures without obvious morphologic changes.

METHODS

From January 2010 to December 2017, 214 consecutive patients underwent balloon kyphoplasty for painful OVFs. We defined 2 groups based on preoperative imaging (100 patients had preoperative FS-MRI and 114 patients had no MRI) and then compared baseline and surgical characteristics. The primary end point was incidence of subsequent fractures within 12 months after treatment.

RESULTS

The 214 patients underwent kyphoplasty of 414 vertebrae. Comparing FS-MRI with no-MRI groups, spontaneous fractures occurred significantly more (58% vs. 26.3%; P < 0.001) and fractures were more often multilevel (≥ 4 levels) (15% vs. 2.6%; P = 0.001), respectively. Overall incidence of subsequent vertebral fractures was 25.7% (32% in FS-MRI, 20.2% in no-MRI groups; P = 0.048). Average time to diagnosis of subsequent fractures did not differ between the 2 groups (9.3 FS-MRI vs. 11.5 weeks no-MRI; P = 0.411). Age ≥80 years at the time of balloon kyphoplasty was associated with a higher odds ratio (2.3) for subsequent fractures within 12 months (P = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment according to preoperative FS-MRI did not reduce occurrence of subsequent OVFs and did not prolong fracture-free intervals within 12 months after kyphoplasty.

FSE T2-weighted two-point Dixon technique for fat suppression in the lumbar spine: comparison with SPAIR technique

PURPOSE

Fat suppression magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique has been used to improve the diagnostic confidence in lumbar spine diseases. We aimed to compare T2-weighted water-fat separation technique (T2 Dixon) with spectral attenuated inversion recovery (SPAIR) image for fat suppression.

METHODS

Lumbar spine MRI examinations were performed in 79 patients by using a 3.0 T machine. We compared T2 Dixon water-only image and SPAIR image for the evaluation of fat suppression quality and lesion conspicuity. For qualitative evaluation, two radiologists scored the images from Dixon and SPAIR for fat suppression uniformity and lesion conspicuity. Quantitative assessment was also performed for 39 lesions in 26 patients who had lesions in their spine bodies. Contrast ratio (CR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated by signal intensity measurement of the lesions, adjacent bodies, and background noise. The Wilcoxon's signed-rank test and paired sample t-test were used to assess the statistical significance of qualitative and quantitative data, respectively.

RESULTS

For qualitative assessment, T2 Dixon water-only image showed higher mean scores for fat suppression quality and lesion conspicuity than SPAIR (2.99±0.11 vs. 2.18±0.38 and 2.84±0.37 vs. 2.28±0.51, respectively). For quantitative measurement, the CR and CNR values of the lesions were higher on T2 Dixon than on SPAIR. Both qualitative and quantitative results showed statistically significant differences between T2 Dixon and SPAIR (P < 0.01 in all).

CONCLUSION

T2 Dixon sequence was superior to SPAIR for the quality of fat suppression and for the delineation of lumbar spine lesions.

Controversies in the Management of Geriatric Odontoid Fractures

Fractures of the odontoid process of C2 have become increasingly prevalent in the aging population and are typically associated with a high incidence of morbidity. Dens fractures comprise the majority of all cervical fractures in patients older than 80 years and remain the most common cervical fracture pattern in all geriatric patients. Type II odontoid fractures have been associated with limited healing potential, and both nonoperative and operative management are associated with high mortality rates. Historically, there has been some debate in the literature with regards to optimal management strategies to maximize outcomes in geriatric patients. Recent, high-quality evidence has indicated that surgical treatment of type II odontoid fractures in elderly patients is associated with improvements in both short- and long-term mortality. Additionally, surgical intervention has been shown to improve functional outcomes when compared with nonsurgical treatment. Factors to consider before surgery for geriatric type II odontoid fractures include associated comorbidities and the safety of general anesthesia administration. With appropriate measures of patient selection, surgery can provide an efficacious option for geriatric patients with type II odontoid fractures. We recommend surgical intervention via a posterior C1-C2 arthrodesis for geriatric type II odontoid fractures, provided that the surgery itself does not represent an unreasonable risk for mortality.

Registration of MRI to intraoperative radiographs for target localization in spinal interventions

Decision support to assist in target vertebra localization could provide a useful aid to safe and effective spine surgery. Previous solutions have shown 3D-2D registration of preoperative CT to intraoperative radiographs to reliably annotate vertebral labels for assistance during level localization. We present an algorithm (referred to as MR-LevelCheck) to perform 3D-2D registration based on a preoperative MRI to accommodate the increasingly common clinical scenario in which MRI is used instead of CT for preoperative planning. Straightforward adaptation of gradient/intensity-based methods appropriate to CT-to-radiograph registration is confounded by large mismatch and noncorrespondence in image intensity between MRI and radiographs. The proposed method overcomes such challenges with a simple vertebrae segmentation step using vertebra centroids as seed points (automatically defined within existing workflow). Forwards projections are computed using segmented MRI and registered to radiographs via gradient orientation (GO) similarity and the CMA-ES (covariance-matrix-adaptation evolutionary-strategy) optimizer. The method was tested in an IRB-approved study involving 10 patients undergoing cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine surgery following preoperative MRI. The method successfully registered each preoperative MRI to intraoperative radiographs and maintained desirable properties of robustness against image content mismatch and large capture range. Robust registration performance was achieved with projection distance error (PDE) (median  ±  IQR)  =  4.3  ±  2.6 mm (median  ±  IQR) and 0% failure rate. Segmentation accuracy for the continuous max-flow method yielded dice coefficient  =  88.1  ±  5.2, accuracy  =  90.6  ±  5.7, RMSE  =  1.8  ±  0.6 mm, and contour affinity ratio (CAR)  =  0.82  ±  0.08. Registration performance was found to be robust for segmentation methods exhibiting RMSE  <3 mm and CAR  >0.50. The MR-LevelCheck method provides a potentially valuable extension to a previously developed decision support tool for spine surgery target localization by extending its utility to preoperative MRI while maintaining characteristics of accuracy and robustness.

Multilevel non-contiguous spinal injuries: incidence and patterns based on whole spine MRI

PURPOSE

Multi-level non-contiguous spinal injuries are not uncommon and their incidence varies from 1.6 to 77% depending on the type of imaging modality used. Delayed diagnosis and missed spinal injuries in non-contiguous spine fractures have been frequently described which can result in significant pain, deformity and neurological deficit. The efficacy of whole spine MRI in detecting asymptomatic significant vertebral fractures is not known.

METHODOLOGY

Consecutive spinal injury patients treated between 2011 and 2013 were retrospectively evaluated based on clinical and radiographic records. Patients' demographics, mode of injury, presence of associated injuries, clinical symptoms and the presence of neurological deficit were studied. Radiographs of the fractured region and whole spine MRI were evaluated for the presence of multi-level injuries.

RESULTS

Among 484 patients, 95 (19.62%) patients had multilevel injuries including 86 (17.76%) with non-contiguous injuries. Five common patterns of non-contiguous spinal injuries were observed. Pattern I: cervical and thoracic--29.1%, Pattern II: thoracolumbar and lumbosacral--22.1%, Pattern III: thoracic and thoracolumbar--12.8 %, Pattern IV: cervical and thoracolumbar--9.1% and Pattern V: lumbosacral and associated injuries--9.0 %. The incidence of intra-regional non-contiguous injuries was 17.4%. Whole spine MRI scan detected 24 (28.6%) missed secondary injuries of which 5 were unstable.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of multilevel non-contiguous spine injury using whole spine MRI imaging is 17.76%. Five different patterns of multi-level non-contiguous injuries were found with the most common pattern being the cervical and thoracic level injuries. The incidence of unstable injuries can be as high as 21% of missed secondary injuries.

Marrow edema variability in acute spine fractures

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The presence or absence of marrow edema is used in the assessment of fracture acuity in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We have observed variability in the degree of marrow edema in acute trauma. Our aim was to characterize the utility of marrow edema in fracture detection and fracture acuity on MRI. We hypothesized that only vertebral body compression injuries reliably generate marrow edema and that distraction injuries or fractures without compression do not reliably generate marrow edema and may give a false negative MRI examination.

PURPOSE

To characterize the utility of marrow edema in fracture detection and fracture acuity on MRI.

STUDY DESIGN

Two-year single-center retrospective review of marrow edema in patients evaluated by both computed tomography (CT) and MRI in acute trauma setting.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The final study cohort consisted of 163 patients (mean age, 54.5 years; standard deviation, 23.5 years; range, 8-94 years; 85 men and 78 women).

OUTCOME MEASURES

A physiologic measure of marrow edema as assessed by T2-signal hyperintensity on short tau inversion recovery sequence MRI examination.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective review of 1,215 patients who were evaluated at our hospital for suspected spine trauma with a combination of CT and MRI. Patients were assessed for fracture presence, location, type, and absence or degree of marrow edema.

RESULTS

The investigation identified 189/1,215 patients who had acute fractures on CT, subsequently imaged within 48 hours by MRI. A total of 94/288 acute fractures did not generate marrow edema. There were 63 patients (83 acute fractures) whose mechanism of injury resulted exclusively in acute fractures with no marrow edema. A statistically significant difference in marrow edema was observed with acute vertebral body compression fractures compared with acute fractures with distraction or fractures without compression. Moreover, certain fracture types were identified that often generate little or no marrow edema in acute trauma setting.

CONCLUSIONS

There is variability in the presence or degree of marrow edema on MRI evaluation after traumatic injury. Only fractures derived from vertebral body compression reliably generate marrow edema. Fractures without compression and/or fractures with distraction do not reliably generate marrow edema and can lead to a false negative MRI. An awareness of fracture types that produce more or less marrow edema can be beneficial when evaluating fractures by MRI.

Evaluation of lumber nerve root compression using thin-slice thickness coronal magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional fat-suppressed multi-shot balanced non-steady-state free precession versus three-dimensional T1-weighted spoiled gradient-recalled echo

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the three-dimensional fat-suppressed balanced non-steady-state free precession (3D FS-nSSFP) sequence and the 3D T1-weighted spoiled gradient-recalled echo (3D T1-GRE) sequence for evaluating lumbar nerve root compression with continuous thin-slice coronal magnetic resonance (MR) images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board approved this study, and written informed consent was obtained from all 35 patients. We optimized continuous 2.5-mm thick lumbar coronal images with 3D FS-nSSFP and 3D T1-GRE. We calculated the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for nerve roots and other structures on images with the two sequences. With knowledge of the final diagnosis, we assessed the visibility of nerve root compression on these images.

RESULTS

The CNR values of nerve roots were significantly higher on images with 3D FS-nSSFP than on those with 3D T1-GRE. These continuous thin-slice coronal images facilitated visualization of nerve root compression in >91% of patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the two sequences in the detection of nerve root compression.

CONCLUSION

Continuous thin-slice coronal MR images using 3D FS-nSSFP and 3D T1-GRE sequences are sufficient to evaluate lumbar nerve root compression, and 3D FS-nSSFP is superior to 3D T1-GRE for depiction of lumbar nerve roots.

[Imaging of acute spinal injury]

The mechanism location and type of injury varies according to patient age and severity of trauma. The imaging work-up with radiographs, CT and MRI must be adapted to each individual case. In the setting of minor trauma, standard radiographs are obtained when clinically indicated. In all other cases of high energy trauma, spinal trauma with neurological deficit or incomplete or difficult standard radiographic evaluation, CT will be indicated for osseous injuries while MRI will provide optimal evaluation of soft tissues. Dislocations require immediate treatment. The imaging work-up should by no means delay management. Significant sprains are rare. Several diagnostic pitfalls occur at both extremities of life.

Odontoid fractures: update on management

Recognition of the incidence of odontoid fractures as well as the associated morbidity and unexpectedly high mortality rates has prompted significant changes in the management of these fractures in the past decade. Nonsurgical management of type II odontoid fracture has historically been associated with a high nonunion rate. Thus, new classification systems have been devised to identify patients who might benefit from early surgical treatment. The decision-making process is particularly difficult when treating elderly patients. Increased familiarity with anterior and posterior surgical techniques has led to more aggressive treatment of odontoid fracture, with the intent of hastening functional rehabilitation. However, these clinical decisions have been associated with a significant rate of complications. The treatment algorithm for odontoid fractures continues to evolve based on the improved understanding of, and evidence-based literature on, anterior screw fixation, posterior spinal fusion, and halo-vest immobilization.

Types and prevalence of coexisting spine lesions on whole spine sagittal MR images in surgical degenerative spinal diseases

PURPOSE

We investigated types and prevalence of coexisting lesions found on whole spine sagittal T2-weighted images (WSST2I) acquired from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and evaluated their clinical significance in surgical degenerative spinal diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Coexisting spinal lesions were investigated using WSST2I from 306 consecutive patients with surgical degenerative spinal diseases. Severity of coexisting lesions was classified into four grades (0-3). Lesions of grade 2 and 3 were defined as "meaningful coexisting spine lesions" (MCSL). Degenerative spinal diseases were classified into three pathologies: simple disc herniation, degenerative spinal stenosis, and ligament ossification disease. The relationships between MCSL, gender, age, and primary spine lesions were analyzed.

RESULTS

MCSL were found in 95 patients: a prevalence of 31.1%. Five out of 95 MCSL were surgically managed. The most common types of MCSL were disc herniation with 13.1% prevalence, followed by degenerative stenosis (9.5%) and ligament ossification diseases (6.8%). Older patients (age >or= 40) showed a significantly higher prevalence of MCSL than younger patients. There was no significant difference between male and female patients. The prevalence of MCSL was significantly higher (52.4%) in ligament ossification diseases than in disc herniation or spinal stenosis.

CONCLUSION

Degenerative spinal diseases showed a high prevalence of MCSL, especially in old ages and ligament ossification diseases. WSST2I is useful for diagnosing coexisting spinal diseases and to avoid missing a significant cord-compressing lesion.

[New advances on diagnostic imaging in spinal pathology]

In the past years, there has been a remarkable improvement on imaging technology. Magnetic resonance (MR) is the method of choice for detection, diagnosis and therapeutic management for many disorders of the spine. A variety of innovative new MR methods have been developed. These new techniques include molecular diffusion sequences, MR myelography, a complete study of the entire spine, kinematic MR imaging of the spine, whole body MR exam and the fusion of different imaging modalities. These new technological developments have the potential to profoundly impact and modify imaging interpretation to offer a more efficient diagnostic and work-up of patients suffering from spinal disease.

[Whole body MRI--diagnostic strategy of the future?]

Whole body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) opens new opportunities in diagnostic radiology as systemic disease entities can be examined with high sensitivity. This can lead to a change of paradigm, so that not only organ-related but rather disease-specific MRI examination protocols can be applied which focus on the underlying pathophysiology of the disease. Whole body MRI has already been successfully used for several oncological and non-oncological indications. In addition, whole body MRI has broadened the discussion regarding its use for secondary prevention. Compared to computed tomography, MRI does not use radiation. Although whole body MRI is still in an early stage, the enormous medical and economical potential can be envisioned.

[Evidence based diagnostic procedures for the determination of suspected blunt cervical spine injuries. Development of an algorithm]

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to present existing publications, describing various diagnostic procedures as well as considering the evidence supporting them, to develop a recommendation for diagnosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed relevant publications between 1966 and 2004 by a systemic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Cochrane Library as well as a manual reference search. Keywords were cervical spine, cervical vertebrae, spinal, spinal cord, injury, trauma, fracture, dislocation, imaging, radiography, flexion, extension, fluoroscopy, computed tomography, computed scanning, and magnetic resonance imaging. The selected search results were then classified into levels of evidence.

RESULTS

From among a total of 10,000 publications, 137 relevant publications were stringently reviewed. The level of evidence is on the whole limited due to deficit data; therefore, only class II-III recommendations are possible. We developed an algorithm for the diagnostic approach to suspected trauma of the cervical spine. This clinical algorithm displays the complex diagnosis of cervical spine injury in a clear and logically structured process.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic algorithm for cervical spine injury meets the presently required standards and maximizes care for the newly injured. The development, which can be followed using evidence-based medicine, is transparent and therefore aids the decision process when choosing an adequate diagnostic procedure.

Fractures and Dislocations of the Cervicothoracic Junction

Presented is a retrospective review of case notes and all available imaging studies in seven patients with acute fractures-dislocations of the cervicothoracic junction. Imaging studies included radiographs (five cases), computed tomography (six cases), and magnetic resonance imaging (seven cases). The study group consisted of five men and two women with mean age at presentation of 43.6 years (range 25-69 years). Four patients had been in road traffic accidents, whereas three patients had had falls. Three patients sustained complete neurologic deficits with no recovery, whereas the remaining four had no abnormal neurology or mild deficit at presentation and were normal at final follow-up. The injury was missed initially in three cases. The commonest injury pattern was traumatic spondylolisthesis of C7 on T1 with multilevel neural arch fractures, resulting in increased anteroposterior canal dimensions (four cases). Bilateral pars fractures of C7 and pure facet dislocation were seen in one case each. Neurologic deficit was related to the degree of anterior displacement of C7 on T1. Fracture-dislocation at the cervicothoracic junction is a rare injury with a variation of injury patterns and neurologic outcome.

Radiographic outcome of vertebral bone bruise associated with fracture of the thoracic and lumbar spine in adults

Bone bruising associated with long bone injury is a defined entity with known radiological, pathologic and clinical features. Vertebral bone bruise (VBB) has been described through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the injured spine, but to date the consequences of this entity are unknown. The objective of this retrospective study was to describe the plain radiographic outcome of MRI-defined VBB associated with thoracic and lumbar spine fracture in adults, and to assess whether VBBs caused abnormalities of the bone-implant interface at instrumented levels. Levels of VBB were identified through analysis of the full spine MRI in a consecutive series of adult patients admitted to a spinal injuries unit for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. The anterior wedge angles (AWAs) of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae demonstrating VBB were measured on radiographs taken at time of injury and at follow-up. Abnormalities of the bone--implant interface were recorded at instrumented levels associated with VBB on follow-up radiographs. Thirty VBBs were identified in 18 adult patients who had suffered 21 vertebral fractures. At an average follow-up of 19 months (range, 12--30 months), the mean AWAs of the VBB vertebrae at the time of injury and at the most recent follow-up were 3.5 degrees and 3.8 degrees , respectively (p=0.33, paired t-test). A total of 12 out of 30 (40%) bruised levels were instrumented in 13 out of 18 (72%) operated patients. No bone--implant interface failure was observed at these levels. It is concluded that VBB associated with thoracic and lumbar vertebral fracture in adult patients does not appear to cause significant progressive vertebral deformity or bone--implant interface failure.

[Possibilities of whole-body MRI for investigating musculoskeletal diseases]

This contribution outlines possibilities and limitations of whole-body MRI for investigating musculoskeletal diseases. Benefits and drawbacks of the novel whole-body MRI technology are discussed and a possible whole-body MRI sequence protocol for musculoskeletal examinations is proposed. Muscle, joint and bone diseases are discussed in which the application of whole-body MRI may be of advantage. Particularly, polymyositis, muscledystrophy, rheumatoid arthritis, spondylitis ancylosans, multiple trauma, skeletal metastases, multiple myeloma and malignant lymphoma are mentioned. Whole-body MRI opens new advantages for the examination of multifocal musculoskeletal diseases. The clinical benefit of this method for particular diseases has to be evaluated in further studies, however.