Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating osteomyelitis from acute neuropathic arthropathy in the complicated diabetic foot

Diagnosing osteomyelitis in diabetic foot by diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE), for diagnosing osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A thorough search was carried out to identify suitable studies published up to September 2023. The quality of the studies involved was evaluated using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of each imaging modality/method for each specific cut point were summarized. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was calculated using bivariate mixed effects models.

RESULTS

Five studies investigating 187 patients and 234 bone lesions with 110 diagnosed osteomyelitis were enrolled. Four studies used DWI (172 lesions), three studies used DCE techniques (140 lesions) and two studies presented results of conventional MRI (66 lesions). The sensitivity ranges using conventional MRI, DWI and DCE were 65%-100%, 65%-100% and 64%-100%, respectively. The specificity ranges were 50%-61%, 56%-95%, and 66%-93%, respectively. The SROC curve of DWI and DCE was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.92) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Combining DWI and DCE methods, alongside conventional MRI, can improve the reliability and accuracy of diabetic foot osteomyelitis diagnosis. However, the study recognizes result variability due to varying protocols and emphasizes the need for well-designed studies with standardized approaches. To optimize diagnostic performance, the study recommends considering low ADC values, Ktrans or rapid wash-in rate from DCE such as iAUC60, along with using large ROIs that cover the entire lesion while excluding normal bone marrow.

How to do and evaluate DWI and DCE-MRI sequences for diabetic foot assessment

MRI evaluation of the diabetic foot is still a challenge not only from an interpretative but also from a technical point of view. The incorporation of advanced sequences such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI into standard protocols for diabetic foot assessment could aid radiologists in differentiating between neuropathic osteoarthropathy (Charcot's foot) and osteomyelitis. This distinction is crucial as both conditions can coexist in diabetic patients, and they require markedly different clinical management and have distinct prognoses. Over the past decade, several studies have explored the effectiveness of DWI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in distinguishing between septic and reactive bone marrow, as well as soft tissue involvement in diabetic patients, yielding promising results. DWI, without the need for exogenous contrast, can provide insights into the cellularity of bone marrow and soft tissues. DCE-MRI allows for a more precise evaluation of soft tissue and bone marrow perfusion compared to conventional post-gadolinium imaging. The data obtained from these sequences will complement the traditional MRI approach in assessing the diabetic foot. The objective of this review is to familiarize readers with the fundamental concepts of DWI and DCE-MRI, including technical adjustments and practical tips for image interpretation in diabetic foot cases.

Perfusion Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System

Perfusion imaging is the aspect of functional imaging, which is most applicable to the musculoskeletal system. In this review, the anatomy and physiology of bone perfusion is briefly outlined as are the methods of acquiring perfusion data on MR imaging. The current clinical indications of perfusion related to the assessment of soft tissue and bone tumors, synovitis, osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, Keinbock's disease, diabetic foot, osteochondritis dissecans, and Paget's disease of bone are reviewed. Challenges and opportunities related to perfusion imaging of the musculoskeletal system are also briefly addressed.

Imaging of the Diabetic Foot

Diabetic foot complications are increasingly prevalent in the world, leading to significant morbidity and driving up associated health care costs. Complex pathophysiology and suboptimal specificity of current imaging modalities have made diagnosis challenging, mainly in the evaluation of superimposed foot infection to underlying arthropathy or other marrow lesions. Recent advances in radiology and nuclear medicine have the potential to streamline the assessment of diabetic foot complications. But we must be aware of the specific strengths and weaknesses of each modality, and their applications. This review offers a comprehensive approach to the spectrum of diabetic foot complications and their imaging appearances in conventional and advanced imaging studies, including optimal technical considerations for each technique. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques are highlighted, illustrating their complementary role to conventional MRI, in particular their potential impact in avoiding additional studies.

Bone Marrow Changes and Lesions of Diabetic Foot and Ankle Disease: Conventional and Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Diabetic foot and ankle complications contribute to substantial mortality and morbidity. Early detection and treatment can lead to better patient outcomes. The primary diagnostic challenge for radiologists is distinguishing Charcot's neuroarthropathy from osteomyelitis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred imaging modality for assessing diabetic bone marrow alterations and for identifying diabetic foot complications. Several recent technical advances in MRI, such as the Dixon technique, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, have led to improved image quality and increased capability to add more functional and quantitative information.We discuss the bone marrow abnormalities encountered in daily radiologic assessment: osteopenia, reactive bone marrow edema-like signal, insufficiency fractures, Charcot's neuroarthropathy, osteomyelitis, serous marrow atrophy, digital ischemia, and bone infarcts, along with their pathophysiology and the conventional and advanced imaging techniques used for a comprehensive marrow evaluation.

Advances in Bone Marrow Imaging: Strengths and Limitations from a Clinical Perspective

Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the modality of choice to image bone marrow. However, the last few decades have witnessed the emergence and development of novel MRI techniques, such as chemical shift imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and whole-body MRI, as well as spectral computed tomography and nuclear medicine techniques. We summarize the technical bases behind these methods, in relation to the common physiologic and pathologic processes involving the bone marrow. We present the strengths and limitations of these imaging methods and consider their added value compared with conventional imaging in assessing non-neoplastic disorders like septic, rheumatologic, traumatic, and metabolic conditions. The potential usefulness of these methods to differentiate between benign and malignant bone marrow lesions is discussed. Finally, we consider the limitations hampering a more widespread use of these techniques in clinical practice.

Pathogen-specific molecular imaging and molecular testing methods in the prognosis of the complicated course of diabetic foot syndrome, the risk of amputation, and patient survival

The aim of this review was to provide extended information on current trends in the diagnosis of complicated diabetic foot syndrome (DFS), the most frequent and severe complication of diabetes mellitus, including hightech medical imaging methods and instrumental and laboratory predictors of the complicated course and risk of amputation in DFS.

The article provides an analytical review of modern publications over the past 5 years on diagnosis and therapy. Pilot data on the use of high-tech medical imaging methods, assessment of skin microbiota and ulcers in DFS, molecular testing methods in terms of predicting the amputation risk and survival of patients with DFS, as well as the effectiveness of biosensing systems have been systematized, summarized, and subjected to analytical evaluation.

The review provides an expert assessment of the capabilities of pathogen-specific molecular imaging using modern positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and highenergy radionuclides in bacterial infection to understand its pathogenesis, minimize diagnostic problems, improve antimicrobial treatment, and address fundamental and applied aspects of DFS. Literature data on the assessment of foot perfusion in diabetic patients with varying degrees of limb ischemia by hybrid technologies (SPECT / CT and PET / CT) and new modalities of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are also systematized, which contributes to new understanding of the response to revascularization, surgical shunting, and stimulation of angiogenesis within ischemic tissue, as well as potentially to healing of foot ulcers.

The review is aimed at substantiating a multidisciplinary approach in DFS, selection, development, and implementation of innovative strategies for diagnostic modalities to identify diabetic foot pathologies, and choice of an adequate method for treating and monitoring the results of therapy in the context of personalized medicine.

Pathophysiology and Molecular Imaging of Diabetic Foot Infections

Diabetic foot infection is the leading cause of non-traumatic lower limb amputations worldwide. In addition, diabetes mellitus and sequela of the disease are increasing in prevalence. In 2017, 9.4% of Americans were diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM). The growing pervasiveness and financial implications of diabetic foot infection (DFI) indicate an acute need for improved clinical assessment and treatment. Complex pathophysiology and suboptimal specificity of current non-invasive imaging modalities have made diagnosis and treatment response challenging. Current anatomical and molecular clinical imaging strategies have mainly targeted the host's immune responses rather than the unique metabolism of the invading microorganism. Advances in imaging have the potential to reduce the impact of these problems and improve the assessment of DFI, particularly in distinguishing infection of soft tissue alone from osteomyelitis (OM). This review presents a summary of the known pathophysiology of DFI, the molecular basis of current and emerging diagnostic imaging techniques, and the mechanistic links of these imaging techniques to the pathophysiology of diabetic foot infections.

Pathophysiology and Molecular Imaging of Diabetic Foot Infections

Diabetic foot infection is the leading cause of non-traumatic lower limb amputations worldwide. In addition, diabetes mellitus and sequela of the disease are increasing in prevalence. In 2017, 9.4% of Americans were diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM). The growing pervasiveness and financial implications of diabetic foot infection (DFI) indicate an acute need for improved clinical assessment and treatment. Complex pathophysiology and suboptimal specificity of current non-invasive imaging modalities have made diagnosis and treatment response challenging. Current anatomical and molecular clinical imaging strategies have mainly targeted the host's immune responses rather than the unique metabolism of the invading microorganism. Advances in imaging have the potential to reduce the impact of these problems and improve the assessment of DFI, particularly in distinguishing infection of soft tissue alone from osteomyelitis (OM). This review presents a summary of the known pathophysiology of DFI, the molecular basis of current and emerging diagnostic imaging techniques, and the mechanistic links of these imaging techniques to the pathophysiology of diabetic foot infections.

The Value of Quantitative Musculoskeletal Imaging

Musculoskeletal imaging is mainly based on the subjective and qualitative analysis of imaging examinations. However, integration of quantitative assessment of imaging data could increase the value of imaging in both research and clinical practice. Some imaging modalities, such as perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion MRI, or T2 mapping, are intrinsically quantitative. But conventional morphological imaging can also be analyzed through the quantification of various parameters. The quantitative data retrieved from imaging examinations can serve as biomarkers and be used to support diagnosis, determine patient prognosis, or monitor therapy.

We focus on the value, or clinical utility, of quantitative imaging in the musculoskeletal field. There is currently a trend to move from volume- to value-based payments. This review contains definitions and examines the role that quantitative imaging may play in the implementation of value-based health care. The influence of artificial intelligence on the value of quantitative musculoskeletal imaging is also discussed.

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with 18F-FDG PET/CT to differentiate osteomyelitis from Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy in diabetic foot

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) involving two region of interest (ROI) sizes with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) to differentiate diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) from Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy (CN).

METHOD

Thirty-one diabetic patients were included in this prospective study. Two readers independently evaluated DWI (apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] and high-b-value signal pathological-to-normal bone ratio [DWIr]) and DCE-MRI parameters (K^trans, K_ep, V_e, internal area under the gadolinium curve at 60 s [iAUC₆₀] and time intensity curve [TIC]) using two different ROI sizes, and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT parameters (visual assessment, SUV_max, delayed SUV_max, and percentage changes between SUV_max and delayed SUV_max). Techniques were compared by univariate analysis using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]. Reliability was analyzed with Kappa and Intraclass correlation [ICC].

RESULTS

DWIr, K^trans and iAUC₆₀ showed better diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.814-0.830) and reliability (ICC > 0.9) for large than for small ROIs (AUC = 0.736-0.750; ICC = 0.6 in K^trans, 0.8 in DWIr and iAUC₆₀). TIC showed moderate diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.739-0.761) and reliability (κ 0.7). Visual assessment of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated a significantly higher accuracy (AUC = 0.924) than MRI parameters. Semi-quantitative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT parameters did not provide significant improvement over visual analysis (AUC = 0.848-0.903).

CONCLUSION

DWIr, K^trans and iAUC₆₀ allowed reliable differentiation of DFO and CN, particularly for large ROIs. Visual assessment of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was the most accurate technique for differentiation.

Perspective on optical imaging for functional assessment in musculoskeletal extremity trauma surgery

SIGNIFICANCE

Extremity injury represents the leading cause of trauma hospitalizations among adults under the age of 65 years, and long-term impairments are often substantial. Restoring function depends, in large part, on bone and soft tissue healing. Thus, decisions around treatment strategy are based on assessment of the healing potential of injured bone and/or soft tissue. However, at the present, this assessment is based on subjective clinical clues and/or cadaveric studies without any objective measure. Optical imaging is an ideal method to solve several of these issues.

AIM

The aim is to highlight the current challenges in assessing bone and tissue perfusion/viability and the potentially high impact applications for optical imaging in orthopaedic surgery.

APPROACH

The prospective will review the current challenges faced by the orthopaedic surgeon and briefly discuss optical imaging tools that have been published. With this in mind, it will suggest key research areas that could be evolved to help make surgical assessments more objective and quantitative.

RESULTS

Orthopaedic surgical procedures should benefit from incorporation of methods to measure functional blood perfusion or tissue metabolism. The types of measurements though can vary in the depth of tissue sampled, with some being quite superficial and others sensing several millimeters into the tissue. Most of these intrasurgical imaging tools represent an ideal way to improve surgical treatment of orthopaedic injuries due to their inherent point-of-care use and their compatibility with real-time management.

CONCLUSION

While there are several optical measurements to directly measure bone function, the choice of tools can determine also the signal strength and depth of sampling. For orthopaedic surgery, real-time data regarding bone and tissue perfusion should lead to more effective patient-specific management of common orthopaedic conditions, requiring deeper penetrance commonly seen with indocyanine green imaging. This will lower morbidity and result in decreased variability associated with how these conditions are managed.