Fully automated deep learning for knee alignment assessment in lower extremity radiographs: a cross-sectional diagnostic study

Are artificial intelligence generated lower extremity radiographic measurements accurate in a cohort with implants?

OBJECTIVE

Leg length discrepancy (LLD) and malalignment of the lower extremity can lead to pain and increased risk of osteoarthritis. Radiographic measurements on anteroposterior (AP) full-length radiographs can be used to assess LLD and lower extremity alignment. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of AI software in performing lower extremity radiographic measurements in patients with implants. The secondary aim was to compare its efficiency to that of radiologists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study used the following eight angles and five lengths: hip-knee-angle (HKA), anatomical-tibiofemoral angle (aTFA), anatomical-mechanical-axis angle (AMA), joint-line-convergence angle (JLCA), mechanical-lateral-proximal-femur-angle (mLPFA), mechanical-lateral-distal-femur-angle (mLDFA), mechanical-medial-proximal-tibia-angle (mMPTA), mechanical-lateral-distal-tibia- angle (mLDTA), femur length, tibia length, full leg length, leg-length-discrepancy (LLD), and mechanical-axis-deviation (MAD). Two radiologists and AI software independently performed these measurements on 156 legs. The statistical methods used to assess AI performance were intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

The AI generated output for 129/156 legs. 11/13 of the variables showed excellent agreement (ICC ≥ 0.75) between AI and the readers. Bland Altman performance targets were met for 5/13 variables. The mean (standard deviation) reading time for the AI and two readers, respectively, was 38 (6) seconds, 181 (41) seconds, and 214 (77) seconds.

CONCLUSION

In a cohort with lower extremity metal implants, AI-based leg length measurements were fast and accurate although most angular measurements were not.

Use of Artificial Intelligence on Imaging and Preoperatory Planning of the Knee Joint: A Scoping Review

Background and Objectives: This scoping review explores the current state of the art of AI-based applications in the field of orthopedics, focusing on its implementation in diagnostic imaging and preoperative planning of knee joint procedures. Materials and Methods: The search was carried out using the recognized scholarly databases PubMed, Medline and Embase and was set to identify original research addressing AI applied to imaging in knee diagnosis and surgical planning, written in English and published up to January 2025. Results: The search produced 1612 papers, of which 36 were included in our review. All papers addressed AI applied to common imaging methods in clinical practice. Of these, thirty integrated AI-based tools with X-rays, one applied AI to X-rays to produce CT-like 3D reproductions, and two studies applied AI to MRI. Conclusions: Several AI tools have already been validated for enhancing the accuracy of measurements and detecting additional parameters in a shorter time compared to standard assessments. We expect these may soon be introduced into routine clinical practice to streamline a number of technical tasks and in some cases to replace the need for human intervention.

Frontal plane mechanical leg alignment estimation from knee x-rays using deep learning

Objective

Lower limb malalignment can complicate symptoms and accelerate knee osteoarthritis (OA), necessitating consideration in study population selection. In this study, we develop and validate a deep learning model that classifies leg alignment as "normal" or "malaligned" from knee antero-posterior (AP)/postero-anterior (PA) radiographs alone, using an adjustable hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle threshold.

Material and methods

We utilized 8878 digital radiographs, including 6181 AP/PA full-leg x-rays (LLRs) and 2697 AP/PA knee x-rays (2292 with positioning frame, 405 without). The model's evaluation involved two steps: In step 1, the model's predictions on knee images cropped from LLRs were compared against the ground truth from the original LLRs. In step 2, the model was tested on knee AP radiographs, using corresponding same-day LLRs as a proxy for ground truth.

Results

The model effectively classified alignment, with step one achieving sensitivity and specificity of 0.92 for a threshold of 7.5°, and 0.90 and 0.85 for 5°. For positioning frame images, step two showed a sensitivity of 0.85 and specificity of 0.81 for 7.5°, and 0.79 and 0.74 for 5°. For non-positioning frame images, sensitivity and specificity were 0.91 and 0.83 for 7.5°, and 0.9 and 0.86 for 5°.

Conclusion

The model developed in this study accurately classifies lower limb malalignment from AP/PA knee radiographs using adjustable thresholds, offering a practical alternative to LLRs. This can enhance the precision of study population selection and patient management.

Automated weight-bearing foot measurements using an artificial intelligence-based software

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI) software (BoneMetrics, Gleamer) in performing automated measurements on weight-bearing forefoot and lateral foot radiographs.

METHODS

Consecutive forefoot and lateral foot radiographs were retrospectively collected from three imaging institutions. Two senior musculoskeletal radiologists independently annotated key points to measure the hallux valgus, first-second metatarsal, and first-fifth metatarsal angles on forefoot radiographs and the talus-first metatarsal, medial arch, and calcaneus inclination angles on lateral foot radiographs. The ground truth was defined as the mean of their measurements. Statistical analysis included mean absolute error (MAE), bias assessed with Bland-Altman analysis between the ground truth and AI prediction, and intraclass coefficient (ICC) between the manual ratings.

RESULTS

Eighty forefoot radiographs were included (53 ± 17 years, 50 women), and 26 were excluded. Ninety-seven lateral foot radiographs were included (51 ± 20 years, 46 women), and 21 were excluded. MAE for the hallux valgus, first-second metatarsal, and first-fifth metatarsal angles on forefoot radiographs were respectively 1.2° (95% CI [1; 1.4], bias =  - 0.04°, ICC = 0.98), 0.7° (95% CI [0.6; 0.9], bias =  - 0.19°, ICC = 0.91) and 0.9° (95% CI [0.7; 1.1], bias = 0.44°, ICC = 0.96). MAE for the talus-first, medial arch, and calcaneal inclination angles on the lateral foot radiographs were respectively 3.9° (95% CI [3.4; 4.5], bias = 0.61° ICC = 0.88), 1.5° (95% CI [1.2; 1.8], bias =  - 0.18°, ICC = 0.95) and 1° (95% CI [0.8; 1.2], bias = 0.74°, ICC = 0.99). Bias and MAE between the ground truth and the AI prediction were low across all measurements. ICC between the two manual ratings was excellent, except for the talus-first metatarsal angle.

CONCLUSION

AI demonstrated potential for accurate and automated measurements on weight-bearing forefoot and lateral foot radiographs.

Novel dilation-erosion labeling technique allows for rapid, accurate and adjustable alignment measurements in primary TKA

BACKGROUND

Optimal implant position and alignment remains a controversial, yet critical topic in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Future study of ideal implant position will require the ability to efficiently measure component positions at scale. Previous algorithms have limited accuracy, do not allow for human oversight and correction in deployment, and require extensive training time and dataset. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop and validate a machine learning model that can accurately automate, with surgeon directed adjustment, implant position annotation.

METHODS

A retrospective series of 295 primary TKAs was identified. The femoral-tibial angle (FTA), distal femoral angle (dFA), and proximal tibial angle (pTA) were manually annotated from the immediate short leg post-op radiograph. We then trained a neural network to predict each annotated landmark using a novel label augmentation procedure of dilation, reweighting, and scheduled erosion steps. The model was compared against diverse models and accuracy was assessed using a validation set of 43 patients and test set of 79 patients.

RESULTS

Our proposed model significantly improves accuracy compared to baseline training models across all measures in ten out of eleven cases (p < 1e-22 for each measure). The mean absolute error (difference from manual annotation) was 0.65° for FTA, 1.62° for dFA, and 1.44° for pTA.

CONCLUSION

Utilizing a novel algorithm, trained on a limited dataset, the accuracy of component position was approximately 1.2°. Additionally, the model outputs adjustable points from which the angles are calculated, allowing for clinician oversight and interpretable diagnostics for failure cases.

Artificial intelligence-based assessment of leg axis parameters shows excellent agreement with human raters: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the reliability and applicability of artificial intelligence (AI)-based analysis of leg axis parameters. We hypothesized that AI-based leg axis measurements would be less time-consuming and as accurate as those performed by human raters.

METHODS

The study protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). PubMed, Epistemonikos, and Web of Science were searched up to 24 February 2024, using a BOOLEAN search strategy. Titles and abstracts of identified records were screened through a stepwise process. Data extraction and quality assessment of the included papers were followed by a frequentist meta-analysis employing a common effect/random effects model with inverse variance and the Sidik-Jonkman heterogeneity estimator.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies encompassing 3192 patients were included in this meta-analysis. All studies compared AI-based leg axis measurements on long-leg radiographs (LLR) with those performed by human raters. The parameters hip knee ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), and joint-line convergence angle (JLCA) showed excellent agreement between AI and human raters. The AI system was approximately 3 min faster in reading standing long-leg anteroposterior radiographs (LLRs) compared with human raters.

CONCLUSION

AI-based assessment of leg axis parameters is an efficient, accurate, and time-saving procedure. The quality of AI-based assessment of the investigated parameters does not appear to be affected by the presence of implants or pathological conditions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Evaluation of a deep learning software for automated measurements on full-leg standing radiographs

BACKGROUND

Precise lower limb measurements are crucial for assessing musculoskeletal health; fully automated solutions have the potential to enhance standardization and reproducibility of these measurements. This study compared the measurements performed by BoneMetrics (Gleamer, Paris, France), a commercial artificial intelligence (AI)-based software, to expert manual measurements on anteroposterior full-leg standing radiographs.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a dataset comprising consecutive anteroposterior full-leg standing radiographs obtained from four imaging institutions. Key anatomical landmarks to define the hip-knee-ankle angle, pelvic obliquity, leg length, femoral length, and tibial length were annotated independently by two expert musculoskeletal radiologists and served as the ground truth. The performance of the AI was compared against these reference measurements using the mean absolute error, Bland-Altman analyses, and intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

A total of 175 anteroposterior full-leg standing radiographs from 167 patients were included in the final dataset (mean age = 49.9 ± 23.6 years old; 103 women and 64 men). Mean absolute error values were 0.30° (95% confidence interval [CI] [0.28, 0.32]) for the hip-knee-ankle angle, 0.75 mm (95% CI [0.60, 0.88]) for pelvic obliquity, 1.03 mm (95% CI [0.91,1.14]) for leg length from the top of the femoral head, 1.45 mm (95% CI [1.33, 1.60]) for leg length from the center of the femoral head, 0.95 mm (95% CI [0.85, 1.04]) for femoral length from the top of the femoral head, 1.23 mm (95% CI [1.12, 1.32]) for femoral length from the center of the femoral head, and 1.38 mm (95% CI [1.21, 1.52]) for tibial length. The Bland-Altman analyses revealed no systematic bias across all measurements. Additionally, the software exhibited excellent agreement with the gold-standard measurements with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values above 0.97 for all parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Automated measurements on anteroposterior full-leg standing radiographs offer a reliable alternative to manual assessments. The use of AI in musculoskeletal radiology has the potential to support physicians in their daily practice without compromising patient care standards.

Radiological Approach to Assessment of Lower-Limb Alignment-Coronal and Transverse Plane Analysis

Lower-limb alignment deformities constitute a significant clinical concern, as they can lead to serious complications, including progressive degenerative diseases and disabilities. Rotational deformities may give rise to conditions such as joint arthrosis, patellar instability, and the degeneration of the patellofemoral cartilage. Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation of lower-limb alignment is essential for the effective patient management, preoperative planning, and successful correction of these deformities. The primary assessment method employs full-length standing radiographs in the anteroposterior (AP) projection, which facilitates accurate measurements of the anatomical and mechanical axes of the lower limb, including angles and deviations. The outcomes of this analysis are vital for the meticulous planning of osteotomy and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In addition, computed tomography (CT) provides a specialized approach for the precise evaluation of femoral and tibial rotation. In this area, there are potential opportunities for the implementation of AI-based automated measurement systems.

Diagnostic performance of deep learning for leg length measurements on radiographs in leg length discrepancy: A systematic review

Purpose

To systematically review the literature regarding machine learning in leg length discrepancy (LLD) and to provide insight into the most relevant manuscripts on this topic in order to highlight the importance and future clinical implications of machine learning in the diagnosis and treatment of LLD.

Methods

A systematic electronic search was conducted using PubMed, OVID/Medline and Cochrane libraries in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Two observers independently screened the abstracts and titles of potential articles.

Results

A total of six studies were identified in the search. All measurements were calculated using standardized anterior-posterior long-leg radiographs. Five (83.3%) of the studies used measurements of the femoral length, tibial length and leg length to assess LLD, whereas one (16.6%) study used the iliac crest height difference to quantify LLD. The deep learning models showed excellent reliability in predicting all length measurements with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.98 to 1.0 and mean absolute error (MAE) values ranging from 0.11 to 0.45 cm. Three studies reported measurements of LLD, and the convolutional neural network model showed the lowest MAE of 0.13 cm in predicting LLD.

Conclusions

Machine learning models are effective and efficient in determining LLD. Implementation of these models may reduce cost, improve efficiency and lead to better overall patient outcomes.

Clinical Relevance

This review highlights the potential of deep learning (DL) algorithms for accurate and reliable measurement of lower limb length and leg length discrepancy (LLD) on long-leg radiographs. The reported mean absolute error and intraclass correlation coefficient values indicate that the performance of the DL models was comparable to that of radiologists, suggesting that DL-based assessments could potentially be used to automate the measurement of lower limb length and LLD in clinical practice.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

Automated Measurements of Long Leg Radiographs in Pediatric Patients: A Pilot Study to Evaluate an Artificial Intelligence-Based Algorithm

BACKGROUND

Assessment of long leg radiographs (LLRs) in pediatric orthopedic patients is an important but time-consuming routine task for clinicians. The goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of artificial intelligence (AI)-based leg angle measurement assistant software (LAMA) in measuring LLRs in pediatric patients, compared to traditional manual measurements.

METHODS

Eligible patients, aged 11 to 18 years old, referred for LLR between January and March 2022 were included. The study comprised 29 patients (58 legs, 377 measurements). The femur length, tibia length, full leg length (FLL), leg length discrepancy (LLD), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were measured automatically using LAMA and compared to manual measurements of a senior pediatric orthopedic surgeon and an advanced practitioner in radiography.

RESULTS

Correct landmark placement with AI was achieved in 76% of the cases for LLD measurements, 88% for FLL and femur length, 91% for mLDFA, 97% for HKA, 98% for mMPTA, and 100% for tibia length. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicated moderate to excellent agreement between AI and manual measurements, ranging from 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54 to 0.84) to 1.00 (95%CI: 1.00 to 1.00).

CONCLUSION

In cases of correct landmark placement, AI-based algorithm measurements on LLRs of pediatric patients showed high agreement with manual measurements.

Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal imaging: realistic clinical applications in the next decade

This article will provide a perspective review of the most extensively investigated deep learning (DL) applications for musculoskeletal disease detection that have the best potential to translate into routine clinical practice over the next decade. Deep learning methods for detecting fractures, estimating pediatric bone age, calculating bone measurements such as lower extremity alignment and Cobb angle, and grading osteoarthritis on radiographs have been shown to have high diagnostic performance with many of these applications now commercially available for use in clinical practice. Many studies have also documented the feasibility of using DL methods for detecting joint pathology and characterizing bone tumors on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, musculoskeletal disease detection on MRI is difficult as it requires multi-task, multi-class detection of complex abnormalities on multiple image slices with different tissue contrasts. The generalizability of DL methods for musculoskeletal disease detection on MRI is also challenging due to fluctuations in image quality caused by the wide variety of scanners and pulse sequences used in routine MRI protocols. The diagnostic performance of current DL methods for musculoskeletal disease detection must be further evaluated in well-designed prospective studies using large image datasets acquired at different institutions with different imaging parameters and imaging hardware before they can be fully implemented in clinical practice. Future studies must also investigate the true clinical benefits of current DL methods and determine whether they could enhance quality, reduce error rates, improve workflow, and decrease radiologist fatigue and burnout with all of this weighed against the costs.

Attitude of aspiring orthopaedic surgeons towards artificial intelligence: a multinational cross-sectional survey study

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perspectives of aspiring orthopaedic surgeons on artificial intelligence (AI), analysing how gender, AI knowledge, and technical inclination influence views on AI. Additionally, the extent to which recent AI advancements sway career decisions was assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A digital survey was distributed to student members of orthopaedic societies across Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Subgroup analyses explored how gender, AI knowledge, and technical inclination shape attitudes towards AI.

RESULTS

Of 174 total respondents, 86.2% (n = 150) intended to pursue a career in orthopaedic surgery and were included in the analysis. The majority (74.5%) reported 'basic' or 'no' knowledge about AI. Approximately 29.3% believed AI would significantly impact orthopaedics within 5 years, with another 35.3% projecting 5-10 years. AI was predominantly seen as an assistive tool (77.8%), without significant fear of job displacement. The most valued AI applications were identified as preoperative implant planning (85.3%), administrative tasks (84%), and image analysis (81.3%). Concerns arose regarding skill atrophy due to overreliance (69.3%), liability (68%), and diminished patient interaction (56%). The majority maintained a 'neutral' view on AI (53%), though 32.9% were 'enthusiastic'. A stronger focus on AI in medical education was requested by 81.9%. Most participants (72.8%) felt recent AI advancements did not alter their career decisions towards or away from the orthopaedic specialty. Statistical analysis revealed a significant association between AI literacy (p = 0.015) and technical inclination (p = 0.003). AI literacy did not increase significantly during medical education (p = 0.091).

CONCLUSIONS

Future orthopaedic surgeons exhibit a favourable outlook on AI, foreseeing its significant influence in the near future. AI literacy remains relatively low and showed no improvement during medical school. There is notable demand for improved AI-related education. The choice of orthopaedics as a specialty appears to be robust against the sway of recent AI advancements.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Cross-sectional survey study; level IV.

Orthopaedic surgeons display a positive outlook towards artificial intelligence: A survey among members of the AGA Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perspective of orthopaedic surgeons on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) and to evaluate the influence of experience, workplace setting and familiarity with digital solutions on views on AI.

Methods

Orthopaedic surgeons of the AGA Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery were invited to participate in an online, cross-sectional survey designed to gather information on professional background, subjective AI knowledge, opinion on the future impact of AI, openness towards different applications of AI, and perceived advantages and disadvantages of AI. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine the influence of experience, workplace setting and openness towards digital solutions on perspectives towards AI.

Results

Overall, 360 orthopaedic surgeons participated. The majority indicated average (43.6%) or rudimentary (38.1%) AI knowledge. Most (54.5%) expected AI to substantially influence orthopaedics within 5-10 years, predominantly as a complementary tool (91.1%). Preoperative planning (83.8%) was identified as the most likely clinical use case. A lack of consensus was observed regarding acceptable error levels. Time savings in preoperative planning (62.5%) and improved documentation (81%) were identified as notable advantages while declining skills of the next generation (64.5%) were rated as the most substantial drawback. There were significant differences in subjective AI knowledge depending on participants' experience (p = 0.021) and familiarity with digital solutions (p < 0.001), acceptable error levels depending on workplace setting (p = 0.004), and prediction of AI impact depending on familiarity with digital solutions (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The majority of orthopaedic surgeons in this survey anticipated a notable positive impact of AI on their field, primarily as an assistive technology. A lack of consensus on acceptable error levels of AI and concerns about declining skills among future surgeons were observed.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, cross-sectional study.

Deep learning generated lower extremity radiographic measurements are adequate for quick assessment of knee angular alignment and leg length determination

PURPOSE

Angular and longitudinal deformities of leg alignment create excessive stresses across joints, leading to pain and impaired function. Multiple measurements are used to assess these deformities on anteroposterior (AP) full-length radiographs. An artificial intelligence (AI) software automatically locates anatomical landmarks on AP full-length radiographs and performs 13 measurements to assess knee angular alignment and leg length. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the agreements in LLD and knee alignment measurements between an AI software and two board-certified radiologists in patients without metal implants. The secondary aim was to assess time savings achieved by AI.

METHODS

The measurements assessed in the study were hip-knee-angle (HKA), anatomical-tibiofemoral angle (aTFA), anatomical-mechanical-axis angle (AMA), joint-line-convergence angle (JLCA), mechanical-lateral-proximal-femur-angle (mLPFA), mechanical-lateral-distal-femur-angle (mLDFA), mechanical-medial-proximal-tibia-angle (mMPTA), mechanical-lateral-distal-tibia- angle (mLDTA), femur length, tibia length, full leg length, leg length discrepancy (LLD), and mechanical axis deviation (MAD). These measurements were performed by two radiologists and the AI software on 164 legs. Intraclass-correlation-coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses were used to assess the AI's performance.

RESULTS

The AI software set incorrect landmarks for 11/164 legs. Excluding these cases, ICCs between the software and radiologists were excellent for 12/13 variables (11/13 with outliers included), and the AI software met performance targets for 11/13 variables (9/13 with outliers included). The mean reading time for the AI algorithm and two readers, respectively, was 38.3, 435.0, and 625.0 s.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that, with few exceptions, this AI-based software reliably generated measurements for most variables in the study and provided substantial time savings.

Automatic measurement of lower limb alignment in portable devices based on deep learning for knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

For knee osteoarthritis patients, analyzing alignment of lower limbs is essential for therapy, which is currently measured from standing long-leg radiographs of anteroposterior X-ray (LLR) manually. To address the time wasting, poor reproducibility and inconvenience of use caused by existing methods, we present an automated measurement model in portable devices for assessing knee alignment from LLRs.

METHOD

We created a model and trained it with 837 conforming LLRs, and tested it using 204 LLRs without duplicates in a portable device. Both manual and model measurements were conducted independently, then we recorded knee alignment parameters such as Hip knee ankle angle (HKA), Joint line convergence angle (JCLA), Anatomical mechanical angle (AMA), mechanical Lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical Medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), and the time required. We evaluated the model's performance compared with manual results in various metrics.

RESULT

In both the validation and test sets, the average mean radial errors were 2.778 and 2.447 (P<0.05). The test results for native knee joints showed that 92.22%, 79.38%, 87.94%, 79.82%, and 80.16% of the joints reached angle deviation<1° for HKA, JCLA, AMA, mLDFA, and mMPTA. Additionally, for joints with prostheses, 90.14%, 93.66%, 86.62%, 83.80%, and 85.92% of the joints reached that. The Chi-square test did not reveal any significant differences between the manual and model measurements in subgroups (P>0.05). Furthermore, the Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement were less than ± 2° for HKA, JCLA, AMA, and mLDFA, and slightly more than ± 2 degrees for mMPTA.

CONCLUSION

The automatic measurement tool can assess the alignment of lower limbs in portable devices for knee osteoarthritis patients. The results are reliable, reproducible, and time-saving.

Lower Extremity Growth according to AI Automated Femorotibial Length Measurement on Slot-Scanning Radiographs in Pediatric Patients

Background Commonly used pediatric lower extremity growth standards are based on small, dated data sets. Artificial intelligence (AI) enables creation of updated growth standards. Purpose To train an AI model using standing slot-scanning radiographs in a racially diverse data set of pediatric patients to measure lower extremity length and to compare expected growth curves derived using AI measurements to those of the conventional Anderson-Green method. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included pediatric patients aged 0-21 years who underwent at least two slot-scanning radiographs in routine clinical care between August 2015 and February 2022. A Mask Region-based Convolutional Neural Network was trained to segment the femur and tibia on radiographs and measure total leg, femoral, and tibial length; accuracy was assessed with mean absolute error. AI measurements were used to create quantile polynomial regression femoral and tibial growth curves, which were compared with the growth curves of the Anderson-Green method for coverage based on the central 90% of the estimated growth distribution. Results In total, 1874 examinations in 523 patients (mean age, 12.7 years ± 2.8 [SD]; 349 female patients) were included; 40% of patients self-identified as White and not Hispanic or Latino, and the remaining 60% self-identified as belonging to a different racial or ethnic group. The AI measurement training, validation, and internal test sets included 114, 25, and 64 examinations, respectively. The mean absolute errors of AI measurements of the femur, tibia, and lower extremity in the test data set were 0.25, 0.27, and 0.33 cm, respectively. All 1874 examinations were used to generate growth curves. AI growth curves more accurately represented lower extremity growth in an external test set (n = 154 examinations) than the Anderson-Green method (90% coverage probability: 86.7% [95% CI: 82.9, 90.5] for AI model vs 73.4% [95% CI: 68.4, 78.3] for Anderson-Green method; χ2 test, P < .001). Conclusion Lower extremity growth curves derived from AI measurements on standing slot-scanning radiographs from a diverse pediatric data set enabled more accurate prediction of pediatric growth. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Multicentric development and validation of a multi-scale and multi-task deep learning model for comprehensive lower extremity alignment analysis

Osteoarthritis of the knee, a widespread cause of knee disability, is commonly treated in orthopedics due to its rising prevalence. Lower extremity misalignment, pivotal in knee injury etiology and management, necessitates comprehensive mechanical alignment evaluation via frequently-requested weight-bearing long leg radiographs (LLR). Despite LLR's routine use, current analysis techniques are error-prone and time-consuming. To address this, we conducted a multicentric study to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model for fully automated leg alignment assessment on anterior-posterior LLR, targeting enhanced reliability and efficiency. The DL model, developed using 594 patients' LLR and a 60%/10%/30% data split for training, validation, and testing, executed alignment analyses via a multi-step process, employing a detection network and nine specialized networks. It was designed to assess all vital anatomical and mechanical parameters for standard clinical leg deformity analysis and preoperative planning. Accuracy, reliability, and assessment duration were compared with three specialized orthopedic surgeons across two distinct institutional datasets (136 and 143 radiographs). The algorithm exhibited equivalent performance to the surgeons in terms of alignment accuracy (DL: 0.21 ± 0.18°to 1.06 ± 1.3°vs. OS: 0.21 ± 0.16°to 1.72 ± 1.96°), interrater reliability (ICC DL: 0.90 ± 0.05 to 1.0 ± 0.0 vs. ICC OS: 0.90 ± 0.03 to 1.0 ± 0.0), and clinically acceptable accuracy (DL: 53.9%-100% vs OS 30.8%-100%). Further, automated analysis significantly reduced analysis time compared to manual annotation (DL: 22 ± 0.6 s vs. OS; 101.7 ± 7 s, p ≤ 0.01). By demonstrating that our algorithm not only matches the precision of expert surgeons but also significantly outpaces them in both speed and consistency of measurements, our research underscores a pivotal advancement in harnessing AI to enhance clinical efficiency and decision-making in orthopaedics.

Fully automated assessment of the knee alignment on long leg radiographs following corrective knee osteotomies in patients with valgus or varus deformities

INTRODUCTION

The assessment of the knee alignment on long leg radiographs (LLR) postoperative to corrective knee osteotomies (CKOs) is highly dependent on the reader's expertise. Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms may help automate and standardise this process. The study aimed to analyse the reliability of an AI-algorithm for the evaluation of LLRs following CKOs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we analysed a validation cohort of 110 postoperative LLRs from 102 patients. All patients underwent CKO, including distal femoral (DFO), high tibial (HTO) and bilevel osteotomies. The agreement between manual measurements and the AI-algorithm was assessed for the mechanical axis deviation (MAD), hip knee ankle angle (HKA), anatomical-mechanical-axis-angle (AMA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), mechanical lateral proximal femur angle (mLPFA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibia angle (mMPTA) and mechanical lateral distal tibia angle (mLDTA), using the intra-class-correlation (ICC) coefficient between the readers, each reader and the AI and the mean of the manual reads and the AI-algorithm and Bland-Altman Plots between the manual reads and the AI software for the MAD, HKA, mLDFA and mMPTA.

RESULTS

In the validation cohort, the AI software showed excellent agreement with the manual reads (ICC: 0.81-0.99). The agreement between the readers (Inter-rater) showed excellent correlations (ICC: 0.95-0. The mean difference in the DFO group for the MAD, HKA, mLDFA and mMPTA were 0.50 mm, - 0.12°, 0.55° and 0.15°. In the HTO group the mean difference for the MAD, HKA, mLDFA and mMPTA were 0.36 mm, - 0.17°, 0.57° and 0.08°, respectively. Reliable outputs were generated in 95.4% of the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

 he application of AI-algorithms for the assessment of lower limb alignment on LLRs following CKOs shows reliable and accurate results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level III.

A Radiographic Analysis of Coronal Morphological Parameters of Lower Limbs in Chinese Non-knee Osteoarthritis Populations

OBJECTIVES

Analyzing the lower limb coronal morphological parameters in populations without knee osteoarthritis (KOA) holds significant value in predicting, diagnosing, and formulating surgical strategies for KOA. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the variability in these parameters among Chinese non-KOA populations, employing a substantial sample size.

METHODS

A cross-sectional retrospective analysis was performed on the Chinese non-KOA populations (n = 407; 49.9% females). The study employed an in-house developed artificial intelligence software to meticulously assess the coronal morphological parameters of all 814 lower limbs. The parameters evaluated included the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), weight-bearing line ratio (WBLR), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), mechanical lateral-proximal-femoral angle (mLPFA), mechanical lateral-distal-femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial-proximal-tibial angle (mMPTA), and mechanical lateral-distal-tibial angle (mLDTA). Differences in these parameters were compared between left and right limbs, different genders, and different age groups (with 50 years as the cut-off point).

RESULTS

HKAA and JLCA exhibited left-right differences (left vs. right: 178.2° ± 3.0° vs. 178.6° ± 2.9° for HKAA, p = 0.001; and 1.8° ± 1.5° vs. 1.4° ± 1.6° for JLCA, p < 0.001); except for the mLPFA, all other parameters show gender-related differences (male vs. female: 177.9° ± 2.8° vs. 179.0° ± 3.0° for HKAA, p < 0.001; 1.5° ± 1.5° vs. 1.8° ± 1.7° for JLCA, p = 0.003; 87.1° ± 2.1° vs. 88.1° ± 2.1° for mMPTA, p < 0.001; 90.2° ± 4.0° vs. 91.1° ± 3.2° for mLDTA, p < 0.001; 38.7% ± 12.9% vs. 43.6% ± 14.1% for WBLR, p < 0.001; and 87.7° ± 2.3° vs. 87.4° ± 2.7° for mLDTA, p = 0.045); mLPFA increase with age (younger vs. older: 90.1° ± 7.2° vs. 93.4° ± 4.9° for mLPFA, p < 0.001), while no statistical difference exists for other parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

There were differences in lower limb coronal morphological parameters among Chinese non-KOA populations between left and right sides, different genders, and age.

Enhanced deep learning model enables accurate alignment measurement across diverse institutional imaging protocols

BACKGROUND

Achieving consistent accuracy in radiographic measurements across different equipment and protocols is challenging. This study evaluates an advanced deep learning (DL) model, building upon a precursor, for its proficiency in generating uniform and precise alignment measurements in full-leg radiographs irrespective of institutional imaging differences.

METHODS

The enhanced DL model was trained on over 10,000 radiographs. Utilizing a segmented approach, it separately identified and evaluated regions of interest (ROIs) for the hip, knee, and ankle, subsequently integrating these regions. For external validation, 300 datasets from three distinct institutes with varied imaging protocols and equipment were employed. The study measured seven radiologic parameters: hip-knee-ankle angle, lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, joint line convergence angle, weight-bearing line ratio, joint line obliquity angle, and lateral distal tibial angle. Measurements by the model were compared with an orthopedic specialist's evaluations using inter-observer and intra-observer intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Additionally, the absolute error percentage in alignment measurements was assessed, and the processing duration for radiograph evaluation was recorded.

RESULTS

The DL model exhibited excellent performance, achieving an inter-observer ICC between 0.936 and 0.997, on par with an orthopedic specialist, and an intra-observer ICC of 1.000. The model's consistency was robust across different institutional imaging protocols. Its accuracy was particularly notable in measuring the hip-knee-ankle angle, with no instances of absolute error exceeding 1.5 degrees. The enhanced model significantly improved processing speed, reducing the time by 30-fold from an initial 10-11 s to 300 ms.

CONCLUSIONS

The enhanced DL model demonstrated its ability for accurate, rapid alignment measurements in full-leg radiographs, regardless of protocol variations, signifying its potential for broad clinical and research applicability.

Artificial intelligence-based analyses of varus leg alignment and after high tibial osteotomy show high accuracy and reproducibility

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based software for fully automated analysis of leg alignment pre- and postoperatively after high tibial osteotomy (HTO) on long-leg radiographs (LLRs).

METHODS

Long-leg radiographs of 95 patients with varus malalignment that underwent medial open-wedge HTO were analyzed pre- and postoperatively. Three investigators and an AI software using deep learning algorithms (LAMA™, ImageBiopsy Lab, Vienna, Austria) evaluated the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical axis deviation (MAD), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA). All measurements were performed twice and the performance of the AI software was compared with individual human readers using a Bayesian mixed model. In addition, the inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter-observer reliability was evaluated by comparing measurements from manual readers. The intra-reader variability for manual measurements and the AI-based software was evaluated using the intra-observer ICC.

RESULTS

Initial varus malalignment was corrected to slight valgus alignment after HTO. Measured by the AI algorithm and manually HKA (5.36° ± 3.03° and 5.47° ± 2.90° to - 0.70 ± 2.34 and - 0.54 ± 2.31), MAD (19.38 mm ± 11.39 mm and 20.17 mm ± 10.99 mm to - 2.68 ± 8.75 and - 2.10 ± 8.61) and MPTA (86.29° ± 2.42° and 86.08° ± 2.34° to 91.6 ± 3.0 and 91.81 ± 2.54) changed significantly from pre- to postoperative, while JLCA and mLDFA were not altered. The fully automated AI-based analyses showed no significant differences for all measurements compared with manual reads neither in native preoperative radiographs nor postoperatively after HTO. Mean absolute differences between the AI-based software and mean manual observer measurements were 0.5° or less for all measurements. Inter-observer ICCs for manual measurements were good to excellent for all measurements, except for JLCA, which showed moderate inter-observer ICCs. Intra-observer ICCs for manual measurements were excellent for all measurements, except for JLCA and for MPTA postoperatively. For the AI-aided analyses, repeated measurements showed entirely consistent results for all measurements with an intra-observer ICC of 1.0.

CONCLUSIONS

The AI-based software can provide fully automated analyses of native long-leg radiographs in patients with varus malalignment and after HTO with great accuracy and reproducibility and could support clinical workflows.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level III.

Evaluation of a newly designed deep learning-based algorithm for automated assessment of scapholunate distance in wrist radiography as a surrogate parameter for scapholunate ligament rupture and the correlation with arthroscopy

PURPOSE

Not diagnosed or mistreated scapholunate ligament (SL) tears represent a frequent cause of degenerative wrist arthritis. A newly developed deep learning (DL)-based automated assessment of the SL distance on radiographs may support clinicians in initial image interpretation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A pre-trained DL algorithm was specifically fine-tuned on static and dynamic dorsopalmar wrist radiography (training data set n = 201) for the automated assessment of the SL distance. Afterwards the DL algorithm was evaluated (evaluation data set n = 364 patients with n = 1604 radiographs) and correlated with results of an experienced human reader and with arthroscopic findings.

RESULTS

The evaluation data set comprised arthroscopically diagnosed SL insufficiency according to Geissler's stages 0-4 (56.5%, 2.5%, 5.5%, 7.5%, 28.0%). Diagnostic accuracy of the DL algorithm on dorsopalmar radiography regarding SL integrity was close to that of the human reader (e.g. differentiation of Geissler's stages ≤ 2 versus > 2 with a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 78% compared to 77% and 80%) with a correlation coefficient of 0.81 (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

A DL algorithm like this might become a valuable tool supporting clinicians' initial decision making on radiography regarding SL integrity and consequential triage for further patient management.

Fostering Excellence in Knee Arthroplasty: Developing Optimal Patient Care Pathways and Inspiring Knowledge Transfer of Advanced Surgical Techniques

Osteoarthritis of the knee is common. Early sports trauma or cartilage defects are risk factors for osteoarthritis. If conservative treatment fails, partial or total joint replacement is often performed. A joint replacement aims to restore physiological biomechanics and the quality of life of affected patients. Total knee arthroplasty is one of the most performed surgeries in musculoskeletal medicine. Several developments have taken place over the last decades that have truly altered the way we look at knee arthroplasty today. Some of the fascinating aspects will be presented and discussed in the present narrative review.

Gender-specific distribution of knee morphology according to CPAK and functional phenotype classification: analysis of 8739 osteoarthritic knees prior to total knee arthroplasty using artificial intelligence

PURPOSE

Osteoarthritis of the knee is commonly associated with malalignment of the lower limb. Recent classifications, as the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) and Functional Phenotype classification, describe the bony knee morphology in addition to the overall limb alignment. Data on distribution of these classifications is not sufficient in large populations. The aim of this study was to analyse the preoperative knee morphology with regard to the aforementioned classifications in long leg radiographs prior to total knee arthroplasty surgery using Artificial Intelligence.

METHODS

The cohort comprised 8739 preoperative long leg radiographs of 7456 patients of all total knee arthroplasty surgeries between 2009 and 2021 from our institutional database. The automated measurements were performed with the validated Artificial Intelligence software LAMA (ImageBiopsy Lab, Vienna) and included standardized axes and angles [hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femur angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibia angle (mMPTA), mechanical axis deviation (MAD), anatomic mechanic axis deviation (AMA) and joint line convergence angle (JLCA)]. CPAK and functional phenotype classifications were performed and all measurements were analysed for gender, age, and body mass index (BMI) within these subgroups.

RESULTS

Varus alignment was more common in men (m: 2008, 68.5%; f: 2953, 50.8%) while neutral (m: 578, 19.7%; f: 1357, 23.4%) and valgus (m: 345, 11.8%; f: 1498, 25.8%) alignment was more common in women. The most common morphotypes according to CPAK classification were CPAK Type I (2454; 28.1%), Type II (2383; 27.3%), and Type III (1830; 20.9%). An apex proximal joint line (CPAK Type VII, VIII and IX) was only found in 1.3% of all cases (n = 121). In men, CPAK Type I (1136; 38.8%) and CPAK Type II (799; 27.3%) were the most common types and women were spread more equally between CPAK Type I (1318; 22.7%), Type II (1584; 27.3%) and Type III (1494; 25.7%) (p < 0.001). The most common combination of femur and tibia types was NEUmLDFA0°,NEUmMPTA0° (m: 514, 17.5%; f: 1004, 17.3%), but men showed femoral varus more often. Patients with a higher BMI showed a significantly lower age at surgery (R2 = 0.09, p < 0.001). There were significant differences between men and women for all radiographic parameters (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Distribution in knee morphology with gender-specific differences highlights the wide range in osteoarthritic knees, characterized by CPAK and phenotype classification and may influence future surgical planning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The Role and Efficiency of an AI-Powered Software in the Evaluation of Lower Limb Radiographs before and after Total Knee Arthroplasty

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical imaging analysis has significantly impacted musculoskeletal radiology, offering enhanced accuracy and speed in radiograph evaluations. The potential of AI in clinical settings, however, remains underexplored. This research investigates the efficiency of a commercial AI tool in analyzing radiographs of patients who have undergone total knee arthroplasty. The study retrospectively analyzed 200 radiographs from 100 patients, comparing AI software measurements to expert assessments. Assessed parameters included axial alignments (MAD, AMA), femoral and tibial angles (mLPFA, mLDFA, mMPTA, mLDTA), and other key measurements including JLCA, HKA, and Mikulicz line. The tool demonstrated good to excellent agreement with expert metrics (ICC = 0.78-1.00), analyzed radiographs twice as fast (p < 0.001), yet struggled with accuracy for the JLCA (ICC = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.72-0.84), the Mikulicz line (ICC = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.32-0.90), and if patients had a body mass index higher than 30 kg/m2 (p < 0.001). It also failed to analyze 45 (22.5%) radiographs, potentially due to image overlay or unique patient characteristics. These findings underscore the AI software's potential in musculoskeletal radiology but also highlight the necessity for further development for effective utilization in diverse clinical scenarios. Subsequent studies should explore the integration of AI tools in routine clinical practice and their impact on patient care.

Deep Learning for Automated Measurement of Patellofemoral Anatomic Landmarks

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral anatomy has not been well characterized. Applying deep learning to automatically measure knee anatomy can provide a better understanding of anatomy, which can be a key factor in improving outcomes.

METHODS

483 total patients with knee CT imaging (April 2017-May 2022) from 6 centers were selected from a cohort scheduled for knee arthroplasty and a cohort with healthy knee anatomy. A total of 7 patellofemoral landmarks were annotated on 14,652 images and approved by a senior musculoskeletal radiologist. A two-stage deep learning model was trained to predict landmark coordinates using a modified ResNet50 architecture initialized with self-supervised learning pretrained weights on RadImageNet. Landmark predictions were evaluated with mean absolute error, and derived patellofemoral measurements were analyzed with Bland-Altman plots. Statistical significance of measurements was assessed by paired t-tests.

RESULTS

Mean absolute error between predicted and ground truth landmark coordinates was 0.20/0.26 cm in the healthy/arthroplasty cohort. Four knee parameters were calculated, including transepicondylar axis length, transepicondylar-posterior femur axis angle, trochlear medial asymmetry, and sulcus angle. There were no statistically significant parameter differences (p > 0.05) between predicted and ground truth measurements in both cohorts, except for the healthy cohort sulcus angle.

CONCLUSION

Our model accurately identifies key trochlear landmarks with ~0.20-0.26 cm accuracy and produces human-comparable measurements on both healthy and pathological knees. This work represents the first deep learning regression model for automated patellofemoral annotation trained on both physiologic and pathologic CT imaging at this scale. This novel model can enhance our ability to analyze the anatomy of the patellofemoral compartment at scale.

Body height estimation from automated length measurements on standing long leg radiographs using artificial intelligence

Artificial-intelligence (AI) allows large-scale analyses of long-leg-radiographs (LLRs). We used this technology to derive an update for the classical regression formulae by Trotter and Gleser, which are frequently used to infer stature based on long-bone measurements. We analyzed calibrated, standing LLRs from 4200 participants taken between 2015 and 2020. Automated landmark placement was conducted using the AI-algorithm LAMA™ and the measurements were used to determine femoral, tibial and total leg-length. Linear regression equations were subsequently derived for stature estimation. The estimated regression equations have a shallower slope and larger intercept in males and females (Femur-male: slope = 2.08, intercept = 77.49; Femur-female: slope = 1.9, intercept = 79.81) compared to the formulae previously derived by Trotter and Gleser 1952 (Femur-male: slope = 2.38, intercept = 61.41; Femur-female: slope = 2.47, intercept = 54.13) and Trotter and Gleser 1958 (Femur-male: slope = 2.32, intercept = 65.53). All long-bone measurements showed a high correlation (r ≥ 0.76) with stature. The linear equations we derived tended to overestimate stature in short persons and underestimate stature in tall persons. The differences in slopes and intercepts from those published by Trotter and Gleser (1952, 1958) may result from an ongoing secular increase in stature. Our study illustrates that AI-algorithms are a promising new tool enabling large-scale measurements.

Can an artificial intelligence powered software reliably assess pelvic radiographs?

PURPOSE

Despite advances of three-dimensional imaging pelvic radiographs remain the cornerstone in the evaluation of the hip joint. However, large inter- and intra-rater variabilities were reported due to subjective landmark setting. Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered software applications could improve the reproducibility of pelvic radiograph evaluation by providing standardized measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and agreement of a newly developed AI algorithm for the evaluation of pelvic radiographs.

METHODS

Three-hundred pelvic radiographs from 280 patients with different degrees of acetabular coverage and osteoarthritis (Tönnis Grade 0 to 3) were evaluated. Reliability and agreement between manual measurements and the outputs of the AI software were assessed for the lateral-center-edge (LCE) angle, neck-shaft angle, sharp angle, acetabular index, as well as the femoral head extrusion index.

RESULTS

The AI software provided reliable results in 94.3% (283/300). The ICC values ranged between 0.73 for the Acetabular Index to 0.80 for the LCE Angle. Agreement between readers and AI outputs, given by the standard error of measurement (SEM), was good for hips with normal coverage (LCE-SEM: 3.4°) and no osteoarthritis (LCE-SEM: 3.3°) and worse for hips with undercoverage (LCE-SEM: 5.2°) or severe osteoarthritis (LCE-SEM: 5.1°).

CONCLUSION

AI-powered applications are a reliable alternative to manual evaluation of pelvic radiographs. While being accurate for patients with normal acetabular coverage and mild signs of osteoarthritis, it needs improvement in the evaluation of patients with hip dysplasia and severe osteoarthritis.

Artificial intelligence-based computer-aided system for knee osteoarthritis assessment increases experienced orthopaedic surgeons' agreement rate and accuracy

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to (1) analyze the impact of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based computer system on the accuracy and agreement rate of board-certified orthopaedic surgeons (= senior readers) to detect X-ray features indicative of knee OA in comparison to unaided assessment and (2) compare the results to those of senior residents (= junior readers).

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-four unilateral knee X-rays from the OAI study were analyzed regarding Kellgren-Lawrence grade, joint space narrowing (JSN), sclerosis and osteophyte OARSI grade by computerized methods. Images were rated for these parameters by three senior readers using two modalities: plain X-ray (unaided) and X-ray presented alongside reports from a computer-assisted detection system (aided). After exclusion of nine images with incomplete annotation, intraclass correlations between readers were calculated for both modalities among 115 images, and reader performance was compared to ground truth (OAI consensus). Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were also calculated and the results were compared to those from a previous study on junior readers.

RESULTS

With the aided modality, senior reader agreement rates for KL grade (2.0-fold), sclerosis (1.42-fold), JSN (1.37-fold) and osteophyte OARSI grades (3.33-fold) improved significantly. Reader specificity and accuracy increased significantly for all features when using the aided modality compared to the gold standard. On the other hand, sensitivity only increased for OA diagnosis, whereas it decreased (without statistical significance) for all other features. With aided analysis, senior readers reached similar agreement and accuracy rates as junior readers, with both surpassing AI performance.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of AI-based computer-aided assessment systems can increase the agreement rate and overall accuracy for knee OA diagnosis among board-certified orthopaedic surgeons. Thus, use of this software may improve the standard of care for knee OA detection and diagnosis in the future.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Automated Artificial Intelligence-Based Assessment of Lower Limb Alignment Validated on Weight-Bearing Pre- and Postoperative Full-Leg Radiographs

The assessment of the knee alignment using standing weight-bearing full-leg radiographs (FLR) is a standardized method. Determining the load-bearing axis of the leg requires time-consuming manual measurements. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a novel algorithm based on artificial intelligence (AI) for the automated assessment of lower limb alignment. In the first stage, a customized mask-RCNN model was trained to automatically detect and segment anatomical structures and implants in FLR. In the second stage, four region-specific neural network models (adaptations of UNet) were trained to automatically place anatomical landmarks. In the final stage, this information was used to automatically determine five key lower limb alignment angles. For the validation dataset, weight-bearing, antero-posterior FLR were captured preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Preoperative images were measured by the operating orthopedic surgeon and an independent physician. Postoperative images were measured by the second rater only. The final validation dataset consisted of 95 preoperative and 105 postoperative FLR. The detection rate for the different angles ranged between 92.4% and 98.9%. Human vs. human inter-(ICCs: 0.85−0.99) and intra-rater (ICCs: 0.95−1.0) reliability analysis achieved significant agreement. The ICC-values of human vs. AI inter-rater reliability analysis ranged between 0.8 and 1.0 preoperatively and between 0.83 and 0.99 postoperatively (all p < 0.001). An independent and external validation of the proposed algorithm on pre- and postoperative FLR, with excellent reliability for human measurements, could be demonstrated. Hence, the algorithm might allow for the objective and time saving analysis of large datasets and support physicians in daily routine.

Fully automated measurement on coronal alignment of lower limbs using deep convolutional neural networks on radiographic images

Background

A deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) system is proposed to measure the lower limb parameters of the mechanical lateral distal femur angle (mLDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), and mechanical axis of the lower limbs.

Methods

Standing X-rays of 1000 patients’ lower limbs were examined for the DCNN and assigned to training, validation, and test sets. A coarse-to-fine network was employed to locate 20 key landmarks on both limbs that first recognised the regions of hip, knee, and ankle, and subsequently outputted the key points in each sub-region from a full-length X-ray. Finally, information from these key landmark locations was used to calculate the above five parameters.

Results

The DCNN system showed high consistency (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.91) for all five lower limb parameters. Additionally, the mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) of all angle predictions were lower than 3° for both the left and right limbs. The MAE of the mechanical axis of the lower limbs was 1.124 mm and 1.416 mm and the RMSE was 1.032 mm and 1.321 mm, for the right and left limbs, respectively. The measurement time of the DCNN system was 1.8 ± 1.3 s, which was significantly shorter than that of experienced radiologists (616.8 ± 48.2 s, t = -180.4, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The proposed DCNN system can automatically measure mLDFA, MPTA, LDTA, JLCA, and the mechanical axis of the lower limbs, thus helping physicians manage lower limb alignment accurately and efficiently.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05818-4.

Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Radiography Analysis: A Narrative Review

Artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine is a rapidly growing field. In orthopedics, the clinical implementations of AI have not yet reached their full potential. Deep learning algorithms have shown promising results in computed radiographs for fracture detection, classification of OA, bone age, as well as automated measurements of the lower extremities. Studies investigating the performance of AI compared to trained human readers often show equal or better results, although human validation is indispensable at the current standards. The objective of this narrative review is to give an overview of AI in medicine and summarize the current applications of AI in orthopedic radiography imaging. Due to the different AI software and study design, it is difficult to find a clear structure in this field. To produce more homogeneous studies, open-source access to AI software codes and a consensus on study design should be aimed for.

Artificial intelligence enables reliable and standardized measurements of implant alignment in long leg radiographs with total knee arthroplasties

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of a newly developed AI-algorithm for the evaluation of long leg radiographs (LLR) after total knee arthroplasties (TKA).

METHODS

In the validation cohort 200 calibrated LLRs of eight different common unconstrained and constrained knee systems were analysed. Accuracy and reproducibility of the AI-algorithm were compared to manual reads regarding the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) as well as femoral (FCA) and tibial component (TCA) angles. In the evaluation cohort all institutional LLRs with TKAs in 2018 (n = 1312) were evaluated to assess the algorithms' ability of handling large data sets. Intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient and mean absolute deviation (sMAD) were calculated to assess conformity between the AI software and manual reads.

RESULTS

Validation cohort: The AI-software was reproducible on 96% and reliable on 92.1% of LLRs with an output and showed excellent reliability in all measured angles (ICC > 0.97) compared to manual measurements. Excellent results were found for primary unconstrained TKAs. In constrained TKAs landmark setting on the femoral and tibial component failed in 12.5% of LLRs (n = 9). Evaluation cohort: Mean measurements for all postoperative TKAs (n = 1240) were 0.2° varus ± 2.5° (HKA), 89.3° ± 1.9° (FCA), and 89.1° ± 1.6° (TCA). Mean measurements on preoperative revision TKAs (n = 74) were 1.6 varus ± 6.4° (HKA), 90.5° ± 3.1° (FCA), and 88.9° ± 4.1° (TCA).

CONCLUSIONS

AI-powered applications are reliable for automated analysis of lower limb alignment on LLRs with TKAs. They are capable of handling large data sets and could, therefore, lead to more standardized and efficient postoperative quality controls.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level III.