1
|
Barat M, Crombé A, Boeken T, Dacher JN, Si-Mohamed S, Dohan A, Chassagnon G, Lecler A, Greffier J, Nougaret S, Soyer P. Imaging in France: 2024 Update. Can Assoc Radiol J 2025; 76:221-231. [PMID: 39367786 DOI: 10.1177/08465371241288425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiology in France has made major advances in recent years through innovations in research and clinical practice. French institutions have developed innovative imaging techniques and artificial intelligence applications in the field of diagnostic imaging and interventional radiology. These include, but are not limited to, a more precise diagnosis of cancer and other diseases, research in dual-energy and photon-counting computed tomography, new applications of artificial intelligence, and advanced treatments in the field of interventional radiology. This article aims to explore the major research initiatives and technological advances that are shaping the landscape of radiology in France. By highlighting key contributions in diagnostic imaging, artificial intelligence, and interventional radiology, we provide a comprehensive overview of how these innovations are improving patient outcomes, enhancing diagnostic accuracy, and expanding the possibilities for minimally invasive therapies. As the field continues to evolve, France's position at the forefront of radiological research ensures that these innovations will play a central role in addressing current healthcare challenges and improving patient care on a global scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime Barat
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France
| | - Amandine Crombé
- Department of Radiology, Pellegrin University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
- SARCOTARGET Team, Bordeaux Institute of Oncology (BRIC) INSERM U1312, Bordeaux, France
| | - Tom Boeken
- Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France
- Department of Vascular and Oncological Interventional Radiology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Paris, France
- HEKA INRIA, INSERM PARCC U 970, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Nicolas Dacher
- Cardiac Imaging Unit, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Rouen, Rouen, France
- UNIROUEN, Inserm U1096, UFR Médecine Pharmacie, Rouen, France
| | - Salim Si-Mohamed
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
- Université de Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, France
- CNRS, INSERM, CREATIS UMR 5220, U1206, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Anthony Dohan
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Chassagnon
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France
| | - Augustin Lecler
- Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France
- Department of Neuroradiology, Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Joel Greffier
- IMAGINE UR UM 103, Montpellier University, Department of Medical Imaging, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France
| | - Stéphanie Nougaret
- Department of Radiology, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
- PINKCC Lab, IRCM, U1194, Montpellier, France
| | - Philippe Soyer
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thurlow PC, Azhideh A, Ho CK, Stratchko LM, Pooyan A, Alipour E, Hosseini N, Chalian M. Thermal Protection Techniques for Image-guided Musculoskeletal Ablation. Radiographics 2025; 45:e240078. [PMID: 40048387 DOI: 10.1148/rg.240078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2025]
Abstract
Percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation has gained wide acceptance among physicians for the treatment of benign and malignant tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Increasing evidence to support the efficacy of thermal ablation techniques in primary and adjuvant treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas, treatment of oligometastatic disease to bone and soft tissue, and metastatic pain palliation has positioned interventional oncology alongside surgery, systemic therapies, and radiation therapy as the fourth pillar of modern comprehensive cancer care. Despite the expanding indications and increasing use in clinical practice, thermal ablation carries a significant risk of injury to the adjacent vulnerable structures, predominantly the skin, bowel, and neural structures. Knowledge of the mechanism of action of each thermal ablation modality informs the physician of the attendant risks associated with a particular modality. Thermal ablation mechanisms can be divided into hypothermic (cryoablation) and hyperthermic (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, high-intensity focused US, or laser). Active thermal protection techniques include hydrodissection, pneumodissection, direct skin thermal protection, and physical displacement techniques. Passive thermal protection techniques include temperature monitoring, biofeedback, and neurophysiologic monitoring. The authors provide an overview of the mechanism of action of the most commonly used thermal ablation modalities, review the thermal injury risks associated with these modalities, and introduce the active and passive thermal protective techniques critical to safe and effective musculoskeletal ablative therapy. ©RSNA, 2025 See the invited commentary by Tomasian and Jennings in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter C Thurlow
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105 (P.C.T., A.A., A.P., E.A., N.H., M.C.); Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (C.K.H.); and Department of Radiology, Penn State Health, Hershey, Pa (L.M.S.)
| | - Arash Azhideh
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105 (P.C.T., A.A., A.P., E.A., N.H., M.C.); Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (C.K.H.); and Department of Radiology, Penn State Health, Hershey, Pa (L.M.S.)
| | - Corey K Ho
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105 (P.C.T., A.A., A.P., E.A., N.H., M.C.); Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (C.K.H.); and Department of Radiology, Penn State Health, Hershey, Pa (L.M.S.)
| | - Lindsay M Stratchko
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105 (P.C.T., A.A., A.P., E.A., N.H., M.C.); Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (C.K.H.); and Department of Radiology, Penn State Health, Hershey, Pa (L.M.S.)
| | - Atefe Pooyan
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105 (P.C.T., A.A., A.P., E.A., N.H., M.C.); Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (C.K.H.); and Department of Radiology, Penn State Health, Hershey, Pa (L.M.S.)
| | - Ehsan Alipour
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105 (P.C.T., A.A., A.P., E.A., N.H., M.C.); Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (C.K.H.); and Department of Radiology, Penn State Health, Hershey, Pa (L.M.S.)
| | - Nastaran Hosseini
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105 (P.C.T., A.A., A.P., E.A., N.H., M.C.); Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (C.K.H.); and Department of Radiology, Penn State Health, Hershey, Pa (L.M.S.)
| | - Majid Chalian
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105 (P.C.T., A.A., A.P., E.A., N.H., M.C.); Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (C.K.H.); and Department of Radiology, Penn State Health, Hershey, Pa (L.M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Spinnato P. Editorial Comment: Percutaneous Cryoablation for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Soft-Tissue Sarcomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024; 223:e2431891. [PMID: 39194313 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.24.31891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2024]
|
4
|
McGill KC, Baal JD, Bucknor MD. Update on musculoskeletal applications of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound. Skeletal Radiol 2024; 53:1869-1877. [PMID: 38363419 PMCID: PMC11303439 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04620-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2024] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a noninvasive, incisionless, radiation-free technology used to ablate tissue deep within the body. This technique has gained increased popularity following FDA approval for treatment of pain related to bone metastases and limited approval for treatment of osteoid osteoma. MRgFUS delivers superior visualization of soft tissue targets in unlimited imaging planes and precision in targeting and delivery of thermal dose which is all provided during real-time monitoring using MR thermometry. This paper provides an overview of the common musculoskeletal applications of MRgFUS along with updates on clinical outcomes and discussion of future applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin C McGill
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Suite M391, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
| | - Joe D Baal
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Suite M391, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Matthew D Bucknor
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Suite M391, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu XW, Wang ZG, Jin P, Yu LL, Sun G. Clinical Efficacy of Percutaneous Osteoplasty Under Fluoroscopy and Cone-Beam CT Guidance for Painful Sternal Metastases: A Case Series. Int Med Case Rep J 2024; 17:439-445. [PMID: 38765866 PMCID: PMC11100486 DOI: 10.2147/imcrj.s454210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Although percutaneous osteoplasty (POP) has been widely accepted and is now being performed for the treatment of painful bone metastases outside the spine. It is emerging as one of the most promising procedures for patients with painful bone metastasis who are unsuitable for surgery or who show resistance to radiotherapy and/or analgesic therapies. However, there are only scarce reports regarding osteoplasty in painful sternal metastases. Subjects and Method We report four patients with sternal metastases suffered with severe pain of anterior chest wall. The original tumors included lung cancer and thyroid cancer. For the initially pain medication failing, all the four patients received POP procedure under fluoroscopic and cone-beam CT (CBCT) guidance, and obtained satisfying resolution of painful symptoms at 6-month postop follow-up. Conclusion POP is a safe and effective treatment for pain caused by metastatic bone tumors in the sternum. In practice, however, percutaneous puncture of pathologic sternal fractures can be a challenge because of the long flat contour and the defacement by lytic tumor of bony landmarks. We find that the use of fluoroscopic and CBCT can facilitate POP for flat bone fractures with displacing the trajectory planning, needle advancement, and cement delivery in time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xun-Wei Liu
- Department of Radiology, The 960th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Jinan, Shandong Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhi-Guo Wang
- Department of Radiology, The 960th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Jinan, Shandong Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Peng Jin
- Department of Radiology, The 960th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Jinan, Shandong Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Li-Li Yu
- Department of Information, The 960th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Jinan, Shandong Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Gang Sun
- Department of Radiology, The 960th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Jinan, Shandong Province, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leporace M, Lancellotta V, Baccolini V, Calabria F, Castrovillari F, Filippiadis DK, Tagliaferri L, Iezzi R. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound versus percutaneous thermal ablation in local control of bone oligometastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2024; 129:291-306. [PMID: 38302831 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01780-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The percutaneous thermal ablation techniques (pTA) are radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, and microwave ablation, suitable for the treatment of bone oligometastases. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a noninvasive ablation technique. OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness and safety of MRgFUS and pTA for treating bone oligometastases and their complications. METHODS Studies were selected with a PICO/PRISMA protocol: pTA or MRgFUS in patients with bone oligometastases; non-exclusive curative treatment. Exclusion criteria were: primary bone tumor; concurrent radiation therapy; palliative therapy; and absence of imaging at follow-up. PubMed, BioMed Central, and Scopus were searched. The modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed articles quality. For each treatment (pTA and MRgFUS), we conducted two separate random-effects meta-analyses to estimate the pooled effectiveness and safety. The effectiveness was assessed by combining the proportions of treated lesions achieving local tumor control (LTC); the safety by combining the complications rates of treated patients. Meta-regression analyses were performed to identify any outcome predictor. RESULTS A total of 24 articles were included. Pooled LTC rate for MRgFUS was 84% (N = 7, 95% CI 66-97%, I2 = 74.7%) compared to 65% of pTA (N = 17, 95% CI 51-78%, I2 = 89.3%). Pooled complications rate was similar, respectively, 13% (95% CI 1-32%, I2 = 81.0%) for MRgFUS and 12% (95% CI 8-18%, I2 = 39.9%) for pTA, but major complications were recorded with pTA only. The meta-regression analyses, including technique type, study design, tumor, and follow-up, found no significant predictors. DISCUSSION The effectiveness and safety of the two techniques were found comparable, even though MRgFUS is a noninvasive treatment that did not cause any major complication. Limited data availability on MRgFUS and the lack of direct comparisons with pTA may affect these findings. CONCLUSIONS MRgFUS can be a valid, safe, and noninvasive treatment for bone oligometastases. Direct comparison studies are needed to confirm its promising benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Leporace
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Theragnostics, "Mariano Santo" Cosenza Hospital, Cosenza, Italy.
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Baccolini
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ferdinando Calabria
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Theragnostics, "Mariano Santo" Cosenza Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
| | | | - Dimitrios K Filippiadis
- Second Department of Radiology, University General Hospital "ATTIKON" - Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Iezzi
- Dipartimento Di Diagnostica Per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica Ed Ematologia - Istituto Di Radiologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Institute of Radiology - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hay AN, Ruger L, Hsueh A, Vickers E, Klahn S, Vlaisavljevich E, Tuohy J. A review of the development of histotripsy for extremity tumor ablation with a canine comparative oncology model to inform human treatments. Int J Hyperthermia 2023; 40:2274802. [PMID: 37994796 PMCID: PMC10669778 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2023.2274802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a devasting disease resulting in millions of deaths worldwide in both humans and companion animals, including dogs. Treatment of cancer is complex and challenging and therefore often multifaceted, as in the case of osteosarcoma (OS) and soft tissue sarcoma (STS). OS predominantly involves the appendicular skeleton and STS commonly develops in the extremities, resulting in treatment challenges due to the need to balance wide-margin resections to achieve local oncological control against the functional outcomes for the patient. To achieve wide tumor resection, invasive limb salvage surgery is often required, and the patient is at risk for numerous complications which can ultimately lead to impaired limb function and mobility. The advent of tumor ablation techniques offers the exciting potential of developing noninvasive or minimally invasive treatment options for extremity tumors. One promising innovative tumor ablation technique with strong potential to serve as a noninvasive limb salvage treatment for extremity tumor patients is histotripsy. Histotripsy is a novel, noninvasive, non-thermal, and non-ionizing focused ultrasound technique which uses controlled acoustic cavitation to mechanically disintegrate tissue with high precision. In this review, we present the ongoing development of histotripsy as a non-surgical alternative for extremity tumors and highlight the value of spontaneously occurring OS and STS in the pet dog as a comparative oncology research model to advance this field of histotripsy research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alayna N. Hay
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA
- Virginia Tech Animal Cancer Care and Research Center, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Roanoke, VA
| | - Lauren Ruger
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA
| | - Andy Hsueh
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA
- Virginia Tech Animal Cancer Care and Research Center, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Roanoke, VA
| | - Elliana Vickers
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA
- Virginia Tech Animal Cancer Care and Research Center, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Roanoke, VA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA
- Graduate program in Translation Biology, Medicine and Health, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Roanoke, VA
| | - Shawna Klahn
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA
- Virginia Tech Animal Cancer Care and Research Center, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Roanoke, VA
| | - Eli Vlaisavljevich
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA
| | - Joanne Tuohy
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA
- Virginia Tech Animal Cancer Care and Research Center, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Roanoke, VA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Key BM, Callstrom MR, Filippiadis D. Musculoskeletal Interventional Oncology: A Contemporary Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 221:503-516. [PMID: 37222277 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.29110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Musculoskeletal interventional oncology is an emerging field that addresses the limitations of conventional therapies for bone and soft-tissue tumors. The field's growth has been driven by evolving treatment paradigms, expanding society guidelines, mounting supportive literature, technologic advances, and cross-specialty collaboration with medical, surgical, and radiation oncology. Safe, effective, and durable pain palliation, local control, and stabilization of musculoskeletal tumors are increasingly achieved through an expanding array of contemporary minimally invasive percutaneous image-guided treatments, including ablation, osteoplasty, vertebral augmentation (with or without mechanical reinforcement via implants), osseous consolidation via percutaneous screw fixation (with or without osteoplasty), tumor embolization, and neurolysis. These interventions may be used for curative or palliative indications and can be readily combined with systemic therapies. Therapeutic approaches include the combination of different interventional oncology techniques as well as the sequential application of such techniques with other local treatments, including surgery or radiation. This article reviews the current practice of interventional oncology treatments for the management of patients with bone and soft-tissue tumors with a focus on emerging technologies and techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon M Key
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Rm 2803, Milwaukee, WI 53226
| | - Matthew R Callstrom
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Rm 2803, Milwaukee, WI 53226
| | - Dimitrios Filippiadis
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University General Hospital "Attikon" Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Papalexis N, Savarese LG, Peta G, Errani C, Tuzzato G, Spinnato P, Ponti F, Miceli M, Facchini G. The New Ice Age of Musculoskeletal Intervention: Role of Percutaneous Cryoablation in Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:6744-6770. [PMID: 37504355 PMCID: PMC10377811 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
In the rapidly evolving field of interventional oncology, minimally invasive methods, including CT-guided cryoablation, play an increasingly important role in tumor treatment, notably in bone and soft tissue cancers. Cryoablation works using compressed gas-filled probes to freeze tumor cells to temperatures below -20 °C, exploiting the Joule-Thompson effect. This cooling causes cell destruction by forming intracellular ice crystals and disrupting blood flow through endothelial cell damage, leading to local ischemia and devascularization. Coupling this with CT technology enables precise tumor targeting, preserving healthy surrounding tissues and decreasing postoperative complications. This review reports the most important literature on CT-guided cryoablation's application in musculoskeletal oncology, including sarcoma, bone metastases, and bone and soft tissue benign primary tumors, reporting on the success rate, recurrence rate, complications, and technical aspects to maximize success for cryoablation in the musculoskeletal system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Papalexis
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Leonor Garbin Savarese
- Department of Medical Imaging, Hematology and Clinical Oncology, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14049-09, Brazil
| | - Giuliano Peta
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Costantino Errani
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Gianmarco Tuzzato
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Spinnato
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Federico Ponti
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Miceli
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Facchini
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yeo SY, Bratke G, Grüll H. High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Treatment of Bone Malignancies-20 Years of History. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010108. [PMID: 36612105 PMCID: PMC9817683 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) is the only non-invasive method for percutaneous thermal ablation of tissue, with treatments typically performed either under magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound guidance. Since this method allows efficient heating of bony structures, it has found not only early use in treatment of bone pain, but also in local treatment of malignant bone tumors. This review of 20 years of published studies shows that HIFU is a very efficient method for rapid pain relief, can provide local tumor control and has a very patient-friendly safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sin Yuin Yeo
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Grischa Bratke
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Holger Grüll
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
- Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Cologne, Greinstr. 6, 50939 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|