Positron emission tomography in the management of lymphomas: a summary

Value of positron emission tomography in staging ocular adnexal lymphomas and evaluating their response to therapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

An observational case series to assess the value of positron emission tomography (PET) in staging ocular adnexal lymphomas and evaluating their response to therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The clinical records of 16 consecutive patients with ocular adnexal lymphoma for whom pretreatment and posttreatment PET scans and corresponding computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were available were compared.

RESULTS

Pretreatment PET scans demonstrated fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positive lesions in 15 orbits of 12 patients. In 1 patient with low-grade follicular lymphoma of the orbit, PET revealed an additional focus of lymphoma in the deltoid muscle that was missed on clinical examination and conventional radiography. All of the posttreatment PET scans showed complete resolution of FDG uptake, suggesting good response to therapy. However, posttreatment CT and MRI scans demonstrated residual masses in 3 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PET is valuable for initial staging of ocular adnexal lymphomas and may be a good adjunct to conventional imaging in evaluation of response to therapy.

18F-FDG PET in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma

To evaluate the sensitivity of 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. A total of 32 patients with a histological diagnosis of extra-nodal MALT lymphoma were referred to the PET Centers in the last 2 years (2003 - 2004) and scanned with 18F-FDG-PET following standard procedures. Overall, the results of 50 18F-FDG-PET scans performed in either active disease state or in complete remission were reviewed. Sites of primary disease included stomach, lung, parotid, skin, orbit, mandible, esophagus and uterus. This study retrospectively enrolled 26 patients with known active disease. 18F-FDG-PET was true positive (TP) in 21/26 patients and false negative (FN) in 5/26. Sensitivity of 18F FDG-PET for extra-nodal MALT was 81%. The data show that 18FDG-PET is a useful diagnostic tool in order to stage, restage or monitor disease in patients with extra-nodal MALT lymphoma.

Potential pitfalls of 18F-FDG PET in a large series of patients treated for malignant lymphoma: prevalence and scan interpretation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence and scan interpretation criteria useful in identifying non-tumoural F-FDG focal uptakes (potential pitfalls) in patients who had been previously treated for a malignant lymphoma studied by positron emission tomography (PET).

MATERIALS

Nine hundred and ninety-six consecutive PET scans obtained in 706 patients with malignant lymphoma were reviewed. All patients had been previously treated by first-line chemo-radiotherapy, plus surgery when required, and were then studied by FDG PET to investigate suspected recurrence at doubtful or inconclusive conventional radiological imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging). PET was obtained with patients in the fasted condition and after i.v. injection of 370 MBq of F-FDG; imaging was acquired 60-90 min later. In patients with focal FDG uptake the final diagnosis was reached on the basis of histological findings or long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty-one of 134 PET scans (23.1%) showing focal FDG uptake were diagnosed as non-tumoural radiotracer uptake, related to the presence of brown fat in seven cases, thymic hyperplasia in five, muscles contraction in four, lymph node unspecific inflammation in four, mediastinal/pulmonary unspecific inflammation in four, gastritis in two, colitis in two, bacterial abscess in one, lactating breast in one, and herpes zoster in one. Each of the above cited situations has been reported in the literature, generally in the form of sporadic reports, as a potential cause of misinterpretation (false positive) in reading a PET scan with the potential for incorrect patient management. An accurate diagnosis in these patients was important for the following therapeutic decision making.

CONCLUSIONS

In the whole series of patients with treated malignant lymphoma, the prevalence of non-tumoural FDG focal uptake during follow-up was relatively low (3.1%); conversely, it was relatively high when considering the sub-group of 'positive' PET only (23.1%). The importance of knowing these situations in order to avoid misinterpretation in reading PET scans needs to be emphasized. In this light, an accurate patient's history and a skilful nuclear medicine physician are very important factors. For the same purpose, it is reasonable to think that the use of hybrid PET/CT tomographs could also play an important role in helping to identify non-tumoural FDG focal uptake.

18F-FDG PET early after radiotherapy in lymphoma patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of postactinic inflammatory alterations that could lead to false-positive results in FDG-PET images, in a group of lymphoma patients studied with positron emission tomography (PET) early after the end of radiation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen (16) consecutive patients were referred to our center for malignant lymphoma; 14 of 16 patients had a mediastinal bulky mass at diagnosis. Each patient underwent chemotherapy and then radiotherapy (RT): for clinical reasons, shortly after RT (range, 25-56 days; mean, 38.7 days) a FDG PET scan was required to evaluate the effect of therapy. We intravenously injected 370 MBq of 18F-FDG, and after 60-90 minutes we recorded images.

RESULTS

Despite a relatively short time after RT, there was no pathological tracer uptake in 13 of 16 patients. In 3 cases, a mild increase in FDG uptake was observed, but no findings which would lead to a false-positive diagnosis. In 2 of 3 cases, postactinic pneumopathy was diagnosed (PET scan performed 51 and 52 days after RT); while in 1 patient, soft-tissue inflammation was present (PET scan performed 42 days after RT).

CONCLUSION

Our data indicates that the rate of postactinic PET inflammatory alterations in lymphoma patients is not very high and appear to be not strictly linked to the elapsed time since the end of RT treatment.

18F-FDG PET in malignant lymphoma: significance of positive findings

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of increased uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in patients with malignant lymphoma (ML) studied by positron emission tomography (PET).

METHODS

A total of 1,120 consecutive scans carried out in 848 patients were reviewed; all patients had a diagnosis of ML [574 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and 274 Hodgkin's disease (HD)] and were studied at completion of therapy, for suspected recurrence or during follow-up. PET was carried out after intravenous injection of 370 MBq of 18F-FDG; images were recorded after 60-90 min. Patients were selected whose reports indicated areas of increased FDG uptake. PET findings were considered positive for lymphomatous localisation when uptake occurred at sites of previous disease, in asymmetrical lymph nodes or in nodes unlikely to be affected by inflammation (mediastinal, except for hilar, and abdominal). PET findings were adjudged negative for neoplastic localisations in the following instances: physiological uptake (urinary, muscular, thymic or gastrointestinal in patients without MALT), symmetrical nodal uptake, uptake in lesions unrelated to lymphoma that had already been identified by other imaging methods at the time of PET scan, uptake at sites atypical for lymphoma, very low uptake and non-focal uptake. PET findings were compared with the results of other diagnostic procedures (including CT and ultrasound), biopsy findings and follow-up data.

RESULTS

Overall, 354 scans (in 256 patients) showed increased FDG uptake (244 scans in NHL and 110 in HD): in 286 cases, FDG uptake was considered pathological and indicative of ML, in 41 cases the findings were described as uncertain or equivocal and in 37 cases, FDG uptake was considered unrelated to ML (in ten scans, concurrent findings of abnormal FDG uptake attributed to ML and uptake assigned to other causes were obtained) . Of the 286 patients with positive PET findings, 274 (95.8%) were found to have residual or recurrent ML (i.e. true positives). Four of the 41 patients with inconclusive findings turned out to have ML, while in 13 patients, pathological processes other than ML could be identified as the cause of FDG uptake. ML was excluded in all patients with findings reported as non-pathological (100% true-negative rate). Therefore, the false-positive rate in our series was about 5%. The main cause of increased FDG uptake mimicking ML was inflammation.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirm that 18F-FDG-PET has very high but not absolute specificity for ML. As already suggested, increased FDG uptake may also be observed in patients without active disease; in most cases, however, non-pathological FDG accumulation is properly identified. Less frequently, inconclusive scans are encountered; these cases are usually caused by inflammation, which subsequently resolves.