Potential of hybrid ¹⁸F-fluorocholine PET/MRI for prostate cancer imaging

Diagnostic Performance of PET/MRI in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Bivariate Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

By performing a systematic review and meta-analysis, the diagnostic value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI in breast lesions, lymph nodes, and distant metastases was assessed, and the merits and demerits of PET/MRI in the application of breast cancer were comprehensively reviewed.

METHODS

Breast cancer-related studies using ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI as a diagnostic tool published before September 12, 2022 were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, log diagnostic odds ratio (LDOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated using Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis in a lesion-based and patient-based manner.

RESULTS

We ultimately included 24 studies (including 1723 patients). Whether on a lesion-based or patient-based analysis, PET/MRI showed superior overall pooled sensitivity (0.95 [95% CI: 0.92-0.98] & 0.93 [95% CI: 0.88-0.98]), specificity (0.94 [95% CI: 0.90-0.97] & 0.94 [95% CI: 0.92-0.97]), LDOR (5.79 [95% CI: 4.95-6.86] & 5.64 [95% CI: 4.58-7.03]) and AUC (0.98 [95% CI: 0.94-0.99] & 0.98[95% CI: 0.92-0.99]) for diagnostic applications in breast cancer. In the specific subgroup analysis, PET/MRI had high pooled sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of breast lesions and distant metastatic lesions and was especially excellent for bone lesions. PET/MRI performed poorly for diagnosing axillary lymph nodes but was better than for lymph nodes at other sites (pooled sensitivity, specificity, LDOR, AUC: 0.86 vs. 0.58, 0.90 vs. 0.82, 4.09 vs. 1.98, 0.89 vs. 0.84).

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI performed excellently in diagnosing breast lesions and distant metastases. It can be applied to the initial diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions, accurate staging of breast cancer patients, and accurate restaging of patients with suspected recurrence.

Fabrication and evaluation of bilateral Helmholtz radiofrequency coil for thermo-stable breast image with reduced artifacts

PURPOSE

The positron emission tomography (PET)-magnetic resonance (MR) system is a newly emerging technique that yields hybrid images with high-resolution anatomical and metabolic information. With PET-MR imaging, a definitive diagnosis of breast abnormalities will be possible with high spatial accuracy and images will be acquired for the optimal fusion of anatomic locations. Therefore, we propose a PET-compatible two-channel breast MR coil with minimal disturbance to image acquisition which can be used for simultaneous PET-MR imaging in patients with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For coil design and construction, the conductor loops of the Helmholtz coil were tuned, matched, and subdivided with nonmagnetic components. Element values were optimized with an electromagnetic field simulation. Images were acquired on a GE 600 PET-computed tomography (CT) and GE 3.0 T MR system. For this study, we used the T1-weighted image (volunteer; repetition time (TR), 694 ms; echo time (TE), 9.6 ms) and T2-weighted image (phantom; TR, 8742 ms; TE, 104 ms) with the fast spin-echo sequence.

RESULTS

The results of measuring image factors with the proposed radiofrequency (RF) coil and standard conventional RF coil were as follows: signal-to-noise ratio (breast; 207.7 vs. 175.2), percent image uniformity (phantom; 89.22%-91.27% vs. 94.63%-94.77%), and Hounsfield units (phantom; -4.51 vs. 2.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study focused on the feasibility of proposed two-channel Helmholtz loops (by minimizing metallic components and soldering) for PET-MR imaging and found the comparable image quality to the standard conventional coil. We believe our work will help significantly to improve image quality with the development of a less metallic breast MR coil.

Molecular Imaging in Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer Patients: Current Aspects and Future Trends

Accurate primary staging is the cornerstone in all malignancies. Different morphological imaging modalities are employed in the evaluation of prostate cancer (PCa). Regardless of all developments in imaging, invasive histopathologic evaluation is still the standard method for the detection and staging of the primary PCa. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) play crucial roles; however, functional imaging provides additional valuable information, and it is gaining ever-growing acceptance in the management of PCa. Targeted imaging with different radiotracers has remarkably evolved in the past two decades. [111In]In-capromab pendetide scintigraphy was a new approach in the management of PCa. Afterwards, positron emission tomography (PET) tracers such as [11C/18F]choline and [11C]acetate were developed. Nevertheless, none found a role in the primary staging. By introduction of the highly sensitive small molecule prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT, as well as recent developments in MRI and hybrid PET/MRI systems, non-invasive staging of PCa is being contemplated. Several studies investigated the role of these sophisticated modalities in the primary staging of PCa, showing promising results. Here, we recapitulate the role of targeted functional imaging. We briefly mention the most popular radiotracers, their diagnostic accuracy in the primary staging of PCa, and impact on patient management.

MRI/PET Imaging in elevated PSA and localized prostate cancer: a narrative review

Objective

To review the recent milestones in MRI and PET based imaging and evaluate their evolving role in the setting of elevated PSA as well as localized prostate cancer.

Background

The importance of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and PET based imaging for the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer cannot be understated. Accurate staging has become another significant milestone with the use of PET scans, particularly with prostate specific radiotracers like 68-Gallium Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (68Ga-PSMA). Integrated PET/MRI systems are commercially available and can be modulated to evaluate the unique needs of localized as well as recurrent prostate cancer.

Methods

A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar using the MeSH compliant and other keywords that included prostate cancer, PSA, mpMRI, PET CT, PET/MRI.

Conclusions

mpMRI has now established itself as the gold-standard of local prostate imaging and has been incorporated into international guidelines as part of the diagnostic work-up of prostate cancer. PSMA PET/CT has shown superiority over conventional imaging even in staging of localized prostate cancer based on recent randomized control data. Imaging parameters from PET/MRI have been shown to be associated with malignancy, Gleason score and tumour volume. As mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT become more ubiquitous and established; we can anticipate more high-quality data, cost optimization and increasing availability of PET/MRI to be ready for primetime in localized prostate cancer.

Diagnostic accuracy of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/MRI and multiparametric MRI in detecting index tumours in radical prostatectomy specimen

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the ⁶⁸ gallium (⁶⁸ Ga) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) by region-based comparison of index tumour localisations using histopathological tumour maps of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy because of clinically significant prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 64 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy after primary staging with mpMRI and ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/MRI. Diagnostic analysis was performed by dividing the prostate into four anatomic regions as left/right anterior and left/right posterior. The extension of the lesions in mpMRI and the pathological uptake in ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/MRI were matched separately for each region with the extension of the index tumour into each region.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and the accuracy of mpMRI and ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/MRI are shown as 55.7%, 91.8%, 80.6%, 77.2%, 78.1%, and 60.8%, 94.3%, 86.8% 79.8%, 83.5%, respectively. ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/MRI has higher sensitivity and specificity compared with mpMRI. However, no statistically significant difference was found (P = .464). Combined imaging had significantly higher diagnostic accuracy compared with mpMRI and ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/MRI (change in AUC: 0.084 and 0.046, P < .001 and P = .028, respectively), while no statistically significant difference was found between mpMRI and ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/MRI (change in AUC: 0.038, P = .246).

CONCLUSION

⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/MRI had higher clinical diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer compared with mpMRI. Diagnostic accuracy was significantly increased in the combined use of both imaging modalities.

18F-choline PET/MRI on initial staging of prostate cancer. Impact on therapy approach

AIM

Evaluate the therapy impact of initial staging in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer by ¹⁸ F-choline PET/MRI hybrid technique.

MATERIAL

A prospective study which included 31 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer; Gleason > 7; mean PSA 13.6 ng/mL (range 6.3-20.6). PET/MRI studies were acquired simultaneously with hybrid equipment (SIGNA.3T, GE) following intravenous injection of 185 ± 18.5MBq of ¹⁸F-choline: - Early/prostate imaging: PET emission + multiparametric MR: DIXON-T1-T2-diffusion-gadolinium. - Late/whole-body imaging: PET emission + MR: DIXON-T1-T2-diffusion-STIR sequences. Images were visually evaluated. SUV & ADC & textures were also calculated. Treatment selection was based upon Oncology Committee consensus decision.

RESULTS

Procedure was well tolerated in all patients, and no artifacts were reported. MRI was superior in T staging in eight patients (25.8%) (Likert: 2-3), whereas PET increased MRI sensitivity in three patients (9.7%) (PIRADS: 3).

PROSTATE LESION LOCATION

Peripheral 91.4%, transitional 8.6%. SUVmax threshold: 2.95: sensitivity 92.9%, specificity 66.7%. No correlation SUV vs. ADC. Better distinction between stage T2 vs. T3 using the DiscrLin model with NG = 16 (AUC 0.7767 ± 0.3386). PET was superior to T2 in textures analysis (0.588 vs. 0.412). Seventeen patients (54.8%) were staged ≥ T3, with surgical treatment being contraindicated. Fifteen patients (48.4%) presented with extra-prostatic disease: 8/31 oligometastatic and 7/31 multiple metastasis. Therapy approach following PET/MRI was: radical treatment in 24/31 patients (77.4%), 14 radical prostatectomy and 10 MRI-guided radiotherapy; systemic treatment in 7/31 patients (22.6%).

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-choline PET/MRI had a complementary role for the T staging, with a high detection rate for NM infiltration. PET/MRI findings allowed patients to be directed either to prostatectomy or MRI-guided radiotherapy, and thus avoiding radicaltreatment in 22.6% of patients.

Clinical PET/MR

Oncologic imaging has been a major focus of clinical research on PET/MR over the last 10 years. Studies so far have shown that PET/MR with ¹⁸F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) overall provides a similar accuracy for tumor staging as FDG PET/CT. The effective radiation dose of whole-body FDG PET/MR is more than 50% lower than for FDG PET/CT, making PET/MR particularly attractive for imaging of children. However, the longer acquisition times and higher costs have so far limited broader clinical use of PET/MR technology for whole-body staging. With the currently available technology, PET/MR appears more promising for locoregional staging of diseases for which MR is the anatomical imaging modality of choice. These include brain tumors, head and neck cancers, gynecologic malignancies, and prostate cancer. For instance, PET imaging with ligands of prostate-specific membrane antigen, combined with multi-parametric MR, appears promising for detection of prostate cancer and differentiation from benign prostate pathologies as well as for detection of local recurrences. The combination of functional parameters from MR, such as apparent diffusion coefficients, and molecular parameters from PET, such as receptor densities or metabolic rates, is feasible in clinical studies, but clinical applications for this multimodal and multi-parametric imaging approach still need to be defined.

PET/MRI in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim

In recent years, the clinical availability of scanners for integrated positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has enabled the practical potential of multimodal, combined metabolic-receptor, anatomical, and functional imaging to be explored. The present systematic review and meta-analysis summarize the diagnostic information provided by PET/MRI in patients with prostate cancer (PCa).

Materials and methods

A literature search was conducted in three different databases. The terms used were “choline” or “prostate-specific membrane antigen - PSMA” AND “prostate cancer” or “prostate” AND “PET/MRI” or “PET MRI” or “PET-MRI” or “positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.” All relevant records identified were combined, and the full texts were retrieved. Reports were excluded if (1) they did not consider hybrid PET/MRI; or (2) the sample size was < 10 patients; or (3) the raw data were not enough to enable the completion of a 2 × 2 contingency table.

Results

Fifty articles were eligible for systematic review, and 23 for meta-analysis. The pooled data concerned 2104 patients. Initial disease staging was the main indication for PET/MRI in 24 studies. Radiolabeled PSMA was the tracer most frequently used. In primary tumors, the pooled sensitivity for the patient-based analysis was 94.9%. At restaging, the pooled detection rate was 80.9% and was higher for radiolabeled PSMA than for choline (81.8% and 77.3%, respectively).

Conclusions

PET/MRI proved highly sensitive in detecting primary PCa, with a high detection rate for recurrent disease, particularly when radiolabeled PSMA was used.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-020-05025-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: restaging performance of 18F-choline hybrid PET/MRI

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a whole-body 18F-choline (FCH) hybrid PET/MRI for prostate cancer patients at biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy (RP) compared to pelvic multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), one of the standard imaging modality for this patient population. From 2010 to 2016, 58 whole-body FCH PET/MRI studies with mpMRI acquisitions were performed in 53 prostate cancer patients relapsing after curative RP. Median PSA and PSA doubling time (PSA DT) at PET study were 1.5 ng/ml and 6.5 months, respectively. The overall positivity rate of FCH PET/MRI was 58.6% (n = 34), dropping to 44% in patients with a PSA ≤ 2 ng/ml (n = 36). Median PSA values in positive and negative PET/MRI studies were 2.2 ng/ml and 0.8 ng/ml, respectively, with no differences in PSA DT (6.5 vs. 6.6 months). A PSA value ≥ 1.5 ng/ml was a significant predictor of positivity on PET/MRI studies. Compared to PET, mpMRI identified more local relapses (17 vs. 14, p = 0.453) while PET outperformed whole-body Dixon MRI for regional (16 vs. 9, p = 0.016) and distant (12 vs. 6, p = 0.031) metastases. Compared to pelvic mpMRI, the treatment approach turned out to be influenced more frequently using whole-body FCH hybrid PET/MRI studies (58.6% vs. 38%). In prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after RP, whole-body FCH PET/MRI achieved a higher detection rate of nodal/distant metastases compared to pelvic mpMRI alone, increasing the change of treatment strategy by more than 20%.

Comparison of PET/MRI with multiparametric MRI in diagnosis of primary prostate cancer: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI using various radiotracers with multiparametric (mp) MRI for detection of primary prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

A systematic literature search up to January 2019 was performed to identify studies that evaluated the diagnostic value of PET/MRI and mpMRI for detection of PCa in the same patient cohorts and had sufficient data to construct 2 × 2 contingency tables for true-positive (TP), false-positive (FP), false-negative (FN), and true-negative (TN) results. The quality of each study was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool, and pooled sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) were calculated. Summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curves (AUCs) were used to compare the performances of PET/MRI and mpMRI.

RESULTS

We identified 9 eligible studies that included a total of 353 patients. PET/MRI had a SEN of 0.783 (95% CI, 0.758-0.807) and a SPE of 0.899 (95% CI, 0.879-0.917), and mpMRI had a SEN of 0.603 (95% CI, 0.574-0.631) and a SPE of 0.887 (95% CI, 0.866-0.906). PET/MRI had a higher AUC than mpMRI (0.9311, 95% CI, 0.8990-0.9632 vs. 0.8403, 95% CI, 0.7864-0.8942; P =  0.0036). There was no notable publication bias, but there was medium heterogeneity in outcomes. The meta-regression analysis showed the major potential cause of heterogeneity was the use of region-based rather than lesion-based analysis.

CONCLUSION

PET/MRI has very good diagnostic performance and outperforms mpMRI for the diagnosis of primary PCa.

Comparison of 18F-Choline PET/CT and MRI functional parameters in prostate cancer

AIM

¹⁸F-Choline (FCH) uptake parameters are strong indicators of aggressive disease in prostate cancer. Functional parameters derived by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are also correlated to aggressive disease. The aim of this work was to evaluate the relationship between metabolic parameters derived by FCH PET/CT and functional parameters derived by MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen patients with proven prostate cancer who underwent FCH PET/CT and multiparametric MRI were enrolled. FCH PET/CT consisted in a dual phase: early pelvic list-mode acquisition and late whole-body acquisition. FCH PET/CT and multiparametric MRI examinations were registered and tumoral volume-of-interest were drawn on the largest lesion visualized on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map and projected onto the different multiparametric MR images and FCH PET/CT images. Concerning the FCH uptake, kinetic parameters were extracted with the best model selected using the Akaike information criterion between the one- and two-tissue compartment models with an imaging-derived plasma input function. Other FCH uptake parameters (early SUVmean and late SUVmean) were extracted. Concerning functional parameters derived by MRI scan, cell density (ADC from diffusion weighting imaging) and vessel permeability (K_trans and V_e using the Tofts pharmakinetic model from dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging) parameters were extracted. Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated to compare parameters.

RESULTS

The one-tissue compartment model for kinetic analysis of PET images was selected. Concerning correlation analysis between PET parameters, K₁ was highly correlated with early SUVmean (r = 0.83, p < 0.001) and moderately correlated with late SUVmean (r = 0.66, p = 0.010) and early SUVmean was highly correlated with late SUVmean (r = 0.90, p < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between functional MRI parameters. Concerning correlation analysis between PET and functional MRI parameters, K₁ (from FCH PET/CT imaging) was moderately correlated with K_trans (from perfusion MR imaging) (r = 0.55, p = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant correlation was found between FCH PET/CT and multiparametric MRI metrics except FCH influx which is moderately linked to the vessel permeability in prostate cancer.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET Imaging in Prostate Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges

The aim of this systematic review was to describe the characteristics of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting PET and their clinical applications in prostate cancer patients. There have been major strides in the design, synthesis of PSMA-targeting PET tracers over the past several years. PSMA-targeting PET tracers can be categorized, according to positron emitters and targeting strategies for the PSMA. The majority of PSMA PET studies has been focused on patients with biochemical recurrence, but additional values of PSMA PET have also been investigated for use in primary staging, treatment planning, response evaluation, and PSMA radioligand therapy. PSMA PET is expected to bring improvements in the management of patients, but the impact of improved diagnosis by PSMA on overall survival remains unanswered. Many challenges still await PSMA PET to expedite the use in the clinical practice. At this early stage, prospective multicenter trials are needed to validate the effectiveness and usefulness of PSMA PET.

Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification accuracy and lesion detection in simultaneous 18F-choline PET/MRI for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Accurate attenuation correction (AC) is an inherent problem of positron emission tomography magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) systems. Simulation studies showed that time-of-flight (TOF) detectors can reduce PET quantification errors in MRI-based AC. However, its impact on lesion detection in a clinical setting with 18F-choline has not yet been evaluated. Therefore, we compared TOF and non-TOF 18F-choline PET for absolute and relative difference in standard uptake values (SUV) and investigated the detection rate of metastases in prostate cancer patients.

RESULTS

Non-TOF SUV was significantly lower compared to TOF in all osseous structures, except the skull, in primary lesions of the prostate, and in pelvic nodal and osseous metastasis. Concerning lymph node metastases, both experienced readers detected 16/19 (84%) on TOF PET, whereas on non-TOF PET readers 1 and 2 detected 11 (58%), and 14 (73%), respectively. With TOF PET readers 1 and 2 detected 14/15 (93%) and 11/15 (73%) bone metastases, respectively, whereas detection rate with non-TOF PET was 73% (11/15) for reader 1 and 53% (8/15) for reader 2. The interreader agreement was good for osseous metastasis detection on TOF (kappa 0.636, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.453-0.810) and moderate on non-TOF (kappa = 0.600, CI 0.438-0.780).

CONCLUSION

TOF reconstruction for 18F-choline PET/MRI shows higher SUV measurements compared to non-TOF reconstructions in physiological osseous structures as well as pelvic malignancies. Our results suggest that addition of TOF information has a positive impact on lesion detection rate for lymph node and bone metastasis in prostate cancer patients.

Comparison of choline influx from dynamic 18F-Choline PET/CT and clinicopathological parameters in prostate cancer initial assessment

AIM

The aim of the study was to compare the kinetic analysis of ¹⁸F-labeled choline (FCH) uptake with static analysis and clinicopathological parameters in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-one patients were included. PSA was performed few days before FCH PET/CT. Gleason scoring (GS) was collected from systematic sextant biopsies. FCH PET/CT consisted in a dual phase: early pelvic list-mode acquisition (from 0 to10 min post-injection) and late whole-body acquisition (60 min post-injection). PC volume of interest was drawn using an adaptative thresholding (40% of the maximal uptake) on the late acquisition and projected onto an early static frame of 10 min and each of the 20 reconstructed frames of 30 s. Kinetic analysis was performed using an imaging-derived plasma input function. Early kinetic parameter (K1 as influx) and static parameters (early SUVmean, late SUVmean, and retention index) were extracted and compared to clinicopathological parameters.

RESULTS

K1 was significantly, but moderately correlated with early SUVmean (r = 0.57, p < 0.001) and late SUVmean (r = 0.43, p < 0.001). K1, early SUVmean, and late SUVmean were moderately correlated with PSA level (respectively, r = 0.36, p = 0.004; r = 0.67, p < 0.001; r = 0.51, p < 0.001). Concerning GS, K1 was higher for patients with GS ≥ 4 + 3 than for patients with GS < 4 + 3 (median value 0.409 vs 0.272 min^- 1, p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed for static parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

FCH influx index K1 seems to be related to GS and could be a non-invasive tool to gain further information concerning tumor aggressiveness.

Staging performance of whole-body DWI, PET/CT and PET/MRI in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (WB-DWI), whole-body positron emission tomography with computed tomography (WB-PET/CT), and whole-body positron emission tomography with magnetic resonance imaging (WB-PET/MRI) in staging patients with untreated invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Fifty-one women with newly diagnosed invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast underwent WB-DWI, WB-PET/CT and WB-PET/MRI before treatment. A radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician reviewed in consensus the images from the three modalities and searched for occurrence, number and location of metastases. Final staging, according to each technique, was compared. Pathology and imaging follow-up were used as the reference. WB-DWI, WB-PET/CT and WB-PET/MRI correctly and concordantly staged 33/51 patients: stage IIA in 7 patients, stage IIB in 8 patients, stage IIIC in 4 patients and stage IV in 14 patients. WB-DWI, WB-PET/CT and WB-PET/MRI incorrectly and concordantly staged 1/51 patient as stage IV instead of IIIA. Discordant staging was reported in 17/51 patients. WB-PET/MRI resulted in improved staging when compared to WB-PET/CT (50 correctly staged on WB-PET/MRI vs. 38 correctly staged on WB-PET/CT; McNemar's test; p<0.01). Comparing the performance of WB-PET/MRI and WB-DWI (43 correct) did not reveal a statistically significant difference (McNemar test, p=0.14). WB-PET/MRI is more accurate in the initial staging of breast cancer than WB-DWI and WB-PET/CT, however, the discrepancies between WB-PET/MRI and WB-DWI were not statistically significant. When available, WB-PET/MRI should be considered for staging patient with invasive ductal breast carcinoma.

Diagnostic value of integrated PET/MRI for detection and localization of prostate cancer: Comparative study of multiparametric MRI and PET/CT

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic value of integrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) compared with conventional multiparametric MRI and PET/computed tomography (CT) for the detailed and accurate segmental detection/localization of prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients who underwent integrated PET/MRI using ¹⁸ F-choline and ¹⁸ F-FDG with an integrated PET/MRI scanner followed by radical prostatectomy were included. The prostate was divided into six segments (sextants) according to anatomical landmarks. Three radiologists noted the presence and location of cancer in each sextant on four different image interpretation modalities in consensus (1, multiparametric MRI; 2, integrated ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/MRI; 3, integrated ¹⁸ F-choline PET/MRI; and 4, combined interpretation of 1 and ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic performance based on the DOR (diagnostic odds ratio) and NNM (number needed to misdiagnose) were evaluated for each interpretation modality, using the pathologic result as the reference standard. Detection rates of seminal vesicle invasion and extracapsular invasion were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Integrated ¹⁸ F-choline PET/MRI showed significantly higher sensitivity than did multiparametric MRI alone in high Gleason score patients (77.0% and 66.2%, P = 0.011), low Gleason score patients (66.7% and 47.4%, P = 0.007), and total patients (72.5% and 58.0%, P = 0.008) groups. Integrated ¹⁸ F-choline PET/MRI and ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/MRI showed similar sensitivity and specificity to combined interpretation of multiparametric MRI and ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT (for sensitivity, 58.0%, 63.4%, 72.5%, and 68.7%, respectively, and for specificity, 87.3%, 80.0%, 81.8%, 72.7%, respectively, in total patient group). However, integrated ¹⁸ F-choline PET/MRI showed the best diagnostic performance (as DOR, 11.875 in total patients, 27.941 in high Gleason score patients, 5.714 in low Gleason score groups) among the imaging modalities, regardless of Gleason score. Integrated ¹⁸ F-choline PET/MRI showed higher sensitivity and diagnostic performance than did integrated ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/MRI (as DOR, 6.917 in total patients, 15.143 in high Gleason score patients, 3.175 in low Gleason score groups) in all three patient groups.

CONCLUSION

Integrated PET/MRI carried out using a dedicated integrated PET/MRI scanner provides better sensitivity, accuracy, and diagnostic value for detection/localization of prostate cancer compared to multiparametric MRI. Generally, integrated ¹⁸ F-choline PET/MRI shows better sensitivity, accuracy, and diagnostic performance than does integrated ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/MRI as well as combined interpretation of multiparametric MRI with ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:597-609.

PET/MRI: A luxury or a necessity?

PET/MRI is a new multimodality technique with a promising future in diagnostic imaging. Technical limitations are being overcome. Interference between the two systems (PET and MRI) seems to have been resolved. MRI-based PET attenuation correction can be performed safely. Scan time is acceptable and the study is tolerable, with claustrophobia prevalence similar to that of MRI. Quantification with common parameters, such as Standardized Uptake Value (SUV), shows a fairly good correlation between both systems. However, PET/CT currently provides better results in scan time, scan costs, and patient comfort. Less patient radiation exposure is a big advantage of PET/MRI over PET/CT, which makes it particularly recommended in paediatric and adolescent patients requiring one or more studies. PET/MRI indications are the same as those of PET/CT, given that in cases where MRI is superior to CT, PET/MRI is superior to PET/CT. This superiority is clear in many soft tissue tumours. Moreover, it is common to perform both PET/CT and MRI in neurological diseases, as well as in some tumours, such as breast cancer. A single PET/MRI study replaces both with obvious benefit. MRI also allows other MRI-based PET corrections, such as motion or partial volume effect corrections. The better spatial resolution of MRI allows the transfer of well-defined MRI areas or small volumes of interest to PET image, in order to measure PET biomarkers in these areas. The richness of information of both techniques opens up immense possibilities of synergistic correlation between them.

Target Definition in Salvage Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer: The Role of Advanced Molecular Imaging

Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) represents the main treatment option for relapsing prostate cancer in patients after radical prostatectomy. Several open questions remain unanswered in terms of target volumes definition and delivered doses for SRT: the effective dose necessary to achieve biochemical control in the SRT setting may be different if the tumor recurrence is micro- or macroscopic. At the same time, irradiation of only the prostatic bed or of the whole pelvis will depend on the localization of the recurrence, local or locoregional. In the “theragnostic imaging” era, molecular imaging using positron emission tomography (PET) constitutes a useful tool for clinicians to define the site of the recurrence, the extent of disease, and individualize salvage treatments. The best option currently available in clinical routine is the combination of radiolabeled choline PET imaging and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), associating the nodal and distant metastases identification based on PET with the local assessment by MRI. A new generation of targeted tracers, namely, prostate-specific membrane antigen, show promising results, with a contrast superior to choline imaging and a higher detection rate even for low prostate-specific antigen levels; validation studies are ongoing. Finally, imaging targeting bone remodeling, using whole-body SPECT–CT, is a relevant complement to molecular/metabolic PET imaging when bone involvement is suspected.

Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer is the most common noncutaneous malignancy among men in the Western world. The natural history and clinical course of prostate cancer are markedly diverse, ranging from small indolent intraprostatic lesions to highly aggressive disseminated disease. An understanding of this biologic heterogeneity is considered a necessary requisite in the quest for the adoption of precise and personalized management strategies. Molecular imaging offers the potential for noninvasive assessment of the biologic interactions underpinning prostate carcinogenesis. Currently, numerous molecular imaging probes are in clinical use or undergoing preclinical or clinical evaluation. These probes can be divided into those that image increased cell metabolism, those that target prostate cancer-specific membrane proteins and receptor molecules, and those that bind to the bone matrix adjacent to metastases to bone. The increased metabolism and vascular changes in prostate cancer cells can be evaluated with radiolabeled analogs of choline, acetate, glucose, amino acids, and nucleotides. The androgen receptor, prostate-specific membrane antigen, and gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (ie, bombesin) are overexpressed in prostate cancer and can be targeted by specific radiolabeled imaging probes. Because metastatic prostate cancer cells induce osteoblastic signaling pathways of adjacent bone tissue, bone-seeking radiotracers are sensitive tools for the detection of metastases to bone. Knowledge about the underlying biologic processes responsible for the phenotypes associated with the different stages of prostate cancer allows an appropriate choice of methods and helps avoid pitfalls.

Current Status of Hybrid PET/MRI in Oncologic Imaging

OBJECTIVE

This review article explores recent advancements in PET/MRI for clinical oncologic imaging.

CONCLUSION

Radiologists should understand the technical considerations that have made PET/MRI feasible within clinical workflows, the role of PET tracers for imaging various molecular targets in oncology, and advantages of hybrid PET/MRI compared with PET/CT. To facilitate this understanding, we discuss clinical examples (including gliomas, breast cancer, bone metastases, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, gynecologic malignancy, and lymphoma) as well as future directions, challenges, and areas for continued technical optimization for PET/MRI.

Initial prostate cancer diagnosis and disease staging--the role of choline-PET-CT

An early and correct diagnosis together with accurate staging of prostate cancer is necessary in order to plan the most appropriate treatment strategy. Morphological imaging modalities such as transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), CT, and MRI can have some limitations regarding their accuracy for primary diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer; for instance, they have limited specificity in differentiating cancer from benign prostatic conditions and, by using size as the only criterion to characterize lymph node metastases, they might not be accurate enough for tumour characterization. In this scenario, PET-CT with (11)C-labelled or (18)F-labelled choline derivatives provides morphological and functional characterization and could overcome the limitations of the conventional imaging techniques. PET-CT is one of the most investigated molecular imaging modalities for prostate cancer diagnosis and staging. Currently, the main investigations on the role of PET-CT in the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer have been performed on a retrospective basis and this type of analysis might be one of the main reasons why different results regarding its diagnostic accuracy have been reported.

PET/MRI in Oncological Imaging: State of the Art

Positron emission tomography (PET) combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a hybrid technology which has recently gained interest as a potential cancer imaging tool. Compared with CT, MRI is advantageous due to its lack of ionizing radiation, superior soft-tissue contrast resolution, and wider range of acquisition sequences. Several studies have shown PET/MRI to be equivalent to PET/CT in most oncological applications, possibly superior in certain body parts, e.g., head and neck, pelvis, and in certain situations, e.g., cancer recurrence. This review will update the readers on recent advances in PET/MRI technology and review key literature, while highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of PET/MRI in cancer imaging.

Imaging biomarkers in prostate cancer: role of PET/CT and MRI

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is currently the most widely used biomarker of prostate cancer (PCa). PSA suggests the presence of primary tumour and disease relapse after treatment, but it is not able to provide a clear distinction between locoregional and distant disease. Molecular and functional imaging, that are able to provide a detailed and comprehensive overview of PCa extension, are more reliable tools for primary tumour detection and disease extension assessment both in staging and restaging. In the present review we evaluate the role of PET/CT and MRI in the diagnosis, staging and restaging of PCa, and the use of these imaging modalities in prognosis, treatment planning and response assessment. Innovative imaging strategies including new radiotracers and hybrid scanners such as PET/MRI are also discussed.

Molecular research in urology 2014: update on PET/MR imaging of the prostate

This article gives an overview of recent publications and potential indications of Positron emission tomography/ Magnetic resonance (PET/MR) imaging of prostate cancer.