The predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for assessing pathological response and survival in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy

Role of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in Evaluation of Tumor Response to Chemoradiation Therapy for Advanced Colorectal Cancer

Objectives

The objective is to evaluate the efficacy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of tumor response to preoperative/palliative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for advanced colorectal cancer; including metastatic cancer at primary presentation and recurrent cancers with local and/or distant metastasis.

Materials and Methods

Fifty patients with advanced rectal cancer underwent two point imaging with 18 FDG PET-CT before and after 3 weeks of completion of preoperative/palliative CRT in between 2016 and 2022. Patients with locally recurrent cancer also underwent radical surgery. The assessment consisted of the evaluation of the following metabolic PET parameters: Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVratio, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Response was assessed among the followed patients using RECIST 1.1 criteria.

Observations and Results

There was a significant decline in the mean post therapy SUVmax and SUVratio as compared to baseline (P = 0.0001). Twenty-six out of 50 (52%) patients were classified as responders. A significant decrease in all parameters (SUVmax, SUVratio, TLG, and MTV) from baseline was observed in responders of the study when comparing with nonresponders (P < 0.05). Besides SUVmax and SUVratio, the mean posttherapy TLG was significantly reduced in responders than nonresponders (P = 0.0065).

Conclusion

PET-CT is a useful combined anatomic and functional imaging modality in monitoring tumor response to preoperative/palliative CRT in advanced rectal cancer, whether primary or recurrent, including metastatic cancers at presentation. Posttherapy SUV and TLG in particular are significantly associated with treatment response.

MRI VS. FDG-PET for diagnosis of response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Aim

In this study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic values of MRI and FDG-PET for the prediction of the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACT) of patients with locally advanced Rectal cancer (RC).

Methods

Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library, were systematically searched through December 2021 for studies that investigated the diagnostic value of MRI and FDG-PET in the prediction of the response of patients with locally advanced RC to NACT. The quality of the included studies was assessed using QUADAS. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR and NLR), and the area under the ROC (AUC) of MRI and FDG-PET were calculated using a bivariate generalized linear mixed model, random-effects model, and hierarchical regression.

Results

A total number of 74 studies with recruited 4,105 locally advanced RC patients were included in this analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and AUC for MRI were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.88), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.89), 5.50 (95% CI: 4.11-7.35), 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14-0.27), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93), respectively. The summary sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and AUC for FDG-PET were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.85), 0.75 (95% CI: 0.70-0.80), 3.29 (95% CI: 2.64-4.10), 0.25 (95% CI: 0.20-0.31), and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.88), respectively. Moreover, there were no significant differences between MRI and FDG-PET in sensitivity (P = 0.565), and NLR (P = 0.268), while the specificity (P = 0.006), PLR (P = 0.006), and AUC (P = 0.003) of MRI was higher than FDG-PET.

Conclusions

MRI might superior than FGD-PET for the prediction of the response of patients with locally advanced RC to NACT.

The reduction of 18F-FDG uptake ability of tumor tissue after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer can effectively reflect the degree of tumor regression

Introduction

To evaluate the predictive value of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT) imaging parameters for the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

Methods

From January 2016 to March 2020, 52 LARC patients who underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT scans within 1 week before and 8-9 weeks after nCRT, were enrolled in this study according to a pre-designed screening criteria. After total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery, we assessed tumor response to treatment and analyzed the correlation between imaging parameters obtained from two PET-CT scans and tumor regression status.

Results

Tumor response assessment showed that 13 of 52 patients received good response (GR), including 9 cases with pathological complete regression (pCR) and 4 cases with near-pathological complete regression (near-pCR). We also found that the maximum standard uptake value after nCRT (post-SUVmax), the response index (RI), the mean standard uptake values after nCRT (post-SUVmean), and the ratio of tumor SUVmean to liver SUVmean after nCRT (post-Ratio), were correlated with GR and pCR. Among these parameters, post-SUVmax and RI had a near-strong correlation with pCR (r_s= -0.58 and 0.59, respectively), and also had a strong correlation with GR (r_s = -0.7 and 0.63, respectively). Further ROC analysis showed that post-SUVmax and RI had higher values in predicting whether patients could achieve GR and pCR after nCRT, and the area under the curve (AUC) of both were greater than 0.9. The positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs) of post-SUVmax for GR were 80.01% and 97.3%, and for pCR were 66.68% and 97.5%, respectively. The PPVs and NPVs of the RI values for GR were 84.61% and 94.87%, and for pCR were 69.24% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion

For LARC patients, the analysis of imaging parameters such as post-SUVmax and RI, which can reflect the changes of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake capacity of tumor tissues before and after nCRT, is of great value for predicting the response of patients to neoadjuvant therapy and guiding the selection of subsequent treatment strategies.

Pretreatment blood biomarkers combined with magnetic resonance imaging predict responses to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

Aim

To investigate the value of pretreatment blood biomarkers combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

Methods

This study involved patients with LARC who received NCRT and subsequently underwent total mesenteric excision from June 2015 to June 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. Patients with incomplete courses of neoadjuvant therapy, comorbidities with other malignancies or diseases that affect the study outcome, and those who underwent unplanned surgery were ultimately excluded. Laboratory data such as albumin, CEA, various blood cell levels, and MRI related data such as tumor regression grade assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (mrTRG) were collected from the included patients one week prior to NCRT. MrTRG is a common clinical imaging metric used to assess the degree of tumor regression in rectal cancer, primarily based on morphological assessment of residual tumor. Furthermore, pretreatment blood biomarkers such as neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), albumin to fibrinogen ratio (AFR), and prealbumin to fibrinogen ratio (PFR) were assessed. The independent variables for pathologic complete response (pCR) to NCRT were determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to examine the performance of MRI with or without pretreatment blood biomarkers in predicting pCR using DeLong’s method. A nomogram was created and confirmed internally.

Results

Fifty-nine individuals with LARC satisfied the inclusion criteria, among which 23 showed pCR after NCRT. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that pretreatment CEA (≤ 3 µg/L, OR = 0.151, P = 0.039), NLR (OR = 4.205, P = 0.027), LMR (OR = 0.447, P = 0.034), and PFR (OR = 0.940, P = 0.013) were independent predictors of pCR to NCRT. The AUCs of mrTRG alone and mrTRG plus the above four pretreatment blood biomarkers were 0.721 (P =0.0003) and 0.913 (P <0.0001), respectively. The constructed nomogram showed a C-index of 0.914.

Conclusion

Pretreatment blood biomarkers combined with MRI can help clinical efforts by better predicting the efficacy of NCRT in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Metabolic positron emission tomography/CT response after induction chemotherapy and chemo(re)irradiation is associated with higher negative resection margin rate in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer

AIM

Positron emission tomography (PET)/CT can be used to monitor the metabolic changes that occur after intensified treatment with induction chemotherapy and chemo(re)irradiation for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). This study aimed to analyse the correlation between the PET/CT response and final histopathological outcomes.

METHODS

All LRRC patients who underwent induction chemotherapy prior to surgery between January 2010 and July 2020 and were monitored with pretreatment and post-treatment PET/CT were included. Visual qualitative analysis was performed, and patients were scored as having achieved a complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response (PMR) or no response (NR). The histopathological response was assessed according to the Mandard tumour regression (TRG) score and categorized as major (TRG 1-2), partial (TRG 3) or poor (TRG 4-5). The PET/CT and TRG categories were compared, and possible confounders were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients were eligible for analysis; 24 (23%) had a CMR, 54 (51%) had a PMR and 28 (26%) had NR. PET/CT response was a significant predictor of the negative resection margin rate, achieving 96% for CMR, 69% for PMR and 50% for NR. The overall accuracy between PET score and pathological TRG was 45%, and the positive predictive value for CMR was 63%. A longer interval between post-treatment PET/CT and surgery negatively influenced the predictive value.

CONCLUSION

Metabolic PET/CT response evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment proves to be a complementary diagnostic tool to standard MRI in assessing tumour response, and may play a role for treatment planning in LRRC patients.

[Complete response after neoadjuvant therapy: how certain is radiology?]

The concept of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) means a paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with rectal cancer. In cases in which the TNT induced a complete clinical response (cCR), an organ preserving watch and wait therapy concept can now be provided more often; however, this increases the demand for imaging for the determination of cCR and in the subsequent follow-up. In this article, the performance of radiology in these scenarios will be evaluated and discussed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the current standard for local assessment of the rectum with a high sensitivity for diagnosis and staging of rectal cancer, residual tumor and tumor recurrence. However, the certain exclusion of residual malignant tissue is still difficult, in particular the differentiation of residual scar tissue from vital residual tumor is only possible with low specificity and a moderate negative predictive value (NPV). The currently discussed criteria for the assessment of imaging have not yet been validated in large cohorts and are frequently subjective. An improvement of the diagnostic accuracy for identification of cCR in patients after TNT and for monitoring patients in watch and wait treatment concepts can certainly be achieved by the integration of MRI, endoscopy and endosonography as well as clinical parameters. This should enable for identification of patients with an incomplete response or local recurrence, in time for extended treatment to be initiated without relevant impact on the patient outcome.

The role of MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT with respect to evaluation of pathological response in the rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in determining the correct stage and predicting the pathological response.

METHODS

Seventy one patients with pathologic proven rectal adenocarcinoma, clinical stage IIA-IVA, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were evaluated retrospectively. Radiotherapy was delivered 45-50 Gy in 25 fractions with concomitant oral capecitabine. Pelvic MRI, colonoscopy, and 18F-FDG PET-CT were performed before the neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). After NAT, MRI and PET-CT were performed for re-evaluation.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 25 months (range: 3-57 months). Of the 71 patients who underwent NAT, 57 patients underwent surgery. Downstaging was recorded in 48 (84.2%) of 57 patients who underwent surgery. There was no statistically significant difference between both MRI and PET-CT with pathology results in terms of response evaluation. As a result of the comparison of MRI and PET-CT with pathological results; sensitivity and specificity were 91.6% (44/48) and 22.2% (2/9) for MRI, and 100% (47/47) and 12.5% (1/8) for PET-CT, respectively.

CONCLUSION

PET-CT and MRI are effective in predicting response to NAT and predictive for the pathological response. A more accurate response can be judged when both PET-CT and MRI are executed together in restaging after NAT.

Role of 18F-PET-CT to predict pathological response after neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) is universally considered to be a valid treatment to achieve downstaging, to improve local disease control and to obtain better resectability in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The aim of this study is to correlate the change in the tumour 18F-FDG PET-CT standardized uptake value (SUV) before and after nCRT, in order to obtain an early prediction of the pathologic response (pR) achieved in patients with LARC.

DATA DESCRIPTION

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with LARC diagnosis who underwent curative resection. All patients underwent a baseline 18F-FDG PET-CT scan within the week prior to the initiation of the treatment (PET-CT SUV1) and a second scan (PET-CT SUV2) within 6 weeks of the completion of nCRT. We evaluated the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET-CT in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with LARC.A total of 133 patients with LARC were included in the study. Patients were divided in two groups according to the TRG (tumour regression grade): 107 (80%) as the responders group (TRG0-TRG1) and 26 (25%) as the no-responders group (TRG2-TRG3). We obtained a significant difference in Δ%SUV between the two different groups; responders versus no-responders (p < 0.012). The results of this analysis show that 18F-FDG PET-CT may be an indicator to evaluate the pR to nCRT in patients with LARC. The decrease in 18F-FDG PET-CT uptake in the primary tumour may offer important information in order for an early identification of those patients more likely to obtain a pCR to nCRT and to predict those who are unlikely to significantly regress.

PET/CT-Based Response Evaluation in Cancer-a Systematic Review of Design Issues

Positron emission tomography/x-ray computed tomography (PET/CT) has long been discussed as a promising modality for response evaluation in cancer. When designing respective clinical trials, several design issues have to be addressed, especially the number/timing of PET/CT scans, the approach for quantifying metabolic activity, and the final translation of measurements into a rule. It is unclear how well these issues have been tackled in quest of an optimised use of PET/CT in response evaluation. Medline via Ovid and Science Citation Index via Web of Science were systematically searched for articles from 2015 on cancer patients scanned with PET/CT before and during/after treatment. Reports were categorised as being either developmental or evaluative, i.e. focusing on either the establishment or the evaluation of a rule discriminating responders from non-responders. Of 124 included papers, 112 (90 %) were accuracy and/or prognostic studies; the remainder were response-curve studies. No randomised controlled trials were found. Most studies were prospective (62 %) and from single centres (85 %); median number of patients was 38.5 (range 5-354). Most (69 %) of the studies employed only one post-baseline scan. Quantification was mainly based on SUVmax (91 %), while change over time was most frequently used to combine measurements into a rule (79 %). Half of the reports were categorised as developmental, the other half evaluative. Most development studies assessed only one element (35/62, 56 %), most frequently the choice of cut-off points (25/62, 40 %). In summary, the majority of studies did not address the essential open issues in establishing PET/CT for response evaluation. Reasonably sized multicentre studies are needed to systematically compare the many different options when using PET/CT for response evaluation.

Is It Time to Introduce PET/CT in Rectal Cancer Guidelines?

At the moment, international guidelines for rectal cancer suggest to consider F-FDG PET/CT scan in a few conditions: (1) at disease presentation in case of suspected or proven metastatic synchronous adenocarcinoma with potentially curable M1 disease; (2) in the recurrence workup for serial carcinoembryonic antigen level elevation; (3) in the recurrence workup with metachronous metastases documented by CT, MRI, or biopsy; (4) in case of strong contraindication to IV contrast agent administration; and (5) to evaluate an equivocal finding on a contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. PET/CT is not indicated in the follow-up or surveillance of rectal cancer. On the other hand, an attentive evaluation of the literature shows that PET/CT may also be used in some circumstances with significant levels of diagnostic accuracy. This review article aims to emphasize differences between current international guidelines and scientific literature in the role of PET/CT in rectal cancer.

Assessing tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in rectal cancer with rectoscopy and 18F-FDG PET/CT: results from a prospective series

INTRODUCTION

rectoscopy and 18F-FDG PET/CT as a diagnostic algorithm for the assessment of tumor response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is very useful.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

this was a prospective longitudinal study in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant CRT. Patients were assessed after CRT completion with a digital rectal examination, proctoscopy and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Patients were subdivided as clinical (cCR) or radiologic (rCR) responders and non-responders according to tumor response. Clinical and radiological re-assessment was compared with the surgical specimen. Pathological tumor regression (pCR) grade was determined according to Mandard's classification. Of the 68 patients included, 15 (22 %) presented pCR in the surgical specimen and tumor persistence (non-PCR) was detected in the remaining 53 (78 %). Clinical assessment (DRE+ rectoscopy) identified 15 patients as cCR and 53 as non-cCR, two were false positives and two were false negatives. The overall accuracy was 94 %. 18F-FDG PET/CT identified 18 patients as rCR and 50 as non-rCR, one was a false positive and four were false negatives. The overall accuracy was 92 %. A combination of clinical findings and 18F-FDG PET/CT resulted in an accuracy of 96 %. The combination of clinical findings + 18F-FDG PET/CT was able to correctly identify all cases of pCR, with the exception of one case that presented a tumor regression of 80 %. In this series, 18F-PET-CT and clinical assessment had excellent accuracies in differentiating PCR from non-PCR after CRT completion. PET-CT combined with clinical assessment had a better accuracy than both modalities independently. 18F-FDG PET/CT is a valid tool that complements the clinical assessment of tumor response.

The Impact of Primary Tumor and Locoregional Metastatic Lymph Node SUVmax on Predicting Survival in Patients with Rectal Cancer

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of maximum standard uptake value (SUV_max) of the primary tumor and locoregional metastatic lymph node in predicting survival in patients with the preoperative rectal adenocarcinoma.

Methods:

One hundred and fifteen patients [mean age ± standard deviation (SD): 58.7±11.4 years] with biopsy-proven rectal adenocarcinoma underwent ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging for the staging were included in this study. All patients were followed-up for a minimum of 12 months (mean ± SD: 29.7±13.5 months). Tumor-node-metastasis 2017 clinical staging, SUV_max of the primary rectal tumor and locoregional lymph nodes on the PET/CT studies were evaluated.

Results:

All patients had increased FDG activity of the primary tumor. The mean ± SD SUV_max of the primary tumor and locoregional metastatic lymph node were 21.0±9.1 and 4.6±2.8, respectively. Primary tumor SUV_max did not have an effect on predicting survival (p=0.525) however locoregional metastatic lymph node SUV_max had an effect (p<0.05) on predicting survival. Clinical stage of the disease was a factor predicting survival (p<0.001).

Conclusion:

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is an effective imaging modality for detecting primary tumors and metastases in rectal adenocarcinoma and clinical stage assessment with PET/CT had an effect on predicting survival. Furthermore, in our study locoregional lymph node SUV_maks was defined as a factor in predicting survival.

Carcinoembryonic Antigen Improves the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Prediction of Pathologic Response after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Patients with Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in improving the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the prediction of pathologic response after the neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) for patients with rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 524 rectal cancer patients who underwent NCRT and total mesorectal excision between January 2009 and December 2014. The performances of MRI with or without CEA parameters (initial CEA and CEA dynamics) for prediction of pathologic tumor response grade (pTRG) were compared by receiver-operating characteristic analysis with DeLong's method. Cox regression was used to identify the independent factors associated to pTRG and disease-free survival (DFS) after NCRT.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 64.0 months (range, 3.0 to 113.0 months). On multivariate analysis, poor tumor regression grade on MRI (mrTRG; p < 0.001), initial CEA (p < 0.001) and the mesorectal fascia involvement on MRI before NCRT (mrMFI; p=0.054) showed association with poor pTRG. The mrTRG plus CEA parameters showed significantly improved performances in the prediction of pTRG than mrTRG alone. All of mrTRG, mrMFI, and initial CEA were also identified as independent factors associated with DFS. The initial CEA further discriminated DFS in the subgroups with good mrTRG or that without mrMFI.

CONCLUSION

The CEA parameters significantly improved the performance of MRI in the prediction of pTRG after NCRT for patients with rectal cancer. The DFS was further discriminated by initial CEA level in the groups with favorable MRI parameters.

18F-FDG PET/CT Is an Early Predictor of Pathologic Tumor Response and Survival After Preoperative Radiochemotherapy with Bevacizumab in High-Risk Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

There is an unmet need for predictive biomarkers of the clinical benefit of antiangiogenic drugs. The aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT performed during and after preoperative chemoradiotherapy with bevacizumab for the prediction of complete pathologic tumor regression and survival in patients with MRI-defined high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: Sixty-one patients treated in a nonrandomized phase II study (BRANCH) with concomitant or sequential (4 d before chemoradiotherapy) administration of bevacizumab with preoperative chemoradiotherapy were included. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was performed at baseline, 11 d after the beginning of chemoradiotherapy (early), and before surgery (late). Metabolic changes were compared with pathologic complete tumor regression (TRG1) versus incomplete tumor regression (TRG2-TRG5), progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival. Receiver-operating-characteristic curves were calculated for those ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT parameters that significantly correlated with TRG1. Results: Early total-lesion glycolysis and its percentage change compared with baseline (ΔTLG-early) could discriminate TRG1 from TRG2-TRG5. Only receiver-operating-characteristic analysis of ΔTLG-early showed an area under the curve greater than 0.7 (0.76), with an optimal cutoff at 59.5% (80% sensitivity, 71.4% specificity), for identifying TRG1. Late metabolic assessment could not discriminate between the 2 groups. After a median follow-up of 98 mo (range, 77-132 mo), metabolic responders (ΔTLG-early ≥ 59.5%) demonstrated a significantly higher 10-y progression-free survival (89.3% vs. 63.6%, P = 0.02) and cancer-specific survival (92.9% vs. 72.6%, P = 0.04) than incomplete metabolic responders. Conclusion: Our results suggest that early metabolic response can act as a surrogate marker of the benefit of antiangiogenic therapy. The findings provide further support for the use of early ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT evaluation to predict pathologic response and survival in the preoperative treatment of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. ΔTLG-early showed the best accuracy in predicting tumor regression and may be particularly useful in guiding treatment-modifying decisions during preoperative chemoradiotherapy based on expected response.

Does baseline [18F] FDG-PET/CT correlate with tumor staging, response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and prognosis in patients with rectal cancer?

BACKGROUND

[18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F] FDG-PET/CT) may be used for tumor staging and prognosis in several tumors but its role in rectal cancer is still debated. The aim of the present study was to assess the correlation of baseline [18F] FDG-PET parameters with tumor staging, tumor response (tumor regression grade (TRG)), and outcome in a series of patients affected by locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

One hundred patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT and radical surgery were enrolled in the present study. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) at the baseline [18F] FDG-PET were calculated. These PET parameters were correlated with tumor staging, histopathological data (TRG1 vs. TRG2-5 and TRG1-2 vs. TRG3-5), disease-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

SUVmax and SUVmean of primary tumor were statistically associated with T4-stage. SUVmax, SUVmean, and TLG did not result statistically associated with TRG (TRG1 or TRG1-2). MTV resulted statistically associated with TRG1-2 group (OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.2-7.1). Finally, no PET parameter was significantly associated with disease-free or overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that baseline [18F] FDG-PET parameters correlated with tumor staging, and only MTV correlated with TRG 1-2. PET parameters failed to predict disease-free and overall survival after treatment completion. The results leave open to further studies the issue of identifying patients suitable for conservative approaches.

Standardized Index of Shape (DCE-MRI) and Standardized Uptake Value (PET/CT): Two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile

Purpose

To investigate dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) in the preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) assessment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) compared to¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT).

Methods

75 consecutive patients with LARC were enrolled in a prospective study. DCE-MRI analysis was performed measuring SIS: linear combination of percentage change (Δ) of maximum signal difference (MSD) and wash-out slope (WOS). ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT analysis was performed using SUV maximum (SUV_max). Tumor regression grade (TRG) were estimated after surgery. Non-parametric tests, receiver operating characteristic were evaluated.

Results

55 patients (TRG1-2) were classified as responders while 20 subjects as non responders. ΔSIS reached sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 80% and accuracy of 89% (cut-off 6%) to differentiate responders by non responders, sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 69% and accuracy of 79% (cut-off 30%) to identify pathological complete response (pCR). Therapy assessment via ΔSUV_max reached sensitivity of 67%, specificity of 75% and accuracy of 70% (cut-off 60%) to differentiate responders by non responders and sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 31% and accuracy of 51% (cut-off 44%) to identify pCR.

Conclusions

CRT response assessment by DCE-MRI analysis shows a higher predictive ability than ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in LARC patients allowing to better discriminate significant and pCR.

Value of FDG-PET/CT Volumetry After Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by an optimal surgery is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. FDG-PET/CT is commonly used as the modality for assessing the effect of chemoradiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether PET/CT-based volumetry could contribute to the prediction of pathological complete response or prognosis after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a single research center.

PATIENTS

Ninety-one consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were enrolled between January 2005 and December 2015.

INTERVENTION

Patients underwent PET/CT before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Maximum standardized uptake value and total lesion glycolysis on PET/CT before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were calculated using isocontour methods. Correlations between these variables and clinicopathological factors and prognosis were assessed.

RESULTS

PET/CT-associated variables before chemoradiotherapy were not correlated with either clinicopathological factors or prognosis. Maximum standardized uptake value was associated with pathological complete response, but total lesion glycolysis was not. Maximum standardized uptake value correlated with ypT, whereas total lesion glycolysis correlated with both ypT and ypN. High total lesion glycolysis was associated with a considerably poorer prognosis; the 5-year recurrence rate was 65% and the 5-year mortality rate 42%, whereas in lesions with low total lesion glycolysis, these were 6% and 2%. On multivariate analysis, high total lesion glycolysis was an independent risk factor for recurrence (HR = 4.718; p = 0.04).

LIMITATIONS

The gain in fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake may differ between scanners, thus the general applicability of this threshold should be validated.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, high total lesion glycolysis after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is strongly associated with a worse prognosis. Total lesion glycolysis after chemoradiotherapy may be a promising preoperative predictor of recurrence and death. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A464.

FDG PET/CT radiomics for predicting the outcome of locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of baseline ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT textural analysis in locally-advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

METHODS

Eighty-six patients with LARC underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT before treatment. Maximum and mean standard uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean), metabolic tumoral volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), histogram-intensity features, as well as 11 local and regional textural features, were evaluated. The relationships of clinical, pathological and PET-derived metabolic parameters with disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Cox regression analysis. Logistic regression was used to predict the pathological response by the Dworak tumor regression grade (TRG) in the 66 patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

RESULTS

The median follow-up of patients was 41 months. Seventeen patients (19.7%) had recurrent disease and 18 (20.9 %) died, either due to cancer progression (n = 10) or from another cause while in complete remission (n = 8). DSS was 95% at 1 year, 93% at 2 years and 87% at 4 years. Weight loss, surgery and the texture parameter coarseness were significantly associated with DSS in multivariate analyses. DFS was 94 % at 1 year, 86 % at 2 years and 79 % at 4 years. From a multivariate standpoint, tumoral differentiation and the texture parameters homogeneity and coarseness were significantly associated with DFS. OS was 93% at 1 year, 87% at 2 years and 79% after 4 years. cT, surgery, SUVmean, dissimilarity and contrast from the neighborhood intensity-difference matrix (contrast_NGTDM) were significantly and independently associated with OS. Finally, RAS-mutational status (KRAS and NRAS mutations) and TLG were significant predictors of pathological response to nCRT (TRG 3-4).

CONCLUSION

Textural analysis of baseline ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT provides strong independent predictors of survival in patients with LARC, with better predictive power than intensity- and volume-based parameters. The utility of such features, especially coarseness, should be confirmed by larger clinical studies before considering their potential integration into decisional algorithms aimed at personalized medicine.

Adaptive radiation dose escalation in rectal adenocarcinoma: a review

Total mesorectal excision (TME) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has offered superior control for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, but can carry a quality of life cost. Fortunately, some patients achieve a complete response after CRT alone without the added morbidity caused by surgery. Efforts to increase fidelity of radiation treatment planning and delivery may allow for escalated doses of radiotherapy (RT) with limited off-target toxicity and elicit more pathological complete responses (pCR) to CRT thereby sparing more rectal cancer patients from surgery. In this review, methods of delivering escalated RT boost above 45-50.4 Gy are discussed including: 3D conformal, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and brachytherapy. Newly developed adaptive boost strategies and imaging modalities used in RT planning and response evaluation such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) are also discussed.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation in Neoadjuvant Therapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Background

The aim of the study was to present an update concerning several imaging modalities in diagnosis, staging and pre-surgery treatment response assessment in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Modalities include: traditional morphological magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional MRI such as dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). A systematic review about the diagnostic accuracy in neoadjuvant therapy response assessment of MRI, DCE-MRI, DWI and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) has been also reported.

Methods

Several electronic databases were searched including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. All the studies included in this review reported findings about therapy response assessment in LARC by means of MRI, DCE-MRI, DWI and PET/CT with details about diagnostic accuracy, true and false negatives, true and false positives. Forest plot and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis were performed. Risk of bias and the applicability at study level were calculated.

Results

Twenty-five papers were identified. ROC curves analysis demonstrated that multimodal imaging integrating morphological and functional MRI features had the best accuracy both in term of sensitivity and specificity to evaluate preoperative therapy response in LARC. DCE-MRI following to PET/CT showed high diagnostic accuracy and their results are also more reliable than conventional MRI and DWI alone.

Conclusions

Morphological MRI is the modality of choice for rectal cancer staging permitting a correct assessment of the disease extent, of the lymph node involvement, of the mesorectal fascia and of the sphincter complex for surgical planning. Multimodal imaging and functional DCE-MRI may also help in the assessment of treatment response allowing to guide the surgeon versus conservative strategies and/or tailored approach such as “wait and see” policy.

Radiation dose intensification in pre-operative chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

To assess the role of radiation dose intensification with simultaneous integrated boost guided by 18-FDG-PET/CT in pre-operative chemo-radiotherapy (ChT-RT) for locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

A prospective study was approved by the Internal Review Board. Inclusion criteria were: age >18 years old, World Health Organization performance status of 0-1, locally advanced histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum within 10 cm of the anal verge, signed specific informed consent. High-dose volumes were defined including the hyper-metabolic areas of 18-FDG-PET/CT of primary tumor and the corresponding mesorectum and/or pelvic nodes with at least a standardized uptake values (SUV) of 5. A dose of 60 Gy/30 fractions was delivered. A total dose of 54 Gy/30 fractions was delivered to prophylactic areas. Capecitabine was administered concomitantly with RT for a dose of 825 mg/mq twice daily for 5 days/every week.

RESULTS

Between September 2011 and July 2015 fortypatients were recruited. At the time of the analysis, median follow up was 20 months (range 5-51). The median interval from the end of ChT-RT to surgery was 9 weeks (range 8-12). Thirty-seven patients (92.5 %) were submitted to sphincter preservation. Tumor Regression Grade (Mandard scale) was recorded as follows: grade 1 in 7 (17.5 %), grade 2 in 17 (42.5 %), grade 3 in 15 (37.5 %) and grade 4 in 1 (2.5 %). Post-surgical circumferential resection margin was negative in all patients. A tumor downstaging was reported in 62.5 % (95 % CI: 0.78-0.47). A nodes downstaging was registered in 85 % (95 % CI: 0.55-0.25). 18-FDG-PET/CT was not able to predict pCR. No correlation was found between pre-treatment SUV-max values and pCR. A metabolic tumor volume >127 cc was related to ypT ≥2 (p 0.01). Patients with TRG >2 had higher tumor lesion glycolysis values (p 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Preliminary results did not confirm some advantages in terms of primary tumor downstaging/downsizing compared to conventional schedules reported in historical series. The role of 18-FDG-PET/CT in neoadjuvant rectal cancer management needs to be confirmed in further investigations. Long terms results are necessary.