Incidental colonic focal FDG uptake on PET/CT: can the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) guide us in the timing of colonoscopy?

Predictive value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in histological grade of incidental colorectal adenoma

BACKGROUND

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) as an imaging modality for the whole body has shown its value in detecting incidental colorectal adenoma. In clinical practice, adenomatous polyps can be divided into three groups: low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN), high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) and cancer, which can lead to different clinical management. However, the relationship between the 18F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax and the histological grade of adenomatous polyps is still not established, which is a challenging but valuable task.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 255 patients with colorectal adenoma (CRA) or colorectal adenocarcinomas (AC) who had corresponding 18F-FDG uptake incidentally found on PET/CT. The correlations of SUVmax with pathological characteristics and tumor size were assessed. Neoplasms were divided into LGIN, HGIN, and AC according to histological grade. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was applied to evaluate the predictive value of the SUVmax-only model and comprehensive models which were established with imaging and clinical predictors identified by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The SUVmax was positively correlated with histological grades (r=0.529, P<0.001). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that SUVmax was an independent risk factor among all groups except between HGIN and AC. The area under the curves (AUCs) of the comprehensive model for distinguishing between AC and adenoma, LGIN and HIGN, LGIN and AC, and HGIN and AC were 0.886, 0.780, 0.945, 0.733, respectively, which is statistically higher than the AUCs of the SUVmax-only model with 0.812, 0.733, 0.863, and 0.688, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

As an independent risk factor, SUVmax based on 18F-FDG PET/CT is highly associated with the histological grade of CRA. Thus, 18F-FDG PET/CT can serve as a noninvasive tool for precise diagnosis and assist in the preoperative formulation of treatment strategies for patients with incidental CRA.

Focal incidental colorectal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: Should it be spotlighted?

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has emerged as a cornerstone in cancer evaluation imaging, with a well-established history spanning several years. This imaging modality, encompassing the examination of the body from the base of the skull to the upper thighs, comprehensively covers the chest and abdominopelvic regions in a singular scan, allowing for a holistic assessment of nearly the entire body, including areas of marginal interest. The inherent advantage of this expansive scan range lies in its potential to unveil unexpected incidental abnormal hypermetabolic areas. The identification of incidental focal FDG uptake within colorectal regions during PET/CT scans is not an uncommon occurrence, albeit fraught with challenges associated with non-specific FDG uptake. The presence of benign colorectal lesions or physiological uptake poses a particular obstacle, as these may manifest with FDG uptake levels that mimic malignancy. Consequently, physicians are confronted with a diagnostic dilemma when encountering abnormal FDG uptake in unexpected colorectal areas. Existing studies have presented divergent results concerning these uptakes. Standardized uptake value and its derivatives have served as pivotal metrics in quantifying FDG uptake in PET images. In this article, we aim to succinctly explore the distinctive characteristics of FDG, delve into imaging findings, and elucidate the clinical significance of incidental focal colorectal uptake. This discussion aims to contribute valuable insights into the nuanced interpretation of such findings, fostering a comprehensive understanding.

[Inflammatory syndrome of unknown origin and PET/CT: Economic and iatrogenic impacts of false positive]

INTRODUCTION

PET/CT is regularly used to investigate inflammatory syndrome of unknown origin (IUO), but hypermetabolisms found are not always consistent with the final diagnosis. The objective of the study was to assess the cost attributed to the diagnostic work-up for these false positives.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an ancillary study on a previous retrospective cohort from the internal medicine department at Amiens university hospital in patients who had a PET/CT scan between October 2004 and April 2017. Patients were included if PET/CT had been prescribed to investigate IUO. Among the 763 PET/CT performed, 144 met the inclusion criteria and a false-positive rate of 17.4% (n=25) was reported.

RESULTS

Among these 25 patients, 21 underwent further investigations. The most frequently found hypermetabolic territories were digestive (n=12, mean SUVmax 8 [±4.33]) and osteoarticular (n=11, mean SUVmax 4.33 [±1.15]). The total cost of the 13 prescribed consultations was €390, the total cost of the 40 additional tests was €4,476 (mainly digestive endoscopies and radiological tests) and the total cost of medical transport was €572. The total cost of the 35 days of hospitalization specifically required to investigate these false positives was €22,952. In 23.8% (n=5), these investigations led to the incidental discovery of tumor lesions.

CONCLUSION

The economic impact of false-positive PET/CT results does not appear to be negligible and merits a genuine prospective medico-economic study.

Unexpected focal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in main organs; pass through or pass by?

Since the inception of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG), positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) utilizing F-18 FDG has become widely accepted as a valuable imaging modality in the field of oncology, with global prevalence in clinical practice. Given that a single Torso PET/CT scan encompasses the anatomical region from the skull base to the upper thigh, the detection of incidental abnormal focal hypermetabolism in areas of limited clinical interest is both feasible and not uncommon. Numerous investigations have been undertaken to delineate the distinctive features of these findings, yet the outcomes have proven inconclusive. The incongruent results of these studies present a challenge for physicians, leaving them uncertain about the appropriate course of action. This article provides a succinct overview of the characteristics of fluorodeoxyglucose, followed by a comprehensive discussion of the imaging findings and clinical significance associated with incidental focal abnormal F-18 FDG activity in several representative organs. In conclusion, while the prevalence of unrecognized malignancy varies across organs, malignancies account for a substantial proportion, ranging from approximately one-third to over half, of incidental focal uptake. In light of these rates, physicians are urged to exercise vigilance in not disregarding unexpected uptake, facilitating more assured clinical decisions, and advocating for further active evaluation.

Assessment of water enema PET/CT: an effective imaging technique for the diagnosis of incidental colorectal 18F-FDG uptake

BACKGROUND

To validate the feasibility of water enema PET/CT (WE-PET/CT) in incidental colorectal 18F-FDG uptake and improve the accuracy of diagnosing colorectal neoplastic lesions.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the electronic records of 338 patients undergoing common PET/CT and WE-PET/CT at our hospital. PET/CT results were correlated with colonoscopy pathology and follow-up results. The ROC contrast curve was plotted to evaluate the accuracy of SUVmax on common PET/CT and WE-PET/CT for detecting neoplastic lesions. SUVmax and the median retention indexes (RIs) of cancerous, precancerous, and benign lesions and physiologic uptake were compared.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of diagnosing neoplastic lesions with common PET/CT were 84.0%, 78.3% and 80.2%, respectively. The corresponding results with WE-PET/CT were 95.8%, 96.5% and 96.2%. The AUC of SUVmax on WE-PET/CT was significantly higher than that on common PET/CT (0.935 vs. 0.524, p < 0.001). The median SUVmax on WE-PET/CT was significantly higher than that on common PET/CT in cancerous and precancerous lesions, and significantly decreased in benign lesions and physiologic uptake (p < 0.001). The RI was significantly different between cancerous lesions and physiologic uptake, between precancerous lesions and physiologic uptake, between benign lesions and physiologic uptake, and between cancerous and benign lesions (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

WE-PET/CT is a noninvasive, well-tolerated and effective technique for diagnosing incidental colorectal 18F-FDG uptake. It is helpful for a timely colonoscopy and can effectively avoid an unnecessary colonoscopy for incidental colorectal 18F-FDG uptake.

PET/CT imaging fibroblast activation protein in initial colorectal cancer: compared to 18 F-FDG PET/CT

OBJECTIVE

In this study, the potential advantage of FAPI over 18 F-labelled deoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) in evaluation of the initial staging colorectal cancer (CRC) was investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients with histopathologically confirmed primary CRC were included in our study. They all underwent both 18 F-FDG and FAPI PET/CT. Lesion detectability and tracer uptakes, mainly quantified by maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratio (TBR), were compared for paired lesions between both modalities using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired t-test.

RESULTS

Thirty-five CRC lesions in 32 patients were diagnosed. The sensitivity of FAPI PET/CT in diagnosis of the CRC lesions was 100% while 93.8% of 18 F-FDG PET/CT. FAPI and 18 F-FDG had a similar uptake in CRC lesion (mean SUVmax: 14.3 ± 8.6 vs. 15.4 ± 9.8, P  = 0.604), but lesions contained mucus and/or signet-ring cell carcinoma seemed to have a trend of higher FAPI uptake although there was no statistical difference (mean SUVmax: 12.7 ± 5.6 vs. 8.5 ± 4.1, P  = 0.152) and higher TBR (13.4 ± 6.2 vs. 4.9 ± 2.2, P  = 0.004) than those of 18 F-FDG. For regional lymph node metastases, both FAPI and FDG PET/CTs showed high sensitivity (7/8 vs. 7/8), specificity (7/8 vs. 6/8) and accuracy (14/16 vs. 13/16) (all P  > 0.05). For distant metastasis, FAPI PET/CT depicted more positive lesions in distant lymph node (46 vs. 26), liver (13 vs. 7) and peritoneum (107 vs. 45) than 18 F-FDG PET/CT. FAPI PET/CT also had a higher peritoneal cancer index score (median 11 vs 4; P  < 0.001) than 18 F-FDG PET/CT in evaluation of peritoneal metastases.

CONCLUSION

FAPI PET/CT showed high sensitivity in detection of primary CRC and superiority to 18 F-FDG PET/CT in detection of metastases to distant lymph node, liver and peritoneum.

Evaluation of Colonoscopic Results of Patients with Incidental Colonic FDG Uptake in PET/CT Imaging

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is a significant global health concern, ranking as the second most deadly and third most common cancer worldwide. Early detection and removal of precancerous lesions play a crucial role in preventing cancer development and reducing mortality. Since FDG uptake is not specific for malignancy, incidental increased FDG uptake in the gastrointestinal tract may be challenging to interpret and may require further colonoscopic examination. This study aimed to investigate the features associated with malignant and premalignant pathology in patients with incidental colonic FDG uptake and determine the necessity of colonoscopy for each FDG uptake.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed on data from patients who underwent colonoscopies between January 2016 and December 2021. Patients with FDG uptake in known colorectal malignancy regions were excluded. The study included 56 patients with incidental colonic FDG uptake. PET/CT images were visually and quantitatively analyzed, and the corresponding colonoscopy and histopathological results were recorded. Statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationship between FDG uptake patterns, SUVmax values, and histopathological diagnoses. Colonoscopic findings were categorized as malignancy, polyps, and non-neoplastic lesions.

RESULTS

Among the 56 patients with incidental colonic FDG uptake, 36 lesions were identified, and histopathology revealed malignancy in 10 (17.9%) patients and premalignant polyps in the 26 (46.4%) cases. Focal FDG uptake with corresponding wall thickening or soft tissue density on CT was associated with a higher likelihood of premalignant or malignant lesions. The SUVmax values demonstrated a significant difference between negative findings and polyps/malignancies. However, no significant difference was observed between malignant and premalignant lesions. A ROC curve analysis was made and assesed a cut-off value of 11.1 SUVmax (sensitivity: 83.3% and specificity: 90%) to distinguish premalignant or malignant lesions from non-malignant lesions.

CONCLUSION

Incidental colonic FDG uptake with a focal pattern and corresponding CT findings were more likely to indicate premalignant or malignant lesions. SUVmax values were helpful in predicting the presence of pathological findings, but histopathological verification remains necessary for a definitive diagnosis. These findings contribute to our understanding of the clinical implications of incidental colonic FDG uptake and highlight the importance of follow-up colonoscopy for further evaluation.

Colonoscopy following the positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan in patients with incidental colorectal uptake: what is the most effective management?

OBJECTIVE

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies. Survival rates are directly related to the stage of cancer at the time of diagnosis, emphasizing the value of early diagnosis. Positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose is the gold standard imaging technique in staging, monitoring after treatment, and follow-up. We aimed to assess the importance of incidental 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by colon and rectum in positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging to determine a significant cutoff value for further investigation using colonoscopy and histopathological assessment.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with both 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan and colonoscopy during 1 year and included the cases who had undergone a colonoscopy within 3 months following the positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan due to an incidental positive finding. Patients with a diagnosed colorectal malignancy or with a history of previous colorectal operations were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients were included in this study. Among 81 colonoscopic evaluations, histopathology revealed malignancy in 8 patients, and the prevalence of incidental colorectal cancer 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake was found to be 9.87%. SUVmax was found to be significantly related to malignancy and other colonoscopic findings (p<0.001). SUVmax cutoff value to suggest colorectal cancer was found to be median [7.9 (4.1-12.7)] (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Regarding the studies determining a significant cutoff value, incidental colonic 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography should lead the clinician to further investigation with colonoscopic biopsy, although the cutoff values for SUVmax are not certain and different in almost every published study, and negative positron emission tomography.computed tomography findings should not completely rule out malignancy, especially in high-risk patients.

Significance of incidental focal fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in colon/rectum, thyroid, and prostate: With a brief literature review

BACKGROUND

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-18 FDG PET/CT), a functional imaging method, is usually performed on the entire torso, and regions of unexpected suspicious focal hypermetabolism are not infrequently observed. Among the regions, colon, thyroid, and prostate were found to be the common organs in a recent umbrella review. Some studies reported that a high rate of malignancy was shown in incidentally identified focal hypermetabolic regions and suggested that further examinations should not be ignored.

AIM

To investigate the malignancy rate of incidental focal FDG uptake, useful PET parameters and their cutoffs in discrimination between malignant and benign lesions.

METHODS

Retrospectively, the final reports of 16510 F-18 FDG PET/CT scans performed at our hospital between January 2016 and March 2022 were reviewed to identify incidentally observed FDG uptake in the colon/rectum, thyroid, and prostate. The scans of patients with current or prior malignancies at each corresponding location, without the final reports of histopathology or colonoscopy (for colon and rectum) for the corresponding hypermetabolic regions, or with diffuse (not focal) hypermetabolism were excluded. Finally, 88 regions of focal colorectal hypermetabolism in 85 patients (48 men and 37 women with mean age 67.0 ± 13.4 years and 63.4 ± 15.8 years, respectively), 48 focal thyroid uptakes in 48 patients (12 men and 36 women with mean age 62.2 ± 13.1 years and 60.8 ± 12.4 years, respectively), and 39 focal prostate uptakes in 39 patients (mean age 71.8 ± 7.5 years) were eligible for this study. For those unexpected focal hypermetabolic regions, rates of malignancy were calculated, PET parameters, such as standardized uptake value (SUV), capable of distinguishing between malignant and benign lesions were investigated, and the cutoffs of those PET parameters were determined by plotting receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

In the colon and rectum, 29.5% (26/88) were malignant and 33.0% (29/88) were premalignant lesions. Both SUVmax and SUVpeak differentiated malignant/premalignant from benign lesions, however, no parameters could distinguish malignant from premalignant lesions. Higher area under the curve was shown with SUVmax (0.752, 95%CI: 0.649-0.856, P < 0.001) and the cutoff was 7.6. In the thyroid, 60.4% (29/48) were malignant. The majority were well-differentiated thyroid cancers (89.7%, 26/29). The results of BRAF mutation tests were available for 20 of the 26 well-differentiated thyroid cancers and all 20 had the mutation. Solely SUVmax differentiated malignant from benign lesions and the cutoff was 6.9. In the prostate, 56.4% (22/39) were malignant. Only SUVmax differentiated malignant from benign lesions and the cutoff was 3.8. Overall, among the 175 focal hypermetabolic regions, 60.6% (106/175) were proven to be malignant and premalignant (in colon and rectum) lesions.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 60% of the incidentally observed focal F-18 FDG uptake in the colon/rectum, thyroid, and prostate were found to be malignant. Of the several PET parameters, SUVmax was superior to others in distinguishing between malignant/premalignant and benign lesions. Based on these findings, incidental focal hypermetabolism should not be ignored and lead physicians to conduct further investigations with greater confidence.

Combined SUVmax and localized colonic wall thickening parameters to identify high-risk lesions from incidental focal colorectal 18F-FDG uptake foci

Objective

To evaluate the detection ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying high-risk lesions (high-risk adenomas and adenocarcinoma) from incidental focal colorectal 18F-FDG uptake foci combining maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and localized colonic wall thickening (CWT). The secondary objective was to investigate the factors of missed detection of high-risk adenomas by 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Patients and methods

A total of 6394 patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT in our hospital from August 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively analysed, and 145 patients with incidental focal colorectal 18F-FDG uptake foci were identified. The optimal cut-off value of SUVmax for 18F-FDG PET/CT diagnosis of high-risk lesions was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. SUVmax and localized CWT were combined to identify high-risk lesions from incidental focal colorectal 18F-FDG uptake foci. The characteristics of incidental adenomas detected and high-risk adenomas missed by 18F-FDG PET/CT were compared.

Results

Of the 6394 patients, 145 patients were found to have incidental focal colorectal FDG uptake foci (2.3%), and 44 patients underwent colonoscopy and pathological examination at the same time. In fact, 45 lesions, including 12 low-risk lesions and 33 high-risk lesions (22 high-risk adenomas, 11 adenocarcinoma), were found by colonoscopy. The area under the ROC curve of SUVmax for low-risk lesions and high-risk lesions was 0.737, and the optimal cut-off value was 6.45 (with a sensitivity of 87.9% and specificity of 58.3%). When SUVmax ≥6.45, the combination of localized CWT parameters has little influence on the sensitivity and specificity of detection; when SUVmax &lt;6.45, the combination of localized CWT parameters can improve the specificity of detection of high-risk lesions, but the sensitivity has little change. In addition, the size of high-risk adenomas discovered incidentally by 18F-FDG PET/CT was larger than that of high-risk adenomas missed, but there was no significant difference in lesion location, pathological type or intraepithelial neoplasia between the two groups.

Conclusions

The combination of SUVmax and localized CWT parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT helped identify high-risk lesions from incidental focal colorectal 18F-FDG uptake foci, especially for lesions with SUVmax &lt;6.45. Lesion size may be the only factor in 18F-FDG PET/CT missing high-risk adenomas.

Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Incidental Focal 18F-FDG Uptake in Colon on PET/CT Imaging

Objectives:

The present study aimed to identify the prevalence of focal uptake in the colon on ¹⁸fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) studies performed for the evaluation of malignancies other than colon, to detect the rate of malignancy in incidental focal ¹⁸F-FDG avid colonic lesions and to investigate if any possible role of maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) values in the discrimination of malignant lesions from premalignant and benign ones exist.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed the files of 8,017 patients with known or suspected malignancy, who underwent whole-body ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT at our institution during the period November 2017 to November 2019. Patients showing a single site of focally increased colonic ¹⁸F-FDG uptake that was more intense compared to liver uptake on ¹⁸F-FDG PET studies and referred to colonoscopy were enrolled in the study.

Results:

Fifty two patients (83.8%) had at least 1 corresponding lesion on colonoscopy, whereas in 10 patients no lesion was detected. Subsequent histopathological examinations revealed no corresponding lesion in 13 (13.7%), a benign lesion in 18 (18.9%), hyperplastic polyp in 10 (10.5%), low-grade polyp in 16 (16.8%), high-grade polyp in 29 (30.5%) and malignant lesion in 9 (9.5%) of the focal ¹⁸F-FDG uptake sites. According to histopathology results, statistically no significant difference was found between the SUV_max measurements of malignant and benign cases (p>0.05) but the average SUV_max measurements of malignant cases were found to be significantly higher than lower + high-grade cases (p<0.05) and hyperplastic polyp cases (p<0.01).

Conclusion:

In conclusion, any unexpected focal ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT studies is suspicious for malignancy and should be clarified by colonoscopy. The intensity of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake does not preclude the application of colonoscopy and histopathological verification of the lesion if there is any.

Assessment of incidental focal colorectal uptake by analysis of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters

BACKGROUND

Colon and rectal cancers are among the top five cancers worldwide in terms of their incidence and mortality rates. As the treatment options for cure include surgery even in specific advanced-stage cases, the early detection of lesions is important for applying active treatment methods. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is an established imaging study for many types of cancers; however, physiologic uptake in the gastrointestinal tract is a frequent finding and may interfere with lesion identification. Nevertheless, as unexpectedly observed focal colorectal F-18 FDG uptake may harbor malignant lesions, further examination must not be avoided.

AIM

To assess the clinical implications of unexpected focal colorectal F-18 FDG uptake by analyzing FDG PET parameters.

METHODS

A total of 15143 F-18 FDG PET/CT scans performed at our hospital between January 2016 and September 2021 were retrospectively reviewed to identify incidentally observed focal colorectal FDG uptake. Finally, 83 regions showing focal colorectal FDG uptake with final histopathological reports from 80 patients (45 men and 35 women with mean ages of 66.9 ± 10.7 years and 63.7 ± 15.3 years, respectively) were eligible for inclusion in the present study. Each focal hypermetabolic colorectal region was classified as malignant, premalignant, or benign according to the histopathological report. PET parameters such as maximum and peak standardized uptake value (SUVmax and SUVpeak), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), mean SUV of the metabolic tumor volume (mSUVmtv), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured or calculated for the corresponding hypermetabolic regions. Parametric and non-parametric statistical comparisons of these parameters were performed among the three groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted to identify cut-off values.

RESULTS

The detection rate of incidental focal colorectal uptake was 0.53% (80/15,143). Of the 83 regions with unexpected focal colorectal hypermetabolism, 28.9% (24/83) were malignant, 32.5% (27/83) were premalignant, and 38.6% (32/83) were benign. Overall, 61.4% of the regions had malignant or premalignant lesions. SUVmax, SUVpeak, and mSUVmtv differentiated malignant and/or premalignant lesions from benign lesions with statistical significance (P < 0.05). mSUVmtv3.5 differentiated malignant from benign lesions, with the largest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.792 and a cut-off of 4.9. SUVmax showed the largest AUC of 0.758 with a cut-off value of 7.5 for distinguishing between premalignant and benign lesions. Overall, SUVmax with a cut-off value of 7.6 (AUC: 0.770, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.668-0.872; sensitivity, 0.686; specificity, 0.688) was a superior parameter for distinguishing between malignant/premalignant and benign lesions or physiologic uptake. No parameters differentiated malignant from premalignant lesions. Moderate or weak positive correlations were observed between the long diameter of the malignant lesions and PET parameters such as SUVpeak and some mSUVmtv.

CONCLUSION

Approximately two-thirds (61.4%) of incidental focal hypermetabolic colorectal regions were malignant/premalignant lesions, for which SUVmax was an independent diagnostic parameter. Unexpected suspicious focal colorectal FDG uptake should not be avoided and consideration for further evaluation is strongly recommended not to miss the two-thirds.

Correlation between incidental focal colorectal FDG uptake on PET/CT and colonoscopic and histopathological results

OBJECTIVE AND AIMS

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between incidental focal colorectal foci on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) with colonoscopic and histopathological results. The secondary aim was to determine to what extent these findings led to a change in patient management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed among 5850 patients who had an FDG-PT/CT scan from July 2015 to July 2018. Among these patients, we identified patients with a PET/CT description of incidental colorectal FDG uptake, and a colonoscopy within 90 days from the PET/CT scan. PET/CT findings were compared with colonoscopy-detected lesions and eventually histopathology on a per-lesion analysis and a per-person analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients were included in the study. A total of 180 foci of colorectal FDG uptake were detected on FDG-PET/CT. Of these, 86 foci corresponded to advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACRN), positive predictive value (PPV) 47.8%; 95% CI: 40.5-55.1%). On a per-patient analysis 81 patients had a least one ACRN at colonoscopy (PPV 55.9%; 95% CI: 47.6-63.8), this group included 20 patients (13.8%) diagnosed with cancer. There was a small positive correlation between focal FDG-uptake and the finding of ACRN at the same colonic segment at colonoscopy, which was statistically significant, rho = 0.2565, p = .002. The findings changed patient management in 67 (46.2%) cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidental focal colorectal FDG uptake on PET/CT is associated with a high risk of ACRN and is affecting subsequent patient management. Further evaluation with colonoscopy is recommended when the patient is considered suitable for further treatment.

F-18 FDG PET/CT Imaging in Normal Variants, Pitfalls and Artifacts in the Abdomen and Pelvis

Since its introduction into clinical practice, multimodality imaging has revolutionized diagnostic imaging for both oncologic and non-oncologic pathologies. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT imaging which takes advantage of increased anaerobic glycolysis that occurs in tumor cells (Warburg effect) has gained significant clinical relevance in the management of most, if not all oncologic conditions. Because FDG is taken by both normal and abnormal tissues, PET/CT imaging may demonstrate several normal variants and imaging pitfalls. These may ultimately impact disease detection and diagnostic accuracy. Imaging specialists (nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists) must demonstrate a thorough understanding of normal and physiologic variants in the distribution of 18F-FDG; including potential imaging pitfalls and technical artifacts to minimize misinterpretation of images. The normal physiologic course of 18F-FDG results in a variable degree of uptake in the stomach, liver, spleen, small and large bowel. Urinary excretion results in renal, ureteric, and urinary bladder uptake. Technical artifacts can occur due to motion, truncation as well as the effects of contrast agents and metallic hardware. Using pictorial illustrations, this paper aims to describe the variants of physiologic 18F-FDG uptake that may mimic pathology as well as potential benign conditions that may result in misinterpretation of PET/CT images in common oncologic conditions of the abdomen and pelvis.

Rectal operative bed: ?tumor? post-management changes … positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can answer

Background

Rectal cancer is a common malignancy that continues to have a highly variable outcome. Local pelvic recurrence following surgery is usually leading to incurable disease. Surgical resection with stage-appropriate combined-modality therapy is the mainstay in the treatment of rectal cancer. A difficulty has been reported in distinguishing the benign post-management findings from tumor recurrence. By adding the metabolic changes to the post-operative morphologic changes, combined positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) may offer clinically useful addition in operative bed evaluation.

Results

The study included 30 patients, 17 males (56.6%) and 13 females (43.3%). Suspicious operative bed findings included pre-sacral soft tissue density noted in 20 patients (66%), anastomotic site mural thickening in five patients (16.6%), and post-operative loco-regional nodes in five patients (16.6%). Moreover, pre-sacral soft tissue focal avid uptake was noted in 17 patients (17/20, 85%), and no uptake noted in three patients (3/20, 15%). Anastomotic site mural thickening was seen in five patients with positive uptake noted in three patients (3/5, 60%), and no uptake seen in two patients (2/5, 40%). Loco-regional nodes were seen in five patients with positive uptake in five patients. The most accurate SUV max cut-off value among studied cases was 3.5. Confirmation of PET/CT results was done by histopathological assessment in ten patients (33.3%) and by follow up after 6 months in 20 patients (66.6%) with recurrence noted in 15 patients (75%) and normal post-operative findings noted in five patients (25%).

Conclusion

PET/CT study is an effective tool for evaluation of suspicious colorectal oncologic operative bed findings noted in the routine CT studies. PET/CT fusion images affect the clinical management by guiding further procedures (surgery and radiation therapy).

Incidental anal 18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: Should we further examine the patient?

BACKGROUND

There are no studies on incidental anal ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸FDG) uptake.

AIM

To assess the rate and aetiologies of incidental anal ¹⁸FDG uptake and to evaluate the correlation between ¹⁸FDG positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) parameters and the diagnosis of an anorectal disease.

METHODS

The data from patients with incidental anal ¹⁸FDG uptake were retrospectively analysed. Patients who underwent anorectal examinations were identified and compared to those who did not undergo examinations. Patients who were offered treatment were then identified and compared to those who did not receive treatment.

RESULTS

Among the 43020 ¹⁸FDG PET/CT scans performed, 197 ¹⁸FDG PET/CT scans of 146 patients (0.45%) reported incidental anal uptake. Among the 134 patients included, 48 (35.8%) patients underwent anorectal examinations, and anorectal diseases were diagnosed in 33 (69.0%) of these patients and treated in 18/48 (37.5%) patients. Among the examined patients, those with a pathology requiring treatment had significantly smaller metabolic volumes (MV) 30 and MV41 values and higher maximal and mean standardized uptake value measurements than those who did not require treatment.

CONCLUSION

Incidental anal ¹⁸FDG uptake is rare, but a reliable anorectal diagnosis is commonly obtained when an anorectal examination is performed. The diagnosis of an anorectal disease induces treatment in more than one-third of the patients. These data should encourage practitioners to explore incidental anal ¹⁸FDG uptake systematically.

Distinguishing Lymphomatous and Cancerous Lymph Nodes in 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography by Radiomics Analysis

Background. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend excisional biopsies for the diagnosis of lymphomas. However, resection biopsies in all patients who are suspected of having malignant lymph nodes may cause unnecessary injury and increase medical costs. We investigated the usefulness of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission/computed tomography- (18F-FDG-PET/CT-) based radiomics analysis for differentiating between lymphomatous lymph nodes (LLNs) and cancerous lymph nodes (CLNs). Methods. Using texture analysis, radiomic parameters from the 18F-FDG-PET/CT images of 492 lymph nodes (373 lymphomatous lymph nodes and 119 cancerous lymph nodes) were extracted with the LIFEx package. Predictive models were generated from the six parameters with the largest area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) in PET or CT images in the training set (70% of the data), using binary logistic regression. These models were applied to the test set to calculate predictive variables, including the combination of PET and CT predictive variables (PREcombination). The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were used to compare the differentiating ability of the predictive variables. Results. Compared with the pathological diagnosis of the patient’s primary tumor, the AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PREcombination in differentiating between LLNs and CLNs were 0.95, 91.67%, 94.29%, and 92.96%, respectively. Moreover, PREcombination could effectively distinguish LLNs caused by various lymphoma subtypes (Hodgkin’s lymphoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma) from CLNs, with the AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy being 0.85 and 0.90, 77.78% and 77.14%, 97.22% and 88.89%, and 90.74% and 83.10%, respectively. Conclusions. Radiomics analysis of 18F-FDG-PET/CT images may provide a noninvasive, effective method to distinguish LLN and CLN and inform the choice between fine-needle aspiration and excision biopsy for sampling suspected lymphomatous lymph nodes.

Colorectal cancer: Parametric evaluation of morphological, functional and molecular tomographic imaging

Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents one of the leading causes of tumor-related deaths worldwide. Among the various tools at physicians' disposal for the diagnostic management of the disease, tomographic imaging (e.g., CT, MRI, and hybrid PET imaging) is considered essential. The qualitative and subjective evaluation of tomographic images is the main approach used to obtain valuable clinical information, although this strategy suffers from both intrinsic and operator-dependent limitations. More recently, advanced imaging techniques have been developed with the aim of overcoming these issues. Such techniques, such as diffusion-weighted MRI and perfusion imaging, were designed for the "in vivo" evaluation of specific biological tissue features in order to describe them in terms of quantitative parameters, which could answer questions difficult to address with conventional imaging alone (e.g., questions related to tissue characterization and prognosis). Furthermore, it has been observed that a large amount of numerical and statistical information is buried inside tomographic images, resulting in their invisibility during conventional assessment. This information can be extracted and represented in terms of quantitative parameters through different processes (e.g., texture analysis). Numerous researchers have focused their work on the significance of these quantitative imaging parameters for the management of CRC patients. In this review, we aimed to focus on evidence reported in the academic literature regarding the application of parametric imaging to the diagnosis, staging and prognosis of CRC while discussing future perspectives and present limitations. While the transition from purely anatomical to quantitative tomographic imaging appears achievable for CRC diagnostics, some essential milestones, such as scanning and analysis standardization and the definition of robust cut-off values, must be achieved before quantitative tomographic imaging can be incorporated into daily clinical practice.

Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT for characterization of colorectal focal FDG uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to explore the role of the diagnostic accuracy of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for characterization of incidental colorectal focal FDG uptake through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library database, from the earliest available date of indexing through April 30, 2018, were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT for characterization of incidental colorectal focal FDG uptake. We determined the sensitivities and specificities across studies, calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Across 8 studies (1451 patients), the pooled sensitivity for F-18 FDG PET/CT was 0.87 (95% CI 0.82-0.90) without heterogeneity (χ² = 10.84, p = 0.37) and a pooled specificity of 0.83 (95% CI 0.76-0.89) with heterogeneity (χ² = 130.1, p = 0.00). Likelihood ratio (LR) syntheses gave an overall positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 5.2 (95% CI 3.6-7.4) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.16 (95% CI 0.12-0.22). The pooled DOR was 32 (95% CI 20-51).

CONCLUSION

F-18 FDG PET/CT demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity for characterization of incidental colorectal focal FDG uptake. At present, the literature regarding the use of F-18 FDG PET/CT for characterization of incidental colorectal focal FDG uptake remains still limited; thus, further large multicenter studies would be necessary to substantiate the diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT for characterization of incidental colorectal focal FDG uptake.

Clinical-endoscopic relevance of incidental colorectal lesions detected by PET-CT

AIM

to determine the proportion of incidental colon lesions detected by PET-CT and their correlation with the endoscopic and histological findings. In addition, to determine the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) that can discriminate between benign and malignant lesions in our series of cases.

METHODS

this was a retrospective study of 3,000 patients evaluated by PET-CT for staging or response to treatment of primary neoplasms, between 2011 and 2015. Patients with incidental uptake in the colon were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included an incomplete, poorly prepared or abandoned colonoscopy, inflammatory bowel disease and treatment with metformin.

RESULTS

the study cohort comprised 71 patients evaluated by PET-CT and subsequently analyzed by endoscopy; 69% were male with a mean age of 65.77 ± 11.2. The rate of incidental colon lesions found by PET-CT was 1.73%, with 52 incidental colonic uptakes reported in 50 patients. The location of the uptake was the rectum (19.23%), sigmoid colon (34.62%), descending colon (13.46%), transverse colon (1.9%), ascending colon (19.23%), cecum (9.62%) and ileocolic anastomosis (1.92%). Thirty-five pathological colonoscopies (71.15%) were identified: the findings included five neoplasms (13.51%), two inflammatory lesions (5.4%) and 30 adenomatous polyps (81.1%). Significant differences were found between neoplastic SUVmax (11.7 g/ml; p = 0.03) and polyps (9.26 g/ml; p = 0.04) in relation to inflammatory lesions and normal endoscopies (6.05 g/ml). There were no differences in terms of the size of the polyps, nor the presence or absence of high grade dysplasia (p = 0.12 and 0.33). Both PET-CT and endoscopy proved consistent for locating lesions (k 0.90; CI 95% 0.86-0.93).

CONCLUSION

there is a good correlation between the findings identified by PET-CT and the endoscopic study. In our study, a SUVmax > 11 g/ml suggests a malignant pathology, which aids the prioritization of an endoscopic study.

Evidence-based management of incidental focal uptake of fluorodeoxyglucose on PET-CT

Focal incidental uptake, with or without CT abnormalities, is a common finding on fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and evidence-based management for this type of uptake is lacking. This article reviews the evidence on focal incidental uptake including the incidence of malignancy, differential diagnosis and imaging criteria which can be used to further characterize it. The article focusses on PET rather than CT criteria. The strength of the evidence base is highly variable ranging from systematic reviews and meta-analyses to a virtual absence of evidence. Caution needs to be used when using standardized uptake values (SUVs) reported in other studies due to interpatient and institution observed variation in SUVs. There is sufficient evidence to permit specific suggestions on how to interpret the foci and recommend further management in the: pituitary (investigate when SUVmax >4.1), thyroid (investigate all), breast (investigate all), lung parenchyma (if focus of fluorodeoxyglucose without a CT nodule, no further investigations), colon (investigate all foci with SUVmax >5.9, urgently if SUVmax >11.4), adrenals (criteria depend on if patient has cancer) and prostate gland (investigate in males aged >50 years or >40 years if peripheral uptake or patient has other risk factors). There is some evidence to guide further management for the parotid gland, naso-orophaynx, oesophagus, pancreas, uterus and ovaries. There is insufficient evidence to guide management for the liver, spleen, kidneys, gallbladder, testis and bone, for these organs patient characteristics and other guidelines will likely be of more use in determining further management.

Incidental colorectal focal 18 F-FDG uptake: a novel indication for colonoscopy

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 The relevance of incidental colorectal focal ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT uptake is debatable. All patients who were referred for colonoscopy because of incidental colonic focal FDG uptake were included in this retrospective study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 PET/CT imaging characteristics were reviewed by a nuclear physician who was blinded to endoscopic and histopathological findings to determine the location of FDG uptake sites and to measure the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and metabolic volume (MV). Endoscopic findings were categorized as malignant lesions (ML), high-risk polyps (HRP), low-risk polyps (LRP) or other non-neoplastic lesions (NNL).

RESULTS

 Seventy patients with 84 foci of FDG uptake were included. The proportions of true-positive (lesions found at colonoscopy at the same location) and false-positive (no lesion at colonoscopy) PET/CT findings were 65.5 % (n = 55) and 34.5 % (n = 29). Median SUVmax values did not differ between true-positive and false-positive findings ( P  = 0.27). Median MV30 values differed significantly between true-positive (5.5 cm ³ , [3.3 - 10.9 cm ³ ]) and false-positive (9.7 cm ³ , [5.2 - 40.8 cm ³ ]) findings ( P  = 0.015). Among the 55 true-positive FDG uptake sites, there were 14 (25.5 %) malignant lesions, 30 (54.5 %) HRP, 4 (7.3 %) LRP, and 7 (12.7 %) NNL. Median MV30 values differed significantly between advanced neoplasia (5.0 cm ³ , [2.9 - 9.7 cm ³ ]) and other endoscopic findings (9.4 cm ³ , [5.2 - 39.8 cm ³ ]) ( P  = 0.001); the AUROC was 0.71. By per-colonic segment analysis, the distribution of true-positive, false-negative, false-positive, and true-negative FDG PET/CT findings was as follows: 21.5 %, 14.2 %, 11.5 %, and 52.8 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

 Our study demonstrates that follow-up complete colonoscopy is mandatory in all patients with incidental colorectal focal ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT uptake.

Incidental focal colonic uptake in studies 18F-FDG PET/CT

OBJECTIVES

To assess the frequency of focal colonic uptake as an incidental observation in ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT studies, and to correlate this finding with histopathological results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Out of a total of 3,176 PET/CT studies with ¹⁸F-FDG systematic analysis was carried out on 30 studies in which colonic focal uptake was observed. Patients with known colorectal neoplasia were excluded. The maximum standardised uptake values (SUVm) and the morphological findings provided by the CT were recorded. The studies were reported by a radiologist and a nuclear medicine doctor. The findings were compared with endoscopy and pathology findings.

RESULTS

Of the 30 patients with focal hypermetabolic lesions of the colon (0.94%), 15 were men and 15 were women with ages between 27 and 73 (mean 55 years). The reasons for PET/CT were bronchopulmonary cancer (4), breast cancer (4), tumour of unknown origin (4), melanoma (3), renal carcinoma (3), cervical neoplasia (2), adenocarcinoma of ovary (2), and others (8). Of the 23 colonoscopies performed, 10 patients (43.4%) had malignant lesions, 6 (26.1%) had pre-malignant lesions, and in 7 patients (30.4%) no lesion was identified or was benign. No endoscopy was performed on 7 patients for various reasons (patient refusal to perform the study, advanced oncological disease). An analysis was performed with the SUVm, with no statistically significant differences being found between malignant-premalignant lesions and benign lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Focal uptake in the colon of ¹⁸F-FDG has clinical relevance, and is mainly associated with morphological lesions in CT. It should be evaluated, as it may be a second tumour or a pre-malignant lesion. It is recommended that all focal uptakes of the colon be evaluated with endoscopy.

Incidental colorectal FDG uptake on PET/CT scan and lesions observed during subsequent colonoscopy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Incidental colorectal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake can be observed during a positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan. For clinical and/or histological assessment of the cause, a colonoscopy is then performed. A systematic review was conducted to investigate the relationship between incidental colorectal FDG uptake and lesions observed during a subsequent colonoscopy.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science with the keywords concerning PET/CT scan and colonoscopy. The studies were selected using inclusion criteria defined a priori and were described individually to examine the correlation between incidental colorectal FDG uptake and the lesions found at colonoscopy.

RESULTS

Twenty-six of 1606 studies found were included. In total, 108,578 patients underwent an FDG-PET/CT scan as part of a diagnostic work-up or cancer staging. In total, 2546 incidental colorectal FDG uptakes were described in 2121 patients (mean age 62.7 years SD ± 5.1), of which 2045 uptakes in 1635 patients were examined by colonoscopy, within a mean of 37 days (SD ± 28). The colonoscopic lesions included neoplasms (n = 1097; 322 cancers), benign lesions (n = 273), and inflammatory lesions (n = 71). Colonoscopies were normal in 604 patients. In total, 82% of lesions were located in the same location as the FDG uptakes. The positive predictive value was 70% (95% CI [68-72]).

CONCLUSIONS

Incidental colorectal FDG uptake, as evaluated by subsequent colonoscopy, often reveals neoplastic lesions. Predominantly, lesions were located at the same location as FDG uptake. Further investigation is warranted before recommending that incidental colorectal FDG uptake should always result in referral to diagnostic colonoscopy.

Functional assessment of prefrontal lobes in patients with major depression disorder using a dual-mode technique of 3D-arterial spin labeling and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography

The aim of this study was to explore the functions of cerebral blood perfusion and glucose metabolism in the prefrontal lobe of patients with major depression disorder (MDD), and to analyze the correlations between these functional changes and depressive symptoms. 3D-arterial spin labeling (ASL) and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) were successfully performed in 17 patients with MDD and 16 healthy controls in a resting state. The depressive symptoms of the patients were classified into seven factors and scored with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) values and standardized uptake values (SUV) of ¹⁸F-FDG in the whole brain were respectively compared between the patients and healthy controls using a two-sample t-test, and the correlations between the CBF and SUV in the prefrontal cerebral regions with the patients' Hamilton scores were evaluated using Pearson correlation analysis. Decreased regional CBF was indicated in the bilateral middle and the right superior frontal gyri, and decreased regional SUV was indicated in the bilateral superior, middle and inferior frontal gyri in the MDD patients compared with the controls. Positive correlations were observed between CBF values and aggregate Hamilton scores in the left middle and right middle frontal gyri of the patients. Positive correlations were also observed between SUVs and aggregate Hamilton scores in the left middle and right middle frontal gyri. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was indicated to be more sensitive than 3D-ASL in identifying the functional abnormalities in the prefrontal lobe. Decreased CBF and SUV in the prefrontal lobe were closely correlated with Hamilton score. The left middle frontal gyrus may be a key functional region in MDD.

Clinicopathological analysis and risk factors of advanced colorectal neoplasms incidentally detected by 18F-FDG PET-CT

BACKGROUND

As the clinical use of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-computed tomography (F-FDG PET-CT) has increased, the incidental finding of F-FDG uptake with subsequent diagnosis of advanced neoplasm at colorectum has increased. The aim of this study is to analyze the characteristics and risk factors of advanced colorectal neoplasm incidentally detected by F-FDG PET-CT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent colonoscopy because of an incidental finding of F-FDG uptake at the colorectum from January 2006 to January 2015 at Yeungnam University Hospital were reviewed retrospectively. Advanced neoplasm was defined as adenoma of at least 10 mm, adenoma with serrated or villous component, high-grade dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Of the 19 798 candidates, 180 patients with incidental colorectal F-FDG uptake were included in this study. The indications of PET-CT were metastasis work-up, health screening, and others. The male to female ratio was 1.6 : 1 and the mean age was 62.7±11.4 years. A total of 156 lesions were detected in the colorectum and 86 (47.8%) were diagnosed as advanced neoplasms. Of the 86 patients with advanced neoplasms, 34 (39.5%) underwent an operation, 34 (39.5%) underwent endoscopic resection, and 18 (20.9%) underwent chemotherapy or conservative treatments. In univariate analysis, age of 62.5 years or older, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) of at least 3.4 ng/ml, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of at least 8.0, hypertension, F-FDG uptake on the rectosigmoid, and PET-CT for metastasis work-up showed a significant association with advanced neoplasm. In multivariate analysis, CEA (P=0.028), SUVmax (P<0.001) and an indication of PET-CT for metastasis work-up (P=0.008) were independent predictors of advanced neoplasm.

CONCLUSION

Colonoscopy should be recommended in case of F-FDG uptake at the colorectum, particularly in patients with CEA of at least 3.4 ng/ml, SUVmax of at least 8.0, or metastasis work-up of malignancy.

Focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT: maximum standard uptake value as a trigger in a semi-automated screening setting

BACKGROUND

Focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT may be associated with a malignancy and can be quantified. This provides the basis for an automatic trigger threshold above which cases are flagged for colonoscopic evaluation and below which for individual assessment.

PURPOSE

To determine the lowest maximum standard uptake (SUVmax) in colorectal cancer that could be used as a threshold to trigger endoscopic evaluation and to evaluate whether the SUVmax needs to be further normalised to a priori known extrinsic factors.

METHODS

The SUVmax was measured in 54 colorectal carcinomas and correlated with gender, age, blood glucose level, injected activity, body mass index and time to scan using t test or correlation coefficients (Pearson or Spearman, according to distribution).

RESULTS

There was no correlation between SUVmax and any of the extrinsic factors mentioned above. The lowest SUVmax value was 5 [mean ± SD (range): 11.1 ± 4.8 (5.0-24.6)].

CONCLUSION

In contrast to most other screening techniques, semi-automation in colorectal screening seems possible with PET/CT. This opens the door for further study into the feasibility of automated screening. Independent from extrinsic factors, an SUVmax ≥5.0 in a focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT should automatically trigger for endoscopic evaluation, if not contraindicated. Cases with SUVmax <5 should be assessed individually before referral for endoscopy. Thus, more interpretation time could be spent on those cases with a lower uptake and more ambiguous diagnosis.

Metabolic Tumor Volume on 18F-FDG PET/CT Improves Preoperative Identification of High-Risk Endometrial Carcinoma Patients

Our objective was to prospectively explore the diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative staging in endometrial carcinomas and to investigate whether (18)F-FDG PET-specific quantitative tumor parameters reflect clinical and histologic characteristics.

METHODS

Preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT was prospectively performed on 129 consecutive endometrial carcinoma patients. Two physicians who did not know the clinical findings or staging results independently reviewed the images, assessing primary tumor, cervical stroma involvement and metastatic spread, and determining maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmax and SUVmean, respectively) for tumor, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). All parameters were analyzed in relation to histomorphologic and clinical tumor characteristics. Receiver-operating-characteristic curves for identification of deep myometrial invasion and lymph node metastases were generated, and MTV cutoffs for predicting deep myometrial invasion and lymph node metastases were calculated.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of lymph node metastases were 77%-85%, 91%-96%, and 89%-93%, respectively. SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, and TLG were significantly related to deep myometrial invasion, presence of lymph node metastases, and high histologic grade (P < 0.015 for all) and independently predicted deep myometrial invasion (P < 0.015) and lymph node metastases (P < 0.025) after adjustment for preoperative histologic risk (based on subtype and grade) in endometrial biopsies. Optimal cutoffs for MTV in predicting deep myometrial invasion (20 mL) and the presence of lymph node metastases (30 mL) yielded odds ratios of 7.8 (P < 0.001) and 16.5 (P = 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

(18)F-FDG PET/CT represents a clinically valuable tool for preoperatively evaluating the presence of lymph node metastases in endometrial carcinoma patients. Applying MTV cutoffs for the prediction of deep myometrial invasion and lymph node metastases may increase diagnostic accuracy and aid preoperative identification of high-risk patients, enabling restriction of lymphadenectomy for patients with a low risk of aggressive disease.