1
|
Dong ZY, Zhu HB. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis arising from peritoneal space: A case report and review of literature. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31:105443. [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i18.105443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2025] [Revised: 03/27/2025] [Accepted: 04/24/2025] [Indexed: 05/13/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retroperitoneal fibrosis is a rare fibro-inflammatory condition which can be classified into idiopathic (accounting for over 75%) and secondary types (due to malignancies, infections, medications, radiotherapy or other conditions). Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (IRPF) typically affects the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries along with the surrounding retroperitoneal area. This case review aims to summarize the imaging characteristics of IRPF arising from the peritoneal space.
CASE SUMMARY An abdominal mass was discovered in a 52-year-old man during a routine physical examination, he had not complained of abdominal pain, distension, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fever, and had no significant past medical or family history. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging revealed a soft tissue mass with poorly defined margins surrounding the duodenum, exhibiting slight to moderate high signal intensity on both T1-weighted and T2-weighted images. Diffusion-weighted imaging with a β value of 800 mm²/second demonstrated slightly to moderate high signal intensity. Dynamic contrast enhanced images showed uneven enhancement on the arterial phase, with significant enhancement observed on the delayed phase. The mass infiltrated adjacent structures, including the head of the pancreas, the hepatic flexure of the colon, and part of the intestine, raising suspicion for malignant tumors such as sarcoma or lymphoma. However, surgery confirmed the diagnosis of IRPF. The patient underwent routine follow-up for one year, with no recurrence.
CONCLUSION IRPF is a rare condition that presents considerable diagnostic challenges when lesions arise from the peritoneal space. In cases where imaging findings are atypical, a further puncture biopsy may be necessary to confirm the diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen-Yu Dong
- Department of Radiology, Qingdao Huangdao District People’s Hospital, Qingdao 266400, Shandong Province, China
| | - Hai-Bin Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Czerniak S, Mathur M. Multimodality imaging review of retroperitoneal fibrosis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2025:10.1007/s00261-025-04847-6. [PMID: 40035807 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-04847-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2024] [Revised: 02/10/2025] [Accepted: 02/11/2025] [Indexed: 03/06/2025]
Abstract
Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is a rare fibroinflammatory disease with idiopathic and secondary causes. Idiopathic disease is more common and is believed to be immune mediated; associations with autoimmune diseases and/or inflammatory disorders such as IgG4 related disease are often present. Common complications include hydronephrosis and venous stenosis and/or thrombosis. Due to its nonspecific clinical presentation, imaging is vital for diagnosis; in addition, imaging may help distinguish idiopathic from secondary causes and can aid in distinguishing early/active disease from chronic/inactive disease. Magnetic resonance imaging is the preferred imaging modality to stage and monitor the disease, though CT and PET/CT imaging may also be of value. While the imaging findings can overlap with other diseases, there are some characteristic findings which can favor RPF. However, a biopsy is needed for a definitive diagnosis.The following article discusses the clinical features, imaging appearances across modalities, associated complications, potential diagnostic pitfalls, and treatment approaches for RPF. The role of advanced imaging techniques, such as diffuse weighted imaging and 18F-FDG PET/MRI, in the evaluation of RPF will also be included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Czerniak
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Mahan Mathur
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pathak P, Abandeh L, Aboughalia H, Pooyan A, Mansoori B. Overview of F18-FDG uptake patterns in retroperitoneal pathologies: imaging findings, pitfalls, and artifacts. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:1677-1698. [PMID: 38652126 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-04139-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Retroperitoneum can be the origin of a wide variety of pathologic conditions and potential space for disease spread to other compartments of the abdomen and pelvis. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are often the initial imaging modalities to evaluate the retroperitoneal pathologies, however given the intrinsic limitations, F18-FDG PET/CT provides additional valuable metabolic information which can change the patient management and clinical outcomes. We highlight the features of retroperitoneal pathologies on F18-FDG PET/CT and the commonly encountered imaging artifacts and pitfalls. The aim of this review is to characterize primary and secondary retroperitoneal pathologies based on their metabolic features, and correlate PET findings with anatomic imaging. CONCLUSION Retroperitoneal pathologies can be complex, ranging from oncologic to a spectrum of non-oncologic disorders. While crosse-sectional imaging (CT and MRI) are often the initial imaging modalities to localize and characterize pathologies, metabolic information provided by F18-FDG PET/CT can change the management and clinical outcome in many cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Pathak
- Abdominal Imaging and Nuclear Medicine Divisions, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
| | - Laith Abandeh
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Hassan Aboughalia
- Department of Radiology, Children's National Hospital, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Atefe Pooyan
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Bahar Mansoori
- Abdominal Imaging Division, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bartlett DJ, Takahashi H, Bach CR, Lunn B, Thorpe MP, Broski SM, Packard AT, Fletcher JG, Navin PJ. Potential applications of PET/MRI in non-oncologic conditions within the abdomen and pelvis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:3624-3633. [PMID: 37145312 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03922-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
PET/MRI is a relatively new imaging modality with several advantages over PET/CT that promise to improve imaging of the abdomen and pelvis for specific diagnostic tasks by combining the superior soft tissue characterization of MRI with the functional information acquired from PET. PET/MRI has an established role in staging and response assessment of multiple abdominopelvic malignancies, but the modality is not yet established for non-oncologic conditions of the abdomen and pelvis. In this review, potential applications of PET/MRI for non-oncologic conditions of abdomen and pelvis are outlined, and the available literature is reviewed to highlight promising areas for further research and translation into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Corrie R Bach
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Brendan Lunn
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | | | | | - Ann T Packard
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dondi F, Albano D, Giubbini R, Bertagna F. PET in idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-822960-6.00059-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
6
|
Casali M, Lauri C, Altini C, Bertagna F, Cassarino G, Cistaro A, Erba AP, Ferrari C, Mainolfi CG, Palucci A, Prandini N, Baldari S, Bartoli F, Bartolomei M, D’Antonio A, Dondi F, Gandolfo P, Giordano A, Laudicella R, Massollo M, Nieri A, Piccardo A, Vendramin L, Muratore F, Lavelli V, Albano D, Burroni L, Cuocolo A, Evangelista L, Lazzeri E, Quartuccio N, Rossi B, Rubini G, Sollini M, Versari A, Signore A. State of the art of 18F-FDG PET/CT application in inflammation and infection: a guide for image acquisition and interpretation. Clin Transl Imaging 2021; 9:299-339. [PMID: 34277510 PMCID: PMC8271312 DOI: 10.1007/s40336-021-00445-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM The diagnosis, severity and extent of a sterile inflammation or a septic infection could be challenging since there is not one single test able to achieve an accurate diagnosis. The clinical use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging in the assessment of inflammation and infection is increasing worldwide. The purpose of this paper is to achieve an Italian consensus document on [18F]FDG PET/CT or PET/MRI in inflammatory and infectious diseases, such as osteomyelitis (OM), prosthetic joint infections (PJI), infective endocarditis (IE), prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), cardiac implantable electronic device infections (CIEDI), systemic and cardiac sarcoidosis (SS/CS), diabetic foot (DF), fungal infections (FI), tuberculosis (TBC), fever and inflammation of unknown origin (FUO/IUO), pediatric infections (PI), inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), spine infections (SI), vascular graft infections (VGI), large vessel vasculitis (LVV), retroperitoneal fibrosis (RF) and COVID-19 infections. METHODS In September 2020, the inflammatory and infectious diseases focus group (IIFG) of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) proposed to realize a procedural paper about the clinical applications of [18F]FDG PET/CT or PET/MRI in inflammatory and infectious diseases. The project was carried out thanks to the collaboration of 13 Italian nuclear medicine centers, with a consolidate experience in this field. With the endorsement of AIMN, IIFG contacted each center, and the pediatric diseases focus group (PDFC). IIFG provided for each team involved, a draft with essential information regarding the execution of [18F]FDG PET/CT or PET/MRI scan (i.e., indications, patient preparation, standard or specific acquisition modalities, interpretation criteria, reporting methods, pitfalls and artifacts), by limiting the literature research to the last 20 years. Moreover, some clinical cases were required from each center, to underline the teaching points. Time for the collection of each report was from October to December 2020. RESULTS Overall, we summarized 291 scientific papers and guidelines published between 1998 and 2021. Papers were divided in several sub-topics and summarized in the following paragraphs: clinical indications, image interpretation criteria, future perspectivess and new trends (for each single disease), while patient preparation, image acquisition, possible pitfalls and reporting modalities were described afterwards. Moreover, a specific section was dedicated to pediatric and PET/MRI indications. A collection of images was described for each indication. CONCLUSIONS Currently, [18F]FDG PET/CT in oncology is globally accepted and standardized in main diagnostic algorithms for neoplasms. In recent years, the ever-closer collaboration among different European associations has tried to overcome the absence of a standardization also in the field of inflammation and infections. The collaboration of several nuclear medicine centers with a long experience in this field, as well as among different AIMN focus groups represents a further attempt in this direction. We hope that this document will be the basis for a "common nuclear physicians' language" throughout all the country. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40336-021-00445-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimiliano Casali
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Chiara Lauri
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Corinna Altini
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Bertagna
- Nuclear Medicine, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Gianluca Cassarino
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Anna Paola Erba
- Regional Center of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Translational Research and Advanced Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Cristina Ferrari
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Palucci
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, “Ospedali Riuniti di Torrette” Hospital, Ancona, Italy
| | - Napoleone Prandini
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Centro Diagnostico Italiano, Milan, Italy
| | - Sergio Baldari
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and of Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Francesco Bartoli
- Regional Center of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Translational Research and Advanced Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Mirco Bartolomei
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialists Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Adriana D’Antonio
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Dondi
- Nuclear Medicine, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Patrizia Gandolfo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Centro Diagnostico Italiano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessia Giordano
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Riccardo Laudicella
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and of Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Nieri
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialists Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | | | - Laura Vendramin
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Francesco Muratore
- Rheumatology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Valentina Lavelli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Domenico Albano
- Nuclear Medicine, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Burroni
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, “Ospedali Riuniti di Torrette” Hospital, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alberto Cuocolo
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Elena Lazzeri
- Regional Center of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Translational Research and Advanced Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Natale Quartuccio
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, A.R.N.A.S. Civico di Cristina and Benfratelli Hospitals, Palermo, Italy
| | - Brunella Rossi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Services, ASUR MARCHE-AV5, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Rubini
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Martina Sollini
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Annibale Versari
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Alberto Signore
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Elhalawani H, Cardenas CE, Volpe S, Barua S, Stieb S, Rock CB, Lin T, Yang P, Wu H, Zaveri J, Elgohari B, Abdallah LE, Jethanandani A, Mohamed ASR, Court LE, Hutcheson KA, Brandon Gunn G, Rosenthal DI, Frank SJ, Garden AS, Rao A, Fuller CD. 18FDG positron emission tomography mining for metabolic imaging biomarkers of radiation-induced xerostomia in patients with oropharyngeal cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 29:93-101. [PMID: 34195391 PMCID: PMC8239739 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Head and neck cancers radiotherapy (RT) is associated with inevitable injury to parotid glands and subsequent xerostomia. We investigated the utility of SUV derived from 18FDG-PET to develop metabolic imaging biomarkers (MIBs) of RT-related parotid injury. Methods Data for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients treated with RT at our institution between 2005 and 2015 with available planning computed tomography (CT), dose grid, pre- & first post-RT 18FDG-PET-CT scans, and physician-reported xerostomia assessment at 3-6 months post-RT (Xero 3-6 ms) per CTCAE, was retrieved, following an IRB approval. A CT-CT deformable image co-registration followed by voxel-by-voxel resampling of pre & post-RT 18FDG activity and dose grid were performed. Ipsilateral (Ipsi) and contralateral (contra) parotid glands were sub-segmented based on the received dose in 5 Gy increments, i.e. 0-5 Gy, 5-10 Gy sub-volumes, etc. Median and dose-weighted SUV were extracted from whole parotid volumes and sub-volumes on pre- & post-RT PET scans, using in-house code that runs on MATLAB. Wilcoxon signed-rank and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to test differences pre- and post-RT. Results 432 parotid glands, belonging to 108 OPC patients treated with RT, were sub-segmented & analyzed. Xero 3-6 ms was reported as: non-severe (78.7%) and severe (21.3%). SUV- median values were significantly reduced post-RT, irrespective of laterality (p = 0.02). A similar pattern was observed in parotid sub-volumes, especially ipsi parotid gland sub-volumes receiving doses 10-50 Gy (p < 0.05). Kruskal-Wallis test showed a significantly higher mean RT dose in the contra parotid in the patients with more severe Xero 3-6mo (p = 0.03). Multiple logistic regression showed a combined clinical-dosimetric-metabolic imaging model could predict the severity of Xero 3-6mo; AUC = 0.78 (95%CI: 0.66-0.85; p < 0.0001). Conclusion We sought to quantify pre- and post-RT 18FDG-PET metrics of parotid glands in patients with OPC. Temporal dynamics of PET-derived metrics can potentially serve as MIBs of RT-related xerostomia in concert with clinical and dosimetric variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hesham Elhalawani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Carlos E Cardenas
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Souptik Barua
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Sonja Stieb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Calvin B Rock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Timothy Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Pei Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.,Key Laboratory of Translational Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Xiangya Medical School, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Haijun Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jhankruti Zaveri
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Speech Pathology and Audiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Baher Elgohari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Clinical Oncology & Nuclear Oncology, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Lamiaa E Abdallah
- Department of Clinical Oncology & Nuclear Oncology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Amit Jethanandani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Abdallah S R Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Laurence E Court
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Katherine A Hutcheson
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Speech Pathology and Audiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Arvind Rao
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.,Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Peisen F, Thaiss WM, Ekert K, Horger M, Amend B, Bedke J, Nikolaou K, Kaufmann S. Retroperitoneal Fibrosis and its Differential Diagnoses: The Role of Radiological Imaging. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2020; 192:929-936. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1181-9205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Background Retroperitoneal fibrosis is a rare disease with an incidence of 0–1/100 000 inhabitants per year and is associated with chronic inflammatory fibrosis of the retroperitoneum and the abdominal aorta. This article sheds light on the role of radiological imaging in retroperitoneal fibrosis, names various differential diagnoses and provides an overview of drug and surgical treatment options.
Methods A literature search for the keywords “retroperitoneal fibrosis” and “Ormond’s disease” was carried out in the PubMed database between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2019 (n = 1806). Mainly original papers were selected, but also reviews, in English and German language, with a focus on publications in the last 10 years, without excluding older publications that the authors believe are relevant to the topic discussed in the review (n = 40).
Results and Conclusion Ormond’s disease is a rare but important differential diagnosis for nonspecific back and flank pain. Imaging diagnostics using CT or MRI show a retroperitoneal mass, which must be differentiated from lymphoma, sarcoma, multiple myeloma and Erdheim-Chester disease. Patients have an excellent prognosis under adequate therapy. FDG-PET/CT or FDG-PET/MRT should be considered as potential modalities, as hybrid imaging can evaluate both the morphological changes and the inflammation.
Key Points:
Citation Format
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Peisen
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Maximilian Thaiss
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Kaspar Ekert
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marius Horger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Bastian Amend
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jens Bedke
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Konstantin Nikolaou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sascha Kaufmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kamper L, Dreger NM, Brandt AS, Pöppel T, Abanador-Kamper N, Roth S, Haage P. Diffusion-weighted MRI and PET–CT in the follow up of chronic periaortitis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018; 34:1779-1785. [DOI: 10.1007/s10554-018-1395-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
10
|
Bailey DL, Pichler BJ, Gückel B, Antoch G, Barthel H, Bhujwalla ZM, Biskup S, Biswal S, Bitzer M, Boellaard R, Braren RF, Brendle C, Brindle K, Chiti A, la Fougère C, Gillies R, Goh V, Goyen M, Hacker M, Heukamp L, Knudsen GM, Krackhardt AM, Law I, Morris JC, Nikolaou K, Nuyts J, Ordonez AA, Pantel K, Quick HH, Riklund K, Sabri O, Sattler B, Troost EGC, Zaiss M, Zender L, Beyer T. Combined PET/MRI: Global Warming-Summary Report of the 6th International Workshop on PET/MRI, March 27-29, 2017, Tübingen, Germany. Mol Imaging Biol 2018; 20:4-20. [PMID: 28971346 PMCID: PMC5775351 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-017-1123-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The 6th annual meeting to address key issues in positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was held again in Tübingen, Germany, from March 27 to 29, 2017. Over three days of invited plenary lectures, round table discussions and dialogue board deliberations, participants critically assessed the current state of PET/MRI, both clinically and as a research tool, and attempted to chart future directions. The meeting addressed the use of PET/MRI and workflows in oncology, neurosciences, infection, inflammation and chronic pain syndromes, as well as deeper discussions about how best to characterise the tumour microenvironment, optimise the complementary information available from PET and MRI, and how advanced data mining and bioinformatics, as well as information from liquid biomarkers (circulating tumour cells and nucleic acids) and pathology, can be integrated to give a more complete characterisation of disease phenotype. Some issues that have dominated previous meetings, such as the accuracy of MR-based attenuation correction (AC) of the PET scan, were finally put to rest as having been adequately addressed for the majority of clinical situations. Likewise, the ability to standardise PET systems for use in multicentre trials was confirmed, thus removing a perceived barrier to larger clinical imaging trials. The meeting openly questioned whether PET/MRI should, in all cases, be used as a whole-body imaging modality or whether in many circumstances it would best be employed to give an in-depth study of previously identified disease in a single organ or region. The meeting concluded that there is still much work to be done in the integration of data from different fields and in developing a common language for all stakeholders involved. In addition, the participants advocated joint training and education for individuals who engage in routine PET/MRI. It was agreed that PET/MRI can enhance our understanding of normal and disrupted biology, and we are in a position to describe the in vivo nature of disease processes, metabolism, evolution of cancer and the monitoring of response to pharmacological interventions and therapies. As such, PET/MRI is a key to advancing medicine and patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D L Bailey
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - B J Pichler
- Werner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany
| | - B Gückel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - G Antoch
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - H Barthel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Z M Bhujwalla
- Division of Cancer Imaging Research, Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - S Biskup
- Praxis für Humangenetik Tübingen, Paul-Ehrlich-Str. 23, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - S Biswal
- Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) and Bio-X, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - M Bitzer
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - R Boellaard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R F Braren
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - C Brendle
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - K Brindle
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1GA, UK
| | - A Chiti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - C la Fougère
- Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany
| | - R Gillies
- Department of Cancer Imaging and Metabolism, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33621, USA
| | - V Goh
- Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Radiology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals London, London, UK
| | - M Goyen
- GE Healthcare GmbH, Beethovenstrasse 239, Solingen, Germany
| | - M Hacker
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - G M Knudsen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Rigshospitalet and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A M Krackhardt
- III. Medical Department, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - I Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - J C Morris
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - K Nikolaou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - J Nuyts
- Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A A Ordonez
- Department of Pediatrics, Center for Infection and Inflammation Imaging Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - K Pantel
- Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - H H Quick
- High Field and Hybrid MR Imaging, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Erwin L. Hahn Institute for MR Imaging, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - K Riklund
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Umea University, Umea, Sweden
| | - O Sabri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - B Sattler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - E G C Troost
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany
- Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Medical Faculty of Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - M Zaiss
- High Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
| | - L Zender
- Department of Internal Medicine VIII, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Beyer
- QIMP Group, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering General Hospital Vienna, Medical University Vienna, 4L, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Grozdic Milojevic IT, Milojevic B, Sobic-Saranovic DP, Artiko VM. Impact of hybrid molecular imaging in retroperitoneal fibrosis: a systematic review. Rheumatol Int 2017; 38:179-187. [PMID: 28840309 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-017-3798-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2017] [Accepted: 08/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this article was to critically assess the usefulness of hybrid molecular imaging (FDG PET/CT and FDG PET/MR) procedures in the evaluation of inflammatory activity in retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF). A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed without timeline restriction and using the following keywords: retroperitoneal fibrosis, disease activity, diagnostic techniques, PET/CT, PET/MR. We evaluated full text articles written in the English language. Case reports, review articles or editorials and articles not in the field of interest of this review were excluded. Nine articles comprising a total of 186 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included and described in this systematic review. The new hybrid molecular imaging methods give promising results in the evaluation of the activity of the disease, quantification and prediction of therapeutic response and in tailoring medical therapy in RPF. FDG PET/CT can be a valuable tool in detecting disease activity, particularly in asymptomatic patients with RPF with acute phase reactant increase. Hybrid imaging can predict therapy response outcome and the best time for stent removal. Although PET/MR has potential advantage in small lesions and has reduced radiation exposure in comparison to PET/CT, PET quantification parameters have potentially higher diagnostic value over MR parameters in the evaluation of RPF. Acute phase reactants alone may not be reliable for the management and follow-up assessment of the disease. Hybrid imaging in RFP could be more comfortable, more accurate, with less radiation burden than different separate imaging studies acquired at different points in time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isidora T Grozdic Milojevic
- Center for Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Visegradska 26, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia. .,Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
| | - Bogomir Milojevic
- Clinic of Urology, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Dragana P Sobic-Saranovic
- Center for Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Visegradska 26, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Vera M Artiko
- Center for Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Visegradska 26, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Brandt AS, Dreger NM, Müller E, Kukuk S, Roth S. Neue (und alte) Aspekte der retroperitonealen Fibrose. Urologe A 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s00120-017-0428-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
13
|
Rossi GM, Rocco R, Accorsi Buttini E, Marvisi C, Vaglio A. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis and its overlap with IgG4-related disease. Intern Emerg Med 2017; 12:287-299. [PMID: 28070877 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-016-1599-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2016] [Accepted: 12/27/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is a rare disease characterised by fibrous tissue proliferation in the retroperitoneum, with encasement of the ureters and large vessels of the abdomen as the most destructive of potentially severe complications. It can either be idiopathic, or secondary to infections, malignancies, or the use of certain drugs. The idiopathic form accounts for approximately 75% of the cases, and is usually responsive to immunosuppressive therapy. In recent years, the emergence of a new clinical entity, IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD), shed light on many fibro-inflammatory disorders once thought to be separate clinical entities, although frequently associated in the so-called multifocal fibrosclerosis. Among these, together with sclerosing pancreatitis and cholangitis, pseudotumour of the orbit, idiopathic mediastinal fibrosis and other conditions, is idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (IRF). Both IRF and IgG4-RD can be associated with a wide variety of disorders, usually governed by immune-mediated (and particularly auto-immune) mechanisms. In our review, we discuss the clinical and therapeutic challenges IRF presents to the internist, as well as the meaning of its recent inclusion in the IgG4-RD spectrum from a clinical practice standpoint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rossana Rocco
- Nephrology Unit, Parma University Hospital, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Marvisi
- Nephrology Unit, Parma University Hospital, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy
| | - Augusto Vaglio
- Nephrology Unit, Parma University Hospital, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Querellou S, Robin P, Abgral R, Devauchelle V, De Moreuil C, Salaun P, Le Roux P, Le Duc-Pennec A. Review article: FDG-PET in inflammatory diseases. MÉDECINE NUCLÉAIRE 2017; 41:3-14. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mednuc.2016.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
|