1
|
Guo R, Yan S, Wang F, Su H, Xie Q, Zhao W, Yang Z, Li N, Yu J. A novel diagnostic model for differentiation of lung metastasis from primary lung cancer in patients with colorectal cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1017618. [PMID: 36353559 PMCID: PMC9639374 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1017618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to evaluate the 18F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating lung metastasis(LM) from primary lung cancer(LC) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods A total of 120 CRC patients (80 male, 40 female) who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT were included. The diagnosis of primary lung cancer or lung metastasis was based on histopathology The patients were divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort randomized 1:1. Independent risk factors were extracted through the clinical information and 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging characteristics of patients in the validation cohort, and then a diagnostic model was constructed and a nomograms was made. ROC curve, calibration curve, cutoff, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were used to evaluate the prediction performance of the diagnostic model. Results One hundred and twenty Indeterminate lung lesions (ILLs) (77 lung metastasis, 43 primary lung cancer) were analyzed. No significant difference in clinical characteristics and imaging features between the training and the validation cohorts (P > 0. 05). Using uni-/multivariate analysis, pleural tags and contour were identified as independent predictors. These independent predictors were used to establish a diagnostic model with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.92 and 0.89 in the primary and validation cohorts, respectively. The accuracy rate of the diagnostic model for differentiating LM from LC were higher than that of subjective diagnosis (P < 0.05). Conclusions Pleural tags and contour were identified as independent predictors. The diagnostic model of ILLs in patients with CRC could help differentiate between LM and LC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Guo
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education, Beijing), National Medical Products Administration (NPMA) Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals (National Medical Products Administration), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Shi Yan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Thoracic Surgery II, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Fei Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education, Beijing), National Medical Products Administration (NPMA) Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals (National Medical Products Administration), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Hua Su
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education, Beijing), National Medical Products Administration (NPMA) Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals (National Medical Products Administration), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Qing Xie
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education, Beijing), National Medical Products Administration (NPMA) Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals (National Medical Products Administration), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Zhao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education, Beijing), National Medical Products Administration (NPMA) Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals (National Medical Products Administration), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Zhi Yang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education, Beijing), National Medical Products Administration (NPMA) Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals (National Medical Products Administration), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Zhi Yang, ; Nan Li, ; Jiangyuan Yu,
| | - Nan Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education, Beijing), National Medical Products Administration (NPMA) Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals (National Medical Products Administration), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Zhi Yang, ; Nan Li, ; Jiangyuan Yu,
| | - Jiangyuan Yu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education, Beijing), National Medical Products Administration (NPMA) Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals (National Medical Products Administration), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Zhi Yang, ; Nan Li, ; Jiangyuan Yu,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
International colon cancer guidelines suggest F-FDG PET/CT in a few circumstances: (1) at disease presentation in case of suspected or proven metastatic synchronous adenocarcinoma; (2) in the workup of recurrent colon cancer with metachronous metastases documented by CT, MRI, or biopsy and in case of serial CEA elevation with negative colonoscopy and negative CT; and (3) in case of contraindication to iodine- and gadolinium-based contrast agents. However, review of the literature has shown that PET/CT can also be used in other scenarios with significant levels of diagnostic advantage. This review aims to emphasize differences between guidelines and scientific literature for the use of PET/CT in colon cancer.
Collapse
|
3
|
Lung metastasectomy after colorectal cancer: prognostic impact of resection margin on long term survival, a retrospective cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:9-18. [PMID: 31686201 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03386-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pulmonary metastasectomy is considered a potentially curative treatment for selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Several prognostic factors have been analysed, but to date, it is still not well defined which is the optimal resection margin during lung metastasectomy (LM). This study analyses the long-term results and prognostic factors after LM in CRC patients with particular attention to the resection margins. Primary endpoint of this study is to assess the correlation between resection margins and long-term outcomes. METHODS Observational cohort study on all proven cases of CRC lung metastases (2000-2016) resected with curative intent in a single centre. RESULTS The series included 210 consecutive patients (M/F 133/77) with a mean age of 65.4 (± 9.96) years, 75% (159/210) of them with a solitary metastasis. Mean size of metastasis was 2.57 cm (± 1.45). One hundred sixty-eight patients underwent wedge resections (80%) and lymphadenectomy was carried out in 90 cases (42.9%). With a mean follow-up of 56 months (range 5-192), we observed a 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) of 95%, 74% and 54%, respectively. The patients were divided into three groups according to the resection margin distance from the tumour: (a) ≥ 2 cm (145 cases); (b) < 2, ≥ 1 cm (37 cases); and (c) < 1 cm (12 cases). The OS was significantly different between the three groups (p = 0,020); univariate and multivariate analyses showed that a narrow resection margin was an independent prognostic factor of worse survival (p = 0.006 and HR 3.4 p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS Long-term survival of patients after LM is strongly associated with a greater distance between the lesion and the resection margin.
Collapse
|
4
|
Pellino G, Gallo G, Pallante P, Capasso R, De Stefano A, Maretto I, Malapelle U, Qiu S, Nikolaou S, Barina A, Clerico G, Reginelli A, Giuliani A, Sciaudone G, Kontovounisios C, Brunese L, Trompetto M, Selvaggi F. Noninvasive Biomarkers of Colorectal Cancer: Role in Diagnosis and Personalised Treatment Perspectives. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2018; 2018:2397863. [PMID: 30008744 PMCID: PMC6020538 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2397863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2017] [Revised: 04/03/2018] [Accepted: 04/15/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. It has been estimated that more than one-third of patients are diagnosed when CRC has already spread to the lymph nodes. One out of five patients is diagnosed with metastatic CRC. The stage of diagnosis influences treatment outcome and survival. Notwithstanding the recent advances in multidisciplinary management and treatment of CRC, patients are still reluctant to undergo screening tests because of the associated invasiveness and discomfort (e.g., colonoscopy with biopsies). Moreover, the serological markers currently used for diagnosis are not reliable and, even if they were useful to detect disease recurrence after treatment, they are not always detected in patients with CRC (e.g., CEA). Recently, translational research in CRC has produced a wide spectrum of potential biomarkers that could be useful for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of these patients. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the newer noninvasive or minimally invasive biomarkers of CRC. Here, we discuss imaging and biomolecular diagnostics ranging from their potential usefulness to obtain early and less-invasive diagnosis to their potential implementation in the development of a bespoke treatment of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Pellino
- Unit of General Surgery, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Ageing Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138 Naples, Italy
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Gaetano Gallo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, OU of General Surgery, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Clinic S. Rita, Vercelli, Italy
| | - Pierlorenzo Pallante
- Institute of Experimental Endocrinology and Oncology (IEOS), National Research Council (CNR), Via S. Pansini 5, Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaella Capasso
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Via Francesco de Sanctis 1, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Alfonso De Stefano
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Abdominal Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, “Fondazione G. Pascale, ” IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Isacco Maretto
- 1st Surgical Clinic, Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Umberto Malapelle
- Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Shengyang Qiu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Stella Nikolaou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Andrea Barina
- 1st Surgical Clinic, Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Clerico
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Clinic S. Rita, Vercelli, Italy
| | - Alfonso Reginelli
- Department of Internal and Experimental Medicine, Magrassi-Lanzara, Institute of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Giuliani
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Guido Sciaudone
- Unit of General Surgery, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Ageing Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Christos Kontovounisios
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Luca Brunese
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Via Francesco de Sanctis 1, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Mario Trompetto
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Clinic S. Rita, Vercelli, Italy
| | - Francesco Selvaggi
- Unit of General Surgery, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Ageing Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
García-Figueiras R, Baleato-González S, Padhani AR, Luna-Alcalá A, Marhuenda A, Vilanova JC, Osorio-Vázquez I, Martínez-de-Alegría A, Gómez-Caamaño A. Advanced Imaging Techniques in Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer. Radiographics 2018; 38:740-765. [PMID: 29676964 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018170044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Imaging techniques are clinical decision-making tools in the evaluation of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this article is to discuss the potential of recent advances in imaging for diagnosis, prognosis, therapy planning, and assessment of response to treatment of CRC. Recent developments and new clinical applications of conventional imaging techniques such as virtual colonoscopy, dual-energy spectral computed tomography, elastography, advanced computing techniques (including volumetric rendering techniques and machine learning), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-based magnetization transfer, and new liver imaging techniques, which may offer additional clinical information in patients with CRC, are summarized. In addition, the clinical value of functional and molecular imaging techniques such as diffusion-weighted MR imaging, dynamic contrast material-enhanced imaging, blood oxygen level-dependent imaging, lymphography with contrast agents, positron emission tomography with different radiotracers, and MR spectroscopy is reviewed, and the advantages and disadvantages of these modalities are evaluated. Finally, the future role of imaging-based analysis of tumor heterogeneity and multiparametric imaging, the development of radiomics and radiogenomics, and future challenges for imaging of patients with CRC are discussed. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto García-Figueiras
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.G.F., S.B.G., I.O.V., A.M.d.A.) and Radiation Oncology (A.G.C.), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England (A.R.P.); Health Time, Jaén, Spain (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, IVO (Instituto Valenciano de Oncología), Valencia, Spain (A.M.); and Department of Radiology, Clínica Girona and IDI, Girona, Spain (J.C.V.)
| | - Sandra Baleato-González
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.G.F., S.B.G., I.O.V., A.M.d.A.) and Radiation Oncology (A.G.C.), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England (A.R.P.); Health Time, Jaén, Spain (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, IVO (Instituto Valenciano de Oncología), Valencia, Spain (A.M.); and Department of Radiology, Clínica Girona and IDI, Girona, Spain (J.C.V.)
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.G.F., S.B.G., I.O.V., A.M.d.A.) and Radiation Oncology (A.G.C.), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England (A.R.P.); Health Time, Jaén, Spain (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, IVO (Instituto Valenciano de Oncología), Valencia, Spain (A.M.); and Department of Radiology, Clínica Girona and IDI, Girona, Spain (J.C.V.)
| | - Antonio Luna-Alcalá
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.G.F., S.B.G., I.O.V., A.M.d.A.) and Radiation Oncology (A.G.C.), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England (A.R.P.); Health Time, Jaén, Spain (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, IVO (Instituto Valenciano de Oncología), Valencia, Spain (A.M.); and Department of Radiology, Clínica Girona and IDI, Girona, Spain (J.C.V.)
| | - Ana Marhuenda
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.G.F., S.B.G., I.O.V., A.M.d.A.) and Radiation Oncology (A.G.C.), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England (A.R.P.); Health Time, Jaén, Spain (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, IVO (Instituto Valenciano de Oncología), Valencia, Spain (A.M.); and Department of Radiology, Clínica Girona and IDI, Girona, Spain (J.C.V.)
| | - Joan C Vilanova
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.G.F., S.B.G., I.O.V., A.M.d.A.) and Radiation Oncology (A.G.C.), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England (A.R.P.); Health Time, Jaén, Spain (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, IVO (Instituto Valenciano de Oncología), Valencia, Spain (A.M.); and Department of Radiology, Clínica Girona and IDI, Girona, Spain (J.C.V.)
| | - Iria Osorio-Vázquez
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.G.F., S.B.G., I.O.V., A.M.d.A.) and Radiation Oncology (A.G.C.), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England (A.R.P.); Health Time, Jaén, Spain (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, IVO (Instituto Valenciano de Oncología), Valencia, Spain (A.M.); and Department of Radiology, Clínica Girona and IDI, Girona, Spain (J.C.V.)
| | - Anxo Martínez-de-Alegría
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.G.F., S.B.G., I.O.V., A.M.d.A.) and Radiation Oncology (A.G.C.), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England (A.R.P.); Health Time, Jaén, Spain (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, IVO (Instituto Valenciano de Oncología), Valencia, Spain (A.M.); and Department of Radiology, Clínica Girona and IDI, Girona, Spain (J.C.V.)
| | - Antonio Gómez-Caamaño
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.G.F., S.B.G., I.O.V., A.M.d.A.) and Radiation Oncology (A.G.C.), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England (A.R.P.); Health Time, Jaén, Spain (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, IVO (Instituto Valenciano de Oncología), Valencia, Spain (A.M.); and Department of Radiology, Clínica Girona and IDI, Girona, Spain (J.C.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cho A, Jo K, Hwang SH, Lee N, Jung M, Yun M, Hwang HS. Correlation between KRAS mutation and 18F-FDG uptake in stage IV colorectal cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42:1621-1626. [PMID: 28161825 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1054-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to evaluate the correlation between KRAS mutation, 18F-FDG uptake, and metastatic pattern in advanced stage colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. METHODS Medical records of stage IV CRC patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging and KRAS mutation analysis were selected. On PET scans, a volume of interest (VOI) was drawn on the primary lesion. 18F-FDG indices (SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, TLG) of the primary lesions were obtained and correlated with KRAS mutation of the primary lesion. Also, metastatic sites were recorded. Association between metastatic pattern and KRAS expression and FDG indices were analyzed. RESULTS KRAS mutation was positive in 40 (43%) patients. Evaluation of FDG indices showed that higher SUVmax (14.0 vs. 11.2, p = 0.004), higher SUVmean (5.3 vs. 4.7, p = 0.005), and higher TLG (301.4 vs. 205.5, p = 0.023) were predictive of KRAS mutation compared to wild-type (WT) KRAS. Lung metastasis was more frequently involved in patients with KRAS mutation (50.0% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.006), and liver metastasis was more frequently involved in patients with WT KRAS (81.1% vs. 55.0%, p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis showed that primary tumor location (OR 3.92, p = 0.07) and KRAS mutation (OR 2.45, p = 0.09) were significant factors in lung metastasis model. CONCLUSION KRAS mutation patients had more frequent lung metastasis and had higher 18F-FDG uptake compared to WT KRAS in stage IV CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Cho
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwanhyeong Jo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Hyun Hwang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Narae Lee
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Minkyu Jung
- Division of Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mijin Yun
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee Sung Hwang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 22 Gwanpyeong-ro 170 beon-gil, Dongan-Gu, Anyang, 14068, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Torres OJM, Marques MC, Santos FN, Farias ICD, Coutinho AK, Oliveira CVCD, Kalil AN, Mello CALD, Kruger JAP, Fernandes GDS, Quireze C, Murad AM, Silva MJDBE, Zurstrassen CE, Freitas HC, Cruz MR, Weschenfelder R, Linhares MM, Castro LDS, Vollmer C, Dixon E, Ribeiro HSDC, Coimbra FJF. BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS FOR MULTIMODAL TREATMENT OF COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES. MODULE 3: CONTROVERSIES AND UNRESECTABLE METASTASES. ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA 2017; 29:173-179. [PMID: 27759781 PMCID: PMC5074669 DOI: 10.1590/0102-6720201600030011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2016] [Accepted: 04/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
In the last module of this consensus, controversial topics were discussed. Management of the disease after progression during first line chemotherapy was the first discussion. Next, the benefits of liver resection in the presence of extra-hepatic disease were debated, as soon as, the best sequence of treatment. Conversion chemotherapy in the presence of unresectable liver disease was also discussed in this module. Lastly, the approach to the unresectable disease was also discussed, focusing in the best chemotherapy regimens and hole of chemo-embolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orlando Jorge Martins Torres
- Brazilian Chapter of the International Hepato-Pancreato Biliary Association (BC-IHPBA).,Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (BSSO).,Brazilian Society of Clinical Oncology (BSCO)
| | - Márcio Carmona Marques
- Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (BSSO).,Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association - AHPBA
| | - Fabio Nasser Santos
- Brazilian Chapter of the International Hepato-Pancreato Biliary Association (BC-IHPBA)
| | - Igor Correia de Farias
- Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (BSSO).,Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association - AHPBA
| | | | - Cássio Virgílio Cavalcante de Oliveira
- Brazilian Chapter of the International Hepato-Pancreato Biliary Association (BC-IHPBA).,Brazilian College of Digestive Surgery (BCDS).,Brazilian College of Surgeons (BCS)
| | - Antonio Nocchi Kalil
- Brazilian Chapter of the International Hepato-Pancreato Biliary Association (BC-IHPBA).,Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (BSSO).,Brazilian College of Digestive Surgery (BCDS).,Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association - AHPBA
| | | | - Jaime Arthur Pirola Kruger
- Brazilian Chapter of the International Hepato-Pancreato Biliary Association (BC-IHPBA).,Brazilian College of Digestive Surgery (BCDS).,Brazilian College of Surgeons (BCS).,Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association - AHPBA
| | | | - Claudemiro Quireze
- Brazilian Chapter of the International Hepato-Pancreato Biliary Association (BC-IHPBA).,Brazilian College of Digestive Surgery (BCDS).,Brazilian College of Surgeons (BCS).,Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association - AHPBA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marcelo Moura Linhares
- Brazilian Chapter of the International Hepato-Pancreato Biliary Association (BC-IHPBA).,Brazilian College of Digestive Surgery (BCDS).,Brazilian College of Surgeons (BCS).,Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association - AHPBA
| | - Leonaldson Dos Santos Castro
- Brazilian Chapter of the International Hepato-Pancreato Biliary Association (BC-IHPBA).,Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (BSSO).,Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association - AHPBA
| | | | - Elijah Dixon
- Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association - AHPBA
| | - Héber Salvador de Castro Ribeiro
- Brazilian Chapter of the International Hepato-Pancreato Biliary Association (BC-IHPBA).,Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (BSSO).,Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association - AHPBA
| | - Felipe José Fernandez Coimbra
- Brazilian Chapter of the International Hepato-Pancreato Biliary Association (BC-IHPBA).,Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (BSSO).,Brazilian College of Surgeons (BCS).,Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association - AHPBA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Van Cutsem E, Verheul HMW, Flamen P, Rougier P, Beets-Tan R, Glynne-Jones R, Seufferlein T. Imaging in Colorectal Cancer: Progress and Challenges for the Clinicians. Cancers (Basel) 2016; 8:cancers8090081. [PMID: 27589804 PMCID: PMC5040983 DOI: 10.3390/cancers8090081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2016] [Revised: 08/22/2016] [Accepted: 08/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of imaging in colorectal cancer (CRC) has significantly evolved over the last twenty years, establishing important roles in surveillance, diagnosis, staging, treatment selection and follow up. The range of modalities has broadened with the development of novel tracer and contrast agents, and the fusion of technologies such as positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT). Traditionally, the most widely used modality for assessing treatment response in metastasised colon and rectal tumours is CT, combined with use of the RECIST guidelines. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that tumour size does not always adequately correlate with clinical outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a more versatile technique and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI and diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI may be used to evaluate biological and functional effects of treatment. Integrated fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT combines metabolic and anatomical imaging to improve sensitivity and specificity of tumour detection, and a number of studies have demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy of this modality in a variety of tumour types, including CRC. These developments have enabled the progression of treatment strategies in rectal cancer and improved the detection of hepatic metastatic disease, yet are not without their limitations. These include technical, economical and logistical challenges, along with a lack of robust evidence for standardisation and formal guidance. In order to successfully apply these novel imaging techniques and utilise their benefit to provide truly personalised cancer care, advances need to be clinically realised in a routine and robust manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Van Cutsem
- Department of Gastroenterology/Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Division of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Centre, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Patrik Flamen
- Nuclear Medicine Imaging and Therapy Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Philippe Rougier
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, European Hospital, Georges Pompidou, 75015 Paris, France.
| | - Regina Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Rob Glynne-Jones
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, HA6 2RN Middlesex, UK.
| | - Thomas Seufferlein
- Clinic of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fang S, Fang X. Advances in glucose metabolism research in colorectal cancer. Biomed Rep 2016; 5:289-295. [PMID: 27602209 PMCID: PMC4998148 DOI: 10.3892/br.2016.719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2016] [Accepted: 07/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer cells uptake glucose at a higher rate and produce lactic acid rather than metabolizing pyruvate through the tricarboxylic acid cycle. This adaptive metabolic shift is termed the Warburg effect. Recently progress had been made regarding the mechanistic understanding of glucose metabolism and associated diagnostic and therapeutic methods, which have been investigated in colorectal cancer. The majority of novel mechanisms involve important glucose metabolism associated genes and miRNA regulation. The present review discusses the contribution of these research results to facilitate with the development of novel diagnosis and anticancer treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sitian Fang
- Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of Zhejiang Province, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310016, P.R. China; Hangzhou No. 4 High School, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, P.R. China
| | - Xiao Fang
- Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of Zhejiang Province, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310016, P.R. China; Department of Anesthesiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310016, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Scarsbrook AF, Barrington SF. PET-CT in the UK: current status and future directions. Clin Radiol 2016; 71:673-90. [PMID: 27044903 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2016] [Revised: 02/25/2016] [Accepted: 02/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Combined positron-emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) has taken the oncological world by storm since being introduced into the clinical domain in the early 21(st) century and is firmly established in the management pathway of many different tumour types. Non-oncological applications of PET-CT represent a smaller but steadily growing area of interest. PET-CT continues to be the focus of a large number of research studies and keeping up-to-date with the literature is important but represents a challenge. Consequently guidelines recommending PET-CT usage need to be revised regularly to encompass new developments. The purpose of this article is twofold: first, it provides a detailed review of the evidence-base underpinning the major uses of PET-CT in clinical practice, which may be of value to a wide-range of individuals, including those directly involved with PET-CT and to a much larger group with limited exposure, but for whom a précis of the current state-of-play may help inform other radiology and multidisciplinary team (MDT) work; the second purpose is as a companion to revised guidelines on evidence-based indications for PET-CT in the UK (being published concurrently) providing a detailed commentary on new indications with a summary of emerging data supporting these additional clinical uses of the technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A F Scarsbrook
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Level 1, Bexley Wing, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
| | - S F Barrington
- PET Imaging Centre, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jung EJ, Kim SR, Ryu CG, Paik JH, Yi JG, Hwang DY. Indeterminate pulmonary nodules in colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:2967-2972. [PMID: 25780294 PMCID: PMC4356916 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i10.2967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2014] [Revised: 10/11/2014] [Accepted: 12/01/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the clinicopathologic parameters of pulmonary metastasis in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients after lung operation of indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs).
METHODS: From a prospective database of CRC patients, 40 cases that underwent lung operation between November 2008 and December 2012 for suspicious metastatic pulmonary nodules on chest computed tomography (CT) were enrolled. The decision to perform a lung operation was made if the patient met the following criteria: (1) completely resected or resectable primary CRC; (2) completely resectable IPNs; (3) controlled or controllable extrapulmonary metastasis; and (4) adequate general condition and pulmonary function to tolerate pulmonary operation. Lung operation was performed by a thoracic surgeon without CT-guided biopsy for pathologic confirmation.
RESULTS: A total of 40 cases of lung resection was performed in 29 patients. Five patients underwent repeated lung resection. The final pathology result showed metastasis from the CRC in 30 cases (75%) and benign pathology in 10 cases (25%). The primary tumor site was the rectum in 26/30 (86.6%) cases with pulmonary metastasis, but only 3/10 (30%) cases in the benign group had a primary rectal cancer (P = 0.001). Positron emission tomography (PET)-CT was performed for 22/30 (73.4%) patients in the lung metastasis group and for 6/10 (60.0%) patients in the benign group. PET-CT revealed hot uptake of 18fluorine 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose with all IPNs in both groups. The group with pulmonary metastasis had a higher incidence of primary rectal cancer (P = 0.001), a more advanced tumor stage (P = 0.011), and more frequent lymphatic invasion of tumor cells (P = 0.005). Six cases with previous liver metastasectomy were present in the lung metastasis group. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels before lung operation were not elevated in any of the patients.
CONCLUSION: The stage and location of the primary tumor and tumor cell infiltration of lymphatics provide useful indicators for deciding on lung resection of IPNs in CRC.
Collapse
|
12
|
Cacheux W, Lièvre A, Mariani P, Servois V, Farkhondeh F, Rouleau E, Buecher B, Petras S. Primary jejunal adenocarcinoma incidentally diagnosed on positron emission tomography/computed tomography in a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer: suspicion of Lynch syndrome and effect on therapeutic management. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31:e128-31. [PMID: 23341528 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.44.5833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Wulfran Cacheux
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75248 Paris Cedex 05, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|