Routine use of precontrast and delayed acquisitions in abdominal CT: time for change

Imaging of acute small bowel pathologies in oncology patients in the ER part I: the role of Computed Tomography (CT) for the evaluation of Tumor and infections

Acute abdominal complaints constitute up to 40% of all emergency department (ED) presentations in oncology patients due to a multitude of causes. Small bowel pathologies present a diagnostic challenge due to their diverse range and frequently overlapping clinical presentation. In oncology patients, structural changes resulting from tumor growth, surgery and treatment effects can further complicate the diagnostic process. Due to a weakened immune system, oncology patients are also highly susceptible to infections of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Traditional computed tomography (CT) scans are used as the gold standard diagnostic modality. However, three-dimensional (3D) postprocessing techniques including maximal intensity projection (MIP), volume rendering (VR) and cinematic rendering (CR) have been employed to aid image evaluation. For a balanced and organized approach to describe diagnostic challenges in this complex population, we have divided the pictorial essay into two parts. The first part focuses on tumor- and infection-associated causes, as summarized below in the visual abstract. The second part will address treatment-related complications, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, graft-versus-host disease and post-surgical complications.

Flank pain, hypertension, and hematuria: CT and 3D cinematic rendering in the evaluation of renal artery emergencies-a pictorial essay

Non-traumatic acute renal artery emergencies encompass a spectrum of etiologies, including renal artery stenosis, arteriovenous malformations, aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms, dissections, thrombosis, and vasculitis. Prompt and accurate diagnosis in the emergency setting is crucial due to the potential for significant morbidity and mortality. Computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography (CTA) are the mainstay imaging modalities, offering rapid acquisition and high diagnostic accuracy. The integration of 3D postprocessing techniques, such as 3D cinematic rendering (CR), improves the diagnostic workflow by providing photorealistic and anatomically accurate visualizations. This pictorial essay illustrates the diagnostic utility of CT and CTA, supplemented by 3D CR, through a series of 10 cases of non-traumatic renal artery emergencies. The added value of 3D CR in improving diagnostic confidence, surgical planning, and understanding of complex vascular anatomy is emphasized.

[Imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma : Reliable diagnosis according to the new S3 guideline]

The S3 guideline on hepatocellular carcinoma has been expanded to include malignant biliary carcinoma (synonym cholangiocarcinoma [CCA]). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with additional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is the imaging modality of choice to evaluate local findings. Use of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-based contrast agent increases its diagnostic value. Histologic confirmation is always required when diagnosing intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) because using imaging alone there is a risk of confusion with HCC subtypes.

Effects of Contrast Phases on Automated Measurements of Muscle Quantity and Quality Using CT

OBJECTIVE

Muscle quantity and quality can be measured with an automated system on CT. However, the effects of contrast phases on the muscle measurements have not been established, which we aimed to investigate in this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Muscle quantity was measured according to the skeletal muscle area (SMA) measured by a convolutional neural network-based automated system at the L3 level in 89 subjects undergoing multiphasic abdominal CT comprising unenhanced phase, arterial phase, portal venous phase (PVP), or delayed phase imaging. Muscle quality was analyzed using the mean muscle density and the muscle quality map, which comprises normal and low-attenuation muscle areas (NAMA and LAMA, respectively) based on the muscle attenuation threshold. The SMA, mean muscle density, NAMA, and LAMA were compared between PVP and other phases using paired t tests. Bland-Altman analysis was used to evaluate the inter-phase variability between PVP and other phases. Based on the cutoffs for low muscle quantity and quality, the counts of individuals who scored lower than the cutoff values were compared between PVP and other phases.

RESULTS

All indices showed significant differences between PVP and other phases (p < 0.001 for all). The SMA, mean muscle density, and NAMA increased during the later phases, whereas LAMA decreased during the later phases. Bland-Altman analysis showed that the mean differences between PVP and other phases ranged -2.1 to 0.3 cm² for SMA, -12.0 to 2.6 cm² for NAMA, and -2.2 to 9.9 cm² for LAMA.The number of patients who were categorized as low muscle quantity did not significant differ between PVP and other phases (p ≥ 0.5), whereas the number of patients with low muscle quality significantly differed (p ≤ 0.002).

CONCLUSION

SMA was less affected by the contrast phases. However, the muscle quality measurements changed with the contrast phases to greater extents and would require a standardization of the contrast phase for reliable measurement.

Tailored versus fixed scan delay in contrast-enhanced abdominal multi-detector CT: An intra-patient comparison of image quality

PURPOSE

To perform anintra-patient comparison betweena single-pass protocol (SP) and a portal venous phase (PVP) by means ofboth quantitative and qualitative analysis of image quality.

METHODS

Forty patients (31 M; 9F; aged 20-77 years; BMI 23 ± 4 Kg/m²) underwent both a SP and a PVP using a 64-rows multi-detector CT with a median interval time of 56 days (range5-903). All patients underwent i.v. bolus injection (2.0 cc/sec) of 1.7 cc/Kg of a non ionic iodinated contrast-media (370 mgI/ml) with scan delays of 67 ± 8 and 90 s for the SP and the PVP, respectively. Signal- (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated for most visceral organs and for both abdominal aorta (AA) and main portal vein (MPV). For qualitative analysis, reproduction of abdominal viscera and vascular structures was blindly evaluated and inter-observer agreement calculated by the weighted Cohen k-analysis.

RESULTS

Attenuation values (H.U.) of AA (232 ± 53vs180 ± 36) and MPV (215 ± 39vs187 ± 42) were significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the SP than in PVP, respectively. At qualitative analysis, reproduction of mostabdominal viscerawas also significantly sharper (p < 0.001) with the SP than the PVPwith inter-observer agreement scores (k)ranging from 0.60 to 0.88 for all but one imaging criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

As the SP resulted in a significantly higher vascular enhancement and in a sharper reproduction of most abdominal viscera, it may be better suited than a PVP for the CT evaluation of non traumatic acute abdomen.

Skeletal muscle fat quantification by dual-energy computed tomography in comparison with 3T MR imaging

Objectives

To quantify the proportion of fat within the skeletal muscle as a measure of muscle quality using dual-energy CT (DECT) and to validate this methodology with MRI.

Methods

Twenty-one patients with abdominal contrast-enhanced DECT scans (100 kV/Sn 150 kV) underwent abdominal 3-T MRI. The fat fraction (DECT-FF), determined by material decomposition, and HU values on virtual non-contrast-enhanced (VNC) DECT images were measured in 126 regions of interest (≥ 6 cm²) within the posterior paraspinal muscle. For validation, the MR-based fat fraction (MR-FF) was assessed by chemical shift relaxometry. Patients were categorized into groups of high or low skeletal muscle mean radiation attenuation (SMRA) and classified as either sarcopenic or non-sarcopenic, according to the skeletal muscle index (SMI) and cut-off values from non-contrast-enhanced single-energy CT. Spearman’s and intraclass correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, and mixed linear models were employed.

Results

The correlation was excellent between DECT-FF and MR-FF (r = 0.91), DECT VNC HU and MR-FF (r = - 0.90), and DECT-FF and DECT VNC HU (r = − 0.98). Intraclass correlation between DECT-FF and MR-FF was good (r = 0.83 [95% CI 0.71–0.90]), with a mean difference of - 0.15% (SD 3.32 [95% CI 6.35 to − 6.66]). Categorization using the SMRA yielded an eightfold difference in DECT VNC HU values between both groups (5 HU [95% CI 23–11], 42 HU [95% CI 33–56], p = 0.05). No significant relationship between DECT-FF and SMI-based classifications was observed.

Conclusions

Fat quantification within the skeletal muscle using DECT is both feasible and reliable. DECT muscle analysis offers a new approach to determine muscle quality, which is important for the diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of sarcopenia, as a comorbidity associated with poor clinical outcome.

Key Points

• Dual-energy CT (DECT) material decomposition and virtual non-contrast-enhanced DECT HU values assess muscle fat reliably.

• Virtual non-contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT HU values allow to differentiate between high and low native skeletal muscle mean radiation attenuation in contrast-enhanced DECT scans.

• Measuring muscle fat by dual-energy computed tomography is a new approach for the determination of muscle quality, an important parameter for the diagnostic confirmation of sarcopenia as a comorbidity associated with poor clinical outcome.

Multicentric study of patients receiving 50 or 100 mSv in a single day through CT imaging-frequency determination and imaging protocols involved

OBJECTIVES

To assess the magnitude and characterization of CT imaging protocols of patients receiving 50 or 100 mSv in a single day.

METHODS

In this multicentric retrospective study covering up to 279 hospitals from January 2015 to December 2019, the effective dose (E) as estimated by dose management system from dose length product of patients was filtered and grouped into per-day dose bands (≤ 20, > 20-50, > 50-70, > 70-100, > 100-200, > 200 mSv). Information on patient's age and imaging protocol was noted. The data were analyzed to determine the frequency of occurrence in each dose band. Top 20 CT imaging protocols that led to patients with a dose of ≥ 50 mSv in a single acquisition were identified and their relative frequency was estimated.

RESULTS

A total of approx. 4.3 million (4,283,738) CT exams were performed in approx. 3.9 million (3,880,524) patient-days indicating 9.41% had more than one CT exam in a single day. There were 31,058 (0.8%) patient-days with ≥ 50 mSv and 1191 (0.03%) with ≥ 100 mSv. Nearly 1/3^rd patient-days reaching ≥ 50 mSv were of patients aged 50 years or younger. The top 20 CT imaging protocols that led to ≥ 50 mSv in a single day belonged to the body region (chest or abdomen and pelvis) and nearly one-third were angiographic studies.

CONCLUSIONS

In the first study of its kind, we report that patients with 50 mSv+ in a single day or a single exam are not rare. The information on imaging protocols leading to such doses and their frequency has been provided to help develop dose management strategies.

KEY POINTS

• Our study of 4,283,738 CT exams performed in 3,880,524 patient-days indicates 0.8% with 50 mSv+ and 0.03% with 100 mSv+ in a single day. • A total of 9.41% underwent more than one CT exam in a single day; nearly 1/3^rd of those with 50 mSv+ were ≤ 50 years of age. • Identified top 20 CT imaging protocols that led to 50 mSv+ doses in a single exam. All belong to chest or abdomen and pelvis and nearly 1/3^rd were angiographic studies.

Use of Multiphase CT Protocols in 18 Countries: Appropriateness and Radiation Doses

Purpose:

To assess the frequency, appropriateness, and radiation doses associated with multiphase computed tomography (CT) protocols for routine chest and abdomen–pelvis examinations in 18 countries.

Materials and Methods:

In collaboration with the International Atomic Energy Agency, multi-institutional data on clinical indications, number of scan phases, scan parameters, and radiation dose descriptors (CT dose–index volume; dose–length product [DLP]) were collected for routine chest (n = 1706 patients) and abdomen–pelvis (n = 426 patients) CT from 18 institutions in Asia, Africa, and Europe. Two radiologists scored the need for each phase based on clinical indications (1 = not indicated, 2 = probably indicated, 3 = indicated). We surveyed 11 institutions for their practice regarding single-phase and multiphase CT examinations. Data were analyzed with the Student t test.

Results:

Most institutions use multiphase protocols for routine chest (10/18 institutions) and routine abdomen–pelvis (10/11 institutions that supplied data for abdomen–pelvis) CT examinations. Most institutions (10/11) do not modify scan parameters between different scan phases. Respective total DLP for 1-, 2-, and 3-phase routine chest CT was 272, 518, and 820 mGy·cm, respectively. Corresponding values for 1- to 5-phase routine abdomen–pelvis CT were 400, 726, 1218, 1214, and 1458 mGy cm, respectively. For multiphase CT protocols, there were no differences in scan parameters and radiation doses between different phases for either chest or abdomen–pelvis CT ( P = 0.40-0.99). Multiphase CT examinations were unnecessary in 100% of routine chest CT and in 63% of routine abdomen–pelvis CT examinations.

Conclusions:

Multiphase scan protocols for the routine chest and abdomen–pelvis CT examinations are unnecessary, and their use increases radiation dose.

Multiphase abdomen-pelvis CT in women of childbearing potential (WOCBP): Justification and radiation dose

To assess justification and radiation doses of abdomen-pelvis CT in women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) scanned in 2 tertiary hospitals in Qatar.The local ethical committee approved retrospective study of 451 WOCBP (14-55 years) who underwent abdomen-pelvis CT examinations. Patients' age, clinical indications for ordered CT, scanner types and vendors, number and type of scan phases (non-contrast, arterial, portal venous, and/or delayed phases), and radiation dose descriptors (CT dose index volume - CTDIvol and dose length product- DLP) were recorded. Patients undergoing simultaneous chest-abdomen-pelvis CT were excluded. We classified the clinical indications for all 451 CT into indicated and unindicated based on the ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Information regarding the date of last menstrual period, likelihood of pregnancy, and if available, results of the pregnancy test were recorded. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics (median and inter-quartile range) and analysis of variance (ANOVA).None of the patients were pregnant at the time of their scanning. Amongst the 673 phases acquired for multiphase abdomen-pelvis CT in 451 patients, the 47% unindicated phases (315/673) included non-contrast (122/673, 18%), arterial (33/673, 5%), portal venous (125/673, 19%) and delayed (35/673, 5%) phases. The respective median DLP for indicated and unindicated phases were 266 and 758 mGy.cm (P < .0001).Multiphase abdomen-pelvis CT exams are frequent but seldom justified in WOCBP. They lead to a substantial increase in unindicated radiation dose compared to a single-phase CT.

Unindicated multiphase CT scans in non-traumatic abdominal emergencies for women of reproductive age: a significant source of unnecessary exposure

PURPOSE

To determine the frequency of unindicated CT phases and the resultant excess of absorbed radiation doses to the uterus and ovaries in women of reproductive age who have undergone CT for non-traumatic abdomino-pelvic emergencies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed all abdomino-pelvic CT examinations in women of reproductive age (40 years or less), between 1 June 2012 and 31 January 2015. We evaluated the appropriateness of each CT phase on the basis of clinical indications, according to ACR appropriateness criteria and evidence-based data from the literature. The doses to uterus and ovaries for each phase were calculated with the CTEXPO software, taking into consideration the size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) after measuring the size of every single patient.

RESULTS

The final cohort was composed of 76 female patients with an average age of 30 (from 19 to 40 years). In total, 197 CT phases were performed with an average of 2.6 phases per patient. Out of these, 93 (47%) were unindicated with an average of 1.2 inappropriate phases per patient. Unindicated scans were most frequent for appendicitis and unlocalized abdominal pain. The excesses of mean radiation doses to the uterus and ovaries due to unindicated phases were, respectively, of 38 and 33 mSv per patient.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, unindicated additional CT phases were numerous with a significant excess radiation dose without an associated clinical benefit. This excess of radiation could have been avoided by widespread adoption of the ACR appropriateness criteria and evidence-based data from the literature.

Multi-detector CT: Liver protocol and recent developments

Multi-detector computed tomography is today the workhorse in the evaluation of the vast majority of patients with known or suspected liver disease. Reasons for that include widespread availability, robustness and repeatability of the technique, time-efficient image acquisitions of large body volumes, high temporal and spatial resolution as well as multiple post-processing capabilities. However, as the technique employs ionizing radiation and intravenous iodine-based contrast media, the associated potential risks have to be taken into account. In this review article, liver protocols in clinical practice are discussed with emphasis on optimisation strategies. Furthermore, recent developments such as perfusion CT and dual-energy CT and their applications are presented.

Multimodality imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas account for approximately 20% of cases of cholangiocarcinomas. Three growth patterns or morphologic subtypes exist, including mass-forming, periductal-infiltrating, and intraductal-growth subtypes. Knowledge of these morphologic subtypes and their radiologic appearance aids in timely diagnosis, a key to optimizing patient outcomes. The morphologic variability of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas has a direct impact on the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of various diagnostic imaging modalities, including ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), and positron emission tomography (PET). The following review emphasizes optimal imaging technique for each of these modalities and reviews the imaging appearance of each morphologic subtype of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Diagnostic efficacy of single-pass abdominal multidetector-row CT: prospective evaluation of a low dose protocol

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of single-pass contrast-enhanced multidetector CT (CE-MDCT) performed with a low-radiation high-contrast (LR-HC) dose protocol in selected patients with non-traumatic acute bowel disease.

METHODS

65 (32 males, 33 females; aged 20-67 years) consecutive patients with non-traumatic acute bowel disease underwent single-pass CE-MDCT performed 70-100 s after i.v. bolus injection of a non-ionic iodinated contrast medium (CM) (370 mgI ml^-1). In 46 (70%) patients with a clinical and/or ultrasonographic suspicion of inflammatory bowel disease, up to 1.2-1.4 l of a 7% polyethylene-glycol solution was orally administered 45-60 mins prior to the CT examination. Patients were then divided into two groups according to age: Group A (20-44 years; n = 34) and Group B (45-70 years; n = 31). Noise index (NI) and CM dose were selected as follows: Group A (NI = 15; 2.5 ml kg^-1) and Group B (NI = 12.5; 2 ml kg^-1). All patients of Group A underwent thyroid functional tests at 4-6 weeks. Final diagnoses were obtained by open (n = 12) or laparoscopic surgery (n = 4), endoscopy w/without biopsy (n = 24) and clinical (n = 19) and/or instrumental (ultrasonography) (n = 6) follow-up at 11 ± 4 months (range 6-18 mo.). Statistical analysis was performed by χ² and Student's t-test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity were 91.3 vs 95.4% (p = 0.905) and 90.9 vs 88.8% (p = 0.998) with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 91.1 vs 93.5% (p = 0.756), whereas the radiation (in millisievert) and CM dose (in millilitre) were 7.5 ± 2.8 mSv and 155 ± 30 ml for Group A and 14.1 ± 5.3 mSv and 130 ± 24 ml for Group B (p < 0.001), respectively. No patients of Group A showed laboratory signs of thyrotoxicosis at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The LR-HC has proved to be a safe and a dose-effective protocol in the evaluation of selected young patients with non-traumatic acute bowel disease. Advances in knowledge: (1) As reaching the highest diagnostic benefit to risk ratio (AHARA) appears to be the current principle of MDCT imaging, an increased amount of iodinated CM (0.7-0.9 gI ml^-1) can be safely administered to young patients (<40 years) with normal thyroid and renal function to compensate for the lower image quality resulting from low-dose CT protocols performed with the standard filter back-projection algorithm. Such an approach will result in a significant reduction of the radiation dose, which could be otherwise achieved only using iterative reconstruction algorithms combined with either low tube voltage and/or low tube current protocols. (2) An optimal scan delay (T_delay) for a venous phase caudocranial acquisition can be calculated by the following formula: T_delay = CI + 25 - T_SD, where CI is the duration of the contrast injection, 25 is the average of the sum of abdominal aortic and peak hepatic arrival times and T_SD is the scan duration. With such an approach, the radiation exposure resulting from bolus tracking, albeit performed with low-dose scans, can be spared in patients with normal transit times.

Readjustment of abdominal computed tomography protocols in a university hospital: impact on radiation dose

Objective

To assess the reduction of estimated radiation dose in abdominal computed tomography following the implementation of new scan protocols on the basis of clinical suspicion and of adjusted images acquisition parameters.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective and prospective review of reports on radiation dose from abdominal CT scans performed three months before (group A – 551 studies) and three months after (group B – 788 studies) implementation of new scan protocols proposed as a function of clinical indications. Also, the images acquisition parameters were adjusted to reduce the radiation dose at each scan phase. The groups were compared for mean number of acquisition phases, mean CTDI_vol per phase, mean DLP per phase, and mean DLP per scan.

Results

A significant reduction was observed for group B as regards all the analyzed aspects, as follows: 33.9%, 25.0%, 27.0% and 52.5%, respectively for number of acquisition phases, CTDI_vol per phase, DLP per phase and DLP per scan (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The rational use of abdominal computed tomography scan phases based on the clinical suspicion in conjunction with the adjusted images acquisition parameters allows for a 50% reduction in the radiation dose from abdominal computed tomography scans.

Balancing Radiation and Contrast Media Dose in Single-Pass Abdominal Multidetector CT: Prospective Evaluation of Image Quality

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

As both contrast and radiation dose affect the quality of CT images, a constant image quality in abdominal contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (CE-MDCT) could be obtained balancing radiation and contrast media dose according to the age of the patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-two (38 Men; 34 women; aged 20-83 years) patients underwent a single-pass abdominal CE-MDCT. Patients were divided into three different age groups: A (20-44 years); B (45-65 years); and C (>65 years). For each group, a different noise index (NI) and contrast media dose (370 mgI/mL) was selected as follows: A (NI, 15; 2.5 mL/kg), B (NI, 12.5; 2 mL/kg), and C (NI, 10; 1.5 mL/kg). Radiation exposure was reported as dose-length product (DLP) in mGy × cm. For quantitative analysis, signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratios were calculated for both the liver (L) and the abdominal aorta (A). Statistical analysis was performed with a one-way analysis of variance. Standard imaging criteria were used for qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

Although peak hepatic enhancement was 152 ± 16, 128 ± 12, and 101 ± 14 Hounsfield units (P < .001) for groups A, B, and C, respectively, no significant differences were observed in the corresponding SNRL with 9.2 ± 1.4, 9.1 ± 1.2, and 9.2 ± 3. Radiation (mGy × cm) and contrast media dose (mL) administered were 476 ± 147 and 155 ± 27 for group A, 926 ± 291 and 130 ± 16 for group B, and 1981 ± 451 and 106 ± 15 for group C, respectively (P < .001). None of the studies was graded as poor or inadequate by both readers, and the prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa ranged between 0.48 and 0.93 for all but one criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

A constant image quality in CE-MDCT can be obtained balancing radiation and contrast media dose administered to patients of different age.

Comparison of diagnostic performance between single- and multiphasic contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic computed tomography in patients admitted to the emergency department with abdominal pain: potential radiation dose reduction

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate feasibility of radiation dose reduction by optimal phase selection of computed tomography (CT) in patients who visited the emergency department (ED) for abdominal pain.

METHODS

We included 253 patients who visited the ED for abdominal pain. They underwent multiphasic CT including precontrast, late arterial phase (LAP), and hepatic venous phase (HVP). Three image sets (HVP, precontrast + HVP, and precontrast + LAP + HVP) were reviewed. Two reviewers determined the most appropriate diagnosis with five-point confidence scale. Diagnostic performances were compared among image sets by weighted-least-squares method or DeLong's method. Linear mixed model was used to assess changes of diagnostic confidence and radiation dose.

RESULTS

There was no difference in diagnostic performance among three image sets, although diagnostic confidence level was significantly improved after review of triphasic images compared with both HVP images only or HVP with precontrast images (confidence scale, 4.64 ± 0.05, 4.66 ± 0.05, and 4.76 ± 0.04 in the order of the sets; overall P = 0.0008). Similar trends were observed in the subgroup analysis for diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease and cholecystitis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference between HVP-CT alone and multiphasic CT for the diagnosis of causes of abdominal pain in patients admitted to the ED without prior chronic disease or neoplasia.

KEY POINTS

• There was no difference in diagnostic performance of HVP CT and multiphasic CT. • The diagnostic confidence level was improved after review of the LAP images. • HVP CT can achieve diagnostic performance similar to that of multiphasic CT, while minimizing radiation.