TRUS-MRI image registration: a paradigm shift in the diagnosis of significant prostate cancer

Risks of grade reclassification among patients with Gleason grade group 1 prostate cancer and PI-RADS 5 findings on prostate MRI

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

As most Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 5 lesions on MRI harbor Gleason grade (GG) group ≥2 disease on biopsy, optimal management of patients with imaging-biopsy discordance remains unclear. To estimate grade misclassification, we evaluated the incidence of Gleason upgrading among patients with GG1 disease in the setting of a PI-RADS 5 lesion.

METHODS

We conducted a single-institution retrospective analysis to identify patients with GG1 prostate cancer on fusion biopsy with MRI demonstrating ≥1 PI-RADS 5 lesion. Primary study outcome was identification of ≥GG2 disease on subsequent active surveillance (AS) biopsy or radical prostatectomy (RP). We used multivariable models to examine factors associated with reclassification.

RESULTS

We identified 110 patients with GG1 disease on initial biopsy and ≥1 PI-RADS 5 lesion. There were 104 patients (94.6%) initially managed with AS and 6 (5.5%) received treatment. Sixty-one patients (58.7%) on AS underwent additional biopsies. Of these, 43 (70.5%) patients had tumor upgrading, with 32 (74.4%) upgraded on first surveillance biopsy. Forty-four (40%) patients ultimately received treatment, including prostatectomy in 15 (13.6%) and radiation in 25 (22.7%). Two patients (1.8%) developed metastases. In multivariable models, genomic classifier score was associated with upgrading. Limitations include a lack of multi-institutional data and long-term outcomes data.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients diagnosed with GG1 prostate cancer on MRI-Ultrasound fusion biopsy in the setting of a PI-RADS 5 lesion were found to have ≥GG2 disease on subsequent tissue sampling, suggesting substantial initial misclassification and reinforcing the need for confirmatory testing.

Direct MRI-guided In-Bore Targeted Biopsy of the Prostate: A Step-by-Step How To and Lessons Learned

Multiparametric MRI-the most accurate imaging technique for detection of prostate cancer-has transformed the landscape of prostate cancer diagnosis by enabling targeted biopsies. In a targeted biopsy, tissue samples are obtained from suspicious regions identified at prebiopsy diagnostic MRI. The authors briefly compare the different strategies available for targeting an MRI-visible suspicious lesion, followed by a step-by-step description of the direct MRI-guided in-bore approach and an illustrated review of its application in challenging clinical scenarios. In this technique, direct visualization of the needle, needle guide, and needle trajectory during the procedure provides a precise and versatile strategy to accurately sample suspicious lesions, improving detection of clinically significant cancers. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

2D/3D Deep Registration Along Trajectories With Spatiotemporal Context: Application to Prostate Biopsy Navigation

OBJECTIVE

The accuracy of biopsy targeting is a major issue for prostate cancer diagnosis and therapy. However, navigation to biopsy targets remains challenging due to the limitations of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guidance added to prostate motion issues. This article describes a rigid 2D/3D deep registration method, which provides a continuous tracking of the biopsy location w.r.t the prostate for enhanced navigation.

METHODS

A spatiotemporal registration network (SpT-Net) is proposed to localize the live 2D US image relatively to a previously aquired US reference volume. The temporal context relies on prior trajectory information based on previous registration results and probe tracking. Different forms of spatial context were compared through inputs (local, partial or global) or using an additional spatial penalty term. The proposed 3D CNN architecture with all combinations of spatial and temporal context was evaluated in an ablation study. For providing a realistic clinical validation, a cumulative error was computed through series of registrations along trajectories, simulating a complete clinical navigation procedure. We also proposed two dataset generation processes with increasing levels of registration complexity and clinical realism.

RESULTS

The experiments show that a model using local spatial information combined with temporal information performs better than more complex spatiotemporal combination.

CONCLUSION

The best proposed model demonstrates robust real-time 2D/3D US cumulated registration performance on trajectories. Those results respect clinical requirements, application feasibility, and they outperform similar state-of-the-art methods.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our approach seems promising for clinical prostate biopsy navigation assistance or other US image-guided procedure.

Feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: Preliminary results from a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate preliminary outcomes of a prospective trial of magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided ultrafocal high-dose-rate brachytherapy in localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

In our prospective study, data from patients who underwent this treatment between April 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021 were analyzed. In the procedure, the applicator needle was inserted through the perineum to target the lesion on the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, which was fused onto the transrectal ultrasound image. The prescription dose was set at a single fraction of 19 Gy. Data from patients who received whole-gland high-dose-rate brachytherapy were extracted and compared with data from patients who received ultrafocal high-dose-rate brachytherapy, to evaluate the frequency of acute adverse events.

RESULTS

Eight patients underwent ultrafocal high-dose-rate brachytherapy with a median observation period of 7.75 months (range 5.96-15.36 months). No acute genitourinary or gastrointestinal adverse events were observed in this cohort. The planned procedure was completed in all patients, and no unexpected adverse events were observed; however, prostate-specific antigen failure was detected in one patient. In the 25 patients who underwent whole-gland high-dose-rate brachytherapy, acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal adverse events were observed in 88% and 20% of the patients, respectively. Ultrafocal high-dose-rate brachytherapy was a significant factor in avoiding acute adverse genitourinary events in univariate and multivariate analyses (P < 0.001 and P = 0.032, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided ultrafocal high-dose-rate brachytherapy in localized prostate cancer is a safe and feasible treatment without acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal adverse events. Long-term observation and further investigation are warranted.

Biomechanical modelling of the pelvic system: improving the accuracy of the location of neoplasms in MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy

Background

An accurate knowledge of the relocation of prostate neoplasms during biopsy is of great importance to reduce the number of false negative results. Prostate neoplasms are visible in magnetic resonance images (MRI) but it is difficult for the practitioner to locate them at the time of performing a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy. In this study, we present a new methodology, based on simulation, that predicts both prostate deformation and lesion migration during the biopsy.

Methods

A three-dimensional (3-D) anatomy model of the pelvic region, based on medical images, is constructed. A finite element (FE) numerical simulation of the organs motion and deformation as a result of the pressure exerted by the TRUS probe is carried out using the Code-Aster open-source computer software. Initial positions of potential prostate lesions prior to biopsy are taken into consideration and the final location of each lesion is targeted in the FE simulation output.

Results

Our 3-D FE simulations show that the effect of the pressure exerted by the TRUS probe is twofold as the prostate experiences both a motion and a deformation of its original shape. We targeted the relocation of five small prostate lesions when the TRUS probe exerts a force of 30 N on the rectum inner wall. The distance travelled by these lesions ranged between 5.6 and 13.9 mm.

Conclusions

Our new methodology can help to predict the location of neoplasms during a prostate biopsy but further studies are needed to validate our results. Moreover, the new methodology is completely developed on open-source software, which means that its implementation would be affordable to all healthcare providers.

Feasibility and safety of targeted focal microwave ablation of the index tumor in patients with low to intermediate risk prostate cancer: Results of the FOSTINE trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility, safety and precision of organ-based tracking (OBT)-fusion targeted focal microwave ablation (FMA), in patients with low to intermediate risk prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Ten patients with a visible index tumor of Gleason score ≤3+4, largest diameter <20mm were included. Transrectal OBT-fusion targeted FMA was performed using an 18G needle. Primary endpoint was the evidence of complete overlap of the index tumor by ablation zone necrosis on MRI 7 days after ablation. Urinary and sexual function were assessed with IPSS, IIEF5 and MSHQ-EjD-SF. Oncological outcomes were assessed with PSA at 2 and 6 months, and re-biopsy at 6 months.

RESULTS

Median [IQR] age was 64.5 [61-72] years and baseline PSA was 5 [4.3-8.1] ng/mL. Seven (70%) and 3 (30%) patients had a low and intermediate risk cancer, respectively. Median largest tumor axis was of 11 [9.0-15.0] mm. Median duration of procedure was of 82 [44-170] min. No patient reported any pain or rectal bleeding, and all 10 patients were discharged the next day. Seven days after ablation, total necrosis of the index tumor on MRI was obtained in eight (80% [95%CI 55%-100%]) patients. One patient was treated with radical prostatectomy. Re-biopsy at 6 months in the other 9 did not show evidence of cancer in 4 patients. IPSS, IIEF-5 and MSHQ-EjD-SF were not statistically different between baseline and 6 months follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

OBT-fusion targeted FMA was feasible, precise, and safe in patients with low to intermediate risk localized prostate cancer.

Towards real-time free-hand biopsy navigation

PURPOSE

Performing a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate biopsy is at the heart of the current prostate cancer detection procedure. With today's two-dimensional (2D) live ultrasound (US) imaging equipment, this task remains complex due to the poor visibility of cancerous tissue on TRUS images and the limited anatomical context available in the 2D TRUS plane. This paper presents a rigid 2D/3DUS registration method for navigated prostate biopsy. This allows continuous localization of the biopsy trajectory during the procedure.

METHODS

We proposed an organ-based approach to achieve real-time rigid registration without the need for any probe localization device. The registration method combines image similarity and geometric proximity of detected features. Additions to our previous work include a multi-level approach and the use of a rejection rate favouring the best matches. Their aim is to increase the accuracy and time performances. These modifications and their in-depth evaluation on real clinical cases and comparison to this previous work are described. We performed static and dynamic evaluations along biopsy trajectories on a very large amount of data acquired under uncontrolled routine conditions. The computed transforms are compared to a ground truth obtained either from corresponding manually detected fiducials or from an already evaluated registration method.

RESULTS

All results show that the current method outperforms its previous version, both in terms of accuracy (the average error reported here is 12 to 17% smaller depending on the experiment) and processing time (from 20 to 60 times faster compared to the previous implementation). The dynamic registration experiment demonstrates that the method can be successfully used for continuous tracking of the biopsy location w.r.t the prostate at a rate that varies between 5 and 15 Hz.

CONCLUSIONS

This work shows that on the fly 2D/3DUS registration can be performed very efficiently on biopsy trajectories. This allows us to plan further improvements in prostate navigation and a clinical transfer.

Quick guide on radiology image pre-processing for deep learning applications in prostate cancer research

Purpose: Deep learning has achieved major breakthroughs during the past decade in almost every field. There are plenty of publicly available algorithms, each designed to address a different task of computer vision in general. However, most of these algorithms cannot be directly applied to images in the medical domain. Herein, we are focused on the required preprocessing steps that should be applied to medical images prior to deep neural networks. Approach: To be able to employ the publicly available algorithms for clinical purposes, we must make a meaningful pixel/voxel representation from medical images which facilitates the learning process. Based on the ultimate goal expected from an algorithm (classification, detection, or segmentation), one may infer the required pre-processing steps that can ideally improve the performance of that algorithm. Required pre-processing steps for computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images in their correct order are discussed in detail. We further supported our discussion by relevant experiments to investigate the efficiency of the listed preprocessing steps. Results: Our experiments confirmed how using appropriate image pre-processing in the right order can improve the performance of deep neural networks in terms of better classification and segmentation. Conclusions: This work investigates the appropriate pre-processing steps for CT and MR images of prostate cancer patients, supported by several experiments that can be useful for educating those new to the field (https://github.com/NIH-MIP/Radiology_Image_Preprocessing_for_Deep_Learning).

MRI-directed high-frequency (29MhZ) TRUS-guided biopsies: initial results of a single-center study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the ability of high-frequency (29 MHz) transrectal micro-ultrasound (microUS) as a second-look examination after biparametric MRI (bp-MRI) and to reidentify focal lesions seen on diagnostic MRI and to detect new ones METHODS: A total of 118 consecutive men (mean age, 66 ± 13 [SD] years; range, 49-93 years) with a mean prostate-specific antigen level of 11 ± 19 (SD) ng/mL (range, 2-200 ng/mL) and at least one focal lesion (MRI+) with a score > 2 on bp-MRI were included. Of these, 79/118 (66.9%) were biopsy-naïve and 102/118 (86.5%) had non-suspicious rectal examination. All patients had MRI-directed microUS-guided biopsy using a 29-MHz transducer. All lesions visible on micro-ultrasound (microUS+) were targeted without image fusion, which was only used for MRI+/microUS- lesions. Significant prostate cancer (sPCa) was defined by a Gleason score ≥ 7 or a maximum cancer core length > 3 mm.

RESULTS

A total of 144 focal prostatic lesions were analyzed, including 114 (114/144, 79.2%) MRI+/microUS+ lesions, 13 MRI+/microUS- lesions (13/144, 9%), and 17 MRI-/microUS+ lesions (17/144, 11.8%). Significant PCa was detected in 70 MRI+/microUS+ lesions (70/114, 61.4%), in no MRI+/microUS- lesion (0/13, 0%), and in 4 MRI-/microUS+ lesions (4/17, 23.5%). The sensitivity and specificity of microUS on a per-patient and a per-lesion basis were 100% (95% CI, 84.9-100%) and 22.8% (95% CI, 12.5-35.8%) and 100% (95% CI, 85.1-100%) and 22.6% (95% CI, 12.3-36.2%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

MicroUS, as a second-look examination, may show promise to localize targets detected on bp-MRI.

KEY POINTS

• Used as a second-look examination, microUS-guided biopsies have a 100% detection rate of sCa originating in the PZ or lower third of the TZ, without microUS-MRI image fusion. • MicroUS results may provide additional information about lesions visible on MRI. • MicroUS may provide the ability to detect small PZ lesions undetected by bp-MRI.

Prostate MRI using an external phased array wearable pelvic coil at 3T: comparison with an endorectal coil

PURPOSE

To evaluate T2w and DWI image quality using a wearable pelvic coil (WPC) compared with an endorectal coil (ERC).

METHODS

Twenty men consecutively presenting to our prostate cancer MRI clinic were prospectively consented to be scanned using a wearable pelvic coil then an endorectal coil and pelvic phased array coil at 3T. Eighteen patients were suitable for inclusion. Axial T2w images were obtained using the WPC and ERC, and DWI images were obtained using the WPC, ERC, and PPA. Analysis was performed in consensus by two readers with experience in prostate MRI. The readers scored the T2w images using six qualitative criteria and the DWI images using five criteria. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was also measured.

RESULTS

T2w artifact severity was greater for an ERC than a WPC (p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in T2w qualititatve image quality by other measures. The distinction of zonal anatomy on DWI was superior for an ERC compared with both a WPC and a PPA (p = 0.018 and p < 0.001 respectively), and there was no significant difference in DWI image quality by other measures. SNR was significantly higher for ERC imaging for both T2w and DWI.

CONCLUSION

WPC imaging provides comparable image quality to that of an ERC, potentially reducing the need for an ERC. WPC imaging shows reduced T2w artifact severity and inferior DWI zonal anatomy distinction compared with an ERC. Imaging with a WPC produces a lower SNR than an ERC.

Refining the risk-stratification of transrectal biopsy-detected prostate cancer by elastic fusion registration transperineal biopsies

PURPOSE

To evaluate image-guided Transperineal Elastic-Registration biopsy (TPER-B) in the risk-stratification of low-intermediate risk prostate cancer detected by Transrectal-ultrasound biopsy (TRUS-B) when estimates of cancer grade and volume discorded with multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

METHODS

All patients referred for active surveillance or organ-conservative management were collegially reviewed for consistency between TRUS-B results and MRI. Image-guided TPER-B of the index target (IT) defined as the largest Prostate Imaging-Reporting Data System-v2 ≥ 3 abnormality was organized for discordant cases. Pathology reported Gleason grade, maximum cancer core length (MCCL) and total CCL (TCCL).

RESULTS

Of 237 prostate cancer patients (1-4/2018), 30 were required TPER-B for risk-stratification. Eight cores were obtained [Median and IQR: 8 (6-9)] including six (IQR: 4-6) in the IT. TPER-B of the IT yielded longer MCCL [Mean and (95%CI): 6.9 (5.0-8.8) vs. 2.6 mm (1.9-3.3), p < 0.0001] and TCCL [19.7 (11.6-27.8) vs. 3.6 mm (2.6-4.5), p = 0.0002] than TRUS-B of the gland. On TPER-B cores, longer MCCL [Mean and (95%CI): 8.7 mm (6.7-10.7) vs. 4.1 mm (0.6-7.6), p = 0.002] were measured in Gleason score-7 cancers. TPER-B cores upgraded 13/30 (43.3%) patients. 14/30 (46.7%) met University College London-definition 1 and 18/30 (60.0%) definition 2, which correlate with clinically significant cancers > 0.5 mL and > 0.2 mL, respectively. 7/16 (43.8%) patients under active surveillance were re-allocated toward prostatectomy (n = 5) or radiation therapy (n = 2). In 14 patients not yet assigned, TPER-B risk-stratification spurred the selection (13/14, 92.9%) of treatments with curative intent.

CONCLUSION

Image-guided TPER-B of the index target provided more cancer material for pathology. Subsequent re-evaluation of cancer volume and grade switched a majority of patients towards higher-risk groups and treatments with curative intent.

Accurate validation of ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer: a review of challenges in registration of imaging and histopathology

As the development of modalities for prostate cancer (PCa) imaging advances, the challenge of accurate registration between images and histopathologic ground truth becomes more pressing. Localization of PCa, rather than detection, requires a pixel-to-pixel validation of imaging based on histopathology after radical prostatectomy. Such a registration procedure is challenging for ultrasound modalities; not only the deformations of the prostate after resection have to be taken into account, but also the deformation due to the employed transrectal probe and the mismatch in orientation between imaging planes and pathology slices. In this work, we review the latest techniques to facilitate accurate validation of PCa localization in ultrasound imaging studies and extrapolate a general strategy for implementation of a registration procedure.

The emerging role of imaging in prostate cancer secondary screening: multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and the incipient incorporation of molecular imaging

An increasingly robust body of evidence indicates that multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) prior to prostate biopsy can improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer while avoiding unnecessary biopsies. As a result, the use of mpMRI and biopsy platforms that allow for the real-time fusion of mpMRI and transrectal ultrasound images is now routinely used in clinical practice. On the horizon, molecular imaging offers the promise of improved sensitivity relative to mpMRI and early data would suggest that the combination of mpMRI and positron emission tomography using radiotracers targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen provide a more accurate assessment than either modality alone. In this review, we examine the current role of imaging to aid in the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer.

[Prostate brachytherapy: New techniques, new indications]

Prostate brachytherapy has been for a long time one of the standard treatments for low risk prostate cancer, with high rates of biochemical control and low levels of urinary and sexual late toxicity compared to other available techniques, namely external beam radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy. The aim of this article is to review the recent innovations of prostate brachytherapy, which suggest a bright future for the technique. We will discuss the extension of indications of permanent implant brachytherapy to favorable intermediate-risk patients, the use of novel isotopes such as Palladium 103 and Cesium 131, and the benefit of brachytherapy as a boost following external beam radiotherapy for intermediate and high-risk patients. We will also discuss the rise of high dose rate brachytherapy, as a boost or monotherapy, the increasing use of MRI for patient selection and treatment planning, as well as the development of brachytherapy as a means of focal therapy.

IDEAL 2a Phase II Study of Ultrafocal Brachytherapy for Low- and Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Focal therapy of prostate cancer requires precise positioning of therapeutic agents within well-characterized index tumors (ITs). We assessed the feasibility of low-dose-rate ultrafocal brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The present study was an institutional review board-approved European Clinical Trials Database-registered phase II protocol. Patients referred (October 2013 to August 2016) for active surveillance (prostate-specific antigen <10 ng/mL, cT1c-cT2a, Gleason score on referring biopsy specimens ≤6 (3+3), ≤3 positive biopsy cores, ≤50% of cancer) were preselected. Inclusion was confirmed when complementary image-guided biopsy findings informed a single Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥3, Gleason score ≤7a (3+4) lesion. A ultrasound-visible ancillary marker was positioned within the IT using a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) elastic fusion-guided system (Koelis). Ultrafocal transperineal delivery of ¹²⁵I seeds used classic 2-dimensional TRUS (Bard-FlexFocus) and dose optimization (Variseed Treatment Planning System). Following Simon's optimal design, 17 patients were required to assess the feasibility of delivering ≥95% of the prescribed dose (160 Gy) to the IT (primary objective). Adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) and quality of life (5-item International Index of Erectile Function, International Prostate Symptom Score) were recorded. One-year control biopsy specimens were obtained from the IT and untreated segments.

RESULTS

Of the 44 preselected patients, 27 did not meet the inclusion criteria. Of the 17 ultrafocal brachytherapy-treated patients, 16 met the primary objective (per protocol success). The prescription dose was delivered to 14.5% ± 6.4% of the prostate volume, resulting in negligible urethral and rectal irradiation and toxicity. No recurrence was evidenced on the 1-year follow-up MRI studies or IT biopsy specimens. Seven nonclinically significant cancers and one Gleason score 7a (3+4) cancer (salvage prostatectomy) were observed in the untreated parenchyma.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent technology has allowed for selective and effective brachytherapy of small MRI targets.

Precision of MRI/ultrasound-fusion biopsy in prostate cancer diagnosis: an ex vivo comparison of alternative biopsy techniques on prostate phantoms

PURPOSE

Comparing the accuracy of MRI/ultrasound-guided target-biopsy by transrectal biopsy (TRB) with elastic versus rigid image fusion versus transperineal biopsy (TPB) with rigid image fusion in a standardized setting.

METHODS

Target-biopsy of six differently sized and located lesions was performed on customized CIRS 070L prostate phantoms. Lesions were only MRI-visible. After prior MRI for lesion location, one targeted biopsy per lesion was obtained by TRB with elastic image fusion with Artemis™ (Eigen, USA), TRB with rigid image fusion with real-time virtual sonography (Hitachi, Japan) and TPB with rigid image fusion with a brachytherapy approach (Elekta, Sweden), each on a phantom of 50, 100 and 150 ml prostate volume. The needle trajectories were marked by contrast agent and detected in a postinterventional MRI.

RESULTS

Overall target detection rate was 79.6% with a slight superiority for the TPB (83.3 vs. 77.8 vs. 77.8%). TRB with elastic image fusion showed the highest overall precision [median distance to lesion center 2.37 mm (0.14-4.18 mm)], independent of prostate volume. Anterior lesions were significantly more precisely hit than transitional and basal lesions (p = 0.034; p = 0.015) with comparable accuracy for TRB with elastic image fusion and TPB. In general, TRB with rigid image fusion was inferior [median 3.15 mm (0.37-10.62 mm)], particularly in small lesions.

CONCLUSION

All biopsy techniques allow detection of clinically significant tumors with a median error of 2-3 mm. Elastic image fusion appears to be the most precise technique, independent of prostate volume, target size or location.

Biomechanical modeling constrained surface-based image registration for prostate MR guided TRUS biopsy

PURPOSE

Adding magnetic resonance (MR)-derived information to standard transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images for guiding prostate biopsy is of substantial clinical interest. A tumor visible on MR images can be projected on ultrasound (US) by using MR-US registration. A common approach is to use surface-based registration. The authors hypothesize that biomechanical modeling will better control deformation inside the prostate than a regular nonrigid surface-based registration method. The authors developed a novel method by extending a nonrigid surface-based registration algorithm with biomechanical finite element (FE) modeling to better predict internal deformations of the prostate.

METHODS

Data were collected from ten patients and the MR and TRUS images were rigidly registered to anatomically align prostate orientations. The prostate was manually segmented in both images and corresponding surface meshes were generated. Next, a tetrahedral volume mesh was generated from the MR image. Prostate deformations due to the TRUS probe were simulated using the surface displacements as the boundary condition. A three-dimensional thin-plate spline deformation field was calculated by registering the mesh vertices. The target registration errors (TREs) of 35 reference landmarks determined by surface and volume mesh registrations were compared.

RESULTS

The median TRE of a surface-based registration with biomechanical regularization was 2.76 (0.81-7.96) mm. This was significantly different than the median TRE of 3.47 (1.05-7.80) mm for regular surface-based registration without biomechanical regularization.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomechanical FE modeling has the potential to improve the accuracy of multimodal prostate registration when comparing it to a regular nonrigid surface-based registration algorithm and can help to improve the effectiveness of MR guided TRUS biopsy procedures.

An Ex Vivo Phantom Validation Study of an MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Device for Targeted Prostate Biopsy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the ex vivo accuracy of an MRI-TRUS fusion device for guiding targeted prostate biopsies, to identify the origin of errors, and to evaluate the likelihood that lesions can be accurately targeted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three prostate phantoms were used to perform 27 biopsies using transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion. All phantoms underwent 3-T MRI. The prostate contour and nine lesions were delineated onto the MRI. A 3D-US dataset was generated and fused with the MRI. Per lesion, one needle was virtually planned. The postbiopsy needle location was virtually registered. The needle trajectory was marked using an MRI-safe guidewire. Postinterventional MRI was performed. The coordinates of the lesion on preinterventional MRI, the virtually planned needle, the virtually registered needle, and the marked needle trajectory on postinterventional MRI were documented and used to calculate the planning error (PE), targeting error (TE), and overall error (OE). Using the OE in the transversal plane, an upper one-sided tolerance interval was calculated to assess the likelihood that a biopsy needle was on target.

RESULTS

In the transversal plane, the mean PE, TE, and OE were 1.18, 0.39, and 2.33 mm, respectively. Using a single biopsy core, the likelihood that lesions with a diameter of 2 mm can be accurately targeted is 26%; lesions of 3 mm 61%; lesions of 4 mm 86%; lesions of 5 mm 96%; and lesions of 6 mm 99%. The likelihood of accurate sampling increases if more biopsy cores are used.

CONCLUSION

MRI-TRUS fusion allows for accurate sampling of MRI-identified lesions with an OE of 2.33 mm. Lesions with a diameter of 3 mm or more can be accurately targeted. These results should be considered the lower limit of in vivo accuracy.

The current and future role of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer detection and management

Purpose

Accurate detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PC) and correct risk attribution are essential to individually counsel men with PC. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) facilitates correct localization of index lesions within the prostate and MRI-targeted prostate biopsy (TPB) helps to avoid the shortcomings of conventional biopsy such as false-negative results or underdiagnosis of aggressive PC. In this review we summarize the different sequences of mpMRI, characterize the possibilities of incorporating MRI in the biopsy workflow and outline the performance of targeted and systematic cores in significant cancer detection. Furthermore, we outline the potential of MRI in patients undergoing active surveillance (AS) and in the pre-operative setting.

Materials and methods

An electronic MEDLINE/PubMed search up to February 2015 was performed. English language articles were reviewed for inclusion ability and data were extracted, analyzed and summarized.

Results

Targeted biopsies significantly outperform conventional systematic biopsies in the detection of significant PC and are not inferior when compared to transperineal saturation biopsies. MpMRI can detect index lesions in app. 90% of cases as compared to prostatectomy specimen. The diagnostic performance of biparametric MRI (T2w + DWI) is not inferior to mpMRI, offering options to diminish cost- and time-consumption. Since app 10% of significant lesions are still MRI-invisible, systematic cores seem to be necessary. In-bore biopsy and MRI/TRUS-fusion-guided biopsy tend to be superior techniques compared to cognitive fusion. In AS, mpMRI avoids underdetection of significant PC and confirms low-risk disease accurately. In higher-risk disease, pre-surgical MRI can change the clinically-based surgical plan in up to a third of cases.

Conclusions

mpMRI and targeted biopsies are able to detect significant PC accurately and mitigate insignificant PC detection. As long as the negative predictive value (NPV) is still imperfect, systematic cores should not be omitted for optimal staging of disease. The potential to correctly classify aggressiveness of disease in AS patients and to guide and plan prostatectomy is evolving.

Recent advances in image-guided targeted prostate biopsy

Prostate cancer is a common malignancy in the United States that results in over 30,000 deaths per year. The current state of prostate cancer diagnosis, based on PSA screening and sextant biopsy, has been criticized for both overdiagnosis of low-grade tumors and underdiagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancers (Gleason score ≥7). Recently, image guidance has been added to perform targeted biopsies of lesions detected on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scans. These methods have improved the ability to detect clinically significant cancer, while reducing the diagnosis of low-grade tumors. Several approaches have been explored to improve the accuracy of image-guided targeted prostate biopsy, including in-bore MRI-guided, cognitive fusion, and MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy. This review will examine recent advances in these image-guided targeted prostate biopsy techniques.

Evaluation of the 'Prostate Interdisciplinary Communication and Mapping Algorithm for Biopsy and Pathology' (PIC-MABP)

INTRODUCTION

Experience from interdisciplinary cooperation revealed the need for a prostate mapping scheme to communicate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) findings between radiologists, urologists, and pathologists, which should be detailed, yet easy to memorize. For this purpose, the 'Prostate interdisciplinary communication and mapping algorithm for biopsy and pathology' (PIC-MABP) was developed. This study evaluated the accuracy of the PIC-MABP system.

METHODS

PIC-MABP was tested and validated in findings of 10 randomly selected patients from routine clinical practise with 18 histologically proven cancer lesions. Patients received an mpMRI of the prostate prior to prostatectomy. After surgery the prostates were prepared as whole-mount step sections. Cancer lesions, which were found suspicious on mpMRI, were assigned to the according PIC-MABP sectors by a radiologist. MpMRI slides were masked and sent to seven urologists from different centres, providing only the PIC-MABP location of each lesion. Urologists marked the accordant regions. Then mpMRI slides were unmasked, and the correctness of each mark was evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventeen of the 126 marks (93%) were correctly assigned. Detection rates differed for lesions >0.5 cc compared with lesions <0.5 cc (p < 0.005): 3/7 (43%) marks were correctly assigned in lesions <0.3 cc, 16/21 (76%) in lesions with 0.3-0.5 cc, and 98/98 (100%) in lesions >0.5 cc. Interobserver agreement was good for lesions >0.5 cc and poor for lesions <0.3 cc (Fleiss Kappa 1 vs. 0.0175).

CONCLUSION

PIC-MABP seems to be a reliable system to communicate the location of mpMRI findings >0.5 cc between different disciplines and can be a useful guidance for cognitive mpMRI/TRUS fusion biopsy.

Design of a Dedicated Five Degree-of-Freedom Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compatible Robot for Image Guided Prostate Biopsy

In order to improve the current clinical application of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided prostate biopsies, a new, fully magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-compatible solution has been developed. This solution consists of a five degree-of-freedom (5DOF) pneumatic robot, a programmable logic controller (PLC), and a software application for visualization and robot control. The robot can be freely positioned on the MR table. For the calibration of the robot and MR coordinate system, the robot’s needle guide (NG) is used. The software application supports the calibration with image segmentation and graphic overlays and guides the user through the interventional planning process. After selecting a target point, the application calculates the needed movements via solving the kinematics of the robot and translating the adjustment into commands for the PLC driving the step motors of the robot. In case further adjustments are required, the software also allows for manual control of the robot, to position the NG according to the acquired MR images.

Prognostic Utility of PET in Prostate Cancer

Many standard nonimaging-based prediction tools exist for prostate cancer. However, these tools may be limited in individual cases and need updating based on the improved understanding of the underlying complex biology of the disease and the emergence of the novel targeted molecular imaging methods. A new platform of automated predictive tools that combines the independent molecular, imaging, and clinical information can contribute significantly to patient care. Such a platform will also be of interest to regulatory agencies and payers as more emphasis is placed on supporting those interventions that have quantifiable and significant beneficial impact on patient outcome.

Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System and Likert Scoring System: Multiparametric MR Imaging Validation Study to Screen Patients for Initial Biopsy

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-based Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and a Likert scale in the detection of prostate cancer in a cohort of patients undergoing initial prostate biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This institutional review board-approved two-center prospective study included 118 patients with normal digital rectal examination (DRE) results but elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (4-20 ng/mL) who were referred for initial prostate biopsies and had one suspicious (Likert scale score, ≥3) focus at prebiopsy 1.5-T multiparametric MR imaging performed with T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted [DW], and dynamic contrast material-enhanced imaging. Targeted core biopsies and random systematic core biopsies were performed. The elementary unit for analysis was the core. Relationships were assessed by using the Mann-Whitney U test. Yates corrected and Pearson χ(2) tests were used to evaluate categoric variables. A training set was randomly drawn to construct the receiver operating characteristic curves for the summed PI-RADS scores and for the Likert scale scores. The thresholds to recommend biopsy were obtained from the Youden J statistics and were tested in the remaining validation set in terms of predictive characteristics. Interobserver variability was analyzed by using weighed κ statistics in a random set of 50 patients.

RESULTS

Higher T2-weighted, DW, and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging PI-RADS scores were observed in areas that yielded cancer-positive cores. The percentage of positive cores increased with the sum of scores aggregated in five classes as follows: For summed PI-RADS scores of 3-5, the percentage of positive cores was 2.3%; for scores of 6-8, it was 5.8%; for scores of 9 or 10, it was 24.7%; for scores of 11 or 12, it was 51.8%; and for scores of 13-15, it was 72.1% (P for trend, <.0001). For the threshold of summed PI-RADS scores of 9 or greater, sensitivity was 86.6%, specificity was 82.4%, the positive predictive value was 52.4%, the negative predictive value was 96.5%, and accuracy was 83.2%. The respective data for Likert scale scores of 3 or greater were 93.8%, 73.6%, 44.3%, 98.1%, and 73.3%. Good interobserver agreement was observed for the Likert scale (κ = 0.80) and the summed PI-RADS (κ = 0.73) scoring systems.

CONCLUSION

PI-RADS provided the site-specific stratified risk of cancer-positive cores in biopsy-naive men with normal DRE results and elevated PSA levels. There was no significant difference between summed PI-RADS scores of 9 or greater and Likert scale scores of 3 or greater in the detection of cancer in the peripheral zone.

Detection of significant prostate cancer with magnetic resonance targeted biopsies--should transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion guided biopsies alone be a standard of care?

PURPOSE

Magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsies were suggested to detect significant cancer with more accuracy than systematic biopsies. In this study we evaluate the pathological characteristics of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging detected and undetected tumor foci on radical prostatectomy specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We selected 125 consecutive patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed on magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound targeted biopsy and/or systematic biopsy. On multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging each suspicious area was graded according to the PI-RADS score. On radical prostatectomy specimen, tumor foci with a Gleason score greater than 3+3 and/or tumor volume greater than 0.5 ml were considered significant. A correlation analysis between multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and pathological findings was performed.

RESULTS

Pathological analysis of radical prostatectomy specimens detected 230 tumor foci. Of these, 137 were considered significant (Gleason score greater than 3+3 in 112) and were observed in 111 (89%) glands. A total of 95 individual tumor foci, including 14 significant foci, were missed with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. All of them were located in glands where another focus was detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. An additional 9 individual tumor foci, including 7 significant, were detected on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging but missed with targeted biopsy, resulting in 5 (4%) significant cancers undetected with magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy. The magnetic resonance imaging target largest diameter was associated with high volume (greater than 0.5 cc) foci detection, while PI-RADS score and cancer involvement on targeted biopsy were associated with significant foci detection.

CONCLUSIONS

In these series of men with suspicious prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings, magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion guided targeted biopsy alone strategy would have resulted in the under detection of only 4% significant cancers.