Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography and gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: direct comparison and a meta-analysis

LI-RADS v2018 category and imaging features: inter-modality agreement between contrast-enhanced CT, gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI, and extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI

PURPOSE

To perform an intra-individual comparison of LI-RADS category and imaging features in patients at high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on contrast-enhanced CT, gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI), and extracellular agent-enhanced MRI (ECA-MRI) and to analyze the diagnostic performance of each imaging modality.

METHOD

This retrospective study included cirrhotic patients with at least one LR-3, LR-4, LR-5, LR-M or LR-TIV observation imaged with at least two imaging modalities among CT, EOB-MRI, or ECA-MRI. Two radiologists evaluated the observations using the LI-RADS v2018 diagnostic algorithm. Reference standard included pathologic confirmation and imaging criteria according to LI-RADS v2018. Imaging features were compared between different exams using the McNemar test. Inter-modality agreement was calculated by using the weighted Cohen's kappa (k) test.

RESULTS

A total of 144 observations (mean size 34.0 ± 32.4 mm) in 96 patients were included. There were no significant differences in the detection of major and ancillary imaging features between the three imaging modalities. When considering all the observations, inter-modality agreement for category assignment was substantial between CT and EOB-MRI (k 0.60; 95%CI 0.44, 0.75), moderate between CT and ECA-MRI (k 0.46; 95%CI 0.22, 0.69) and substantial between EOB-MRI and ECA-MRI (k 0.72; 95%CI 0.59, 0.85). In observations smaller than 20 mm, inter-modality agreement was fair between CT and EOB-MRI (k 0.26; 95%CI 0.05, 0.47), moderate between CT and ECA-MRI (k 0.42; 95%CI -0.02, 0.88), and substantial between EOB-MRI and ECA-MRI (k 0.65; 95%CI 0.47, 0.82). ECA-MRI demonstrated the highest sensitivity (70%) and specificity (100%) when considering LR-5 as predictor of HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

Inter-modality agreement between CT, ECA-MRI, and EOB-MRI decreases in observations smaller than 20 mm. ECA-MRI has the provided higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of HCC.

New liver window width in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma on dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography with deep learning reconstruction

Changing a window width (WW) alters appearance of noise and contrast of CT images. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of adjusted WW for deep learning reconstruction (DLR) in detecting hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) on CT with DLR. This retrospective study included thirty-five patients who underwent abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced CT. DLR was used to reconstruct arterial, portal, and delayed phase images. The investigation of the optimal WW involved two blinded readers. Then, five other blinded readers independently read the image sets for detection of HCCs and evaluation of image quality with optimal or conventional liver WW. The optimal WW for detection of HCC was 119 (rounded to 120 in the subsequent analyses) Hounsfield unit (HU), which was the average of adjusted WW in the arterial, portal, and delayed phases. The average figures of merit for the readers for the jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis to detect HCC were 0.809 (reader 1/2/3/4/5, 0.765/0.798/0.892/0.764/0.827) in the optimal WW (120 HU) and 0.765 (reader 1/2/3/4/5, 0.707/0.769/0.838/0.720/0.791) in the conventional WW (150 HU), and statistically significant difference was observed between them (p < 0.001). Image quality in the optimal WW was superior to those in the conventional WW, and significant difference was seen for some readers (p < 0.041). The optimal WW for detection of HCC was narrower than conventional WW on dynamic contrast-enhanced CT with DLR. Compared with the conventional liver WW, optimal liver WW significantly improved detection performance of HCC.

Is there added value of the hepatobiliary phase of MRI with hepatobiliary contrast agents for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis? A meta-analysis

Purpose

So far, there have been published several meta-analyses which focused on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection with hepatobiliary phase (HBP) contrast agents. However, only a few of them aimed at establishing whether there is any added value of the HBP itself for HCC diagnosis. To answer the question, we performed a systematic literature search with the time limit going back to 2010.

Material and methods

True positive, false positive, false negative, and true negative values with and without the HBP were extracted from the included studies. Pooled sensitivities and specificities with and without the HBP were calculated and summary receiver operating characteristics curves were drawn to assess the diagnostic performance of the studies with and without the HBP.

Results

A total of 13 studies were included involving 1184 HCC lesions. In 13 studies without the HBP, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.83, 0.89 and 0.94 respectively. In 13 studies with the HBP, the pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 0.91, 0.85 and 0.98 respectively.

Conclusions

We found no statistically significant differences in sensitivities between studies with and without the HBP (p = 0.1651).

Prediction power of radiomics in early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Raiomics is an emerging auxiliary diagnostic tool, but there are still differences in whether it can be applied to predict early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to systematically evaluate the predictive power of radiomics in the early recurrence (ER) of HCC.

METHODS

Comprehensive studies on the application of radiomics to predict ER in HCC patients after hepatectomy or curative ablation were systematically screened in Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science.

RESULTS

Ten studies which is involving a total of 1929 patients were reviewed. The overall estimates of radiomic models for sensitivity and specificity in predicting the ER of HCC were 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-0.87) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73-0.90), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

The imaging method is a reliable method for diagnosing HCC. Radiomics, which is based on medical imaging, has excellent power in predicting the ER of HCC. With the help of radiomics, we can predict the recurrence of HCC after surgery more effectively and provide a useful reference for clinical practice.

The comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI LI-RADS for nodules ≤2 cm in patients at high risk for HCC: a prospective study

Objectives

To investigate the consistency of LI-RADS of CEUS and EOB-MRI in the categorization of liver nodules ≤2cm in patients at high risk for HCC.

Methods

Patients at high risk for HCC with nodules ≤2cm who underwent CEUS and EOB-MRI in our hospital were prospectively enrolled. The CEUS images and EOB-MRI imaging of each liver nodule were observed to evaluate inter-observer consistency and category according to CEUS LI-RADS V2017 and CT/MRI LI-RADS V2017 criteria double blinded. Pathology and/or follow-up were used as reference standard.

Results

A total of 127 nodules in 119 patients met the inclusion criteria. The inter-observer agreement was good on CEUS and EOB-MRI LI-RADS (kappa = 0.76, 0.76 p < 0.001). The inter-modality agreement was fair (kappa=0.21, p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in PPV and specificity between CEUS and EOB-MRI LR-5 for HCC, while the difference in AUC was statistically significant. We used new criteria (CEUS LR-5 and EOB-MRI LR-4/5 or CEUS LR-4/5 and EOB-MRI LR-5) to diagnose HCC. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of this criteria was 63.4%, 95.6%, and 0.80.

Conclusions

CEUS and EOB-MRI showed fair inter-modality agreement in LI-RADS categorization of nodules ≤2 cm. The inter-observer agreement of CEUS and EOB-MRI LI-RADS were substantial. CEUS and EOB-MRI LR-5 have equally good positive predictive value and specificity for HCC ≤ 2cm, and combining these two modalities may better diagnose HCC ≤ 2 cm.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT04212286.

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 category 5 for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We performed an updated meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) 5 category for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using LI-RADS version 2018 (v2018), and to evaluate differences by imaging modalities and type of MRI contrast material.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for studies reporting the performance of LR-5 using v2018 for diagnosing HCC. A bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled per-observation sensitivity and specificity. Subgroup analysis was performed based on imaging modalities and type of MRI contrast material.

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies qualified for the meta-analysis, comprising 9031 patients, 10,547 observations, and 7216 HCCs. The pooled per-observation sensitivity and specificity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCC were 66% (95% CI, 61-70%) and 91% (95% CI, 89-93%), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, MRI with extracellular agent (ECA-MRI) showed significantly higher pooled sensitivity (77% [95% CI, 70-82%]) than CT (66% [95% CI, 58-73%]; p = 0.023) or MRI with gadoxetate (Gx-MRI) (65% [95% CI, 60-70%]; p = 0.001), but there was no significant difference between ECA-MRI and MRI with gadobenate (gadobenate-MRI) (73% [95% CI, 61-82%]; p = 0.495). Pooled specificities were 88% (95% CI, 80-93%) for CT, 92% (95% CI, 86-95%) for ECA-MRI, 93% (95% CI, 91-95%) for Gx-MRI, and 91% (95% CI, 84-95%) for gadobenate-MRI without significant differences (p = 0.084-0.803).

CONCLUSIONS

LI-RADS v2018 LR-5 provides high specificity for HCC diagnosis regardless of modality or contrast material, while ECA-MRI showed higher sensitivity than CT or Gx-MRI.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Refinement of the criteria for improving sensitivity while maintaining high specificity of LR-5 for HCC diagnosis may be an essential future direction.

KEY POINTS

• The pooled per-observation sensitivity and specificity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCC using LI-RADSv2018 were 66% and 91%, respectively. • ECA-MRI showed higher sensitivity than CT (77% vs 66%, p = 0.023) or Gx-MRI (77% vs 65%, p = 0.001). • LI-RADS v2018 LR-5 provides high specificity (88-93%) for HCC diagnosis regardless of modality or contrast material type.

Liver Lesions at Risk of Transformation into Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients: Hepatobiliary Phase Hypointense Nodules without Arterial Phase Hyperenhancement

Recent technical advances in liver imaging and surveillance for patients at high risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have led to an increase in the detection of borderline hepatic nodules in the gray area of multistep carcinogenesis, particularly in those that are hypointense at the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) and do not show arterial phase hyperenhancement. Given their potential to transform and advance into hypervascular HCC, these nodules have progressively attracted the interest of the scientific community. To date, however, no shared guidelines have been established for the decision management of these borderline hepatic nodules. It is therefore extremely important to identify features that indicate the malignant potential of these nodules and the likelihood of vascularization. In fact, a more complete knowledge of their history and evolution would allow outlining shared guidelines for their clinical-surgical management, to implement early treatment programs and decide between a preventive curative treatment or a watchful follow-up. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on hepatic borderline nodules, particularly focusing on those imaging features which are hypothetically correlated with their malignant evolution, and to discuss current guidelines and ongoing management in clinical practice.

Effect of magnetic resonance imaging in liver metastases

This letter to the editor is a commentary on a study titled "Liver metastases: The role of magnetic resonance imaging." Exploring a noninvasive imaging evaluation system for the biological behavior of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the key to achieving precise diagnosis and treatment and improving prognosis. This review summarizes the role of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection and evaluation of liver metastases, describes its main imaging features, and focuses on the added value of the latest imaging tools (such as T1 weighted in phase imaging, T1 weighted out of phase imaging; diffusion-weighted imaging, T2 weighted imaging). In this study, I investigated the necessity and benefits of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid for HCC diagnostic testing and prognostic evaluation.

Effect of magnetic resonance imaging in liver metastases

This letter to the editor is a commentary on a study titled "Liver metastases: The role of magnetic resonance imaging." Exploring a noninvasive imaging evaluation system for the biological behavior of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the key to achieving precise diagnosis and treatment and improving prognosis. This review summarizes the role of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection and evaluation of liver metastases, describes its main imaging features, and focuses on the added value of the latest imaging tools (such as T1 weighted in phase imaging, T1 weighted out of phase imaging; diffusion-weighted imaging, T2 weighted imaging). In this study, I investigated the necessity and benefits of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid for HCC diagnostic testing and prognostic evaluation.

Meta-analysis of the GALAD model for diagnosing primary hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Ever since the GALAD (gender-age-Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive alpha-fetoprotein-alpha-fetoprotein-des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin) logistic regression model was established to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there has been no high-level evidence that evaluates and summarizes it.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic ability of the GALAD model.

METHODS

The following databases were systematically searched for original diagnostic studies on HCC: PubMed, Embase, Medline, the Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Wanfang (China), Wiper and the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database. After screening the search results according to our criteria, the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was used to evaluate the methodologic qualities, and statistical software were used to output the statistics.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 10 studies were included and analyzed. The results revealed the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the GALAD model to be 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82, 0.90) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.92), respectively, for all-stage HCC. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.94. For early-stage HCC, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the GALAD model were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.87) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.83), respectively. The AUC was 0.90.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis confirmed that the GALAD model has excellent diagnostic performance for early-stage and all-stage HCC and can maintain high sensitivity and specificity in early-stage HCC. Therefore, the GALAD model is qualified for screening early-stage canceration from chronic liver disease.

Liquid biopsy using cell-free DNA in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma ranks fourth in cancer-related causes of death worldwide and second in China. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at the early stage have a better prognosis compared to HCC patients at the late stage. Therefore, early screening for HCC is critical for clinical treatment decisions and improving the prognosis of patients. Ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and serum alpha fetoprotein (AFP) have been used to screen HCC, but HCC is still difficult to be diagnosed in the early stage due to the low sensitivity of the above methods. It is urgent to find a method with high sensitivity and specificity for the early diagnosis of HCC. Liquid biopsy is a noninvasive detection method using blood or other bodily fluids. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are important biomarkers for liquid biopsy. Recently, HCC screening methods using the application of cfDNA and ctDNA have become the hot spot of early HCC diagnostics. In this mini review, we summarize the latest research progress of liquid biopsy based on blood cfDNA in early screening of HCC.

Screening and Early Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Cancer and Optimization of Diagnostic Imaging Techniques: A Review and Conclusion of the Expert Panel

Аim: to describe modern approaches for screening and early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Key points. Screening for HCC in high-risk groups (cirrhosis of any etiology, patients with chronic viral hepatitis B and patients with F3 liver fibrosis) should be organized as regular (every 6 months) liver ultrasound in combination with determination of the serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level. At an AFP level of ≥ 20 ng/ml, even in the absence of changes according to ultrasound data, it is advisable to perform MRI with a hepatospecific contrast agent (gadoxetic acid) which makes it possible to detect very small focal liver lesions. If focal liver lesions of 1–2 cm are detected on ultrasound, additional imaging of the liver using MRI with a hepatospecific contrast agent gadoxetic acid helps to identify HCC at an earlier stage or high degree dysplastic nodes. When planning surgical treatment and liver transplantation, it is preferable to use MRI with a hepatospecific contrast agent, since the presence of the hepatobiliary phase may allow the detection of additional smaller focal liver lesions and assess the nature of the focal liver lesion. When a patient is included in the waiting list for liver transplantation, the optimal frequency of liver MRI is 1 time in 3 months.

Conclusion. MRI with hepatospecific contrast agent gadoxetic acid is effective in screening, early diagnosis and treatment planning for HCC.

Prospective evaluation of Gadoxetate-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma detection and transplant eligibility assessment with explant histopathology correlation

BACKGROUND

We aimed to prospectively compare the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) and contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection and liver transplant (LT) eligibility assessment in cirrhotic patients with explant histopathology correlation.

METHODS

In this prospective, single-institution ethics-approved study, 101 cirrhotic patients were enrolled consecutively from the pre-LT clinic with written informed consent. Patients underwent CECT and EOB-MRI alternately every 3 months until LT or study exclusion. Two blinded radiologists independently scored hepatic lesions on CECT and EOB-MRI utilizing the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2018. Liver explant histopathology was the reference standard. Pre-LT eligibility accuracies with EOB-MRI and CECT as per Milan criteria (MC) were assessed in reference to post-LT explant histopathology. Lesion-level and patient-level statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Sixty patients (49 men; age 33-72 years) underwent LT successfully. One hundred four non-treated HCC and 42 viable HCC in previously treated HCC were identified at explant histopathology. For LR-4/5 category lesions, EOB-MRI had a higher pooled sensitivity (86.7% versus 75.3%, p <  0.001) but lower specificity (84.6% versus 100%, p <  0.001) compared to CECT. EOB-MRI had a sensitivity twice that of CECT (65.9% versus 32.2%, p <  0.001) when all HCC identified at explant histopathology were included in the analysis instead of imaging visible lesions only. Disregarding the hepatobiliary phase resulted in a significant drop in EOB-MRI performance (86.7 to 72.8%, p <  0.001). EOB-MRI had significantly lower pooled sensitivity and specificity versus CECT in the LR5 category with lesion size < 2 cm (50% versus 79%, p = 0.002 and 88.9% versus 100%, p = 0.002). EOB-MRI had higher sensitivity (84.8% versus 75%, p <  0.037) compared to CECT for detecting < 2 cm viable HCC in treated lesions. Accuracies of LT eligibility assessment were comparable between EOB-MRI (90-91.7%, p = 0.156) and CECT (90-95%, p = 0.158).

CONCLUSION

EOB-MRI had superior sensitivity for HCC detection; however, with lower specificity compared to CECT in LR4/5 category lesions while it was inferior to CECT in the LR5 category under 2 cm. The accuracy for LT eligibility assessment based on MC was not significantly different between EOB-MRI and CECT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03342677 , Registered: November 17, 2017.

Diagnostic performance of CT versus MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category 5 for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

OBJECTIVE

To compare the performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category 5 (LR-5) for diagnosing HCC between CT and MRI using comparative studies.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to April 21, 2021, to identify studies that directly compare the diagnostic performance of LR-5 for HCC between CT and MRI. A bivariate random-effects model was fitted to calculate the pooled per-observation sensitivity and specificity of LR-5 of each modality, and compare the pooled estimates of paired data. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the MRI contrast agent.

RESULTS

Seven studies with 1145 observations (725 HCCs) were included in the final analysis. The pooled per-observation sensitivity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCC was higher using MRI (61%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 43-76%; I² = 95%) than CT (48%; 95% CI, 31-65%; I² = 97%) (p < 0.001). The pooled per-observation specificities of LR-5 did not show statistically significant difference between CT (96%; 95% CI, 92-98%; I² = 0%) and MRI (93%; 95% CI, 88-96%; I² = 16%) (p = 0.054). In the subgroup analysis, extracellular contrast agent-enhanced MRI showed significantly higher pooled per-observation sensitivity than gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for diagnosing HCC (73% [95% CI, 55-85%] vs. 55% [95% CI, 39-70%]; p = 0.007), without a significant difference in specificity (93% [95% CI, 80-98%] vs. 94% [95% CI, 87-97%]; p = 0.884).

CONCLUSIONS

The LR-5 of MRI showed significantly higher pooled per-observation sensitivity than CT for diagnosing HCC. The pooled per-observation specificities of LR-5 were comparable between the two modalities.

KEY POINTS

• The pooled sensitivity of LR-5 using MRI was higher than that using CT (61% versus 48%), but the pooled specificities of LR-5 were not significantly different between CT and MRI (96% versus 93%). • Subgroup analysis according to the MRI contrast media showed a significantly higher pooled per-observation sensitivity using ECA-enhanced MRI than with EOB-enhanced MRI (73% versus 55%), and comparable specificities (93% versus 94%). • Although LI-RADS provides a common diagnostic algorithm for CT or MRI, the per-observation performance of LR-5 can be affected by the imaging modality as well as the MRI contrast agent.

Utility of Wavelet Denoising with Geometry Factor Weighting for Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Hepatobiliary-phase MR Imaging

PURPOSE

The wavelet denoising with geometry factor weighting (g-denoising) method can reduce the image noise by adapting to spatially varying noise levels induced by parallel imaging. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical applicability of g-denoising on hepatobiliary-phase (HBP) images with gadoxetic acid.

METHODS

We subjected 53 patients suspected of harboring hepatic neoplastic lesions to gadoxetic acid-enhanced HBP imaging with and without g-denoising (g⁺HBP and g^-HBP). The matrix size was reduced for g⁺HBP images to avoid prolonging the scanning time. Two radiologists calculated the SNR, the portal vein-, and paraspinal muscle contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) relative to the hepatic parenchyma (liver-to-portal vein- and liver-to-muscle CNR). Two other radiologists independently graded the sharpness of the liver edge, the visibility of intrahepatic vessels, the image noise, the homogeneity of liver parenchyma, and the overall image quality using a 5-point scale. Differences between g^-HBP and g⁺HBP images were determined with the two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

The liver-to-portal- and liver-to-muscle CNR and the SNR were significantly higher on g⁺HBP- than g^-HBP images (P < 0.01), as was the qualitative score for the image noise, homogeneity of liver parenchyma, and overall image quality (P < 0.01). Although there were no significant differences in the scores for the sharpness of the liver edge or the score assigned for the visibility of intrahepatic vessels (P = 0.05, 0.43), with g⁺HBP the score was lower in three patients for the sharpness of the liver edge and in six patients for the visibility of intrahepatic vessels.

CONCLUSION

At gadoxetic acid-enhanced HBP imaging, g-denoising yielded a better image quality than conventional HBP imaging although the anatomic details may be degraded.

Extrahepatic Disease in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Do We Always Need Whole-Body CT or Is Liver MRI Sufficient? A Subanalysis of the SORAMIC Trial

Background: To investigate whole-body contrast-enhanced CT and hepatobiliary contrast liver MRI for the detection of extrahepatic disease (EHD) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to quantify the impact of EHD on therapy decision. Methods: In this post-hoc analysis of the prospective phase II open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled SORAMIC trial, two blinded readers independently analyzed the whole-body contrast-enhanced CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI data sets of 538 HCC patients. EHD (defined as tumor manifestation outside the liver) detection rates of the two imaging modalities were compared using multiparametric statistical tests. In addition, the most appropriate treatment recommendation was determined by a truth panel. Results: EHD was detected significantly more frequently in patients with portal vein infiltration (21% vs. 10%, p < 0.001), macrovascular infiltration (22% vs. 9%, p < 0.001), and bilobar liver involvement (18% vs. 9%, p = 0.006). Further on, the maximum lesion diameter in patients with EHD was significantly higher (8.2 cm vs. 5.8 cm, p = 0.002). CT detected EHD in significantly more patients compared to MRI in both reader groups (p < 0.001). Higher detection rates of EHD in CT led to a change in management only in one patient since EHD was predominantly present in patients with locally advanced HCC, in whom palliative treatment is the standard of care. Conclusions: Whole-body contrast-enhanced CT shows significantly higher EHD detection rates compared to hepatobiliary contrast liver MRI. However, the higher detection rate did not yield a significant impact on patient management in advanced HCC.

Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma occurs mostly in people with chronic liver disease and ranks sixth in terms of global incidence of cancer, and third in terms of cancer deaths. In clinical practice, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used as a second-line diagnostic imaging modality to confirm the presence of focal liver lesions suspected as hepatocellular carcinoma on prior diagnostic test such as abdominal ultrasound or alpha-fetoprotein, or both, either in surveillance programmes or in clinical settings. According to current guidelines, a single contrast-enhanced imaging study (computed tomography (CT) or MRI) showing typical hallmarks of hepatocellular carcinoma in people with cirrhosis is considered valid to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma. The detection of hepatocellular carcinoma amenable to surgical resection could improve the prognosis. However, a significant number of hepatocellular carcinomas do not show typical hallmarks on imaging modalities, and hepatocellular carcinoma may, therefore, be missed. There is no clear evidence of the benefit of surveillance programmes in terms of overall survival: the conflicting results can be a consequence of inaccurate detection, ineffective treatment, or both. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of MRI may clarify whether the absence of benefit could be related to underdiagnosis. Furthermore, an assessment of the accuracy of MRI in people with chronic liver disease who are not included in surveillance programmes is needed for either ruling out or diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES

Primary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and at any stage in adults with chronic liver disease. Secondary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, and to identify potential sources of heterogeneity in the results.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Diagnostic Test of Accuracy Studies Register, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and three other databases to 9 November 2021. We manually searched articles retrieved, contacted experts, handsearched abstract books from meetings held during the last 10 years, and searched for literature in OpenGrey (9 November 2021). Further information was requested by e-mails, but no additional information was provided. No data was obtained through correspondence with investigators. We applied no language or document-type restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, with cross-sectional designs, using one of the acceptable reference standards, such as pathology of the explanted liver and histology of resected or biopsied focal liver lesion with at least a six-month follow-up.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and applicability concerns, using the QUADAS-2 checklist. We presented the results of sensitivity and specificity, using paired forest plots, and we tabulated the results. We used a hierarchical meta-analysis model where appropriate. We presented uncertainty of the accuracy estimates using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We double-checked all data extractions and analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 34 studies, with 4841 participants. We judged all studies to be at high risk of bias in at least one domain because most studies used different reference standards, often inappropriate to exclude the presence of the target condition, and the time interval between the index test and the reference standard was rarely defined. Regarding applicability, we judged 15% (5/34) of studies to be at low concern and 85% (29/34) of studies to be at high concern mostly owing to characteristics of the participants, most of whom were on waiting lists for orthotopic liver transplantation, and due to pathology of the explanted liver being the only reference standard. MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage: sensitivity 84.4% (95% CI 80.1% to 87.9%) and specificity 93.8% (95% CI 90.1% to 96.1%) (34 studies, 4841 participants; low-certainty evidence). MRI for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: sensitivity 84.3% (95% CI 77.6% to 89.3%) and specificity 92.9% (95% CI 88.3% to 95.9%) (16 studies, 2150 participants; low-certainty evidence). The observed heterogeneity in the results remains mostly unexplained. The sensitivity analyses, which included only studies with clearly prespecified positivity criteria and only studies in which the reference standard results were interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test, showed no variation in the results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found that using MRI as a second-line imaging modality to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage, 16% of people with hepatocellular carcinoma would be missed, and 6% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would be unnecessarily treated. For resectable hepatocellular carcinoma, we found that 16% of people with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma would improperly not be resected, while 7% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would undergo inappropriate surgery. The uncertainty resulting from the high risk of bias in the included studies and concerns regarding their applicability limit our ability to confidently draw conclusions based on our results.

A Novel Multimodal Radiomics Model for Predicting Prognosis of Resected Hepatocellular Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To explore a new model to predict the prognosis of liver cancer based on MRI and CT imaging data.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 103 patients with histologically proven hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was conducted. Patients were randomly divided into training (n = 73) and validation (n = 30) groups. A total of 1,217 radiomics features were extracted from regions of interest on CT and MR images of each patient. Univariate Cox regression, Spearman's correlation analysis, Pearson's correlation analysis, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox analysis were used for feature selection in the training set, multivariate Cox proportional risk models were established to predict disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), and the models were validated using validation cohort data. Multimodal radiomics scores, integrating CT and MRI data, were applied, together with clinical risk factors, to construct nomograms for individualized survival assessment, and calibration curves were used to evaluate model consistency. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) values were calculated to evaluate the prediction performance of the models.

RESULTS

The radiomics score established using CT and MR data was an independent predictor of prognosis (DFS and OS) in patients with HCC (p < 0.05). Prediction models illustrated by nomograms for predicting prognosis in liver cancer were established. Integrated CT and MRI and clinical multimodal data had the best predictive performance in the training and validation cohorts for both DFS [(C-index (95% CI): 0.858 (0.811-0.905) and 0.704 (0.563-0.845), respectively)] and OS [C-index (95% CI): 0.893 (0.846-0.940) and 0.738 (0.575-0.901), respectively]. The calibration curve showed that the multimodal radiomics model provides greater clinical benefits.

CONCLUSION

Multimodal (MRI/CT) radiomics models can serve as effective visual tools for predicting prognosis in patients with liver cancer. This approach has great potential to improve treatment decisions when applied for preoperative prediction in patients with HCC.

Consensus on the secondary prevention of primary liver cancer

To standardize the effective prevention, surveillance, and diagnosis of primary liver cancer, the Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association, invited clinical experts and methodologists to develop the Consensus on the Secondary Prevention of Primary Liver Cancer, which was based on the clinical and scientific advances on hepatocellular carcinoma. The purpose is to provide a current basis for the prevention, surveillance, and early diagnosis of primary liver cancer in patients with chronic liver diseases.

Computed tomography for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma occurs mostly in people with chronic liver disease and ranks sixth in terms of global incidence of cancer, and fourth in terms of cancer deaths. In clinical practice, computed tomography (CT) is used as a second-line diagnostic imaging modality to confirm the presence of focal liver lesions suspected as hepatocellular carcinoma on prior diagnostic test such as abdominal ultrasound or alpha-foetoprotein, or both, either in surveillance programmes or in clinical settings. According to current guidelines, a single contrast-enhanced imaging study CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing typical hallmarks of hepatocellular carcinoma in people with cirrhosis is valid to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma. However, a significant number of hepatocellular carcinomas do not show typical hallmarks on imaging modalities, and hepatocellular carcinoma is, therefore, missed. There is no clear evidence of the benefit of surveillance programmes in terms of overall survival: the conflicting results can be a consequence of inaccurate detection, ineffective treatment, or both. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CT may clarify whether the absence of benefit could be related to underdiagnosis. Furthermore, an assessment of the accuracy of CT in people with chronic liver disease, who are not included in surveillance programmes is needed for either ruling out or diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES

Primary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector, multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and at any stage in adults with chronic liver disease, either in a surveillance programme or in a clinical setting. Secondary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CT for the diagnosis of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Trials Register, Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Diagnostic-Test-Accuracy Studies Register, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science until 4 May 2021. We applied no language or document-type restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CT for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, with cross-sectional designs, using one of the acceptable reference standards, such as pathology of the explanted liver and histology of resected or biopsied focal liver lesion with at least a six-month follow-up.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and applicability concerns, using the QUADAS-2 checklist. We presented the results of sensitivity and specificity, using paired forest plots, and tabulated the results. We used a hierarchical meta-analysis model where appropriate. We presented uncertainty of the accuracy estimates using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We double-checked all data extractions and analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 21 studies, with a total of 3101 participants. We judged all studies to be at high risk of bias in at least one domain because most studies used different reference standards, often inappropriate to exclude the presence of the target condition, and the time-interval between the index test and the reference standard was rarely defined. Regarding applicability in the patient selection domain, we judged 14% (3/21) of studies to be at low concern and 86% (18/21) of studies to be at high concern owing to characteristics of the participants who were on waiting lists for orthotopic liver transplantation. CT for hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage: sensitivity 77.5% (95% CI 70.9% to 82.9%) and specificity 91.3% (95% CI 86.5% to 94.5%) (21 studies, 3101 participants; low-certainty evidence). CT for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: sensitivity 71.4% (95% CI 60.3% to 80.4%) and specificity 92.0% (95% CI 86.3% to 95.5%) (10 studies, 1854 participants; low-certainty evidence). In the three studies at low concern for applicability (861 participants), we found sensitivity 76.9% (95% CI 50.8% to 91.5%) and specificity 89.2% (95% CI 57.0% to 98.1%). The observed heterogeneity in the results remains mostly unexplained. The sensitivity analyses, which included only studies with clearly prespecified positivity criteria and only studies in which the reference standard results were interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test, showed no variation in the results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In the clinical pathway for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, CT has roles as a confirmatory test for hepatocellular carcinoma lesions, and for staging assessment. We found that using CT in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage, 22.5% of people with hepatocellular carcinoma would be missed, and 8.7% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would be unnecessarily treated. For resectable hepatocellular carcinoma, we found that 28.6% of people with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma would improperly not be resected, while 8% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would undergo inappropriate surgery. The uncertainty resulting from the high risk of bias in the included studies and concerns regarding their applicability limit our ability to confidently draw conclusions based on our results.

Peritumoral Dilation Radiomics of Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MRI Excellently Predicts Early Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma without Macrovascular Invasion After Hepatectomy

Background

Whether peritumoral dilation radiomics can excellently predict early recrudescence (≤2 years) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear.

Methods

Between March 2012 and June 2018, 323 pathologically confirmed HCC patients without macrovascular invasion, who underwent liver resection and preoperative gadoxetate disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA) MRI, were consecutively recruited into this study. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent clinicoradiologic predictors of 2-year recrudescence. Peritumoral dilation (tumor and peritumoral zones within 1cm) radiomics extracted features from 7-sequence images for modeling and achieved average but robust predictive performance through 5-fold cross validation. Independent clinicoradiologic predictors were then incorporated with the radiomics model for constructing a comprehensive nomogram. The predictive discrimination was quantified with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and net reclassification improvement (NRI).

Results

With the median recurrence-free survival (RFS) reaching 60.43 months, 28.2% (91/323) and 16.4% (53/323) patients suffered from early and delay relapse, respectively. Microvascular invasion, tumor size >5 cm, alanine aminotransferase >50 U/L, γ-glutamyltransferase >60 U/L, prealbumin ≤250 mg/L, and peritumoral enhancement independently impaired 2-year RFS in the clinicoradiologic model with AUC of 0.694 (95% CI 0.628–0.760). Nevertheless, these indexes were paucity of robustness (P >0.05) when integrating with 38 most recurrence-related radiomics signatures for developing the comprehensive nomogram. The peritumoral dilation radiomics—the ultimate prediction model yielded satisfactory mean AUCs (training cohort: 0.939, 95% CI 0.908–0.973; validation cohort: 0.842, 95% CI 0.736–0.951) after 5-fold cross validation and fitted well with the actual relapse status in the calibration curve. Besides, our radiomics model obtained the best clinical net benefits, with significant improvements of NRI (35.9%-66.1%, P <0.001) versus five clinical algorithms: the clinicoradiologic model, the tumor-node-metastasis classification, the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage, the preoperative and postoperative risks of Early Recurrence After Surgery for Liver tumor.

Conclusion

Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI-based peritumoral dilation radiomics is a potential preoperative biomarker for early recurrence of HCC patients without macrovascular invasion.

Advanced CT techniques for assessing hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth-most common cancer in the world, and hepatic dynamic CT studies are routinely performed for its evaluation. Ongoing studies are examining advanced imaging techniques that may yield better findings than are obtained with conventional hepatic dynamic CT scanning. Dual-energy CT-, perfusion CT-, and artificial intelligence-based methods can be used for the precise characterization of liver tumors, the quantification of treatment responses, and for predicting the overall survival rate of patients. In this review, the advantages and disadvantages of conventional hepatic dynamic CT imaging are reviewed and the general principles of dual-energy- and perfusion CT, and the clinical applications and limitations of these technologies are discussed with respect to HCC. Finally, we address the utility of artificial intelligence-based methods for diagnosing HCC.

Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (diagnostic). The objectives are as follows:

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and at any stage in people with chronic liver disease.

Comparison of LI-RADS with other non-invasive liver MRI criteria and radiological opinion for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic livers using gadoxetic acid with histopathological explant correlation

AIM

To establish the diagnostic accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and compare its performance to that of international criteria from European Assofor the Study of the Liver (EASL), Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH), Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL), and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN), and to the reporting radiologist's overall opinion regarding the probability of a nodule being a HCC by correlating with a histological diagnosis from whole liver explants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present single-centre, retrospective review selected participants based on the following criteria: adults (≥18 years) listed for liver transplantation in 2014/2015, with liver cirrhosis at the time of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with hepatocyte specific contrast agent, and at least one liver lesion ≥10 mm on MRI with histology from subsequent liver explant for comparison. Each lesion was assessed against international criteria and given a "radiologist opinion" score of 1-5 (1 = definitely benign, 5 = definitely HCC).

RESULTS

Total 268 patient records were reviewed, with 105 eligible lesions identified from 47 patients. Median lesion size was 15.5 mm (range 10-68 mm). Sensitivity (%), specificity (%), and positive predictive value (PPV; %) for LI-RADS LR5 was 45, 89, and 89, for LI-RADS LR4+5 + TIV was 61, 80, and 86, for EASL was 44, 86 and 86, for JSH/APASL was 64, 81, and 87, for OPTN was 36, 90, and 88, and for "radiologist impression" of probably or definitely HCC was 79, 79, and 88 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI has moderate sensitivity and good specificity for the diagnosis of HCC with considerable variation depending on criteria used. OPTN criteria have the best specificity, but low sensitivity. "Radiologist opinion" gives highest overall accuracy with increases in sensitivity and reduction in specificity when compared to the imaging criteria.

Comparative Study of an Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration for Liver Tumors

Objective Both a percutaneous biopsy and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) have been widely performed for liver tumors. However, no studies have compared these two biopsy methods. Method A retrospective study was conducted using medical records for patients who underwent a liver tumor biopsy from 2012 to 2019. The cases were classified into two groups for a comparison: an ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy group (percutaneous group) and an EUS-FNA group (EUS group). Results A total of 106 patients (47 in the percutaneous group and 59 in the EUS group) were included. The final diagnosis was malignant in 100 cases and benign in the remaining 6 cases. While the median lesion diameter was 62 mm in the percutaneous group, it was significantly smaller (34 mm) in the EUS group (p <0.01). The EUS group had more left lobe tumors than right lobe tumors. All cases of caudate lobe tumor (four cases) underwent EUS-FNA. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the procedure were 95%, 100%, and 96% in the percutaneous group and 100%, 100%, and 100% in the EUS group, respectively showing no significant difference. Adverse events were reported in 17% of the percutaneous group, which was significantly lower than in the EUS group (2%; p <0.01). Conclusion A percutaneous biopsy and EUS-FNA have equivalent diagnostic qualities for liver tumors, although EUS-FNA tends to be associated with fewer adverse events. A complete understanding of the characteristics of each procedure is essential when choosing the best biopsy method for each particular case.

Role of PET/CT in patients with unexplained rising alpha fetoprotein post HCC interventional management

Background

Positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET/CT) is considered a powerful modality in the follow-up of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. In this study, PET/CT was done in an evaluation of patients with unexplained rising alpha fetoprotein (AFP) post hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) interventional management in 40 patients (16 females and 24 males); their age ranged from 25 to 82 years, had undergone interventional management for HCC and underwent PET/CT follow-up within an 8-month duration from their intervention. Whole-body PET/CT was performed after injection of (18)-FDG, and the results were read in a masked manner by two specialists, and diagnostic performance was assessed from the results of consensus masked reading. All the results were evaluated with the Barcelona criteria and biopsy correlation.

Results

During the follow-up PET/CT, 24 patients had complete response and 8 patients showed focal residual while the rest 8 patients showed newly developed lesions.

Conclusion

PET/CT is an excellent method for the evaluation of HCC patients with equivocal results after interventional management.

Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS for MRI and CT detection of HCC: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To perform a meta-analysis evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category ≥ 3 (LI-RADS 3-5v) for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHOD

A systematic PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science electronic database search was performed for original diagnostic studies published through July 31, 2018. Statistical analysis included data pooling, forest plot construction, heterogeneity testing, meta-regression, and subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies (v2011, v2014 and v2017) involving 3386 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of LI-RADS ≥ 3 for diagnosing HCC were 0.86 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.78-0.91) and 0.85 (95 % CI: 0.78-0.90), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.92 (95 % CI: 0.89-0.94). Meta-regression analysis showed that the publication year, blinding to the reference standard and the number of readers were significant factors affecting heterogeneity. In subgroup analyses, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated higher sensitivity (0.82 vs. 0.73) and comparable specificity (0.79 vs. 0.78) than computed tomography (CT). For HCCs ≤30 mm, LI-RADS showed lower sensitivity of 0.72 and specificity of 0.80 compared with HCC of all sizes. LR-5 showed higher sensitivity and specificity than LR-3 (sensitivity: 0.67 vs. 0.07, P = 0.02; specificity: 0.93 vs. 0.75, p < 0.001) and higher sensitivity than LR-4 (sensitivity: 0.67 vs. 0.29, P = 0.02; specificity: 0.93 vs. 0.80, p = 0.75). LR ≥ 5 had higher specificity at the cost of decreased sensitivity than LR ≥ 3 (specificity: 0.94 vs. 0.68, p < 0.001; sensitivity: 0.66 vs. 0.74, P = 0.70) and LR ≥ 4 (specificity: 0.94 vs. 0.84, p < 0.001; sensitivity: 0.66 vs. 0.74, P = 0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

LI-RADS ≥ 3 shows high diagnostic accuracy for HCCs, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.86 and specificity of 0.85. The specificity is higher for LR-5 and LR ≥ 5. However, further prospective studies on LI-RADS ≥ 3 are needed to elucidate its value for diagnosing small HCCs (≤20 mm).

Diagnosis of Pre-HCC Disease by Hepatobiliary-Specific Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Review

We first proposed a new concept, pre-hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) disease, to describe the precancerous condition of HCC, which has received scant attention from clinicians. Pre-HCC disease is defined as chronic liver injury concurrent with hepatic low- or high-grade dysplastic nodular lesions. Precise diagnosis of pre-HCC disease may prevent or arrest HCC and contribute to relieving the HCC burden worldwide, although noninvasive diagnosis is difficult and biopsy is generally required. Fortunately, recent advances and extensive applications of hepatobiliary-specific contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging will facilitate the noninvasive identification and characterization of pre-HCC disease. This review briefly discusses the new concept of pre-HCC disease and offers an overview of the role of hepatobiliary-specific contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of pre-HCC disease.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Extracellular Contrast Detects Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Greater Accuracy Than With Gadoxetic Acid or Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used to detect hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We performed a prospective study to compare the diagnostic performance of CT, MRI with extracellular contrast agents (ECA-MRI), and MRI with hepatobiliary agents (HBA-MRI) in the detection of HCC using the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS).

METHODS

We studied 125 participants (102 men; mean age, 55.3 years) with chronic liver disease who underwent CT, ECA-MRI, or HBA-MRI (with gadoxetic acid) before surgery for a nodule initially detected by ultrasound at a tertiary center in Korea, from November 2016 through February 2019. We collected data on major features and assigned LI-RADS categories (v2018) from CT and MRI examinations. We then compared the diagnostic performance for LR-5 for each modality alone, and in combination.

RESULTS

In total, 163 observations (124 HCCs, 13 non-HCC malignancies, and 26 benign lesions; mean size, 20.7 mm) were identified. ECA-MRI detected HCC with 83.1% sensitivity and 86.6% accuracy, compared to 64.4% sensitivity and 71.8% accuracy for CT (P < .001) and 71.2% sensitivity (P = .005) and 76.5% accuracy for HBA-MRI (P = .005); all technologies detected HCC with 97.4% specificity. Adding CT to either ECA-MRI (89.2% sensitivity, 91.4% accuracy; both P < .05) or HBA-MRI (82.8% sensitivity, 86.5% accuracy; both P < .05) significantly increased its diagnostic performance in detection of HCC compared with the MRI technologies alone. ECA-MRI identified arterial phase hyperenhancement in a significantly higher proportion of patients (97.6%) than CT (81.5%; P < .001) or HBA-MRI (89.5%; P = .002). ECA-MRI identified non-peripheral washout in 79.8% of patients, vs 74.2% of patients for CT and 73.4% of patients for HBA-MRI (differences not significant). ECA-MRI identified enhancing capsules in 85.5% of patients, vs 33.9% for CT (P < .001) and 41.4% for HBA-MRI (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In a prospective study of patients with chronic liver disease and a nodule detected by ultrasound, ECA-MRI detected HCC with higher levels of sensitivity and accuracy than CT or HBA-MRI, based on LI-RADS. Diagnostic performance was best when CT was used in combination with MRI compared with MRI alone.

Imaging and Management of Liver Cancer

Imaging of primary hepatic neoplasms in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and in patients with otherwise normal livers relies on proper multiphase image acquisition technique, with emphasis on a high-quality, late arterial phase, using either CT or MRI for accurate image interpretation. The introduction of liver imaging reporting and data system in 2011, with subsequent multiple updates, the most recent in 2018, has provided standardization of image interpretation, reporting and management recommendations for liver observations in patients at risk for HCC. This review article will emphasize key points of imaging primary liver tumors with emphasis on liver imaging reporting and data system, including strengths of this system. We will also review imaging of less common primary liver tumors such as cholangiocarcinoma and angiosarcomas. Imaging pitfall associated with primary liver malignancies will be demonstrated as well as ways to mitigate them. Finally, imaging and reporting of findings following locoregional treatment of HCC will be reviewed.

BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF HEPATOLOGY UPDATED RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The Brazilian Society of Hepatology (SBH) published in 2015 its first recommendations about the management of HCC. Since then, new data have emerged in the literature, prompting the governing board of SBH to sponsor a single-topic meeting in August 2018 in São Paulo. All the invited experts were asked to make a systematic review of the literature reviewing the management of HCC in subjects with cirrhosis. After the meeting, all panelists gathered together for the discussion of the topics and the elaboration of updated recommendations. The text was subsequently submitted for suggestions and approval of all members of the Brazilian Society of Hepatology through its homepage. The present manuscript is the final version of the reviewed manuscript containing the recommendations of SBH.

Optimal Combination of Features on Gadoxetate Disodium-enhanced MR Imaging for Non-invasive Differential Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The JAMP-HCC Study

Purpose:

To determine the optimal combination of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to compare its diagnostic ability to that of dynamic computed tomography (CT) in patients with chronic liver disease.

Methods:

This multi-institutional study consisted of two parts: Study 1, a retrospective study to determine the optimal combination of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI findings (decision tree and logistic model) to distinguish HCC (n = 199) from benign (n = 81) or other malignant lesions (n = 95) (375 nodules in 269 patients) and Study 2, a prospective study to compare the diagnostic ability of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI to distinguish HCC (n = 73) from benign (n = 15) or other malignant lesions (n = 12) with that of dynamic CT (100 nodules in 83 patients). Two radiologists independently evaluated the imaging findings (Study 1 and 2) and made a practical diagnosis (Study 2).

Results:

In Study 1, rim or whole enhancement on arterial phase images, signal intensities on T₂-weighted/diffusion-weighted/portal venous/transitional/hepatobiliary phase images, and signal drop on opposed-phase images were independently useful for differential diagnosis. In Study 2, the accuracy, sensitivity, negative predictive value, and negative likelihood ratio of the CT decision tree (reader 2) were higher than those of MRI Model 2 (P = 0.015–0.033). There were no other significant differences in diagnostic ability (P = 0.059–1.000) and radiologist-made practical diagnosis (P = 0.059–1.000) between gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI and CT.

Conclusion:

We identified the optimal combination of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI findings for HCC diagnosis. However, its diagnostic ability was not superior to that of dynamic CT.

Pseudo-random Trajectory Scanning Suppresses Motion Artifacts on Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Hepatobiliary-phase Magnetic Resonance Images

Purpose:

Hepatobiliary-phase (HBP) MRI with gadoxetic acid facilitates the differentiation between lesions with and without functional hepatocytes. Thus, high-quality HBP images are required for the detection and evaluation of hepatic lesions. However, the long scan time may increase artifacts due to intestinal peristalsis, resulting in the loss of diagnostic information. Pseudo-random acquisition order disperses artifacts into the background. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical applicability of pseudo-random trajectory scanning for the suppression of motion artifacts on T₁-weighted images including HBP.

Methods:

Our investigation included computer simulation, phantom experiments, and a clinical study. For computer simulation and phantom experiments a region of interest (ROI) was placed on the area with motion artifact and the standard deviation inside the ROI was measured as image noise. For clinical study we subjected 62 patients to gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase imaging with a circular- and a pseudo-random trajectory (c-HBP and p-HBP); two radiologists graded the motion artifacts, sharpness of the liver edge, visibility of intrahepatic vessels, and overall image quality using a five-point scale where 1 = unacceptable and 5 = excellent. Differences in the qualitative scores were determined using the two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results:

The image noise was higher on the circular image compared with pseudo-random image (101.0 vs 60.9 on computer simulation image, 91.2 vs 67.7 on axial, 95.5 vs 86.9 on reformatted sagittal image for phantom experiments). For clinical study the score for motion artifacts was significantly higher with p-HBP than c-HBP imaging (left lobe: mean 3.4 vs 3.2, P < 0.01; right lobe: mean 3.6 vs 3.4, P < 0.01) as was the qualitative score for the overall image quality (mean 3.6 vs 3.3, P < 0.01).

Conclusion:

At gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase imaging, p-HBP scanning suppressed motion artifacts and yielded better image quality than c-HBP scanning.

Use of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Liver MRI and Mortality in More than 30 000 Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Nationwide Analysis

Background The impact on survival of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in addition to multiphase contrast material-enhanced CT for initial staging in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unknown. Purpose To compare all-cause mortality in patients with HCC who underwent CT only, CT plus non-gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, or CT plus gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI as part of their initial diagnostic work-up. Materials and Methods The authors performed a nationwide retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with HCC in South Korea between January 2008 and December 2010. Follow-up extended through December 2014. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards regression model with adjustment of confounding factors was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality. Results Among 30 023 patients with HCC (mean age ± standard deviation, 58.5 years ± 10.7, 23 978 men), the proportions of patients in whom HCC was diagnosed using CT only, CT plus non-gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, and CT plus gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were 56.1%, 12.9%, and 31.0%, respectively. In adjusted analysis using CT only as the reference category, the HR for mortality for CT plus gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI was 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62, 0.67; P < .001), and the HR for CT plus non-gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.75; P < .001). Use of CT plus gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI was associated with lower mortality compared with CT plus non-gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (adjusted HR, 0.90; 95% CI: 0.85, 0.95; P < .001), but this survival advantage was restricted to patients with localized disease. Conclusion In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, additional use of contrast-enhanced MRI was associated with lower mortality. Furthermore, CT plus gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI was associated with better survival than CT plus non-gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI but only in patients with localized disease. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kim in this issue.

High Acceleration Three-Dimensional T1-Weighted Dual Echo Dixon Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging Using Compressed Sensing-Sensitivity Encoding: Comparison of Image Quality and Solid Lesion Detectability with the Standard T1-Weighted Sequence

Objective

To compare a high acceleration three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted gradient-recalled-echo (GRE) sequence using the combined compressed sensing (CS)-sensitivity encoding (SENSE) method with a conventional 3D GRE sequence using SENSE, with respect to image quality and detectability of solid focal liver lesions (FLLs) in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI.

Materials and Methods

A total of 217 patients with gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI at 3T (54 in the preliminary study and 163 in the main study) were retrospectively included. In the main study, HBP imaging was done twice using the standard mDixon-3D-GRE technique with SENSE (acceleration factor [AF]: 2.8, standard mDixon-GRE) and the high acceleration mDixon-3D GRE technique using the combined CS-SENSE technique (CS-SENSE mDixon-GRE). Two abdominal radiologists assessed the two MRI data sets for image quality in consensus. Three other abdominal radiologists independently assessed the diagnostic performance of each data set and its ability to detect solid FLLs in 117 patients with 193 solid nodules and compared them using jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristics (JAFROC).

Results

There was no significant difference in the overall image quality. CS-SENSE mDixon-GRE showed higher image noise, but lesser motion artifact levels compared with the standard mDixon-GRE (all p < 0.05). In terms of lesion detection, reader-averaged figures-of-merit estimated with JAFROC was 0.918 for standard mDixon-GRE, and 0.953 for CS-SENSE mDixon-GRE (p = 0.142). The non-inferiority of CS-SENSE mDixon-GRE over standard mDixon-GRE was confirmed (difference: 0.064 [−0.012, 0.081]).

Conclusion

The CS-SENSE mDixon-GRE HBP sequence provided comparable overall image quality and non-inferior solid FFL detectability compared with the standard mDixon-GRE sequence, with reduced acquisition time.

The diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of eight prospective studies

AIM

The purpose of this study was to determine the relative diagnostic benefit of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography (CEMDCT) for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Two investigators searched multiple databases from inception to January 8, 2019, for studies comparing Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI with CEMDCT in adults suspected of HCC. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included enrolling 498 patients. MRI showed significantly higher sensitivity than CT (0.85 vs. 0.68). There was no significant difference in the specificity of MRI and CT (0.94 vs. 0.93). The negative likelihood ratio and positive likelihood ratio of MRI and CT were not significantly different (0.16 vs. 0.15 and 14.7 vs. 11.2, respectively). The summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) of MRI was higher than that of CT at 0.96 vs. 0.91. In the subgroup analysis with a lesion diameter below 2 cm, the sensitivity of MRI was significantly higher than that of CT (0.79 vs. 0.46).

CONCLUSION

Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI showed higher sensitivity and overall diagnostic accuracy than CEMDCT especially for hepatocellular carcinoma lesions smaller than 2 cm.

KEY POINTS

• Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI can detect small lesions of hepatocellular carcinoma. • Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI showed higher sensitivity and overall diagnostic accuracy than CEMDCT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. • Eight prospective studies showed that Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI provides greater diagnostic confidence.

Hepatocellular carcinoma detection in liver cirrhosis: diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced CT vs. MRI with extracellular contrast vs. gadoxetic acid

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced CT vs. MRI with extracellular contrast agents (EC-MRI) vs. MRI with gadoxetic acid (EOB-MRI) for HCC detection in patients with liver cirrhosis using liver explant as the reference. The additional value of hepatobiliary phase (HBP) post Gadoxetic acid was also assessed.

METHODS

Two-hundred seventy-seven consecutive patients who underwent liver transplantation over a 9 year period and imaging within 90 days of were retrospectively included. Imaging consisted in CT (n = 100), EC-MRI (n = 77) and EOB-MRI (n = 100), the latter subdivided into dynamic EOB-MRI and full EOB-MRI (dynamic+HBP). Three radiologists retrospectively categorized lesions ≥ 1 cm using the LI-RADSv2017 algorithm. Dynamic EOB-MRI was re-evaluated with the addition of HBP. Results were correlated with explant pathology.

RESULTS

Pathology demonstrated 265 HCCs (mean size 2.1 ± 1.4 cm) in 177 patients. Per-patient sensitivities were 86.3% for CT, 89.5% for EC-MRI, 92.8% for dynamic EOB-MRI and 95.2% for full EOB-MRI (pooled reader data), with a significant difference between CT and dynamic/full EOB-MRI (p = 0.032/0.002), and between EC-MRI and full EOB-MRI (p = 0.047). Per-lesion sensitivities for CT, EC-MRI, dynamic EOB-MRI and full EOB-MRI were 59.5%,78.5%,69.7% and 76.8%, respectively, with a significant difference between MRI groups and CT (p-range:0.001-0.04), and no difference between EC-MRI and dynamic EOB-MRI (p = 0.949). For HCCs 1-1.9 cm, sensitivities were 34.4%, 64.6%, 57.3% and 67.3%, respectively, with all MRI groups significantly superior to CT (p ≤ 0.01) and full EOB-MRI superior to dynamic EOB-MRI (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

EOB-MRI outperforms CT and EC-MRI for per-patient HCC detection sensitivity, and is equivalent to EC-MRI for per-lesion sensitivity. MRI methods outperform CT for detection of HCCs 1-1.9 cm.

KEY POINTS

• MRI is superior to CT for HCC detection in patients with liver cirrhosis. • EOB-MRI outperforms CT and MRI using extracellular contrast agents (EC-MRI) for per-patient HCC detection sensitivity, and is equivalent to EC-MRI for per-lesion sensitivity. • The addition of hepatobiliary phase images improves HCC detection when using gadoxetic acid.

Negative Predictive Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of Liver and Kidney Thermal Ablation Sites for Local Tumour Progression During Long-term Follow-up: A Retrospective Consecutive Study

PURPOSE

To determine negative predictive value (NPV) of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to demonstrate local tumour progression (LTP) at thermal ablation (TA) sites.

METHODS

Our institutional review board approved this retrospective study; acquisition of consent was waived. Consecutive CEUS examinations performed between 2004-2014 for TA site evaluation on patients who could not undergo enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or had inconclusive CT or MRI, were retrospectively reviewed. Those reported as no abnormal enhancement in or surrounding TA site were included. CEUS examination was considered true-negative based on stability or lack of enhancement/washout on follow-up imaging for at least 1 year, and false-negative (FN), if there was an arterially enhancing focus with wash-out at or surrounding TA site on subsequent follow-up imaging.

RESULTS

Study population included 56 tumours in 54 patients, 11 women, 43 men; mean age 71 years. Two patients had TA of two different hepatocellular carcinomas. Thirty-six examinations were for hepatic TA and twenty for renal TA. Lesion sizes ranged from 1 cm to 7 cm (mean 3.1 ± 1.2). Mean diameter of 7 recurrences was 13.8 mm. Overall FN rate was 12.5% (7/56). Corresponding numbers were 0% (0/20) for renal TA and 19.4% (7/36) for hepatic TA. Overall NPV of CEUS was 87.5% (49/56) (confidence interval [CI]: 78.8%-96.2%). NPV for renal TA was 100% (20/20) (CI: 100%-100%) and for hepatic TA 81.5% (29/36) (CI: 67.6 %-93.5%).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, CEUS showed high NPV for exclusion of LTP at renal TA sites. NPV for hepatic TA sites was high but lower than renal TA.

Prospective evaluation of gadoxetic acid magnetic resonance for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in newly detected nodules ≤2 cm in cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Most of the published studies about the diagnostic accuracy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance (EOB-MR) for the non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have had a retrospective design. Thus, we aimed to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EOB-MR for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in nodules ≤2 cm detected by screening ultrasound (US) in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Between July 2012 and October 2015, 62 consecutive asymptomatic Child-Pugh A-B cirrhotic patients with newly US-detected solitary nodules between 1 and 2 cm were prospectively included in the study. Hepatic extracellular contrast-enhanced MR (ECCE-MR) followed by EOB-MR were obtained in less than 1-month interval. Two independent radiologists blindly reviewed the EOB-MR studies, and the diagnosis of HCC was assigned when the lesion showed arterial enhancement followed by portal venous phase washout and/or hypointensity on the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). The final HCC diagnosis was made by ECCE-MR according to the accepted non-invasive criteria, or by biopsy in lesions with atypical vascular profile.

RESULTS

Final diagnoses were as follows: HCC (n = 41), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 2), colorectal metastases (n = 1) and benign conditions (n = 18). The sensitivity and specificity of EOB-MR for HCC diagnosis were 56.1% (95% CI: 39.7-71.5) and 90.5% (95% CI: 69.6-98.8), respectively, while sensitivity of ECCE-MR was 63.4% (95% CI: 46.9-77.9). The low rate of hypointense HCCs in the HBP and suboptimal liver uptake of contrast agent justify the low sensitivity of EOB-MR for HCC diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

EOB-MR does not surpass the diagnostic accuracy of ECCE-MR for non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in nodules ≤2 cm in cirrhotic patients.

Computed tomography for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic advanced liver disease

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Diagnostic test accuracy). The objectives are as follows:

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector, multiphasic contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of any size and at any stage in people with chronic advanced liver disease.

Use of gadoxetate disodium in patients with chronic liver disease and its implications for liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS)

Use of gadoxetate disodium, a hepatobiliary gadolinium-based agent, in patients with chronic parenchymal liver disease offers the advantage of improved sensitivity for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Imaging features of liver observations on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI may also serve as biomarkers of recurrence-free and overall survival following definitive treatment of HCC. A number of technical and interpretative pitfalls specific to gadoxetate exist, however, and needs to be recognized when protocoling and interpreting MRI exams with this agent. This article reviews the advantages and pitfalls of gadoxetate use in patients at risk for HCC, and the potential impact on Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) imaging feature assessment and categorization. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:1236-1252.

Controversies in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has evolved considerably over the last decade. Surveillance of cirrhotic patients and refinements to imaging techniques have enabled a relevant proportion of patients to be diagnosed at an early stage, when effective therapies are feasible. Resection, transplantation and ablation are all options in patients with early stage HCC. Thus, there is some controversy regarding which is the best treatment approach in challenging scenarios. There have also been major developments in locoregional therapies, particularly in intra-arterial approaches. Finally, the systemic treatment for HCC has changed dramatically following the demonstration of a survival benefit with sorafenib; there are currently several first-line (sorafenib and lenvatinib) and second-line (regorafenib, cabozantinib and ramucirumab) treatments that have shown a survival benefit. Expectations for immune checkpoint inhibitors are high, with the results of the ongoing phase III trials eagerly awaited. In this review we discuss some of the controversies in the management of HCC, focussing in particular on systemic therapy.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: State of the Art Imaging and Recent Advances

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing, with this trend expected to continue to the year 2030. Hepatocarcinogenesis follows a predictable course, which makes adequate identification and surveillance of at-risk individuals central to a successful outcome. Moreover, imaging is central to this surveillance, and ultimately to diagnosis and management. Many liver study groups throughout Asia, North America and Europe advocate a surveillance program for at-risk individuals to allow early identification of HCC. Ultrasound is the most commonly utilized imaging modality. Many societies offer guidelines on how to diagnose HCC. The Liver Image Reporting and Data System (LIRADS) was introduced to standardize the acquisition, interpretation, reporting and data collection of HCC cases. The LIRADS advocates diagnosis using multiphase computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging. The 2017 version also introduces contrast-enhanced ultrasound as a novel approach to diagnosis. Indeed, imaging techniques have evolved to improve diagnostic accuracy and characterization of HCC lesions. Newer techniques, such as T1 mapping, intravoxel incoherent motion analysis and textural analysis, assess specific characteristics that may help grade the tumor and guide management, allowing for a more personalized approach to patient care. This review aims to analyze the utility of imaging in the surveillance and diagnosis of HCC and to assess novel techniques which may increase the accuracy of imaging and determine optimal treatment strategies.

Comparison of gadoxetic acid versus gadopentetate dimeglumine for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at 1.5 T using the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS v.2017)

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to investigate the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v.2017 for the categorization of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) with gadoxetic acid compared with gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We included 141 high-risk patients with 145 pathologically-confirmed HCCs who first underwent gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced 1.5-T followed by gadoxetic acid-enhanced 1.5-T MRI. Two independent radiologists evaluated the presence or absence of major HCC features and assigned LI-RADS categories after considering ancillary features on both MRIs. Finally, the sensitivity of LI-RADS category 5 (LR-5) and the frequencies of major HCC features were compared between gadoxetic acid- and gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced 1.5-T MRI using the Wilcoxon test.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCCs was significantly different between gadoxetic acid- and gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI (73.8% [107/145] vs 26.2% [38/145], P < 0.001; 71% [103/145] vs 29% [42/145], P < 0.001 for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively). Among the major HCC LI-RADS features, capsule appearance was less frequently demonstrated on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI than on gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI (3.4% [5/145] vs 5.5% [8/145], P = 0.793; 4.1% [6/145] vs 5.5% [8/145], P = 0.87 for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively), and the frequency of arterial hyperenhancement was not significantly different between gadoxetic acid and gadopentetate dimeglumine (89% [129/145] vs 89% [129/145], P = 1.000). In addition, the frequency of a washout appearance was less in the transitional phase (TP) than in the portal venous phase (PVP) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (43% [46/107] vs 57% [61/107], P = 0.367).

CONCLUSION

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI showed a comparable sensitivity to gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of HCCs, and LI-RADS category 4 (LR-4) hepatic nodules were upgraded to LR-5 when taking into account the major features according to LI-RADS v.2017.

Negative Predictive Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Differentiating Avascular Solid-Appearing From Vascularized Masses: A Retrospective Consecutive Study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to establish the lack of vascularity in a mass.

METHODS

This work was an Institutional Review Board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant retrospective study. Acquisition of consent was waived. We included all CEUS examinations performed for tissue characterization between 2004 and 2014 that reported showing no vascularity in a mass. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings were considered true-negative when there was stability on imaging for at least 1 year or no evidence of a solid mass, if biopsied, and false-negative if there was lesion growth on imaging within 12 months or an indication of a solid mass on the pathologic examination, if biopsied. One author reviewed all of the reports and follow-up examinations. We conducted a consensus review of all false-negative findings mixed with an equal number of true-negative findings by 2 reviewers, who were blinded to the final results.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 97 CEUS examinations in 97 patients, including 48 women and 49 men (mean age ± SD, 65 ± 14 years). Examinations were performed for lesion characterization in the liver (n = 23), pancreas (n = 17), kidney (n = 54), 1 gallbladder, 1 adnexa, and 1 peritoneal lesion. The overall false-negative rate on the official prospective review was 2% (2 of 97). Two false-negative findings were correctly identified on the consensus review. The NPV of CEUS was 97.9% (95 of 97; 95% confidence interval, 93%- 99%) on the official review.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound has a very high NPV to exclude the presence of flow in a mass, and it can be used to exclude the presence of a solid mass.