Radiographic stool quantification: an equivalence study of 484 symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects

Moving beyond Symptom Criteria to Diagnose and Treat Functional Disorders: Patient-Reported Symptoms of Functional Lower Gastrointestinal Disorders Correlate Poorly with Objective Assessment of Luminal Contents Seen on Intestinal Ultrasound

Background/Objectives: The diagnosis of lower functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) is currently based on subjective and unreliable patient-reported symptoms, with significant clinical overlap between diagnosed phenotypes. Objective biomarkers are urgently sought. Gastrointestinal ultrasound (GIUS) can objectively and non-invasively assess luminal contents. This study aimed to assess the utility of GIUS in phenotyping patients with lower FGIDs. Methods: Patients with lower FGIDs underwent a GIUS and completed the Rome IV Diagnostic Questionnaire, SAGIS questionnaire, and 100 mm VAS score for overall symptom severity. The faecal loading score (FLS) was obtained using a modified Leech score, where an FLS of >37 was consistent with clinically significant constipation. Results: Eighty-eight patients fulfilled the study requirements. In total, 56 met the Rome IV criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) subtypes, while 23 met the criteria for functional constipation (FC), 4 for functional diarrhoea (FD), and 5 for other diagnoses. Patients reporting constipation-predominant symptoms had a significantly higher median FLS than those describing diarrhoea-predominant symptoms (FLS = 40 [IQR 20.0-53.3] vs. 13.3 [IQR 6.7-40.0], respectively). However, 27% of patients describing diarrhoea had significant faecal loading on GIUS, and of those who described constipation, 34% did not have significant faecal loading. Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of FLS-indicated constipation by the Rome IV criteria were low at 59% and 66%, respectively. Conclusions: The symptom-based diagnosis of FGID subtypes based on the Rome IV criteria is a poor predictor of faecal loading. These findings should prompt further exploration of the limitations of symptom-based assessment and a shift towards physiological assessment of patients with FGIDs such as gastrointestinal ultrasound to develop more targeted therapy. Future research is underway to determine if targeting objective physiological endpoints results in improved clinical outcomes.

Assessing fecal load with ultrasound in children with colorectal pathology: ReKiSo study

PURPOSE

To evaluate bowel management for children with colorectal pathology by measuring transverse rectal diameter (TRD) and assessing fecal load with transabdominal rectal ultrasound (TRU).

METHODS

Prospective case-control study of children receiving bowel management (BM) between 04/2023 and 04/2024 was done. There was inclusion of patients with Hirschsprung disease (HD), anorectal malformation (ARM) and functional constipation (FC). Patients with other congenital or neurological conditions were excluded. Control group consisted of inpatients and outpatients without abdominal complaints. FC was diagnosed according to ROM-IV-criteria. For HD and ARM, we followed a list of symptoms. To assess fecal load, we visualized the TRD using the Klijn (Klijn et al. in J Urol 172:1986-1988, 2004) method. The bladder was moderately full. The fecal load was assessed retrograde from the rectum. Follow-up was at 1/3/6 months. Secondary data were collected from medical records. Sample size calculated a priori and follow-up group with new gathered data.

RESULTS

p value for TRD in all groups significant with p < 0.05 and in grouped follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound is a useful tool for assessing fecal load and helps diagnose constipation and monitor BM. Irrespective of colorectal pathology, a cut-off of 3 cm seems to discriminate between children without constipation/overload symptoms and asymptomatic patients. We present a radiation-free method for monitoring bowel management.

Meta-analysis: Intestinal ultrasound to evaluate colonic contents and constipation

BACKGROUND

Constipation can be diagnosed clinically using the Rome criteria. Ultrasound (US), which lacks the radiation exposure of conventional X-ray, holds promise as a non-invasive tool to evaluate colonic contents and constipation.

AIM

To examine the role of US in the assessment of constipation.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of Embase (OVID, 1984), Medline (Ovid, 1946), Cochrane Central, ClinicalTrials.gov and Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry from database inception to 26 January 2024 according to PRISMA guidelines and prospectively registered with PROSPERO. All studies using US to assess constipation or colonic contents in either adults or children were included. Rectal diameter measurements were pooled in meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scales and Joanna Briggs Institute checklists.

RESULTS

Of 12,232 studies screened, 51 articles (6084 patients; 3422 children) describing US to assess symptoms in patients with constipation were included. Most studies used Rome criteria to diagnose constipation. Rectal diameter was associated with clinical constipation in 29 paediatric studies (3331 patients). Meta-analysis showed the mean rectal diameter of constipated patients was significantly higher than controls (mean difference 12 mm, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 6.48, 17.93, p < 0.0001, n = 16 studies). Other features of constipation on US included posterior acoustic shadowing and echogenicity of luminal contents.

CONCLUSION

US is an appealing imaging modality to assess luminal contents and constipation. Further well-designed studies are required to validate US metrics that accurately identify constipation.

Editorial: Sonographic assessment of colonic content-A new tool for constipation?

This article is linked to Mathias et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18029 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18109

Analyzing fecal loading and retention patterns by abdominal X-rays of hospitalized older adults: A retrospective study

Background

Aging may affect ascending colon (AC) differently from descending colon (DC) and increase the risk of fecal loading (FL) in AC.

Methods

Patients aged ≥65 years admitted to a community hospital were analyzed by abdominal x-ray for fecal loads and stool retention patterns. FL was scored between 0 and 5 (severe) on each segment of colon with a possible total score 20. Mean segment scores ≥3.5 were designated as high scores for both AC and DC. Logistic regression was performed between groups to identify factors associated with FL patterns.

Results

Groups identified were high FL in both AC and DC (N = 21, 17.2%), FL predominantly in AC (N = 38, 31.1%), low FL in both AC and DC (N=60, 49.2%), and FL low in AC and high in DC (N = 3, 2.5%). Among 71 patients with total FL scores ≥13 (indicating significant stool retention), 37 (52.1%) had the FL predominantly in AC. Patients prescribed antibiotic(s) prior to hospitalization had lower odds of FL predominantly in AC (adjusted odds ratio = 0.18, 95% confidence interval = 0.04-0.84) compared to the group of low FL in both AC and DC with the adjustment of confounders.

Conclusion

This study found that 52.1% of those with significant stool retention on x-ray had the FL predominantly in AC. Antibiotic use was associated with lower odds of having FL predominately in AC. This study provided insights of FL distribution in colon and AC could be an area for significant stool burden in older adults with stool retention.

Use of X-ray to Assess Fecal Loading in Patients with Gastrointestinal Symptoms

BACKGROUND/AIMS

There is currently no gold standard for evaluating stool burden in the colon for patients with gastrointestinal symptoms. We aim to examine the relationship between fecal loading on single view abdominal X-ray imaging and gastrointestinal symptoms such as constipation, diarrhea, bloating, and accidental bowel leakage in adult outpatients.

METHODS

This retrospective, cross-sectional study examined patients seen at University of Michigan from 2005 to 2017. Chart review of demographic information, reported gastrointestinal symptoms, past medical history, and abdominal radiographic imaging was performed. Bivariate analysis was performed to assess associations between these characteristics and fecal loading. Factors independently associated with fecal loading were identified using logistic regression. Significance was established at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

In total, 319 patients who had an X-ray were included in the final analysis, with 84.0% demonstrating fecal loading on the initial X-ray and most reporting constipation as a symptom (n = 214, 84.3%, p = 0.0334). In logistic regression, a chief complaint of constipation had higher odds of being associated with fecal loading on X-ray compared to diarrhea (adjusted OR 6.41; CI 1.51-27.24, p = 0.0118). Bloating as a reported symptom was statistically significant with an adjusted OR of 2.56 (CI 1.10-5.96, p = 0.0286).

CONCLUSIONS

Constipation (as a chief complaint) and bloating (as a symptom) were associated with fecal loading on X-ray imaging, while accidental bowel leakage and diarrhea were not.