Risk of needle tract seeding after coaxial ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy for primary and metastatic tumors of the liver: report of a single institution

Association of preablation tumor biopsy and long-term outcomes of colorectal liver oligometastases

OBJECTIVE

To explore the association of preablation liver biopsy and long-term oncological outcomes in colorectal liver oligometastases (CLOM) (lesions, ≤5; diameter, <5cm).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 149 patients who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy before microwave ablation and 259 patients who did not receive preablation biopsy between September 2009 and June 2023 from two tertiary hospitals. Primary outcome, intrahepatic recurrence-free survival (IRFS), and secondary outcomes, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods. Propensity score matching (PSM) and four sensitivity analyses were performed to mitigate confounding. Multivariable analyses and adjusted subgroup analyses were performed to assess the correlation of intrahepatic recurrence with preablation biopsy.

RESULTS

408 patients were analyzed, with 149 patients (mean age, 58 years ± 10, 105 men [70.5 %]) in the biopsy group and 259 patients (mean age, 58 years ±± 11, 186 men [71.8 %]) in the non-biopsy group. There were no statistically significant differences for 5-years IRFS (HR = 1.14 [95 % CI: 0.82-1.58]; P = 0.450), 5-years DFS (HR = 1.23 [95 % CI: 0.93-1.62]; P = 0.147), and 5-years OS (HR = 1.45 [95 % CI 0.97-2.16]; P = 0.071) between groups after PSM (n = 100). The above results were consistent with those before PSM and four sensitivity analyses. For IRFS, multivariable analyses identified that preablation liver biopsy was not an independent risk factor and did not increase the risk of intrahepatic recurrence in any subgroup based on adjusted subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSION

Preablation liver biopsy has no significant adverse effects on intrahepatic recurrence, disease progression, or patient survival in colorectal liver oligometastases, regardless of covariate adjustments. Our study provides evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and management of CLOM; liver biopsy should not be banned without consideration in the era of precision medicine.

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy for focal liver lesions: Adverse events and diagnostic yield in a single-centre analysis

PURPOSE

Ultrasound-guided biopsy of focal liver lesions (FLL) is a well-established procedure with crucial impact on therapeutic decisions. The safety and accuracy depend on needle type, tumour location and comorbidities. Modern oncological concepts often require large tumour specimens which may increase the procedural risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from consecutively scheduled ultrasound-guided FLL biopsies performed in an interdisciplinary ultrasound unit at a university hospital from 2015-2020. We analysed complication rates, diagnostic accuracy, and patient outcome in a one-year period.

RESULTS

Of 426 scheduled interventions, 339 were included: 322 primary biopsies (40% female, median age 65 years, median BMI 25.4 kg/m2) and 17 rebiopsies in cases with undetermined diagnosis. Indications comprised 309 (96%) cases with suspected malignant lesions. Important comorbidities were type 2 diabetes (n = 107, 33%) and cirrhosis (n = 64, 20%). A conclusive histopathological diagnosis was achieved in 270 (84%) cases with a weak association with lesion size (OR 1.12 per cm, 95%CI 0.99-1.27). Greater BMI (OR 0.60 per 10 BMI points, 95%CI 0.34-1.05) showed a trend towards an insufficient diagnosis. Relevant complications occurred in 8 (2.5%) cases (2 major; 1 life-threatening). Multiple passes showed a trend towards adverse events (OR 2.32 for > 1 pass, 95%CI 0.99-5.42). 93 (29%) patients died during a median follow-up of 171 days.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided FLL biopsy is an efficient and safe diagnostic measure. The limitations of the procedure and its associated risks should be considered in patients with advanced malignancies.

Abdominal Wall Needle Tract Seeding: 15 Years After a Hepatocellular Carcinoma Biopsy

Percutaneous liver biopsy, although considered a safe procedure, can lead to tumoral needle tract seeding. We describe a case of a 65-year-old woman with a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who presented with a painless abdominal lump 15 years post-liver biopsy and left hepatectomy. An MRI revealed an abdominal wall mass suggestive of HCC metastasis from needle tract seeding. Surgical removal confirmed a well-differentiated HCC. Distinctive imaging features of HCC in specific clinical settings reduce the need for biopsy, which should be limited to exceptional cases.

Factors associated with increased risk of peritoneal seeding after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and prognosis associated with peritoneal seeding after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for HCC, focusing on viable tumors after previous locoregional treatment, including TACE and RFA.

METHODS

Exactly 290 patients (mean age, 67.9 years ± 9.74; 223 men) with 383 HCCs (mean size, 15.9 mm ± 5.49) who underwent RFA between June 2012 and December 2019 were included in this retrospective study. Among them, 158 had history of previous treatment (mean number, 1.3 ± 1.8) with 109 viable HCCs. Cumulative seeding after RFA was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Independent factors affecting seeding were investigated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 1175 days (range: 28-4116). Seeding incidence was 4.1 (12/290) and 4.7% (17/383) per patient and tumor, respectively. The median time interval between RFA and detection of seeding was 785 days (range: 81-1961). Independent risk factors for seeding included subcapsular tumor location (hazard ratio [HR] 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4, 13.0; p = 0.012) and RFA for viable HCC after previous locoregional treatment (HR 4.5; 95% CI 1.7, 12.3; p = 0.003). Subgroup analysis for viable tumors, revealed no significant difference in cumulative seeding rates between the TACE and RFA groups (p = 0.078). Cumulative overall survival rates differed significantly between patients with and without seeding metastases (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Peritoneal seeding after RFA is a rare, delayed complication. Subcapsular-located and viable HCC after previous locoregional treatment are potential risk factors for seeding. Seeding metastases could affect the prognosis of patients who cannot receive local therapy.

[Alternatives of histological material collection - When and how is histological confirmation by ultrasound (US), computer tomography (CT) or endosonography (EUS) useful?]

Histological classifications of tumorous lesions together with adequate staging are necessary for stage-appropriate and personalized therapies. The indications, technical possibilities, and limitations as well as potential complications of image-guided needle biopsy by ultrasound, computed tomography, and endosonography are described. Which procedure for which organ and which lesion?

Diagnosis and staging of HCV associated fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma with target identification for miR-650, 552-3p, 676-3p, 512-5p and 147b

BACKGROUND: Chronic HCV infection progresses to fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The latter represents the third most common cause for cancer mortality. Currently, there is no reliable non-invasive biomarker for diagnosis of HCV mediated disorders. OBJECTIVE: Profiling expression signature for circulatory miRNAs in the plasma of 167 Egyptian patients (40 healthy, 48 HCV fibrotic, 39 HCV cirrhotic and 40 HCV-HCC cases). METHODS: QRTPCR was used to quantify expression signature for circulatory miRNAs. RESULTS: MiR-676 and miR-650 were powerful in discriminating cirrhotic and late fibrosis from HCC. MiR-650 could distinguish mild (f0-f1) and advanced (f2-f3) fibrosis from HCC cases. MiR-650 and miR-147b could distinguish early fibrosis from healthy controls meanwhile miR-676 and miR-147b could effectively distinguish between mild chronic and (f1-f3) cases from healthy individuals. All studied miRNAs, except miR-512, can differentiate between (f0-f3) cases and healthy controls. Multivariate logistic regression revealed three potential miRNA panels for effective differentiation of HCC, cirrhotic and chronic liver cases. MiR-676-3p and miR-512-5p were significantly correlated in (f1-f3) fibrosis meanwhile miR-676 and miR-512 could differentiate between cirrhosis and (f0-f3) cases. Both miR-650 and miR-512-5p were positively correlated in the cirrhotic group and in (f0-f4) group. Putative targets for investigated miRNAs were also determined. CONCLUSIONS: Investigated miRNAs could assist in staging and diagnosis of HCV associated disorders.

Clinical Efficacy of Liver Tumor Biopsy With Radiofrequency Ablation of the Puncture Route Using a Co-access Needle

BACKGROUND/AIM

Tumor biopsy are needed frequency for accurate diagnosis. However, percutaneous liver tumor biopsy presents a risk of complications such as bleeding and tumor seeding. We investigated the feasibility of liver tumor biopsy, followed by cauterization with expandable radiofrequency ablation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Tumor biopsies using a co-access needle were performed in 102 patients. Expandable radiofrequency ablation was used to ensure cauterization and hemostasis of the puncture route. We evaluated the clinical background and complications.

RESULTS

The average (±standard deviation) tumor diameter was 56.87±39.45 mm. Pathological diagnosis was possible in all cases. In 20 patients, the postoperative pathological diagnosis differed from the preoperative diagnosis. No significant anemia progression was observed in any patients after biopsy, and no peritoneal seeding was observed during a mean follow-up observation period of 18.5 months.

CONCLUSION

Liver tumor biopsy, followed by cauterization with expandable radiofrequency ablation via a co-access needle, is safe and useful for obtaining reliable diagnoses.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: metastatic pathways and extra-hepatic findings

Although a small portion of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have radiologically evident extrahepatic disease at the initial presentation, a larger number of them develop metastatic disease later during the course of treatment or after definitive treatment. Furthermore, early metastatic disease could be overlooked by imaging due to small size and non-specificity of findings. Extrahepatic spread of HCC occurs via different pathways and is directly fueled by tumor biology and its molecular characteristics. Early and accurate detection of extrahepatic disease in patients with HCC has significant impact on management and selection of treatment options. Additionally, precise staging of disease will allow for better prediction of survival and outcome. Different pathways of regional and systemic spread of HCC with their proposed mechanisms and relevant underlying molecular derangement will be discussed in this article. Potential roles in management of patients with HCC will be discussed and reviewed in this article.

Relative Sensitivity of Core-Needle Biopsy and Incisional Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Musculoskeletal Sarcomas

BACKGROUND

There is no evidence as to the diagnostic value of the two most frequently used methods of biopsies in sarcomas: Incisional or core needle biopsy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity of the incisional and the core needle biopsy techniques in the diagnosis of bone and soft tissue sarcomas.

METHODS

We included 417 patients with a definitive diagnosis of bone or soft tissue sarcoma in whom a total of 472 biopsies had been performed. We correlated the results of the biopsies with the result of the definitive histopathological examination of the resected tumor. Dignity, entity, and grading (whenever possible) of the tissue samples were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 258 biopsies (55%) were performed in order to diagnose a soft tissue tumor and 351 biopsies (74.4%) were core needle biopsies. The number of repeat core needle biopsies, necessitated because of inconclusive histopathological results, was significantly higher (50 vs. 5; p = 0.003). We observed no significant difference regarding dignity, entity, and grading between the 2 different types of biopsies. Only with regards to the determination of dignity and entity of chondroid tumors, incisional biopsy was superior with statistical significance (p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the largest study on biopsies for bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Based only on our results, we are unable to favor one method of biopsy and found high accuracy with both methods. Considering the potential complications, the added oncological risks of incisional biopsies and the ready availability of core needle biopsies, the latter, in our assessment, represents a valid and favourable method for bone and soft tissue sarcomas.

Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous coaxial core biopsy of pancreatic lesions: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic cancer tumors are difficult to access for biopsy. The use of coaxial needles during ultrasound (US)-guided coarse needle biopsy (CNB) may help to improve specimen collection yields and avoid tissue damage. In this retrospective study, the safety, efficacy, and clinical benefits of US-guided percutaneous coaxial CNB of pancreatic masses were evaluated and compared to those of non-coaxial CNB.

METHODS

A total sample of 220 biopsies performed from August 2015 to August 2019 were analyzed, including 114 performed with a coaxial needle (17-gauge coaxial coarse needle combined with an 18-gauge coarse biopsy needle) and 106 performed with a non-coaxial needle (18-gauge coarse biopsy needle without a coaxial sheath). The coaxial CNB group was stratified by lesion location to further evaluate the applicability of coaxial core needles. The satisfactory specimen rate, diagnostic efficiency, operating time, and complication rate were compared statistically between groups and subgroups.

RESULTS

Compared to the non-coaxial CNB group, the coaxial CNB group had a greater satisfactory specimen rate (98.3% vs. 92.3%; p = 0.048), a lesser mean operating time (8.9 ± 3.27 min vs. 16.8 ± 5.77 min; p < 0.001), and a lower complication rate (2.6% vs. 9.6%, p =0 .04). A better diagnostic efficiency was obtained for coaxial CNBs in the head of pancreas (98.7%) than in the body or tail of the pancreas (90%, p = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

For pancreatic masses, coaxial CNB can yield a higher satisfactory sample rate, lower complication rate, and shorter operating time than non-coaxial biopsy. US-guided percutaneous coaxial CNB is a safe and efficient puncture technique for pancreatic lesion diagnosis.

Development and validation of a clinicopathological-based nomogram to predict seeding risk after percutaneous thermal ablation of primary liver carcinoma

Objectives

To develop a clinicopathological‐based nomogram to improve the prediction of the seeding risk of after percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) in primary liver carcinoma (PLC).

Methods

A total of 2030 patients with PLC who underwent PTA were included between April 2009 and December 2018. The patients were grouped into a training dataset (n = 1024) and an external validation dataset (n = 1006). Baseline characteristics were collected to identify the risk factors of seeding after PTA. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model based on the risk factors was used to develop the nomogram, which was used for assessment for its predictive accuracy using mainly the Harrell's C‐index and receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results

The median follow‐up time was 30.3 months (range, 3.2‐115.7 months). The seeding risk was 0.89% per tumor and 1.5% per patient in the training set. The nomogram was developed based on tumor size, subcapsular, α‐fetoprotein (AFP), and international normalized ratio (INR). The 1‐, 2‐, and 3‐year cumulative seeding rates were 0.1%, 0.7% and 1.2% in the low‐risk group, and 1.7%, 6.3% and 6.3% in the high‐risk group, respectively, showing significant statistical difference (P < .001). The nomogram had good calibration and discriminatory abilities in the training set, with C‐indexes of 0.722 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.661, 0.883) and AUC of 0.850 (95% CI: 0.767, 0.934). External validation with 1000 bootstrapped sample sets showed a good C‐index of 0.706 (95% CI: 0.546, 0.866) and AUC of 0.736 (95% CI: 0. 646, 0.827).

Conclusions

The clinicopathological‐based nomogram could be used to quantify the probability of seeding risk after PTA in PLC.

Core needle biopsy versus incisional biopsy for differentiation of soft-tissue sarcomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Controversies exist regarding the biopsy technique of choice for the accurate diagnosis of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of core needle biopsy (CNB) versus incisional biopsy (IB) in STS with reference to the final histopathological result.

METHODS

Studies regarding the diagnostic accuracy of CNB and IB in detecting STS were searched systematically in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Estimates of sensitivity and specificity with associated 95% CIs for diagnostic accuracy were calculated. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies version 2 (QUADAS-2).

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies comprising 2680 patients who underwent 1582 CNBs and 241 IBs with subsequent tumor resection met the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of CNB and IB to detect the dignity of lesions were 97% (95% CI, 95%-98%) and 99% (95% CI, 97%-99%), respectively, and 96% (95% CI, 92%-99%) and 100% (95% CI, 94%-100%), respectively. Estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of CNB and IB to detect the STS histotype were 88% (95% CI, 86%-90%) and 77% (95% CI, 72%-81%), respectively, and 93% (95% CI, 87%-97%) and 65% (95% CI, 49%-78%), respectively. Patients who underwent CNB had a significantly reduced risk of complications compared with patients who underwent IB (risk ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.56 [P ≤ .01). Quality assessment of studies revealed a high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

CNB has high accuracy in diagnosing the dignity of lesions and STS histotype in patients with suspected STS with fewer complications compared with IB. Therefore, CNB should be regarded as the primary biopsy technique.