1
|
Lai W, Wang G, Zhao Z. Advancements in Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Evaluation of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Comprehensive Review. Acad Radiol 2025:S1076-6332(25)00218-1. [PMID: 40246673 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2024] [Revised: 03/07/2025] [Accepted: 03/12/2025] [Indexed: 04/19/2025]
Abstract
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a major health issue for women, making accurate diagnosis and assessment essential for effective clinical management. Among the various imaging techniques used for POP evaluation, translabial ultrasound and fluoroscopy have been widely utilized. Translabial ultrasound is a non-invasive, cost-effective method that provides real-time dynamic imaging of the pelvic floor during activities such as straining. Fluoroscopy, often employed in defecography, offers real-time visualization of pelvic organ movement but is limited by radiation exposure. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with its superior soft tissue contrast and non-invasive nature, has emerged as a valuable tool for providing detailed anatomical and functional insights into POP This review outlines the advancements in using MRI to assess POP. It highlights the technical advantages, clinical applications, comparisons with other imaging methods, and future research directions. By analyzing recent research, we aim to clarify the role of MRI in evaluating POP and encourage its integration into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiwei Lai
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China (W.L., G.W., Z.Z.)
| | - Guanghong Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China (W.L., G.W., Z.Z.)
| | - Zeyun Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China (W.L., G.W., Z.Z.).
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ralston C, Reena M, Solanki D, Morris S, Schizas AMP, Williams AB, Hainsworth AJ. Can we use integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound as a screening tool in defaecatory pelvic floor dysfunction? A prospective evaluation of the accuracy of integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound compared with defaecation proctography. Colorectal Dis 2025; 27:e17274. [PMID: 39948825 DOI: 10.1111/codi.17274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 09/26/2024] [Accepted: 10/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2025]
Abstract
AIM Pelvic floor dysfunction is common and includes symptoms such as urinary incontinence, pelvic pain, faecal incontinence, obstructive defaecation syndrome symptoms and pelvic organ prolapse. It is investigated with defaecation proctography (DP) and integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound (TPFUS). Whilst DP is currently the gold standard, TPFUS is efficient and less invasive, offering additional sphincter function assessment. This study aimed to compare TPFUS accuracy to DP in the evaluation of pelvic floor dysfunction. METHODS From 2015 to 2016, a prospective observational study was conducted at Guy's and St Thomas's Foundation Trust. Symptomatic women with incomplete evacuation were consecutively invited to participate. Patients underwent three scans using both TPFUS and DP. Reports were independently verified by a blinded consultant. Sensitivity, specificity and agreement were calculated for anatomical (rectocele, intussusception, enterocele, cystocele) and functional (coordination, evacuation) features. RESULTS A total of 216 patients were included. Moderate agreement was seen between DP and TPFUS in prediction of rectoceles (positive predictive value 85%, negative predictive value 67%, Cohen's kappa 0.46) and on the evaluation of dimensions of rectoceles (R coefficient 0.55) (P < 0.0001). Fair agreement was seen in the assessment of propulsion (positive predictive value 76%, negative predictive value 50%, Cohen's kappa 0.25). Poor agreement was observed on other anatomical and functional objectives. CONCLUSION This is the most extensive prospective comparison of these imaging modalities. While there is limited correlation between DP and TPFUS in exploring anatomical and functional aspects of pelvic floor disorders, TPFUS proves to be an effective screening tool. With enhanced expertise and confidence in its use, TPFUS could potentially guide surgical planning rather than solely identifying those needing DP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Max Reena
- Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Deepa Solanki
- Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jang S, Kim B, K Venkatesh S, T Flicek K. MR imaging of benign vulvar lesions: a pictorial essay. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2025; 50:979-994. [PMID: 39180666 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04524-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2024] [Revised: 08/06/2024] [Accepted: 08/10/2024] [Indexed: 08/26/2024]
Abstract
Benign vulvar lesions can be difficult to differentiate with few publications on their imaging appearances. While many vulvar lesions may be clinically diagnosed and treated, more are being detected incidentally with the increasing prevalence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis. In addition, clinicians may find imaging of benign vulvar lesions helpful for greater anatomical correlation. After reviewing the important MRI sequences for vulvar imaging and the anatomy of the vulva on MRI, this pictorial essay illustrates variety of cystic and solid benign vulvar lesions to familiarize radiologists with their common MRI appearances. Other miscellaneous pelvic lesions that can affect the vulva are also described.
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang JM, Huang WC. Ultrasound in Female Urinary Incontinence. J Med Ultrasound 2024; 32:14-20. [PMID: 38665347 PMCID: PMC11040483 DOI: 10.4103/jmu.jmu_25_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common health condition that may interfere with the quality of life. A comprehensive evaluation of female UI helps with effective and safe treatments. Ultrasound has gained popularity to explore UI recently because it can collect crucial information for treatment planning and counseling. Translabial and introital approaches are commonly and reliably applied to ultrasound. The images can be obtained using two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasounds. Ultrasound is the only modality capable of confirming the presence or absence of a mid-urethral sling (MUS) and is able to demonstrate bulking agents as well. Although some of the ultrasound findings may only be incidental or supplementary to the patient's symptoms, ultrasound benefits for investigating the pathophysiology of UI and surgical outcomes of MUS procedures. It is anticipated that standardization in terminology, measurement techniques, and reporting can be established in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenn-Ming Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Chen Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pausch AM, Betschart C, Hötker AM. [Radiological imaging following pelvic prolapse surgery]. RADIOLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023; 63:808-813. [PMID: 37698652 PMCID: PMC10600287 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-023-01203-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE Pelvic organ prolapse is a common condition in women, for which both conservative and surgical interventions are available. Knowledge of the different surgical procedures and the materials used is essential for adequate radiological diagnosis after prolapse surgery in order to differentiate potential complications from normal postoperative changes. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS In the immediate postoperative period, computed tomography (CT) is often the modality of choice for evaluating acute complications such as bleeding or organ injuries. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides excellent soft tissue contrast and is therefore generally preferred for assessing subacute and chronic complications. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS Innovative techniques such as dynamic MRI protocols can improve the radiological assessment after prolapse surgery by enabling the evaluation of organ mobility. PERFORMANCE Radiological standard procedures such as computed tomography (CT) and MRI provide detailed and reliable information about the postoperative site and potential complications following prolapse surgery. ACHIEVEMENTS Radiological imaging plays an important role in the evaluation of patients after prolapse surgery, particularly when complications are suspected. Accurate radiological diagnosis can guide further appropriate therapeutic measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia M Pausch
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Rämistr. 100, 8091, Zürich, Schweiz
| | | | - Andreas M Hötker
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Rämistr. 100, 8091, Zürich, Schweiz.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vijay K, Kelley L, Pak T, Kuhlmann P, Patterson-Lachowicz A, Fetzer DT, Reynolds L, Carmel M, Zimmern P, Khatri G. Multimodality Imaging of Anterior Compartment Pelvic Floor Repair. Radiographics 2023; 43:e230032. [PMID: 37498784 DOI: 10.1148/rg.230032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) are two common disorders that affect the anterior compartment of the pelvic floor in women. These can be treated conservatively or surgically. Among patients treated surgically, a substantial number present with pain, recurrent POP or SUI, or other conditions that warrant additional interventions. In many of these cases, imaging is key to identifying and characterizing the type of procedure performed, locating synthetic materials that may have been placed, and characterizing complications. Imaging may be particularly helpful when prior surgical records are not available or a comprehensive physical examination is not possible. US and MRI are the most commonly used modalities for such patients, although radiopaque surgical materials may be visible at voiding cystourethrography and CT. The authors summarize commonly used surgical treatment options for patients with SUI and POP, review imaging techniques for evaluation of such patients, and describe the normal imaging appearance and complications of pelvic floor surgical repair procedures in the anterior compartment of the pelvis. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanupriya Vijay
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.V., L.K., T.P., A.P.L., D.T.F., L.R., G.K.) and Urology (P.K., M.C., P.Z.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75234
| | - Layne Kelley
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.V., L.K., T.P., A.P.L., D.T.F., L.R., G.K.) and Urology (P.K., M.C., P.Z.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75234
| | - Taemee Pak
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.V., L.K., T.P., A.P.L., D.T.F., L.R., G.K.) and Urology (P.K., M.C., P.Z.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75234
| | - Paige Kuhlmann
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.V., L.K., T.P., A.P.L., D.T.F., L.R., G.K.) and Urology (P.K., M.C., P.Z.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75234
| | - Amber Patterson-Lachowicz
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.V., L.K., T.P., A.P.L., D.T.F., L.R., G.K.) and Urology (P.K., M.C., P.Z.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75234
| | - David T Fetzer
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.V., L.K., T.P., A.P.L., D.T.F., L.R., G.K.) and Urology (P.K., M.C., P.Z.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75234
| | - Laura Reynolds
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.V., L.K., T.P., A.P.L., D.T.F., L.R., G.K.) and Urology (P.K., M.C., P.Z.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75234
| | - Maude Carmel
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.V., L.K., T.P., A.P.L., D.T.F., L.R., G.K.) and Urology (P.K., M.C., P.Z.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75234
| | - Philippe Zimmern
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.V., L.K., T.P., A.P.L., D.T.F., L.R., G.K.) and Urology (P.K., M.C., P.Z.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75234
| | - Gaurav Khatri
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.V., L.K., T.P., A.P.L., D.T.F., L.R., G.K.) and Urology (P.K., M.C., P.Z.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75234
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen JY, Zimmern PE. Vaginoscopy With Laser Treatment of Symptomatic Upper Vaginal Mesh Exposure After Prior Mesh Sacrocolpopexy. Urology 2023; 176:69-73. [PMID: 36906181 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the technique of vaginoscopy with Holmium:YAG and Thulium laser treatment of upper vaginal mesh exposure after mesh sacrocolpopexy (MSC) as well as evaluate treatment efficacy. METHODS Following IRB approval, a chart review of all patients who underwent laser treatment of upper vaginal mesh exposure during vaginoscopy at a single institution between 2013 and 2022 was performed. Demographic information, previous mesh placement history, presenting symptoms, physical examination and vaginoscopy findings, imaging, laser type and settings, operating time, complications, and follow-up including examination and office vaginoscopy findings were extracted from electronic medical records. RESULTS Five patients and 6 surgical encounters were identified. All patients had a history of MSC and symptomatic mesh exposure at the vaginal apex, which was tented up and difficult to access by traditional transvaginal mesh excision. Five patients underwent vaginal mesh treatment with laser with no further vaginal mesh exposure on follow-up exam or vaginoscopy. One patient was found to have a small recurrence at 4 months and underwent a second treatment with negative findings on vaginoscopy 7.9 months post-operatively. There were no complications. CONCLUSION Vaginoscopy using a rigid cystoscope and laser treatment of upper vaginal mesh exposure using a Holmium:YAG or Thulium laser is a safe and quick method which led to definitive symptom resolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessie Y Chen
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Philippe E Zimmern
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Haouari MA, Boulay-Coletta I, Khatri G, Touloupas C, Anglaret S, Tardivel AM, Beranger-Gibert S, Silvera S, Loriau J, Zins M. Complications of Mesh Sacrocolpopexy and Rectopexy: Imaging Review. Radiographics 2023; 43:e220137. [PMID: 36701247 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy are commonly used surgical options for treatment of patients with pelvic organ and rectal prolapse, respectively. These procedures involve surgical fixation of the vaginal vault or the rectum to the sacral promontory with mesh material and can be performed independently of each other or in a combined fashion and by using an open abdominal approach or laparoscopy with or without robotic assistance. Radiologists can be particularly helpful in cases where patients' surgical histories are unclear by identifying normal sacrocolpopexy or rectopexy mesh material and any associated complications. Acute complications such as bleeding or urinary tract injury or stricture are generally evaluated with CT. More chronic complications such as mesh extrusion or exposure with or without fistulization to surrounding structures are generally evaluated with MRI. Other complications can have a variable time of onset after surgery. Patients with suspected bowel obstruction are generally evaluated with CT. Those with suspected infection, abscess formation, and discitis or osteomyelitis may be evaluated with MRI, although CT evaluation may be appropriate in certain scenarios. The authors review the sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy surgical techniques, discuss appropriate imaging protocols for evaluation of patients with suspected complications, and illustrate the normal appearance and common complications of these procedures. © RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Amine Haouari
- From the Departments of Radiology (M.A.H., I.B.C., C.T., S.A., A.M.T., S.B.G., S.S., M.Z.) and Digestive Surgery (J.L.), Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 185 Rue Raymond Losserand, 74014 Paris, France; and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.K.)
| | - Isabelle Boulay-Coletta
- From the Departments of Radiology (M.A.H., I.B.C., C.T., S.A., A.M.T., S.B.G., S.S., M.Z.) and Digestive Surgery (J.L.), Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 185 Rue Raymond Losserand, 74014 Paris, France; and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.K.)
| | - Gaurav Khatri
- From the Departments of Radiology (M.A.H., I.B.C., C.T., S.A., A.M.T., S.B.G., S.S., M.Z.) and Digestive Surgery (J.L.), Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 185 Rue Raymond Losserand, 74014 Paris, France; and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.K.)
| | - Caroline Touloupas
- From the Departments of Radiology (M.A.H., I.B.C., C.T., S.A., A.M.T., S.B.G., S.S., M.Z.) and Digestive Surgery (J.L.), Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 185 Rue Raymond Losserand, 74014 Paris, France; and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.K.)
| | - Sophie Anglaret
- From the Departments of Radiology (M.A.H., I.B.C., C.T., S.A., A.M.T., S.B.G., S.S., M.Z.) and Digestive Surgery (J.L.), Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 185 Rue Raymond Losserand, 74014 Paris, France; and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.K.)
| | - Anne-Marie Tardivel
- From the Departments of Radiology (M.A.H., I.B.C., C.T., S.A., A.M.T., S.B.G., S.S., M.Z.) and Digestive Surgery (J.L.), Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 185 Rue Raymond Losserand, 74014 Paris, France; and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.K.)
| | - Sophie Beranger-Gibert
- From the Departments of Radiology (M.A.H., I.B.C., C.T., S.A., A.M.T., S.B.G., S.S., M.Z.) and Digestive Surgery (J.L.), Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 185 Rue Raymond Losserand, 74014 Paris, France; and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.K.)
| | - Stephane Silvera
- From the Departments of Radiology (M.A.H., I.B.C., C.T., S.A., A.M.T., S.B.G., S.S., M.Z.) and Digestive Surgery (J.L.), Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 185 Rue Raymond Losserand, 74014 Paris, France; and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.K.)
| | - Jerome Loriau
- From the Departments of Radiology (M.A.H., I.B.C., C.T., S.A., A.M.T., S.B.G., S.S., M.Z.) and Digestive Surgery (J.L.), Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 185 Rue Raymond Losserand, 74014 Paris, France; and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.K.)
| | - Marc Zins
- From the Departments of Radiology (M.A.H., I.B.C., C.T., S.A., A.M.T., S.B.G., S.S., M.Z.) and Digestive Surgery (J.L.), Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 185 Rue Raymond Losserand, 74014 Paris, France; and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhou Q, Lu M, Li GS, Peng GL, Song YF. Knowledge mapping and visualization analysis of pelvic organ prolapse repair with mesh from 2001 to 2021. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023; 11:1104724. [PMID: 37091336 PMCID: PMC10113510 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1104724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims: In recent decades, extensive attention has been paid to the application of mesh to repair pelvic floor defects. However, a large body of related literature has not been system summarized. The purpose of this study is to summarize and visualize the literature on pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair with mesh using bibliometrics. Methods: Medical literature regarding POP repair with mesh were searched and obtained in the Web of Science™ Core (WoSCC) database from 2001 to 2021. Microsoft Excel 2020, CiteSpace and VOSviewer were used to conduct the bibliometric and knowledge-map analysis. Results: In the past 20 years, a total of 2,550 articles and reviews have been published in 35 journals, and the published and cited results show a growing trend. Cosson M and International Urogynecology Journal were the authors and journals with the highest output, respectively. The United States, France and the United Kingdom are among the top three countries/organizations in relevant publications in worldwide. 584 key words in the literature are divided into 8 clusters, which are mainly related to prolapse type, risk factors, surgical methods, imaging, quality of life and bioengineering. Using clinical research and tissue engineering technology to reduce mesh complications is the current hot spot in this field. Conclusion: Reasonable application of mesh and avoiding mesh complications are still the most concerned topics in POP research. Although clinical research, surgical improvement, biological mesh and bioengineering technology have shown promising results, it is still urgent to carry out clinical transformation application research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quan Zhou
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The People’s Hospital of China Three Gorges University/The First People’s Hospital of Yichang, Yichang, China
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The 900th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- *Correspondence: Quan Zhou, ; Yan-Feng Song,
| | - Man Lu
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The People’s Hospital of China Three Gorges University/The First People’s Hospital of Yichang, Yichang, China
| | - Guo-Sheng Li
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The People’s Hospital of China Three Gorges University/The First People’s Hospital of Yichang, Yichang, China
| | - Gan-Lu Peng
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The People’s Hospital of China Three Gorges University/The First People’s Hospital of Yichang, Yichang, China
| | - Yan-Feng Song
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The 900th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Maetzold E, Takacs EB. Urethral Pathology in Women. Curr Urol Rep 2022; 23:225-234. [DOI: 10.1007/s11934-022-01109-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
11
|
Clinical applications of pelvic floor imaging: opinion statement endorsed by the society of abdominal radiology (SAR), American Urological Association (AUA), and American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:1451-1464. [PMID: 33772614 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03017-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 02/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Pelvic floor dysfunction is prevalent, with multifactorial causes and variable clinical presentations. Accurate diagnosis and assessment of the involved structures commonly requires a multidisciplinary approach. Imaging is often complementary to clinical assessment, and the most commonly used modalities for pelvic floor imaging include fluoroscopic defecography, magnetic resonance defecography, and pelvic floor ultrasound. This collaboration opinion paper was developed by representatives from multiple specialties involved in care of patients with pelvic floor dysfunction (radiologists, urogynecologists, urologists, and colorectal surgeons). Here, we discuss the utility of imaging techniques in various clinical scenarios, highlighting the perspectives of referring physicians. The final draft was endorsed by the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR), American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS), and the American Urological Association (AUA).
Collapse
|
12
|
Bahrami S, Khatri G, Sheridan AD, Palmer SL, Lockhart ME, Arif-Tiwari H, Glanc P. Pelvic floor ultrasound: when, why, and how? Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:1395-1413. [PMID: 31529202 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02216-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Pelvic floor disorders are a significant medical issue, reportedly affecting nearly one in four women in the United States. Nonetheless, until the last decade, there has been relatively limited imaging research into this highly prevalent disorder. The three major imaging modalities utilized to assess pelvic floor function are ultrasound, MRI and fluoroscopy. Pelvic floor ultrasound is a rapidly emerging technique which takes advantage of the widespread availability of ultrasound, the non-invasive and relatively inexpensive approach and the incorporation of real-time imaging and software advances which permit 3-D volume imaging. Pelvic floor ultrasound provides the opportunity to optimize patient counseling and enhance pre-operative planning by providing an anatomic and functional roadmap for the referring clinician. We recommend the consideration of pelvic floor ultrasound, as described here, as an addition to the imaging armamentarium available to physicians and surgeons serving this patient population.
Collapse
|
13
|
Huang WC, Yang JM, Chen HF. Five-year clinical and imaging outcomes of primary transobturator midurethral sling procedures for uncomplicated urodynamic stress incontinence. Maturitas 2020; 138:42-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|