Prospective assessment of diagnostic efficacy and safety of SonazoidTM and SonoVue® ultrasound contrast agents in patients with focal liver lesions

PEGylated gas vesicles: a promising novel ultrasound contrast agent for diagnosis and guiding radiofrequency ablation of liver tumor

Ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) play an important role in diagnosis and the imaging-guided treatment of liver tumor in clinical settings. However, most commercially available UCAs are micro-sized and fabricated through a chemical synthesis route. Here, we developed a new class of biosynthesized nanoscale contrast agent (PEG-GVs) and comprehensively compared its physicochemical characteristics and imaging performance with commercial Sonovue and Sonazoid. Our results revealed PEG-GVs may produce more stable and durable contrast signals, contributing to their penetration beyond blood vessels and long-time retention in liver. Interestingly, we found that PEG-GVs did not exhibit a continuously enhanced accumulation in the liver tumor due to the EPR effect, but displayed a rapid regression. The long-time retention of PEG-GVs in normal liver tissue and rapid regression from liver tumor lead to distinct display of liver tumor boundaries, enabling the early diagnosis of small liver metastases and presenting advantages in guiding radiofrequency ablation of liver tumor. Moreover, we have also verified that PEG-GVs exhibit excellent imaging performance and biosafety in macaques. Our study provides new insights into the roles of PEG-GVs in liver tumor diagnosis and ablation guidance.

LI-RADS for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma by contrast-enhanced US with SonoVue and Sonazoid-a single center prospective study

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of two algorithms for HCC diagnosis: SonoVue-CEUS based on CEUS LI-RADS version 2017 and a modified algorithm incorporating Kupffer-phase findings for Sonazoid-CEUS.

METHODS

This single center prospective study enrolled high-risk patients for HCC. Each participant underwent SonoVue-CEUS and Sonazoid-CEUS. Each liver observation was assigned two LI-RADS categories according to each algorithm: SonoVue-CEUS LI-RADS and modified Sonazoid-CEUS LI-RADS. For the latter method, observations at least 10 mm with non-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement were upgraded LR-4 to LR-5 if there was no washout with a Kupffer defect and were reassigned LR-M to LR-5 if there was early washout with mild Kupffer defect. The reference standard was pathologic confirmation.

RESULTS

Overall, 66 patients (mean age, 61.2 years ± 10.9; 54 male patients, 12 female patients) with 66 observations (mean size, 31 mm ± 16) were eventually enrolled. The results of Sonazoid-CEUS LI-RADS showed significant changes in sensitivity (82% vs. 65%, p < 0.001), accuracy (85% vs. 71%, p < 0.001) compared with the SonoVue-CEUS LI-RADS. There was no significant difference in specificity (93% vs. 87%, p = 0.26).

CONCLUSION

When incorporating Kupffer-phase findings, Sonazoid-CEUS LI-RADS had higher sensitivity without loss of specificity compared with SonoVue-CEUS LI-RADS.

Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound With Sonazoid for Assessment of Focal Liver Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This meta-analysis examined the diagnostic accuracy of Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography (SZ-CEUS) in discriminating malignant from benign focal liver lesions (FLLs) and HCC from non-HCC FLLs. Finding relevant studies required a rigorous PubMed, EMBASE, and other database search. To distinguish malignant from benign FLLs, SZ-CEUS had a pooled sensitivity of 94% (95% CI: 0.91-0.95) and specificity of 84% (95%: 0.78-0.89). HCC distinction had 83% sensitivity and 96% specificity (95% CI: 0.80-0.85 and 0.95-0.97). SZ-CEUS accurately distinguishes malignant from benign FLLs and HCC from non-HCC lesions, especially smaller HCC lesions.

Comparative Safety of Ultrasound Enhancing Agents: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Ultrasound enhancing agents (UEAs), including OPTISON, DEFINITY, and LUMASON, enhance the diagnostic performance of echocardiography, particularly, in patients with suboptimal acoustic windows. However, there remains a paucity of comparative safety assessments among the Food and Drug Administration-approved UEAs. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-guided systematic literature review performed in August 2023 searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and gray literature. Randomized and nonrandomized comparative evidence on safety of contrast-enhanced procedures were included. A feasibility assessment ensured homogeneity across studies by comparing patient characteristics and outcomes. Bayesian hierarchical network meta-regression was used to indirectly compare published safety outcomes across different UEAs. In addition, adverse events (AEs) between 2019 and 2023 for each UEA were retrieved from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS), and comparative safety outcomes were derived using annual UEA administration in the United States. The screening of 4,146 records rendered 19 studies for inclusion in the indirect comparison analysis after feasibility assessment. OPTISON demonstrated favorable safety in direct comparisons with DEFINITY and LUMASON across the majority of investigated AEs. Network meta-regression results on serious AEs within 30 minutes revealed odds ratios (ORs) of 0.59 (95% confidence interval 0.27 to 1.23) and 0.63 (0.29 to 1.33) for OPTISON versus LUMASON and DEFINITY, respectively, indicating a decreased risk of serious AEs for OPTISON versus LUMASON and DEFINITY, further supported by statistically significant ORs within FAERS: 0.01 (0 to 0.02), p <0.001 and 0.15 (0.05 to 0.48), p = 0.001 for OPTISON versus LUMASON and DEFINITY, respectively. In conclusion, our results restate the favorable comparative safety profile of OPTISON, providing new evidence to inform clinical decision-making.

A non-invasive predictive model based on multimodality ultrasonography images to differentiate malignant from benign focal liver lesions

We have developed a non-invasive predictive nomogram model that combines image features from Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (SCEUS) and Sound touch elastography (STE) with clinical features for accurate differentiation of malignant from benign focal liver lesions (FLLs). This study ultimately encompassed 262 patients with FLLs from the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, covering the period from March 2020 to April 2023, and divided them into training set (n = 183) and test set (n = 79). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent indicators and develop a predictive model based on image features from SCEUS, STE, and clinical features. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve was determined to estimate the diagnostic performance of the nomogram with CEUS LI-RADS, and STE values. The C-index, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were further used for validation. Multivariate and LASSO logistic regression analyses identified that age, ALT, arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), enhancement level in the Kupffer phase, and Emean by STE were valuable predictors to distinguish malignant from benign lesions. The nomogram achieved AUCs of 0.988 and 0.978 in the training and test sets, respectively, outperforming the CEUS LI-RADS (0.754 and 0.824) and STE (0.909 and 0.923) alone. The C-index and calibration curve demonstrated that the nomogram offers high diagnostic accuracy with predicted values consistent with actual values. DCA indicated that the nomogram could increase the net benefit for patients. The predictive nomogram innovatively combining SCEUS, STE, and clinical features can effectively improve the diagnostic performance for focal liver lesions, which may help with individualized diagnosis and treatment in clinical practice.

Contrast-Enhanced Intraoperative Ultrasound Shows Excellent Performance in Improving Intraoperative Decision-Making

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance and the impact of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) on intraoperative decision-making, as there is still no standardized protocol for its use. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed multiple CE-IOUS performed in hepato-pancreatic-biliary surgery with respect to pre- and postoperative imaging and histopathological findings.

METHODS

Data of 50 patients who underwent hepato-pancreatic-biliary surgery between 03/2022 and 03/2024 were retrospectively collected. CE-IOUS was performed with a linear 6-9 MHz multifrequency probe connected to a high-resolution device. The ultrasound contrast agent used was a stabilized aqueous suspension of sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles.

RESULTS

In total, all 50 lesions indicated for surgery were correctly identified. In 30 cases, CE-IOUS was used to localize the primary lesion and to define the resection margins. In the remaining 20 cases, CE-IOUS identified an additional lesion. Fifteen of these findings were identified as malignant. In eight of these cases, the additional malignant lesion was subsequently resected. In the remaining seven cases, CE-IOUS again revealed an inoperable situation. In summary, CE-IOUS diagnostics resulted in a high correct classification rate of 95.7%, with positive and negative predictive values of 95.2% and 100.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CE-IOUS shows excellent performance in describing intraoperative findings in hepato-pancreatic-biliary surgery, leading to a substantial impact on intraoperative decision-making.

CEUS compared with CECT, MRI, and FDG-PET/CT for diagnosing CRC liver metastases: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and Fluorine-18-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for diagnosing suspected liver metastases in patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

The meta-analysis using the bivariate model included studies on patients with newly diagnosed CRC only and excluded patients with non-CRC liver metastases, known liver metastases, patients treated with chemotherapy and local treatments, e.g. hepatic resection or radiofrequency ablation. We used QUADAS-2 to assess the methodological quality of the studies.

RESULTS

We included 32 studies, 6 studies evaluated the accuracy of CEUS (n = 937 participants), 26 studies evaluated CECT (n = 2,582), 8 studies evaluated MRI (n = 564) and 6 studies evaluated FDG-PET/CT (n = 813). Sensitivity: FDG-PET/CT 94.4% [95% CI: 90.7-98.1%], MRI 92.9% [95% CI: 88.8-97.0%], CEUS 86.1% [95% CI: 78.0-94.3%] and CECT 84.6% [95% CI: 79.3-89.9%]. Specificity FDG-PET/CT 97.9% [95% CI: 95.9-99.9%], CEUS 96.1% [95% CI: 93.6-98.6%], MRI 94.4% [95% CI: 90.5-98.3%], and CECT 94.3% [95% CI: 91.8-96.8%].

CONCLUSION

FDG-PET/CT had significantly higher sensitivity and specificity than CECT, and significantly higher sensitivity than CEUS. MRI had a significantly higher sensitivity than CEUS, but a lower non-significant specificity. CECT had the lowest sensitivity and specificity.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION DETAILS

CRD42017055015 and CRD42017082996.

Value of Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography in characterizing indeterminate focal liver lesions on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI in patients without risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the added value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) using Sonazoid in characterizing focal liver lesions (FLLs) with indeterminate findings on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI in patients without risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Patients who underwent CEUS using Sonazoid for characterizing indeterminate FLLs on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI were. The indeterminate FLLs were classified according to the degree of malignancy on a 5-point scale on MRI and combined MRI and CEUS. The final diagnosis was made either pathologically or based on more than one-year follow-up. The diagnostic performance was assessed using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and the net reclassification improvement (NRI) was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 97 patients (mean age, 49 years ± 16, 41 men, 80 benign and 17 malignant lesions) were included. When CEUS was added to MRI, the area under the ROC curve increased, but the difference was not statistically significant (0.87 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.77-0.98] for MRI vs 0.93 [95% CI, 0.87-0.99] for CEUS added to MRI, P = 0.296). The overall NRI was 0.473 (95% CI, 0.100-0.845; P = 0.013): 33.8% (27/80) of benign lesions and 41.2% (7/17) of malignant lesions were appropriately reclassified, whereas 10.0% (8/80) of benign lesions and 17.6% (3/17) of malignant lesions were incorrectly reclassified.

CONCLUSIONS

Although performing CEUS with Sonazoid did not significantly improve the overall diagnostic performance in characterizing indeterminate FLLs on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI in patients without risk factors for HCC, it may increase radiologist's confidence in classifying FLLs.

Intra-individual comparison of Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound and SonoVue contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To assess whether the diagnostic performance of Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (SZUS) is non-inferior to that of SonoVue contrast-enhanced ultrasound (SVUS) in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in individuals with high risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was conducted from October 2020 to May 2022 and included participants with a high risk of HCC who underwent SZUS and SVUS. All lesions were confirmed by clinical or pathological diagnosis. Each nodule was classified according to the Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017 (CEUS LI-RADS v2017) for SVUS and SZUS and the modified CEUS LI-RADS (using Kupffer phase defect instead of late and mild washout) for SZUS. The diagnostic performance of both two modalities for all observations was compared. Analysis of the vascular phase and Kupffer phase imaging characteristics of CEUS was performed.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifteen focal liver lesions from 113 patients (94 HCCs, 12 non-HCC malignancies, and 9 benign lesions) were analysed. According to CEUS LI-RADS (v2017), SVUS and SZUS showed similar sensitivity (71.3% vs. 72.3%) and specificity (85.7% vs. 81.0%) in HCC diagnosis. However, the modified CEUS LI-RADS did not significantly improve the diagnostic efficacy of Sonazoid compared to CEUS LI-RADS v2017, having equivalent sensitivity (73.4% vs. 72.3%) and specificity (81.0% vs. 81.0%). The agreement between SVUS and SZUS for all observations was 0.610 (95% CI 0.475, 0.745), while for HCCs it was 0.452 (95% CI 0.257, 0.647).

CONCLUSION

Using LI-RADS v2017, SZUS and SVUS showed non-inferior efficacy in evaluating HCC lesions. In addition, adding Kupffer phase defects to SZUS does not notably improve its diagnostic efficacy.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with microbubbles containing sulfur hexafluoride and perfluorobutane with Kupffer phase for the detection of colorectal liver metastases

OBJECTIVE

To compare contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with microbubbles containing sulfur hexafluoride (SHF) and perfluorobutane (PFB) for the detection of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).

METHODS

In this prospective study, conducted from September to November 2021, patients with colorectal cancer were consecutively recruited and underwent same-day ultrasound, SHF-CEUS, and PFB-CEUS. The reference standard was contrast-enhanced MRI and follow-up imaging. The size, depth, echogenicity, and calcification of each focal liver lesion were recorded. The number and conspicuity of CRLMs, based on washout appearance during the late phase (LP) (> 120 s)/Kupffer phase (KP), were evaluated offsite by two blinded readers.

RESULTS

Overall, 230 lesions (CRLMs, n = 219; benign lesions, n = 11) in 78 patients were evaluated. Lesion conspicuity (p = 0.344) and accuracy in the detection of CRLM were comparable for SHF- and PFB-CEUS (0.877 for SHF vs. 0.770 for PFB, p = 0.087). More CRLMs ≥ 10 mm were identified by LP contrast washout in SHF-CEUS than in KP PFB-CEUS (p < 0.001). More CRLMs < 10 mm were identified by KP washout in PFB-CEUS than in LP SHF-CEUS (p < 0.001). Conspicuity was better on PFB-CEUS than on SHF-CEUS (p = 0.027). In hyperechoic lesions, lesions located deeper than 80 mm, and calcified lesions, CRLM conspicuity on PFB-CEUS was inferior to that on SHF-CEUS (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall accuracy of detection and conspicuity of washout in CRLMs were comparable between SHF and PFB-CEUS. PFB-CEUS has the advantage of identifying washout in small CRLMs. However, larger, hyperechogenic, deep-seated, or calcified lesions were better identified using SHF-CEUS.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Accuracy of detection and conspicuity of washout in CRLMs were comparable between SHF- and PFB-CEUS. PFB-CEUS has the advantage in detecting small CRLMs, whereas SHF-CEUS is better for detecting larger, hyperechogenic, deep-seated, or calcified lesions.

KEY POINTS

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with sulfur hexafluoride in the late phase and perfluorobutane microbubbles in the Kupffer phase were comparable in terms of accuracy in the detection and conspicuity of colorectal liver metastases. Small colorectal liver metastases (< 10 mm) were more often identified in the Kupffer phase contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging when using perfluorobutane microbubbles. Larger, hyperechogenic, deep-seated, or calcified lesions were better identified in the late phase contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging (> 120 s) when using sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles.

Deep learning approach for discrimination of liver lesions using nine time-phase images of contrast-enhanced ultrasound

PURPOSE

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) shows different enhancement patterns depending on the time after administration of the contrast agent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of liver nodule characterization using our proposed deep learning model with input of nine CEUS images.

METHODS

A total of 181 liver lesions (48 benign, 78 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and 55 non-HCC malignant) were included in this prospective study. CEUS were performed using the contrast agent Sonazoid, and in addition to B-mode images before injection, image clips were stored every minute up to 10 min. A deep learning model was developed by arranging three ResNet50 transfer learning models in parallel. This proposed model allowed inputting up to nine datasets of different phases of CEUS and performing image augmentation of nine images synchronously. Using the results, the correct prediction rate, sensitivity, and specificity between "benign" and "malignant" cases were analyzed for each combination of the time phase. These accuracy values were also compared with the washout score judged by a human.

RESULTS

The proposed model showed performance superior to the referential standard model when the dataset from B-mode to the 10-min images were used (sensitivity: 93.2%, specificity: 65.3%, average correct answer rate: 60.1%). It also maintained 90.2% sensitivity and 61.2% specificity even when the dataset was limited to 2 min after injection, and this accuracy was equivalent to or better than human scoring by experts.

CONCLUSION

Our proposed model has the potential to identify tumor types earlier than the Kupffer phase, but at the same time, machine learning confirmed that Kupffer-phase Sonazoid images contain essential information for the classification of liver nodules.

Impact of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumor Size on Sonazoid Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Enhancement Features

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the work described here was to evaluate the impact of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumor size on Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) enhancement features, especially in tumors with diameters ≤30 mm and <10 mm.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included patients with histopathologically confirmed HCC lesions and divided them into three groups on the basis of tumor size. All patients underwent Sonazoid-enhanced CEUS examinations before surgery. B-mode ultrasound (BMUS) features and CEUS enhancement patterns were evaluated according to current World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Guidelines criteria. The χ2- and Student t-tests were used to compare differences between groups.

RESULTS

We included 132 patients with histopathologically confirmed HCC lesions from November 2020 to September 2022. On the basis of tumor size, patients were divided into group 1 (<10 mm, n = 5), group 2 (10-30 mm, n = 54) and group 3 (>30 mm, n = 73). On BMUS, most HCCs appeared heterogeneous but predominantly hypo-echoic (61.4%, 81/132) with ill-defined margins and irregular shapes. Meanwhile, iso-echoic features were more common in small HCCs ≤30 mm (15.3%, 9/59), but a mixed hyper- and hypo-echoic appearance was more common in HCCs >30 mm (17.8%, 13/73) (p = 0.003). On Sonazoid-enhanced CEUS, all HCCs presented arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) (100.0%, 132/132). Most HCCs >30 mm exhibited heterogeneous hyperenhancement (86.3%, 63/73), whereas nearly one-third of small HCCs ≤30 mm exhibited homogeneous hyperenhancement (35.6%, 21/59) (p = 0.003). In the portal venous phase, there was a significantly higher proportion of washout in HCCs >30 mm (84.9%, 62/73) than in small HCCs ≤30 mm (64.4%, 38/59) (p = 0.006). During the Kupffer phase, 11 additional hypo-enhanced lesions (mean size: 14.1 ± 4.1 mm, iso-echoic on BMUS), which were also suspected to be HCC lesions, were detected in 5 patients with small HCCs ≤30 mm and 4 patients with HCCs >30 mm. All 5 cases of HCCs <10 mm exhibited APHE and late washout (>60 s). The majority (3/5, 60%) exhibited washout in the portal venous phase (70, 74 and 75 s), one case did so in the late phase (125 s) and another in the Kupffer phase (420 s).

CONCLUSION

Tumor size had a significant impact on the washout features of HCC lesions on Sonazoid-enhanced CEUS. Small HCC lesions ≤30 mm had a higher proportion of relatively late washout in comparison to larger lesions. Sonazoid-enhanced CEUS might be helpful in the detection and characterization of HCC lesions <10 mm.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting prostate cancer based on combining contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound and biparametric MRI imaging

Objectives

This study was to explore the feasibility of combining contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound (CE-TRUS) with biparametric MRI (CEUS-BpMRI) score for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods

A total of 183 patients with suspected PCa who underwent multiparametric MRI (Mp-MRI) and CE-TRUS were included. CEUS-BpMRI score was developed based on the results of Mp-MRI and CE-TRUS. The diagnostic performance was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC). The diagnostic efficacy of the CEUS-BpMRI score, BpMRI score, and PI-RADS v2.1 score were compared. Total patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort (70%) or validation cohort (30%). A nomogram was constructed based on univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The model was evaluated by AUC and calibration curve.

Results

The diagnostic performance of CEUS-BpMRI score (AUC 0.857) was comparable to that of PI-RADS v2.1 (AUC 0.862) (P = 0.499), and both were superior to Bp-MRI score (AUC 0.831, P < 0.05). In peripheral zone lesions with Bp-MRI score of 3, there was no statistically significant difference between PI-RADS v2.1 score (AUC 0.728) and CEUS-BpMRI score (AUC 0.668) (P = 0.479). Multivariate analysis showed that age, total prostate specific antigen/free prostate specific antigen (F/T), time to peak (TTP), and CEUS-BpMRI score were independent factors. The AUC of the nomogram was 0.909 in the training cohort and 0.914 in the validation cohort.

Conclusions

CEUS-BpMRI score has high diagnostic efficacy for diagnosing PCa. A nomogram model established by combining age, F/T, TTP, and CEUS-BpMRI score can achieve the best predictive accuracy for PCa.

Nomogram based on Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound to differentiate intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model based on Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (SCEUS) and clinical features to discriminate poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (P-HCC) from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Forty-one ICC and forty-nine P-HCC patients were enrolled in this study. The CEUS LI-RADS category was assigned according to CEUS LI-RADS version 2017. Based on SCEUS and clinical features, a predicated model was established. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and LASSO logistic regression were used to identify the most valuable features, 400 times repeated 3-fold cross-validation was performed on the nomogram model and the model performance was determined by its discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression and LASSO logistic regression indicated that age (> 51 y), viral hepatitis (No), AFP level (≤  20 µg/L), washout time (≤  45 s), and enhancement level in the Kupffer phase (Defect) were valuable predictors related to ICC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) of the nomogram was 0.930 (95% CI: 0.856-0.973), much higher than the subjective assessment by the sonographers and CEUS LI-RADS categories. The calibration curve showed that the predicted incidence was more consistent with the actual incidence of ICC, and 400 times repeated 3-fold cross-validation revealed good discrimination with a mean AUC of 0.851. Decision curve analysis showed that the nomogram could increase the net benefit for patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram based on SCEUS and clinical features can effectively differentiate P-HCC from ICC.

A review of contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue® and Sonazoid™ in non-hepatic organs

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a dependable modality for the diagnosis of various clinical conditions. A judicious selection of ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) is imperative for optimizing imaging and improving diagnosis. Approved UCAs for imaging the majority of organs include SonoVue, a pure blood agent, and Sonazoid, which exhibits an additional Kupffer phase. Despite the fact that the two UCAs are increasingly being employed, there is a lack of comparative reviews between the two agents in different organs diseases. This review represents the first attempt to compare the two UCAs in non-hepatic organs, primarily including breast, thyroid, pancreas, and spleen diseases. Through comparative analysis, this review provides a comprehensive and objective evaluation of the performance characteristics of SonoVue and Sonazoid, with the aim of offering valuable guidance for the clinical application of CEUS. Overall, further clinical evidences are required to compare and contrast the dissimilarities between the two UCAs in non-hepatic organs, enabling clinicians to make an appropriate selection based on actual clinical applications.

Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Sonazoid Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography: 2023 Guidelines From the Korean Society of Radiology and the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology

Sonazoid, a second-generation ultrasound contrast agent, was introduced for the diagnosis of hepatic nodules. To clarify the issues with Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the Korean Society of Radiology and Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology collaborated on the guidelines. The guidelines are de novo, evidence-based, and selected using an electronic voting system for consensus. These include imaging protocols, diagnostic criteria for HCC, diagnostic value for lesions that are inconclusive on other imaging results, differentiation from non-HCC malignancies, surveillance of HCC, and treatment response after locoregional and systemic treatment for HCC.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography (CEUS) in Imaging of the Reproductive System in Dogs: A Literature Review

The use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been widely reported for reproductive imaging in humans and animals. This review aims to analyze the utility of CEUS in characterizing canine reproductive physiology and pathologies. In September 2022, a search for articles about CEUS in canine testicles, prostate, uterus, placenta, and mammary glands was conducted on PubMed and Scopus from 1990 to 2022, showing 36 total results. CEUS differentiated testicular abnormalities and neoplastic lesions, but it could not characterize tumors. In prostatic diseases, CEUS in dogs was widely studied in animal models for prostatic cancer treatment. In veterinary medicine, this diagnostic tool could distinguish prostatic adenocarcinomas. In ovaries, CEUS differentiated the follicular phases. In CEH-pyometra syndrome, it showed a different enhancement between endometrium and cysts, and highlighted angiogenesis. CEUS was shown to be safe in pregnant dogs and was able to assess normal and abnormal fetal-maternal blood flow and placental dysfunction. In normal mammary glands, CEUS showed vascularization only in diestrus, with differences between mammary glands. CEUS was not specific for neoplastic versus non-neoplastic masses and for benign tumors, except for complex carcinomas and neoplastic vascularization. Works on CEUS showed its usefulness in a wide spectrum of pathologies of this non-invasive, reliable diagnostic procedure.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound With SonoVue and Sonazoid for the Diagnosis of Colorectal Liver Metastasis After Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic efficacy of SonoVue and Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in correctly detecting and characterizing colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) after chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with CRLMs treated with chemotherapy and subsequently scheduled for hepatic resection were prospectively enrolled from April 2020 to January 2021. Lesions detected by SonoVue or Sonazoid CEUS were recorded as and characterized as metastases or non-metastatic lesions respectively. Histopathology or intraoperative ultrasound with MRI were the reference standard.

RESULTS

A total of 348 focal liver lesions in 42 patients were investigated, including 297 CRLMs and 51 non-metastatic lesions. SonoVue showed significantly higher diagnostic accuracy (64.7% versus 54.0%; P < .001) and sensitivity (63.3% versus 50.5%; P < .001) in the diagnosis of CRLMs than Sonazoid, both methods presented with similar specificity (72.5% versus 74.5%; P = 1.0). Forty metastases appeared non-hypoenhancing (hyperenhancing or isoenhancing) in the late phase and postvascular phase of Sonazoid CEUS and were mischaracterized as benign lesions.

CONCLUSION

SonoVue performed significantly better than Sonazoid in the diagnosis of CRLMs after chemotherapy.

LI-RADS LR-5 on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography has satisfactory diagnostic specificity for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) for contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) was invented to define suspected liver nodules based on their imaging characteristics. Among the categories of nodules of LI-RADS for CEUS, LR-5 is generally considered to be definitely malignant; however, the exact diagnostic performance of this liver nodule category has varied between different studies. Therefore, we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to calculate the pooled diagnostic sensitivity, specificity based on important data extracted from some influential clinical studies.

METHODS

A preliminary search of national and international databases, including PubMed/Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Wan Fang Data, for relevant studies on CEUS LI-RADS LR-5 published between January 2017 and June 2021 was conducted. A literature screening and selection process was undertaken to evaluate the relevance of the articles, and studies deemed eligible for inclusion in the review were subsequently identified. The updated Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool was applied as the main method to assess the risk of bias and applicability of the studies. A meta-analysis of the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of CEUS LI-RADS LR-5 was performed using the free software, Meta-DiSc 1.4 (Ramóny Cajal Hospital, Madrid, Spain). The area under curve (AUC) was calculated to help determine the diagnostic efficiency. A meta-regression analysis was also performed to identify factors that could have contributed to heterogeneity between the studies.

RESULTS

Twelve studies with 20 observations focused on investigating the relative diagnostic performance of the CEUS LI-RADS LR-5 category for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection were finally recruited into the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity was 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-0.72], with heterogeneity (I2) of 88.4%, and the pooled specificity was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92-0.95), with an I2 of 71.2%. Study heterogeneity was observed and statistically correlated with the number of centers and the reference standard.

CONCLUSIONS

The CEUS LI-RADS LR-5 category has satisfactory diagnostic efficacy for HCC, as evidenced by an acceptable diagnostic sensitivity of 0.71 and a good diagnostic specificity of 0.93.

Sonazoid™ versus SonoVue® for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in At-Risk Individuals: A Prospective, Single-Center, Intraindividual, Noninferiority Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasound (SZUS) was noninferior to SonoVue-enhanced ultrasound (SVUS) in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using the same diagnostic criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, single-center, noninferiority study (NCT04847726) enrolled 105 at-risk participants (71 male; mean age ± standard deviation, 63 ± 11 years; range, 26-86 years) with treatment-naïve solid hepatic nodules (≥ 1 cm). All participants underwent same-day SZUS (experimental method) and SVUS (control method) for one representative nodule per participant. Images were interpreted by three readers (the operator and two independent readers). All malignancies were diagnosed histopathologically, while the benignity of other lesions was confirmed by follow-up stability or pathology. The primary endpoint was per-lesion diagnostic accuracy for HCC pooled across three readers using the conventional contrast-enhanced ultrasound diagnostic criteria, including arterial phase hyperenhancement followed by mild (assessed within 2 minutes after contrast injection) and late (≥ 60 seconds with a delay of 5 minutes) washout. The noninferiority delta was -10%p. Furthermore, different time delays were compared as washout criteria in SZUS, including delays of 2, 5, and > 10 minutes.

RESULTS

A total of 105 lesions (HCCs [n = 61], non-HCC malignancies [n = 19], and benign [n = 25]) were evaluated. Using the 5-minutes washout criterion, per-lesion accuracy of SZUS pooled across the three readers (72.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 64.1%-79.3%) was noninferior to that of SVUS (71.4%; 95% CI, 63.1%-78.6%), meeting the statistical criterion for non-inferiority (difference of 0.95%p; 95% CI, -3.8%p-5.7%p). The arterial phase hyperenhancement combined with the 5-minutes washout criterion showed the same sensitivity as that of the > 10-minutes criterion (59.0% vs. 59.0%, p = 0.989), and the specificities were not significantly different (90.9% vs. 86.4%, p = 0.072).

CONCLUSION

SZUS was noninferior to SVUS for diagnosing HCC in at-risk patients using the same diagnostic criteria. No significant improvement in HCC diagnosis was observed by extending the washout time delay from 5 to 10 minutes.

Contrast-Enhanced Intraoperative Ultrasound of the Liver

Contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) is a relatively new but valuable tool that is increasingly used as an adjunct to computed tomography, MRI, and IOUS for patients undergoing liver surgery. CE-IOUS has an important role in 2 main settings: the discrimination of indeterminate lesions detected in cirrhotic livers by conventional IOUS and in the detection of colorectal liver metastasis that may be overlooked by other imaging modalities. The intraoperative nature of the imaging and interpretation allows for CE-IOUS to directly affect surgical decision-making that may importantly affect patient outcomes.

Imaging Features of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Non-Cirrhotic Liver with Sonazoid-Enhanced Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

Purpose: To investigate the Sonazoid-enhanced contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a non-cirrhosis liver background, in comparison to those in liver cirrhosis. Methods: In this retrospective study, 19 patients with surgery and histopathologically proven HCC lesions in non-cirrhosis liver background were included regarding Sonazoid-enhanced CEUS characteristics. Two radiologists evaluated the CEUS features of HCC lesions according to the WFUMB (World Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology) guidelines criteria. Thirty-six patients with HCC lesions in liver cirrhosis were included as a control group. Final diagnoses were confirmed by surgery and histopathological results. Results: Liver background of the non-cirrhosis group including normal liver (n = 7), liver fibrosis (n = 11), and alcoholic liver disease (n = 1). The mean size of non-cirrhosis HCC lesions was 60.8 ± 46.8 mm (ranging from 25 to 219 mm). During the arterial phase of Sonazoid-enhanced CEUS, most HCCs in non-cirrhotic liver (94.7%, 18/19) and in cirrhotic liver (83.3%, 30/36) presented non-rim hyperenhancement. During the portal venous phase, HCC lesions in the non-cirrhosis liver group showed relatively early washout (68.4%, 13/19) (p = 0.090). Meanwhile, HCC lesions in liver cirrhosis background showed isoenhancement (55.6%, 20/36). All lesions in the non-cirrhotic liver group showed hypoenhancement in the late phase and the Kupffer phase (100%, 19/19). Five cases of HCC lesions in liver cirrhosis showed isoenhancement during the late phase and hypoenhancement during the Kupffer phase (13.9%, 5/36). The rest of the cirrhotic HCC lesions showed hypoenhancement during the late phase and the Kupffer phase (86.1%, 31/36). Additional hypoenhanced lesions were detected in three patients in the non-cirrhosis liver group and eight patients in the liver cirrhosis group (mean size: 13.0 ± 5.6 mm), which were also suspected to be HCC lesions. Conclusions: Heterogeneous hyperenhancement during the arterial phase as well as relatively early washout are characteristic features of HCC in the non-cirrhotic liver on Sonazoid-enhanced CEUS.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Features of Histopathologically Proven Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Non-cirrhotic Liver: A Multicenter Study

Current literature on the role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in non-cirrhotic patients is limited. The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to analyze CEUS features of histologically proven HCC in patients with non-cirrhotic liver. In this multicenter study, 96 patients from eight medical institutions with histologically proven HCC lesions in non-cirrhotic liver were retrospectively reviewed regarding SonoVue-enhanced CEUS features. Two ultrasound experts assessed the CEUS enhancement pattern and came to a consensus using the World Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology guideline criteria. The mean size of HCC lesions included was 60.3 ± 37.8 mm (mean ± standard deviation). Most of the lesions were heterogeneous but predominantly hypo-echoic on B-mode ultrasound (64.5%, 62/96), with ill-defined margins and irregular shapes. During the arterial phase of CEUS, most of the HCC lesions in non-cirrhotic liver exhibited heterogeneous hyperenhancement (78.1%, 75/96) compared with the surrounding liver parenchyma. Almost 30% of HCC lesions (28.1%, 27/96) exhibited early wash-out (<60 s). All lesions exhibited wash-out and hypo-enhancement in the late phase. CEUS features of HCC lesions in non-cirrhotic patients typically include hyperenhancement in the arterial phase and relatively rapid wash-out in the portal venous phase, which is different from HCC in cirrhotic livers and more similar to liver metastasis.

Protocol of Kupffer phase whole liver scan for metastases: A single-center prospective study

Introduction

As the presence of hepatic metastases is very important to cancer patients' clinical stage which would directly affect the selection and application of anti-cancer treatments. Although conventional ultrasound is commonly performed as a screening tool, most of the examinations have relatively poor sensitivity and specificity for detecting liver metastases. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with Sonazoid has been reported to have the advantage of the diagnosis and therapeutic support of focal hepatic lesions and its specific Kupffer phase whole liver scan (KPWLS) is believed to be sensitive to detect liver metastases. And the purpose of this study is to determine the number, size, location and diagnosis of metastatic lesions, and to compare the results with conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), thus to clarify the application value, indications of Sonazoid-CEUS in screening liver metastasis.

Methods and analysis

Kupffer phase whole liver scan for metastases (KPWLSM) is a self-control, blind map-reading, single-center, prospective superiority trial. Approved by the institutional review committee, the study period is planned to be from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2025. Our study will include 330 patients with history of malignant tumors that cling to metastasize to liver. All patients will undergo the examinations of conventional ultrasound, Sonazoid-CEUS, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI), and 65 of them should have additional CECT scans. The primary endpoint is the comparative analysis of the numbers of detected liver metastatic lesions among Sonazoid-CEUS, conventional ultrasound and CECT in screening liver metastases. Subjective conditions of patient after injection of Sonazoid will be followed up 3 and 30 days after KPWLSM, and any short-term and long-term adverse events are to be recorded with telephone interviews.

Ethics and dissemination

This study has been granted by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital (Approval No: 2021-197). When the KPWLSM is completed, we will publish it in an appropriate journal to promote further widespread use.

Registration

Trial Registration Number and Date of Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100054385, December 16, 2021.

Discrepancy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic pattern with two contrast agents in steatohepatitic subtype hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is one of the important imaging modalities for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sonovue and Sonazoid are the third-generation of ultrasound contrast agents that have been commercialized and widely used in clinical applications. This study introduces the imaging differences between these two agents in vascular phases for the first time. A 54-year-old man clinical suspected liver cancer. He had chronic hepatitis B for more than 20 years. The result of alpha-fetoprotein was 36.45μg/L (normal< 20μg/L). The imaging pattern of CEUS with Sonovue was “fast-in and fast-out” performance, while the pattern of “fast-out” was absent after portal phase with Sonazoid, even in Kupffer phase. The lesion was diagnosed as lipid-rich HCC by contrast-enhanced MRI. After liver resection, pathology revealed that it was hepatocellular carcinoma contained poor-differentiated steatohepatitis subtype and moderate-differentiated microtrabecular subtype. The imaging difference mainly existed in the part of steatohepatitis subtype. Steatohepatitis subtype HCC can be showed as “fast-in and no wash-out” characteristic in Sonazoid CEUS. Though the mechanism remains not fully clarified, this different enhancing pattern may provide a potential for the supplement of the guidelines and differential of steatohepatitis subtype HCC.