Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis as a predictor of survival in metastatic melanoma

Immune checkpoint blockade for cancer therapy: current progress and perspectives

Dysfunction of anti-tumor immune responses is crucial for cancer progression. Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), which can potentiate T cell responses, is an effective strategy for the normalization of host anti-tumor immunity. In recent years, immune checkpoints, expressed on both tumor cells and immune cells, have been identified; some of them have exhibited potential druggability and have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for clinical treatment. However, limited responses and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) cannot be ignored. This review outlines the development and applications of ICBs, potential strategies for overcoming resistance, and future directions for ICB-based cancer immunotherapy.

Immune-mediated colitis after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have led to improved outcome in patients with various types of cancer. Due to inhibition of physiological anti-inflammatory mechanisms, patients treated with ICIs may develop autoimmune inflammation of the colon, associated with morbidity, decreased quality of life (QoL), and mortality. In this review, we summarize clinical and pathophysiological aspects of immune-mediated colitis (ImC), highlighting novel treatment options. In the colon, ICIs trigger resident and circulating T cell activation and infiltration of myeloid cells. In addition, the gut microbiota critically contribute to intestinal immune dysregulation and loss of barrier function, thereby propagating local and systemic inflammation. Currently available therapies for ImC include corticosteroids, antitumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)- and anti-integrin α4β7 antibodies. Given that systemic immunosuppression might impair antitumor immune responses, novel therapeutic approaches are urgently needed.

Gastrointestinal toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy: risks and management

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have greatly improved cancer treatment by boosting the immune system's ability to target tumors. However, they can also cause serious side effects, particularly in the digestive system. These include immune-related diarrhea, inflammation of the intestines and, less commonly, inflammation of the stomach or esophagus. This review underscores the importance of early detection, accurate diagnosis, and timely treatment to improve patient outcomes. It also highlights the need for further research to develop strategies to reduce gastrointestinal toxicities and enhance the overall effectiveness of ICIs in cancer therapy.

Organ-specific immune-related adverse events and prognosis in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Patients who developed immune-related adverse events (irAEs) could benefit more from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) than those who did not develop irAEs. This study was designed to assess whether the occurrence of irAEs or their characteristics are correlated with survival in advanced patients treated with ICIs.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study enrolled a panel of cancer patients who received ICIs at a single institute. Kaplan‒Meier curves were generated to describe progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with irAEs or specific irAE characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 238 patients were enrolled, 83 (34.9%) of whom developed at least one irAE. Overall, irAE development was associated with prolonged OS (not reached vs. 17.8 months, P < 0.001), PFS (8.7 vs. 4.8 months, P = 0.003), and an improved objective response rate (24.1% vs. 10.3%, P = 0.005). Furthermore, only skin or endocrine toxicities were associated with improved OS and PFS. On the basis of the results from organ-specific irAEs, the first development of skin or endocrine toxicities as protective irAEs rather than other irAEs was an independent indicator for predicting OS (P < 0.001) and PFS (P < 0.001). A protective irAE burden score based on organ-specific irAEs was further developed to show the significant protective effect of total irAEs on patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Not all irAEs are associated with prolonged survival. The identification of organ-specific irAEs is useful for stratifying patients who actually respond to and benefit from ICIs across different cancer types.

Identification of risk factors for gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events associated with immune check point inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities are among the most common and potentially severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and data on risk factors remain limited. This study aimed to identify risk factors for GI-irAEs in patients treated with ICIs.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with any type of malignant tumor who received ICIs between January 2020 and January 2022. GI-irAEs were defined as the onset of diarrhea during the observation period. Univariate analysis was employed to explore associations between GI-irAEs and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 485 patients screened, 361 were eligible for analysis. GI-irAEs occurred in 29 patients (8.03%). Patients with GI cancer demonstrated shorter event-free survival (EFS) compared to those with non-GI cancer (2.33, 95% CI: 1.03-4.95; p = 0.0275). Additionally, ≥ grade 2 GI-irAEs were observed in 14 patients (3.88%). Patients with GU cancer had a significantly higher incidence of GI-irAEs (odds ratio: 3.26, 95%CI 1.21-8.71, p = 0.0497) and exhibited shorter EFS (hazard ratio: 3.07, 95%CI: 1.05-8.96; p = 0.0273) compared to those with non-GU cancer.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that GI cancer may be a risk factor for developing GI-irAEs, while GU cancer may predispose patients to ≥ grade 2 GI-irAEs.

Systematic review of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, and pancreatic adverse events

Gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events (GI irAEs) are common manifestations of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) toxicity. We present a comprehensive systematic review of the incidence, management, and clinical course of irAEs across the entire GI system, including the luminal GI tract, liver, and pancreas. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Library were used to conduct this review. All studies pertaining to GI irAEs were included. Both abstracts and full manuscripts were eligible if they included human subjects and were written in the English language. Articles not available in English, animal studies, or research not specific to GI toxicity of immunotherapy were excluded. We excluded certain article types depending on whether stronger evidence was available in the literature for a specific toxicity, for example, if prospective studies were available on a topic, retrospective studies and case reports were excluded. We extracted a final 166 articles for our review and followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for data reporting. Risk of bias tools were not used to evaluate the extracted studies given the narrative nature of this manuscript, but each study was critically appraised by the manuscript writer. We detail the incidence, presentation, evaluation, management, and outcomes of the various GI toxicities that may arise with ICI therapy. Specifically, we discuss the characteristics of upper GI toxicity (esophagitis and gastroenteritis), lower GI toxicity (colitis), hepatobiliary inflammation, pancreatitis, and rarer forms of GI toxicity. We hope this review serves as a useful and accessible clinical tool that helps physicians familiarize themselves with the nuances of gastrointestinal/hepatic/pancreatic ICI toxicity diagnosis and management.

Correlation of safety and efficacy of atezolizumab therapy across indications

BACKGROUND

The association between safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is known, but the correlation between severity and impact of specific organ involvement by immune-related adverse events (irAE) and cancer outcomes is poorly understood. Most irAEs are mild-to-moderate but severe irAEs may pose clinical management challenges and affect patient outcomes.

METHODS

We assessed the association between irAE grade (G) and specific organ involvement with overall survival (OS) in 9,521 patients across 14 studies involving atezolizumab as mono (IO) or with chemo/targeted (C-IO) therapy as compared with chemo/targeted therapy (C) in advanced non-small cell lung, small-cell lung, renal cell, urothelial, and triple-negative breast cancers. We used a mixed-effect Cox proportional hazard model for time-varying covariates to address immortal-time bias; adjusted for baseline factors associated with irAEs and OS to control for confounding bias; and focused on five common irAEs (dermatologic, thyroid dysfunction, hepatitis, pneumonitis, and colitis) to avoid low statistical power for rare events.

RESULTS

For patients treated with IO or C-IO, G1-2 irAEs were associated with improved OS (HR=0.65, p<0.01) and G3-4 irAEs showed a slight increased risk of death (HR=1.18, p=0.10) versus patients without irAEs. By specific irAE, G1-2 cutaneous irAEs, thyroid dysfunction, or pneumonitis were associated with improved OS (p<0.05), while G3-4 pneumonitis and colitis were associated with worse OS (p<0.01). There was no association between hepatitis and OS by any grade. Findings were consistent across indications.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis demonstrates a correlation between irAEs and improved OS with atezolizumab by severity grade and the most common irAEs by organ involvement. Low-grade irAEs are significantly associated with improved OS, while specific high-grade irAEs are associated with poorer OS, underscoring the importance of early recognition and management of toxicity to optimize benefit/risk balance.

Peptic ulcer induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors successfully treated with glucocorticoids: A report of three cases and a literature review

In recent decades, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as safer and less disruptive alternatives to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy for certain patients with tumours. ICIs serve a synergistic role alongside conventional therapies by manipulating the immune system to recognise and target tumour cells. However, excessive activation of the immune system can lead to immune-related adverse events including pneumonia, myocarditis and colitis, which pose serious and even fatal risks. In the present case series, three patients with a thoracic tumour with an ICI-induced peptic ulcer triggered by programmed cell death protein 1 antibodies (diagnosed by gastrointestinal endoscopy) are presented. These cases were successfully treated with corticosteroids. The diagnostic and treatment processes undertaken for these patients underscore the requirement to comprehensively understand the mechanism of ICI-induced peptic ulcer. Moreover, the relevant literature was also reviewed in the present study.

Prognostic relevance of immune-related adverse events in lung cancer patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) work by activating the immune system, a mechanism that may also cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study seeks to investigate on how different irAEs impact prognosis of advanced lung cancer (LC) patients and identify useful approaches to manage irAEs.

Methods

A thorough literature search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and manual searches up to January 2024 were undertaken. Treatment outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were obtained. Meta-analysis was conducted using R software (version 4.3.1).

Results

There were 106 studies with 41,050 advanced or recurrent LC patients included. The occurrence of irAEs was correlated with better PFS [hazard ratio (HR) =0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49-0.59], OS (HR =0.57; 0.51-0.63), ORR [risk ratio (RR) =2.03; 95% CI: 1.81-2.28] and DCR (RR =1.55; 95% CI: 1.40-1.72) and remained significant after adjusting programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) level. IrAEs affecting skin (OS: HR =0.45; 95% CI: 0.38-0.53) and endocrine system (OS: HR =0.51; 95% CI: 0.41-0.62), of mild severity (OS: HR =0.52; 95% CI: 0.35-0.79), arising in multiple sites (OS: HR =0.47; 95% CI: 0.38-0.59), induced by monotherapy (OS: HR =0.58; 95% CI: 0.52-0.65), with a delayed onset (cutoff: 3 months; OS: HR =0.37; 95% CI: 0.19-0.71) were identified as positive prognostic markers. In contrast, though pulmonary irAEs were found to be corelated with enhanced treatment response (ORR: RR =1.75; 95% CI: 1.37-2.25), they may harm survival, especially those with grade ≥3 (OS: HR =2.40; 95% CI: 1.39-4.14). Treatment resumption tended to improve PFS but might not reduce the risk of death compared to permanent discontinuation.

Conclusions

IrAEs suggest better treatment outcomes generally, yet severe pneumonia could increase mortality risk. Close supervision and appropriate handling protocols are warranted to weigh treatment benefit against risk.

Management of liver and gastrointestinal toxicity induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: Position statement of the AEEH-AEG-SEPD-SEOM-GETECCU

The development of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is one of the most remarkable achievements in cancer therapy in recent years. However, their exponential use has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Gastrointestinal and liver events encompass hepatitis, colitis and upper digestive tract symptoms accounting for the most common irAEs, with incidence rates varying from 2% to 40%, the latter in patients undergoing combined ICIs therapy. Based on the current scientific evidence derived from both randomized clinical trials and real-world studies, this statement document provides recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the gastrointestinal and hepatic ICI-induced adverse events.

Polygenic risk score for ulcerative colitis predicts immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis (IMC) is a common adverse event of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We hypothesize that genetic susceptibility to Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) predisposes to IMC. In this study, we first develop a polygenic risk scores for CD (PRSCD) and UC (PRSUC) in cancer-free individuals and then test these PRSs on IMC in a cohort of 1316 patients with ICI-treated non-small cell lung cancer and perform a replication in 873 ICI-treated pan-cancer patients. In a meta-analysis, the PRSUC predicts all-grade IMC (ORmeta=1.35 per standard deviation [SD], 95% CI = 1.12-1.64, P = 2×10-03) and severe IMC (ORmeta=1.49 per SD, 95% CI = 1.18-1.88, P = 9×10-04). PRSCD is not associated with IMC. Furthermore, PRSUC predicts severe IMC among patients treated with combination ICIs (ORmeta=2.20 per SD, 95% CI = 1.07-4.53, P = 0.03). Overall, PRSUC can identify patients receiving ICI at risk of developing IMC and may be useful to monitor patients and improve patient outcomes.

Management of liver and gastrointestinal toxicity induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: Position statement of the AEEH-AEG-SEPD-SEOM-GETECCU

The development of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is one of the most remarkable achievements in cancer therapy in recent years. However, their exponential use has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Gastrointestinal and liver events encompass hepatitis, colitis and upper digestive tract symptoms accounting for the most common irAEs, with incidence rates varying from 2 % to 40 %, the latter in patients undergoing combined ICIs therapy. Based on the current scientific evidence derived from both randomized clinical trials and real-world studies, this statement document provides recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the gastrointestinal and hepatic ICI-induced adverse events.

A case of refractory immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis improved by the treatment with vedolizumab and granulocyte-monocyte apheresis combination therapy

A 68-year-old man developed immune-related adverse event (irAE) colitis after the initiation of nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy for malignant melanoma. We diagnosed the patient with grade 3 irAE colitis and started prednisolone (1 mg/kg/day). Although the symptom improved once, it worsened along with the tapering of prednisolone. Therefore, we started infliximab (IFX). However, symptoms did not improve after two doses of IFX. We discontinued IFX and initiated vedolizumab (VED). Because VED alone did not improve the symptom, we started granulocyte-monocyte apheresis (GMA). Twelve weeks after the onset, the colitis was in remission. Therefore, in addition to vedolizumab, GMA may be considered in cases refractory to treatment.

Gut microbiome for predicting immune checkpoint blockade-associated adverse events

BACKGROUND

The impact of the gut microbiome on the initiation and intensity of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) prompted by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is widely acknowledged. Nevertheless, there is inconsistency in the gut microbial associations with irAEs reported across various studies.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive analysis leveraging a dataset that included published microbiome data (n = 317) and in-house generated data from 16S rRNA and shotgun metagenome samples of irAEs (n = 115). We utilized a machine learning-based approach, specifically the Random Forest (RF) algorithm, to construct a microbiome-based classifier capable of distinguishing between non-irAEs and irAEs. Additionally, we conducted a comprehensive analysis, integrating transcriptome and metagenome profiling, to explore potential underlying mechanisms.

RESULTS

We identified specific microbial species capable of distinguishing between patients experiencing irAEs and non-irAEs. The RF classifier, developed using 14 microbial features, demonstrated robust discriminatory power between non-irAEs and irAEs (AUC = 0.88). Moreover, the predictive score from our classifier exhibited significant discriminative capability for identifying non-irAEs in two independent cohorts. Our functional analysis revealed that the altered microbiome in non-irAEs was characterized by an increased menaquinone biosynthesis, accompanied by elevated expression of rate-limiting enzymes menH and menC. Targeted metabolomics analysis further highlighted a notably higher abundance of menaquinone in the serum of patients who did not develop irAEs compared to the irAEs group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study underscores the potential of microbial biomarkers for predicting the onset of irAEs and highlights menaquinone, a metabolite derived from the microbiome community, as a possible selective therapeutic agent for modulating the occurrence of irAEs.

Evaluating Survival After Hospitalization Due to Immune-Related Adverse Events From Checkpoint Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

As immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) are increasingly approved for cancer treatment, hospitalizations related to severe immune-related adverse events (irAE) will increase. Here, we identify patients hospitalized due to irAEs and describe survival outcomes across irAE, CPI, and cancer type.

METHODS

We identified patients hospitalized at our institution from January 2012 to December 2020 due to irAEs. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Of 3137 patients treated with CPIs, 114 (3.6%) were hospitalized for irAEs, resulting in 124 hospitalizations. Gastrointestinal (GI)/hepatic, endocrine, and pulmonary irAEs were the most common causes of irAE-related hospitalization. After CPI initiation, the average time to hospitalization was 141 days. Median survival from hospital admission was 980 days. Patients hospitalized due to GI/hepatic and endocrine irAEs had longer median survival than patients with pulmonary irAEs (795 and 949 days vs. 83 days [P < .001]). Patients with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma had longer median survival than patients with lung cancer (2792 days and not reached vs. 159 days [P < .001]). There was longer median survival in the combination group compared to the PD-(L)1 group (1471 vs. 529 days [P = .04]).

CONCLUSIONS

As CPI use increases, irAE-related hospitalizations will as well. These findings suggest that among patients hospitalized for irAEs, survival differs by irAE and cancer type, with worse survival for patients with irAE pneumonitis or lung cancer. This real-world data contributes to research pertaining to hospitalization due to severe irAEs, which may inform patient counseling and treatment decision-making.

Polygenic risk score for ulcerative colitis predicts immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a remarkable advancement in cancer therapeutics; however, a substantial proportion of patients develop severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Understanding and predicting irAEs is a key to advancing precision immuno-oncology. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis (IMC) is a significant complication from ICI and can have life-threatening consequences. Based on clinical presentation, IMC mimics inflammatory bowel disease, however the link is poorly understood. We hypothesized that genetic susceptibility to Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) may predispose to IMC. We developed and validated polygenic risk scores for CD (PRSCD) and UC (PRSUC) in cancer-free individuals and assessed the role of each of these PRSs on IMC in a cohort of 1,316 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received ICIs. Prevalence of all-grade IMC in our cohort was 4% (55 cases), and for severe IMC, 2.5% (32 cases). The PRSUC predicted the development of all-grade IMC (HR=1.34 per standard deviation [SD], 95% CI=1.02-1.76, P=0.04) and severe IMC (HR=1.62 per SD, 95% CI=1.12-2.35, P=0.01). PRSCD was not associated with IMC or severe IMC. The association between PRSUC and IMC (all-grade and severe) was consistent in an independent pan-cancer cohort of patients treated with ICIs. Furthermore, PRSUC predicted severe IMC among patients treated with combination ICIs (OR = 2.20 per SD, 95% CI = 1.07-4.53, P=0.03). This is the first study to demonstrate the potential clinical utility of a PRS for ulcerative colitis in identifying patients receiving ICI at high risk of developing IMC, where risk reduction and close monitoring strategies could help improve overall patient outcomes.

Effects of immunosuppressive treatment on patient outcomes after immune checkpoint inhibitor-related gastrointestinal toxicity

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used in the treatment of certain cancers but cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Gastrointestinal irAEs may necessitate extended periods of steroid use and the initiation of selective immunosuppressive therapy (SIT) which could theoretically counteract the effect of ICIs. In this study, we aim to explore the impact of immunosuppression use and duration on cancer progression and progression-free survival (PFS).

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective review exploring cancer outcomes in patients taking ICIs who developed gastrointestinal irAEs within 1 year of ICI initiation. Cancer outcome and progression free survival (PFS) were measured and compared by using IBM SPSS Statistics 26.

RESULTS

Of the 116 patients included in this study, 69 received immunosuppression to treat irAEs. The occurrence of colitis and use of immunosuppression for colitis were associated with less cancer progression by later assessment (p < 0.05). Shorter durations of steroids with or without SIT for colitis were associated with less cancer progression within the study window than no immunosuppression (p < 0.05). Immunosuppression has no effect on PFS (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our study reported shorter duration of steroid treatment for colitis may be associated with less cancer progression. Though the use of immunosuppression was not found to impact PFS, this may be confounded by the presence of colitis, which is known to improve cancer outcomes and could mask any negative impact of immunosuppression on survival. It may be preferable to limit long-term immunosuppression in the treatment of immune-mediated colitis to minimize potential complications. Prospective studies are needed to clarify this relationship, and treatments that abrogate the need for immunosuppression in these patients such as fecal microbiota transplantation.

Characteristics, treatment, and outcome of diverticulitis after immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in patients with malignancies

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are efficacious for treating various malignancies. In addition to immune-related adverse events (irAEs), growing evidence suggests that ICIs might also be associated with diverticulitis. We aim to assess the clinical presentations and management of colonic diverticulitis among cancer patients after ICI treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on ICI-treated adult cancer patients between 01/2010 and 06/2020. Patients were grouped based on when diverticulitis developed relative to ICI treatment, either before (controls) or after (cases). Patient clinical characters, treatment, and outcomes were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

77 eligible patients were included: 63 patients developed diverticulitis after ICI exposure (46 had initial episode after ICI exposure, 17 had a history of diverticulitis prior then recurred after ICI exposure), and 14 had diverticulitis before ICI exposure. Diverticulitis occurred after a median of 129 days after ICI initiation. Clinical characteristics overlapped with traditional diverticulitis. 93% of patients had symptom resolution after treatment, while 23.8% experienced complications. These patients exhibited higher rates of hospitalization (87% vs 48%, P = 0.015) and surgery/interventional radiology procedures (27% vs 0, P = 0.002), and worse overall survival (P = 0.022). History of diverticulitis was not associated with a more severe disease course. Immunosuppressants (e.g., corticosteroids) were rarely required unless for concurrent ICI-mediated colitis.

CONCLUSION

Colonic diverticulitis can occur after ICI therapy at very low incidence (0.5%). Its clinical presentation, evaluation, and management are similar to traditional diverticulitis, but associated with higher complication rates requiring surgical intervention and has lower overall survival.

Position statement on the management of the immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis via multidisciplinary modified Delphi consensus

INTRODUCTION

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer immunotherapy has shown increased overall survival in a wide range of cancer types with the associated risk of developing severe immune-mediated adverse events, commonly involving the gastrointestinal tract.

AIM

The aim of this position statement is to provide an updated practice advice to the gastroenterologists and oncologists on the diagnosis and management of ICI-induced gastrointestinal toxicity.

METHODOLOGY

The evidence reviewed in this paper includes a comprehensive search strategy of English language publications. Consensus was reached using a three-round modified Delphi methodology and approved by the members of the Belgian Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research and Development Group (BIRD), Belgian Society of Medical Oncology (BSMO), Belgian group of Digestive Oncology (BGDO), and Belgian Respiratory Society (BeRS).

CONCLUSIONS

The management of ICI-induced colitis requires an early multidisciplinary approach. A broad initial assessment is necessary (clinical presentation, laboratory markers, endoscopic and histologic examination) to confirm the diagnosis. Criteria for hospitalisation, management of ICIs, and initial endoscopic assessment are proposed. Even if corticosteroids are still considered the first-line therapy, biologics are recommended as an escalation therapy and as early treatment in patients with high-risk endoscopic findings.

Immune-related adverse events in checkpoint blockade: Observations from human tissue and therapeutic considerations

Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are monoclonal antibodies which, by disrupting interactions of immune checkpoint molecules with their ligands, block regulatory immune signals otherwise exploited by cancers. Despite revolutionary clinical benefits, CPI use is associated with an array of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that mirror spontaneous autoreactivity. Severe irAEs necessitate pausing or stopping of CPI therapy and use of corticosteroids and/or other immunomodulatory interventions. Despite increasingly widespread CPI use, irAE pathobiology remains poorly understood; its elucidation may point to targeted mitigation strategies and uncover predictive biomarkers for irAE onset in patients, whilst casting new light on mechanisms of spontaneous immune-mediated disease. This review focuses on common CPI-induced irAEs of the gut, skin and synovial joints, and how these compare to immune-mediated diseases such as ulcerative colitis, vitiligo and inflammatory arthritis. We review current understanding of the immunological changes reported following CPI therapy at the level of peripheral blood and tissue. Many studies highlight dysregulation of cytokines in irAE-affected tissue, particularly IFNγ and TNF. IrAE-affected tissues are also predominantly infiltrated by T-cells, with low B-cell infiltration. Whilst there is variability between studies, patients treated with anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/PDL-1 therapies seem to exhibit CD8+ T-cell dominance, with CD4+ T-cells dominating in those treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) monotherapy. Interestingly, CD8+CXCR3+ T-cells have been reported to be elevated in gastrointestinal, dermatological and musculoskeletal -irAE affected tissues. These findings may highlight potential opportunities for therapeutic development or re-deployment of existing therapies to prevent and/or improve the outcome of irAEs.

Long survival in a pancreatic carcinoma patient with multi-organ toxicities after sintilimab treatment: A case report

Pancreatic carcinoma is the leading cause of death among digestive malignancies in China. In particular, there is no breakthrough in prolonging the survival of pancreatic cancer patients with chemical and targeted therapies. Tumor immunotherapy brings opportunities and progress for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Sintilimab is an innovative PD-1 inhibitor which was reported certain clinical benefits in multi-line treatments of advanced pancreatic cancer with gemcitabine. The combination therapy of PD-1 with gemcitabine plus high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in pancreatic cancer has not been reported. Here we report a case of a Chinese old patient diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Two months after sintilimab treatment, the patient occurred severe immune colitis. The patient was diagnosed with immune ureteritis after 8 months of treatment. The immue-related adverse events (irAEs) refined after timely recognition and correct intervention by the clinician and clinical pharmacist. After first-line treatment of sintilimab plus gemcitabine combined with pancreatic HIFU, the patient achieved a remarkable benefit of 11-month progression-free survival (PFS) and 20-month overall survival (OS). The first-line treatment of sintilimab plus gemcitabine combined with HIFU demonstrates a potential therapeutic effect on metastatic pancreatic carcinoma with tolerable adverse reactions.

Operative management of immune checkpoint colitis following in-transit melanoma: Case report

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly used as powerful anti-neoplastic therapies in the setting of melanoma. Colitis is a known complication of immune checkpoint inhibitors that if often medically managed. We present a patient with stage IV melanoma with demonstrated in-transit disease undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. The patient subsequently developed recalcitrant severe colitis that necessitated operative intervention and bowel resection. The association of immune check point inhibitors and immune related adverse effects are discussed as well as treatments of advanced colitis, including the possibility of surgical management in the setting of severe colitis with complications.

PD-1 inhibitor-based adverse events in solid tumors: A retrospective real-world study

Background & Aims: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the landscape of cancer treatment, and ICI-related toxicities (i.e., immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been reported in many clinical studies. However, the toxicity data of real-world have not been fully assessed. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed solid tumors who had been treated with PD-1 inhibitors were included in the study. Patient data were collected from electronic medical records, including basic characteristics, data of irAEs, management and outcome. Incidences of irAEs were pooled and compared, and the risk of irAEs was also analyzed. Results: A total of 362 solid tumor patients treated with sintilimab (n = 171), camrelizumab (n = 60), toripalimab (n = 72), and pembrolizumab (n = 59) were included. In total, any grade irAEs, grade 1-2 irAEs, and grade ≥3 irAEs accounted for 47.24%, 38.67% and 8.56% of cases, reapectively. Further, 29.24% of patients discontinued immunotherapy due to irAEs, with pneumonitis being the main reason for discontinuation. By comparing the toxicity profiles between different ICIs, we found that reactive capillary haemangiomas were camrelizumab-specific. Additionally, the frequency of irAEs was association with ICIs type, the pooled incidence (standardized rate) of irAEs related to sintilimab, camrelizumab, toripalimab and pembrolizumab were 55.56% (52.81%), 48.33% (55.55%), 33.33% (29.23%) and 38.98% (38.29%), respectively. Sintilimab and camrelizumab had higher incidences of any grade and grade 1-2 than toripalimab (55.56% vs. 33.33%, p = 0.002; 48.54% vs. 25.00%, p = 0.0001) and pembrolizumab (55.56% vs. 38.98%, p = 0.0028; 48.54% vs. 25.42%, p = 0.002), while the grade ≥3 irAEs of pembrolizumab (13.56%) were approximately 1.63- to 1.93-fold higher than other ICIs, and the standardized grade ≥3 of pembrolizumab was significantly higher than that of sintilimab (13.21% vs. 7.12%, p = 0.026), especially for grade ≥3 pneumonitis. Multivariate analysis found that cumulative cycles of ICI (OR = 1.081; 95% CI: 1.023-1.142; p = 0.006), and lung cancer (OR = 1.765; 95% CI: 1.105-2.820; p = 0.017) were independent risk factors for irAEs. Conclusion: The frequency of irAEs is associated with ICI type. The pooled incidence of irAEs related to sintilimab and pneumonitis caused by pembrolizumab were higher. These data indicate the importance of having different monitoring priorities for different PD-1 inhibitors.

Distinct pretreatment innate immune landscape and posttreatment T cell responses underlie immunotherapy-induced colitis

Immune-related adverse events represent a major hurdle to the success of immunotherapy. The immunological mechanisms underlying their development and relation to antitumor responses are poorly understood. By examining both systemic and tissue-specific immune changes induced by combination anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, we found distinct repertoire changes in patients who developed moderate-severe colitis, irrespective of their antitumor response to therapy. The proportion of circulating monocytes were significantly increased at baseline in patients who subsequently developed colitis compared with patients who did not develop colitis, and biopsies from patients with colitis showed monocytic infiltration of both endoscopically and histopathologically normal and inflamed regions of colon. The magnitude of systemic expansion of T cells following commencement of immunotherapy was also greater in patients who developed colitis. Importantly, we show expansion of specific T cell subsets within inflamed regions of the colon, including tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells and Th1 CD4+ T cells in patients who developed colitis. Our data also suggest that CD8+ T cell expansion was locally induced, while Th1 cell expansion was systemic. Together, our data show that exaggerated innate and T cell responses to combination immunotherapy synergize to propel colitis in susceptible patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis is associated with cancer overall survival

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis (IMC) is a common adverse event following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for cancer. IMC has been associated with improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), but data are limited to a single site and predominantly for melanoma patients.

AIM

To determine the association of IMC with OS and PFS and identify clinical predictors of IMC.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case-control study including 64 ICI users who developed IMC matched according to age, sex, ICI class, and malignancy to a cohort of ICI users without IMC, from May 2011 to May 2020. Using univariate and multivariate logistic regression, we determined association of presence of IMC on OS, PFS, and clinical predictors of IMC. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to compare OS and PFS between ICI users with and without IMC.

RESULTS

IMC was significantly associated with a higher OS (mean 24.3 mo vs 17.7 mo, P = 0.05) but not PFS (mean 13.7 mo vs 11.9 mo, P = 0.524). IMC was significantly associated with OS greater than 12 mo [Odds ratio (OR) 2.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-6.77]. Vitamin D supplementation was significantly associated with increased risk of IMC (OR 2.48, 95%CI 1.01-6.07).

CONCLUSION

IMC was significantly associated with OS greater than 12 mo. In contrast to prior work, we found that vitamin D use may be a risk factor for IMC.

Urinary T cells are detected in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated immune nephritis that are clonotypically identical to kidney T cell infiltrates

Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs in ~20% of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy; however, only 2-5% will develop ICI-mediated immune nephritis. Conventional tests are nonspecific in diagnosing disease pathology and invasive procedures (i.e. kidney biopsy) may not be feasible. In other autoimmune renal diseases, urinary immune cells correlated with the pathology or were predictive of disease activity. Corresponding evidence and analysis are absent for ICI-mediated immune nephritis. We report the first investigation analyzing immune cell profiles of matched kidney biopsies and urine of patients with ICI-AKI. We demonstrated the presence of urinary T cells in patients with immune nephritis by flow cytometry analysis. Clonotype analysis of T cell receptor (TCR) sequences confirmed enrichment of kidney TCRs in urine. As ICI therapies become standard of care for more cancers, noninvasively assessing urinary immune cells of ICI therapy recipients can facilitate clinical management and an opportunity to tailor ICI-nephritis treatment.

Patients with melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors who had non-thyroid endocrine and skin immune-related adverse events have better prognosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Several studies have reported an association between the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and prognosis in patients with melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but the results remain controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the association between irAEs and survival in patients with melanoma treated with ICIs.

Methods

We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases through May 5, 2022 for clinical studies evaluating the association between irAEs and in melanoma patients treated with ICIs. Combined hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models based on heterogeneity.

Results

A total of 60 articles were included, with 16,520 patients. In patients with melanoma treated with ICIs, the occurrence of irAEs was significantly associated with better OS (HR, 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51–0.66; P<0.00001) and PFS (HR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.51–0.72; P<0.00001). Endocrine irAEs (OS, HR, 0.81; 95%CI, 0.72–0.92; P=0.001; PFS: HR, 0.84; 95%CI, 0.73–0.96, P=0.009), skin irAEs (OS, HR, 0.59; 95%CI, 0.41–0.85; P=0.004; PFS: HR, 0.43; 95%CI, 0.36–0.52; P<0.00001), vitiligo (OS, HR, 0.22; 95%CI, 0.15–0.31; P<0.00001; PFS, HR, 0.33; 95%CI, 0.25–0.44; P<0.00001), and grade 1–2 irAEs (OS, HR, 0.67; 95%CI, 0.58–0.78; P<0.00001; PFS, HR, 0.62; 95%CI, 0.51–0.76; P<0.00001) showed similar results. However, thyroid, lung, gastrointestinal, liver, and grade 3–4 irAEs were not significantly associated with OS and PFS. The occurrence of non-thyroid endocrine irAEs was significantly associated with better OS (HR, 0.22; 95%CI, 0.15–0.31; P<0.00001). In patients with melanoma treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (OS, HR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.51–0.72; P<0.00001; PFS, HR, 0.59; 95%CI, 0.47–0.74; P<0.00001), the association between irAEs and clinical benefit was clearer than in patients treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (OS, HR, 0.68; 95%CI, 0.52–0.89; P=0.005; PFS, HR, 0.93; 95%CI, 0.49–1.78; P=0.83).

Conclusion

Among patients with melanoma treated with ICIs, those who developed non-thyroid endocrine irAEs and cutaneous irAEs have better prognosis. This suggests that non-thyroid endocrine irAEs and cutaneous irAEs may be a prognostic biomarker for patients with melanoma treated with ICIs.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022338308.

Moderate Colitis Not Requiring Intravenous Steroids Is Associated with Improved Survival in Stage IV Melanoma after Anti-CTLA4 Monotherapy, But Not Combination Therapy

BACKGROUND

For patients with melanoma, gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events are common after receipt of anti-CTLA4 therapy. These present difficult decision points regarding whether to discontinue therapy. Detailing the situations in which colitis might predict for improved survival and how this is affected by discontinuation or resumption of therapy can help guide clinical decision-making.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage IV melanoma receiving anti-CTLA4 therapy from 2008 to 2019 were analyzed. Immune-related colitis treated with ≥50 mg prednisone or equivalent daily or secondary immunosuppression was included. Moderate colitis was defined as receipt of oral glucocorticoids only; severe colitis was defined as requiring intravenous glucocorticoids or secondary immunosuppression. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In total, 171 patients received monotherapy, and 91 received dual checkpoint therapy. In the monotherapy group, 25 patients developed colitis and a nonsignificant trend toward improved OS was observed in this group. Notably, when colitis was categorized as none, moderate or severe, OS was significantly improved for moderate colitis only. This survival difference was not present after dual checkpoint therapy. There were no differences in known prognostic variables between groups, and on multivariable analysis neither completion of all ipilimumab cycles nor resumption of immunotherapy correlated with OS, while the development of moderate colitis did significantly affect OS.

CONCLUSION

This single-institution retrospective series suggests moderate colitis correlates with improved OS for patients with stage IV melanoma treated with single-agent anti-CTLA4, but not dual agent, and that this is true regardless of whether the immune-checkpoint blockade is permanently discontinued.

Gut microbiota shed new light on the management of immune-related adverse events

Immunotherapy has dramatically revolutionized the therapeutic landscape for patients with cancer. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors are now accepted as effective anticancer therapies, they introduce a novel class of toxicity, termed immune‐related adverse events, which can lead to the temporary or permanent discontinuation of immunotherapy and life‐threatening tumor progression. Therefore, the effective prevention and treatment of immune‐related adverse events is a clinical imperative to maximize the utility of immunotherapies. Immune‐related adverse events are related to the intestinal microbiota, baseline gut microbiota composition is an important determinant of immune checkpoint inhibitor‐related colitis, and antibiotics exacerbate these undesirable side‐effects. Supplementation with specific probiotics reduces immune checkpoint inhibitor‐related colitis in mice, and fecal microbiota transplantation has now been shown to effectively treat refractory immune checkpoint inhibitor‐related colitis in the clinic. Hence, modifying the microbiota holds great promise for preventing and treating immune‐related adverse events. Microbiomes and their metabolites play important roles in the potential underlying mechanisms through interactions with both innate and adaptive immune cells. Here we review the gut microbiota and immune regulation; the changes occurring in the microbiota during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy; the relationship between the microbiota and immune‐related adverse events, antibiotics, probiotics/prebiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation in immune checkpoint inhibitor‐related colitis; and the protective mechanisms mediated by the microbiome and metabolites in immune‐related adverse events.

Prognostic value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and lactate dehydrogenase in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) showed promising therapeutic efficacy on melanoma. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) showed predictive values on prognosis of various tumors, but not on melanoma yet. This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the prognostic role of NLR and LDH levels in melanoma treated with ICIs.

METHODS

A search was conducted for all reports published till March 2020 in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Studies were included if they investigated the association between pretreatment NLR/LDH and prognosis in melanoma patients treated with ICIs. Subgroup analysis, publication bias, and meta-regression were conducted to investigate heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 6817 melanoma patients were included. Overall, high pretreatment NLR and LDH were associated with poor overall survival (OS) (P < .001) and PFS (P < .001). Subgroup analyses revealed that elevated NLR and LDH levels were associated with poor OS and PFS in patients treated with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 alone. NLR level was superior in predicting OS if compared with LDH level in patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 + anti-CTLA-4. In subgroup analysis stratified by cutoff value, high NLR level was associated with poor OS and PFS regardless of cutoff value, but LDH works when cutoff value = upper normal limit (UNL). The predictive value of NLR and LDH levels on OS and PFS was partially compromised in the Asian populations, compared with the Western countries.

CONCLUSION

Blood NLR and LDH levels showed great potential to be used as early prognostic biomarkers in melanoma patients treated with ICIs.

Pharmacological Treatments Available for Immune-Checkpoint-Inhibitor-Induced Colitis

Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment has shown revolutionary therapeutic effects in various carcinomas. However, immune-related adverse events (irAE) following this treatment can sometimes lead to treatment discontinuation. One such frequently encountered adverse event is immune-related colitis (irAE colitis). Corticosteroids (CS) are the first-line treatment for irAE colitis, but we often encounter CS-refractory or -resistant cases. The application of multiple biologics has been proposed as a therapy to be administered after CS treatment; however, the efficacy and safety of biologics for patients with irAE colitis who do not respond to CS have not been established. This review summarizes the treatment regimens available for irAE colitis, focusing on the mechanism of action of corticosteroids, infliximab, vedolizumab, and other drugs.

Harnessing big data to characterize immune-related adverse events

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed patient care in oncology but are associated with a unique spectrum of organ-specific inflammatory toxicities known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Given the expanding use of ICIs, an increasing number of patients with cancer experience irAEs, including severe irAEs. Proper diagnosis and management of irAEs are important to optimize the quality of life and long-term outcomes of patients receiving ICIs; however, owing to the substantial heterogeneity within irAEs, and despite multicentre initiatives, performing clinical studies of these toxicities with a sufficient cohort size is challenging. Pioneering studies from the past few years have demonstrated that aggregate clinical data, real-world data (such as data on pharmacovigilance or from electronic health records) and multi-omics data are alternative tools well suited to investigating the underlying mechanisms and clinical presentations of irAEs. In this Perspective, we summarize the advantages and shortcomings of different sources of 'big data' for the study of irAEs and highlight progress made using such data to identify biomarkers of irAE risk, evaluate associations between irAEs and therapeutic efficacy, and characterize the effects of demographic and anthropometric factors on irAE risk. Harnessing big data will accelerate research on irAEs and provide key insights that will improve the clinical management of patients receiving ICIs.

Immunotherapy for Melanoma

Melanoma is the leading cause of death from skin cancer and is responsible for over 7000 deaths in the USA each year alone. For many decades, limited treatment options were available for patients with metastatic melanoma; however, over the last decade, a new era in treatment dawned for oncologists and their patients. Targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors represents an important cornerstone in the treatment of metastatic melanoma; however, this chapter carefully reviews the past and current therapy options available, with a significant focus on immunotherapy-based approaches. In addition, we provide an overview of the results of recent advances in the adjuvant setting for patients with resected stage III and stage IV melanoma, as well as in patients with melanoma brain metastases. Finally, we provide a brief overview of the current research efforts in the field of immuno-oncology for melanoma.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Colitis: From Mechanism to Management

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as one of the innovative types of immunotherapies, including programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, have obtained unprecedented benefit in multiple malignancies. However, the immune response activation in the body organs could arise immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Checkpoint inhibitor colitis (CIC) is the most widely reported irAEs. However, some obscure problems, such as the mechanism concerning gut microbiota, the confusing differential diagnosis with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the optimal steroid schedule, the reintroduction of ICIs, and the controversial prognosis features, influence the deep understanding and precise diagnosis and management of CIC. Herein, we based on these problems and comprehensively summarized the relevant studies of CIC in patients with NSCLC, further discussing the future research direction of this specific pattern of irAEs.

Checkpoint Inhibitors in Melanoma Patients with Underlying Autoimmune Disease

The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has dramatically changed the clinical management of metastatic melanoma and other solid tumors. Despite exclusion from initial clinical trials, there is a growing body of retrospective data that suggest ICI can be used in patients with underlying autoimmune disease (AID) with a tolerable level of anticipated immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and a rate of severe irAEs comparable to that of patients without underlying AID. Coordination with other subspecialists and careful monitoring for irAEs is critical in safely managing these patients. Studies exploring novel approaches examining the use of targeted immunosuppressants in the prevention and management of irAEs, as well as multiple studies currently underway are aimed at establishing safe clinical practices when using ICI in patients with underlying AID.

Clinical characteristics of gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors and their association with survival

BACKGROUND

Despite the popularity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of advanced cancer, patients often develop gastrointestinal (GI) and non-GI immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of GI-irAEs have not been fully elucidated in previous reports. This necessitates the evaluation of the impact of GI-irAEs on patients receiving ICI treatment.

AIM

To evaluate the clinical characteristics of GI-irAEs and their impact on survival in patients treated with ICIs.

METHODS

In this single-center, retrospective, observational study, we reviewed the records of 661 patients who received ICIs for various cancers at Nagoya University Hospital from September 2014 to August 2020. We analyzed the clinical characteristics of patients who received ICI treatment. We also evaluated the correlation between GI-irAE development and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (LC) and malignant melanoma (MM). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the median overall survival (OS). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify prognostic factors. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

GI-irAEs occurred in 34 of 605 patients (5.6%) treated with an anti-programmed cell death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) antibody alone and in nine of 56 patients (16.1%) treated with an anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibody alone or a combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. The cumulative incidence and median daily diarrhea frequency were significantly higher in patients receiving anti-CTLA-4 antibodies (P < 0.05). In 130 patients with MM, OS was significantly prolonged in the group that continued ICI treatment despite the development of GI-irAEs compared to the group that did not experience GI-irAEs (P = 0.035). In contrast, in 209 patients with non-small cell LC, there was no significant difference in OS between the groups. The multivariate analyses showed that a performance status of 2-3 (hazard ratio: 2.406; 95% confidence interval: 1.125-5.147; P = 0.024) was an independent predictive factor for OS in patients with MM.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving anti-CTLA-4 antibodies develop GI-irAEs more frequently and with higher severity than those receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. Continuing ICI treatment in patients with MM with GI-irAEs have better OS.

Defining the correlation between immune-checkpoint inhibitors-related adverse events and clinical outcomes: a narrative review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have increased modern anticancer armamentarium portfolios, with 15%-60% of cancer patients deriving clinical benefit while others progress, including some occurrences of accelerated progressions. ICIs have also introduced a new pattern of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Recently, a mechanistic link was proposed in which patients who develop ICIs-related irAEs derive a survival benefit compared to those who do not, suggesting an overlap between toxicities and the treatment efficacy. Identifying predictive biomarkers to optimally identify patients who will benefit from ICIs is a contemporary research area in Oncology. However, the data remains sparse, with only several smaller studies showing a plausible direct proportionality of a therapeutic effect across tumours. In contrast, the overall survival and progression-free survival rate depend on the tumour type, degree of toxicities, duration of exposure, affected system/organs and inherent patient characteristics. Furthermore, the occurrence of irAEs appears to be more associated with a clinical benefit from programmed death 1 and programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors than anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4. Several questions remain unanswered, including the association between survival benefit and specific type of organ system toxicities, toxicity grade, if the benefit is entirely due to immortal-time biases (ITBs), presence of patients confounding comorbidities like autoimmune diseases, and finally, immune heterogeneities. Considering ITB represents a key element in interpreting these studies since patients with precipitated death or with an earlier disease progresses rarely develop irAEs; in fact, such patients have not stayed in the study long enough to experience such irAEs. Conversely, patients that stayed in the study for a longer period have a higher risk of developing irAEs. Landmark analysis is key in these studies if a real association is to be found. Overall response and disease control rates are mainly higher in those who develop irAEs due to immune activation. So, this review aims to summarise the evidence from key studies that addressed this important clinical question.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis in gastrointestinal malignancies and inflammatory bowel disease

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have markedly changed the landscape of cancer therapy. By re-invigorating the immune system against tumors, ICI provide novel therapeutic options for a broad variety of malignancies, including many gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. However, these therapies can also induce autoimmune-like side effects in healthy tissue across the body. One of the most common of these side effects is ICI-mediated colitis and diarrhea (IMC). Here, we review the incidence and risk of IMC in ICI therapy, with a focus on what is known regarding IMC in patients with GI malignancies. We also discuss data available on the use of ICI and risk of IMC in patients with pre-existing inflammatory bowel disease, as these patients may have increased risk of IMC due to their underlying intestinal pathology.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Oral Mucositis Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Cancer

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy predisposes patients to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Data are limited regarding the incidence, management, and outcomes of one such irAE: mucositis. In this study, we evaluated the clinical characteristics, disease course, treatment, and outcomes of ICI-mediated mucositis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center study of patients who received ICI therapy and developed oral mucositis at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from January 2009 to September 2019. Inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years, a diagnosis of oral mucositis and/or stomatitis based on ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, and therapy using CTLA-4 or PD-1/L1 inhibitors alone or combined with other agents.

RESULTS

We identified 152 patients with a mean age of 60 years, 51% of whom were men. Of the sample patients, 73% had stage IV cancer, with melanoma the most common (28%). Median time from ICI initiation to mucositis was 91 days. The most common clinical presentation of mucositis was odynophagia and/or oral pain (89%), 91% developed CTCAE grade 1-2 mucositis, and 78% received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy. Compared with anti-PD-1/L1-based therapy, anti-CTLA-4-based therapy was more frequently associated with earlier onset of mucositis (73 vs 96 days; P=.077) and a lower rate of symptom resolution (76% vs 92%; P=.029); 24% of patients required immunosuppressive therapy, which was associated with longer symptom duration (84 vs 34 days; P=.002) and higher mucositis recurrence rate (61% vs 32%; P=.006). ICI interruption was associated with worse survival (P=.037). Mucositis recurrence, immunosuppressant use, and presence of other irAEs did not affect survival.

CONCLUSIONS

For ICI-mediated mucositis, a diagnosis of exclusion has not been well recognized and is understudied. Although the clinical symptoms of mucositis are mostly mild, approximately 25% of patients require immunosuppression. Mucositis recurrence can occur in approximately 39% patients. Our results showed that ICI interruption compromises overall survival.

Durable responses in patients with genitourinary cancers following immune checkpoint therapy rechallenge after moderate-to-severe immune-related adverse events

Background

Immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) prolongs survival in subsets of patients with cancer but can also trigger immune-related adverse events (irAEs) requiring treatment discontinuation. Recent studies have investigated safety of ICT rechallenge after irAEs, and evidence suggests that rechallenge may be associated with improved antitumor responses. However, data are limited on response duration after ICT rechallenge, particularly after severe irAEs.

Objective

To evaluate safety and efficacy of ICT rechallenge after moderate-to-severe irAEs in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), urothelial carcinoma (UC), and prostate cancer.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, medical records from September 25, 2013, to June 1, 2020, for patients with genitourinary (GU) cancers at MD Anderson Cancer Center who were rechallenged with the same or different ICT following irAEs were reviewed. Demographics, ICT exposure, irAEs (grade and treatment), ICT discontinuation or rechallenge, rates of subsequent irAEs (new or recurrent) and antitumor activity (objective response rates and response duration) were reviewed.

Results

Sixty-one patients with RCC, UC, and prostate cancer were rechallenged with ICT after experiencing 105 total irAEs. Objective response rates after rechallenge, that is, upgrade in response, were 14% in RCC (4/28), 21% in UC (3/14), and 0% in prostate cancer. All seven patients who achieved upgrade in response had initial grade 2 or 3 irAEs. Responses were durable among these seven patients, with median radiographic progression-free survival not reached (range: 3.7–66.4 months) as of the March 8, 2021, data cut-off (median follow-up 40.9 months (95% CI 35.3 to 46.5)). All achieved complete response except one patient who was lost to follow-up. The rate of subsequent grade 3 or 4 irAEs after rechallenge was 30%, with no fatal irAEs. The rate of recrudescence of the same irAE was 26% (16/61). 54% of patients received corticosteroids (33/61), and 21% received targeted immunosuppression (13/61) for the initial irAEs.

Conclusions and relevance

ICT rechallenge after moderate-to-severe irAEs was associated with deep and durable responses in a subset of patients with RCC and UC, with acceptable safety and no fatal events. Strategies to enable ICT resumption after moderate-to-severe irAEs, such targeted immunosuppression, warrant further study.

Rechallenge patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors following severe immune-related adverse events: review of the literature and suggested prophylactic strategy

Patients with cancer who developed severe, grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors are at risk for developing severe toxicities again on rechallenge with checkpoint inhibitors. Consequently, medical oncologists and multidisciplinary teams are hesitant to retreat in this scenario, despite the fact that a number of patients may derive clinical benefit from this approach. Balancing such clinical benefit and treatment-related toxicities for each patient is becoming increasingly challenging as more and more patients with cancer are being treated with checkpoint inhibitors. In this manuscript, we provide an extensive overview of the relevant literature on retreatment after toxicity, and suggest prophylactic approaches to minimize the risk of severe irAE following rechallenge with immune checkpoint blockade, since treatment may be lifesaving in a number of occasions.

Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Colitis-A Clinical Overview of Incidence, Prognostic Implications and Extension of Current Treatment Options

In recent years, anti-tumor immunotherapies have witnessed a major breakthrough with the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, the use of ICIs has also brought an era of a certain class of adverse events that differ from those of classical chemotherapies and are more reminiscent of autoimmune diseases. This article focuses exclusively on colitis as an irAE with emphasis on vulnerable patient groups, the prognostic significance of colitis, treatment, and new therapeutic approaches that may be applicable. Colitis itself is associated with a favorable oncological outcome of the underlying disease but is as well the most common irAE leading to discontinuation of therapy. Especially in vulnerable patient groups such as IBD patients and elderly patients, colitis occurs more frequently as a side effect. It is precisely in these two patient groups that side effects more often lead to discontinuation of therapy. Therefore, in addition to the current therapy of colitis through immunosuppression, the focus should also be on new forms of therapy of severe colitis, such as fecal transplantation or ileostomy creation.

Association of Immune Related Adverse Events With Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Overall Survival in Cancers: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis

Objectives

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have brought impressive benefits to cancer patients, however often accompanied with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We aimed to investigate the association of irAEs with efficacy and overall survival in cancer patients treated by ICIs, and further quantify the association by stratifying subgroups.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library from database inception to 29 August 2019 were systematically searched. Articles reporting association of objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) with irAEs in cancer patients treated with approved ICIs were included. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidential intervals (CIs) were calculated for ORR, and hazard ratios (HR) were used for PFS and OS.

Results

A total of 52 articles comprising 9,156 patients were included. Pooled data demonstrated a statistically significant greater probability of achieving objective tumor response for patients with irAEs compared to those without (OR 3.91, 95% CI 3.05-5.02). In overall meta-analysis, patients who developed irAEs presented a prolonged PFS (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.46-0.62) and OS (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.41-0.59). More specifically, irAEs in certain cancer types (NSCLC and melanoma) and organs (skin and endocrine) were robustly associated with better clinical outcomes, while this association needs further verification regarding other tumors. High grade toxicities (G3-5) were not associated with a significantly favorable PFS or OS. Additionally, the association between irAEs and clinical benefit seemed to be more definite in patients receiving PD-(L)1 blockade than CTLA-4 blockade. Pooled data from landmark analyses displayed consistent results.

Conclusions

The occurrence of irAEs predicted improved tumor response and better survival in overall cancer patients treated with ICIs. Notably, the association stayed robust in certain cancer types (NSCLC and melanoma) and organ-specific irAEs (skin and endocrine).

Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAE) in Cancer Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) and Survival Outcomes Correlation: To Rechallenge or Not?

Simple Summary

This study examined the real-world experience and occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) under cancer checkpoint immunotherapy, and the relationship between its treatment rechallenge status and their impact on clinical outcomes. The current study demonstrates that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) reinitiation after an irAE-related interruption in the setting of cancer immunotherapy was not associated with significantly improved survival outcome when compared with those without ICI treatment reinitiation after irAE-related therapy interruption.

Abstract

Introduction: There is growing recognition of immune related adverse events (irAEs) from immune checkpoint therapies being correlated with treatment outcomes in certain malignancies. There are currently limited data or consensus to guide management of irAEs with regards to treatment rechallenge. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis with an IRB-approved protocol of adult patients seen at the WVU Cancer Institute between 2011–2019 with a histopathologic diagnosis of active cancers and were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) therapy. Results: Demographics were similar between the ICI interrupted irAE groups within cancer types. Overall, out of 548 patients who received ICI reviewed, there were 133 cases of ≥1 irAE found of any grade. Being treated with anti-CTLA-4 inhibitor ICI was associated with lower risk of death compared to anti-PD-1 ICI. The overall survival difference observed for irAE positive patients, between rechallenged (37.8 months, reinitiated with/without interruption; 38.6 months, reinitiated after interruption) and interrupted/non-reinitiated (i.e., discontinued) groups (24.9 months) was not statistically significant, with a numerical trend favoring the former. Conclusions: Our exploratory study did not identify significantly different survival outcomes among the Appalachian West Virginia adult cancer patients treated with ICI who developed irAE and had treatment reinitiated after interruption, when compared with those not reinitiated.

Immune-related adverse events: promising predictors for efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors

PURPOSE

This study was designed to investigate the correlation between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and corresponding efficacy, and to explore the potential of predicting the efficacy of ICIs via irAEs.

METHODS

Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wanfang were applied to search for relevant studies. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Stratification analyses were conducted according to the type of irAEs and ICIs, region of studies and primary tumors. Furthermore, statistical analyses were realized by means of RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Altogether, 40 studies with 8,641 participants were enrolled, among which the incidence of irAEs ranged from 15.34 to 85.23% and the major sites reached out to skin, endocrine organ, gastrointestinal tract, liver and lung. The ORR, OS and PFS in irAE group were significantly higher than those in non-irAE group as per pooled analyses and stratification analyses. Importantly, patients with irAEs in skin, endocrine organ or gastrointestinal tract rather than in liver and lung were found to obtain survival benefits (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

IrAEs, especially in skin, endocrine organ or gastrointestinal tract, triggered by ICIs indicate significant survival benefits.

Outcomes following immunotherapy re-challenge after immune-related adverse event: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Given the inconclusive evidence behind the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors re-challenge, herein, we have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize available data. Results/methodology: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database, and ASCO and ESMO were searched for studies published from conception to March 2020. Pooled incidence of recurrent immune-related adverse events (irAEs), objective response rates, and odds ratios for irAEs at initial versus re-treatment were calculated. Overall, 437 patients (ten studies) were included. Incidence of any grade, grade 3/4, and steroid-requiring recurrent irAEs were 47%, 13.2%, and 26% respectively. Objective response rate in previous non-responders was 12.5% (5.8–24.8%). Odds ratio for severe irAEs was 0.28 (0.11–0.72) and steroid-requiring irAEs 0.19 (0.06–0.56). Discussion/conclusion: This analysis suggests that immune checkpoint inhibitors re-challenge is safe and potentially efficacious.

Gastrointestinal Tract Adverse Events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown significant benefit in cancer patients. Their success, however, is associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which commonly affect the gastrointestinal tract, resulting in diarrhea and colitis. IrAEs range from mild self-limiting to severe life-threatening diseases and potentially limit the use of these medications. Diagnosis of ICI-induced enterocolitis is based on clinical symptoms, physical examination, stool tests, endoscopic and histologic evaluation, and/or imaging. Current management strategy is mainly anti-diarrheal agents for mild symptoms and immunosuppressants (e.g., corticosteroids, and infliximab or vedolizumab) for more severe diseases.

Management of Patients With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Enterocolitis: A Systematic Review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the treatment of several cancers. These drugs increase T-cell activity and the antitumor immune response but also have immune-related adverse effects that can affect the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. These adverse effects have been observed in 7% to 30% of patients treated with ICIs. As the number of diseases treated with ICIs increases, gastroenterologists will see more patients with ICI-induced GI adverse events. We performed a systematic review of the incidence, risk factors, clinical manifestations, and management of the adverse effects of ICIs on the GI tract. Treatment with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 often causes severe enterocolitis, whereas treatment with inhibitors of programmed cell death 1 have less frequent and more diverse adverse effects. Management of patients with GI adverse effects of ICIs should involve first ruling out other disorders, followed by assessment of severity, treatment with corticosteroids, and rapid introduction of infliximab therapy for nonresponders.