Phase I, first-in-human trial of programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, JTX-4014, in adult patients with advanced, refractory, solid tumors

Exploring immune checkpoint inhibitors: Focus on PD-1/PD-L1 axis and beyond

Immunotherapy emerges as a promising approach, marked by recent substantial progress in elucidating how the host immune response impacts tumor development and its sensitivity to various treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer therapy by unleashing the power of the immune system to recognize and eradicate tumor cells. Among these, inhibitors targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) have garnered significant attention due to their remarkable clinical efficacy across various malignancies. This review delves into the mechanisms of action, clinical applications, and emerging therapeutic strategies surrounding PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. We explore the intricate interactions between PD-1/PD-L1 and other immune checkpoints, shedding light on combinatorial approaches to enhance treatment outcomes and overcome resistance mechanisms. Furthermore, we discuss the expanding landscape of immune checkpoint inhibitors beyond PD-1/PD-L1, including novel targets such as CTLA-4, LAG-3, TIM-3, and TIGIT. Through a comprehensive analysis of preclinical and clinical studies, we highlight the promise and challenges of immune checkpoint blockade in cancer immunotherapy, paving the way for future advancements in the field.

Efficacy and Safety of Iparomlimab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Phase 1c Study

INTRODUCTION

Iparomlimab (QL1604) is a humanized immunoglobulin G4 mAb against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1). Here, we report the preliminary efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of iparomlimab in patients with advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

In this open-label, phase 1c study, patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors, either failed or had no standard therapies available, were enrolled and received intravenous iparomlimab at 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) assessed by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1.

RESULTS

Between July 20, 2020, and September 6, 2021, 71 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of iparomlimab. The ORR was 9.9% (7/71) and disease control rate was 36.6% (26/71). Median duration of response of all responders was 10.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-not estimable]. Additionally, the median time to progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.4-2.8), 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.4-2.7), and 9.7 months (95% CI, 7.2-15.3), respectively. A total of 52 (73.2%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (grade ≥ 3, 19.7%). The most common TRAE (≥ 10%) was anemia (18.3%). A total of 20 (28.2%) experienced immune-related adverse events (grade ≥ 3, 7.0%). TRAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug occurred in 4 (5.6%) patients, including immune-mediated myocarditis (2 patients), Guillain-Barré syndrome (1 patient), and diarrhea (1 patient).

CONCLUSIONS

Iparomlimab showed preliminary clinical activity and had a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced solid tumors. These results support further investigation of iparomlimab as monotherapy or in combination therapy in advanced solid tumors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05801094. Retrospectively registered in 2023-03-24.

Treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies related to PD-1, PD-L1, or CTLA-4 inhibitors across tumor types: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Increased understanding of how the immune system regulates tumor growth has innovated the use of immunotherapeutics to treat various cancers. The impact of such therapies, including programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, on the production of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) and their impact on outcomes, is poorly understood. This study aims to evaluate the clinical trial evidence on ADA incidence associated with PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 inhibitors in the treatment of cancer and to assess associations between treatment administered, ADA incidence, and treatment outcomes.

METHODS

Embase®, Medline®, and EBM Reviews were searched via the OVID® platform on February 15, 2022. Conference proceedings, clinical trial registries, and global regulatory and reimbursement body websites were also searched. Eligible publications included clinical trials enrolling patients receiving cancer treatment with either PD-1, PD-L1, or CTLA-4 reporting outcomes including incidence or prevalence of ADAs and the impact of immunogenicity on treatment safety and efficacy. Reference lists of eligible publications were also searched. The review was conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and evidence quality assessment was conducted using the appropriate Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool.

RESULTS

After screening 4160 records and reviewing 97 full publications, a total of 34 publications reporting on 68 trials were included. A further 41 relevant clinical trials were identified on ClinicalTrials.gov and a further 32 from searches of packaging inserts. In total, 141 relevant trials covering 15 different checkpoint inhibitors and 16 different tumor types were included. Across the included trials, atezolizumab was associated with the highest incidence of ADAs (29.6% of 639 patients), followed by nivolumab (11.2% of 2,085 patients). Combination checkpoint inhibitor treatment appeared to increase the rate of ADAs versus monotherapy. Only 17 trials reported on the impact of ADAs on treatment outcomes with mixed results for the impact of ADAs on treatment efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics.

CONCLUSIONS

Checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of cancer are immunogenic, with the incidence of treatment-emergent ADAs varying between individual therapies. It remains unclear what impact ADAs have on treatment outcomes.

Establishment of two oxaliplatin-resistant gallbladder cancer cell lines and comprehensive analysis of dysregulated genes

Acquired resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs in gallbladder cancer (GBC) results in therapy failure. This study is aimed to establish oxaliplatin (OXA)-resistant GBC cell lines and uncover their gene expression profiles. First, two OXA-resistant GBC cell lines (GBC-SD/OXA and SGC996/OXA) were established by gradually increasing the drug concentration, and the resistance index was 4-5. The two resistant cell lines showed slower proliferation and higher stemness, colony formation, and migration abilities. Epithelial mesenchymal transformation and increased levels of P-glycoprotein were also detected. Next RNA-sequence analysis identified 4,675 dysregulated genes (DGs) in resistant cells, and most of the 12 randomly selected DGs were verified to be consistent with the sequence results. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis indicated that several DGs were involved in resistance- and phenotype-related pathways, of which the activations of PD-L1 and ERK1/2 were both verified in resistant cell lines. In conclusion, this study is the first to report the gene expression profile of OXA-resistant GBC cells and provides a useful database for target development.

Evaluation of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced salivary gland carcinoma in the phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study

AIM

We evaluated pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with advanced salivary gland carcinoma on the phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study (NCT02628067).

METHODS

Eligible patients had histologically/cytologically confirmed advanced salivary gland carcinoma with prior failure or intolerance to standard therapy, measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v1.1., and ECOG performance status 0-1. Patients were enrolled irrespective of tumour PD-L1 expression. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles (∼2 years). Radiographic imaging occurred every 9 weeks through month 12, then every 12 weeks. PD-L1 positivity was defined as combined positive score ≥1 (evaluated using PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx). The primary endpoint was objective response rate per RECIST v1.1.

RESULTS

In total, 109 patients were enrolled (PD-L1-positive, 25.7%). At the data cutoff (October 5, 2020), median follow-up was 53.3 (range, 50.8-56.3) months. Objective response rate was 4.6% (95% CI, 1.5-10.4%) among all patients (complete response, n = 1; partial response, n = 4) and was 10.7% (95% CI, 2.3-28.2%) in patients with PD-L1-positive disease and 2.6% (95% CI, 0.3-9.1%) in patients with PD-L1-negative disease. Duration of response was ≥24 months for all 5 responders; median duration of response was not reached (range, 25.1-49.8+ months). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.0 (95% CI, 2.6-4.2) and 21.1 (95% CI, 15.9-25.5) months, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 75.2% (grade 3-4, 15.6%; grade 5, 0%) of patients. Immune-mediated adverse events occurred in 22.0% of patients (grade 3, 5.5%; grade 4-5, 0).

CONCLUSIONS

A small subset of patients with advanced salivary gland carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab had a response; all had response duration ≥2 years. The safety profile of pembrolizumab was manageable.

Dosing Regimens of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Attempts at Lower Dose, Less Frequency, Shorter Course

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a revolutionary breakthrough in the field of cancer by modulating patient's own immune system to exert anti-tumor effects. The clinical application of ICIs is still in its infancy, and their dosing regimens need to be continuously adjusted. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies showed a significant plateau in the exposure-response curve, with high receptor occupancy and plasma concentrations achieved at low dose levels. Coupled with concerns about drug toxicity and heavy economic costs, there has been an ongoing quest to reevaluate the current ICI dosing regimens while preserving maximum clinical efficacy. Many clinical data showed remarkable anticancer effects with ICIs at the doses far below the approved regimens, indicating the possibility of dose reduction. Our review attempts to summarize the clinical evidence for ICIs regimens with lower-dose, less-frequency, shorter-course, and provide clues for further ICIs regimen optimization.